[Science of symptomatology: skin manifestations. Skin diseases associated with metabolic disorders: the observation of systemic conditions through the dermal symptoms].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) commonly involves the skin as well as peripheral blood and lymph nodes. During the last 15 years we have studied 124 cases of ATLL with specific skin manifestations. Twenty-one patients (16.9%) were classified as acute, 21 (16.9%) as chronic, 26 (21.0%) as lymphoma, and 56 (45.2%) as smouldering according to Shimoyama's classification. Many patients had nodules/tumors (34.7%), erythematous plaques (22.6%), and erythematous papules (19.4%) similar to those occurring with other cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Some patients displayed characteristic skin manifestations resembling non-neoplastic cutaneous disorders. The median survival time (MST) of all patients was 12.0 months. The MSTs of individual clinical types were: acute type, 4 months; chronic type, 14 months; lymphoma type, 7 months; and smouldering type, 16 months. In the smouldering type, cases with a deeper infiltration pattern (MST, 14 months) had a more aggressive course than those with a superficial infiltration pattern (MST, 24 months) (p < 0.05). The results indicate that smouldering type ATLL with skin manifestations may have a worse prognosis than without skin manifestations. Moreover, some cases of the smouldering type with specific skin lesions should be classified into another group with a much poorer prognosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The incidence of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is rising at an alarming rate. Usually, the first clue that a patient has human immunodeficiency (HIV) infection is the emergence of a skin disease. Early diagnosis and aggressive therapy are vital in the management of these conditions. In Part 1 of this article, the author discussed AIDS-related infectious diseases of the skin. In Part 2, he discusses noninfectious inflammatory diseases, malignant cutaneous neoplasms, and nonclassified skin changes found in HIV-infected individuals, as well as their optimal management.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Paroxystic vasomotor skin manifestations are provoked by various etiologies. Widespread or generalized vasomotor skin manifestations may be induced by a physiological reaction (emotinal flushing), by a drug (vasodilator drugs, antabuse, antidiabetic, sulfonamides), by a discharge of histamine (urticaria, mastocytosis) or by an hypersecretion of serotonin (dumping-syndrome, carcinoid syndrome). They may be caused by an endocrinopathy (menopause, hyperthyroidism, hypoglycaemia, medullary thyroid carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, endocrine pancreas, carcinoma). More rarely vasomotor troubles happen in homocystinuria, inhalation of a toxic (trichlorethylen, calcic cyanamid) and exceptionally in some immunohaematologic diseases. Main localized vasomotor skin manifestations observed are dermographism, facial flushing (Sluder's syndrome, cluster headaches, Frey's syndrome, Riley-Day's syndrome) and acral syndromes (Raynaud's phenomenon, erythromelalgia).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: We frequently observed allergic skin reactions in patients with documented history of alcoholic liver disease (ALD). To assess the potential association between alcohol-induced liver damage and urticaria a prospective randomized trial investigating immunologic parameters in various stages of alcoholic liver disease was designed. Fifty patients were available for analysis. METHODS: By means of a multivariate discriminant analysis seven out of a number of laboratory and clinical parameters (level of serum proteins, serum globulins, gamma globulins, albumin/globulin ratio, and immunoglobulins A, E, and G) have been found important for analysis. They were compared with age, general clinical status, degree of progression of alcoholic liver disease, and frequency of appearance of type I skin reactions. Results were further processed by means of logistic general linear models, Chi-square test, and summarized in a structural equation model. RESULTS: Alcoholic liver disease does not influence IgA, IgG, and A/G Index directly, but it increases levels of IgE. About 13% of variance of IgA, IgG, and A/G Index are affected by group membership only in non-alcoholic liver disease, and 27% of variance of IgE can be explained by alcoholic liver disease. There were striking differences in IgE content between alcoholic liver disease and control groups. Degree of liver disease had a negative impact on A/G Index, and on IgA, and a positive on IgG. About 16% of variance can be explained by degree of liver disease. IgE is not degree related. Alcoholic liver disease as a disease was found as the most important predictor of skin reactivity (p = 0.0046). Of all immunologic parameters investigated IgE followed by A/G Index was found as the most significant predictor of allergic skin reactions. The extent of alcoholic liver disease plays not a role in allergic skin manifestations. Alcoholic nature of liver disease itself is a significant factor causing allergic skin reactions (p = 0.0002), but alcoholism itself as an independent factor contributes to increased incidence of skin allergies. CONCLUSIONS: Alcoholic liver disease plays an important role in development of type I allergic skin manifestations. This effect has a direct mechanism through alcohol itself, and an indirect through elevation of IgE. Alcohol in liver disease and not liver disease causes immunologic abnormalities and accounts significantly for increased appearance of allergic skin reactions regardless of the extent of underlying liver disease.
Skin manifestations represent the most often observed clinical symptoms in food allergy. Immediate symptoms are urticaria, angioedema and sudden erythema (flush). Delayed symptoms which can be observed are exanthema and exacerbation or worsening of eczema (most often atopic dermatitis). Since delayed symptoms are difficult to diagnose, oral provocation tests are often necessary for patients with a suspected late onset of symptoms upon food ingestion. There is evidence that besides specific IgE, specific T cells play a role in the deterioration of eczema in atopic dermatitis. Although urticarial skin lesions are most often observed upon oral provocation with a suspected food, the rate of IgE-mediated food allergy in acute or chronic urticaria is rather low. In some patients suffering from chronic urticaria, intolerance reactions are also suspected. Since no laboratory or skin tests are available yet for the identification of clinically relevant food additives causing urticaria, oral provocation tests are mandatory for these patients.
The skin manifestations of the patients with definitive Sjögren's syndrome were clinically studied. Chief complaints at the first consultation included annular erythema, pernio-like erythema, Raynaud's phenomenon, purpura, and malar erythema. Drug eruptions and xerotic eczema were also occasionally observed during the course. However, annular erythema, pernio-like erythema, drug eruptions, purpura, facial pigmented patches, and erythema nodosum were observed much more frequently in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome. These skin manifestations might be useful clues for the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome in dermatological fields.
BACKGROUND: Arsenic contamination in groundwater affects 35 million people in Bangladesh, but the prevalence of arsenic contamination in local communities remains to be clarified. As skin manifestations are sensitive markers of arsenicosis, we examined the skin of adults and adolescents in two villages to elucidate the severity of arsenicosis. METHODS: Five hundred and sixty-one villagers were randomly selected for the evaluation of their skin. Three indicators, i.e. keratosis on the soles, keratosis on the palms, and melanosis and hypopigmentation on the trunk, were quantified for analysis. RESULTS: More than 50% of the villagers showed some skin manifestations due to arsenicosis. Keratosis on the soles was the most sensitive marker for the detection of arsenicosis at an early stage. Interestingly, the skin manifestations were more severe in males than in females. There was no correlation between the age and the severity of skin manifestations. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of arsenicosis was quite high and males were more vulnerable to arsenic contamination. Using skin manifestations, especially keratosis on the soles, as useful markers to detect and evaluate arsenicosis, it is clear that there is an urgent need to assess the exact prevalence and severity of arsenicosis in the population of Bangladesh in order to take measures to treat and control this problem.
According to Hansen's contact rule, the digestive system should be considered as the main shock organ, yet in food allergy, this is not the case. Very often specific food triggers clinical manifestations not involving the digestive system; that is, reactions are manifested either in the respiratory system, as asthma or rhinitis, or in the skin. In these cases the BALT (broncho-alveolar lymphoid tissue) and GALT (gastrointestinal lymphoid tissue) units play a basic role in the sensitizations. The purpose of this study was to determine the most frequent skin manifestations of food allergy among children, and the most frequently involved foods. We also thought it interesting to evaluate the diagnostic reliability of the different standard immunological parameters utilized by the study team in food allergy. All patients underwent intracutaneous tests with 12 groups of the most frequent food allergens, as well as serum IgE, antigen-specific IgE against foods, and antigen-specific histamine release tests. Antigen-specific IgG4 determination was performed in some cases. The results obtained confirmed previous studies, the most common manifestations being: angioedema (48%), followed by urticaria (31%) and atopic dermatitis (21%). Regarding the frequency of sensitization to different food allergens, in mono- or polisensitization, fish and egg stand out in our environment. Certain food allergens are more frequently responsible for specific skin manifestations. Thus, for fish sensitization, the most frequent skin manifestation is atopic dermatitis (50%); for egg sensitization, angioedema is the most frequent skin manifestation (50%); and for milk, urticaria (50%). Finally, and in agreement with previous works regarding the diagnostic reliability of in vitro techniques, we found that the histamine release test offered the highest percentage of diagnostic reliability. Only for sensitization to milk proteins did antigen-specific IgE demonstrate higher reliability. Once again, we stress that our main problem is the lower reliability of skin tests against food allergens than against inhalant allergens. We emphasize the importance of food as a major factor in the etiopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis, as well as the need to complement the study, when possible, by means of the in vitro techniques described.