Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “SEQC2”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

SeqQC-former: A sequence-quality fusion framework for QC-aware review prioritization of candidate somatic SNVs in cancer genomics.

The accurate prioritization of candidate somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) remains a challenge due to the substantial variability in sequencing quality across genomic loci. SeqQC-Former is a sequence-quality fusion framework that integrates the local nucleotide context with read-level quality-control (QC) covariates derived from matched tumor-normal sequencing data. This integration generates QC-aware prioritization scores for the downstream review of candidate variants. Unlike conventional variant callers, SeqQC-Former is designed not to infer biological truth but to support post-calling review and prioritization under heterogeneous sequencing conditions. The framework was trained and evaluated on a SEQC2-derived dataset comprising 89,447 candidate loci, including 1378 positive and 88,069 negative loci. In chromosome-held-out validation, which aims to reduce potential genomic-position leakage, SeqQC-Former demonstrated strong discrimination (AUROC = 0.9479; AUPRC = 0.9448), indicating good generalization to previously unseen chromosomes. Given that the SEQC2-derived labels contain QC-associated information; these results should be interpreted as an evaluation of QC-aware prioritization capability rather than an independent validation of biological variant correctness. Ablation analyses revealed that structured QC covariates provided the dominant predictive signal under the current SEQC2-derived labeling regime. SeqQC-Former achieved a significantly higher AUROC than classical machine-learning baselines, as determined by DeLong's test (p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.01). Application to 53,164 glioblastoma variants demonstrated that external predictions were sensitive to QC scaling and threshold selection, underscoring that model outputs should be interpreted as QC-dependent prioritization scores rather than calibrated probabilities or definitive biological classifications. Overall, SeqQC-Former offers a reproducible post-calling QC-aware prioritization framework for large-scale somatic SNV review and underscores the importance of explicitly modeling sequencing-quality information when interpreting structured cancer genomics datasets.

Humans

Somatic likelihood tiering: an interpretable post-calling triage protocol for tumor-only whole-exome variant review.

Tumor-only whole-exome sequencing (WES) is used when matched normal tissue is unavailable, but one sample can produce thousands of variants. Somatic likelihood tiering (SLT) is an interpretable post-calling protocol that ranks Mutect2 calls into four review-priority tiers using population-frequency, germline-quality, cancer-knowledge, PureCN posterior, and clonal-hematopoiesis evidence. Layer 2 distinguishes common, rare-callable, and unevaluable gnomAD states; missing or unmatchable gnomAD evidence is not positive rarity evidence. On the SEQC2 HCC1395 benchmark, the callability-aware SLT-A row contained 101 calls, 78 truth variants, 77.2% PPV (95% Wilson confidence interval 68.1%-84.3%), and a Number Needed to Review (NNR) of 1.29 (1.19-1.47). The conservative SLT-C catchment retained 352 of 455 truth variants (77.4%, 73.3%-81.0%) and all tiers together retained 430 of 455 truth variants. SNV performance is the primary calibration frame: SLT-C retained 341 of 439 SNV truth variants, whereas indel results were exploratory because only 16 truth indels were available. Clinical cohorts are reported as recall and concordance versus partially dependent matched-normal Mutect2 references, not independent clinical sensitivity. Patient-level bootstrap intervals were principal: HdM-BLCA-1 SLT-A recall was 18.2% (14.0%-23.5%), and LUAD-TW SLT-A recall was 49.1% (26.6%-63.3%) among 32 evaluable patients. The HdM-BLCA-1 median SLT-A queue remained 1277 variants per patient, so SLT reduces first-pass candidate counts but does not measure review time or eliminate FFPE candidate-count burden. SLT provides an auditable tumor-only WES review queue, not a substitute for matched-normal sequencing, independent orthogonal validation, or definitive somatic classification.

Humans

Evaluating the analytical validity of circulating tumor DNA sequencing assays for precision oncology.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing is being rapidly adopted in precision oncology, but the accuracy, sensitivity and reproducibility of ctDNA assays is poorly understood. Here we report the findings of a multi-site, cross-platform evaluation of the analytical performance of five industry-leading ctDNA assays. We evaluated each stage of the ctDNA sequencing workflow with simulations, synthetic DNA spike-in experiments and proficiency testing on standardized, cell-line-derived reference samples. Above 0.5% variant allele frequency, ctDNA mutations were detected with high sensitivity, precision and reproducibility by all five assays, whereas, below this limit, detection became unreliable and varied widely between assays, especially when input material was limited. Missed mutations (false negatives) were more common than erroneous candidates (false positives), indicating that the reliable sampling of rare ctDNA fragments is the key challenge for ctDNA assays. This comprehensive evaluation of the analytical performance of ctDNA assays serves to inform best practice guidelines and provides a resource for precision oncology.

Circulating Tumor DNA