Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “SCHIZOPHRENIA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Antipsychotic medication for those with both schizophrenia and learning disability.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic medication is the standard treatment for people with learning disability and schizophrenia. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of any antipsychotic medication for treating people with a dual diagnosis of learning disability and schizophrenia. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searching of Biological Abstracts, the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of trials, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycLIT and MEDLINE. Unpublished data were sought from pharmaceutical companies. Both authors independently selected the relevant studies from the reports identified in this way. SELECTION CRITERIA: 1. All randomised controlled trials of antipsychotic medication, regardless of dosage, versus a placebo control, of longer than one month's duration. 2. Anyone over 18 years of age with both learning disability and schizophrenia. Learning disability was defined as a measured IQ of 70 or less. Any mode of diagnosis of schizophrenia was acceptable. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The two reviewers independently attempted to select and then extract data but it was not possible to do this with the single study that met the inclusion criteria. MAIN RESULTS: Only one relevant randomised trial was found by the searches. This study included four people with a dual diagnosis of schizophrenia and learning disability, but results were available for only two. The groups to which the other two people were allocated were unclear. In order to display the data, too many assumptions would have to have been made about these other two people and any results would be uninformative and potentially misleading. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Using the methods described the reviewers found no randomised controlled trial evidence to guide the use of antipsychotic medication for those with both learning disability and schizophrenia. Until the urgent need for randomised controlled trials is met clinical practice will continue to be guided by extrapolation of evidence from randomised controlled trials involving people with schizophrenia but without learning disability and non-randomised trials of those with learning disability and schizophrenia.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

Validity of the family history method for diagnosing schizophrenia, schizophrenia-related psychoses, and schizophrenia-spectrum personality disorders in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia probands.

This study examined the validity of the family history method for diagnosing schizophrenia, schizophrenia-related psychoses, and schizophrenia-spectrum personality disorders in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia probands. This is the first large-scale study that examined the validity of the family history method for diagnosing DSM-III-R personality disorders. The best estimate DSM-III-R diagnoses of 264 first-degree relatives of 117 adult-onset schizophrenia probands based on direct structured diagnostic interviews, family history interview, and medical records were compared to Family History Research Diagnostic Criteria (FH-RDC) diagnoses based on the NIMH Relative Psychiatric History Interview and to family history Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R: Personality Disorders (SCID-II) diagnoses based on the SCID-II adapted to a third person format. Diagnoses of relatives were made blind to proband diagnostic status. The median sensitivity for schizophrenia and the related psychoses was 29% (range 0-50%), the median specificity 99% (range 98-100%), and the median positive predictive value (PPV) 67% (range 20-80%). The median sensitivity for the personality diagnoses was 25% (range 14-71%), the median specificity 100% (range 99-100%), and the median PPV 100% (range 67-100%). The family history method has low sensitivity but has excellent specificity and PPV for schizophrenia, schizophrenia-related psychoses, and schizophrenia-spectrum personality disorders. The kappa coefficient for the family history method was moderately good for the psychoses (0.598) and for paranoid and schizotypal personality disorder (0.576). Using the family history method, the validity of making schizophrenia-related personality disorder diagnoses was comparable to that of making psychotic disorder diagnoses.

Adolescent↗

Beta-blocker supplementation of standard drug treatment for schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Many people with schizophrenia or similar severe mental disorders do not achieve a satisfactory treatment response with ordinary antipsychotic drug treatment. In these cases, various add-on medications are used, among them beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (beta-blockers). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of beta-blockers as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia or similar severe mental disorders. SEARCH STRATEGY: Publications in all languages were searched from the following databases: Biological Abstracts, CENTRAL of The Cochrane Library, Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Specialised Register, EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, and PsycLIT. The reference section of papers included were screened. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials comparing beta-blockers with placebo as an adjunct to conventional antipsychotic medication for those with schizophrenia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were selected and then data extracted, independently, by at least two reviewers. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of homogeneous dichotomous data were calculated with the Peto method. A random effects model was used for heterogeneous dichotomous data. Weighted mean differences were calculated for continuous data. MAIN RESULTS: Currently the review includes five studies but data are poorly presented and do not evidence any effect of beta-blockers as an adjunct to conventional antipsychotic medication. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: At present beta-blockers cannot be recommended in the treatment of schizophrenia. Any possible benefit of adjunctive beta-blockers is obscured by the poor reporting of the included studies. Existing data on beta-blockers as adjunctive medication to antipsychotics for those with schizophrenia should be collected and re-analysed in order to allow confident conclusions about the effect of this treatment or the need for further trials.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Late-onset schizophrenia and very-late-onset schizophrenia-like psychosis: an international consensus. The International Late-Onset Schizophrenia Group.

OBJECTIVE: Although schizophrenia is generally regarded as an illness with onset in late adolescence or early adult life, a sizeable minority of patients first become ill in middle or old age. Inconsistencies in diagnostic systems and nomenclature, coupled with a tendency among most schizophrenia researchers to ascribe late-onset psychoses to organic factors, have led to such cases occupying an ambiguous position in relation to schizophrenia. Through systematic review of the literature and publication of a consensus statement from an international group of experts in the field, this article aims to clarify the positions of late-onset schizophrenia and very-late-onset schizophrenia-like psychosis. METHOD: The authors conducted a MEDLINE literature review and developed a consensus statement summarizing the findings from 2 days of debate and discussion by members of the International Late-Onset Schizophrenia Group. RESULTS: The group achieved consensus on diagnosis, nomenclature, treatment guidelines, and future research directions. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of epidemiology, symptom profile, and identified pathophysiologies, the diagnoses of late-onset schizophrenia (illness onset after 40 years of age) and very-late-onset schizophrenia-like psychosis (onset after 60 years) have face validity and clinical utility. General adoption of these categories will foster systematic investigation of such patients.

Adolescent↗

Schizophrenia and schizophrenia-spectrum personality disorders in the first-degree relatives of children with schizophrenia: the UCLA family study.

BACKGROUND: This study tested the hypothesis that childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS) is a variant of adult-onset schizophrenia (AOS) by determining if first-degree relatives of COS probands have an increased risk for schizophrenia and schizotypal and paranoid personality disorders. METHODS: Relatives of COS probands (n = 148) were compared with relatives of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (n = 368) and community control (n = 206) probands. Age-appropriate structured diagnostic interviews were used to assign DSM-III-R diagnoses to probands and their relatives. Family psychiatric history was elicited from multiple informants. Diagnoses of relatives were made blind to information about probands' diagnoses. Final consensus diagnoses, which integrated family history, direct interview information, and medical records, are reported in this article. RESULTS: There was an increased lifetime morbid risk for schizophrenia (4.95% +/- 2.16%) and schizotypal personality disorder (4.20% +/- 2.06%) in the parents of COS probands compared with parents of ADHD (0.45% +/- 0.45%, 0.91% +/- 0.63%) and community control (0%) probands. The parents of COS probands diagnosed as having schizophrenia had an early age of first onset of schizophrenia. Risk for avoidant personality disorder (9.41% +/- 3.17%) was increased in the parents of COS probands compared with parents of community controls (1.67% +/- 1.17%). CONCLUSIONS: The psychiatric disorders that do and do not aggregate in the parents of COS probands are remarkably similar to the disorders that do and do not aggregate in the parents of adults with schizophrenia in modern family studies. These findings provide compelling support for the hypothesis of etiological continuity between COS and AOS.

Adolescent↗

Identification of polymorphisms within Disrupted in Schizophrenia 1 and Disrupted in Schizophrenia 2, and an investigation of their association with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder.

We have undertaken a search for polymorphic sequence variation within Disrupted in Schizophrenia 1 and Disrupted in Schizophrenia 2 (DISC1 and DISC2), which are both novel genes that span a translocation breakpoint strongly associated with schizophrenia and related psychoses in a large Scottish family. A scan of the coding sequence, intron/exon boundaries, and part of the 5' and 3' untranslated regions of DISC1, plus 2.7 kb at the 3' end of DISC2, has revealed a novel microsatellite and 15 novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We have tracked the inheritance of four of the SNPs through multiply affected families, and carried out case-control association studies using the microsatellite and four common SNPs on populations of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder versus normal control subjects. Neither co-segregation with disease status nor significant association was detected; however, we could not detect linkage disequilibrium between all these markers in the control population, arguing that an even greater density of informative markers is required to test rigorously for association in this genomic region.

Alleles↗

Diagnostic issues in chronic schizophrenia: kraepelinian schizophrenia, undifferentiated schizophrenia, and state-independent negative symptoms.

Data are presented concerning three recent clinical distinctions in schizophrenia: kraepelinian versus non-kraepelinian patients; mixed versus simple undifferentiated subtypes; and state-dependent versus state-independent negative symptoms. Schizophrenic patients who have been ill and dependent on others for the past 5 years ('kraepelinians') were compared to other chronic schizophrenics. The kraepelinian patients met the criteria for schizophrenia by more diagnostic systems than other patients, were less responsive to haloperidol, had more severe negative symptoms and formal thought disorder, and had similarly severe positive symptoms. They also had cerebral ventricles that demonstrated more left-to-right asymmetry and a greater family history of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Mixed undifferentiated schizophrenic patients, who met criteria for more than one schizophrenic subtype, were compared to simple undifferentiated schizophrenic patients, who met criteria for no subtype. The mixed group was characterized by more severe positive and negative symptoms and formal thought disorder, worse social functioning, and a worse response to haloperidol. In a subgroup of patients who were studied once while in a state of exacerbation and once while in a state of relative remission, the negative symptoms of inattention and affective flattening were state-dependent, while anhedonia-asociality was state-independent.

Adult↗

[Diagnostic criteria for borderline schizophrenia on the basis of the SSDBS (symptom schedule for the diagnosis of borderline schizophrenia). A comparison between borderline syndrome, schizophrenias and affective diseases].

In the present study the SSDBS, a reliable instrument for detecting borderline schizophrenia developed by Khouri and co-workers (1980), was used to determine the number of probands with this diagnosis in an index sample composed of heterogeneous borderline syndromes as well as in schizophrenic, manic and depressive control groups. On this basis, significant differences between borderlines, on the one hand, and those with mania and depression, on the other, came to light--even after controlling for Schneider's first rank symptoms-, whereas none occurred between borderline patients and probands with schizophrenia. The research problem of SSDBS-symptom overlap with the symptomatology found in the schizophrenics of the present investigation as well as the possibility that other borderline concepts not based on the SSDBS might overlap more with morbid affectivity was then discussed.

Adult↗

Traumatic brain injury and schizophrenia in members of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder pedigrees.

OBJECTIVE: Schizophrenia following a traumatic brain injury could be a phenocopy of genetic schizophrenia or the consequence of a gene-environment interaction. Alternatively, traumatic brain injury and schizophrenia could be spuriously associated if those who are predisposed to develop schizophrenia have greater amounts of trauma for other reasons. The authors investigated the relationship between traumatic brain injury and psychiatric diagnoses in a large group of subjects from families with at least two biologically related first-degree relatives with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder. METHOD: The Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies was used to determine history of traumatic brain injury and diagnosis for 1,275 members of multiplex bipolar disorder pedigrees and 565 members of multiplex schizophrenia pedigrees. RESULTS: Rates of traumatic brain injury were significantly higher for those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression than for those with no mental illness. However, multivariate analysis of within-pedigree data showed that mental illness was related to traumatic brain injury only in the schizophrenia pedigrees. Independent of diagnoses, family members of those with schizophrenia were more likely to have had traumatic brain injury than were members of the bipolar disorder pedigrees. The members of the schizophrenia pedigrees also failed to show the gender difference for traumatic brain injury (more common in men than in women) that was expected and was present in the bipolar disorder pedigrees. Subjects with a schizophrenia diagnosis who were members of the bipolar disorder pedigrees (and thus had less genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia) were less likely to have had traumatic brain injury (4.5%) than were subjects with schizophrenia who were members of the schizophrenia pedigrees (and who had greater genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia) (19.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Members of the schizophrenia pedigrees, even those without a schizophrenia diagnosis, had greater exposure to traumatic brain injury compared to members of the bipolar disorder pedigrees. Within the schizophrenia pedigrees, traumatic brain injury was associated with a greater risk of schizophrenia, consistent with synergistic effects between genetic vulnerability for schizophrenia and traumatic brain injury. Posttraumatic-brain-injury schizophrenia in multiplex schizophrenia pedigrees does not appear to be a phenocopy of the genetic disorder.

Adult↗

Individual psychodynamic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis for schizophrenia and severe mental illness.

BACKGROUND: People with schizophrenia and severe mental illness may need much support from health care professionals, in most cases over a long period of time. Research on the effects of psychotherapy for schizophrenia shows mixed results. Although pharmacological interventions remain the treatment of choice for schizophrenia patients, it is also of interest to look at the effects of treatment methods focusing on psychosocial factors affecting schizophrenia. OBJECTIVES: To review the effects of individual psychodynamic psychotherapy and/or psychoanalysis for people with schizophrenia or severe mental illness. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1985-1999), CINAHL (1982-1999), The Cochrane Library CENTRAL (Issue 1, 1999), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (1999), Dissertation Abstracts On disc (1866-1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), PsycLIT (1974-1999), and Sociofile (1974-1998) were made. Authors of included trials were contacted for information on further trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised trials of individual psychodynamic psychotherapy or psychoanalysis for people with schizophrenia or severe mental illness (however defined) were selected. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were independently extracted by at least two reviewers. For dichotomous data relative risks (RR) were calculated and for continuous data weighted mean differences (WMD) between groups were calculated. MAIN RESULTS: No trials of a psychoanalytic approach were identified. Data are sparse for all comparisons involving a psychodynamic approach. There is no evidence of any positive effect of psychodynamic therapy and the possibility of adverse effects seems never to have been considered. The psychodynamic approach may be more acceptable to people than a more cognitive reality-adaptive therapy. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Current data do not support the use of psychodynamic psychotherapy techniques for hospitalised people with schizophrenia. If psychoanalytic therapy is being used for people with schizophrenia there is an urgent need for trials.

Humans↗

Carbamazepine for schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychoses.

BACKGROUND: A sizeable minority of people with schizophrenia do not have complete remission of symptoms. A variety of adjunctive treatments have been used to treat schizophrenia, carbamazepine being one. OBJECTIVES: To review the effects of carbamazepine and its derivatives for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychoses. SEARCH STRATEGY: Biological Abstracts (1980-1998), The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 1998), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of Trials (August 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998), PsycLIT (1886-1998) and PSYNDEX (1974-1998) were searched. Citations from included trials were also inspected and relevant companies and authors contacted for additional data. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials comparing carbamazepine, or compounds of the carbamazepine family, to placebo or no intervention, whether as sole treatment or as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication for the treatment of schizophrenia and/or schizoaffective psychoses. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Citations and, where possible, abstracts were independently inspected by reviewers, papers ordered, re-inspected and quality assessed. Data were extracted independently by at least two reviewers. Dichotomous data were analysed using Peto odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated. Where possible the number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm statistics were calculated. MAIN RESULTS: There is no clear effect of carbamazepine as the sole maintenance treatment for those with schizophrenia. Eight trials provided very limited data on the value of carbamazepine as an adjunct to antipsychotics. Studies were small and poorly reported. Currently no published data provides convincing evidence that adjunctive carbamazepine has an effect on global functioning, mental state, side effects or acceptability of treatment. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Based on currently available randomised trial-derived evidence, carbamazepine cannot be recommend for routine clinical use for treatment or augmentation of antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia. However, for those with a past history of being responsive to carbamazepine, or for those with associated EEG abnormalities, a trial of the drug may be warranted. More data is expected from trialists and the results of this review may be changed by their inclusion. At present large, simple well designed and reported trials are justified especially if focusing on those with both schizophrenia and EEG abnormalities or violent episodes and people with schizoaffective disorders.

Antimanic Agents↗

Genetic boundaries of the schizophrenia spectrum: evidence from the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: Identification of the genetically related disorders in the putative schizophrenia spectrum is an unresolved problem. Data from the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia, which was designed to disentangle genetic and environmental factors influencing risk for schizophrenia, were used to examine clinical phenotypes of schizophrenia spectrum disorders in adopted-away offspring of mothers with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. METHOD: Subjects were 190 adoptees at broadly defined genetic high risk who had biological mothers with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, including a subgroup of 137 adoptees at narrowly defined high risk whose mothers had DSM-III-R schizophrenia. These high-risk groups, followed to a median age of 44 years, were compared diagnostically with 192 low-risk adoptees whose biological mothers had either a non-schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis or no lifetime psychiatric diagnosis. RESULTS: In adoptees whose mothers had schizophrenia, the mean lifetime, age-corrected morbid risk for narrowly defined schizophrenia was 5.34% (SE=1.97%), compared to 1.74% (SE=1.00%) for low-risk adoptees, a marginally nonsignificant difference. In adoptees whose mothers had schizophrenia spectrum disorders, the mean age-corrected morbid risk for a schizophrenia spectrum disorder was 22.46% (SE=3.56%), compared with 4.36% (SE=1.51%) for low-risk adoptees, a significant difference. Within the comprehensive array of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, schizotypal personality disorder was found significantly more often in high-risk than in low-risk adoptees. The frequency of the group of nonschizophrenic nonaffective psychoses collectively differentiated high-risk and low-risk adoptees, but the frequencies of the separate disorders within this category did not. The two groups were not differentiated by the prevalence of paranoid personality disorder and of affective disorders with psychotic features. CONCLUSIONS: In adopted-away offspring of mothers with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, the genetic liability for schizophrenia-related illness (with the rearing contributions of the biological mothers disentangled) is broadly dispersed. Genetically oriented studies of schizophrenia-related disorders and studies of genotype-environment interaction should consider not only narrowly defined, typical schizophrenia but also schizotypal and schizoid personality disorders and nonschizophrenic nonaffective psychoses.

Adoption↗

Electroconvulsive therapy for schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) involves the induction of a seizure (fit) for therapeutic purposes by the administration of a low frequency electrical stimulus shock via electrodes applied to the scalp. At present it is used for those with schizophrenia but its effects are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) results in clinically meaningful benefit with regard to global improvement, hospitalisation, changes in mental state, behaviour and functioning in those with schizophrenia. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1982-1996), EMBASE (1980-1996), Medline (1966-1996), PsycLIT (1974-1996) and SCISEARCH (1996) were undertaken. The references of all identified studies were investigated. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials that compared ECT with placebo, 'sham ECT', non-pharmacological interventions and antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or chronic mental disorder. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The reviewers extracted the data independently and analysed the data on an intention to treat basis. MAIN RESULTS: Less people with schizophrenia treated with ECT showed no improvement in general functioning when compared to those given placebo in the short term (OR 0.48 CI 99% 0.26-0.90). This effect, however, does not last. However, ECT is less effective than antipsychotic drug treatment for those with schizophrenia. Limited evidence exists to suggest that combining antipsychotic drugs and ECT increases the rate and extent of clinical improvement, in the short term, in one out of every five to six people. The evidence for the efficacy of ECT in the medium to long term is equivocal. Electroconvulsive therapy is also more effective than the now obsolete insulin coma treatment. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence to support the use of ECT for those with schizophrenia for short term relief of symptoms. Electroconvulsive therapy may be advocated as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication for those with schizophrenia who show a limited response to medication alone but the evidence for this is not strong. In fact in spite of more than five decades of widespread clinical use, the administration of ECT to those with schizophrenia lacks a strong research base.

Electroconvulsive Therapy↗

Familial aggregation of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and obsessive-compulsive associated disorders in schizophrenia probands with and without OCD.

A substantial proportion of schizophrenia patients also has obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). To further validate the clinical validity of a schizo-obsessive diagnostic entity, we assessed morbid risks for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and OC-associated disorders in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia probands with and without OCD. Two groups of schizophrenia probands [with OCD (n = 57) and without OCD (n = 60)] and community-based controls (n = 50) were recruited. One hundred eighty two first-degree relatives of probands with OCD-schizophrenia, 210 relatives of non-OCD schizophrenia probands, and 165 relatives of community subjects were interviewed directly [59.3% (108/182), 51.9% (109/210), and 54.5% (90/165), respectively], using the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis-I DSM-IV Disorders and Axis II DSM-III-R Personality Disorders and the remaining relatives were interviewed indirectly, using the Family History Research Diagnostic Criteria. Relatives of OCD-schizophrenia probands had significantly higher morbid risks for OCD-schizophrenia (2.2% vs. 0%; P = 0.033) and OCPD (7.14% vs. 1.90%; P = 0.014), and a trend towards higher morbid risk for OCD (4.41% vs. 1.43%; P = 0.08) compared to relatives of non-OCD schizophrenia probands. When morbid risks for OCD, OCPD, and OCD-schizophrenia were pooled together, the significant between-group difference became robust (13.74% vs. 3.33%; P = 0.0002). In contrast, relatives of the two schizophrenia groups did not differ significantly in morbid risks for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, mood disorders, or substance abuse disorders. A differential aggregation of OC-associated disorders in relatives of OCD-schizophrenia versus non-OCD schizophrenia probands, provides further support for the validity of a putative OCD-schizophrenia ("schizo-obsessive") diagnostic entity.

Adult↗

Comparison of clinical characteristics and comorbidity in schizophrenia patients with and without obsessive-compulsive disorder: schizophrenic and OC symptoms in schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Since a substantial proportion of schizophrenia patients has symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), we sought to provide a phenomenological characterization of a schizophrenia subgroup with OCD. METHOD: A consecutive sample of patients who met DSM-IV criteria for both schizophrenia and OCD (N = 55) was compared with 55 schizophrenia patients without OCD matched for age and number of hospitalizations. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I psychiatric disorders (SCID-I), including a specific module for tic disorders based on DSM-IV criteria, Scales for the Assessment of Positive and Negative Symptoms, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, Clinical Global Impressions scale, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression were used. RESULTS: Schizophrenia patients with OCD (N = 55) had lower positive dimension scores than schizophrenia patients without OCD (N = 55) (p =.01). Two subgroups of schizo-obsessive patients were identified: OCD independent of schizophrenia symptoms and OCD partially overlapping positive schizophrenia symptoms. Schizophrenia patients with OCD had more SCID-detectable OCD-spectrum disorder, primarily body dysmorphic disorder and chronic tic disorders. More schizophrenia patients with OCD were treated with either add-on serotonin reuptake inhibitors or clozapine. CONCLUSION: Schizophrenia patients with OCD differ from their non-OCD-schizophrenia counterparts in severity of schizophrenia symptoms, co-occurrence of OCD-spectrum disorders, and pharmacotherapy. These findings and the identification of 2 subgroups of schizo-obsessive patients support the validity of this unique clinical entity and may facilitate the establishment of diagnostic criteria for a schizo-obsessive subtype of schizophrenia.

Adult↗

Cognitive behaviour therapy for schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Although medication is the mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia, always, some sort of informal or formal talking therapy is indicated. In cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) links are made between the person's feelings and patterns of thinking which underpin their distress. OBJECTIVES: To review the effects of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for those with schizophrenia compared to standard care, specific medication and non-intervention; also to review the effects of CBT for those with schizophrenia who are concurrently receiving standard care compared to no additional intervention to standard care, specific medication, additional drug interventions to standard care and other additional psychosocial interventions to standard care. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1980-1998), CINAHL (1982-1998), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of Trials (August 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998), PsycLIT (1887-1998), SIGLE (1990-1998), and Sociofile (1980-1998) were undertaken. All references of articles selected were searched for further relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of cognitive behaviour therapy for people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, possible schizophrenia or mental illnesses where specific diagnoses have not been employed. Outcomes such as death, metal state, relapse, psychological well-being and acceptability of treatment were sought. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were reliably selected and assessed for methodological quality. Data were extracted by two reviewers working independently. Dichotomous data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis and continuous data with 70% completion rate are presented. MAIN RESULTS: Four small trials were identified. All presented data suggested that there was a difference favouring CBT plus standard care over standard care alone in terms of reducing relapse rates (short term OR 0.31 CI 0.1-0.98; medium term OR 0.38 CI 0.17-0.83; long term OR 0.46 CI 0.26-0.83, NNT 6 CI 3-30). These findings were supported within the trials by scale-derived data. CBT, however, did not keep more people in care than a standard approach and there is no data relating to the effect of CBT on compliance with medication. One study also presented data on the effects of CBT when compared to supportive psychotherapy. No effect statistically significantly favoured either group but all were suggestive that the trial may have been underpowered to find an effect in favour of CBT. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The results of well conducted and reported ongoing trials are eagerly awaited. Currently, for those with schizophrenia willing to receive CBT, access to this treatment approach is associated with a substantially reduced risk of relapse. However, at present CBT is a fairly scarce commodity, often provided by highly skilled and experienced therapists. Therefore, its application in day to day practice may be restricted by the availability of suitable practitioners. Similarly, the present data provides little indication of how effective CBT procedures might be when they are applied by less experienced practitioners.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy↗

Chemistry, physiology and neuropsychology of schizophrenia: towards an earlier diagnosis of schizophrenia I.

Data supporting the glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia are presented. The glutamate hypothesis is linked to the dopamine hypothesis by the fact that dopamine synapses inhibit the release of glutamate in the striate and mesolimbic system. The glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia may open a way to find better drugs for treatment. The concept of schizophrenia I is described. It consists of "negative symptoms" such as disconcentration or reduction of energy. Schizophrenia I precedes and follows schizophrenia II with "positive symptoms," e.g. hallucinations and delusions. Schizophrenia I so far cannot be diagnosed as schizophrenia unless schizophrenia II appears. Chemical, physiological or neuropsychological methods for the diagnosis of schizophrenia I would render an earlier treatment of schizophrenia possible and thus make social and occupational rehabilitation more efficient. An objective diagnosis of schizophrenia I may also elucidate the mode of genetic transmission of schizophrenia. Several neuropsychological methods distinguish schizophrenic patients as a group from normals. Some of them are based on a specific disturbance of long term concentration. The EEG also distinguishes schizophrenics from normals when analyzed during voluntary movement. For schizophrenics it takes more effort to initiate a voluntary movement, and there are several features of the EEG correlated to this. Moreover, the longer motor reaction time of schizophrenics is paralleled by a longer duration of the Bereitschaftspotential in schizophrenia. Furthermore, there is a difference in the theta rhythm between schizophrenic patients and normals in a task which requires concentration. Some of the children of schizophrenic parents show a disturbance of concentration in both reaction time tasks and the d 2 test.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Child↗

Schizophrenia-related and affective personality disorder traits in relatives of probands with schizophrenia and personality disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The possible heterogeneity of the schizophrenia-related personality disorder traits associated with DSM-III criteria for schizotypal personality disorder was investigated using the family history method. A familial relationship to schizophrenia was hypothesized for schizophrenia-related personality disorder traits without coexisting affective personality disorder traits, pure schizophrenia-related personality disorder traits. Alternatively, a familial relationship with borderline personality disorder was hypothesized for schizophrenia-related personality disorder traits with comorbid affective personality disorder traits. METHOD: Criteria for schizophrenia-related and affective personality disorder traits were used to assess the 588 nonpsychotic first-degree relatives of 55 chronic schizophrenic probands and 67 probands with personality disorders. The probands with one or more DSM-III personality disorders were categorized as having schizotypal personality disorder without borderline personality disorder (pure schizotypal personality disorder), borderline personality disorder without schizotypal personality disorder (pure borderline personality disorder), both disorders, or neither. RESULTS: The morbid risk of all cases of schizophrenia-related personality disorder traits was higher in relatives of probands with schizophrenia and pure schizotypal personality disorder than in relatives of probands with neither schizotypal nor borderline personality disorder; however, it differed only slightly from that observed in the relatives of probands with both schizotypal and borderline personality disorders and pure borderline personality disorder. In contrast, the risk of pure schizophrenia-related personality disorder traits was higher in relatives of probands with schizophrenia and pure schizotypal personality disorder, while the risk of coexisting schizophrenia-related and affective personality disorder traits was lower in both of these groups than among the relatives of probands with both schizotypal and borderline personality disorders and pure borderline personality disorder. CONCLUSIONS: These results offer preliminary indications that schizotypal personality disorder features present without comorbid affective personality disorder traits may more specifically characterize the personality characteristics familially related to schizophrenia. Furthermore, they indicate that schizotypal personality disorder features as currently defined are found in relatives of patients other than those with schizophrenia or schizotypal personality disorder.

Adult↗