Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ropivacaine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a comparison of 0.2% ropivacaine, 0.1% ropivacaine, and 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine is recommended by the manufacturer for labor analgesia, but lower concentrations may be effective. The objective of this study was to compare 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.2% ropivacaine and to examine the effect of addition of fentanyl. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind study, 58 nulliparous laboring parturients had epidural analgesia established with 0.2% ropivacaine and were then randomized to receive one of the following epidural infusions at 10 mL/h: 0.2% ropivacaine (group R2, n = 19), 0.1% ropivacaine (group R1, n = 19), or 0.1% ropivacaine with 2 microg/mL fentanyl (group RF, n = 20). Supplementary analgesia was provided on request with 5-mL boluses of 0.2% ropivacaine. RESULTS: All solutions provided effective analgesia during early labor, with all groups requiring similar numbers of supplementary top-ups. Visual analog pain scores in groups R2 and RF were equivalent and lower than in group R1 (P =.006). Hypotension was more frequent in group RF compared with groups R2 and R1 (P =.014). Patient and midwife satisfaction and obstetric and neonatal outcomes were similar among groups. Maternal venous plasma concentrations of ropivacaine were greater in group R2 compared with groups R1 and RF (P =.008), but umbilical venous concentrations were similar. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that epidural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine alone at 10 mL/h provided adequate analgesia in the first stage of labor, and that the addition of 2 microg/mL fentanyl to that concentration improved analgesia to a quality similar to 0.2% ropivacaine alone.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of ropivacaine, 3-hydroxy-ropivacaine, 4-hydroxy-ropivacaine and 2',6'-pipecoloxylidide in plasma.

A sensitive HPLC method has been developed for the determination of ropivacaine, 3-hydroxy-ropivacaine, 4-hydroxy-ropivacaine and 2',6'-pipecoloxylidide in plasma. The procedure involved extraction from plasma with a mixture of n-heptane-ethyl acetate and a back-extraction into an acidified aqueous solution. The chromatography was achieved using a LiChrospher RPB C8 column with a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of acetonitrile and pH 2.1, 0.01 M potassium dihydrogenphosphate, the latter phase containing 0.005 M 1-heptanesulfonic acid for ropivacaine metabolites analysis. The extraction yields of ropivacaine, 3-hydroxy-ropivacaine, 4-hydroxy-ropivacaine and 2',6'-pipecoloxylidide were 94.7%, 79.4%, 79.4% and 77.7%, respectively. The limits of detection of ropivacaine, 3-hydroxy-ropivacaine, 4-hydroxy-ropivacaine and 2',6'-pipecoloxylidide in plasma samples were 0.9 ng/ml, 3 ng/ml, 5 ng/ml and 1 ng/ml, respectively.

Amides↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of caudal ropivacaine, ropivacaine plus ketamine and ropivacaine plus tramadol administration for postoperative analgesia in children.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of single-dose caudal ropivacaine, ropivacaine plus ketamine and ropivacaine plus tramadol in children for postoperative pain management. METHODS: Following ethics committee approval and informed parental consent, 99 ASA PS I or II children, between 1 and 10 years of age, scheduled for elective inguinal hernia repair with general anaesthesia, were recruited. After induction of anaesthesia and placement of a laryngeal mask airway (LMATM), the patients were randomly divided into three groups to receive either caudal ropivacaine alone (0.4%, 2 mg x kg(-1)) in group R (n = 32) or ropivacaine (0.2%, 1 mg x kg(-1)) plus ketamine (0.25 mg x kg(-1)) in group RK (n = 33) or ropivacaine (0.2%, 1 mg x kg(-1)) plus tramadol (1 mg x kg(-1)) in group RT (n = 34) with a total volume of 0.5 ml x kg(-1). Systemic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate (HR), peripheral O2 saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), sedation and pain scores were recorded at 5, 10, 15 and 30 min, 1, 3, 4 and 6 h following recovery from anaesthesia. Pain was evaluated by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale, and sedation with a five-point sedation test. RESULTS: No difference was found regarding age, weight and duration of operation between the groups (P > 0.05). No patient experienced hypotension, bradycardia or respiratory depression. Duration of analgesia was longer in group RT (1377 +/- 204 min) than group R (1006 +/- 506 min) (P = 0.001). In the tramadol group, fewer patients required supplementary analgesics in the first 24 h (P = 0.005). Sedation scores were below 2 in all groups. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in group RT (eight patients) and group RK (seven patients) than group R (one patient, P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Ropivacaine (0.4%), ropivacaine (0.2%) plus ketamine (0.25 mg x kg(-1)) and ropivacaine (0.2%) plus tramadol (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) provided sufficient analgesia in children, but the duration of analgesia was longer in the RT group.

Amides↗
PubMed2005

[Comparison of ropivacaine, ropivacaine plus tramadol and ropivacaine plus morphine in patients undergoing minor hand surgery].

In our study we aimed to compare the effects of ropivacaine alone, ropivacaine plus tramadol HCl, and ropivacaine plus morphine HCl used as intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA), on duration to the initiation of analgesia, total analgesia time, analgesic requirement, sedation levels and hemodynamic parameters. 53 patients undergoing minor hand surgery were included into the study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups to receive 40 ml of ropivacaine 0.2 % (Group R, n=18), ropivacaine 0.2 % plus 1 mg/kg tramadol HCl (Group RT, n=18), and ropivacaine 0.2 % plus 0.1 mg/kg morphine HCl (Group RM, n=17) as IVRA. Following the injection, the durations for the initiation of analgesia were recorded. Levels of sedation, analgesia (VAS) and hemodynamic parameters were recorded in 5 minute intervals throughout first 35 minutes intraoperatively and at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60th minutes postoperatively. Patients were asked about the initiation of pain and requirements of analgesic at the first postoperative day. The duration to the initiation of analgesia was similar between the groups. Total analgesia time was found to be 304.0 +/- 317.6 min in Group R, 327.0 +/- 316.5 min in Group RT, and 635.9 +/- 492.3 min in Group RM. The difference between Group R and RM was statistically significant (p<0.05). Analgesic requirements were similar between the groups (p>0.05). Mild local anesthetic toxicity was observed in Group RM in two patients. We conclude that, when used as IVRA, ropivacaine alone or with tramadol or morphine produced similar analgesia and surgery conditions, and ropivacaine plus morphine had more adverse effects besides its longer duration of analgesia.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Epidural ropivacaine or sufentanil-ropivacaine infusions for post-thoracotomy pain.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of continuous epidural infusions of ropivacaine and ropivacaine-sufentanil mixtures after thoracotomy. METHODS: Sixty-two patients scheduled for thoracic surgery were allocated in this prospective double-blinded randomised study. They received an epidural catheter inserted from thoracic 5-6 (Th(5-6)) interspace a day before surgery and were randomly assigned into two groups, sufentanil-ropivacaine group (Group SR, n=31) and ropivacaine group (Group R, n=31). Bolus dose of the study drugs, ropivacaine 0.2% or ropivacaine 0.2% and sufentanil 0.75 microg/ml calculated in ml according to the patient's height was given through the epidural catheter before surgery. One hour after anaesthesia induction, another bolus was given and the epidural infusion was started (4.5-8 ml). Whenever visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were > or =4 during function, the patients received additional boluses and the infusion rate was increased by 1 ml/h. If the pain was not relieved after administration of two boluses, the patient was excluded from the study. RESULTS: VAS at rest and during function was lower in ropivacaine-sufentanil group and the need for additional boluses and infusion rate increase was high in ropivacaine group (P<0.05). Ropivacaine-sufentanil infusion rate was decreased due to nausea and vomiting in two patients and due to CO(2) retention in one patient. There was no statistically significant difference between the incidences of side effects except pruritus significantly higher in Group SR. The total epidural solution volume was more in Group R (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine with sufentanil provided superior pain relief than ropivacaine alone without causing any severe side effect or post-operative pulmonary impairment.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Intrathecal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine plus fentanyl for out-patient arthroscopic knee surgery.

We evaluated the effects of low-dose intrathecal ropivacaine with or without fentanyl for arthroscopic knee surgery. Fifty patients were randomized in equal groups to receive an intrathecal solution (3 ml) containing either 10 mg isobaric ropivacaine or 8 mg isobaric ropivacaine plus 25 pg fentanyl. Complete motor blockade occurred in 22 patients (88%) in both groups. The time taken to reach sensory blockade to T10 and total motor blockade was shorter in the ropivacaine-treated group, but differences were not statistically significant. The duration of sensory and motor blockade was shorter in the ropivacaine plus fentanyl-treated group. The cephalad spread of sensory blockade was higher with ropivacaine than with ropivacaine plus fentanyl. We conclude that although 25 microg fentanyl added to 8 mg ropivacaine provided shorter motor and sensory blockade durations than 10 mg ropivacaine alone, small doses of ropivacaine plus fentanyl can be used safely for arthroscopic knee surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A clinical comparison of ropivacaine 0.75%, ropivacaine 1% or bupivacaine 0.5% for interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia.

In order to compare interscalene brachial plexus block performed with ropivacaine or bupivacaine, 45 healthy, unpremedicated patients, undergoing elective shoulder surgery, were randomly allocated to receive interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 20 mL of either ropivacaine 0.75% (n = 15), ropivacaine 1% (n = 15), or bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 15). Readiness for surgery (loss of pinprick sensation from C4 to C7 and inability to elevate the limb from the bed) was achieved later with bupivacaine 0.5% (28 +/- 15 min) than with ropivacaine 1% (10 +/- 5 min) (P = 0.005) and ropivacaine 0.75% (15 +/- 8 min) (P = 0.0005). No differences in success rate were observed between the three groups; however, seven patients receiving bupivacaine 0.5% required intra-operative analgesic supplementation (fentanyl 0.1 mg intravenous) compared with one patient receiving ropivacaine 0.75%, and two patients treated with ropivacaine 1% (P = 0.02). The time from the block placement to first request for pain medication was similar in the three groups (10.7 +/- 2 h, 11 +/- 2.4 h, and 10.9 +/- 3.9 h after 0.75% and 1% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine, respectively). We conclude that interscalene brachial plexus block performed with 20 mL of either 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine allows for a prolonged post-operative pain relief, similar to that provided by bupivacaine 0.5%, with short onset time of surgical anaesthesia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, and 0.75% ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block.

UNLABELLED: The onset time and duration of action of ropivacaine during an interscalene block are not known. The potentially improved safety profile of ropivacaine may allow the use of higher concentrations to try and speed onset time. We compared bupivacaine and ropivacaine to determine the optimal long-acting local anesthetic and concentration for interscalene brachial plexus block. Seventy-five adult patients scheduled for outpatient shoulder surgery under interscalene block were entered into this double-blind, randomized study. Patients were assigned (n = 25 per group) to receive an interscalene block using 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, or 0.75% ropivacaine. All solutions contained fresh epinephrine in a 1:400,000 concentration. At 1-min intervals after local anesthetic injection, patients were assessed to determine loss of shoulder abduction and loss of pinprick in the C5-6 dermatomes. Before discharge, patients were asked to document the time of first oral narcotic use, when incisional discomfort began, and when full sensation returned to the shoulder. The mean onset time of both motor and sensory blockade was <6 min in all groups. Duration of sensory blockade was similar in all groups as defined by the three recovery measures. We conclude that there is no clinically important difference in times to onset and recovery of interscalene block for bupivacaine 0.5%, ropivacaine 0.5%, and ropivacaine 0.75% when injected in equal volumes. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we demonstrated a similar efficacy between equal concentrations of ropivacaine and bupivacaine. In addition, increasing the concentration of ropivacaine from 0.5% to 0.75% fails to improve the onset or duration of interscalene brachial plexus block.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Ropivacaine 0.15% plus sufentanil 0.5 microg/mL and ropivacaine 0.10% plus sufentanil 0.5 microg/mL are equivalent for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor.

UNLABELLED: We compared the administration of 0.15% ropivacaine plus 0.5 microg/mL of sufentanil with that of 0.10% ropivacaine plus 0.5 microg/mL of sufentanil for labor analgesia with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) to determine whether a decreased concentration of ropivacaine could produce equally effective analgesia. One-hundred-thirty healthy pregnant women at term were randomized in a double-blinded fashion. The PCEA settings were as follows: 12-mL initial bolus, 5-mL bolus dose, 5-min lockout interval, and 10 mL/h basal infusion. Patient demographics and labor characteristics were comparable in both groups. No differences were observed for pain scores, maternal satisfaction, volume of anesthetic solution administered, number of boluses requested and delivered, need for supplemental boluses, mode of delivery, motor block, side effects, or Apgar scores. Patients in the 0.10% ropivacaine group used significantly less drug than those in the 0.15% group (mean, 57 mg; 95% confidence interval, 50.5-63.5 mg; versus mean, 88.0 mg; 95% confidence interval, 74.4-93.3 mg, respectively; P < 0.0001). Ropivacaine 0.10% plus 0.5 microg/mL of sufentanil administered via PCEA for labor analgesia is equally effective as ropivacaine 0.15% plus 0.5 microg/mL of sufentanil, with a 30% local anesthetic-sparing effect and a 40% reduction in cost. However, this reduction in local anesthetic is not associated with a decrease in the incidence of motor block, side effects, or instrumental deliveries. IMPLICATIONS: Ropivacaine 0.10% plus 0.5 microg/mL of sufentanil given via patient-controlled epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia is equally as effective as ropivacaine 0.15% plus 0.5 microg/mL of sufentanil, with a 30% local anesthetic-sparing effect and a 40% reduction in cost. This reduction in ropivacaine concentration is not associated with a decrease in the incidence of motor block, side effects, or instrumental deliveries.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Addition of epinephrine to epidural ropivacaine during labour--effects on onset and duration of action, efficacy, and systemic absorption of ropivacaine.

Addition of epinephrine to epidural anaesthetic solutions may enhance efficacy and duration of analgesia. We postulated that addition of epinephrine 5 microg.mL(-1) to epidural ropivacaine would improve efficacy, decrease systemic absorption and reduce neonatal effects. Twenty-one multiparous women were studied. An initial dose of ropivacaine 30 mg followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 10 mg.h(-1) was given via a lumbar epidural catheter. According to random allocation, epinephrine 5 microg.mL(-1) was added to ropivacaine. Ropivacaine concentrations were measured in maternal venous plasma after one hour of infusion and in both umbilical venous and maternal plasma at delivery. Neonatal neurologic and adaptive capacity score (NACS) tests were performed at 2 and 24 h postpartum. All women delivered vaginally. The groups had similar ropivacaine dose requirements, epidural-delivery intervals and satisfaction scores. Bromage scores for motor block were greater in the epinephrine group (2; range: 1-3) than controls (1; range: 0-2). Mean plasma ropivacaine concentrations (+/-SD) were less in the epinephrine group (0.17 +/- 0.05 mg.L(-1), n = 10) than controls (0.31 +/- 0.14 mg.L(-1), n = 11; P < 0.05) after one h of infusion but not at delivery. UV ropivacaine concentrations and NACS scores were similar in the two groups. The addition of epinephrine to ropivacaine decreases maternal plasma concentrations after one h of epidural infusion but also increases motor block.

Clinical Trial↗
PubMed2000

[0.2% ropivacaine vs. 0.1% ropivacaine plus fentanyl in obstetric epidural analgesia].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic efficacy of epidural administration of 0.2% ropivacaine alone to that of 0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.0002% fentanyl during childbirth. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized single-blind study of 84 women in labor (aged 16 to 40 y, ASA I-II, weight over 110 kg, height over 150 cm, gestational age 37 to 42 weeks). The women were randomly assigned to two groups: group I consisted of 42 patients who received an initial bolus of 10 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% followed by continuous perfusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at a rate of 6 to 10 ml/h; group II was composed of 42 women who received an initial bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% with 50 micrograms of fentanyl followed by continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% and fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml at a rate of 6 to 10 ml/h. Data recorded were parity and type of delivery, blood pressure, heart rate (HR), time to onset of pain relief, motor blockade on a modified Bromage scale, pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) and fetal HR, Apgar score and arterial and venous pH of umbilical blood. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in demographic or hemodynamic data in mothers or fetuses, in type of delivery or motor block, although the latter tended to be slightly lower in group II. In group II, the total anesthetic dose used was significantly lower (p = 0.003); time until onset of pain relief was significantly shorter (p = 0.044); and VAS scores were significantly lower at 15 min (p = 0.005), 30 min (p = 0.029), 60 min (p = 0.017) and 90 min (p = 0.002). The number of top-up boluses needed for deliveries involving instruments was significantly greater in group II (p = 0.37). CONCLUSION: The protocol of ropivacaine 0.1% with 2 micrograms/ml of fentanyl provides satisfactory analgesia throughout labor, allowing lower doses of local anesthetic to be used, with shorter onset of pain relief and reduced motor blockade; however the analgesia provided is insufficient for deliveries assisted by instruments.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Intraoperative single-shot "3-in-1" femoral nerve block with ropivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.5% or bupivacaine 0.25% provides comparable 48-hr analgesia after unilateral total knee replacement.

PURPOSE: To compare analgesia after intraoperative single shot "3-in-1" femoral nerve block (FNB) in combination with general anesthesia using ropivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.5% with bupivacaine 0.25% for total knee replacement (TKR). METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind study in 48 patients for elective TKR under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized to one of four groups (C: sham block, R1: "3-in-1" FNB using 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.25%, R2: "3-in-1" FNB using 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.5%, B: "3-in-1" FNB using 30 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%). Verbal pain score (VPS) both at rest and movement were assessed for 48 hr after TKR (0=none; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe). Total morphine consumption and its associated side effects, duration of hospitalization after operation were also compared. RESULTS: There were no differences in patients' physical characteristics, intraoperative morphine usage, operation time, tourniquet time or length of hospitalization between the four groups. When compared with group C, the VPS was significantly lower in groups R1, R2 and B at one, four, eight, 24 and 48 hr after TKR (P <0.05). The morphine requirement of groups R1, R2 and B were also significantly lower when comparing with group C up to 48 hr postoperatively (P <0.05). There were no significant differences in VPS and postoperative morphine requirement at any time between groups R1, R2 and B. CONCLUSION: "3-in-1" FNB with ropivacaine provided analgesia that was clinically comparable to that of bupivacaine up to 48 hr after TKR. Increasing the concentration of ropivacaine from 0.25% to 0.5% failed to improve the postoperative analgesia of "3-in-1" FNB.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy of intra-articular bupivacaine, ropivacaine, or a combination of ropivacaine, morphine, and ketorolac on postoperative pain relief after ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery: a randomized double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Effective pain relief is important after diagnostic and therapeutic arthroscopic knee surgery to permit early discharge and improve comfort and mobility at home. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of bupivacaine, ropivacaine, or a combination of ropivacaine, morphine, and ketorolac injected intra-articularly for postoperative pain relief after arthroscopic knee surgery. METHODS: Sixty-three healthy patients undergoing knee arthroscopy under local anesthesia (LA) were randomized to receive 1 of the following substances intra-articularly postoperatively: group B: 30 mL of bupivacaine (150 mg); group R: 30 mL of ropivacaine (150 mg); and group RMK: ropivacaine 150 mg, morphine 4 mg, and ketorolac 30 mg in normal saline (total volume 30 mL). Oral paracetamol 1g and tramadol 50 mg were used as rescue drugs. Postoperatively, pain was assessed at rest and movement, and side effects were recorded. The patients were asked to self-assess pain for 7 days and record analgesic consumption as well as activities of daily living (ADLs). Plasma concentration of LA was measured in another 8 patients. RESULTS: All groups had excellent analgesia at 0 and 4 hours postoperatively. Group RMK had significantly lower visual analog pain score at rest at 8 hours and during movement at 8 and 24 hours compared with the other groups (P<.05). Group RMK required less paracetamol and tramadol on day 1 (P<.05), had less sleep disturbances because of pain, more patients were ready to work on days 1 and 2 (P<.05), and were more satisfied on days 1 and 4 to 7. Postoperatively, plasma concentrations of ropivacaine and lidocaine were far below known systemic toxic concentrations in all patients. CONCLUSION: Addition of morphine and ketolorac to ropivacaine intra-articularly enhances analgesic efficacy of LA, reduces postdischarge analgesic consumption, and improves ADLs without increasing side effects after ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed2005

Postoperative extradural analgesia with morphine and ropivacaine. A double-blind comparison between placebo and ropivacaine 10 mg/h or 16 mg/h.

BACKGROUND: Some controversy exists in the literature on the benefit of epidurals compared to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA). Also, the dose of ropivacaine for epidural analgesia when combined with morphine remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the epidural vs. PCA technique and high-dose vs. low-dose ropivacaine combined with morphine during knee replacement surgery. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, postoperative pain relief with a combination of epidural ropivacaine (Group L: 10 mg h-1, Group H: 16 mg h-1) and morphine (0.16 mg h-1) was evaluated in 30 patients. A placebo group (Group PL) of 15 patients having PCA morphine served as the control. Visual analog pain (VAS), morphine consumption, sensory and motor block and side-effects were recorded during 48 h. RESULTS: VAS scores at rest were significantly lower in Groups L and H compared to Group PL. On movement, Group H had lower VAS scores than Group PL during 3-27 h (P<0.05) and Group L during 4-9 h (P<0.05), while Group L had lower a VAS than Group PL during 9-18 h (P<0.05). Morphine consumption after 48 h was greater in Group PL (64.6+/-36.3 mg) vs. Group L (23.3+/-33.9 mg) (P<0.001) and Group H (4.3+/-9.6 mg) (P<0.0001). Mild motor block was seen in Group H in 20% and 14% patients at 24 h and 48 h, respectively, but time to mobilization was similar between the groups. Pruritus was more common in the ropivacaine groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Lumbar epidural analgesia using a combination of ropivacaine (16 mg h-1) and morphine (0.16 mg h-1) provides superior analgesia compared to the PCA technique or ropivacaine (10 mg h-1) and morphine (0.16 mg h-1). Although this resulted in a mild motor block during the first 12 h, patient mobilization was similar in all groups.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Efficacy of ropivacaine compared with ropivacaine plus sufentanil for postoperative analgesia after major knee surgery.

This study compared the analgesic efficacy of an epidural infusion of ropivacaine and ropivacaine with sufentanil following major knee surgery. In a double-blind clinical trial, 115 adult patients received either epidural ropivacaine (R group, 2 mg.ml(-1)), or ropivacaine (2 mg.ml(-1)) with sufentanil (RS group, 1 microg.ml(-1)), using a patient-controlled epidural analgesia technique. Pain scores (visual analogue scale, VAS, and the simple descriptive scale, SDS), side-effects, motor block and treatment quality were recorded at 6, 12 and 24 h after the insertion of the epidural catheter. In the RS group, analgesic efficacy was significantly greater than in the R group between 12 and 24 h following insertion of the epidural catheter (VAS: 92.9% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.009). There was no significant difference during the other periods. Pruritus, nausea and vomiting were significantly more frequent in the RS group. Good postoperative analgesia was obtained with an epidural infusion of ropivacaine (2 mg.ml(-1)). When this local anaesthetic was administered with sufentanil, there was an improvement in the analgesic effect but a significant increase in the number of patients who reported adverse effects. The differences were more pronounced 12 h after the beginning of the analgesic schedule. This study failed to demonstrate any worthwhile clinical benefit from the addition of sufentanil.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Minimum local analgesic dose of plain ropivacaine vs. ropivacaine combined with sufentanil during epidural analgesia for labour.

We have used the up-and-down allocation technique to assess the relative analgesic potencies of epidural ropivacaine alone and ropivacaine combined with sufentanil 0.75 microg.ml-1 in 42 women requesting epidural analgesia in the first stage of labour. Parturients were randomly allocated to one of the two epidural solutions in a double-blind manner. The concentration of local anaesthetic was determined by the response of the previous parturient: an effective concentration (pain < or = 10 mm on a 10-cm visual analogue pain score within 30 min) resulted in a 0.01% decrease in the concentration of ropivacaine for the next parturient, an ineffective concentration resulted in a 0.01% increase. Minimum local analgesic concentration of ropivacaine alone was 0.13% (95% CI 0.12-0.13%) compared with 0.09% (95% CI 0.08-0.1%) for ropivacaine with sufentanil (p < 0.00001).

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Duration and quality of postoperative analgesia after brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery: ropivacaine 0.5% versus ropivacaine 0.5% plus clonidine].

OBJECTIVES: Some authors have found that nerve blocks with local anesthetics may last longer if clonidine is added. The present study analyzed the duration and quality of analgesia provided by an interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery using 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine with added clonidine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were assigned to two groups for double-blind study. The block was performed with 0.5% ropivacaine (40 mL) in group A and with 0.5% ropivacaine (40 mL) and clonidine (40 micrograms) in group B. General anesthesia was provided with propofol in continuous perfusion. Ventilation was spontaneous through a laryngeal mask. After stimulation of the brachial plexus nerves, the anesthesiology administered the assigned drug or drugs. The patient was instructed to remember the time of reversion of the sensory-motor block. Postoperative analgesia was assessed on a visual analog scale at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours. RESULTS: The mean times until reversion of the sensory-motor block and the assessments of pain at 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours in the two groups were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Adding 40 micrograms of clonidine to 200 mg of 0.5% ropivacaine does not prolong the sensory-motor block or improve the quality of analgesia in the early postoperative period.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed2004

The postoperative analgesic efficacy of wound instillation with ropivacaine 0.1% versus ropivacaine 0.2%.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of ropivacaine concentration on wound instillation-induced postoperative analgesia following total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Large referral hospital. PATIENTS: 40 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. INTERVENTIONS: A standard general anesthetic was administered. In all cases surgery was performed via a Pfannenstiel incision. On completion of the surgery, a multi-orifice, 20-gauge epidural catheter was placed above the fascia such that the tip was sited at the point that demarcated 50% of the length of the surgical wound. Thereafter, the catheter was connected to an electronic patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device programmed to deliver 9 mL of drug, with a lockout time of 60 minutes and no basal infusion. Patients were randomized to receive PCA with ropivacaine 0.1% (Group 0.1) or ropivacaine 0.2% (Group 0.2). During the first 6 postoperative hours, a co-investigator administered "rescue" morphine (2 mg IV). Thereafter, "rescue" meperidine 1 mg/kg was administered on patient request. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The number of attempts to activate the PCA device and actual PCA instillations during the 24 hour study period were similar between the groups. The number of 2 mg "rescue" morphine dosages administered was 4.3 +/- 1.7 versus 4.4 +/- 2.5 for the Group 0.1 and Group 0.2, respectively. For Group 0.1 and Group 0.2, the total dose of "rescue" morphine administered during the first 6 postoperative hours was 8.7 mg +/- 3.6 versus 9.1 mg +/- 5, respectively. "Rescue" meperidine administration during the subsequent 18 hours was similar between the groups. Throughout the study period, pain scores were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: With a pre-set volume, varying the concentration of ropivacaine (0.1% versus 0.2%) does not affect the analgesic efficacy of wound instillation following total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Amides↗