Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Risperidone”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Serum concentrations of risperidone and 9-OH risperidone following intramuscular injection of long-acting risperidone compared with oral risperidone medication.

OBJECTIVE: To compare serum concentrations of risperidone, 9-hydroxy (OH) risperidone and risperidone plus 9-OH risperidone, as well as the 9-OH risperidone/risperidone ratio in patients receiving depot and oral risperidone. METHOD: Serum concentrations from 78 patients receiving three different doses of risperidone depot were measured and compared with serum concentrations from 82 patients taking three different doses of oral risperidone. RESULTS: Patients receiving risperidone depot had significantly lower serum concentrations of risperidone plus 9-OH risperidone than patients taking oral risperidone. More interestingly, the 9-OH risperidone/risperidone ratio was also significantly lower in patients receiving risperidone depot than in patients taking oral risperidone. CONCLUSION: Serum concentrations of risperidone plus 9-OH risperidone may be a rather poor indication of the antipsychotic efficacy of risperidone unless their ratio is also considered.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Risperidone versus typical antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: The 'conventional' neuroleptic drugs, such as haloperidol and chlorpromazine, are frequently used as the first line treatment for people with schizophrenia. However, about 5-25% of these people show poor response to these treatments and side effects often makes compliance with the 'older generation' of drug treatment problematic. Although the efficacy of these medications with respect to 'positive' symptoms is well described, little evidence exists that 'conventional' antipsychotic treatment has any effect on the 'negative' symptoms of schizophrenia. Risperidone is one of the 'new generation' neuroleptic compounds. As well as its reputed tendency to cause fewer movement disorders it is claimed that risperidone may improve negative symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of risperidone for schizophrenia in comparison to 'conventional' neuroleptic drugs. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1980-1997), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (1997), The Cochrane Library (1997, Issue1), EMBASE (1980-1997), MEDLINE (1966-1997), PsycLIT (1974-1997), and SCISEARCH (1997) were undertaken. References of all identified studies were searched for further trial citations. Pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised trials comparing risperidone to any 'conventional' neuroleptic treatment for those with schizophrenia or other serious mental illnesses. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Citations and, where possible, abstracts were independently inspected by reviewers, papers ordered, re-inspected and quality assessed. Data were also independently extracted. Sensitivity analyses on dose of risperidone, haloperidol and duration of illness were undertaken for the primary outcomes of clinical improvement, side effects (movement disorders) and acceptability of treatment. For homogeneous dichotomous data the odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve short-term studies and two long term studies provided data on 3401 people. This review provides no evidence relating to the effect of risperidone on cognitive or social functioning, quality of life, employment status, discharge from hospital and relapse rates. Risperidone increases the odds of moderate clinical improvement (OR 0.65, CI 0.55-0.77, NNT 10, CI 7-16). It appears to have little or no additional effect on the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia but did have less tendency to cause movement disorders, largely in comparison with haloperidol (OR 0.43, CI 0.34-0.55, NNT 7, CI 5-10) for use of antiparkinsonian medication. Risperidone seems to be more acceptable to those with schizophrenia (OR 0.69 CI 0.57-0.83, NNT 15, CI 10-30, 30% baseline risk of dropping out). Those taking risperidone are also marginally less likely to experience somnolence (OR 0.78, CI 0. 61-0.99, NNT 22). Weight gain, however, is more likely with risperidone (OR 1.51 CI 1.14-2.00, NNT 13). Funnel plots show that smaller studies generally show greater benefit for risperidone than larger studies. A publication bias in favour of risperidone amongst the included studies may explain this effect. Sensitivity analyses on dose of risperidone (excluding those receiving 1 or 2 mg) did not materially change the results for the principal outcomes. Excluding data from those on higher doses of haloperidol (>10mg/day) does marginally change the results. Risperidone is less effective in achieving clinical improvement and preventing dropout but outcomes relating to movement disorders change little. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Little can be concluded about the long term effects of risperidone and generalising results beyond a comparison with haloperidol would be imprudent. Risperidone may be more acceptable to those with schizophrenia and have marginal benefits in terms of limited clinical improvement and side

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMed1994

Regional brain distribution of risperidone and its active metabolite 9-hydroxy-risperidone in the rat.

Risperidone is a new benzisoxazole antipsychotic. 9-Hydroxy-risperidone is the major plasma metabolite of risperidone. The pharmacological properties of 9-hydroxy-risperidone were studied and appeared to be comparable to those of risperidone itself, both in respect of the profile of interactions with various neurotransmitters and its potency, activity, and onset and duration of action. The absorption, plasma levels and regional brain distribution of risperidone, metabolically formed 9-hydroxy-risperidone and total radioactivity were studied in the male Wistar rat after single subcutaneous administration of radiolabelled risperidone at 0.02 mg/kg. Concentrations were determined by HPLC separation, and off-line determination of the radioactivity with liquid scintillation counting. Risperidone was well absorbed. Maximum plasma concentrations were reached at 0.5-1 h after subcutaneous administration. Plasma concentrations of 9-hydroxy-risperidone were higher than those of risperidone from 2h after dosing. In plasma, the apparent elimination half-life of risperidone was 1.0 h, and mean residence times were 1.5 h for risperidone and 2.5 h for its 9-hydroxy metabolite. Plasma levels of the radioactivity increased dose proportionally between 0.02 and 1.3 mg/kg. Risperidone was rapidly distributed to brain tissues. The elimination of the radioactivity from the frontal cortex and striatum--brain regions with high concentrations of 5-HT2 or dopamine-D2 receptors--became more gradual with decreasing dose levels. After a subcutaneous dose of 0.02 mg/kg, the ED50 for central 5-HT2 antagonism in male rats, half-lives in frontal cortex and striatum were 3-4 h for risperidone, whereas mean residence times were 4-6 h for risperidone and about 12 h for 9-hydroxy-risperidone. These half-lives and mean residence times were 3-5 times longer than in plasma and in cerebellum, a region with very low concentrations of 5-HT2 and D2 receptors. Frontal cortex and striatum to plasma concentration ratios increased during the experiment. The distribution of 9-hydroxy-risperidone to the different brain regions, including frontal cortex and striatum, was more limited than that of risperidone itself. This indicated that 9-hydroxy-risperidone contributes to the in vivo activity of risperidone, but to a smaller extent than would be predicted from plasma levels. AUCs of both active compounds in frontal cortex and striatum were 10-18 times higher than those in cerebellum. No retention of metabolites other than 9-hydroxy-risperidone was observed in any of the brain regions investigated.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Risperidone use at a state hospital: a clinical audit 2 years after the first wave of risperidone prescriptions.

BACKGROUND: In spite of some inherent limitations, naturalistic data can provide information on populations that have greater heterogeneity than can controlled clinical trials and on functional outcomes that may be especially important in clinical practice. In the present retrospective naturalistic study, we evaluated key clinical outcomes among the first wave of risperidone-treated patients at a state psychiatric hospital. METHOD: Outcome data were extracted from the charts of 142 patients 2 years after initiation of treatment with risperidone. Their diagnoses included DSM-III-R schizophrenia (57%), schizoaffective disorder (22%), dementia and other organic conditions (7%), bipolar disorder (5%), and other psychiatric disorders (9%). RESULTS: During the 2-year period, 92 of 142 patients were discharged from the hospital: 61 (43%) were discharged on risperidone treatment and 31 (22%) were discharged on treatment with other drugs. At the time of the study, 50 of 142 patients were still in the hospital: of these, 18 (13%) were still receiving risperidone. The modal maximum daily dose of risperidone was 4.1 mg in patients discharged on risperidone treatment and 7.5 mg in patients still in the hospital. All groups were granted more ward privileges after starting risperidone, the most being granted to patients discharged from the hospital on risperidone treatment (p<.05 versus patients discharged on treatment with other drugs) and those still receiving risperidone in the hospital. Significantly fewer patients discharged on risperidone treatment than on treatment with other drugs were readmitted to the hospital within 2 years after discharge (p<.01). CONCLUSION: Improved privilege levels and a reduced readmission rate indicate that risperidone was an effective antipsychotic agent among a heterogeneous patient population in a state hospital. These factors may be especially important to justify use of this agent in the current fiscal climate.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

In vitro effects of risperidone and 9-hydroxy-risperidone on human platelet function, plasma coagulation, and fibrinolysis.

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic events have been reported with the use of antipsychotic compounds, although the incidence, predisposing factors, and biological mechanisms associated with these events in psychiatric patients are subject to debate. OBJECTIVE: The in vitro actions of risperidone and its active metabolite 9-hydroxy-risperidone (9-OH-risperidone) on human platelet function, plasma coagulation, and fibrinolysis were examined to explore whether hematologic effects might be a mechanism for thrombotic events with these compounds. METHODS: Blood was donated by healthy white male subjects who were free of medications (particularly acetylsalicylic acid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory compounds). Platelet shape change and adhesion/aggregation reactions to risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen, epinephrine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) were tested in human platelet-rich plasma. Arachidonic acid metabolism was assessed in human platelets and rat aortic rings. Plasma coagulation was tested in human platelet-poor plasma. Fibrinolysis was measured in human whole blood. RESULTS: The 12 study subjects ranged in age from 20 to 40 years (median age 30 years). At concentrations of 1 x 10(-5) mol/L (approximately 4180 ng/mL), neither risperidone nor 9-OH-risperidone induced platelet shape change or aggregation, amplified reactions to ADP, or modified platelet adhesion/aggregation induced by collagen or ADP, but they did attenuate epinephrine-induced platelet aggregation (-50% in the case of 9-OH-risperidone; P < 0.05) and 5-HT-induced platelet aggregation (drug concentrations yielding 50% inhibition of 5-HT-induced platelet aggregation, 0.5 and 0.2 ng/mL, respectively). Cyclooxygenase, thromboxane A2 synthase, 12-lipoxygenase, prostacyclin synthase, plasma coagulation, and fibrinolysis were unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone reduced epinephrine- and 5-HT-induced human platelet aggregation but did not significantly alter other measures of platelet function, plasma coagulation, or fibrinolysis in vitro.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Outcomes and costs of treatment with risperidone in adult and elderly patients: the Delta patient using risperidone study.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of the present study (called DePUR: Delta patients using risperidone) was to compare patient characteristics, treatment outcome variables and medication costs of adult and elderly patients treated with risperidone. METHODS: In a single-centre retrospective study, the following data were extracted from the medical records of 32 adult (< 65 years) and 32 elderly (> or = 65 years) inpatients to whom risperidone was prescribed shortly after admission: demographic data, diagnosis, medication and hospitalisation history, all drugs taken during admission, treatment effectiveness of risperidone, reported adverse events. These data were collected for the period from admission until discharge or until they had been hospitalised for 120 days. RESULTS: Most patients (81% of adult patients and 91% of elderly patients) received risperidone for a psychiatric disease other than schizophrenia. In elderly patients, major depressive disorder with psychotic features was the most frequent diagnosis. Treatment with risperidone was in most cases effective (72% and 74%, respectively), but effectiveness was established sooner in the adult patients than in the elderly patients (7 versus 14 days). The length of stay in hospital was shorter in adults than in elderly (38.5 versus 92.7 days). The daily dose of risperidone was higher in adults than in elderly patients (3.6 versus 1.7 mg per day). Contrary to expectations, daily drug cost of risperidone and daily drug cost of all inpatient drugs were not cheaper in adult patients than in the elderly, mainly due to a higher dose of risperidone and a higher consumption of antipsychotic co-medication in adults. CONCLUSION: Risperidone is prescribed successfully for many other psychotic features than for schizophrenia. Treatment of elderly patients in our clinic does not require higher daily medication costs than for adult patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Serum concentrations of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone after administration of the long-acting injectable form of risperidone: evidence from a routine therapeutic drug monitoring service.

There is limited documentation on the pharmacokinetics of long-acting intramuscular risperidone in a naturalistic setting. The objective of this study was to investigate the concentrations of risperidone and its active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone as well as the concentration/dose (C/D) ratios achieved after intramuscular depot administration in a routine therapeutic drug monitoring setting. Thirty samples were collected from 10 female and 20 male patients receiving depot injections of risperidone. For 6 of the patients, the results could be compared with corresponding data available after previous oral administration of risperidone. In addition, data from a group of 278 patients using oral risperidone were retrieved. The median serum concentrations of risperidone plus 9-hydroxyrisperidone were 38 nmol/L 12-14 days after a intramuscular dose of 25 mg/14 days, 67 nmol/L after a dose of 37.5 mg/14 days, 99 nmol/L after a dose of 50 mg/14 days, and 148 nmol/L after a dose of 75 mg/14 days. The median C/D ratio for risperidone plus 9-hydroxy-risperidone was 22.2 (nmol/L)/(mg/d). In the group on oral medication, the median C/D ratio was 18.6 (nmol/L)/(mg/d). In the 6 patients previously using oral risperidone, switching to depot injections gave an average increase of 33% (range 12%-68%) in the C/D ratio. In conclusion, the authors' data indicate that there are great interindividual differences in the extent to which the daily dose has to be reduced when switching from oral to intramuscular depot administration to achieve the same serum concentrations of risperidone plus 9-hydroxyrisperidone. Because the degree of dose adjustment required for the individual patient so far cannot be predicted, guidance by therapeutic drug monitoring might be helpful.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Acute and continuation risperidone monotherapy in bipolar mania: a 3-week placebo-controlled trial followed by a 9-week double-blind trial of risperidone and haloperidol.

In a randomized, double-blind trial, patients with acute bipolar mania received 1-6 mg/day of risperidone, 2-12 mg/day of haloperidol, or placebo for 3 weeks, followed by double-blind risperidone or haloperidol for 9 weeks. Of 438 patients, 154 were randomized to risperidone, 144 to haloperidol, and 140 to placebo. The mean+/-S.D. modal doses were 4.2+/-1.7 mg/day of risperidone and 8.0+/-3.6 mg/day of haloperidol during the initial 3-week phase and 4.1+/-1.8 and 7.4+/-3.7 mg/day during the 12-week period. At week 3, mean Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score reductions from baseline were significantly greater in patients receiving risperidone than placebo (p<0.001). Differences between risperidone and haloperidol on this efficacy measure were not significant. Further reductions in YMRS scores were seen in patients receiving risperidone or haloperidol during the subsequent 9 weeks. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Extrapyramidal disorder and hyperkinesias, the most commonly reported adverse events with antipsychotic use, occurred less frequently with risperidone than haloperidol. We conclude that risperidone monotherapy was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for bipolar mania and that efficacy was maintained over the long term.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

A PET study of D2 and 5-HT2 receptor occupancy induced by risperidone in poor metabolizers of debrisoquin and risperidone.

The hydroxylation of the new antipsychotic drug risperidone to its main, active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone is catalyzed by the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP2D6, and cosegregates with the polymorphic hydroxylation of debrisoquin. We have previously examined central D2 dopamine and 5-HT2 receptor occupancy after 1 mg risperidone orally in three healthy subjects who were extensive metabolizers (EM) of debrisoquin, using positron emission tomography and the radioligands [11C]raclopride and [11C]NMSP. In this study, the same experimental design was repeated in two healthy poor metabolizers (PM) of debrisoquin to compare the D2 and 5-HT2 receptor occupancy induced by risperidone in EM and PM. The two PM had much higher plasma concentrations and longer elimination half-lives of risperidone than the three EM. Plasma concentrations of the sum of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone partly overlapped among the EM and PM. D2 receptor occupancy was 50% and 54% in the two PM, as compared to 40%, 43% and 55% in the EM. 5-HT2 receptor occupancy was 63% and 73%, as compared to 45%, 56% and 68% in the EM. These findings support the view that the active 9-hydroxyl metabolite of risperidone contributes to the in vivo effects of risperidone in humans, and thus partly counterbalances the marked variability in the disposition of risperidone.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Effect of verapamil on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of risperidone: in vivo evidence of involvement of P-glycoprotein in risperidone disposition.

OBJECTIVE: A recent in vitro study has shown that risperidone is a substrate of P-glycoprotein. The aim of this study was to confirm the effects of verapamil, a P-glycoprotein inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of risperidone. METHODS: Two 6-day courses of either 240 mg verapamil daily, an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein, or placebo were administered in a randomized crossover fashion with at least a 4-week washout period. Twelve male volunteers took a single oral 1-mg dose of risperidone on day 6 of both courses. Plasma concentrations of risperidone, 9-hydroxyrisperidone, and prolactin were monitored up to 24 hours after dosing. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, verapamil treatment significantly increased the peak plasma concentration of risperidone by 1.8-fold and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 24 hours of risperidone by 2.0-fold but did not alter the elimination half-life. The AUC from 0 to 24 hours of 9-hydroxyrisperidone, but not other pharmacokinetic parameters, was significantly increased during verapamil treatment. However, the AUC from 0 to 4 hours and the AUC from 0 to 8 hours of prolactin concentrations were not increased by verapamil treatment despite the pharmacokinetic alterations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the bioavailability of risperidone was increased by verapamil, suggesting in vivo involvement of P-glycoprotein in the pharmacokinetics of risperidone.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed1998

Risperidone versus clozapine in treatment-resistant chronic schizophrenia: a randomized double-blind study. The Risperidone Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term efficacy and safety of risperidone and clozapine in treatment-resistant chronic schizophrenic patients. METHOD: In a controlled double-blind, multicenter study, 86 inpatients with chronic schizophrenia (DSM-III-R), who were resistant to or intolerant of conventional neuroleptics, were randomly assigned to receive risperidone or clozapine for 8 weeks after a 7-day washout period. After a 1-week dose-titration phase, doses were fixed at 6 mg/day of risperidone and 300 mg/day of clozapine for 1 week and then adjusted according to each patient's response. The final mean doses were 6.4 mg/day of risperidone and 291.2 mg/day of clozapine. Treatment efficacy and safety were evaluated with several well-known rating scales. RESULTS: Both risperidone and clozapine significantly reduced the severity of psychotic symptoms (scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale) from baseline, with no significant between-group differences. At endpoint, 67% of the risperidone group and 65% of the clozapine group were clinically improved (reduction of 20% or more in total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score). Risperidone appeared to have a faster onset of action. In both groups extrapyramidal symptoms and other adverse events were few, and their severity was generally mild. Neither group showed evidence of a relation between drug plasma concentrations and clinical effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone was well tolerated and as effective as medium doses of clozapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia who had been resistant to or intolerant of conventional neuroleptics.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Risperidone in the treatment of patients with chronic schizophrenia: a multi-national, multi-centre, double-blind, parallel-group study versus haloperidol. Risperidone Study Group.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed in order to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of fixed risperidone doses compared to haloperidol. METHOD: In a multi-national, parallel-group, double-blind study, patients with chronic schizophrenia (DSM-III-R) were randomly assigned to risperidone 1, 4, 8, 12 or 16 mg or haloperidol 10 mg daily for 8 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for schizophrenia (PANSS) and clinical global impression (CGI), and safety primarily by the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS). RESULTS: One thousand three hundred and sixty-two patients were evaluated. The optimum risperidone doses were 4 mg and 8 mg, with response rates of 63.4% (56.8%; 69.7%) and 65.8% (59.2%; 71.9%) respectively. Response rate in haloperidol-treated patients was 58.7% (52.0%; 65.3%); the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the differences between risperidone 4 mg or 8 mg and haloperidol were (- 4.3%; 13.7%) and (- 1.9%; 16.0%) respectively. There were no significant differences in CGI scores at endpoint between risperidone 4 mg, 8 mg, 12 mg and 16 mg and haloperidol (3.0, 3.0, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.1 respectively); the 95% CI of the differences between risperidone 4 mg or 8 mg and haloperidol were ( - 0.4; 0.1) and ( - 0.3; 0.2) respectively. Mean shifts to the maximum total ESRS scores versus baseline (mean (confidence interval)) were significantly greater in haloperidol-treated patients (5.1 (4.0; 6.2)) than in the risperidone 1, 4, 8 and 12 mg groups (1.1 (0.3; 1.9); 1.8 (0.9; 2.7); 2.7 (1.8; 3.6) and 3.2 (2.3; 4.1) respectively (P < 0.05)). CONCLUSION: Risperidone is an effective antipsychotic for the treatment of chronic schizophrenia; doses of 4 and 8 mg seem to be optimal and have a lower incidence of side-effects than haloperidol.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of risperidone and placebo for psychosis and behavioral disturbances associated with dementia: a randomized, double-blind trial. Risperidone Study Group.

BACKGROUND: We report the findings from the first large, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of psychotic and behavioral symptoms in institutionalized elderly patients with dementia. METHOD: 625 patients (67.8% women; mean age = 82.7 years) with DSM-IV diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (73%), vascular dementia (15%), or mixed dementia (12%) and significant psychotic and behavioral symptoms were included. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive placebo or 0.5 mg/day, 1 mg/day, or 2 mg/day of risperidone for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease rating scale (BEHAVE-AD). RESULTS: The study was completed by 70% of the patients. Baseline Functional Assessment Staging scores were 6 or 7 in more than 95% of the patients, indicating severe dementia. At endpoint, significantly greater reductions in BEHAVE-AD total scores and psychosis and aggressiveness subscale scores were seen in patients receiving 1 and 2 mg/day of risperidone than in placebo patients (p = .005 and p < .001, respectively). At week 12, 0.5 mg/day of risperidone was superior to placebo in reducing BEHAVE-AD aggression scores (p = .02). More adverse events were reported by patients receiving 2 mg/day of risperidone than 1 mg/day. The most common dose-related adverse events were extrapyramidal symptoms, somnolence, and mild peripheral edema. The frequency of extrapyramidal symptoms in patients receiving 1 mg/day of risperidone was not significantly greater than in placebo patients. CONCLUSION: Risperidone significantly improved symptoms of psychosis and aggressive behavior in patients with severe dementia. Results show that 1 mg/day of risperidone is an appropriate dose for most elderly patients with dementia.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of schizoaffective disorder: initial results from a large, multicenter surveillance study. Group for the Study of Risperidone in Affective Disorders (GSRAD).

BACKGROUND: An adequate therapy for psychotic disorders needs to be effective against mood as well as psychotic symptoms. Analyses of data from clinical trials of risperidone in schizophrenia and small open-label studies in mania suggest that risperidone may have this broad efficacy profile. We present data on a 6-week trial of risperidone for the treatment of schizoaffective disorder that was part of a larger, 6-month surveillance study of patients with affective disorders. METHOD: One hundred two patients suffering from schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV or ICD-10) entered the trial. Inclusion criteria consisted of a current DSM-IV diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; DSM-IV manic or mixed psychotic episode; and a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score > 7 for a mixed episode (> 20 for a manic episode). Assessments included the YMRS, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the 4-item Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale, and the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale subscale for neurologic side effects. For patients entering the study, open-label risperidone therapy was added to their existing regimens of mood-stabilizing treatments. Other antipsychotic drugs were not allowed. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients completed the 6-week trial. At week 6, the mean +/- SD dose of risperidone was 4.7+/-2.5 mg/day. The mean scores on the assessment scales at baseline and week 6 (unless otherwise stated) were as follows: YMRS, 22.7 and 4.7, an improvement of 18.0 points (p < .0001); PANSS (at baseline and week 4), 74.1 and 54.2, an improvement of 19.9 points (p < .0001); HAM-D, 14.0 and 7.4, an improvement of 6.6 points (p < .0001); CGI (at baseline and week 4), 2.6 and 1.7, an improvement of 0.9 points (p < .0001). At week 4, most patients had shown improvement in symptom severity, and 9.3% were completely symptom-free. There were no statistically significant differences between baseline and week 4 in the severity of extrapyramidal symptoms as measured by the UKU. Risperidone was well tolerated; side effects were few and generally mild. CONCLUSION: The results to date with risperidone indicate that it may have both antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing properties. Despite the limitations of the open-label design, the results indicate that risperidone is a safe and effective therapy in combination with mood-stabilizers for the treatment of patients with manic, hypomanic, and depressive symptoms of mixed episodes in schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Comparative efficacy and safety of long-acting risperidone and risperidone oral tablets.

A double-blind study of long-acting injectable risperidone and oral risperidone tablets was conducted in 640 patients with schizophrenia. All patients received flexible doses of 1-6 mg of oral risperidone for 8 weeks. Doses were stable during weeks 5-8. At the end of week 8, symptomatically stable patients were randomly assigned to receive long-acting risperidone (active injections, dummy oral) or continued oral risperidone (dummy injections, active oral) for 12 weeks. Significant improvements were demonstrated from baseline to endpoint in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total (P<0.001) and factor scores (P<0.05) in both groups. According to a noninferiority analysis, the two treatments showed comparable efficacy in total PANSS scores over the short-term. No unexpected adverse events were recorded. The findings indicate that symptomatically stable patients can be safely switched from oral risperidone to long-acting injectable risperidone without compromising efficacy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Risperidone plus lithium versus risperidone plus valproate in acute and continuation treatment of mania.

This exploratory analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone when added to two different mood stabilizers (lithium or valproate) for mania in bipolar disorder. Patients receiving lithium or valproate at baseline were drawn from the database of a 12-week, open-label risperidone study. The primary efficacy measure was the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Other assessments included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of improvement, and safety measures. The analysis included 33 patients on lithium plus risperidone and 46 patients on valproate plus risperidone. Both subgroups had comparable baseline YMRS scores (lithium 28.2, valproate 28.7) and both had significant reductions in score by week 1 (P<0.0001). Comparable reductions in score continued for both subgroups until the end of the study (YMRS scores at week 12: lithium 4.6 and valproate 6.7). There were no significant differences in response rates (> or =50% improvement on YMRS) or remission rates (YMRS score < or = 8) between the two subgroups. At week 12, 88% of the lithium plus risperidone patients and 80% of the valproate plus risperidone patients were in remission. Similarly, HAM-D scores were significantly and comparably reduced in both subgroups, and improvement in CGI was the same. There was no difference between subgroups in the incidence of adverse events or weight gain. These data suggest that risperidone can be safely combined with either lithium or valproate, and that the efficacy is similar regardless of the mood stabilizer used.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

A comparative efficacy and safety study of long-acting risperidone injection and risperidone oral tablets among hospitalized patients: 12-week randomized, single-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: The superiority of risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) over oral typical and atypical antipsychotics demonstrated in previous studies may be related to the improved drug compliance. The aim of the 12-week randomized, single-blind study was to test whether the superiority of RLAI remained among hospitalized patients that drug compliance could be optimally controlled. METHODS: Fifty hospitalized stable schizophrenic patients, who had maintained on oral risperidone for more than 3 months, were randomized to the RLAI and oral risperidone group. Finally 49 patients (98 %) completed the study, and no dose change of oral risperidone, or RLAI was noted among all patients. RESULTS: The RLAI group showed significantly increased positive score of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) than the risperidone group (0.72 +/- 3.52 vs. -1.24 +/- 3.81, p = 0.022), but without significance difference for the PANSS total, negative and general psychopathology scores. The RLAI group also showed a significantly improved Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Scale (p = 0.037), social life domains of Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (p = 0.011), and reduced prolactin level (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results indicated that with optimal controlling of drug compliance among hospitalized patients, RLAI showed no benefit of efficacy over oral risperidone, but with advantages of improved side-effect profiles, social life ratings, and reduced prolactin levels.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Risperidone in the treatment of first-episode psychotic patients: a double-blind multicenter study. Risperidone Working Group.

An international, multicenter, double-blind study was conducted in 183 patients with a first psychotic episode (provisional schizophreniform disorder or schizophrenia; DSM-III-R) treated with flexible doses of risperidone or haloperidol for 6 weeks. At endpoint, 63 percent of risperidone-treated patients and 56 percent of haloperidol-treated patients were clinically improved (> or = 50% reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores). Risperidone was better tolerated than haloperidol: the severity of extrapyramidal symptoms was significantly lower in the risperidone-treated patients; significantly fewer risperidone-treated patients required antiparkinsonian medication; and significantly fewer discontinued treatment because of adverse events. A post hoc analysis revealed that low doses of these antipsychotics were efficacious in some patients. Furthermore, the severity of extrapyramidal symptoms and the use of antiparkinsonian medications were significantly lower in patients receiving low doses (maximum, < or = 6 mg/day) than high doses (maximum, > 6 mg/day) of risperidone or haloperidol. These findings are consistent with the suggestion that patients with a first psychotic episode may require low doses of antipsychotic medications. Studies designed specifically to compare low and high doses of antipsychotics are warranted to help optimize treatment for these patients.

Adolescent↗