Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Retraction Notice”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Retraction of the landmark glyphosate safety publication by Williams, Kroes and Munro (2000) should be reversed.

The decision by the co-Editor-in-Chief of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Prof. Martin van den Berg, to retract the 2000 review article by Williams, Kroes, and Munro has elicited widespread criticism within the scientific community. Issued in late 2025, the retraction decision cites procedural concerns including potential ghostwriting, undisclosed conflicts of interest, and omission of certain unpublished studies, invoking Committee on Publication Ethics guidelines despite lacking evidence of fraud or scientific flaws. This editorial argues that the retraction decision involves editorial overreach and misapplication of the guidelines. The alleged omissions stemmed from proprietary data access limitations that were disclosed in the original paper. Subsequent reviews by several independent expert panels and regulatory authorities with access to all glyphosate data, including the studies cited by the retracting editor, reached similar conclusions. Claims of ghostwriting were previously investigated and found lacking, including a declaration by EFSA as to the clarity of the conflict disclosures. The retraction's timing, reliance on litigation documents, and apparent biases that were not disclosed in the retraction notice raise questions of ideological interference. Absent substantive rebuttals based on scientific merit rather than speculative claims of inappropriate authorship and data access, this retraction decision sets a dangerous precedent for retroactive censorship, potentially chilling beneficial industry-academic collaborations and eroding trust in the integrity of scientific publishing. With the strongest conviction, we assert that retracting a paper without scientific flaws isn't protection-it is censorship. We therefore call for the immediate reversal of this flawed and unjustified retraction to preserve trust in peer-reviewed literature.

COPE↗
PubMed2026

RETRACTION: Loss-of-Function CARS1 Variants in a Patient With Microcephaly, Developmental Delay, and a Brittle Hair Phenotype.

C. Del Greco, M. E. Kuo, D. E. C. Smith, M. I. Mendes, G. S. Salamons, M. Nemcovic, R. Kodrikova, S. Sestak, M. Stancheva, and A. Antonellis, "Loss-of-Function CARS1 Variants in a Patient With Microcephaly, Developmental Delay, and a Brittle Hair Phenotype," Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine 13, no. 2 (2025): e70078, https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.70078. The above article, published online on 18 February 2025 in Wiley Online Library (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the authors; the journal Editor-in-Chief, Paraminder Dhillon; and Wiley Periodicals, LLC. The retraction has been agreed upon due to the lack of appropriate authorization for the publication of the CARS1 variants related to the specific patient described in this clinical report. In addition, written consent for publication was not obtained from the child's legal guardian.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1977

Net activity of phospholipase A2 in brain and the lack of stimulation of the phospholipase A2-acylation stem.

Certain observations reported previously from this laboratory have not proved reproducible. These are (1) the relatively rapid hydrolysis of added phosphatidylcholine by phospholipase A2 of tissue from the cerebral cortex of the guinea pig and (2) the stimulation by 10 micron-noradrenaline and by 1.0nM-cyclic AMP of the phospholipase A2-acylation system of isolated synaptic membranes.

Retraction Notice↗
PubMed1978

[Prognosis of the retinal detachment in children (author's transl)].

Following features seem to characterize retinal detachments in children. High rate of difficult anatomical problems: invisible retinal breaks, macular or paramacular breaks, giant breaks or desinsertions (37% of our cases). High rate of severe traumatic macular lesions. Important delay in treatment with prolonged macular impairment. These facts explain the prognosis. Difficulties in the treatment of retinal breaks explain anatomical results (75% cure rate vs 78,6% for all the retinal detachments treated). In the same way they explain the high rate of multiple operations. Macular impairment and multiple operations explain visual results: 1/3 of the non amblyopic eyes recover a visual acuity comparable to the initial. So, the macular in children does not seem to have a special functional recuperation ability. Two supplementary facts may be mentioned. Delay in treatment has no adverse effect in anatomic prognosis. Non giant "simple" desinsertions expose to a noticeable risk of massive vitreous retraction.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1979

Defective F pili and other characteristics of Flac and Hfr Escherichia coli mutants resistant to bacteriophage R17.

Mutants resistant to the donor-specific bacteriophage R17 were isolated from Hfr and Flac-containing strains of Escherichia coli K-12. Thirty-five mutants were examined for the presence of F pili by electron microscopy. The pilus morphology was studied, as were the abilities of the cells to retract their pili and to synthesize new pili. Measurements were made of the efficiency of the conjugal deoxyribonucleic acid transfer and of M13 and R17 phage infection. All mutants had noticeable defects in pilus production, structure, or function. Mutants were found which produced unusually long pili, displayed wide variations in the number of pili per cell, and were deficient in pilus retraction and synthesis. Evidence is presented that there may be two pathways of pilus retraction.

Coliphages↗