Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Receptors, Lipoprotein”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The NMR solution structure of the relaxin (RXFP1) receptor lipoprotein receptor class A module and identification of key residues in the N-terminal region of the module that mediate receptor activation.

The receptors for the peptide hormones relaxin and insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) are the leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptors LGR7 and LGR8 recently renamed as the relaxin family peptide (RXFP) receptors, RXFP1 and RXFP2, respectively. These receptors differ from other LGRs by the addition of an N-terminal low density lipoprotein receptor class A (LDLa) module and are the only human G-protein-coupled receptors to contain such a domain. Recently it was shown that the LDLa module of the RXFP1 and RXFP2 receptors is essential for ligand-stimulated cAMP signaling. The mechanism by which the LDLa module modulates receptor signaling is unknown; however, it represents a unique paradigm in understanding G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. Here we present the structure of the RXFP1 receptor LDLa module determined by solution NMR spectroscopy. The structure is similar to other LDLa modules but shows small differences in side chain orientations and inter-residue packing. Interchange of the module with the second ligand binding domain of the LDL receptor, LB2, results in a receptor that binds relaxin with full affinity but is unable to signal. Furthermore, we demonstrate via structural studies on mutated LDLa modules and functional studies on mutated full-length receptors that a hydrophobic surface within the N-terminal region of the module is essential for activation of RXFP1 receptor signal in response to relaxin stimulation. This study has highlighted the necessity to understand the structural effects of single amino acid mutations on the LDLa module to fully interpret the effects of these mutations on receptor activity.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed1999

Lipoprotein lipase compensates for the defective function of apo E variants in vitro by interacting with proteoglycans and lipoprotein receptors.

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and apolipoprotein E (apo E) independently enhance binding and uptake of lipoproteins to cells. A coordinate effect of LPL and apo E has been previously described in human hepatozytes where simultaneous addition of both proteins resulted in an additive increase of chylomicron binding and uptake. The role of lipoprotein receptors and proteoglycans in this coordinate effect was now analysed using various cell types and heparinase treatment. To investigate a pathophysiological relevance, the effect of LPL and normal apo E-3 was compared to LPL and four apo E variants, associated with type III hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP). Apo E-3 and LPL increased the binding and uptake of chylomicrons and beta-very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) in an additive way in all cell types analysed, except proteoglycan deficient Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-cells. Heparinase treatment almost completely abolished the effect of apo E and LPL. Addition of LPL to the apo E variants resulted in significant compensation of their defective function in mediating beta-VLDL binding to low density lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor defective fibroblasts. These findings indicate that the coordinate effect of apo E and LPL is mediated by proteoglycans and lipoprotein receptors, independent of the LDL receptor. LPL may compensate for the defective function of apo E variants by enhancing lipoprotein binding to these receptors. Defects in this mechanism may explain how mutations in the LPL molecule contribute to the manifestation of type III HLP in addition to the presence of a defective apo E.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Cellular signalling by lipoprotein receptors.

Lipoprotein receptors are commonly thought merely to mediate the internalization of lipoprotein particles or the exchange of lipids at the cell surface. Recent findings have now implicated these multifunctional receptors in cellular signalling mechanisms that extend beyond simple ligand endocytosis. By mediating the cellular uptake of lipophilic vitamins and hormones, megalin, a member of the LDL receptor gene family, regulates critical hormonal and metabolic processes. Other members of the LDL receptor family interact with cytoplasmic adaptor and scaffold proteins, which allows them to transmit signals directly across the plasma membrane of the target cell. This sheds a new light on the emerging roles of lipoprotein receptors in pathologic disease processes such as Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer Disease↗
PubMed1994

Lipoprotein receptors.

Lipoprotein receptors are membrane proteins which play a central role in lipid metabolism. Although cells are capable of synthetizing de novo cholesterol from acetate, cholesterol is mostly of food origin or synthetized by the liver. The liver is the only organ which can catabolize the cholesterol and clear it from the circulation into biliary acids. Cholesterol, triglycerides and phospholipids are carried in the blood and in the interstitial fluid in association with specific proteins called apolipoproteins (apo), and form the lipoproteins. Although lipoproteins can be separated by their physico-chemical properties (i.e. density), they are the result of continuous exchanges of lipids and apolipoproteins. Lipoproteins are secreted by the intestine and the liver. Enterocytes and hepatocytes associate, in their endoplasmic reticulum, apolipoproteins and lipids from dietary intake and/or endogenous synthesis to form chylomicrons (intestine) or Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL, in the liver). Lipolysis by the lipases of the triglycerides leads to fatty acids which are delivered to cells by a non-receptor pathway. On the contrary, the delivery of cholesterol to cells is dependent of receptors which recognize the lipoproteins by their protein moiety. Peripheric cells use cholesterol from the Low Density Lipoproteins (LDL, final product of VLDL intravascular catabolism) by the LDL receptor pathway. By this receptor, hepatocytes can also perform the clearance of LDL from the organism. The LDL receptor, or B/E receptor, can recognize lipoproteins by both apo B or apo E. However, other receptors might exist to explain the normal catabolism of apo E- containing lipoproteins in patients genetically deficient in LDL receptor. One of the most characterized candidate protein for chylomicrons receptor is the LRP (LDL receptor Related Protein) which shares a strong homology with some domains of the LDL receptor, and which is shown to be the alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor previously described. Due to the delay in clearance by the liver, LDL can undergo oxidation. Oxidized LDL are not recognized by LDL receptor but rather "scavenger" receptors in macrophages and vascular endothelial smooth muscle cells. This metabolism leads to the formation of atherosclerotic plaques. High Density Lipoproteins (HDL) are implicated in the removal of excess cholesterol from peripheral cells and the transport to the liver. Specific HDL binding sites to several mammalian cells have been shown by numerous investigators and one candidate protein has been cloned. Analysis of HDL-induced signal transduction has been a very active field of research.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Transcytosis of lipoprotein lipase across cultured endothelial cells requires both heparan sulfate proteoglycans and the very low density lipoprotein receptor.

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL), the major enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of circulating lipoprotein triglyceride molecules, is synthesized in myocytes and adipocytes but functions while bound to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) on the luminal surface of vascular endothelial cells. This requires transfer of LPL from the abluminal side to the luminal side of endothelial cells. Studies were performed to investigate the mechanisms of LPL transcytosis using cultured monolayers of bovine aortic endothelial cells. We tested whether HSPGs and members of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor superfamily were involved in transfer of LPL from the basolateral to the apical side of cultured endothelial cells. Heparinase/heparinitase treatment of the basolateral cell surface or addition of heparin to the basolateral medium decreased the movement of LPL. This suggested a requirement for HSPGs. To assess the role of receptors, we used either receptor-associated protein, the 39-kDa inhibitor of ligand binding to the LDL receptor-related protein and the very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor, or specific receptor antibodies. Receptor-associated protein reduced (125)I-LPL and LPL activity transfer across the monolayers. When the basolateral surface of the cells was treated with antibodies, only anti-VLDL receptor antibodies inhibited transcytosis. Moreover, overexpression of the VLDL receptor using adenoviral-mediated gene transfer increased LPL transcytosis. Thus, movement of active LPL across endothelial cells involves both HSPGs and VLDL receptor.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Expression of mRNA of lipoprotein receptor related protein 8, low density lipoprotein receptor, and very low density lipoprotein receptor in bovine ovarian cells during follicular development and corpus luteum formation and regression.

Lipoproteins in the plasma are the major source of cholesterol obtained by the ovarian theca and granulosa cells for steroidogenesis. In this study, we have identified mRNA expression in bovine theca and granulosa cells of two lipoprotein receptors, low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLr) and very low density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLr) in granulosa cells from small antral follicles through preovulatory follicles and in theca cells from large and medium sized antral follicles. In the corpus luteum (CL) both these receptors were found in the developing and differentiating stages whereas only mRNA for VLDLr was detected in the regression stage. This study also described for the first time, the presence of lipoprotein receptor related protein (LRP8) in granulosa cells from small antral follicles through preovulatory follicles and in theca cells from large and medium sized antral follicles. This may indicate a role of LRP8 in cholesterol delivery to steriodogenic cells. LRP8 was not detected in any of the CL stages. The roles of the LDLr superfamily in lipid transport to ovarian cells and its participation in follicular and CL development and regression is discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Relative contribution of low-density lipoprotein receptor and lipoprotein lipase gene mutations to angiographically assessed coronary artery disease among French Canadians.

Men with low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations causing familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are at high risk of premature coronary artery disease (CAD). The dyslipidemic state found among patients who are heterozygous for mutations in the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene may also increase the risk of CAD. In the present study, the association of the heterozygous forms of low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations causing FH as well as of LPL gene mutations causing (P207L and G188E) or not causing (D9N and N291S) complete loss of LPL activity with angiographically assessed CAD was estimated in a cohort of 412 French Canadian men aged <60 years who consecutively underwent coronary angiography for the investigation of retrosternal pain. The frequency of FH as well as of LPL gene mutations tended to increase with the number of narrowed coronary arteries. However, CAD occurred earlier in FH patients than in partly LPL-deficient patients. Indeed, the proportion of men affected by FH was of 16.4% in those <45 years of age, and solely 4.3% among those between 56 and 60 years of age (p <0.0001). In contrast, the LPL gene defect was found in only 4.0% of men aged <45 years, whereas this prevalence reached 8.3% among those aged 56 to 60 years. In multivariate analyses, the association of LPL with CAD was not independent of age, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, and other covariates included at baseline, and was not affected by the type of mutation in the LPL gene. In contrast, FH was associated with CAD with minimal contribution of other cardiovascular risk factors. However, the relation between FH and CAD was at least partly dependent on plasma apolipoprotein B concentrations. In the different regression models, fasting insulin and plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were important covariates of CAD, whether or not patients were affected by FH or LPL deficiency. In conclusion, the association of LPL gene mutations with CAD was delayed compared with FH, appeared to be markedly exacerbated by the presence of additional risk factors, and was not affected by the type of mutation in the LPL gene.

Alleles↗
PubMed1996

Human apolipoprotein E receptor 2. A novel lipoprotein receptor of the low density lipoprotein receptor family predominantly expressed in brain.

Isolation and characterization of a human cDNA demonstrated a novel lipoprotein receptor designated apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (apoER2). The new receptor consists of five functional domains resembling the low density lipoprotein (LDL) and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptors. LDL receptor deficient Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing human apoER2 bound apoE rich beta-migrating VLDL with high affinity and internalized. LDL was bound with much lower affinity to these cells. The 4.5- and 8.5-kb mRNAs for the receptor were most highly expressed in human brain and placenta. In rabbit tissues, multiple species of the mRNA with 4, 4.5, 5.5, 8.5, and 11 kb were detected most intensely in brain and testis and, to a much lesser extent, in ovary, but were undetectable in other tissues. In rat adrenal pheochromocytoma PC12 cells, the receptor mRNA was induced by treatment of the cells with nerve growth factor. The receptor transcripts were detectable most intensely in the cerebellar cortex, choroid plexus, ependyma, hippocampus, olfactory bulb and, to a much lesser extent, in the cerebral cortex as revealed by in situ hybridization histochemistry. In the cerebellar cortex, the receptor transcripts were densely deposited in Purkinje cell somata.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Structure of the gene (LRP1) coding for the human alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor lipoprotein receptor-related protein.

The alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor or lipoprotein receptor-related protein (A2MR/LRP) is an amazingly large and multifunctional receptor. The active receptor protein is derived from a 600-kDa precursor, encoded by a 15-kb mRNA, cloned and sequenced in human, mouse, and chicken. We report here the cloning of the entire human gene (LRP1) coding for A2MR/LRP. The gene covered about 92 kb and a total of 89 exons were identified, varying in size from 65 bases (exon 86) to 925 bases (exon 89). The introns varied from 82 bases (intron 53) to about 8 kb (intron 6). In the introns, 3 complete and 4 partial Alu sequences were identified. In intron 44 a complex repetitive sequence posed a cloning problem since it was not retrieved from any genomic library screened. Interexon PCR from exon 43 to 45 yielded a fragment of 2.5 kb. Attempts to subclone this fragment yielded inserts ranging between 0.8 and 1.6 kb. Sequencing of 3 subclones with different-size inserts revealed a complex repetitive element with a different size in each subclone. In the mouse LRP gene this intron was much smaller, and no repetitive sequence was observed. In 18 unrelated individuals no difference in size was observed when analyzed by interexon PCR.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

From cholesterol transport to signal transduction: low density lipoprotein receptor, very low density lipoprotein receptor, and apolipoprotein E receptor-2.

The discovery of an ever growing number of low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene family members has triggered research into many different directions. Here we first summarize the results of classical studies on the role of the LDL receptor in cholesterol transport, the structure/function relationships delineated with the help of LDL receptor mutations in familial hypercholesterolemia, and the elegant way in which cells regulate cholesterol at the transcriptional level. The second part deals with a multifunctional, structurally very close relative, the very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor. While it is involved in lipoprotein transport in certain tissues and species, detailed studies on its function have generated new knowledge about the growing spectrum of ligands and about exciting and unexpected aspects of receptor biology. In particular, these investigations have elucidated the roles of LDL receptor gene family members in ligand-mediated signal transduction. In the third part of this review article, we provide first insight into the roles of the VLDL receptor and of another small relative, the so-called apolipoprotein E receptor-2, in such signaling processes. These findings suggest that to date, only the tip of an iceberg has been uncovered.

Animals↗
PubMed1983

Regulation of hepatic lipoprotein receptors in the dog. Rapid regulation of apolipoprotein B,E receptors, but not of apolipoprotein E receptors, by intestinal lipoproteins and bile acids.

Two distinct lipoprotein receptors can be expressed in the dog liver. One is the apolipoprotein (apo-) B,E receptor. This receptor binds apo-B-containing low density lipoproteins (LDL), as well as apo-E-containing lipoproteins, such as the cholesterol-induced high density lipoproteins (HDL(c)). The second hepatic lipoprotein receptor is the apo-E receptor. It binds apo-E HDL(c) and chylomicron remnants, but not LDL. The present studies were undertaken to determine whether short-term (acute) regulation of the two receptors can occur in response to perturbations in hepatic cholesterol metabolism. The design used three groups of experimental animals: (a) immature dogs (with both hepatic apo-B,E and apo-E receptors expressed), (b) adult dogs (with predominantly the apo-E receptor expressed and little detectable apo-B,E receptor binding activity), and (c) dogs treated with the bile acid sequestrant cholestyramine or those that have undergone biliary diversion (with apo-E receptors and induced apo-B,E receptors). In the first series of experiments, changes in hepatic lipoprotein receptor expression were studied by delivering cholesterol to the liver via intestinal lymph lipoproteins. Dog lymph (5-11 mg of triglycerides/min per kg of body weight, 0.15-0.3 mg of cholesterol/min per kg) or saline were infused intravenously for 6-8 h into matched pairs of dogs. Serial liver biopsies were obtained at intervals of 1-2 h. A progressive loss of specific (calcium-dependent) binding of LDL was seen in hepatic membranes from both immature and cholestyramine-treated dogs. After 4-6 h of lymph infusion, almost no apo-B,E receptor binding could be detected. The decrease in binding of apo-E HDL(c) to the same membranes was much less pronounced, and could be explained by a loss of binding of HDL(c) to the apo-B,E receptor; there was little or no effect on apo-E receptor binding. In the second series of experiments, the effects of a diminished hepatic demand for cholesterol on lipoprotein receptor expression were studied by suppressing bile acid synthesis. The bile acid taurocholate (2-3 mumol/kg per min) was infused intravenously over a 6-h interval. This resulted in a progressive loss of LDL binding to liver membranes of immature or cholestyramine-treated dogs. The infusion of taurocholate for 6 h did not significantly alter the expression of the apo-E receptor binding activity, whereas apo-B,E receptor activity was rapidly down-regulated. Preparation of a bile fistula in adult dogs markedly induced the expression of the apo-B,E receptor. In this state, the binding activity of the apo-B,E receptor could be almost totally abolished by reinfusion of taurocholate for 6 h, without profoundly affecting apo-E receptor binding. Evidence from the analysis of plasma lipoprotein patterns and tissue culture reactivity suggested that changes in assayed hepatic lipoprotein receptor activity occurred in concert with changes in plasma lipoproteins.The results indicate that the two canine hepatic lipoprotein receptors differ in their metabolic regulation. The apo-B,E receptor responds rapidly to changes in hepatic requirements for cholesterol. The apo-E receptor appears to be more refractory to acute regulation. The rapidity of the changes in the activity of the apo-B,E receptor (within 2-4 h) suggests that the binding activity of this receptor may be regulated by factors independent of protein synthesis.

Animals↗
PubMed1981

Genetics of the low density lipoprotein receptor: I. Low density lipoprotein receptor activity in cultured fibroblasts from subjects with or without familial hypercholesterolemia.

Six indices of low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor activity were assayed in cultured fibroblasts from seven subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia (HC) and six subjects without HC (non-HCs). Four non-HCs, three HC heterozygotes and one HC homozygous proband belonged to one kindred (kindred A). The proband's fibroblast 125I-LDL processing values fell within or were slightly above the range defined by fibroblasts from three "receptor-negative" HC homozygotes. Thus, the plasma membrane receptor defect in this kindred is probably of the "receptor-negative" category. LDL receptor-dependent 125I-LDL processing was about twice as high in fibroblasts from non-HCs as in those from HC heterozygotes belonging to kindred A. The segregation pattern of LDL receptor activity in this kindred was compatible with control by a single gene locus. 125I-LDL processing values from non-HCs, HC heterozygotes and HC homozygotes differed significantly from one another, but non-HCs and HC heterozygotes showed some overlap. LDL receptor-dependent 125I-LDL association (plasma membrane binding plus intracellular accumulation) data for 6 HC heterozygous and 13 non-HC fibroblast strains clustered into two and into three groups, respectively. Median 125I-LDL association levels in these groups appeared to be in agreement with hypothesis that two different geno-types in HC heterozygotes and three in non-HCs determined LDL receptor activity. These findings suggest the possibility that 125I-LDL processing studies may reveal "normal" alleles at the LDL receptor locus.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Heterogeneous lipoprotein (a) size isoforms differ by their interaction with the low density lipoprotein receptor and the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor.

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is a complex of low density lipoprotein (LDL) with apolipoprotein (apo) (a). To examine the size distribution of Lp(a), plasma was separated by fast flow gel filtration and Lp(a):B complexes were determined in the eluate by enzyme immunoassays, in which detection was performed with monoclonal antibodies specific for apoB. Lp(a):B particles displayed apparent molecular masses (M(r)) of 2 x 10(6) to at least 10 x 10(6). Lp(a) size isoforms differed by the expression of apoB epitopes and their interaction with cultured human skin fibroblasts. LDL was more effective in inhibiting binding, uptake, and degradation of low M(r) Lp(a) than of high M(r) Lp(a). In contrast, Glu-plasminogen, alpha 2-macroglobulin and tissue-type plasminogen activator were more effective in competing for the cellular degradation of high M(r) Lp(a) than of low M(r) Lp(a). Ligand blotting revealed that Lp(a) bound to the low density lipoprotein receptor, the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor (LRP) and to two other endosomal membrane proteins. We propose that the LDL receptor preferentially internalizes low M(r) Lp(a), whereas LRP may have a role in the clearance of high M(r) Lp(a).

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMed1989

Defects in the low density lipoprotein receptor gene affect lipoprotein (a) levels: multiplicative interaction of two gene loci associated with premature atherosclerosis.

The lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] contains two nonidentical protein species, apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 and a specific high molecular weight glycoprotein, apo(a). Lp(a) represents a continuous quantitative genetic trait, the genetics of which are only poorly understood. Genetic variation at the apo(a) locus affects plasma Lp(a) levels and explains at least 40% of the variability of this trait. Lp(a) levels were found to be elevated 3-fold in the plasma from patients with the heterozygous form of familial hypercholesterolemia who have one mutant low density lipoprotein receptor gene. This elevation was not due to a higher frequency of those apo(a) types that are associated with high Lp(a) levels in familial hypercholesterolemia patients. Rather Lp(a) levels were elevated for each of the apo(a) phenotypes examined. The effects of the apo(a) and low density lipoprotein receptor genes on Lp(a) levels are not additive but multiplicative. This is a situation not commonly considered in quantitative human genetics. We conclude that Lp(a) levels in plasma may be determined by variation at more than one gene locus.

Arteriosclerosis↗
PubMed1981

Regulation of plasma cholesterol by lipoprotein receptors.

The lipoprotein transport system holds the key to understanding the mechanisms by which genes, diet, and hormones interact to regulate the plasma cholesterol level in man. Crucial components of this system are lipoprotein receptors in the liver and extrahepatic tissues that mediate the uptake and degradation of cholesterol-carrying lipoproteins. The number of lipoprotein receptors, and hence the efficiency of disposal of plasma cholesterol, can be increased by cholesterol-lowering drugs. Regulation of lipoprotein receptors can be exploited pharmacologically in the therapy of hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis is man.

Arteriosclerosis↗
PubMed1993

Glycoprotein 330, a member of the low density lipoprotein receptor family, binds lipoprotein lipase in vitro.

Glycoprotein 330 (gp330), a cell-surface protein that is localized in clathrin-coated pits, is structurally related to both the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and the LDLR-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor (LRP). We recently demonstrated that gp330 and LRP may be functionally related as well; both bind the 39-kDa polypeptide referred to as receptor-associated protein (Kounnas, M. Z., Argraves, W. S., and Strickland, D. K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 21162-21166). In this report, we tested several other LRP ligands for their ability to interact with human and rat gp330 in vitro. Gp330 did not exhibit detectable binding to the LRP ligands, alpha 2-macroglobulin protease complex or Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. However, we found that gp330 (purified from human or rat) bound the lipolytic enzyme lipoprotein lipase (LPL) with high affinity (Kd = 6.1 and 2.7 nM, respectively). The binding was saturable, divalent cation dependent, and inhibited by heparin or receptor-associated protein. Because LRP has also been shown to bind LPL, the present findings further extend the functional similarities between gp330 and LRP. By analogy to the postulated role of the LRP-LPL interaction in facilitating hepatic clearance of LPL-associated lipoproteins from the blood (Beisiegel, U., Weber, W., and Bengtsson-Olivercrona, G. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 8342-8346; Chappell, D. A., Fry, G. L., Waknitz, M. A., Iverius, P. H., Williams, S. E., and Strickland, D. K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25764-25767), we speculate that the gp330-LPL interaction described herein may contribute to the uptake of LPL-associated lipoproteins in tissues expressing gp330. Consistent with this possibility, we found that LPL promoted in vitro binding of 125I-lipoproteins to gp330.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1999

Reversal of hyperlipidaemia in apolipoprotein C1 transgenic mice by adenovirus-mediated gene delivery of the low-density-lipoprotein receptor, but not by the very-low-density-lipoprotein receptor.

We have shown previously that human apolipoprotein (apo)C1 transgenic mice exhibit hyperlipidaemia, due primarily to an impaired clearance of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles from the circulation. In the absence of at least the low-density-lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), it was shown that APOC1 overexpression in transgenic mice inhibited the hepatic uptake of VLDL via the LDLR-related protein. In the present study, we have now examined the effect of apoC1 on the binding of lipoproteins to both the VLDL receptor (VLDLR) and the LDLR. The binding specificity of the VLDLR and LDLR for apoC1-enriched lipoprotein particles was examined in vivo through adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of the VLDLR and the LDLR [giving rise to adenovirus-containing (Ad)-VLDLR and Ad-LDLR respectively] in APOC1 transgenic mice, LDLR-deficient (LDLR-/-) mice and wild-type mice. Remarkably, Ad-VLDLR treatment did not reduce hyperlipidaemia in transgenic mice overexpressing human APOC1, irrespective of both the level of transgenic expression and the presence of the LDLR, whereas Ad-VLDLR treatment did reverse hyperlipidaemia in LDLR-/- and wild-type mice. On the other hand, Ad-LDLR treatment strongly decreased plasma lipid levels in these APOC1 transgenic mice. These results suggest that apoC1 inhibits the clearance of lipoprotein particles via the VLDLR, but not via the LDLR. This hypothesis is corroborated by in vitro binding studies. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the VLDLR (CHO-VLDLR) or LDLR (CHO-LDLR) bound less APOC1 transgenic VLDL than wild-type VLDL. Intriguingly, however, enrichment with apoE enhanced dose-dependently the binding of wild-type VLDL to CHO-VLDLR cells (up to 5-fold), whereas apoE did not enhance the binding of APOC1 transgenic VLDL to these cells. In contrast, for binding to CHO-LDLR cells, both wild-type and APOC1 transgenic VLDL were stimulated upon enrichment with apoE. From these studies, we conclude that apoC1 specifically inhibits the apoE-mediated binding of triacylglycerol-rich lipoprotein particles to the VLDLR, whereas apoC1-enriched lipoproteins can still bind to the LDLR. The variability in specificity of these lipoprotein receptors for apoC1-containing lipoprotein particles provides further evidence for a regulatory role of apoC1 in the delivery of lipoprotein constituents to different tissues on which these receptors are located.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMed1997

Synthesis and properties of the very-low-density-lipoprotein receptor and a comparison with the low-density-lipoprotein receptor.

The properties of the very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor have been studied in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with human VLDL-receptor cDNA and compared with those of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor expressed under the same conditions. Immunoblotting showed that the cells produced a mature VLDL receptor protein, of apparent Mr 123000 on non-reduced and 158000 on reduced gels, that was less extensively glycosylated than the LDL receptor. The VLDL receptor was more slowly processed than the LDL receptor, with only approx. 70% of the precursor being converted into the mature protein. Nevertheless, the majority of the receptor in the cells was in the mature form, and most of this was present on the cell surface. The human VLDL receptor bound rabbit very-low-density lipoprotein with beta electrophoretic mobility (betaVLDL), but not human LDL, and uptake through the receptor led to stimulation of oleate incorporation into cholesteryl esters. At 37 degrees C, the characteristics of VLDL-receptor-mediated uptake and degradation of betaVLDL were essentially the same as those mediated by the LDL receptor. However, the VLDL receptor apparently did not show the increase in affinity and decrease in binding of betaVLDL on cooling to 4 degrees C that was exhibited by the LDL receptor. Thus the overexpressed VLDL receptor in CHO cells appears to behave as a lipoprotein receptor with similar, but not identical, properties to the LDL receptor.

Animals↗