Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Rad53”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2024

Loss of Gst1 enhances resistance to MMS by reprogramming the transcription of DNA damage response genes in a Rad53-dependent manner in Candida albicans.

The DNA damage response is a highly conserved protective mechanism that enables cells to cope with various lesions in the genome. Extensive studies across different eukaryotic cells have identified the crucial roles played by components required for response to DNA damage. When compared to the essential signal transducers and repair factors in the DNA damage response circuitry, the negative regulators and underlying mechanisms of this circuitry have been relatively under-examined. In this study, we investigated Gst1, a putative glutathione transferase in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. We found that under stress caused by the DNA damage agent MMS, GST1 expression was significantly upregulated, and this upregulation was further enhanced by the loss of the checkpoint kinases and DNA repair factors. Somewhat counterintuitively, deletion of GST1 conferred increased resistance to MMS, potentially via enhancing the phosphorylation of Rad53. Furthermore, overexpression of RAD53 or deletion of GST1 resulted in upregulated transcription of DNA damage repair genes, including CAS1, RAD7, and RAD30, while repression of RAD7 transcription in the GST1 deletion reversed the strain's heightened resistance to MMS. Finally, Gst1 physically interacted with Rad53, and their interaction weakened in response to MMS-induced stress. Overall, our findings suggest a negative regulatory role for GST1 in DNA damage response in C. albicans, and position Gst1 within the Rad53-mediated signaling pathway. These findings hold significant implications for understanding the mechanisms underlying the DNA damage response in this fungal pathogen and supply new potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

Candida albicans↗
PubMed2025

Rad53 regulates RNase H1, which promotes DNA replication through sites of transcription-replication conflict.

RNA-DNA hybrids and R-loops can lead to extensive DNA damage and loss of genomic integrity if not regulated in a timely manner. Although RNase H1 overexpression is frequently used as a tool to resolve R-loops, the regulation of RNase H1, overexpressed or endogenous, remains poorly characterized. We reveal that in yeast, overexpressed RNase H1 (RNH1) has no effect on gene expression, cell growth, or RNA-DNA hybrid resolution in wild-type cells. Overexpressed RNase H1 does, however, remove RNA-DNA hybrids in mutants where hybrids have become dysregulated. Endogenous RNase H1 becomes up-regulated and chromatin-associated in the absence of Sen1 in a DNA replication checkpoint-dependent manner. Rnh1 gets recruited to genomic loci where RNA-DNA hybrids accumulate following the loss of Sen1. Rnh1, together with Sen1, promotes DNA replication at sites of transcription-replication conflict. Hence, RNase H1, overexpressed or endogenous, responds to unscheduled, stress-inducing RNA-DNA hybrids.

Ribonuclease H↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Two pathways of DNA double-strand break repair in G1 cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

G1 cells of the diploid yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are known to be capable of a slow repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) during holding the cells in a non-nutrient medium (Luchnik et al., 1977; Frankenberg-Schwager et al., 1980). In the present paper, S. cerevisiae cells gamma-irradiated in the G1 phase of the cell cycle are shown to be capable of fast repair of DNA DSB; this process is completed within 30-40 min of holding the cells in water at 28 degrees C. For this reason, the kinetics of DNA DSB repair during holding the cells in a non-nutrient medium are biphasic, i.e., the first, 'fast' phase is completed within 30-40 min, whereas the second, 'slow' phase is completed within 48 h. Mutations rad51, rad52, rad54 and rad55 inhibit the fast repair of DNA DSB, whereas mutations rad50, rad53 and rad57 do not significantly influence this process. It has been shown that the observed fast and slow repair of DNA DSB in the G1 diploid cells of S. cerevisiae are separate pathways of DNA DSB repair in yeast.

Centrifugation, Density Gradient↗
PubMed1990

Genetic control of plasmid DNA double-strand gap repair in yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The repair of double-strand gaps (DSGs) in the plasmid DNA of radiosensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been analyzed. The proportion of repair events that resulted in complete plasmid DNA DSG recovery was close to 100% in Rad+ cells. Mutation rad55 does not influence the efficiency and preciseness of DSG repair. The mutant rad57, which is capable of recombinational DNA DSB repair, resulted in no DSG recovery. Mutation rad53 substantially inhibits the efficiency of DSG repair but does not influence the precision of repair. Plasmid DNA DSG repair is completely blocked by mutations rad50 and rad54.

DNA Repair↗
PubMed1988

Repair of double-strand breaks in plasmid DNA in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

We studied the repair of double-strand breaks (DSB) in plasmid DNA introduced into haploid cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The efficiency of repair was estimated from the frequency of transformation of the cells by an autonomously replicated linearized plasmid. The frequency of "lithium" transformation of Rad+ cells was increased greatly (by 1 order of magnitude and more) compared with that for circular DNA if the plasmid was initially linearized at the XhoI site within the LYS2 gene. This effect is due to recombinational repair of the plasmid DNA. Mutations rad52, rad53, rad54 and rad57 suppress the repair of DSB in plasmid DNA. The kinetics of DSB repair in plasmid DNA are biphasic: the first phase is completed within 1 h and the second within 14-18 h of incubating cells on selective medium.

DNA Repair↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Inducible error-prone repair in yeast. Suppression by heat shock.

The production of reversion mutations in wild-type, diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the alkylating agents N-methyl-N'-nitro- N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and methylnitrosourea (MNU) was suppressed in cells previously treated with a heat shock, or the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide. The same cells previously treated with a heat shock, or the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide. The same treatment after mutagen exposure did not lower the induced mutation frequency. In split-dose experiments, a first MNNG exposure prevented subsequent heat (or cycloheximide) treatment from blocking mutation by a second, later mutagen exposure. These data suggest that, in yeast, MNNG or MNU induces an error-prone DNA-repair system, and that this induction is blocked by protein-synthesis inhibitors. The specificity of this system for different types of DNA damage was investigated using a variety of other mutagenic agents. A prior heat shock did not suppress mutation produced by exposure to ethyl methanesulfonate, ethylnitrosourea, 8-methoxypsoralen + UVA, or gamma-radiation. Partial suppression was observed in cells exposed to methyl methanesulfonate or to 254-nm ultraviolet light. These results indicate that, unlike the SOS system of E. coli, this inducible error-prone process of yeast is responsive to only certain mutagens. Heat shock suppression of mutation produced by MNNG exposure was also demonstrated in wild-type haploid cells, as well as haploid strains mutant in representative genes of the RAD52 epistasis group (rad52, rad53, rad54), the RAD3 epistasis group (rad1, rad2, rad3) and the RAD6 epistasis group (rad9, rad18). The rad6 mutant itself was immutable with MNNG and therefore untestable by these techniques. These data indicate that this error-prone repair system is not absolutely dependent on the integrity of the RAD52 (recombination) or the RAD3 (excision) systems, or on at least some parts of the RAD6 system.

Cycloheximide↗
PubMed1978

Responses of radiation-sensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to lethal effects of bleomycin.

Haploid and diploid strains of yeast containing genes conferring radiation-sensitivity were studied under growing and nongrowing experimental conditions for their relative sensitivities to growth-inhibitory effects of bleomycin (BM). The rad1, rad2, rad3, rad4, rad5 (and allelic rev2), rad7, rad10, rad11, rad 12, rad14, rad15, rad16 and rev3 strains exhibited responses similar to normal (Rad+) yeast strains. It is concluded from these findings that the excision-repair function deficient in several of these mutant strains is not important for repair of bleomycin-induced damages in yeast. The sensitive strains contained rad6, rad9, rad18, rad22, rad50, rad51, rad52, rad53, rad54, rad55, rad56, rad57 and rs1. Strains bearing rad8 or rad19 could not be classified unambiguously. With one exception, all rad mutants found very sensitive to BM were sensitive to X-rays, suggesting that some aspect of the repair of BM- and X-ray-induced damages in yeast may be similar. Sensitivities to BM and radiation co-segregated in pedigrees following meiosis, and several BM-resistant revertants isolated from two rad6 mutant strains sensitive to BM, X-rays and UV were cross-resistant to all three agents. These results confirm that the rad mutants were responsible for the cross-sensitivities in the original strains.

Bleomycin↗
PubMed2014

The N-terminus of Mcm10 is important for interaction with the 9-1-1 clamp and in resistance to DNA damage.

Accurate replication of the genome requires the evolutionarily conserved minichromosome maintenance protein, Mcm10. Although the details of the precise role of Mcm10 in DNA replication are still debated, it interacts with the Mcm2-7 core helicase, the lagging strand polymerase, DNA polymerase-α and the replication clamp, proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Loss of these interactions caused by the depletion of Mcm10 leads to chromosome breakage and cell cycle checkpoint activation. However, whether Mcm10 has an active role in DNA damage prevention is unknown. Here, we present data that establish a novel role of the N-terminus of Mcm10 in resisting DNA damage. We show that Mcm10 interacts with the Mec3 subunit of the 9-1-1 clamp in response to replication stress evoked by UV irradiation or nucleotide shortage. We map the interaction domain with Mec3 within the N-terminal region of Mcm10 and demonstrate that its truncation causes UV light sensitivity. This sensitivity is not further enhanced by a deletion of MEC3, arguing that MCM10 and MEC3 operate in the same pathway. Since Rad53 phosphorylation in response to UV light appears to be normal in N-terminally truncated mcm10 mutants, we propose that Mcm10 may have a role in replication fork restart or DNA repair.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed1989

[Repair of a double-stranded gap in plasmid DNA in radiosensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effectiveness and precision].

The repair of a double strand gap in plasmid DNA in radiosensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been studied. The proportion of repair events resulting in the complete doublestrand gap recovery of the plasmid DNA has been found to be close to 100% in Rad+ cells. The mutation rad55 did not interfere in the doublestrand gap repair efficiency and accuracy. The mutant rad57 is capable of the effective doublestrand gap repair without restoration of the DNA sequence deleted by the gap. The mutation rad53 substantially inhibited the efficiency of the doublestrand gap repair but did not influence the accuracy of the repair. Plasmid DNA doublestranded gap repair is completely blocked by mutations rad50 and rad54.

DNA Damage↗