RNA editing. RNA duplexes guide base conversions.
Recent evidence strengthens the case that editing of mRNAs encoding glutamate receptors subunits occurs by a mechanism in which the RNA editing substrate has a double-stranded conformation.
Animals↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “RNA Editing”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
The evolution of chloroplast RNA editing.
RNA editing alters the nucleotide sequence of an RNA molecule so that it deviates from the sequence of its DNA template. Different RNA-editing systems are found in the major eukaryotic lineages, and these systems are thought to have evolved independently. In this study, we provide a detailed analysis of data on C-to-U editing sites in land plant chloroplasts and propose a model for the evolution of RNA editing in land plants. First, our data suggest that the limited RNA-editing system of seed plants and the much more extensive systems found in hornworts and ferns are of monophyletic origin. Further, although some eukaryotic editing systems appear to have evolved to regulate gene expression, or at least are now involved in gene regulation, there is no evidence that RNA editing plays a role in gene regulation in land plant chloroplasts. Instead, our results suggest that land plant chloroplast C-to-U RNA editing originated as a mechanism to generate variation at the RNA level, which could complement variation at the DNA level. Under this model, many of the original sites, particularly in seed plants, have been subsequently lost due to mutation at the DNA level, and the function of extant sites is merely to conserve certain codons. This is the first comprehensive model for the evolution of the chloroplast RNA-editing system of land plants and may also be applicable to the evolution of RNA editing in plant mitochondria.
Adiantum↗
Plant mitochondrial RNA editing.
RNA editing affects messenger RNAs and transfer RNAs in plant mitochondria by site-specific exchange of cytidine and uridine bases in both seed and nonseed plants. Distribution of the phenomenon among bryophytes has been unclear since RNA editing has been detected in some but not all liverworts and mosses. A more detailed understanding of RNA editing in plants required extended data sets for taxa and sequences investigated. Toward this aim an internal region of the mitochondrial nad5 gene (1104 nt) was analyzed in a large collection of bryophytes and green algae (Charles). The genomic nad5 sequences predict editing in 30 mosses, 2 hornworts, and 7 simple thalloid and leafy liverworts (Jungermanniidae). No editing is, however, required in seven species of the complex thalloid liverworts (Marchantiidae) and the algae. RNA editing among the Jungermanniidae, on the other hand, reaches frequencies of up to 6% of codons being modified. Predictability of RNA editing from the genomic sequences was confirmed by cDNA analysis in the mosses Schistostega pennata and Rhodobryum roseum, the hornworts Anthoceros husnotii and A. punctatus, and the liverworts Metzgeria conjugata and Moerckia flotoviana. All C-to-U nucleotide exchanges predicted to reestablish conserved codons were confirmed. Editing in the hornworts includes the removal of genomic stop codons by frequent reverse U-to-C edits. Expectedly, no RNA editing events were identified by cDNA analysis in the marchantiid liverworts Ricciocarpos natans, Corsinia coriandra, and Lunularia cruciata. The findings are discussed in relation to models on the phylogeny of land plants.
Amino Acid Sequence↗
Changing genetic information through RNA editing.
RNA editing, the post-transcriptional alteration of a gene-encoded sequence, is a widespread phenomenon in eukaryotes. As a consequence of RNA editing, functionally distinct proteins can be produced from a single gene. The molecular mechanisms involved include single or multiple base insertions or deletions as well as base substitutions. In mammals, one type of substitutional RNA editing, characterized by site-specific base-modification, was shown to modulate important physiological processes. The underlying reaction mechanism of substitutional RNA editing involves hydrolytic deamination of cytosine or adenosine bases to uracil or inosine, respectively. Protein factors have been characterized that are able to induce RNA editing in vitro. A supergene family of RNA-dependent deaminases has emerged with the recent addition of adenosine deaminases specific for tRNA. Here we review the developments that have substantially increased our understanding of base-modification RNA editing over the past few years, with an emphasis on mechanistic differences, evolutionary aspects and the first insights into the regulation of editing activity.
Animals↗
Biochemical methods for analysis of kinetoplastid RNA editing.
RNA editing is a posttranscriptional process involving mRNAs [reviewed by K. Stuart et al. (1997) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61, 105-120; G. J. Arts and R. Benne (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1307, 39-54; and S. L. Hajduk and R. S. Sabatini (1996) in Molecular Biology of Parasitic Protozoa (Smith, D. S., and Parsons, M., Eds.), pp. 134-158, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford] and tRNAs [K. M. Lonergan and M. Gray (1993) Science 259, 812-816] that has now been described in an increasing number of eukaryotic organisms. In this process sequences differ from their gene sequences by the addition, removal, or conversion of specific ribonucleotides. RNA editing was first described within the mitochondrion of kinetoplastid protozoa. Several of the mitochondrial mRNAs in these flagellates have uridine residues inserted and deleted at specific sites. In some cases, more than 50% of the mRNA is created by RNA editing. In this article, we describe some of the biochemical methods used in analyzing the process of RNA editing in kinetoplastid mitochondria.
Animals↗
Investigating the mechanism and machinery of RNA editing.
RNA editing in trypanosomes produces mature mRNAs by posttranscriptional guide RNA (gRNA)-directed uridylate insertion and deletion. This article describes methods for the study of RNA editing with an emphasis on an in vitro editing system that was used to explore the general mechanism of editing and that can be adapted for more in-depth studies of this intriguing and important process. Methods used to investigate the macromolecular complex that catalyzes RNA editing are also described. This complex is composed of multiple proteins and contains several catalytic activities. It is in the early stages of characterization. The methods described here are intended to assist in its further analysis.
Animals↗
Recent advances in mammalian RNA editing.
RNA editing is a posttranscriptional modification that results in the generation of nucleotides within an RNA transcript that do not match the bases present within the genome. Mammalian RNA editing events, often represented by cytidine-to-uridine and adenosine-to-inosine conversions, are predominantly mediated by base deamination. In the past decade, important advances have been made in the understanding of editing mechanisms, the identification of RNA sequences and structures necessary for editing regulation, and the cloning and characterization of editing enzymes. It has also recently been appreciated that RNA editing within mammalian substrates can have profound functional consequences in protein function, implicating this posttranscriptional modification as important in the production of molecular diversity.
Adenosine Deaminase↗
Mechanisms and origins of RNA editing.
RNA editing is an essential post-transcriptional process that has been identified in an increasing number of eukaryotic organisms. In the past year, progress has been made in the development of in vitro systems to study the mechanism of RNA editing. Analysis of nucleotide insertion/deletion editing in trypanosome mitochondria has revealed the existence of putative editing intermediates in vivo and in vitro. The development of an in vitro editing system for mammalian apolipoprotein B mRNA has allowed the elucidation of both the sequence requirements and the biochemical mechanism of this form of RNA editing. In addition, recent work has underscored the diversity of RNAs whose structure and function are altered by post-translational editing reactions.
Animals↗
Uridylate addition and RNA ligation contribute to the specificity of kinetoplastid insertion RNA editing.
RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei inserts and deletes uridylates (U's) in mitochondrial pre-mRNAs under the direction of guide RNAs (gRNAs). We report here the development of a novel in vitro precleaved editing assay and its use to study the gRNA specificity of the U addition and RNA ligation steps in insertion RNA editing. The 5' fragment of substrate RNA accumulated with the number of added U's specified by gRNA, and U addition products with more than the specified number of U's were rare. U addition up to the number specified occurred in the absence of ligation, but accumulation of U addition products was slowed. The 5' fragments with the correct number of added U's were preferentially ligated, apparently by adenylylated RNA ligase since exogenously added ATP was not required and since ligation was eliminated by treatment with pyrophosphate. gRNA-specified U addition was apparent in the absence of ligation when the pre-mRNA immediately upstream of the editing site was single stranded and more so when it was base paired with gRNA. These results suggest that both the U addition and RNA ligation steps contributed to the precision of RNA editing.
Animals↗
cis Recognition elements in plant mitochondrion RNA editing.
RNA editing in higher plant mitochondria modifies mRNA sequences by means of C-to-U conversions at highly specific sites. To determine the cis elements involved in recognition of an editing site in plant mitochondria, deletion and site-directed mutation constructs containing the cognate cox II mitochondrial gene were introduced into purified mitochondria by electroporation. The RNA editing status was analyzed for precursor and spliced transcripts from the test construct. We found that only a restricted number of nucleotides in the vicinity of the target C residue were necessary for recognition by the editing machinery and that the nearest neighbor 3' residues were crucial for the editing process. We provide evidence that two functionally distinguishable sequences can be defined: the 16-nucleotide 5' region, which can be replaced with the same region from another editing site, and a 6-nucleotide 3' region specific to the editing site. The latter region may play a role in positioning the actual editing residue.
Apoproteins↗
Identification of RNA editing sites in chloroplast transcripts from the maternal and paternal progenitors of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum): comparative analysis shows the involvement of distinct trans-factors for ndhB editing.
RNA editing alters genomic nucleotide sequences at the transcript level. In higher plant chloroplasts, C-to-U conversion is known to occur at around 30 specific sites. The tobacco cultivar Nicotiana tabacum is an amphidiploid derived from ancestors of N. sylvestris (maternal) and N. tomentosiformis (paternal). The chloroplast genome of N. tabacum is believed to originate from an ancestor of N. sylvestris. To study the evolution of RNA editing in higher plant chloroplasts, editing sites in the two likely progenitors have first been identified based on those found in N. tabacum. Altogether 34, 33, and 32 editing sites have been found in the chloroplast transcripts from N. tabacum, N. sylvestris, and N. tomentosiformis, respectively. Thirty-one sites are conserved among the three species, whereas remarkable differences are observed in the editing of ndhB and ndhD transcripts. Sites 7 and 8 in ndhB mRNAs are separated only by five nt, and both are edited in N. tabacum and N. sylvestris. However, site 8 is not edited in N. tomentosiformis, indicating that distinct trans-factors are involved in the two editing events. The first site in ndhD mRNAs is edited to produce an AUG start codon in N. sylvestris as well as in N. tabacum but not in N. tomentosiformis, suggesting that a distinct mechanism operates for the translational initiation of N. tomentosiformis ndhD mRNAs. Four to six sites are edited partially in green leaves. Some of these sites may represent evolutionary intermediates in the process of losing editing events.
Cell Lineage↗
RNA editing.
RNA editing is a term describing a variety of novel mechanisms for the modification of nucleotide sequences of RNA transcripts in different organisms. These editing events include (a) the U-insertion and -deletion type of editing found in the mitochondrion of kinetoplastid protozoa, (b) the C-insertion editing found in the mitochondrion of Physarum, (c) the C-to-U substitution editing of the mammalian apoB mRNA, (d) a similar C-to-U substitution editing of mRNAs in higher plant mitochondria and chloroplasts and in tRNAs of marsupials and rats, (e) a diverse nucleotide substitution editing of tRNAs in Acanthomoeba mitochondria, and (f) the A-to-I type of editing found in the mammalian glutamate receptor subunits. These diverse phenomena involve several different enzymatic mechanisms. In several cases, duplex RNAs with internal or external guide sequences help determine the site specificity of editing. The A-to-I editing observed in RNAs encoding non-NMDA glutamate receptor subunits may be due to the actions of a double-stranded RNA-specific adenosine deaminase that is widespread in higher organisms. Although the function of many RNA editing events is unclear, the biological importance of RNA editing in other systems may prove as significant as the nucleotide modifications regulating the cation selectivity and electrophysiological profiles elaborated by non-NMDA glutamate receptors in the mammalian brain.
Animals↗
Editor meets silencer: crosstalk between RNA editing and RNA interference.
The most prevalent type of RNA editing is mediated by ADAR (adenosine deaminase acting on RNA) enzymes, which convert adenosines to inosines (a process known as A-->I RNA editing) in double-stranded (ds)RNA substrates. A-->I RNA editing was long thought to affect only selected transcripts by altering the proteins they encode. However, genome-wide screening has revealed numerous editing sites within inverted Alu repeats in introns and untranslated regions. Also, recent evidence indicates that A-->I RNA editing crosstalks with RNA-interference pathways, which, like A-->I RNA editing, involve dsRNAs. A-->I RNA editing therefore seems to have additional functions, including the regulation of retrotransposons and gene silencing, which adds a new urgency to the challenges of fully understanding ADAR functions.
Adenosine↗
Generation of G-to-A and C-to-U changes in HIV-1 transcripts by RNA editing.
RNA editing involves posttranscriptional alterations of messenger RNA (mRNA) sequences modifying the information content encoded by the genetic message. Here, it is shown that, in chronically infected H9 cells, human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) mRNAs undergo guanine-to-adenine (G-to-A) and cytosine-to-uracil (C-to-U) changes. G-to-A modification in the untranslated region of exon 1 was present only in spliced HIV-1 mRNAs. The creation of stop codons in HIV-1 mRNAs may function to control the translation of viral proteins, such as viral protein R, that are involved in the regulation of HIV-1 expression and the survival of chronically infected cells.
Alternative Splicing↗
The amino acid sequence of a plastid protein is developmentally regulated by RNA editing.
RNA editing in plant organelles post-transcriptionally alters single nucleotides by C-to-U or U-to-C conversions at highly specific sites. Plant editing is generally viewed as a repair mechanism acting at the transcript level by restoring conserved amino acid residues. Here we report that an editing reaction within the ndhB transcript (encoding a plastid NAD(P)H dehydrogenase subunit) is strictly dependent on active photosynthesis. Employing non-photosynthetic mutants, we show that in the absence of photosynthesis, the site remains unedited, whereas it is fully edited when the photosynthetic apparatus is intact. Moreover, the site also remains unedited during the etiolated stage of seedling development, suggesting that two different NdhB proteins are synthesized under photosynthetic versus non-photosynthetic conditions. This is the first case where RNA editing in plants appears to regulate gene expression qualitatively, resulting in the production of two different proteins from one and the same gene in a developmental stage-dependent manner.
Base Sequence↗
The role of a metastable RNA secondary structure in hepatitis delta virus genotype III RNA editing.
RNA editing plays a critical role in the life cycle of hepatitis delta virus (HDV). The host editing enzyme ADAR1 recognizes specific RNA secondary structure features around the amber/W site in the HDV antigenome and deaminates the amber/W adenosine. A previous report suggested that a branched secondary structure is necessary for editing in HDV genotype III. This branched structure, which is distinct from the characteristic unbranched rod structure required for HDV replication, was only partially characterized, and knowledge concerning its formation and stability was limited. Here, we examine the secondary structures, conformational dynamics, and amber/W site editing of HDV genotype III RNA using a miniaturized HDV genotype III RNA in vitro. Computational analysis of this RNA using the MPGAfold algorithm indicated that the RNA has a tendency to form both metastable and stable unbranched secondary structures. Moreover, native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis demonstrated that this RNA forms both branched and unbranched rod structures when transcribed in vitro. As predicted, the branched structure is a metastable structure that converts readily to the unbranched rod structure. Only branched RNA was edited at the amber/W site by ADAR1 in vitro. The structural heterogeneity of HDV genotype III RNA is significant because not only are both conformations of the RNA functionally important for viral replication, but the ratio of the two forms could modulate editing by determining the amount of substrate RNA available for modification.
Adenosine Deaminase↗
Model for codon position bias in RNA editing.
RNA editing can be crucial for the expression of genetic information via inserting, deleting, or substituting a few nucleotides at specific positions in an RNA sequence. Within coding regions in an RNA sequence, editing usually occurs with a certain bias in choosing the positions of the editing sites. In the mitochondrial genes of Physarum polycephalum, many more editing events have been observed at the third codon position than at the first and second, while in some plant mitochondria the second codon position dominates. Here we propose an evolutionary model that explains this bias as the basis of selection at the protein level. The model predicts a distribution of the three positions rather close to the experimental observation in Physarum. This suggests that the codon position bias in Physarum is mainly a consequence of selection at the protein level.
Animals↗
Chimeric and truncated RNAs in Trypanosoma brucei suggest transesterifications at non-consecutive sites during RNA editing.
RNA editing adds and removes uridines at specific sites in several mitochondrial transcripts in kinetoplastid parasites probably as specified by guide RNAs (gRNAs) that are complementary to the final edited sequence. Editing has been postulated to involve transesterification which predicts (1) chimeric molecules with a gRNA covalently attached by its non-encoded oligo U tail to an internal editing site in the mRNA and (2) the corresponding truncated 5' portions of the mRNAs. We have characterized cDNAs representing a large number of both types of intermediates from Trypanosoma brucei. The lengths of both U tails and encoded gRNA sequences vary greatly in length. The majority of encoded gRNA sequences are shorter than predicted based on their minicircle coding sequences. Analysis of the predominant sites of gRNA attachment in chimeras suggests that the transesterifications that religate the truncated 5' mRNAs may proceed more rapidly at editing sites at the 5' end of an editing domain and at sites of U deletion. Partially edited sequences in the mRNA portion of chimeras and at the 3' ends of truncated 5' mRNAs also indicate a non-consecutive order of site selection during RNA editing.
Animals↗