Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RADIOTHERAPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (without surgery) compared with radiotherapy alone in localized carcinoma of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal carcinoma can be managed primarily with either a surgical or radiotherapeutic (non surgical) approach. Strategies to improve the outcome of either modality alone include the use of combined modalities. Combination chemotherapy radiotherapy is one approach that has been explored over the years with increasing application in clinical practice especially in North America. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in the outcome of patients with localized esophageal carcinoma. Outcomes of interest include overall survival, cause specific survival, local recurrence, dysphagia relief, quality of life, acute and chronic toxicities. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane strategy for identifying randomized trials was combined with MeSH headings including esophageal neoplasms, radiotherapy, chemotherapy combined modality, drug therapy combination. Medline, Cancerlit and Embase were searched using this strategy. In addition, the Cochrane library was also searched. References from relevant articles and personal files were included. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials in patients with localized esophageal cancer, with one arm employing radiotherapy alone, and one arm employing combination radiotherapy chemotherapy were included. Studies comparing non chemotherapy agents such as pure radiotherapy sensitisers, immunostimulants, planned esophagectomy, were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by two independent reviewers, and the trial quality was assessed using both the Jadad scoring and Detsky checklist. Sensitivity analysis was planned to explore sources of heterogeneity where heterogeneity existed. The factors hypothesized a priori included combination versus sequential treatment, quality of study, biological effective radiotherapy dose (i.e. Radiotherapy dose) cisplatin versus non cisplatin containing trials, and 5FU versus non 5FU containing trials. Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% confidence limits were used to assess the significance of the difference between the treatment arms. Absolute risk difference and number needed to treat (NNT) were used to express the magnitude of difference where appropriate. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen randomized trials were included in the analysis. There were eight concomitant and five sequential radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RTCT) studies. The studies were analyzed separately due to observed heterogeneity across all the studies and biological considerations. Concomitant RTCT provided significant overall reduction in mortality at 1 and 2 years. The mortality in the control arms was 67% and 86% respectively. Combined RTCT provided an absolute reduction of mortality by 9% (95% CI 2-17%) and 8% (95% CI 1-17%) respectively. Expressed as NNT, this is 11 and 10 respectively. At longer follow up, the results were heterogeneous, cautioning against pooling of the data. There was a reduction in the overall local recurrence rate. The local recurrence rate for the control arms was in the order of 69%. Combined RTCT provided an absolute reduction of local recurrence rate of 5% (95% CI 4-26%) with a NNT of 7. There was significant increase of severe and life threatening toxicities with a NNH of 6, with this approach. With the sensitivity analysis, there was a suggestion that cisplatin based and 5FU based chemotherapy studies were reasonable regimens to employ when using this strategy. The results from the sequential RTCT studies were heterogeneous and could not be pooled. Factors hypothesized a priori did not identify any single source that could account for a significant component of the heterogeneity. Examining the results individually, there was no data to support clinical benefit. This approach was also accompanied by significant toxicities. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: When a non-operative approach is selected, then concomitant RTCT is superior to the RT alone. This approach is accompanied by significant toxicities. In patients who are in good general condition, and the risk benefit has been thoroughly discussed with the patient, concomitant RTCT should be considered for the management of esophageal cancer compared with radiotherapy alone.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed1989

Results of a randomized trial comparing BCNU plus radiotherapy, streptozotocin plus radiotherapy, BCNU plus hyperfractionated radiotherapy, and BCNU following misonidazole plus radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment of malignant glioma.

In Brain Tumor Cooperative Group Study 77-02, eleven institutions randomized 603 adult patients with supratentorial malignant glioma to one of four treatment groups following surgery: conventional radiotherapy (6000 cGy in 30-35 fractions) + BCNU, conventional radiotherapy + streptozotocin, hyperfractionated (twice daily) radiotherapy (6600 cGy in 60 fractions) + BCNU, and conventional radiotherapy with misonidazole followed by BCNU. Data were analyzed for the total randomized population and for the 557 patients (86% with glioblastoma multiforme) who met protocol eligibility specifications (including confirmed histopathology on central review). Median survival was approximately 10 months following randomization. Overall there was no statistically significant difference in survival among the four groups. Among non-glioblastoma patients, the misonidazole group appeared to have poor survival. Peripheral neuropathy was a dose-limiting toxicity with misonidazole. It is concluded that neither the addition of misonidazole nor hyperfractionated radiotherapy as given in this protocol offered any advantage over conventional radiotherapy plus either BCNU or streptozotocin for treatment of malignant glioma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups.

PURPOSE: To investigate the potential gain of the concomitant use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in improving local control and reducing the need for colostomy, a randomized phase III trial was performed in patients with locally advanced anal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1987 to 1994, 110 patients were randomized between radiotherapy alone and a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The patients had T3-4NO-3 or T1-2N1-3 anal cancer. Radiotherapy consisted of 45 Gy given in 5 weeks, with a daily dose of 1.8 Gy. After a rest period of 6 weeks, a boost of 20 or 15 Gy was given in case of partial or complete response, respectively. Surgical resection as part of the primary treatment was performed if possible in patients who had not responded 6 weeks after 45 Gy or with residual palpable disease after the completion of treatment. Chemotherapy was given during radiotherapy: 750 mg/m2 daily fluorouracil as a continuous infusion on days 1 to 5 and 29 to 33, and a single dose of mitomycin 15 mg/m2 administered on day 1. RESULTS: The addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy resulted in a significant increase in the complete remission rate from 54% for radiotherapy alone to 80% for radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and from 85% to 96%, respectively, if results are considered after surgical resections. This led to a significant improvement of locoregional control and colostomy-free interval (P = .02 and P = .002, respectively), both in favor of the combined modality treatment. The locoregional control rate improved by 18% at 5 years, while the colostomy-free rate at that time increased by 32% by the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy. No significant difference was found when severe side effects were considered, although anal ulcers were more frequently observed in the combined-treatment arm. The survival rate remained similar in both treatment arms. Skin ulceration, nodal involvement, and sex were the most important prognostic factors for both local control and survival. These remained significant after multivariate analysis. The improvement seen in local control by adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy also remained significant after adjusting for prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. Event-free survival, defined as free of locoregional progression, no colostomy, and no severe side effects or death, showed significant improvement (P = .03) in favor of the combined-treatment modality. The 5-year survival rate was 56% for the whole patient group. CONCLUSION: The concomitant use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy resulted in a significantly improved locoregional control rate and a reduction of the need for colostomy in patients with locally advanced anal cancer without a significant increase in late side effects.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1988

[Results of radiotherapy in advanced oropharyngeal carcinomas. Primary and postoperative radiotherapy versus radiotherapy following polychemotherapy].

Within the period from 1971 through 1984, 185 patients with advanced oropharynx carcinomas were irradiated during primary therapy. The influence of a standardized chemotherapy (Heidelberg scheme) as initial therapeutic measure is investigated. Whereas 10% of the patients were treated in this way from 1971 through 1977, this part was 78% from 1978 through 1984. The remission rate after chemotherapy was 62%; the greater part of these remissions were partial remissions. The influence of chemotherapy was seen in increased radical macroscopic tumor resections, but also in an increased frequency of radiotherapy interruptions in case of severe mucous reactions. An increased rate of complete tumor remissions after irradiation was not observed. Nonresponders to chemotherapy showed a significantly poorer response to subsequent radiotherapy. There were no differences in survival times between the two periods in spite of the considerably modified therapy methods.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2001

Radical radiotherapy for stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer in patients not sufficiently fit for or declining surgery (medically inoperable).

BACKGROUND: In general, surgery is believed to offer the best prospects for cure for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In spite of the intention to consider all patients with stage I-II disease for surgery, there are those who, although technically operable, either refuse surgery or are considered inoperable because of insufficient respiratory reserve, cardiovascular disease or general frailty. This group may therefore be considered "medically inoperable". Some respiratory physicians refer these patients for radical radiotherapy whilst others believe that radiotherapy has little to offer and adopt a watch policy, referring patients for palliative radiotherapy only when they become symptomatic. Although there is little evidence from randomised trials to support the use of radical radiotherapy for stage I/II NSCLC, it is the perception of most clinical oncologists (radiotherapists) that patients should receive radical, as opposed to palliative, treatment (COIN 1999). OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and the morbidity of radical radiotherapy for medically inoperable NSCLC. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised trials were sought by electronic searching the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register and both randomised and non-randomised trials sought by searching Medline and Excerpta Medica (Embase). Further studies were identified from references cited in those papers already identified by electronic searching. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies of patients of any age with stage I/II NSCLC receiving radiotherapy at a dose greater than 40Gy in 20 fractions over four weeks or its radiobiological equivalent. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two randomised and thirty-five non-randomised studies were identified. One randomised and nine non-randomised studies did not meet the selection criteria and were not included in the review. MAIN RESULTS: In the randomised trial comparing two radiotherapy schedules, two-year survival was superior following continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART; 37%) compared to 60Gy in 30 fractions over six weeks (24%). There were 26 non-randomised retrospective studies including an estimated 2003 patients, in which overall survival results varied between 33-72% at two years, 17-55% at three years and 0-42% at five years. The proportion of deaths not due to cancer was 11-43%. Cancer-specific survival was between 54-93% at two years, 22-56% at three years and 13-39% at five years. Complete response rates were 33-61% and local failure rates between 6-70%. Distant metastases developed in approximately 25% of patients. Better response rates and survival were seen in those with smaller tumours and in those receiving higher doses though the reasons for prescribing higher doses were not clearly stated. Worse outcome was seen in those with prior weight loss or poor performance status. Assessment of treatment-related morbidity and effects on quality of life and symptom control were inconclusive because of the lack of prospective evaluation and paucity of data. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There were no randomised trials that compared a policy of immediate radical radiotherapy with palliative radiotherapy given when patients develop symptoms. In the absence of such trials, radical radiotherapy appears to result in a better survival than might be expected had treatment not been given. A substantial, though variable, proportion of patients died during follow-up from causes other than cancer. The optimal radiation dose and treatment technique (particularly with respect to mediastinal irradiation) remain uncertain.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed2001

Surgery versus radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: Muscle invasive bladder cancer is a serious clinical problem and is fatal for the majority of patients. Alternative treatments for this condition are radical cystectomy or radical radiotherapy. The choice of treatment varies according to the resident country. The ideal treatment would be a bladder preserving therapy with total eradication of the tumour without compromising survival. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to compare the survival after radical surgery (cystectomy) versus radical radiotherapy in patients with muscle invasive cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (July 2000), Medline (July 2000), EMBASE (July 2000), Cancerlit (July 2000), Healthstar (July 2000) and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (July 2000). Attempts to contact authors of unpublished data were undertaken. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing surgery versus radiotherapy were eligible for assessment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers assessed trial quality based on the Cochrane Guidelines. Data was extracted from the text of the article or extrapolated from the Kaplan-Meier plot. The Peto odds ratio was determined to compare the overall-survival and disease-specific survival. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis and treatment actually received. MAIN RESULTS: Three randomised trials comparing pre-operative radiotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (surgery) versus radical radiotherapy with salvage cystectomy (radical radiotherapy) were eligible for assessment. These trials represented a total of 439 patients, 221 randomised to surgery and 218 to radical radiotherapy. Peto odds ratio analysis consistently favoured surgery in terms of survival. It was significant at 3 (OR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.10,4.07) and 5 years (OR = 2.40, 95% CI 1.35, 4.29) for overall survival and at 3 years (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.06,3.65) for disease-specific survival for patients that actually received the protocol treatment. On an intention-to-treat analysis for disease-specific survival, the results were significantly in favour of surgery at 3 years (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.06,3.65) but not at 5 years. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from this review suggests that there is no overall statistically significant benefit to radiotherapy or surgery ( with pre-operative radiotherapy) in muscle invasive bladder cancer in terms of survival, but the trends consistently favour surgery.

Confidence Intervals↗
PubMed2000

Preoperative radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma. Oeosphageal Cancer Collaborative Group.

BACKGROUND: The existing randomized evidence has failed to conclusively demonstrate the benefit or otherwise of preoperative radiotherapy in treating patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether there is benefit from adding radiotherapy prior to surgery and whether or not any pre-defined patient subgroups benefit more or less from preoperative radiotherapy SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline and CancerLit searches were supplemented by information from trial registers and by hand searching relevant meeting proceedings and by discussion with relevant trialists, organisations and industry. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis provided they randomized patients with potentially resectable carcinoma of the esophagus (of any histological type) to receive radiotherapy or no radiotherapy prior to surgery. Trials must have used a randomization method which precluded prior knowledge of treatment assignment and completed accrual by December 1993, to ensure sufficient follow-up by the time of the first analysis (September 1995). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A quantitative meta-analysis using updated data from individual patients from all properly randomized trials (published or unpublished) comprising 1147 patients (971 deaths) from five randomized trials. This approach was used to assess whether preoperative radiotherapy improves overall survival and whether it is differentially effective in patients defined by age, sex and tumour location. MAIN RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 9 years, in a group patients with mostly squamous carcinomas, the hazard ratio (HR) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.78-1.01) suggests an overall reduction in the risk of death of 11% and an absolute survival benefit of 3% at 2 years and 4% at 5 years. This result is not conventionally statistically significant (p=0.062). No clear differences in the size of the effect by sex, age or tumor location were apparent. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Based on existing trials, there was no clear evidence that preoperative radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. These results indicate that if such preoperative radiotherapy regimens do improve survival, then the effect is likely to be modest with an absolute improvement in survival of around 3 to 4%. Trials or a meta-analysis of around 2000 patients (90% power, 5% significance level) would be needed to reliably detect such an improvement (from 15 to 20%).

Esophageal Neoplasms↗
PubMed1985

Erythropoietic recovery in human after extended field radiotherapy. Ferrokinetic studies of patients treated by radiotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation and of patients treated by moderate doses (20 Gy) of radiotherapy.

The ability of human irradiated bone marrow to provide suitable environment for migrating stem cells has been studied in four patients. These had received chemotherapy plus doses of 40 Gy to thoracic vertebrae and sternum, followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation. The erythropoietic activity in the non-irradiated areas was increased but it was low in irradiated areas at 3.5 weeks and undetectable at 6 months after autotransplantation. This shows that no nidation of migrating stem cells actively contributed to bone marrow regeneration after 40 Gy and suggests the existence of environmental lesions. No extramedullary erythropoiesis and no bone marrow extension were found in these patients. Four patients who had received doses of 20 Gy to extended bone marrow volume were submitted to ferrokinetic studies from one to 18 years after radiotherapy. In non-irradiated areas the erythropoietic activity was within the normal range. In irradiated areas, it was significantly lower than in the non-irradiated areas and was intermediate between the erythropoietic activity in the sacrum of six healthy control subjects and in the irradiated areas of the four autografted patients. Bone marrow extension was found in these patients. This study suggests that bone marrow recovery after irradiation might not be an all-or-none phenomenon. It would be of interest to better document the dose-effect relationship.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Long-term results of combined chemotherapy-radiotherapy approach in Hodgkin's disease: superiority of ABVD plus radiotherapy versus MOPP plus radiotherapy.

In an attempt to reduce some of the delayed sequelae associated with combined modality therapy in Hodgkin's disease, we randomly tested stages IIB, IIIA, and IIIB MOPP (mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) v ABVD (Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine). In 232 previously untreated patients, three cycles of either combination preceded and followed extensive irradiation. The complete remission rate was 80.7% following MOPP and 92.4% following ABVD (P less than .02). The 7-year results indicated that ABVD was superior to MOPP in terms of freedom from progression (80.8% v 62.8%; P less than .002), relapse-free survival (87.7% v 77.2%; P = .06), and overall survival (77.4% v 67.9%; P = .03). Moreover, the comparative iatrogenic morbidity showed that irreversible gonadal dysfunction as well as acute leukemia occurred only in patients subjected to MOPP, while cardiopulmonary studies failed to document significant laboratory differences between the two treatment groups. Present findings indicate that ABVD followed by extensive irradiation represents a valid therapeutic alternative to the widely used alkylating agent-containing regimens plus radiotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of radiotherapy alone with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia in locally advanced pelvic tumours: a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial. Dutch Deep Hyperthermia Group.

BACKGROUND: Local-control rates after radiotherapy for locally advanced tumours of the bladder, cervix, and rectum are disappointing. We investigated the effect of adding hyperthermia to standard radiotherapy. METHODS: The study was a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial. 358 patients were enrolled from 1990 to 1996, in cancer centres in the Netherlands, who had bladder cancer stages T2, T3, or T4, NO, MO, cervical cancer stages IIB, IIIB, or IV, or rectal cancer stage M0-1 were assessed. Patients were randomly assigned radiotherapy (median total dose 65 Gy) alone (n=176) or radiotherapy plus hyperthermia (n=182). Our primary endpoints were complete response and duration of local control. We did the analysis by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Complete-response rates were 39% after radiotherapy and 55% after radiotherapy plus hyperthermia (p<0.001). The duration of local control was significantly longer with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia than with radiotherapy alone (p=0.04). Treatment effect did not differ significantly by tumour site, but the addition of hyperthermia seemed to be most important for cervical cancer, for which the complete-response rate with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia was 83% compared with 57% after radiotherapy alone (p=0.003). 3-year overall survival was 27% in the radiotherapy group and 51% in the radiotherapy plus hyperthermia group. For bladder cancer, an initial difference in local control disappeared during follow-up. INTERPRETATION: Hyperthermia in addition to standard radiotherapy may be especially useful in locally advanced cervical tumours. Studies of larger numbers of patients are needed for other pelvic tumour sites before practical recommendations can be made.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

The role of radiotherapy in the management of extrahepatic bile duct cancer: an analysis of 145 consecutive patients treated with intraluminal and/or external beam radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of high dose radiotherapy and to evaluate its role in the management of extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1983 and 1991, 145 consecutive patients with EHBD cancer were treated by low dose rate intraluminal 192Ir irradiation (ILRT) either alone or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Among the primarily irradiated, 77 patients unsuitable for surgical resection, 54 were enrolled in radical radiotherapy, and 23 received palliative radiotherapy. Fifty-nine received postoperative radiotherapy, and the remaining 9 preoperative radiotherapy. The mean radiation dose was 67.8 Gy, ranging from 10 to 135 Gy. Intraluminal 192Ir irradiation was indicated in 103 patients, and 85 of them were combined with EBRT. Expandable metallic biliary endoprosthesis (EMBE) was used in 32 primarily irradiated patients (31 radical and 1 palliative radiotherapy) after the completion of radiotherapy. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates for all 145 patients were 55%, 18%, and 10%, for the 54 patients treated by radical radiotherapy (mean 83.1 Gy), 56%, 13%, and 6% [median survival time (MST) 12.4 months], and for the 59 patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy (mean 61.6 Gy), 73%, 31%, and 18% (MST 21.5 months), respectively. Expandable metallic biliary endoprosthesis was useful for the early establishment of an internal bile passage in radically irradiated patients and MST of 14.9 months in these 31 patients was significantly longer than that of 9.3 months in the remaining 23 patients without EMBE placement (p < 0.05). Eighteen patients whose surgical margins were positive in the hepatic side bile duct(s) showed significantly better survival compared with 15 patients whose surgical margins were positive in the adjacent structure(s) (44% vs. 0% survival at 3 years, p < 0.001). No survival benefit was obtained in patients given palliative or preoperative radiotherapy. Gastroduodenal complications increased in those receiving doses of 90 Gy or more, and serious biliary bleeding was experienced in three preoperatively irradiated patients. Complications in other patients was tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose radiotherapy, consisting of ILRT and EBRT, appears to be feasible in the management of EHBD cancer, and it offers a survival advantage for patients not suited for surgical resection and patients with positive margins in the resected end of the hepatic side bile duct. Expandable metallic biliary endoprosthesis assists the internal bile flow and may lengthen survival after high dose radiotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

A randomized trial comparing platinum-based chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Seventy-one patients with stage IIb-IVa cervical cancer were entered on a randomized trial comparing standard pelvic radiotherapy vs. 3 cycles of combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine and bleomycin followed by pelvic radiotherapy. Four out of 34 patients randomized to PVB followed by radiotherapy received no PVB and a further 3 patients had only one or 2 cycles of chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy due to drug-related toxicity or progressive disease. After a median follow-up of 3.1 years, no significant difference in survival has emerged between the two randomized groups. However, a difference in the pattern of relapse is emerging with a relatively reduced frequency of systemic relapse in patients receiving chemotherapy prior to local radiotherapy compared to radiotherapy alone. Tumor response was seen following PVB treatment and prior to radiotherapy in 47% of patients. Overall the tumor response rate following completion of radiotherapy was 89% in those treated by radiotherapy and 94% after PVB+radiotherapy. Thirty-three percent of patients randomized to radiotherapy alone relapsed first at a distant (extra pelvic site), and only 18% of patients randomized to initial PVB followed by radiotherapy relapsed systemically initially. When results are presented according to treatment actually given, these trends in patterns of treatment failure are magnified. No treatment-related deaths were reported, and there was no excess of complications with pelvic radiotherapy in the group who had received prior PVB chemotherapy.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Five-year update of a randomized trial of alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in treatment of unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: In 1992, we reported the first analysis of a randomized trial comparing alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The results of that 3-year analysis indicated that the combined treatment had superior efficacy. PURPOSE: After an additional 2 years of follow-up, we again compared the efficacy of the two treatment regimens, with attention paid to differences in overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival. METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven patients with untreated, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to receive either chemotherapy (four courses of cisplatin [20 mg/m2] and fluorouracil [200 mg/m2], given daily for 5 consecutive days during weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10) plus radiotherapy (three courses of 20 Gy each, given in fractions of 2 Gy per day during weeks 2-3, 5-6, and 8-9) or radiotherapy alone (70 Gy total dose, given in fractions of 2 Gy per day, 5 days per week). Eighty patients received the combined therapy, and 77 were treated with radiotherapy alone. Responses, failures, and toxic effects associated with the two treatment regimens were compared. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method; the logrank test was used to compare survival parameters between the two patient groups. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: As reported previously, toxic effects associated with the combined therapy included both chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-related effects; however, the incidence and severity of mucositis were nearly identical among patients in the two treatment arms. The combined treatment was associated with a statistically significant increase in the frequency of complete response (i.e., the disappearance of clinically detectable disease for at least 4 weeks) (43% for the combined-treatment group compared with 22% for the radiotherapy-only group; P = .037, chi-squared test). Five-year estimates of overall survival in the combined-treatment group compared with the radiotherapy-only group were 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14%-40%) and 10% (95% CI = 4%-24%), respectively (P = .01, logrank test). The estimates of progression-free survival at 5 years in the combined-treatment group compared with the radiotherapy-only group were 21% (95% CI = 11%-37%) and 9% (95% CI = 3%-22%), respectively (P = .008, logrank test). Finally, the 5-year estimates of locoregional relapse-free survival were 64% (95% CI = 36%-84%) in the combined-treatment group and 32% (95% CI = 10%-65%) in the radiotherapy-only group (P = .038, logrank test). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The superiority of alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy over radiotherapy alone in treating unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck seen at 3 years was confirmed at 5 years. However, additional trials must be conducted before considering the combined approach as standard therapy.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1992

Endometrial carcinoma in patients aged 75 years or older: outcome and complications after postoperative radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone.

A retrospective analysis is reported of 89 patients at least 75 years old (median age 79 years) treated with irradiation for endometrial carcinoma between 1972 and 1989, the median follow-up being 39 months. In 66 patients radiotherapy was given postoperatively and in one case preoperatively, 22 patients were treated with radiotherapy alone: intravaginal insertions exclusively in 22 patients (median dose 60 Gy to the mucosa) and combined with external radiotherapy in 53 patients (median external target dose 45 Gy; three or four fields, all treated daily, 1.8 to 2.0 Gy per fraction, five fractions per week; 30 Gy to the vaginal mucosa with low-dose rate). A few patients were treated with external radiotherapy or intrauterine insertions only. 65% of the patients treated with radiotherapy alone and 34% of the patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy had FIGO stage II or III disease. Five-year actuarial overall survival and disease-free survival for all patients with adenocarcinomas treated with curative intent was 47.5% and 57.2%, respectively. In 48 patients with surgical stages I and II, treated with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy, overall actuarial survival is 58.2% and disease-free survived 65.5% at five years. After postoperative vaginal insertions only, no vaginal recurrence occurred. With combined external and intravaginal radiotherapy in surgical stage I and II, 4/36 patients (11%) showed a recurrence in the vagina only, the abdominal and pelvic recurrence rate being 8.3%. Grade 3 to 4 late toxicity was observed in 6/53 patients (11.3%) treated with external and intravaginal radiotherapy. However, in patients receiving external radiotherapy less than 45 Gy and intravaginal radiotherapy 30 to 40 Gy, as is standard postoperative adjuvant treatment today, only one grade 3 late toxicity was observed in 17 patients (5.9%). We conclude, that treatment of elderly patients with adenocarcinoma of the uterus should follow the same pattern as in younger patients, the acute side-effects and late toxicity of radiotherapy being similar.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1993

Pituitary adenomas: long-term results for radiotherapy alone and post-operative radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Analysis of prognostic factors and long-term results of treatment of pituitary adenomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study involved a retrospective review of outcome in a series of 268 patients with pituitary adenomas, treated at the Queensland Radium Institute from January 1962 to December 1986. The study population included 108 patients treated with radiotherapy alone and 160 patients treated by surgery and post-operative radiotherapy. In each group, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted of possible prognostic factors including age, sex, performance status, tumor type, tumor extent, visual disturbance, radiotherapy dose, and field size. RESULTS: For radiotherapy alone, the 10-year progression-free survival rate was 60%, and overall tumor control was obtained in 77%. Univariate analysis suggested that tumor type and radiotherapy field size were of prognostic significance. Multivariate analysis confirmed that Prolactinoma subtype and increasing radiotherapy field size were independently predictive of reduced progression-free survival. Long-term visual complications occurred in 1% of patients treated by radiotherapy alone. In patients treated by surgery and post-operative radiotherapy, the 10-year progression-free survival rate was 77%, and overall tumor control was achieved in 83%. Univariate analysis suggested that tumor type, completeness of surgical excision, and radiotherapy dose were predictive of outcome. However, on multivariate analysis, only the extent of surgical excision predicted prognosis independently. Long-term visual sequelae were noted in 3% of patients treated by surgery and post-operative radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Both radiotherapy alone and post-operative radiotherapy are effective in long-term control of pituitary adenomas, and produce acceptably low complication rates.

Adenoma↗
PubMed1993

[Radiotherapy in adults with localized supradiaphragmatic stages CS I/II of Hodgkin's disease. 2. The special aspects of radiotherapy: dosage, fractionation, focal volumes, risks, conclusions].

For patients with Morbus Hodgkin and CS I/II of the low risk group and primary radiotherapy recommended treatment fields are: regional field for isolated high cervical involvement, mantle field for isolated mediastinal involvement and extended mantle field for the other patients. Omission of the infradiaphragmatic irradiation volume for PS I/II may be regarded as an advantage, which must be compared with the risk of a staging laparotomy, whereas the low risk of undertreatment of a small part of patients with CS I/II PS III probably does not outweigh the risk of the laparotomy. Equal efficacy of chemotherapy alone for these patients has not been proven sufficiently and important questions concerning long-term risks are unanswered. Ongoing studies will show, whether combinations with reduced chemotherapy or other types of chemotherapy and local radiotherapy are superior. Details of the mantle field borders and blocking are described. In most patients with adjuvant radiotherapy after complete remission after chemotherapy, the recommended target volume includes only the regions with proven involvement before chemotherapy. Details of the mediastinal treatment volume for patients with adjuvant radiotherapy after chemotherapy for bulky mediastinal disease are given. According to some recent analysis of a large body of dose-effect data, the recommended target doses in primary irradiation are between 36 and 40 Gy for regions with proven involvement and between 30 and 36 Gy for electively treated regions. The recommended target dose per fraction is between 1.5 and 1.8 Gy and less than 2 Gy in various critical tissues. According to the recent recommendations, the maximal total doses in mantle field radiotherapy to the spinal cord should be 38 Gy for radiotherapy alone and 36 Gy for radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy. The maximal total dose to the whole heart should be 15 Gy and for the other parts between 30 and 35 Gy. After chemotherapy with MOPP oder MOPP-like regimes, there is a cumulative risk of leukaemia between 2.2 and 11.9%. After radiotherapy alone, there is only a very low risk of leukaemia after radiotherapy and chemotherapy to the risk after chemotherapy. Most long-term studies show an increased risk of solid second malignancies associated with radiotherapy with a relative risk of approximately two. In the analyzed studies, the cumulative risk of solid second malignancy after seven to 15 years is between 7 and 11.2% after radiotherapy, between 7 and 11.7% after chemotherapy and between 7 and 11.7% after radiotherapy and chemotherapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Morbidity and mortality of ischaemic heart disease in high-risk breast-cancer patients after adjuvant postmastectomy systemic treatment with or without radiotherapy: analysis of DBCG 82b and 82c randomised trials. Radiotherapy Committee of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy in addition to systemic treatment after mastectomy prolongs survival in high-risk breast-cancer patients. However, adjuvant radiotherapy has a potential association with ischaemic heart disease. We assessed morbidity and mortality from ischaemic heart disease in patients treated with postmastectomy radiotherapy. METHODS: Between 1982 and 1990, we randomly assigned 3083 women at high risk of breast cancer, after mastectomy, adjuvant systemic treatment with (n=1538) or without (n=1545) radiotherapy. An anterior photon field was used against the periclavicular region and the axilla. The chest wall was treated through two anterior shaped electron fields, one including the internal mammary nodes. The intended dose was 48-50 Gy in 22-25 fractions, at four to five fractions per week. We obtained information on morbidity and mortality of ischaemic heart disease over a median of 10 years. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: More women in the no-radiotherapy group than in the radiotherapy group died of breast cancer (799 [52.5%] vs 674 [44.2%]), whereas similar proportions of each group died from ischaemic heart disease (13 [0.9%] vs 12 [0.8%]). The relative hazard of morbidity from ischaemic heart disease among patients in the radiotherapy compared with the no-radiotherapy group was 0.86 (95% CI 0.6-1.3), and that for death from ischaemic heart disease was 0.84 (0.4-1.8). The hazard rate of morbidity from ischaemic heart disease in the radiotherapy group compared with the no-radiotherapy group did not increase with time from treatment. INTERPRETATION: Postmastectomy radiotherapy with this regimen does not increase the actuarial risk of ischaemic heart disease after 12 years.

Adult↗