SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Psoriatic arthritis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Definition and prevalence of residual disease in inflammatory arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess how residual disease (i.e., clinically relevant signs/symptoms despite achieving treatment targets) is defined in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and estimate the prevalence/severity of residual disease in these diseases. METHODS: Systematic review of original research in RA/PsA/axSpA. Two key residual disease components were extracted: (1) the patient's disease state (often remission/low disease activity) and (2) which residual signs/symptoms were measured, e.g. swollen joints or fatigue (indicators of residual disease). Frequencies of the disease states and indicators were described (Objective 1). Prevalence (%) and severity (absolute score on instrument, e.g. fatigue NRS) of residual disease was analysed by indicator, using random effects meta-analysis (≥4 studies) or descriptively (<4 studies) (Objective 2). RESULTS: Regarding residual disease definitions (59 studies), disease states were almost exclusively disease activity-based (>99%), but with much variation in specific instruments/thresholds. Across diseases, physician-reported (66%) and patient-reported (73%) indicators were used more often than laboratory indicators to define residual disease (46%). Especially peripheral joint counts, pain, physical function and CRP were frequently used (42-56% of studies). The prevalence of residual disease (84 studies) was notable. For example, 5-25% of RA and PsA patients in remission still had swollen joints, and up to one-third reported relevant pain or fatigue. For axSpA, evidence was limited. CONCLUSION: Residual disease definitions in RA/PsA/axSpA are based on various disease activity instruments/thresholds and indicators (signs/symptoms). Residual disease affects up to half of patients. Future research should aim for a consensus-based definition of residual disease.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Co-occurrence of rheumatoid arthritis and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease: A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease are forms of inflammatory arthritis which may have similar presentations. There is growing recognition that these conditions can coexist, especially in elderly patients. This systematic literature review aims to examine the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of patients with both RA and CPPD disease. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed from database inception to 31st January 2026 using the databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Keywords relating to RA, CPPD and chondrocalcinosis were used. Inclusion criteria were studies published in English and those that addressed the co-occurrence of RA and CPPD. RESULTS: The search yielded 24 studies comprising 12 cross-sectional studies, 2 case series, and 10 case reports published between 1965 and 2026. A total of 404 patients had both RA and CPPD, with 397/404 (98.3%) aged over 60 years old. Of 365 patients with serostatus data, 204/339 (60.2%) were seronegative for both rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA). Radiographic chondrocalcinosis was evident in 271/287 (94.4%). Of 271 patients with chondrocalcinosis, 162 (59.8%) were seronegative for both RF and ACPA. The most prescribed medications were methotrexate and prednisolone, in 75/205 (36.6%) and 64/205 (31.2%) patients, respectively. Colchicine was prescribed for 24/205 (11.7%). CONCLUSION: While the studies were small, RA, which is commonly seronegative, and CPPD can co-exist in the elderly. Higher-quality studies are required to determine the prevalence of co-existent RA and CPPD, thereby improving insight into the epidemiology and potentially enhancing outcomes of these patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Probiotic supplementation increases fecal TLR4 agonists without improving disease activity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Gut dysbiosis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), suggesting that microbiota-targeted interventions may influence immune signalling during early immune development. We conducted the PERMAJI multicentre randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effects of probiotic supplementation (VSL#3) on host-microbiota immune interactions and disease activity in children with oligoarticular or RF-negative polyarticular JIA. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive VSL#3 or placebo for 3 months in addition to standard therapy. Stool and serum samples collected at baseline and month 3 were used to assess gut microbiota composition, fecal innate immune agonists, intestinal permeability, and systemic cytokines. The primary clinical endpoint was the proportion achieving an ACR Pedi 30 response at 3 months. Forty-four children were enrolled between September 2017 and July 2022. Clinical responses did not differ between groups (ACR Pedi 30: 47% with VSL#3 vs 63% with placebo; p = 0.33), and conservative worst-case assumptions for missing data suggested lower response rates with VSL#3 (36% vs 68%; p = 0.03). Probiotic supplementation significantly increased fecal Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist activity, whereas gut microbiota diversity, intestinal permeability, and systemic cytokine levels remained unchanged. These findings indicate that probiotic supplementation can modify microbial innate immune signalling without detectable changes in microbial community diversity and may increase exposure to pro-inflammatory microbial stimuli in early-life autoimmune disease. The results highlight the complexity of host-microbiota immune interactions and underscore the need for careful evaluation of microbiome-targeted therapies in paediatric autoimmune disorders.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Stage-specific ROMO1 in rheumatoid arthritis: predictive immune insights into the MIF pathway and HLA-DR/IL2RA axis via integrated GWAS, transcriptomic, single-cell, and spatial profiling.

Emerging evidence links reactive oxygen species modulator 1 (ROMO1), a key mitochondrial ROS regulator, to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathogenesis. However, its exact mechanism remains elusive given the conflicting evidence about its specific function. We used a four-level integrative framework combining multi-omics data and literature‑supported mechanistic inference. At the genetic level, Mendelian randomization (MR) was performed to explore potential causal relationships between ROMO1, IL2RA, HLA-DR, MIF, and RA risk, followed by differential expression analysis and machine learning-based feature selection to identify key mROS genes. The temporal expression dynamics of ROMO1 were assessed in RA progression. At the cellular and tissue levels, we integrated single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics to map cell-type-specific expression and synovial localization of ROMO1-related immune cells and pathways. Finally, our multi-omics findings were contextualized with literature-supported mechanistic inference. (1) MR results were consistent with a potential protective effect of ROMO1 on RA (OR = 0.52) and its potential regulation of risk factors IL2RA (OR = 0.46) and HLA-DR (OR = 0.40). Conversely, IL2RA (OR = 1.42), HLA-DR (OR = 1.88), and MIF (OR = 1.17) were positively associated with RA risk. Additionally, ROMO1 was identified as a top candidate diagnostic predictor with stage-specific dynamics: downregulated in the early but upregulated in the late/remission stages. (2) Single-cell RNA sequencing showed ROMO1's cell-specific expression in CD14+ HLA-DR+ CD74+ monocytes and CD4+ IL2RA+ T cells. Cell communication analysis further suggested that these cells may participate in MIF pathway regulation. Spatial transcriptomics subsequently identified that ROMO1-related cells localized to synovial pathological regions, with MIF pathway changes correlated with RA progression. (3) Finally, literature-supported mechanistic inference suggests that ROMO1 may modulate mROS levels to promote anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage polarization, which could theoretically contribute to reduced systemic inflammation and the alleviation of multi-organ decline in RA. This integrated multi-omics investigation, supported by literature-based mechanistic inference, suggests ROMO1 as a stage-dependent biomarker candidate and potential immune regulator in RA.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Timing of OMERACT core domain measurement in gout clinical trials: a systematic review of randomised trials.

AIMS: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) initiative has endorsed core domain sets for gout trials. The aims of this study were to evaluate the time points and frequencies at which the gout core domains are measured in existing gout urate-lowering therapy and gout flare trials, and whether all collected measurements were reported. METHODS: Urate-lowering therapy (n = 29) and gout flare randomised clinical trials (n = 14) from 2005 were identified from a prior systematic review of core domain reporting. Data were extracted for the time points and frequencies at which each core domain was measured, as well as whether all collected measurements were reported. RESULTS: In urate-lowering therapy trials, the core domains were measured at seven different frequencies. Serum urate and gout flares were most commonly measured monthly, and tophus burden was most commonly measured three monthly. Reporting of all collected measurements varied, from 24/29 (83%) trials for serum urate to 0/2 (0%) trials for activity limitation. In gout flare trials, core domains were measured at nine different frequencies. Pain, joint tenderness and joint swelling were most commonly measured monthly. Reporting of all collected measurements varied, from 13/14 (93%) trials for pain to 3/8 (37.5%) trials for joint tenderness. CONCLUSION: In both urate-lowering therapy and gout flare trials, there is substantial variability in when the core domains are measured, and reporting of collected measurements is inconsistent. This work provides the foundation for a consensus process to establish standardised time points and frequencies for measuring the OMERACT-endorsed gout core domains.

Gout↗

PubMed2026

Timeliness of publication of randomized controlled trials in rheumatology: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the (1) timeliness of publication of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in rheumatology, (2) impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on time to publication, and (3) factors associated with publication delays. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, EBM Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2023 for Phase 3, superiority, parallel-design RCTs that evaluated any treatment for a rheumatologic illness or a rheumatologic treatment for COVID-19 and reported clinical primary efficacy outcome. Outcomes of interest were time to publication after trial completion and publication delay of >2 years after trial completion. RESULTS: 448 RCTs were included in this systematic review. Median time from completion to publication was 549 days and 65.9 % RCTs were published within 2 years of completion. Compared with RCTs on rheumatologic diseases, RCTs on COVID-19 were published sooner (253 vs. 549 days; p < 0.001) and were more likely to be published within 2 years (adjusted OR 9.49, 95 % CI 2.07 to 43.61). Compared with RCTs completed before March 1, 2020, RCTs completed after March 1, 2020, were published sooner (327 vs. 724 days; p < 0.001) and were more likely to be published within 2 years (adjusted OR 9.40, 95 % CI 5.14 to 17.21). Time from RCT completion to submission accounted for most (67 %) of the time to publication. CONCLUSIONS: Publication delay continues to be an important concern in dissemination of clinical research. Most of the delays in publication were attributable to delays in submission to journals after trial completion.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

CoLchicine for Treatment of OsteoArthritis of the Knee (CLOAK): Clinical and biochemical outcomes from a three-month double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) causes pain and progressive disability, but pharmacologic treatments are limited. Colchicine inhibits inflammation that might modulate KOA, but efficacy trials have yielded mixed results. We tested whether colchicine, without concurrent NSAIDs, improved KOA pain, function, synovial effusion size, and OA-associated inflammatory serum biomarkers. METHODS: Participants with symptomatic KOA and radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grades 2/3 were randomized to receive three months of daily colchicine or placebo in a double-blind manner, with no concurrent NSAID use. The primary outcome was between-group change in visual analog score (VAS) for index knee pain. Secondary outcomes included changes in Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), size (depth in millimeters) of sonographically-identified effusions, acetaminophen use, and changes in OA-related serum biomarkers. RESULTS: From baseline to end of study of 120 enrolled participants, no significant differences were observed in improvement of VAS pain, KOOS scores or effusion size. Subsets of participants with more severe VAS pain, worse radiographic disease, or higher hsCRP or serum urate levels at baseline also showed no significant clinical benefit from colchicine compared to placebo. In contrast to the clinical outcomes, colchicine treatment was associated with significant or trending improvement in multiple OA-related serum biomarkers including hsCRP and β-NGF (p < 0.05) and PGE2, IL-1ra, IL-8, and VEGF (p < 0.16). CONCLUSION: This double-blind placebo-controlled trial of colchicine for KOA failed to demonstrate improvement in pain, function, or synovial effusion size in comparison to placebo at three months. Early improvement in OA-associated inflammatory biomarkers suggests a possible longer-term clinical benefit. Clinical Trials Registration No NCT03913442.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in Behçet's disease: A systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Behçet's disease e (BD) is a chronic, relapsing, multisystem inflammatory disorder that if not successfully treated can lead to severe, organ or life-threatening complications. Despite treatment with glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, some patients still have refractory disease that mandates additional therapeutic options. The pathogenesis of BD involves dysregulated innate and adaptive immune responses with multiple cytokines signaling through the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway. By targeting multiple inflammatory pathways, JAK inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic option. However, current evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review to evaluate their efficacy and safety in BD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD420261381955). PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2026. Original clinical studies evaluating Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in BD were included. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Due to heterogeneity, results were synthesized narratively, focusing on efficacy and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (99 patients) were included, predominantly case reports and small observational cohorts with overall high methodological quality. All evaluated tofacitinib, baricitinib, or upadacitinib, with no data on other JAK inhibitors. Patients were highly treatment-refractory, with prior failure of conventional and biologic therapies. Upadacitinib was the most frequently studied agent and demonstrated an overall response rate of 85.2% and complete remission in 59.3% in a multi-center study. Efficacy was observed across multiple domains, with the most consistent responses in intestinal disease, including clinical and endoscopic remission, alongside frequent glucocorticoid-sparing effects. Safety findings were consistent with known JAK inhibitor safety profiles, with mainly mild to moderate infections and manageable laboratory abnormalities, and no clear signal for increased thrombotic events, although follow-up was limited. CONCLUSION: JAK inhibitors demonstrate promising efficacy in BD, particularly in refractory and multisystem disease. The most consistent evidence of efficacy was observed in gastrointestinal involvement, whereas data for other disease domains remain limited. Their safety profile appears consistent with existing data, although further follow up and validation is required. High-quality randomized controlled studies are an imminent need to study the potential role of JAK inhibitors in BD.

Humans↗