Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pseudorabies”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1994

Antibody titers to pseudorabies virus in piglets immunized with gIII deleted pseudorabies vaccine in a pseudorabies infected herd.

The decrease in titer of PRV antibodies in serum was evaluated at 10, 37, 67, 109 and 173 days of age in 16 non-vaccinated pigs and 43 pigs vaccinated at 3, 67 and 80 days of age with a modified live TK/gIII gene deleted pseudorabies virus (PRV) vaccine. Serum samples were analyzed for antibodies to PRV by the serum-virus neutralization test (SN), a commercial competitive ELISA (CELISA), and the CELISA OMNIMARK PRV differential (OMD) diagnostic kit. At 10 days of age, all pigs had SN titers > or = 1:4 and were CELISA+/OMD+, indicating circulating antibodies to field strains of PRV. At 109 days, all non-vaccinated pigs had SN titers < 1:4. Forty-five percent of vaccinated pigs had SN titers > or = 1:4, 56% were CELISA positive and most were CELISA+/OMD-, indicating antibodies due to vaccination. At 24 weeks of age, all pigs had SN titers > or = 1:4 and were CELISA+/OMD+ due to exposure to field strains. Although circulating maternal antibodies interfere with the development of active immunity, vaccination at 3 days of age resulted in detectable antibodies by 67 days of age, and a limited immune response could be measured at 109 days of age.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

An approach to a FMD vaccine based on genetic engineered attenuated pseudorabies virus: one experiment using VP1 gene alone generates an antibody responds on FMD and pseudorabies in swine.

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and pseudorabies (PR) are two important infectious diseases in swine. An attenuated pseudorabies virus (PRV) has been successfully used as a gene delivery vector for the development of live-viral vaccines. In this study, a recombinant PRV-VP1 virus was constructed by fusioning the VP1 gene of FMD virus in frame to the N-terminal sequence of the gG gene of PRV. To test the protective immunity, 15 FMDV sero-negative white swine were divided into three groups and immunized with the recombinant PRV-VP1 virus, commercial FMD vaccine and vector virus (TK(-)/gG(-)/LacZ(+)), respectively, and challenged intramuscularly with 20 minimal infecting doses (MID) of virulent type O FMDV 4 weeks after booster immunization. Swine vaccinated with PRV-VP1 acquired antibodies against both FMDV and PRV, however, anti-FMDV antibodies were much lower than those vaccinated with the commercial FMD vaccine. Our results suggested that the recombinant PRV-VP1 virus, which only expressed FMDV VP1 gene controlled by PRV gG promoter, could not protect swine from the challenge of 20 MID type O FMDV, but could delay and reduce the clinical symptoms of FMD.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of the protective efficacy of recombinant pseudorabies viruses against pseudorabies and classical swine fever in pigs; influence of different promoters on gene expression and on protection.

The glycoprotein E (gE) locus in the genome of pseudorabies virus (PRV) was used as an insertion site for the expression of glycoprotein E1 of classical swine fever virus (CSFV). Transcription of E1 in the recombinants M401, M402 or M403 was regulated by the gD promoter of PRV, the immediate early gene promoter of human cytomegalovirus, or the gE promoter of PRV, respectively. Groups of four pigs were vaccinated once intramuscularly with 10(6) plaque forming units (p.f.u.) of the recombinant viruses and challenged intranasally with 100 50% lethal doses of virulent CSFV and with 10(5) p.f.u. of virulent PRV. All pigs vaccinated with M402 were fully protected against both classical swine fever and pseudorabies.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Live attenuated pseudorabies virus expressing envelope glycoprotein E1 of hog cholera virus protects swine against both pseudorabies and hog cholera.

To investigate whether live attenuated pseudorabies virus (PRV) can be used as a vaccine vector, PRV recombinants that expressed envelope glycoprotein E1 of hog cholera virus (HCV) were generated. Pigs inoculated with these recombinants developed high levels of neutralizing antibodies against PRV and HCV and were protected against both pseudorabies and hog cholera (classical swine fever).

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Productivity and profitability differences between pseudorabies-infected and pseudorabies-noninfected farrow-to-finish swine herds.

Productivity and economic effects of pseudorabies were estimated for a mean-size, farrow-to-finish swine enterprise. A Delphi technique was used to elicit productivity effects from an expert panel. Enterprise budgets for pseudorabies-infected and noninfected herds were constructed by use of these productivity estimates, as well as by use of economic data from secondary sources. Data examined to determine effects on productivity included preweaning, nursery, and growing/finishing pig mortality; breeding hog mortality; feed conversion; labor; and veterinary services and medication expenses. Results indicated that profitability was lowered in infected herds by approximately $6/cwt of swine produced.

Animal Husbandry↗
PubMed2006

A comparison of enhanced green fluorescent protein expression induced by immediate-early cytomegalovirus (IE-CMV) and gG pseudorabies virus (gG-PRV) promoters, using pseudorabies virus amplicons as vectors.

This study compares the expression efficiencies of the IE-CMV and gG-PRV promoters following their transfection into cultured human and monkey cells, using pseudorabies virus amplicons as vectors and enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) as an expression marker. EGFP expression was similarly strong with both promoters. Pseudorabies virus amplicons appear to be useful vectors in gene expression studies due to their replication in the presence of helpers and their wide range of cellular hosts.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Development of a latex agglutination test using the major epitope domain of glycoprotein E of pseudorabies virus expressed in E. coli to differentiate between immune responses in pigs naturally infected or vaccinated with pseudorabies virus.

A 0.8 kb DNA fragment encoding the major epitope domain of glycoprotein E (gE) of pseudorabies virus (PRV) was inserted downstream of the T7 promoter of an expression vector, pET-28b, to yield the recombinant plasmid pETgE804. After induction by isopropy1-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), a high level expression of fusion protein was obtained. SDS-PAGE and western immunoblotting analysis showed that the fusion protein was 38 kDa and could bind with antisera against PRV. The protein existed mainly in the form of the inclusion body. After being denatured and renatured, the protein was used to prepare the latex antigen. The concentration of antigen, temperature and time for sensitization were optimized. The latex agglutination test (LAT) was able to differentiate sera of PRV-infected pigs from those of gE-deletion vaccine-immunized pigs. The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the developed gE latex agglutination test (gE-LAT) were also evaluated by using sets of sera. The diagnostic specificity and diagnostic sensitivity of the gE-LAT were 96.77% and 95.76%, respectively. For comparison between gE-LAT and a commercial blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), 260 serum samples were tested. The coincidence frequency of both assays was 96.94% (252/260). No significant difference was found between the two methods (p>0.05). For comparison between the abilities of gE-LAT and gE-ELISA to detect sera with low titres of gE-specific antibody, 66 sera from 22 pigs were tested. The data indicate that the gE-LAT is of similar sensitivity to gE-ELISA. These results indicate that gE-LAT using recombinant gE might be very useful as a routine screening method for the differential diagnosis of PRV infection.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of two pseudorabies virus vaccines, that differ in capacity to reduce virus excretion after a challenge infection, in their capacity of reducing transmission of pseudorabies virus.

Pseudorabies virus (PRV) vaccines are often compared for their capacity to reduce virus excretion after a challenge infection. Vaccines, used for the eradication of PRV, however, should reduce transmission of PRV among pigs. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the amount of virus excreted after a challenge infection is an accurate measure of the capacity of a vaccine to reduce transmission of PRV among pigs. Two experiments were carried out, each using two groups of 10 pigs. The pigs in group one were intramuscularly vaccinated once with the glycoprotein E (gE)-negative vaccine X, the pigs in group two with the gE-negative strain 783. Eight weeks later, 5 pigs in each group were inoculated with wild-type PRV. A gE-ELISA was used to detect PRV infection. The transmission of PRV was estimated from the number of contact infections and expressed as the reproduction ratio R. The inoculated pigs vaccinated with vaccine X shed significantly more virus than the inoculated pigs vaccinated with strain 783. However, despite the difference in virus excretion, the transmission of PRV between the two groups did not differ. We conclude that virus excretion is not an accurate measure for determining vaccine effectiveness. However, R of vaccine X (R = 0.98) was not significantly below one, whereas R of vaccine 783 (R = 0) was significantly below one. Consequently, we cannot exclude the possibility that major outbreaks of PRV occur among pigs vaccinated with vaccine X.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Detection of pseudorabies virus DNA in individual single-reactor pigs found in certified pseudorabies-free herds.

During monitoring of certified pseudorabies (PRV)-free herds to confirm their PRV -free status, occasional individual gE-seropositive pigs are detected. These single-reactor pigs remain gE-seropositive when further serum samples are collected and tested. For the eradication programme to proceed, it is important to determine whether these pigs are only false positives or are; in fact, infected with field PRV. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) could detect field PRVDNA in single-reactor pigs and so confirm positive reactions in the serologic monitoring programme. First, DNA samples of various tissues from 15 single-reactor pigs all from different herds were examined for field PRV by PCR. Additionally, serum samples from these pigs were analyzed in a gE-confirmation enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (gE-confirmation ELISA). PCR detected PRVDNA in five of the 15 pigs, and these results were confirmed by the gE-confirmation ELISA. The remaining 10 pigs that tested negative in the PCR also tested negative in the gE- confirmation ELISA. We conclude that PCR can be used to discriminate between true and false serological positive single-reactor pigs and, moreover, that the gE-confirmation ELISA confirms these PCR results.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Latent infection and subsequent reactivation of pseudorabies virus in swine exposed to pseudorabies virus while nursing immune dams.

The ability of pseudorabies virus (PRV) to infect and establish latency in pigs with passively acquired (maternal) antibody for PRV was tested by exposing such pigs to the virus and subsequently attempting to reactivate latent virus by administering large doses of dexamethasone. Pigs of each of 4 litters that had nursed gilts with relatively high (512, gilts 1 and 2), moderate (32, gilt 3), and no (less than 2, gilt 4) serum titers of virus-neutralizing (VN) antibodies for PRV were allotted to 3 treatment groups (A, B, C) when they were 2 weeks old. Group-A pigs were separated from littermates and dam and thereafter kept in isolation; group-B pigs were experimentally exposed oronasally to PRV and 1 hour later returned to their dam; group-C pigs were kept with their dam and potentially exposed to PRV by contact with littermates of group B. Sera obtained from pigs at selected intervals until they were 17 weeks old were tested for VN activity and for precipitating activity for radiolabeled viral proteins. All group-A pigs remained clinically normal throughout the experiment. Depending on the initial amount of passively acquired antibody, little or no serum VN or precipitating activity remained by the time these pigs were 17 weeks old. Group-B and -C pigs, with relatively high amounts of passively acquired antibody when exposed to PRV, also remained clinically normal. However, most became latently infected as subsequently evidenced by either dexamethasone-induced or noninduced virus reactivation. Noninduced reactivation may have been initiated by weaning the pigs when they were about 8 weeks old.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Protection of mice and swine from pseudorabies virus-induced mortality by administration of pseudorabies virus-specific mouse monoclonal antibodies.

Hybridomas were selected for secretion of monoclonal antibodies directed against pseudorabies virus (PRV) glycoproteins. Each monoclonal antibody was capable of neutralizing PRV in vitro in the presence of complement. This panel of antibodies was used in passive immunization studies to protect mice and swine from PRV-induced mortality. The most protective antibody in mice was 3A4, specific for PRV glycoprotein gp50, which afforded as high as 100% protection. Although antibody 3A4 was partially protective in swine, antibody 3D11, which is specific for PRV glycoprotein glll, afforded greater protection--83% protection when ascitic fluid was used and 100% protection when immunoglobulin concentrated from cell cultures was used at a dose of 150 mg/pig. These studies demonstrated that monoclonal antibodies may be useful for short-term prophylaxis against PRV-induced disease and that antibody directed against either PRV glycoprotein glll or gp50 is sufficient to protect animals from PRV-induced mortality.

Animals↗
PubMed1982

Immune response of pigs inoculated with virulent pseudorabies virus and pigs inoculated with attenuated or inactivated pseudorabies virus vaccine before and after challenge exposure.

Pseudorabies virus (PRV) antibodies, detectable by indirect radioimmunoassay (IRIA), serum-virus neutralization test (NT), or microimmunodiffusion test (MIDT) were developed within 8 days after pigs were inoculated with virulent PRV or attenuated PRV vaccine. Indirect radioimmunoassay and NT titers in pigs inoculated with virulent PRV were developed at the same rate, with IRIA titers being higher than NT titers. Pigs inoculated with attenuated or inactivated PRV vaccine developed peak mean prechallenge NT antibody titers of 4 and 1 (reciprocals of serum dilutions), respectively. Pigs inoculated with attenuated PRV vaccine had peak mean prechallenge IRIA antibody titers of 6, whereas pigs inoculated with inactivated PRV vaccine had mean IRIA antibody titers of 64. Challenge exposure of swine inoculated with attenuated or inactivated PRV vaccine elicited quantitatively equivalent responses, as measured by IRIA or NT, which were higher than prechallenge titers. There were no false-positive IRIA, NT, or MIDT results obtained when sera from nonvaccinated, nonchallenge-exposed pigs were tested. It appears that the PRV infection status of a seropositive swine herd could be ascertained by serologically monitoring several representative animals from a herd, using the NT. If 2 or more tests of representative animals at 14-day intervals were done and the mean NT titer was 4 or less, it could be concluded that the herd was vaccinated against, but not infected with, virulent virus.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Pseudorabies virus DNA-binding protein stimulates the exonuclease activity and regulates the processivity of pseudorabies virus DNase.

The pseudorabies virus (PRV) DNase is an alkaline exonuclease and endonuclease, which exhibits an Escherichia coli RecBCD-like catalytic function. The PRV DNA-binding protein (DBP) promotes the renaturation of complementary single strands of DNA, which is an essential function for recombinase. To investigate the functional and physical interactions between PRV DBP and DNase, these proteins were purified to homogeneity. PRV DBP stimulated the DNase activity, especially the exonuclease activity, in a dose-dependent fashion. Acetylation of DBP by acetic anhydride resulted in a loss of DNA-binding ability and a 60% inhibition of the DNase activity, suggesting that DNA-binding ability of PRV DBP was required for stimulating the DNase activity. PRV DNase behaved in a processive mode; however, it was converted into a distributive mode in the presence of DBP, implying that PRV DBP stimulated the dissociation of DNase from DNA substrates. The physical interaction between DBP and DNase was further analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and a significant interaction was observed. Thus, these results suggested that PRV DBP interacted with PRV DNase and regulated the DNase activity in vitro.

Acetic Anhydrides↗
PubMed1998

Interaction between pseudorabies virus and heparin/heparan sulfate. Pseudorabies virus mutants differ in their interaction with heparin/heparan sulfate when altered for specific glycoprotein C heparin-binding domain.

Cell surface heparan sulfate serves as an initial receptor for a number of herpesviruses including pseudorabies virus (PrV). It has been demonstrated that the heparan sulfate-binding domain of PrV glycoprotein C is composed of three discrete clusters of basic residues corresponding to amino acids 76-RRKPPR-81, 96-HGRKR-100, and 133-RFYRRGRFR-141, respectively, and that these clusters are functionally redundant, i.e. each of them could independently support PrV attachment to cells (Flynn, S. J., and Ryan, P. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 1355-1364). To evaluate the functional significance of each of these clusters we have used PrV mutants in which, owing to specific alterations in glycoprotein C, the heparan sulfate-binding site is dominated by a single specific cluster. These mutants exhibited different patterns of susceptibility to selectively N-, 2-O-, and 6-O-desulfated heparin preparations in virus attachment/infectivity assay. Moreover PrV mutants differed as regard to efficiency of their attachment to and infection of cells pretreated with relatively low amounts of heparan sulfate-degrading enzymes. Furthermore glycoprotein C species, purified from respective mutants, bound heparin oligosaccharide fragments of different minimum size. These differences suggest that specific clusters of basic amino acids of the heparan sulfate-binding domain of glycoprotein C may support PrV binding to different structural features/stretches within the heparan sulfate chain.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2004

Development of solid - based paper strips for rapid diagnosis of Pseudorabies infection.

Pseudorabies (Aujeszky's disease) is an economically significant disease of swine known to cause central nervous disorders, respiratory disease, reproductive failure and mortality in infected pigs. In attempts to eradicate the disease from becoming endemic, early detection is important to prevent further economic losses and to allow for detection and removal of infected pigs in domestic herds. Thus, a rapid and sensitive technique is necessary for the detection of the virus. For rapid and simple examination, an immuno - chromatographic lateral - flow assay system based on immunologic recognition of specific pseudorabies virus antigen was developed by utilising, as signal generator, colloidal gold conjugated to secondary antibody to detect primary or sample antibody in the sera of pseudorabies infected animals. The pseudorabies virus used as a capture antigen in the test strip was first cultivated in VERO cell culture and then purified by sucrose gradient separation to produce the viral protein concentration of 3.8 mg/ml. The standard pseudorabies antigens reacted well with the hyperimmune serum (HIS). The antibody detection system is basically composed of colloidal gold - labelled antibodies fixed on a conjugate pad, and the complementary pseudorabies antigen immobilised onto a nitrocellulose membrane forming capture zone. If the target antibody is present in a specimen, the colloidal gold-labelled antibody will form a complex with the antibody sample. Subsequently, the formed complex will migrate to the capture zone and is then bound to the solid phase via antigen - antibody interaction. As a result, a signal marker is generated by the accumulation of colloidal gold for detection confirmation. The results obtained demonstrated that the optimum combination of pseudorabies antigen needed as the capture reagent and gold conjugate as secondary antibody recognition marker was at a concentration of 0.38mg/ml and at 1:10 dilution factor respectively. The sensitivity of the solid - based test strip towards pseudorabies antibodies was high with a detection limit of 1 to 10,000 - dilution factor. The specificity of the assay was 100% with no cross - reaction being observed with other sera or antibodies. Accurate reading time needed for confirmation of the assay can be completed in 5 min with a whole blood sample of 25 microl. The colloidal gold - labelled antibody is stable at room temperature for 6 months or more (data not shown). Findings from this study indicated that the solid - based test strip assay system provided high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of pseudorabies at low levels of antibody concentration. The assay was rapid, simple, cheap, and does not require any sophisticated equipment. Thus, the solid based test strip will be a useful serological screening technique or for rapid diagnosis of an infectious disease in target populations of animals characterised by heterogeneous antibody responses.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1998

Enteric lesions induced by different pseudorabies (Aujeszky's disease) virus strains inoculated into closed intestinal loops of pigs.

Three different strains of pseudorabies (Aujeszky's disease) virus were inoculated into ligated closed loops in the jejunum and ileum of five specific-pathogen-free pigs. Infected areas were compared with respect to distribution of histologic lesions and pseudorabies virus antigen. Two wild-type strains of pseudorabies virus produced enteric lesions consisting of necrosis of the subepithelial macrophages in the basilar crypt epithelium, necrosis of the lymphoid follicles in the Peyer's patches, degeneration of the epithelial cells in the crypt and villi, degeneration of the neuronal cells in the myenteric plexuses, and formation of intranuclear inclusion bodies on postinoculation days 2-4. Pseudorabies virus antigen was initially detected in subepithelial macrophages of the dome of Peyer's patches on postinoculation day 2 and subsequently extended to superficial epithelium and deeper into the lymphoid follicles and myenteric plexuses on postinoculation days 3-4. Many pseudorabies virus particles were also detected in the center of their necrotic foci. However, 1 mutant strain (ara-T-resistant) of pseudorabies virus did not produce enteric lesions. The results suggest that the primary target of infection by wild-type strains of pseudorabies virus might be the macrophages distributed in the subepithelial area of the dome Peyer's patches.

Animals↗