Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Procedural Pain”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

The premature infant and painful procedures.

Pain management for premature infants raises challenging questions for nurses. This group of infants is often physiologically fragile and they may undergo frequent painful procedures on a daily basis. Contrary to ideas from the past, premature infants are able to feel pain, and nervous system elements required for the transmission of painful stimuli are functional by 24 weeks gestation. Painful procedures are harmful to the infant's physiological stability and the ability to self-regulate, which includes maintenance of motor control and stable sleep/wake cycles. Assessment of pain in the premature infant is complex. Major indicators of pain include facial grimaces and physiological parameters such as heart rate and oxygen saturation. The Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) is one tool designed specifically for preterm infants. Nonpharmacological nursing measures such as swaddling or nesting and offering a pacifier are useful strategies to help infants cope with painful procedures. The nurse may also maintain a therapeutic environment to assist the infant in self-regulation. Pharmacological agents such as morphine, fentanyl, and acetaminophen are effective in relieving procedural pain. The use of oral sucrose before and during painful procedures offers new possibilities for pain relief. Recent research shows that oral sucrose is a safe and effective analgesic for short-term procedures. Research studies to determine the most effective doses and modes of oral sucrose administration are ongoing. It is thought that the relief of pain is owing to the sweet taste of the sucrose that activates endogenous pain-modulating systems.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2003

Procedural pain in newborns at risk for neurologic impairment.

In the past decade, our knowledge of pain in newborn infants has advanced considerably. However, infants at significant risk for neurologic impairment (NI) have been systematically excluded from almost all research on pain in neonates. The objectives of this study were to compare: (a). the nature, frequency and prevalence of painful procedures, (b). analgesics and sedatives administered, and (c). the relationship between painful procedures and analgesia for neonates at risk for NI. One hundred and ninety-four infants at high (cohort A, n=67), moderate (cohort B, n=59) and low (cohort C, n=68) risk for NI from two tertiary level Neonatal Intensive Care Unit's in Canada were included in a retrospective cohort study on the first 7 days of life. Data were collected from medical records and analyzed using chi-square, ANOVA and regression approaches. All cohorts had a mean of >10 painful procedures per day during the first 2 days of life. There was an interaction effect between cohort group and day of life (F(5,188)=2.13, P<0.06) with cohort A having significantly more painful procedures on day 1 (F(2,191)=4.79, P<0.009). There was no statistical difference in the number of infants who received continuous infusion (F(2,20)=1.9, P=0.13) or bolus (F(2,20)=1.3, P=0.25) opioids or sedatives (F(2,20)=0.45, P=0.84) by cohort over the 7 day period. There was a statistical difference in bolus opioid administration for days 1 (P<0.05) and 2 (P<0.001) with less than 10% of infants in cohort A receiving bolus opioids compared with approximately 22-33% of infants in cohorts B and C. There was a statistically significant correlation between painful procedures and analgesic use (r=0.29, P<0.001), although significant associations existed for cohorts B and C only. The number of painful procedures and study site primarily accounted for the variance (61% in cohort B and 35% in cohort C) in analgesic use, while in cohort A, only study site contributed to the variance (16%). Neonates at the highest risk for NI had the greatest number of painful procedures and the least amount of opioids administered during the first day of life. There was no relationship between painful procedures and analgesic use in this group. As these infants are vulnerable to pain and its consequences, the rational underlying health professional strategies regarding painful procedures and analgesic use for procedural pain in this population urgently awaits exploration.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy and safety of sucrose for procedural pain relief in preterm and term neonates.

BACKGROUND: Preterm and acutely ill term neonates who are hospitalized in a neonatal intensive care unit are subjected to multiple frequent invasive and painful procedures aimed at improving their outcome. Although several trials to determine the efficacy of sucrose for managing procedural pain in preterm and acutely ill term neonates have been developed, these have generally lacked methodological rigor and have not provided clinicians with clear practice guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of three interventions for relieving procedural pain associated with heel lances in preterm and term neonates, and to explore the influence of contextual factors including sex, severity of illness, and prior painful procedures on pain responses. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, 190 neonates were stratified by gestational age and then randomized to receive (a) sucrose and nonnutritive sucking (n = 64), (b) sucrose alone (n = 62), or (c) sterile water and nonnutritive sucking (control) (n = 64) to evaluate the efficacy (pain response as measured using the Premature Infant Pain Profile) (Stevens, Johnson, Petryshen, & Taddio, 1996) and safety (adverse events) following a scheduled heel lance during the first week of life. Stratification was used to control for the effects of age on pain response. RESULTS: Significant differences in pain response existed among treatment groups (F = 22.49, p <.001), with the lowest mean Premature Infant Pain Profile scores in the sucrose and nonnutritive sucking group. Efficacy of sucrose following a heel lance was not affected by severity of illness, postnatal age, or number of painful procedures. Intervention group and sex explained 12% of the variance in Premature Infant Pain Profile scores. Few adverse events occurred (n = 6), and none of them required medical or nursing interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of sucrose and nonnutritive sucking is the most efficacious intervention for single heel lances. Research on the effects of gestational age on the efficacy and safety of repeated doses of sucrose is required.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Pain assessment and procedural pain management practices in neonatal units in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify current pain assessment and procedural pain management practices in neonatal units in Australia. METHODS: Postal survey conducted during December 2003 and January 2004. The survey comprised questions relating to pain assessment scores, pain reduction strategies for minor painful procedures and the use of articulated policies relating to procedural pain management. Participants were the Nurse Unit Managers or their nominees of neonatal intensive care units, special care units and newborn emergency transport services in Australia. RESULTS: Surveys were sent to 181 eligible organizations, and 105 of these were returned (58%). Six units (6%) used pain assessment scores on a regular basis, and 16 units (15%) had an articulated policy directing pain management practices during painful procedures. Non-nutritive sucking and various nursing comfort measures were the pain reduction strategies most frequently used during minor painful procedures. Twenty-four units (23%) used sucrose or other sweet-tasting solutions during procedures; however, the reported frequency of their usage was low. Breast-feeding during venepuncture, heel lance and intramuscular or subcutaneous injection was infrequently practised and topical anaesthetic agents were rarely used. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrates that the majority of Australian neonatal units have no articulated policy to guide pain management during painful procedures and do not regularly undertake pain assessments. Current evidence-based strategies to reduce procedural pain in hospitalized infants are used infrequently.

Australia↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Consistent management of repeated procedural pain with sucrose in preterm neonates: Is it effective and safe for repeated use over time?

OBJECTIVE: Preterm neonates undergo numerous painful procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Sucrose, with and without pacifiers, is effective and safe for relieving pain from single painful events. However, repeated use of sucrose for multiple painful procedures has not been adequately evaluated. The study objectives were to: 1) determine the efficacy and safety of consistent management of repeated procedural pain with sucrose; and 2) explore the impact of consistent pain management on clinical outcomes and neurobiological risk status. METHODS: Sixty-six preterm infants were randomized to receive standard care (positioning and swaddling; n = 21), sterile water plus pacifier (n = 23), or 24% sucrose plus pacifier (n = 22) prior to all painful procedures in the NICU during the first 28 days of life. Also, at a routine heel lance at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of life, data were collected to determine efficacy and immediate and long-term adverse events. Data on clinical outcomes and neurobiological risk status were collected at 28 days or NICU discharge. RESULTS: There was no intervention by time interaction (P = 0.60). There was a significant main effect of intervention (P = 0.03) between the sucrose plus pacifier group, and the standard care group (P = 0.01), but there was no main effect of time (P = 0.72). No group differences existed for adverse events, clinical outcomes, or neurobiological risk status. DISCUSSION: Consistent management of painful procedures with sucrose plus pacifier was effective and safe for preterm neonates during their stay in the NICU. Further exploration of consistent pain management with sucrose on clinical, developmental, and neurobiological outcomes is required.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2000

Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.

BACKGROUND: Management of pain for neonates is less than optimal. The administration of sucrose with and without non-nutritive sucking (pacifiers) has been the most frequently studied non-pharmacological intervention for relief of procedural pain in neonates. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy, effect of dose, and safety of sucrose for relieving procedural pain as assessed by physiologic and/or behavioural indicators. SEARCH STRATEGY: Standard methods as per the Neonatal Collaborative Review Group. A MEDLINE search was carried out for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 1966 - November 1, 1997; EMBASE from 1993-1997; Reference Update search on November 11, 1997 and search of the Cochrane Library Issue 4 on November 11, 1997. Key words and (MeSH) terms included, infant/newborn, pain, analgesia and sucrose. Personal files, bibliographies, the most recent relevant neonatal and pain journals and conference proceedings were searched manually. Unpublished studies were not included. Language restrictions were not imposed. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs in which term and/or preterm neonates undergoing heel lance, venepuncture or intramuscular injection (immunization) received sucrose or water/placebo or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed according to the methods of the Neonatal Collaborative Review Group. Quality measures included; blinding of randomization, blinding of intervention, completeness of follow up and blinding of outcome measurement. Data were abstracted and independently checked for accuracy by the two investigators. The inconsistency in outcome measures and differences in the statistical reporting of results made meta-analysis impossible. We were not able to identify two studies in which the same physiologic and/or behavioral outcomes following a noxious stimulus (heel-lance, venepuncture, intramuscular injection) were measured and reported in an identical fashion using means and standard deviations (or standard errors). The results are therefore reported for each accepted study separately. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified for possible inclusion in this systematic review. Five studies were excluded; three RCTs were excluded as in these trials the number of infants randomized to treatment vs. placebo groups were not reported; one study was not an RCT, and in one RCT the neonates did not undergo a painful procedure. Ten RCTs were included in this review. Sucrose in a wide range of dosages was generally found to decrease univariate physiologic (heart rate) and behavioural (the mean percent time crying, total cry duration, duration of first cry, and facial action) pain indicators and multivariate [Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP)] pain outcomes in neonates undergoing heelstick or venepuncture. An optimal dose of sucrose to reduce pain associated with procedures in preterm and term neonates could not be identified through this systematic review. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Sucrose reduces physiologic and/or behavioral indicators of stress/pain in neonates following procedural pain stimuli (heel lance, venepuncture, immunization). There was inconsistency in the dose of sucrose that was effective and an optimal dose to be used in preterm and/or term infants could not be identified. Considerations for future research are to describe the painful procedure and intervention in detail, to use appropriate sample size to show a statistically significant reduction in pain, to use a multidimensional conceptualization of pain, to select outcome measures that are reliable and valid pain indicators and to account for the variation in the infant's response and context in which the pain is experienced. The use of repeated administrations of sucrose in neonates needs to be investigated. Use of sucrose in neonates that are very low birth weight, unstable and/or ventilated also needs to be addressed. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Analgesics↗
PubMed1999

Procedural pain in newborn infants: the influence of intensity and development.

OBJECTIVE: Previous reports have shown that pain is managed inadequately in newborn infants. Ironically, clinicians believe that infants can experience pain much like adults, that infants are exposed daily to painful procedures, and that pain protection should be provided. In adults, a close relationship has been shown in how adults behave in response to pain, how painful they sense the stimulus to be, and physical measurements of the intensity of the stimulus. Whether similar parallels exist in newborn infants has not been examined. If these parallels do not exist in infants, it may help explain why clinicians fail to manage procedural pain in infants more effectively. The objective of this study was to determine whether the magnitude of infants' responses to nursing/medical procedures: 1) differs as a function of the invasiveness or intensity of the procedure; 2) differs as a function of intrauterine (gestational age at birth) and/or extrauterine (conceptional age) development; and 3) parallels the subjective pain ratings of clinicians for those procedures. METHODS: A broad developmental and clinical range of newborn infants was studied shortly before (baseline and preparatory periods), throughout, and shortly after (recovery period) required nursing/medical procedures during hospitalization. Heart rate, oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressure, and behavioral state (percentage of time spent in sleep or in agitation) were measured, and the magnitude of change in each in response to procedures was calculated. Procedures were categorized as mildly, moderately, and highly invasive to examine differences in response magnitude as a function of procedural invasiveness. Responses were compared as a function of prematurity and postnatal age. Clinicians' procedural pain ratings were compared with the magnitude of infants' responses. RESULTS: Of the original 152 infants, 135 were studied at least two times (range 2-27). Significant changes occurred in physiologic and behavioral measures in response to procedures indicative of pain responses. The magnitude of response generally increased with increased procedural invasiveness although there was considerable overlap of magnitude with invasiveness. Both premature and full-term infants differentiated procedural invasiveness. Very premature infants (<28 weeks' gestational age) exhibited increased increments in response magnitude with increasing postnatal age. Clinician's ratings of procedural painfulness were correlated with and predicted the magnitude of heart rate response to individual procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to what has been shown in adults, newborn and developing infants show increased magnitude physiologic and behavioral responses to increasingly invasive procedures, demonstrating that even very prematurely born infants respond to pain and differentiate stimulus intensity. However, the considerable overlap of magnitude with invasiveness suggests that there is not a physiologic or behavioral threshold that clearly marks the presence of pain. Inconsistencies in physiologic and behavioral responses make reliance on a pain index difficult. The best approach may be one of universal precaution to provide pain management systematically to reduce the acute and long-term impact of early procedural pain. development, stimulus intensity, pain response.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2002

Efficacy of sucrose as analgesia for procedural pain in neonates.

BACKGROUND: Most infants experience painful procedures during their first days. Minimization of pain to decrease noxious effects is warranted. This Critically Appraised Topic (CAT) evaluates a meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined sucrose as analgesia for neonatal procedural pain. PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and optimal dosing of sucrose for neonatal procedural pain. METHODS: A literature search identified 5 studies that met criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis, for a total of 271 infants studied. The primary outcome measure was crying time, measured for 3 minutes after a painful procedure following administration of water or varying doses of sucrose. RESULTS: There was no difference in crying time between the 0.18 g sucrose and water groups (P > 0.05), but crying time was significantly less in the other sucrose groups. Doses of at least 0.24 g (2 mL 12% sucrose) were found to be most effective. No adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSION: This CAT systematically appraises this meta-analysis, provides clinical bottom lines, and includes recommendations for practice.

Analgesia↗
PubMed2006

The efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of procedural pain in preterm and term neonates. A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit are exposed to a high number of painful procedures. Since repeated and sustained pain can have consequences for the neurological and behaviour-oriented development of the newborn, the greatest attention needs to be paid to systematic pain management in neonatology. Non-pharmacological treatment methods are being increasingly discussed with regard to pain prevention and relief either alone or in combination with pharmacological treatment. AIMS: To identify effective non-pharmacological interventions with regard to procedural pain in neonates. METHODS: A literature search was conducted via the MedLine, CINAHL, Cochrane Library databases and complemented by a handsearch. The literature search covered the period from 1984 to 2004. Data were extracted according to pre-defined criteria by two independent reviewers and methodological quality was assessed. RESULTS: 13 randomised controlled studies and two meta-analyses were taken into consideration with regard to the question of current nursing practice of non-pharmacological pain management methods. The selected interventions were "non-nutritive sucking", "music", "swaddling", "positioning", "olfactory and multisensorial stimulation", "kangaroo care" and "maternal touch". There is evidence that the methods of "non-nutritive sucking", "swaddling" and "facilitated tucking" do have a pain-alleviating effect on neonates. CONCLUSIONS: Some of the non-pharmacological interventions have an evident favourable effect on pulse rate, respiration and oxygen saturation, on the reduction of motor activity, and on the excitation states after invasive measures. However, unambiguous evidence of this still remains to be presented. Further research should emphasise the use of validated pain assessment instruments for the evaluation of the pain-alleviating effect of non-pharmacological interventions.

Humans↗
PubMed2003

[Use of propofol for painful procedures in cancer pain management].

BACKGROUND: Patients with intractable cancer pain often require non-pharmacological analgesic treatment that is accompanied by procedure-related pain. Previous works have shown that propofol infusion in adjunction to regional anesthesia provides appropriate sedation during such painful procedures. However, there are a few reports of its use to reduce procedure-related pain in terminal cancer patients. We report cases of propofol sedation during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in patients with metastatic vertebral compression fracture. METHODS: Propofol was infused during PVP in eleven cancer patients after obtaining written informed consent. The infusion rate of propofol was adjusted using a target-controlled infusion pump to achieve appropriate sedation levels under monitoring bispectral index of the electroencepharogram. Hepatic and renal functions were evaluated using common serum markers, which were determined using standard hospital laboratory methods. RESULTS: The duration of the procedure was 65.5 +/- 5.5 (mean +/- SD) min. The required infusion rate was 8.66 +/- 1.50 mg.kg-1.hr-1. The interval from the termination of the infusion until emergence was 10.7 +/- 4.2 min. No life-threatening complications or significant changes in liver and renal functions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol can be used effectively and safely for sedation during PVP in terminal cancer patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

No more tears: a randomized controlled double-blind trial of Amethocaine gel vs. placebo in the management of procedural pain in neonates.

AIM: During a comparative double-blind study, the efficacy of Amethocaine local anaesthetic gel was compared with that of a placebo gel to establish their effect on the reduction of behavioural and physiological responses to pain in neonates. METHOD: Forty infants were included in the trial, 20 being randomly assigned to each group. After topical application of either Amethocaine or the placebo for 30 minutes, cannulation was performed using a 24 gauge cannula. Assessment of pain was made with the aid of four point assessment tool incorporating facial expression, cry and heart rate changes and ease of cannulation. Additional baseline data were obtained including sex, gestation, weight and previous experience of cannulation, and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). RESULTS: Good analgesic effects were demonstrated in the Amethocaine group, as there was a high level of significance (P < 0.01) in the difference in pain scores between the two groups using a Mann-Whitney U-test. There was no correlation between gestation or weight and the degree of pain experienced during painful procedures. No significant relationship was found between cannulation and the degree of pain experienced. CONCLUSION: It can, therefore, be concluded that Amethocaine gel is an effective local anaesthetic in the management of skin puncturing procedural pain in neonates, and that all infants regardless of maturity, weight or previous experiences probably experience a similar degree of pain and therefore warrant effective and appropriate analgesic intervention.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1996

Reliability and validity of the Faces and Word Descriptor Scales to measure procedural pain.

Reliability and validity of the Faces and Word Descriptor Scales to measure pain in verbal children undergoing painful procedures were assessed. Test-retest reliability and construct and discriminant validity were supported for both instruments among a sample of 118 children in three age groups (3-7, 8-12, 13-18). Construct validity was determined by comparisons with a visual analogue scale and a numerical scale with known validity. A majority of the children preferred to use the Faces scale when providing self-report of pain regardless of age. The Faces and Word Descriptor Scales are valid and reliable instruments to measure procedural pain intensity.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

State of the science: procedural pain management in the neonate.

Neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit experience painful procedures. Over the last 10 years, investigators have examined several pharmacologic and nonpharmacolgic treatment strategies to decrease or eliminate the pain associated with mechanical ventilation, endotrachial intubation, insertion of percutaneous or central venous lines, heel stick, and venipuncture. These procedures and others are addressed as well as the reported severity of pain associated with these procedures. Progress has been made in the past decade to establish evidence-based treatments that will help the clinician more effectively relieve neonatal stress and pain when performing many routine procedures.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Alfentanil as procedural pain relief in newborn infants.

AIMS: To assess the need for, and the suitability of, alfentanil for pain relief during tracheal suction used in assisted ventilation in newborn infants. METHODS: In a randomised, controlled, double blind, crossover trial, placebo (10 micrograms/kg) and 20 micrograms/kg alfentanil were infused in random order two minutes before three separate endotracheal suctions, at least six hours apart, to 10 infants. Measurements were made of physiological variables, behaviour, and stress hormones. RESULTS: After placebo infusion heart rate significantly increased (median 14; interquartile range 12-16 beats/minute) as did behavioural pain score (5; 3-5). Alfentanil (20 micrograms/kg) attenuated the heart rate increase, normalised the pain score, and caused a decrease in plasma adrenaline activity (0.3; 0.2-0.7 nmol/l). Noradrenaline concentration showed a nonsignificant decreasing trend with increasing alfentanil dose and beta endorphin was unchanged. Rigidity was noted in the placebo (n = 2), 10 micrograms/kg (n = 2), and 20 micrograms/kg (n = 5) alfentanil groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tracheal suction is a painful procedure. The dose of alfentanil required for pain relief (20 micrograms/kg) causes a high incidence of rigidity and thus should be used only with muscle relaxant.

Alfentanil↗
PubMed2005

Effect of foremilk and hindmilk on simple procedural pain in newborns.

BACKGROUND: Infants are exposed to painful stimuli during routine medical care in the first few days of life. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of foremilk; hindmilk, which has been known to have more fat content than foremilk; and sterile water in reducing pain in newborns undergoing minor painful procedures. METHODS: Sixty-two healthy term infants requiring a heel prick blood sample for screening tests were randomly allocated to receive 2 mL of foremilk, hindmilk or sterile water. Median crying time, duration of the first cry, percent change in heart rate, maximum heart rate and neonatal facial coding system scores were recorded to assess the infants' response to pain. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between the three groups were not found in terms of crying time, duration of the first cry, percent change in heart rate or maximum heart rate (P = 0.19, P = 0.08, P = 0.22 and P = 0.91, respectively). When the mean pain scores of the groups were compared at 0, 1, 2 and 3 min, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups (P = 0.58, P = 0.55, P = 0.58 and P = 0.84 for 0, 1, 2 and 3 min, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although hindmilk has a minor superiority in terms of crying time, duration of the first cry and percent change in heart rate, it does not reach statistical significance. It is concluded that neither foremilk nor hindmilk is superior in relieving pain when compared to placebo.

Blood Specimen Collection↗
PubMed2003

Use of Entonox in the community for control of procedural pain.

Nitrous oxide gas, mixed 50:50 with oxygen, is an effective and safe analgesic which, although widely used in many areas of clinical practice, has not been fully recognized in the community setting for painful procedures. The reasons why it has not been implemented and used to the patient's advantage have been suggested as apathy, lack of confidence, lack of knowledge and lack of resources. The author describes how, following a review of the literature pertaining to its use in other clinical areas, she has successfully introduced nitrous oxide/oxygen into her trust, with positive results.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

CT-guided pain procedures for intractable pain in malignancy.

CT-guided stereotactic percutaneous destructive procedures, i.e. percutaneous cordotomy, trigeminal tractotomy, and extralemniscal myelotomy, have been routinely used for the treatment of localized intractable pain in malignancy since 1987. In 67 cases if local pain due to malignancy, CT guided percutaneous cordotomy was performed and in 97% complete pain control was achieved. In 45 of these cases, a "selective cordotomy" was performed meaning that analgesia was produced only in the painful region of the body. CT guided trigeminal tractotomy was applied to a total of 19 cases in 5 of which pain had been caused by malignancy. The results were satisfactory. 12 cases, suffering from visceral pain due to malignancy, were treated by CT-guided extralemniscal myelotomy and in 10 cases pain relief was achieved.

Functional Laterality↗