Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Preanesthetic Medication”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

[Influence of preanesthetic medication on the effect of a local anesthetic tape].

We investigated the influence of preanesthetic medication on the pain relieving effect of the lidocaine tape during needle insertion for venous cannulation. Ninety patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomly divided into three groups of 30 each; patients without preanesthetic medication (group N), patients who received 0.1 mg.kg-1 of diazepam (group D) and 5 micrograms.kg-1 of clonidine (group C) as a preanesthetic medication. Ninety minutes before the induction of anesthesia, we applied a lidocaine tape to each patient. The grade of pain at the pinprick test and at the venous puncture was evaluated in the operating room. No significant difference of the pain score was seen between the groups. We concluded that the effect of lidocaine tape was not influenced by the preanesthetic medication.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed1993

Effect of preanesthetic medication on ease of endoscopic intubation of the duodenum in anesthetized dogs.

The effects of preanesthetic medication on ease of duodenal endoscopic intubation in dogs was evaluated. One of 12 combinations of preanesthetic medications (using atropine, glycopyrrolate, morphine, meperidine, acepromazine, and 0.9% NaCl solution) was administered IM to each of 12 dogs in a trial. Twelve endoscopic trials were performed so that each dog received each treatment combination once. Anesthesia was induced with thiamylal administered IV and maintained with halothane vaporized in oxygen. Electrocardiographic recordings, indirect blood pressure measurements, end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressures, and halothane concentrations were monitored during the anesthetic period. The ease with which the fiberoptic endoscope was passed into the proximal portion of the duodenum was qualitatively score on the basis of time and maneuvering effort. None of the preanesthetic combinations made intubation of the duodenum significantly easier than that with 0.9% NaCl solution (control). Only the combination of morphine and atropine induced gastro-pyloric conditions that resulted in significantly higher (more difficult) endoscopic scores than those after preanesthetic medication with 0.9% NaCl solution.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Evaluation of the perioperative stress response in dogs administered medetomidine or acepromazine as part of the preanesthetic medication.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative stress response in dogs administered medetomidine or acepromazine as part of the preanesthetic medication. ANIMALS: 42 client-owned dogs that underwent elective ovariohysterectomy. PROCEDURE: Each dog was randomly allocated to receive medetomidine and butorphanol tartrate (20 microgram/kg and 0.2 mg/kg, respectively, IM) or acepromazine maleate and butorphanol (0.05 and 0.2 mg/kg, respectively, IM) for preanesthetic medication. Approximately 80 minutes later, anesthesia was induced by administration of propofol and maintained by use of isoflurane in oxygen. Each dog was also given carprofen before surgery and buprenorphine after surgery. Plasma concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol, and beta-endorphin were measured at various stages during the perioperative period. In addition, cardiovascular and clinical variables were monitored. RESULTS: Concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol were significantly lower for dogs administered medetomidine. Concentrations of beta-endorphin did not differ between the 2 groups. Heart rate was significantly lower and mean arterial blood pressure significantly higher in dogs administered medetomidine, compared with values for dogs administered acepromazine. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicate that for preanesthetic medications, medetomidine may offer some advantages over acepromazine with respect to the ability to decrease perioperative concentrations of stress-related hormones. In particular, the ability to provide stable plasma catecholamine concentrations may help to attenuate perioperative activation of the sympathetic nervous system.

Acepromazine↗
PubMed1989

Comparison of oral and intramuscular preanesthetic medication for pediatric inpatient surgery.

The child's fear of injections coupled with the concern that the psychologic advantage of intramuscular premedication may be all or in part negated by the trauma of injections prompted the authors to seek an oral preanesthetic medication to safely and reliably replace injections. The authors describe the results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing the pharmacologic effects of oral versus injectable preanesthetic medication in 67 healthy pediatric inpatients older than 1 yr. Children given the oral medication (meperidine 3.0 mg/kg, pentobarbital 4.0 mg/kg) were significantly more drowsy in the holding area (P less than 0.001) and more cooperative at the time of induction of anesthesia (P less than 0.01) than the children given intramuscular medication (morphine 0.1 mg/kg, pentobarbital 4.0 mg/kg). There were no other differences between the two groups. These data demonstrate that oral preanesthetic medication can be as or more effective compared with intramuscular medication in producing the desired effects without adverse side effects. As a result of this study, the benefits of preanesthetic medication can now be achieved in nearly all surgical patients without injections.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

Oral midazolam preanesthetic medication in pediatric outpatients.

A need exists for a safe and effective oral preanesthetic medication for use in children undergoing elective surgical procedures. We evaluated the effectiveness of three different doses of oral midazolam when administered in combination with atropine prior to ambulatory surgery. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 124 children, ages 1-10 yr, received midazolam, 0.25, 0.50, or 0.75 mg.kg-1 po, and atropine, 0.03 mg.kg-1 po, mixed with apple juice, or a placebo (containing the midazolam vehicle, atropine, and apple juice). A blinded observer noted the child's level of sedation, the quality of separation from parents, and the degree of cooperation with an inhalation induction of anesthesia. Picture-recall was used to assess the amnesic effect of midazolam in children over 5 yr of age. Midazolam 0.75 mg.kg-1 produced significant sedation at 30 min. After procedures lasting an average of 106-113 min, recovery was not prolonged by the oral midazolam-atropine combination. We concluded that oral midazolam 0.5-0.75 mg.kg-1 is an effective preanesthetic medication for pediatric outpatients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

A comparison of oral clonidine and oral midazolam as preanesthetic medications in the pediatric tonsillectomy patient.

UNLABELLED: We compared the effects of oral clonidine (4 microg/kg) and midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) on the preanesthetic sedation and postoperative recovery profile in children during tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy. In a double-blinded, double-dummy study design, 134 ASA physical status I-II children aged 4-12 yr were randomized to receive a combination of either clonidine and placebo (Group A), or placebo and midazolam (Group B) at 60-90 min and 30 min, respectively, before the induction of anesthesia. Children in the clonidine group exhibited more intense anxiety on separation and during induction of anesthesia via a mask as measured by the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scores. They also had significantly lower mean intraoperative arterial blood pressures, shorter surgery, anesthesia, and emergence times, and a decreased need for supplemental oxygen during recovery compared with the midazolam group. However, the clonidine group had larger postoperative opioid requirements, maximum excitement and pain scores based on the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario scale in the Phase 1 postanesthetic care unit. There were no differences between the two groups in the times to discharge readiness, postoperative emesis, unanticipated hospital admission rates, postdischarge maximum pain scores, and 24 h analgesic requirements. The percentage of parents who were completely satisfied with the child's preoperative experience was significantly higher in the midazolam group. There were no differences in parental satisfaction with the recovery period. We conclude that under the conditions of this study, oral midazolam is superior to oral clonidine as a preanesthetic medication in this patient population. IMPLICATIONS: We compared preanesthetic sedation and postoperative recovery after oral clonidine (4 microg/kg) and midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) in children during tonsillectomy. The clonidine group had greater preoperative anxiety and shorter surgery and anesthesia times, but required more postoperative analgesia. Delayed recovery and discharge times did not differ. Midazolam was superior to clonidine as oral preanesthetic medication for these patients.

Adenoidectomy↗
PubMed1991

Dose-finding study of intramuscular midazolam preanesthetic medication in the elderly.

Intramuscular midazolam frequently results in excessive sedation in elderly patients. The effects of preanesthetic medication with intramuscular midazolam were examined in 100 elderly patients, aged 60-86 yr, given 1, 2, or 3 mg midazolam or placebo using a randomized, double-blind study design. Level of sedation and anxiety were assessed every 15 min for 1 h. Picture cards were presented at the same times in order to assess recall of these cards 24 h later. All three doses of midazolam produced rapid onset of sedation, anxiolysis, and anterograde amnesia. These effects decreased in intensity by 60 min after drug injection. The intensity and extent of these effects were comparable with those reported with higher doses in younger patients, although with the 1-mg midazolam dose the effects were shorter-lived, and a difference from placebo was not consistently seen. Three patients (3%), all older than 70 yr, became unresponsive to vocal and tactile stimuli. This level of drowsiness was unrelated to body weight, age, or ASA physical status. We conclude that in adults between 60-69 yr old, midazolam 2 or 3 mg intramuscularly can be effective as preanesthetic medication without causing excessive drowsiness. However, intramuscular midazolam should be used cautiously, under continuous observation, in patients aged 70 yr and older because excessive drowsiness may occur.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Preanesthetic medication in children: a comparison of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate versus placebo.

Initial studies have suggested that oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) in a dose of 15-20 micrograms/kg may be a safe and effective preanesthetic medication in children and adults, but this has not been demonstrated in a randomized, double-blind fashion. The purpose of this study was to determine in a randomized, double-blind manner, the efficacy of a lollipop containing fentanyl citrate as a preanesthetic medication before surgery in children. Forty health ASA physical status 1 or 2 children 3-12 yr of age were divided randomly and in double-blind fashion into two groups. Group 1 received the lollipop containing OTFC and group 2 received a placebo lollipop. An appropriate size lollipop was chosen so that if the patient received fentanyl, the total dose would be 15-20 micrograms/kg. Anxiety, sedation, and separation scores were assessed preoperatively and ease of induction was rated. Oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were monitored. Time intervals from preanesthetic to induction and from recovery room (PACU) admission to discharge were noted. Recovery room behavior was assessed upon admission and discharge. Complications and the need for postoperative opioids were noted. OTFC produced significantly more sedation and less anxiety compared with that following placebo. Respiratory rate was significantly decreased in the OTFC group, but oxygen saturation was not significantly different between groups. Anxiety and separation scores and the quality of induction were better in the OTFC group. There was a higher incidence of nausea and pruritus in the fentanyl group. OTFC did not prolong the PACU stay.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

Effect of preanesthetic medication on carbon dioxide tension in children with congenital heart disease.

Hypercarbia during the postoperative period following repair of congenital heart defects in children has been associated with acute pulmonary hypertension. Because decreases in respiratory rate (RR) and digital pulse oximetry (SpO2) have been observed after preanesthetic medication of similar children, it is possible that hypercarbia and pulmonary hypertension may be unappreciated risks in premedicated children during the preoperative period. As the first step in addressing this question, changes in transcutaneous and end-tidal PCO2 (PtcCO2 and PetCO2) were examined after preanesthetic medication of children prior to cardiac surgery. Forty-four children were randomly assigned to receive either intramuscular morphine, 0.2 mg/kg, and scopolamine, 0.01 mg/kg, or oral midazolam, 0.75 mg/kg, 1 hour before anesthetic induction. PtcCO2, PetCO2, SpO2, RR, and sedation score were monitored. Significant sedation occurred after both premedication regimens. Following morphine/scopolamine, PtcCO2 increased from 36 +/- 4 (mean +/- SD) to 43 +/- 6 mmHg (P < 0.01), PetCO2 increased from 35 +/- 3 to 40 +/- 5 mmHg (P < 0.01), SpO2 decreased from 93 +/- 2 to 91 +/- 4% (P < 0.01), and RR decreased from 30 +/- 10 to 24 +/- 7 breaths/minute (P < 0.01). After midazolam, PtcCO2 increased from 35 +/- 4 to 40 +/- 6 mmHg (P < 0.01), PetCO2 increased from 34 +/- 5 to 39 +/- 3 mmHg (P < 0.01), SpO2 decreased from 93 +/- 6 to 90 +/- 7% (P < 0.01), and RR decreased from 33 +/- 13 to 30 +/- 13 breaths/minute (P < 0.01). Clinically significant increases in PtcCO2 (> 45 mmHg) occurred in nine patients, including five with pulmonary hypertension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Blood Gas Monitoring, Transcutaneous↗
PubMed1991

Double-blind comparison of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate with oral meperidine, diazepam, and atropine as preanesthetic medication in children with congenital heart disease.

The effectiveness of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) as preanesthetic medication was compared with oral meperidine, diazepam, and atropine (MDA) in 40 pediatric patients scheduled to undergo repair of congenital heart defects. In a double-blinded manner, patients received a fentanyl lollipop (20-25 micrograms/kg) and a placebo oral solution (0.4 ml/kg) (n = 20) or a placebo lollipop and an oral solution (0.4 ml/kg) of meperidine (1.5 mg/kg), diazepam (0.2 mg/kg), and atropine (0.02 mg/kg) (n = 20). The patient's vital signs, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2), as well as activity and apprehension scores were evaluated and recorded at baseline and at 10-min intervals. The patient's emotional status at the time of parental separation and at induction of anesthesia were also assessed. Side effects and onset of action were observed. After OTFC, onset of sedation was significantly faster than with the oral solution of meperidine, diazepam, and atropine. In both groups there was no significant change in heart rate. Although systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate showed statistically significant decreases, these changes were not clinically significant. The child's emotional status at the time of separation from the parents and during induction was similar in both groups. Side effects with OTFC were more frequent: nose itching occurred in 65%, body itching in 10%, and vomiting in 30%. Two patients (10%) in the OTFC-treated group became hypoxemic (SpO2 less than 90) and required supplemental oxygen. In the group receiving oral meperidine, diazepam, and atropine, 10% had mild facial pruritus and 5% complained of a dry mouth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1992

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for preanesthetic medication of pediatric day surgery patients with and without droperidol as a prophylactic anti-emetic.

he safety and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) as a preanesthetic medication and the efficacy of droperidol as a prophylactic anti-emetic were evaluated in 100 children aged 2-8 yr undergoing general anesthesia for outpatient surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups and managed in a double-blinded manner: 1) placebo lozenge 45 min preoperatively and placebo (normal saline) injected intravenously after induction of anesthesia; 2) placebo lozenge 45 min preoperatively and 50 micrograms/kg droperidol intravenously after induction; 3) 15-20 micrograms/kg OTFC lozenge 45 min preoperatively and placebo intravenously after induction; and 4) 15-20 micrograms/kg OTFC lozenge 45 min preoperatively and droperidol 50 micrograms/kg intravenously after induction. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with halothane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. Heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2) were monitored throughout the study. Scoring systems were used to evaluate sedation, anxiety, cooperation, and ease and quality of anesthetic induction. Emergence, recovery, and discharge times were recorded. Nausea, vomiting, and adverse effects were noted. Preoperatively, children receiving OTFC had significantly greater sedation, slower respiratory rates, lower SpO2, and less excitement during induction. Postoperative nausea and vomiting occurred significantly more frequently after OTFC than after placebo. Prophylactic droperidol did not significantly reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting. The authors conclude that, in pediatric surgical outpatients, OTFC reliably induces preoperative sedation and facilitates inhalation induction of anesthesia, but it is associated with significant decreases in respiratory rate and SpO2 and a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting that is not significantly reduced by prophylactic droperidol.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

Preanesthetic medication with rectal midazolam in children undergoing dental extractions.

Three different dosages (0.25, 0.35, and 0.45 mg/kg) of rectally administered midazolam were compared with each other and with placebo for preanesthetic medication in children undergoing dental extractions. Eighty patients between the ages of 2 and 10 years were randomly allocated into four groups in this double-blind study. The results from this trial show that 30 minutes after rectal administration of all doses of midazolam, good anxiolysis, sedation, and cooperation were obtained in most patients. A high prevalence (23%) of disinhibition reactions was observed, particularly in the 0.45 mg/kg group. For this reason, 0.25 or 0.35 mg/kg appears to be the dose of choice when rectal midazolam is used for premedication in children.

Administration, Rectal↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Heart-rate slowing and junctional rhythm following intravenous succinylcholine with and without intramuscular atropine preanesthetic medication.

The incidence of heart-rate slowing (greater than 15 percent) and junctional rhythm after two injections of succinylcholine (1 mg/kg), separated by 5 minutes, was determined in adult patients. All patients received intramuscular morphine as preanesthetic medication 60 to 90 minutes before intravenous thiamylal anesthetic induction. Intramuscular atropine (mcg/kg) 60 to 90 or 15 to 20 minutes before anesthetic induction did not alter the incidence of first or second succinylcholine dose heart-rate slowing or junctional rhythm as compared with patients receiving only morphine premedication.

Anesthesia, Endotracheal↗
PubMed1998

[A survey of opioid use in preanesthetic medication].

A mailing survey was carried out to assess the current practice of sedative premedication in anesthesia. Questionnaires were sent by mail to 77 university hospitals. We especially evaluated use of opioids for premedication. Sixty-one percent (n = 47) of the hospitals answered these questionnaires and 31 percent (n = 15) of them were using opioids for the preanesthetic medication. Pethidine was used most frequently for premedication of all opioids, and morphine was often used for the premedication before cardiac surgery. All opioids were administrated intramusculary both in adults and children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Preanesthetic medication with intranasal midazolam for brief pediatric surgical procedures. Effect on recovery and hospital discharge times.

BACKGROUND: The perfect preanesthesia medication and its ideal route of administration are still debated, but for pediatric surgical patients undergoing brief procedures, preanesthesia medication is frequently omitted because of the concern that it will prolong the child's recovery from anesthesia. The effects of nasally administered midazolam on anesthetic recovery and hospital discharge times were determined in 88 ASA physical status 1 and 2 ambulatory surgical patients undergoing a brief surgical procedure. METHODS: Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, 88 ambulatory surgical patients 10-36 months of age undergoing myringotomy and tube insertion were entered into the study. All patients were randomly assigned to one of three medication groups. One group received 0.2 mg/kg intranasal midazolam; a second group received 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam; and the third group received intranasal saline drops. All patients were anesthetized with nitrous oxide, oxygen, and halothane administered via mask. The duration of anesthesia lasted between 9 and 10 min. After preanesthetic medication, the children were evaluated for ease of separation and induction of anesthesia. In addition, the time from when the anesthetic was discontinued until the child recovered from anesthesia and the time the child was discharged home were recorded by a nurse observer blinded to the patient grouping. RESULTS: Children receiving midazolam had smoother, calmer parent-child separation and anesthesia induction scores, and their anesthesia recovery times and hospital discharge times were the same as those receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: For children undergoing brief surgical procedures, nasal midazolam provides satisfactory anxiolysis without delaying anesthesia recovery and hospital discharge.

Administration, Intranasal↗