Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pirenzepine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Selectivity of pirenzepine in the central nervous system. III. Differential effects of multiple pirenzepine and scopolamine administrations on muscarinic receptors as measured autoradiographically.

The effects of intrahippocampal injections of scopolamine and pirenzepine on muscarinic receptor binding were examined by quantitative autoradiographic techniques. Brain slices from animals which had received 7 injections of either scopolamine (n = 5) or pirenzepine (n = 5) over a 22-day injection schedule were compared with slices from 5 saline-injected controls for receptor binding to the whole slice and within selected regions of the brain as measured autoradiographically. The total number of receptors was determined from direct binding assays with 1-[3H]quinuclidinyl-benzilate ([3H]-1-QNB), while the binding of the selective ligands pirenzepine, carbamylcholine, and scopolamine was examined through inhibition studies. The data from the whole slices indicated that pirenzepine-treated animals contained more receptors for [3H]-1-QNB than either saline- or scopolamine-injected controls. Slices from the same animals also displayed a lower affinity for pirenzepine. Slices from scopolamine-injected animals revealed neither an increase in receptor number nor a decrease in antagonist affinity, although the binding of the agonist carbamylcholine was increased. Quantitative analysis of the autoradiograms generated from the slices indicated that the increase in receptor number for pirenzepine-injected animals was predominantly within the cerebral and cingulate cortices. The inhibition by pirenzepine was also lower in these areas in the same group of animals. Agonist inhibition was altered in the central layers of the cerebral cortex and in the pretectal area in scopolamine-treated animals. The results suggest separate mechanisms of drug action and adaptation for pirenzepine and scopolamine.

Animals↗

[Does aging influence effect of pirenzepine alone or combination of pirenzepine and famotidine on gastric secretion during anesthesia and surgery?].

Effect of pirenzepine alone or the combination of pirenzepine and famotidine on gastric secretion during anesthesia and surgery was evaluated in 52 elective surgical patients ranged in age from 17 to 68 years. These patients of each group were divided into two subgroups according to their age either 40 years and under or over. The patients underwent orthopedic, ophthalmic, ENT, plastic or non-abdominal general surgery under neuroleptanesthesia except 5 patients who had enflurane or isoflurane anesthesia. They received either pirenzepine 10 mg or the combination of pirenzepine 10 mg and famotidine 20 mg intravenously just before the induction of anesthesia. Volume and acidity of gastric juice were measured for 3 hours after the administration of these agents. Decrease in volume and acidity of gastric juice continued for more than 3 hours after the administration of pirenzepine alone or the combination of pirenzepine and famotidine, and it was more prominent in the combination group than in the pirenzepine group. There was no statistical difference in volume of gastric juice between the patients of 40 years and under in age and those over 40 years in each group. However, the intragastric pH tended to be lower in patients of 40 years and under in age than that in those over 40 years. A percentage of patients who had intragastric pH below 2.5 was larger in the pirenzepine administered patients of 40 years and under in age than that of the remaining patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

Selectivity of pirenzepine in the central nervous system. II. Differential effects of pirenzepine and scopolamine on performance of a representational memory task.

The behavioral effects of the two muscarinic antagonists scopolamine and pirenzepine were examined using a representational memory task for rats in a T-maze. Rats were pretrained to a criterion of 100% correct responses for daily sessions of 10 paired-run trials. The training procedures eliminated all neophobic or wary responses, and response times were invariably short (less than 3 s). Following the initial training sessions, guide cannulae were surgically implanted bilaterally over the hippocampus of each animal. Following recovery from surgery, animals were injected with saline (0.5 microliter to each hippocampus), scopolamine hydrobromide (0.5 microliter of a 60 mg/ml solution (30 micrograms) to each side), or pirenzepine (0.5 microliter of a 69.1 mg/ml solution (34.6 micrograms) to each side) according to a fixed schedule. Saline injections aimed between the blades of the dorsal dentate gyrus failed to produce any change in the performance of the memory task. Initial doses of scopolamine, applied to the same area, produced a decrease in the percentage of correct responses as did the initial dose of pirenzepine. In contrast to pirenzepine, scopolamine also produced increases in response times even to the point of defaulted trials (response times greater than 90 s) in some animals following drug injections. Saline injections failed to produce significant impairments on the days following scopolamine injections, although animals receiving pirenzepine injections were still impaired on the two days immediately following the initial pirenzepine injection. Subsequent doses of pirenzepine were ineffective in producing an impairment of performance while scopolamine injections were less effective than the initial dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Comparison of pirenzepine, ranitidine, and pirenzepine-ranitidine combination for reducing preoperative gastric fluid acidity and volume in children.

We conducted a two-part controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative oral pirenzepine (muscarinic receptor antagonist known to inhibit gastric secretion), ranitidine, and the combination pirenzepine-ranitidine in controlling gastric fluid pH and volume in 210 ASA I children, aged 2-14 yr, undergoing elective surgery. In the first part of the study (n = 90), the proportion of children considered at risk for aspiration pneumonitis was reduced with pirenzepine 25 mg (P < 0.05) but not with 12.5 mg. In the second part of the study, the other 120 children were allocated randomly to one of four groups: pirenzepine 25 mg with placebo; ranitidine 75 mg with placebo; pirenzepine 25 mg with ranitidine 75 mg; and placebo and placebo. These medications were administered 1 h before anaesthesia. After tracheal intubation, volume and pH of the gastric fluid aspiration via a multiorifice orogastric tube were measured. Pirenzepine 25 mg decreased gastric fluid volume (P < 0.05) but failed to increase gastric pH. Ranitidine 75 mg increased gastric pH (P < 0.05) but failed to decrease fluid volume. The pirenzepine-ranitidine combination reduced gastric fluid acidity and volume (P < 0.05).

Adolescent↗

Selectivity of pirenzepine in the central nervous system. I. Direct autoradiographic comparison of the regional distribution of pirenzepine and carbamylcholine binding sites.

The binding capacities of the novel antagonist pirenzepine and the agonist carbamylcholine were examined autoradiographically to compare their abilities to reduce the binding of 1-[3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]-1-QNB). This technique, which is applicable to any muscarinic ligand, permits a direct comparison between the binding of carbamylcholine and pirenzepine in the same assay. Analysis of the binding curves generated by standard scintillation counting of whole-brain slices indicated that the ligands bound heterogeneously to muscarinic receptors in the brain. Following apposition of slides to tritium-sensitive film, the binding profile for each ligand was examined visually and by microdensitometry. Regional analyses indicated that the agonist carbamylcholine displayed highest potency for thalamic nuclei, lower potency for cortical regions, and the lowest affinity for layers of the hippocampus. The M1-selective ligand pirenzepine displayed the highest potency for the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, with lower inhibition levels in the cortex, and the lowest levels of inhibition found in the thalamus. The distribution of high affinity agonist sites was found to be distinct from the distribution of high-affinity antagonist binding sites. In a separate assay, the regional inhibition of pirenzepine and scopolamine was compared for the hippocampus and the forebrain. While scopolamine did not distinguish between muscarinic receptor sites in the hippocampus and cortex, pirenzepine inhibited [3H]-1-QNB labeling in the hippocampus significantly greater than in the cerebral cortex, providing additional evidence for the hypothesis that pirenzepine is a selective antagonist.

Animals↗

[Prevention of acute stress hemorrhages of the upper gastrointestinal tract with pirenzepine and antacids. A controlled comparison between pirenzepine and cimetidine].

H2-antagonists, antacids and pirenzepine are effective drugs for prophylaxis of stress ulcer bleeding. Combined medication seems to be superior to single medication, but investigations of the effectiveness of a pirenzepine-antacid prophylaxis have not been carried out. We therefore evaluated the effect of this combination on gastric pH and on prevention of stress bleeding in ICU patients. In a prospective controlled randomized study 33 patients in each group received 50 mg. pirenzepine intravenously as a basic medication and alternatively 2000 mg. cimetidine i.v. or 2-hourly 10 ml. antacid. Gastric pH was determined three times per day. Stress bleeding was defined as bloody gastric juice, haematemesis or melaena. Two stress bleedings could be detected in each group. The pirenzepine-antacid combination proved to be superior to ensure a gastric pH of more than 3.5 than the pirenzepine-cimetidine group. After removal of the nasogastric tube the 2-hourly application of antacids proved to be impracticable.

Antacids↗

The differential loss of [3H]pirenzepine vs [3H] (-) quinuclidinylbenzilate binding to soluble rat brain muscarinic receptors indicates that pirenzepine binds to an allosteric state of the muscarinic receptor.

[3H]Pirenzepine [( 3H]PZ) and [3H] (-)Quinuclidinylbenzilate [( 3H] (-)QNB) specific binding to soluble rat brain muscarinic cholinergic receptors was assessed as a function of time subsequent to receptor solubilization. The soluble brain muscarinic receptor is stable at 4 degrees C when assayed by [3H] (-)QNB binding (t 1/2 = 80 hrs). In contrast the pirenzepine state of the receptor decays rapidly (t 1/2 = 3.0 hrs). Prior occupation of the receptor with [3H] (-)QNB or [3H]PZ increases the receptor stability by two to five fold (t 1/2 QNB greater than 1,000 hrs; t 1/2 PZ = 6.5 hrs). These data indicate that pirenzepine binds to an allosteric state of the muscarinic receptor and that caution should be employed in the assignment of receptor subtypes based solely upon the binding of ligands which recognize unique conformational states.

Allosteric Site↗

Pirenzepine selectively inhibits gastric acid secretion: a comparative pharmacological study between pirenzepine and seven other antiacetylcholine drugs.

Intravenous doses of eight antiacetylcholine drugs reduced gastric acid secretion in the rat and caused pupil dilatation in the mouse. Inhibition by these drugs of oxotremorine-induced hypothermia in mice was also assessed. The ratio, ED50 (pupil dilatation)/ED50 (gastric acid inhibition), was greater (more favourable) for pirenzepine and oxyphencyclimine than for atropine, benzhexol, glycopyrronium, isopropamide, poldine or propantheline. However, oxyphencyclimine antagonised central oxotremorine activity at all doses having more gastric inhibitory activity. Pirenzepine is a peripheral antiacetylcholine drug more selective for reducing gastric acid secretion than for increasing pupil diameter and with little central antiacetylcholine effect.

Acetylcholine↗

The effect of pirenzepine on gastric emptying and salivary flow rate: constraints on the use of saliva paracetamol concentrations for the determination of paracetamol pharmacokinetics.

1. The effects of pirenzepine on gastric emptying, salivary flow and saliva paracetamol concentrations were investigated in healthy volunteers. 2. Pirenzepine significantly reduced the area under the saliva flow-time curves (7.29 +/- 3.30 g min-1 h without pirenzepine; 4.19 +/- 2.59 g min-1 h with pirenzepine, P less than 0.01). Pirenzepine had no significant effect on plasma paracetamol Cmax (17.5 +/- 7.8 micrograms ml-1 without pirenzepine; 12.6 +/- 7.7 micrograms ml-1 with pirenzepine), plasma tmax (0.2 h (0.2-0.8 h) without pirenzepine; (0.2 h 0.2-0.8 h) with pirenzepine) and plasma AUC(0.6 h) (32.3 +/- 7.2 micrograms ml-1 h without pirenzepine; 30.3 +/- 6.5 micrograms ml-1 h with pirenzepine). 3. Mean ratios of saliva:plasma paracetamol AUC (1.06 +/- 0.24 without pirenzepine; 1.84 +/- 0.48 with pirenzepine, P less than 0.001) and saliva:plasma paracetamol Cmax (1.7 +/- 1.0 without pirenzepine; 6.5 +/- 2.7 with pirenzepine, P less than 0.01) were significantly increased by pirenzepine pretreatment, but there was a poor correlation between the percentage change in the area under the saliva flow-time curve and the percentage change in saliva paracetamol AUC (r = 0.47, P = 0.21). 4. The findings suggest that a) pirenzepine is a more selective antagonist of the muscarinic receptors in salivary glands than those in gastric smooth muscle and b) caution is required when using saliva paracetamol concentrations to determine the pharmacokinetics of the drug in the presence of other agents which may influence salivary flow rate.

Acetaminophen↗

[Corneal permeability of topically applied pirenzepine solution].

OBJECTIVE: To study the corneal permeability of three different pirenzepine eye-drop solutions and provide reference for further clinical use. METHODS: Sixty-three New Zealand white rabbits were divided into three groups. Each group of rabbits received 2% pirenzepine (pirenzepine group), 2% pirenzepine with 0.1% hyaluronic acid (hyaluronic acid group), or 2% pirenzepine with 0.1% azone (azone group). One drop eye-drops was applied to conjunctive sac every 5 min for six times. Aqueous samples were obtained from each group at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 12.0, 24.0 h after the last drop, respectively. Concentration of pirenzepine in these samples was determined by the HPLC (high pressure liquid chromatography). Stimulation symptom of rabbit eyes was also observed. RESULTS: The concentrations of pirenzepine in aqueous humor were (0.40 +/- 0.06) microg/ml at 0.5 h, (0.53 +/- 0.03) microg/ml at 1.0 h, (1.52 +/- 0.33) microg/ml at 2.0 h and (0.15 +/- 0.02) microg/ml at 4.0 h in pirenzepine group. Aqueous humor concentration of pirenzepine in both 2% pirenzepine with 0.1% azone and 2% pirenzepine with 0.1% hyaluronic acid were significantly higher than that of single pirenzepine application, and their bioavailability in the groups with combinations of pirenzepine with 0.1% azone or 0.1% hyaluronic acid were 23.0 times and 3.4 times higher than that of single pirenzepine usage. No obvious irritate symptom was found in rabbit of all three groups after eye-drop applying. CONCLUSIONS: The combination application of pirenzepine with azone or hyaluronic acid has higher corneal permeability compared with pirenzepine alone. This result indicates that azone and hyaluronic acid could be used in pirenzepine eye-drop solution to increase corneal permeability.

Animals↗

Pirenzepine affects scleral metabolic changes in myopia through a non-toxic mechanism.

Whilst the precise mechanism regulating ocular growth is unknown, it has been shown that various pharmacological agents, including the muscarinic receptor antagonists, atropine and pirenzepine, are effective at preventing the development of myopia. A recent study, which demonstrated that muscarinic antagonists reduce the synthesis of glycosaminoglycans and DNA in chick sclera in vitro, led to the suggestion that such drugs may act directly on the sclera, possibly through a toxic mechanism. Accepted markers of scleral metabolism and cell viability were used in conjunction with a non-invasive, physiological method of ocular growth regulation to determine whether the selective muscarinic antagonist pirenzepine inhibits the development of myopia via toxicity to the sclera. Chicks were monocularly deprived (MD) of pattern vision and given daily intravitreal injections of either pirenzepine (700 microg) or saline vehicle into the deprived eye over 5 days. Unoccluded animals also received intravitreal injections of either pirenzepine or saline into one eye (n=6, all groups). The contralateral eye of all animals was left untreated for comparison. Optical and ocular biometric measures were collected on the final experimental day. Following in vivo delivery of [(35)S] labelled sulphate, levels of sulphate incorporation into scleral glycosaminoglycans were measured in proteinase K digests following selective precipitation with alcian blue dye. The DNA content was also assessed through luminescence spectrometry after binding to Hoechst 33258 dye. To allow comparison with an accepted non-invasive, physiological method of ocular growth regulation, myopia was prevented in additional groups of MD animals by allowing 3hr of unoccluded vision each day, over 5 days, before levels of sulphate incorporation were measured. Scleral DNA content, a marker of cell viability, was not significantly altered between treated and control eyes in any injected group. Relative levels of sulphate incorporation (% difference between treated and contralateral control eyes) were significantly lower in the cartilaginous sclera of pirenzepine-MD animals, compared to saline-MD controls (+35.9 +/- 10.1% vs +121.2 +/- 28.6%, P<0.05), after 2hr of incorporation. However, after 6hr incorporation, there was no significant difference in sulphate incorporation in the cartilaginous sclera between the two groups (+87.2 +/- 33.1% vs +111.0 +/- 14.4%, P=0.53). No significant change was found in the levels of glycosaminoglycan synthesis in the fibrous sclera of any pirenzepine treated group, when compared to the appropriate saline control. Relative patterns of sulphate incorporation, between treatment and control groups, were essentially identical at both time points examined, regardless of whether myopia was prevented through pirenzepine injection or periods of unoccluded vision. The present study shows that, at a dose of pirenzepine sufficient to prevent experimentally-induced axial myopia, glycosaminoglycan synthesis in the cartilaginous sclera was significantly reduced for a transient period following the injection. These pirenzepine-induced reductions in glycosaminoglycan synthesis were not caused by direct drug toxicity to scleral cells as these changes were reversible and no significant reduction in DNA content was observed in pirenzepine treated eyes. Similar patterns of scleral glycosaminoglycan synthesis changes were found following the provision of brief periods of unoccluded vision further demonstrating that pirenzepine is effective in myopia prevention via a non-toxic mechanism. Consequently, the prevention of myopia development in chicks, with either pirenzepine or brief periods of unoccluded vision, is associated with the transient modulation of scleral glycosaminoglycan synthesis in the cartilaginous sclera.

Animals↗

The binding of pirenzepine to digitonin-solubilized muscarinic acetylcholine receptors from the rat myocardium.

The binding of pirenzepine to digitonin-solubilized rat myocardial muscarinic acetylcholine receptors has been examined at 4 degrees C. Solubilization produced only small changes in the binding of N-methylscopolamine and atropine. In contrast to the low affinity binding of pirenzepine found to be present in in the membranes, high affinity binding was detected in the soluble preparation. In both preparations, pirenzepine binding was complex. High affinity pirenzepine binding (KD approximately 3 X 10(-8)M) to the soluble myocardial receptors could be monitored directly using [3H]-pirenzepine. [3H]-pirenzepine-labelled soluble myocardial receptors have a sedimentation coefficient of 11.1 s. This indicates that [3H]-pirenzepine binds predominantly to the uncoupled form of the receptor. However, [3H]-pirenzepine-agonist competition experiments indicated that the high affinity pirenzepine binding sites are capable of coupling with a guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP)-binding protein. Pirenzepine affinities for the soluble myocardial receptors were unaffected by their state of association with the GTP-binding proteins found in the heart. The equilibrium binding properties of the soluble cortical and myocardial receptors were very similar. However, the binding kinetics of the myocardial receptor were much slower. It appears that the membrane environment can affect the affinity of pirenzepine for the rat myocardial muscarinic receptor. Removal of the constraint by solubilization allows the expression of high affinity pirenzepine binding.

Animals↗

Promiscuous or heterogeneous muscarinic receptors in rat atria? II. Antagonism of responses to carbachol by pirenzepine.

Carbachol produces both negative and positive inotropy in rat left atria. It is not clear whether these two effects are mediated by two separate cell surface muscarinic receptors or a single receptor interacting with two coupling proteins in the cell membrane. Pirenzepine, known to selectively block some biochemical muscarinic responses, was used in this study to block the biphasic response to carbachol in rat left atria. The negative inotropy to carbachol was blocked by pirenzepine, and Schild analysis indicated a -log dissociation constant (pKb) for the pirenzepine-receptor complex of 6.2. However, the Schild analysis may have been complicated by positive inotropy observed with pirenzepine. This positive inotropic effect was sensitive to blockade by other muscarinic antagonists. In atria from rats pretreated with pertussis toxin, carbachol produced a positive inotropic effect. Schild analysis with pirenzepine for antagonism of this response indicated a -log equilibrium dissociation constant for the pirenzepine-receptor complex of 6.7, significantly different from that for antagonism of negative inotropy. This ostensibly suggested a difference in the receptors mediating these responses. In view of the possible complicating effects of the positive inotropic effects of pirenzepine in this assay, an alternative method for the measurement of pirenzepine affinity was utilized. Resultant analysis was used to measure the pKb for pirenzepine antagonism of negative inotropy to carbachol. This method had the advantage of cancelling the positive inotropy to pirenzepine. Under these circumstances, pirenzepine had a pKb of 6.9, a value not significantly different from for antagonism of the positive inotropy to carbachol. The relevance of these findings is discussed in terms of a single promiscuous muscarinic receptor or heterogeneous receptors in this tissue. These data do not support the hypothesis that two separate receptors mediate these two effects.

Animals↗

Comparative effects of pirenzepine and cimetidine, alone and in combination, on 24-hour gastric acidity in duodenal ulcer disease.

Both pirenzepine and cimetidine have been shown to be beneficial in the healing of duodenal ulcers. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of 50 mg of pirenzepine BID and 600 mg of cimetidine BID, either alone or in combination, on 24-hour intragastric acidity, nocturnal gastric secretory volume and acid output, and serum gastrin profile in patients with duodenal ulcers. Eight asymptomatic patients with healed duodenal ulcers received placebo, pirenzepine, cimetidine, or cimetidine plus pirenzepine for one week each in a sequential order. All measurements were performed over a 24-hour period on the last day of each treatment week. Compared with pirenzepine, cimetidine was associated with lower hydrogen ion (H+) activities after breakfast, during the night, and over the 24-hour period. Pirenzepine alone failed to suppress H+, but the combination of cimetidine plus pirenzepine resulted in more prolonged acid suppression, with lower H+ after lunch, than did cimetidine alone. The effect of cimetidine on the suppression of nocturnal acid secretory volume and acid output was further enhanced by the addition of pirenzepine. The fasting serum gastrin concentrations were similar in all treatments, excluding one patient with antral G-cell hyperplasia; the postprandial gastrin responses were similarly higher with cimetidine and cimetidine plus pirenzepine than with pirenzepine. The findings suggest an added benefit of combination therapy with cimetidine and pirenzepine that may be useful in patients who fail to respond to single-agent therapy.

Adult↗

Short term pirenzepine treatment is ineffective in suppressing 24-h growth hormone secretion in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Large doses of pirenzepine given at bedtime suppress nocturnal GH secretion and abolish dawn phenomenon. As GH suppression may be beneficial in diabetic subjects we have investigated the effect of routine doses of pirenzepine on GH secretion in 9 type 1 diabetics. In the acute study pirenzepine 20 mg i.v. administered 15 min before GHRH 80 micrograms i.v. completely inhibited GHRH-induced GH response and the peak GH values were reduced from 66.3 to 9.2 ng/ml, P < 0.005. In the chronic study pirenzepine was given in a daily dose of 75 or 150 mg for 4 days and GH was measured hourly during 24-h study before and on the fourth day of pirenzepine administration. GH secretion calculated as area under curve (AUC) was not affected by pirenzepine and the values of AUC were: 139 ng/ml per h (the control 24-h study) and 123 ng/ml per h (pirenzepine 75 mg) and 303 ng/ml per h (pirenzepine 150 mg). Mean plasma glucose was not changed by pirenzepine. GH secretion calculated as AUC and mean 24-h GH level did not correlate with metabolic control of diabetes assessed by HbA1. It is concluded that routine doses of pirenzepine do not suppress GH hypersecretion in type 1 diabetic subjects and therefore this agent does not seem suitable for the purpose of 24-h GH suppression in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Adult↗

Cholinergic blockade with pirenzepine induces dose-related reduction in glucose and insulin responses to a mixed meal in normal subjects and non-insulin dependent diabetics.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the effects of cholinergic blockade with pirenzepine on glucose and insulin responses to a mixed meal in normal subjects and patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes (NIDDM). Further, to assess in normal subjects the relative importance of nocturnal GH suppression by pirenzepine. DESIGN: Placebo, 100 or 200 mg pirenzepine were given to the normal subjects 1 hour before a standard mixed meal. The effects of placebo or 200 mg pirenzepine at night on nocturnal GH secretion and subsequent breakfast carbohydrate tolerance were also studied. NIDDMs were given placebo or 200 mg pirenzepine before the meal. SUBJECTS: We studied six healthy male volunteers (ages 20-22, body mass indices 20.3-23.3) and ten NIDDMs (eight men, ages 42-74); five obese (BMI 25.5-31.8) and five non-obese (BMI 21.2-24.8). MEASUREMENTS: Serial plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were measured for 3 hours after a standard mixed meal. RESULTS: Acute pretreatment of normal male volunteers with pirenzepine produced a dose-related improvement in carbohydrate tolerance. Peak post-prandial plasma glucose levels were delayed and significantly reduced following 200 mg orally (6.5 +/- 0.1 mmol/l), but not following 100 mg (7.3 +/- 0.3), compared with placebo (7.6 +/- 0.3). Peak insulin levels were similarly delayed and reduced by the 200 mg dose only (36.5 +/- 6.1 mU/l, compared with 49.8 +/- 8.7). Suppression of nocturnal GH by 200 mg pirenzepine at night produced a small reduction in fasting plasma glucose (5.0 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, compared with 5.3 +/- 0.1, P less than 0.02) but did not improve subsequent breakfast carbohydrate tolerance. Peak plasma glucose in NIDDMs was reduced following pirenzepine (12.4 +/- 0.9 mmol/l) compared with placebo (14.3 +/- 1.0, P less than 0.01). This reduction was equally significant in obese and non-obese groups. Peak plasma insulin was also reduced by pirenzepine (22.4 +/- 3.9 mU/l) compared with placebo (42.4 +/- 5.3, P less than 0.01). Insulin suppression was quantitatively greater in obese than in non-obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in carbohydrate tolerance after pirenzepine in normal subjects is dose related and largely independent of GH suppression. Cholinergic blockade can also improve meal carbohydrate tolerance with simultaneous reduction in plasma insulin concentrations in non-insulin dependent diabetics, particularly those with obesity.

Adult↗

Effects of pirenzepine on pupil size and accommodation in rhesus monkeys.

PURPOSE: Pirenzepine is suggested to be a relatively selective muscarinic (M(1)) antagonist and is currently under investigation for the treatment of myopia. Atropine, a nonselective M-type antagonist, is used in the treatment of myopia, but has undesired ocular and systemic side effects. An M(1)-specific antagonist may decrease side effects and remain effective at reducing the progression of myopia. In the current study, the effects of pirenzepine on pupil diameter, resting refraction, and accommodation were studied in rhesus monkeys. METHODS: The time course and extent of mydriasis from subconjunctival injection of 2% pirenzepine were determined in five normal rhesus monkeys, and the effects on static and dynamic accommodation were determined in four rhesus monkeys with permanent indwelling electrodes in the Edinger-Westphal (EW) nucleus of the midbrain. Subconjunctival injections of 0.0002% to 0.2% pirenzepine in log unit dilutions were tested in three monkeys to determine the effects on static EW-stimulated accommodation. At 40 to 50 minutes after pirenzepine injection, accommodation was stimulated pharmacologically in both eyes, and the response was measured for 30 minutes. RESULTS: After 2% pirenzepine injection, pupil size increased 2.02 +/- 0.41 mm, there was a hyperopic shift in resting refraction of 1.07 +/- 0.23 D, and nearly complete cycloplegia occurred. Maximum EW-stimulated accommodation was significantly decreased 20 to 40 minutes after 0.02% or greater pirenzepine. Carbachol-stimulated accommodation was significantly decreased after 0.2% or greater pirenzepine. CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival injections of 0.02% or greater pirenzepine result in a significant decrease in accommodation and are probably acting through nonselective muscarinic antagonism. Subconjunctival injections of 0.002% or less pirenzepine do not decrease EW-stimulated accommodation.

Accommodation, Ocular↗