Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pindolol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of slow-release pindolol, standard pindolol, and propranolol in angina pectoris.

Twenty-two patients with chronic, stable, exercise-induced angina pectoris were assessed during periods of therapy with propranolol, standard-formulation pindolol, and a slow-release preparation of pindolol. Patients maintained diaries of the frequency of angina pectoris and nitroglycerin consumption and underwent treadmill exercise testing at 2 weekly intervals. No significant differences were observed in nitroglycerin consumption or anginal frequency during these 3 treatment programs. Resting heart rates were higher with pindolol than with propranolol, but no differences were noted between periods on standard and slow-release pindolol. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were similar during therapy with these 3 treatment programs. Treadmill walking time to the development of moderate angina and systolic and diastolic blood pressure was similar during treatment with propranolol, standard-formulation pindolol, and slow-release pindolol. Exercise heart rates were slightly higher during therapy with slow-release pindolol than during standard-formulation pindolol. It is concluded that propranolol, pindolol, and slow-release pindolol are equally effective in the management of patients with chronic, stable, exercise-induced angina.

Adult↗

Beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor affinity and stimulatory effects of (S)-pindolol and iodinated (S)-pindolol.

The beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor affinity and stimulatory effects of iodinated (S)-pindolol (IPIN) and (S)-pindolol were investigated in vitro using beta-adrenoceptor binding technique and isolated right atrium (rate increase, beta 1) and uterus (relaxation, beta 2) of the rat. IPIN had a higher affinity towards beta-adrenoceptors compared to (S)-pindolol, with some beta 2-adrenoceptor selectivity. In the rat uterus, IPIN produced only marginal stimulatory effects, while (S)-pindolol caused a concentration-dependent relaxation with a maximal effect that was 55% of that generated by isoprenaline. In the right atrium IPIN caused an increase in the atrial rate similar to that caused by (S)-pindolol. The concentration of IPIN required in the right atrium for a half-maximal response (pD2 = 7.81) was markedly greater than that required for occupation of half the beta-adrenoceptor population (pKB = 9.81). The beta 1-selective blocker metoprolol antagonized the effect of (S)-pindolol and IPIN on the atrial rate but a greater concentration of metoprolol (5 X 10(-6) M compared with 5 X 10(-7) M) was required to antagonize the effect of IPIN significantly. It is concluded that iodination of (S)-pindolol increased its affinity and decreased its efficacy towards beta-adrenoceptors.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Investigation of the pindolol-Fe(III) complex and its use in the spectrophotometric determination of pindolol in bulk drug and tablets.

It was found that pindolol reacts with Fe(III) chloride producing a green water soluble complex (1:1, v/v) with maximum absorbance at 635 nm. By applying the methods of Sommer and Job [Sommer et al., Folia, tomus XI, Chemia 7, 25, 1970] the conditional stability constant of the complex at pH = 1.70 +/- 0.02 was found to be log K' = 4.95 and the molar absorptivity of the complex to be 206 l mol-1 cm-1. Beer's law was obeyed up to a concentration of 220 mumol l-1 of pindolol. The recoveries were 98-101% (n = 7) and the detection limit was 5 micrograms ml-1. The described method was sufficiently simple, selective and sensitive to be suitable for the rapid and accurate determination of pindolol in tablets.

Ferric Compounds↗

[Is pindolol suitable for the therapy of glaucoma? Evaluation of the dose-effect of various concentrations of pindolol eyedrops].

Various concentrations of Pindolol eye drops (0.17%, 0.35%, 0.5%, 0.72%, 1.0%), a beta-blocking agent with an intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, were investigated with regard to their pressure-lowering effect in open-angle glaucoma. It was found that all of these concentrations reduce intraocular pressure, but that only the 1% solution has a significantly stronger effect after 24 hours. It is therefore preferable to use this relatively high concentration, especially as it is not accompanied by a bronchopulmonary risk.

Adult↗

Stimulant and blocking effects of optical isomers of pindolol on the sinoatrial node and trachea of guinea pig. Role of beta-adrenoceptor subtypes in the dissociation between blockade and stimulation.

The blocking and stimulant potencies of (-)-pindolol and (+)-pindolol were estimated on right atria and tracheae of guinea pig. Blocking affinities were estimated for beta-adrenoceptor subtypes by using several agonists. Binding affinities of (-)-pindolol and (+)-pindolol were also estimated for beta-adrenoceptors labelled with 3H-(-)-bupranolol in membranes of ventricular myocardium and lung of guinea pig. Both (-)-pindolol and (+)-pindolol caused tracheal relaxation with intrinsic activities of 0.3. The concentration-effect curve for (-)-pindolol exhibits a high-sensitivity and a low-sensitivity relaxant component; the curve for (+)-pindolol was nearly monophasic. The EC50's were (-log mol/l) 9.2 and 6.1 for (-)-pindolol and 7.6 for (+)-pindolol. Using subtype-selective blockers it was found that the relaxant effects of (+)-pindolol and those of the high-sensitivity component of (-)-pindolol are mediated through beta 2-adrenoceptors. The low-sensitivity component of relaxation of (-)-pindolol was antagonized by beta-blockers less than expected from their affinities for beta-adrenoceptors. Both (-)-pindolol and (+)-pindolol caused an increase of atrial beating rate with an intrinsic activity of 0.2. The concentration-effect curve of (-)-pindolol was biphasic; the curve of (+)-pindolol was monophasic. The EC50's were (-log mol/l) 9.1 and 7.0 for (-)-pindolol and 7.5 for (+)-pindolol. From the use of subtype-selective antagonists we conclude that the positive chronotropic effects of (+)-pindolol are mediated predominantly by beta 2-adrenoceptors. On the other hand, the high-sensitivity component of the positive chronotropic effects of (-)-pindolol appears to be mediated predominantly through beta 1-adrenoceptors, although beta 2-adrenoceptors may also participate. The low-sensitivity component of the positive chronotropic effects of (-)-pindolol is resistant to blockade by subtype-selective antagonists at concentrations causing at least 98% beta-adrenoceptor occupancy. Only high but non-depressant concentrations of non-selective (-)-bupranolol antagonized the low-sensitivity component of (-)-pindolol. (-)-Pindolol antagonized the effects of several agonists to similar extent in both trachea and right atrium. (+)-Pindolol was less potent as antagonist of the relaxant effects of (-)-noradrenaline on trachea than against those of (-)-adrenaline, (-)-isoprenaline and (+/-)-salbutamol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

[Interest of the use of pindolol in the treatment of depression: review].

The principal stakes of depression treatment are to accelerate and enhance the clinical effects of antidepressant drug. The onset of antidepressant action of Serotonin (5HT) selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) was attributed in part to the decrease in firing activity of serotonin neurons produced by the activation of raphe 5HT1A autoreceptors at the time of treatment initiation. Pindolol, an antagonist at somatodendritic pre-synaptic 5HT1A receptors has been investigated as a potential accelerator or potentialisator of antidepressant response. Six open label studies and 12 controlled studies were identified for revue. The first open-label pilot study was conducted by Artigas et al. They showed promising results with pindolol, both in the acceleration of antidepressant response and in improving the efficacy of antidepressant. On the basis of these results five open-label studies were conducted. The open label studies suggest that pindolol accelerate the antidepressant response of serotoninergics therapeutics. The augmentation of antidepressant response was not clearly demonstrated by these studies particularly in the treatment of refractory depression. For example, Dinan et Scott that found the addition of pindolol in association with SSRI therapy had a poor efficacy. In the twelve controlled studies, 4 tried to underscore the shortening of the onset and the augmentation of efficacy of SSRI by pindolol [Berman et al., Maes et al., Perez et al., Tome et al. ], 3 tried to underscore shortening of the onset [Bordet, Zanardi ] and 3 tried to underscore the augmentation of efficacy [Maes et al., Moreno et al., Perez et al. ]. One study tried to underscore the augmentation of efficacy of sleep deprivation by pindolol and another one the shortening of the onset of ECT. Six studies included depressive resistant patients. Three studies were carried out with fluoxetine, 1 with fluvoxamine, 3 with paroxetine, 1 with trazodone. Two -studies were investigated with several antidepressant treatments. The results of the studies indicate one acceleration of antidepressant response in 6 studies, one augmentation of efficacy in 5 studies. Two studies clearly demonstrate that pindolol may -augment and accelerate antidepressant response. Three studies did not confirm these observations. Several points can be examined. For pindolol: 3 authors have demonstrated that the effect of pindolol did not rely upon small antidepressant effect mediated by b-blockers properties, because anxiety was not predominantly improved by pindolol plus SSRI while depressive symptoms were clearly improved. On the basis of data issues from recent positron emission tomography (PET) studies, several authors suggested that the dose of pindolol used in most clinical trials (3 yen 2,5 mg day-1) might be insufficient to induce a substantial occupancy of 5-HTA receptors (Rabiner et al. It is possible that higher doses will show a more evident benefit. On the whole, pindolol seemed to be well tolerated. Adverse effects most commonly reported were increased irritability, insomnia and nausea. Pindolol had poor adverse effects in cardiovascular functions. The variation of the results of the controlled studies can be explained by different points: Firstly by difficulty to determine good criterion of resistance. The most simplistic definition of treatment resistance is the failure to achieve and sustain euthymia with adequate antidepressant treatment. Secondly by the fact that depressive patients who present antecedents of depressive illness seem to be worst responders to the association pindolol/serotoninergic antidepressant than patients suffering of first episode of depression. We observed one antecedent of depression in the group of resistant patients who were good responders to the association pindolol/antidepressant therapy. We observed three anterior episodes of depression in negatives studies of the association pindolol/antidepressant therapy. Thirdly by the fact that the failure of the antidepressant treatment at the time of earlier (or actual) episode seems to be a criterion for less responsiveness to the association of this antidepressant treatment with pindolol. In fact, the open label studies who demonstrated efficacy of the association between pindolol and serotoninergic therapy in major resistant depression were realized with new antidepressant molecule for the episode. Other controlled trials could confirm these facts. Most of the studies failed to retrace clearly the historicity of depression, and it may be interesting in future investigations to analyze the response of the association -compared to the status of the patient with the antidepressant therapy. Further perspective could be envisaged especially in the utilization of pindolol for the treatment of pathologies which are usually treated with a serotoninergic antidepressant -therapy. For example, the antagonist 5HT(1A) Way 100635 was experimented with success in animals in order to augment the efficacy of clomipramine in the treatment of chronic pain. In other respects several psychopharmacogenetics studies could be investigated to examine, for instance, the role of the 5-HT transporter and its implication in the response to pindolol and antidepressant association. In summary, pindolol accele-rates, and in some cases enhances the clinical action of antidepressant drugs. It appears that this augmentation strategy has more limited effect on treatment resistant patient but there is experimental evidence for using higher doses in future augmentation trial.

Major Depressive Disorder↗

Intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of (-)-pindolol mediated through a (-)-propranolol-resistant site of the beta1-adrenoceptor in human atrium and recombinant receptors.

The beta-blocker (-)-pindolol produces intrinsic sympathomimetic activity manifested clinically by cardiostimulation, but the beta-adrenoceptor subtype, which mediates these effects, is unknown. Recent work indicates the existence of a (-)-propranolol-resistant site of the cardiac beta(1)-adrenoceptor and we propose that it mediates the cardiostimulation evoked by (-)-pindolol. We compared the interaction of (-)-pindolol both with human atrial myocardium and with recombinant beta(1)-adrenoceptors. The effects of (-)-pindolol on paced human atrial trabeculae were studied in the presence of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX; 20 microM). (-)-Pindolol caused small negative and positive inotropic effects at nanomolar and micromolar concentrations respectively, which were unaffected by N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA, 10 microM), inconsistent with an involvement of nitric oxide. (-)-Pindolol, in the presence of (-)-propranolol, increased atrial contractile force and cAMP through recombinant beta(1)-adrenoceptors with identical potency (-logEC(50)M=6.5). The positive inotropic effects of (-)-pindolol were resistant to blockade by L-748,337 (100 nM), a beta(3)-adrenoceptor antagonist. (-)-CGP12177, known to act through the (-)-propranolol-resistant site of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor, also increased with similar potency atrial contractile force (-logEC(50)M=7.6) and cAMP at recombinant beta(1)-adrenoceptors (-logEC(50)M=7.7). (-)-Pindolol blocked the effects of (-)-CGP12177 in human atrium and recombinant beta(1)-adrenoceptors with similar equilibrium dissociation constants (pK(B)=6.5 and 6.3). Thus, stimulant potency and blocking potency of (-)-pindolol against (-)-CGP12177 agree. In contrast, (-)-pindolol was 200-400 times more effective at blocking the effects of a catecholamine than the effects of (-)-CGP12177 in both human atrium (pK(B)=9.1) and at recombinant beta(1)-adrenoceptors (pK(B)=8.6). We conclude that the cardiostimulant effects of (-)-pindolol in human atrial myocardium are mediated through a (-)-propranolol-resistant site of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor with low affinity for (-)-pindolol. In contrast, (-)-pindolol blocks the effects of catecholamines through a high-affinity site of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor. beta(3)-Adrenoceptors are not involved in the atrial effects of (-)-pindolol.

1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine↗

Stereoselective renal clearance of pindolol in humans.

In this study, pindolol, a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent marketed as a racemic mixture, was used as a model compound to investigate stereoselective renal clearance of organic cations in human beings. Six normal subjects received an oral dose of 20 mg racemic pindolol. Heart rate and blood pressure were measured throughout the study. A stereospecific high performance liquid chromatographic procedure was used to quantitate the concentrations of d- and l-pindolol in plasma and urine. Renal clearance and other pharmacokinetic parameters of both enantiomers were calculated and compared. The renal clearance of l-pindolol was greater than that of d-pindolol in all subjects. The renal clearance (mean +/- SD) was 240 +/- 55 ml/min for l-pindolol and 200 +/- 51 ml/min for d-pindolol (P less than 0.01). Since stereoselective binding to plasma proteins was not observed, differences in renal clearance between d- and l-pindolol were caused by either stereoselective renal transport, or stereoselective renal metabolism. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve, the amount of drug excreted, and the half-life of l-pindolol were greater than those of d-pindolol, which suggests that pindolol was also eliminated stereoselectively by nonrenal routes. The slopes of the resting heart rate vs. the plasma concentration of l-pindolol were significantly less than zero and were significantly correlated to the pretreatment heart rate, which supports the hypothesis that intrinsic sympathetic tone largely determines the effect of pindolol on the resting heart rate. The observation that pindolol is eliminated stereoselectively by the kidney may have clinical implications for other racemic drugs that are renally eliminated.

Adult↗

Studies on the cardiovascular effects of pindolol in DOCA/saline hypertensive rats.

1 A hypotensive response to orally administered pindolol in conscious normotensive and deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)/saline hypertensive rats (DS-rats) is described. In DS-rats, pindolol (10-50 mug/kg) produced a dose-dependent fall in blood pressure and elevation of resting heart rate.2 The hypotensive response and tachycardia produced by oral pindolol (50 mug/kg) in DS-rats were prevented by propranolol (5 mg/kg), suggesting that pindolol's effects are mediated by beta-adrenoceptor stimulation.3 After mecamylamine (10 mg/kg), oral pindolol (50 mug/kg) produced a further fall in blood pressure in DS-rats, suggesting that its hypotensive effects are probably mediated in the peripheral vasculature.4 Pretreatment with oral pindolol (10 or 50 mug/kg) resulted in a reduction of neuronally-induced tachycardia in pithed DS-rats; neuronally-evoked pressor effects were also antagonized by pindolol (50 mug/kg, orally).5 Whereas pindolol, 50 mug/kg orally or intraperitoneally, produced a marked and progressive hypotensive response of rapid onset (20 min) in DS-rats the same dose intravenously produced a smaller response of delayed onset (80 minutes).6 In anaesthetized DS-rats, an equivalent degree of cardiac beta-adrenoceptor blockade was produced by pretreatment with pindolol, 50 mug/kg orally (2 h previously) or intravenously (1 h previously).7 After administration of pindolol, 2 mg/kg intravenously, to conscious DS-rats, the tachycardia produced by intravenous isoprenaline, 3 mug/kg, was almost abolished for the first 60 min of the study, whereas a hypotensive response to pindolol was delayed in onset (100 minutes).8 The hypotensive response and tachycardia produced by oral pindolol 50 mug/kg, in DS-rats were prevented by inhibition of metabolic enzyme activity by pretreatment with Proadifen (SKF 525-A), 80 mg/kg.9 The results suggest that pindolol's effects on blood pressure and heart rate in the conscious DS-rat are mediated by a metabolite(s) acting by stimulation of peripheral beta-adrenoceptors.

Administration, Oral↗

Mode of action of (-)-pindolol on feline and human myocardium.

(-)-Pindolol antagonized competitively and to a similar extent the positive inotropic effects of both (-)-noradrenaline and (-)-adrenaline in human ventricular preparations. An equilibrium dissociation constant KD (-log mol 1(-1) = pKD) of 9.2-9.3 was estimated regardless of disease present or agonist used. (-)-Pindolol antagonized competitively the positive inotropic effects of (-)-adrenaline more than those of (-)-noradrenaline in human atrial preparations. pKD values of (-)-pindolol were 9.6 against (-)-adrenaline and 9.1 against (-)-noradrenaline. The results are consistent with a moderate selectivity of (-)-pindolol for beta 2-compared to beta 1-adrenoceptors in human atrium. (-)-Pindolol competed with [3H]-(-)-bupranolol with a pKD of 9.4 for beta-adrenoceptors of human ventricle. Positive inotropic effects of (-)-pindolol were not detected on human atrium or ventricle in a concentration range of 1-1000 nmol 1(-1). The affinity of (-)-pindolol estimated for human myocardial beta-adrenoceptors, its moderate beta 2-selectivity and its lack of intrinsic activity for contractile force agreed with similar characteristics in other species. (-)-Pindolol caused marked positive chronotropic effects in kitten right atria with an intrinsic activity of 0.5 with respect to catecholamines. On kitten left atria it caused only weak positive inotropic effects with an intrinsic activity of 0.1. (-)-Pindolol (0.6-6000 nmol-1) did not cause positive inotropic effects in kitten papillary muscle. The concentration-effect curve for (-)-pindolol on kitten right and left atria was biphasic. Its positive chronotropic and inotropic effects were not blocked by methysergide, suggesting that 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)-receptors were not involved. Low concentrations of antagonists selective for beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors blocked the high sensitivity component but not the low sensitivity component of the positive chronotropic and inotropic effects. The biphasic nature of the positive chronotropic effects of (-)-pindolol in kitten agreed with previous observations made on guinea-pig right atria and support the concept that 3 receptors in the sinoatrial pacemaker contribute to these chronotropic effects: beta 1, beta 2 and a low-affinity receptor for (-)-pindolol which is neither beta 1 nor beta 2. The partial agonistic activity of (-)-pindolol in the heart appears to be mainly (kitten) or completely (man) restricted to the sinoatrial pacemaker.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Randomized double-blind study of pindolol in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Twelve patients with documented coronary arteriosclerosis and severe stable angina pectoris were treated with the beta blocker pindolol, 5 mg four times a day, utilizing a double-blind crossover protocol. Following 4 weeks of baseline observation with no active treatment, pindolol and placebo were given for 4 weeks each. End points evaluated were episodes of angina pectoris/week, number of nitroglycerin tablets used per week, time on treadmill test until onset of angina pectoris, double product of heart rate and blood pressure at onset of angina pectoris, and amount of ST depression during the treadmill exercise test. Episodes of angina pectoris and nitroglycerin consumption were reduced by 18% on placebo and 32% on pindolol (not significant). All of the improvement occurred in the third and fourth weeks of pindolol treatment. Less difference between pindolol and placebo was noted when the placebo period came after the pindolol period, suggesting a carry-over effect of pindolol. With pindolol, treatment exercise tolerance was increased 13% (33 seconds) over baseline levels but only 2% over the levels achieved with placebo treatment (not significant). ST depression with exercise was 6% less when patients were on pindolol than when they were on placebo (not significant). There was a marked decrease in myocardial oxygen demand as measured by the double product of blood pressure and pulse during exercise (23% reduction when on pindolol and no change when on placebo, p less than 0.01). This study shows that there was an important placebo effect when treatment of angina pectoris was evaluated and that pindolol significantly reduced myocardial oxygen demand but evidence of ischemia was not significantly reduced. Possible mechanisms to explain the disparity between reduction in estimated myocardial oxygen demand (double product) and objective improvement in ischemia include coronary spasm and altered regional flow resulting from beta blockade. Alternative explanations may be the relatively small fixed dose of pindolol and the small number of patients studied.

Adult↗

Is the beneficial antidepressant effect of coadministration of pindolol really due to somatodendritic autoreceptor antagonism?

BACKGROUND: We investigated the combination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) with the beta-adrenoceptor/serotonin 1A (5-HT(1A)) antagonist pindolol, based on the concept that 5-HT(1A) receptor blockade would eliminate the need for desensitization of presynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors and therefore hasten the onset of action and improve the efficacy of SSRIs. However, since pindolol plasma levels after 2.5 mg three times a day are about 60 nmol/L, and the K(i) for the 5-HT(1A) receptor is 30 nmol/L, it is questionable whether pindolol levels in the brain would be sufficient to antagonize 5-HT(1A) receptors. Using microdialysis in the guinea pig, we correlated brain and plasma levels of pindolol with its capability of augmenting paroxetine-induced increases in brain 5-HT levels. In addition, central beta-receptor antagonism of pindolol was studied by investigating blockade of beta-agonist-induced increases in brain cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) formation. METHODS: Using microdialysis and jugular vein catheterization, we studied the ability of systemically administered pindolol to antagonize central 5-HT(1A) and beta-adrenoceptors, while simultaneously monitoring pindolol plasma and brain concentrations. RESULTS: Augmentation of paroxetine-induced increases in extracellular 5-HT levels in the ventral hippocampus was only observed at steady state plasma levels exceeding 7000 nmol/L (concurrent brain levels 600 nmol/L). In contrast, antagonism of beta-agonist-induced increases of brain cAMP levels was already observed at pindolol plasma levels of 70 nmol/L (concurrent brain levels < 3 nmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: At plasma levels that are observed in patients after 2.5 mg three times a day ( approximately 60 nmol/L), pindolol produces only a partial blockade of presynaptic 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors and does not augment the SSRI-induced 5-HT increase in the guinea pig brain. It is therefore very unlikely that the favorable effects of combining pindolol with SSRIs, as reported in a number of clinical studies, are due to 5-HT(1A) antagonism. Since pindolol completely blocks central beta-adrenoreceptors at clinically relevant plasma levels, it is possible that beta-adrenoceptor antagonism is involved in mediating pindolol's beneficial effects.

Animals↗

Antagonist properties of (-)-pindolol and WAY 100635 at somatodendritic and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors in the rat brain.

1. The aim of the present work was to characterize the 5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5-HT1A) antagonistic actions of (-)-pindolol and WAY 100635 (N-(2-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethyl)-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexane carboxamide). Studies were performed on 5-HT1A receptors located on 5-hydroxytryptaminergic neurones in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) and on pyramidal cells in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus in rat brain slices. 2. Intracellular electrophysiological recording of CA1 pyramidal cells and 5-hydroxytryptaminergic DRN neurones showed that the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) evoked in both cell types a concentration-dependent cell membrane hyperpolarization and a decrease in cell input resistance. On its own, (-)-pindolol did not modify the cell membrane potential and resistance at concentrations up to 10 microM, but it antagonized the 5-CT effects in a concentration-dependent manner. Similar antagonism of 5-CT effects was observed in the CA3 hippocampal region. (-)-Pindolol also prevented the 5-HT1A receptor-mediated hyperpolarization of CA1 pyramidal cells due to 5-HT (15 microM). In contrast, the 5-HT-induced depolarization mediated by presumed 5-HT4 receptors persisted in the presence of 3 microM (-)-pindolol. 3. In the hippocampus, (-)-pindolol completely prevented the hyperpolarization of CA1 pyramidal cells by 100 nM 5-CT (IC50=92 nM; apparent KB=20.1 nM), and of CA3 neurones by 300 nM 5-CT (IC50=522 nM; apparent KB= 115.1 nM). The block by (-)-pindolol was surmounted by increasing the concentration of 5-CT, indicating a reversible and competitive antagonistic action. 4. Extracellular recording of the firing rate of 5-hydroxytryptaminergic neurones in the DRN showed that (-)-pindolol blocked, in a concentration-dependent manner, the decrease in firing elicited by 100 nM 5-CT (IC50=598 nM; apparent KB= 131.7 nM) or 100 nM ipsapirone (IC50= 132.5 nM; apparent KB= 124.9 nM). The effect of (-)-pindolol was surmountable by increasing the concentration of the agonist. Intracellular recording experiments showed that 10 microM (-)-pindolol were required to antagonize completely the hyperpolarizing effect of 100 nM 5-CT. 5. In vivo labelling of brain 5-HT1A receptors by i.v. administration of [3H]-WAY 100635 ([O-methyl-3H]-N-(2-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1 -piperazinyl)ethyl-N-(2-pyridyl)cyclo-hexane-carboxamide) was used to assess their occupancy following in vivo treatment with (-)-pindolol. (-)-Pindolol (15 mg kg[-1]) injected i.p. either subchronically (2 day-treatment before i.v. injection of [3H]-WAY 100635) or acutely (20 min before i.v. injection of [3H]-WAY 100635) markedly reduced [3H]-WAY 100635 accumulation in all 5-HT1A receptor-containing brain areas. In particular, no differences were observed in the capacity of (-)-pindolol to prevent [3H]-WAY 100635 accumulation in the DRN and the CAI and CA3 hippocampal areas. 6. Intracellular electrophysiological recording of 5-hydroxytryptaminergic DRN neurones showed that WAY 100635 prevented the hyperpolarizing effect of 100 nM 5-CT in a concentration-dependent manner (IC50=4.9 nM, apparent KB=0.25 nM). In CA1 pyramidal cells, hyperpolarization induced by 50 nM 5-CT was also antagonized by WAY 100635 (IC50 = 0.80 nM, apparent KB= 0.28 nM).

Animals↗

Irreversible blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors with a bromoacetyl derivative of pindolol.

A potent irreversible beta-adrenergic derivative of pindolol possessing a chemically reactive group (Br-AAM-pindolol) was synthesized. This compound devoid of agonist properties, competed for all (3H)-dihydroalprenolol (3H-DHA) binding sites in C6 glioma cell and rat cerebellum membranes. Pretreatment of C6 glioma cell membranes with Br-AAM-pindolol and subsequent washing resulted in a time- and dose-dependent blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors. A 50% blockade was achieved in the presence of 1.6 nM Br-AAM-pindolol. This blockade occurs specifically at the beta-adrenergic receptor level, as: 1) it induced a decrease of maximal isoproterenol stimulated adenylate cyclase activity with no modification of basal and sodium fluoride stimulated activity and 2) decreases of (3H)-DHA binding and stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity by the agonist were suppressed in the presence of isoproterenol, a beta-adrenergic agonist. Furthermore, Br-AAM-pindolol treatment did not affect (3H)-diazepam binding in C6 glioma cell membranes. Pretreatment of C6 glioma cells with Br-AAM-pindolol also reduced the response of adenylate cyclase to isoproterenol and the number of beta-adrenergic receptors. The blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors of C6 glioma cells by Br-AAM-pindolol was non-competitive, whereas the blockade obtained with AM-pindolol, a derivative of pindolol devoid of alkylating properties, was competitive. The irreversible blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors by Br-AAM-pindolol in rat erythrocyte membranes was substantiated by the demonstration that no recovery of beta-adrenergic receptors occurred during long term incubation of the membranes (48 h) following Br-AAM-pindolol treatment and subsequent washing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adenylyl Cyclases↗