Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Peroxisome Proliferators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of dexamethasone on ciprofibrate-induced cell proliferation and peroxisome proliferation.

Peroxisome proliferators cause liver cell proliferation in addition to other pleiotropic effects such as peroxisome proliferation and induction of certain peroxisomal and cytosolic enzymes in liver. Since dexamethasone has been shown to inhibit mitogen-induced liver cell hyperplasia, we examined whether dexamethasone inhibits only cell proliferation without affecting peroxisome proliferation induced by peroxisome proliferators such as ciprofibrate. Livers of rats fed a diet containing ciprofibrate (0.025%) with or without added dexamethasone (0.5 mg or 1 mg/kg diet) for 1 week were evaluated for hepatocyte proliferation and peroxisome proliferation. Dexamethasone administration resulted in abrogation of ciprofibrate-induced cell proliferation as shown by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling and mitoses counts. The hepatocyte proliferative index measured after administration of a single dose of BrdU was 18.3 +/- 1.1 and 2.3 +/- 0.7% (p < 0.01) in ciprofibrate and ciprofibrate + dexamethasone treated rats, respectively. With multiple injections of BrdU (daily injections for 7 days) the proliferative index was 225 +/- 10 and 183 +/- 2% (p < 0.02), respectively, in these two groups. Interestingly, whereas the levels of peroxisome proliferator-induced Mr 80,000 polypeptide and catalase and peroxisomal bifunctional enzyme, and the corresponding mRNAs and peroxisome volume density were unaffected. These results show that dexamethasone selectively inhibits only cell proliferation without inhibiting the peroxisome proliferation caused by ciprofibrate. This model should be useful for examining the role of cell proliferation versus oxidative stress in peroxisome proliferator-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.

Administration, Oral↗

Peroxisome proliferators and peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) as regulators of lipid metabolism.

Peroxisome proliferation (PP) in mammalian cells, first described 30 years ago, represents a fascinating field of modern research. Major improvements made in its understanding were obtained through basic advances that have opened up new areas in cell biology, biochemistry and genetics. A decade after the first report on PP, a new metabolic pathway (peroxisomal beta-oxidation) and its inducibility by peroxisome proliferators were discovered. More recently, a new type of nuclear receptor, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), has been described. The first PPAR was discovered in 1990. Since then, many other PPARs have been characterized. This original class of nuclear receptors belongs to the superfamily of steroid receptors. With activation of cell signal transduction pathways, the occurrence of PPARs provides, for the first time, a coherent explanation of mechanisms by which PP is triggered. Nevertheless, although many compounds or metabolites are capable of activating PPARs, the natural direct ligands of these receptors have not been, up to now, clearly identified, with, however, the exception of 15-deoxy-12,14-prostaglandin J2 which is the ligand of PPAR gamma 2 while leukotrien LTB4 binds PPAR alpha. At this stage, the hypothesis of some orphan PPARs (ie receptors without known ligand) can not be ruled out. Despite these relatively restrictive aspects, the mechanisms by which activation of PPARs leads to PP become clear; also, coherent hypotheses among which a scenario involving receptor phosphorylation or a heat shock protein (ie HSP 72) can be proposed to explain how PPARs would be activated. The aim of this note is to review recent developments on PPARs, to present members up to now recognized to belong to the PPAR family, their characterization, functions, regulation and mechanisms of activation as well as their involvement in lipid metabolism regulation such as control of beta-oxidation, ketogenesis, fatty acid synthesis and lipoprotein metabolism. As an introducing section, a brief review of the major events between the first report of PP in mammals and the discovery of the first PPAR is given. Another section is devoted to current hypotheses on mechanisms responsible for PPAR activation and PP induction. Rather than an exhaustive presentation of cellular alterations accompanying PP induction, a dynamic overview of the lipid metabolism is provided. By assessing the biological significance of this organellar proliferative process, the reader will be led to conclude that the discovery of PPARs and related gene activation through peroxisome proliferator responsive element (PPRE) makes PP induction one of the most illustrative examples of control that occurs in lipid metabolism.

Acyl-CoA Oxidase↗

Novel role of oxidants in the molecular mechanism of action of peroxisome proliferators.

Peroxisome proliferators are nongenotoxic rodent carcinogens that act as tumor promoters by increasing cell proliferation; however, their precise mechanism of action is not well understood. Oxidative DNA damage caused by leakage of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) from peroxisomes was hypothesized initially as the mechanism by which these compounds cause liver tumors. It seems unlikely that oxidants of peroxisomal origin explain the mechanism of action of peroxisome proliferators because treatment with these compounds in vivo does not lead to increased H2O2 production. On the other hand, Kupffer cell-derived oxidants, such as superoxide, may play a role in initiating tumor nerosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) production that leads to hepatocyte proliferation. Peroxisome proliferators have been shown to activate Kupffer cells both in vitro and in vivo, and the use of Kupffer cell inhibitors such as methyl palmitate and dietary glycine have demonstrated that Kupffer cells are responsible for hepatocyte proliferation by mechanisms involve TNF-alpha. Moreover, peroxisome proliferators activate the transcription factor NF-kappaB, one of the major regulators of TNF-alpha expression, in Kupffer cells. Importantly, activation of NF-kappaB by peroxisome proliferators was shown to be oxidant-dependent, leading to the hypothesis that oxidants of Kupffer cell origin are involved in the mechanism of action. Many of the effects of peroxisome proliferators, including peroxisome induction and hepatomegaly, involve the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha). Recently, it was shown that peroxisome proliferator-induced cell proliferation and tumors require the PPARalpha. However, PPARalpha is not involved in TNF-alpha production by Kupffer cells because it is not expressed in this cell type. How it is involved in liver tumor remains unclear and one possible explanation is that both Kupffer cell TNF-alpha and parenchymal cell PPARalpha are required. Collectively, recent data are consistent with the hypothesis that oxidants play a role in signaling hepatocellular proliferation due to peroxisome proliferators via activation of NF-kappaB and incrase in mitogenic cytokines such as TNF-alpha.

Animals↗

Cell cross-talk mediates PPARalpha null hepatocyte proliferation after peroxisome proliferator exposure.

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor(alpha) (PPARalpha) mediates the liver's responses to peroxisome proliferator compounds. These responses include induction of specific hepatic enzymes, peroxisome proliferation and hepatocyte proliferation. PPARalpha null mice, which lack receptor in all cells of the body, do not respond to peroxisome proliferators, indicating that hepatocellular proliferation and other responses require the presence of this receptor in at least some cells. To determine if PPARalpha is required specifically in hepatocytes for each response, we used hepatocyte transplantation to generate chimeric livers composed of PPARalpha null and positive hepatocytes in PPARalpha null or positive hosts. Upon exposure to a peroxisome proliferator, peroxisome proliferation and enzyme induction were restricted to receptor positive hepatocytes, indicating that these responses are cell autonomous with respect to hepatocyte receptor status. However, both PPARalpha null and positive hepatocytes in chimeric livers displayed elevated DNA synthesis regardless of host receptor status, as long as at least some hepatocytes contained receptor. These findings indicate that the mitogenic response to peroxisome proliferators does not require PPARalpha in all hepatocytes.

Animals↗

Genotoxic effects of selected peroxisome proliferators.

Peroxisome proliferators, a class of structurally dissimilar chemicals including hypolipidemic drugs and industrial plasticizers, have been shown to be associated with hepatocarcinogenesis although an initiating effect could not yet be demonstrated in the cell systems utilized. For this reason the genotoxic potential of the peroxisome proliferators nafenopin, ciprofibrate and di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate (DEHA) was determined in primary cultures of adult rat hepatocytes. To further test if these compounds are genotoxic per se or the genotoxic effect is due to peroxisome proliferation, the cultures were exposed for 3 and 51 h. Treatment for 3 h with the hypolipidemic drugs nafenopin and ciprofibrate induced statistically significant increases of SCE at concentrations > or = 30 and 100 microM respectively. At higher concentrations statistically significant increases of chromosomal aberrations (nafenopin: 100 microM; ciprofibrate: > or = 100 microM) and micronuclei (ciprofibrate: > or = 250 microM) were also found. The presence of peroxisome proliferators in the media until harvesting (51 h) did not significantly alter the dose response of SCE, micronuclei and chromosomal aberration induction by ciprofibrate, while long-term exposure to nafenopin resulted in statistically significant increases of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei at concentrations > or = 30 microM. The differences were statistically significant at 30 and 100 microM for micronuclei, and at 30 microM for chromosomal aberrations. Neither short- nor long-term exposure to DEHA produced a significant genotoxic effect up to 200 microM. The peroxisome proliferators tested were not cytotoxic at any concentration, as determined by mitotic index. These results clearly demonstrate that the peroxisome proliferators nafenopin and ciprofibrate can cause genotoxic effects in primary cultures of adult rat hepatocytes. The comparison of short- and long-term exposure does not suggest a strong correlation between the induction of peroxisome proliferation and genotoxicity, since long-term exposure did not significantly alter the dose response and--except for nafenopin--the extent of the genotoxic effects.

Adipates↗

Species differences in the clonal expansion of hepatocytes in response to the coaction of epidermal growth factor and nafenopin, a rodent hepatocarcinogenic peroxisome proliferator.

Peroxisome proliferators are members of the nongenotoxic family of rodent hepatocarcinogens. There exist substantial species differences in response to peroxisome proliferators among mammalian species. We have reported previously that peroxisome proliferators can synergize with epidermal growth factor (EGF) to promote the clonal expansion of rat hepatocytes associated with the early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis. The aim of the present study was to determine whether responsiveness in this in vitro assay reflected the known species differences in response to peroxisome proliferators. The process of tumorigenicity was modeled in the soft agar cloning assay since growth in soft agar is thought to reflect the early stages of tumorigenesis. This is because clonal expansion under these conditions requires the cells to survive, to undergo mitosis, and to escape from the contact-dependent growth associated with normal cell behavior. The data presented here show that mouse hepatocytes are able to undergo clonal expansion in soft agar in response to nafenopin and EGF giving a three- to fourfold increase in colony numbers over control. This result is comparable to the fivefold increase in rat hepatocyte colony numbers that we have reported previously. In contrast, hamster, guinea pig, and human hepatocytes did not respond to the concerted action of EGF and nafenopin despite their ability to respond to EGF as a mitogen in monolayer culture. These data demonstrate that the clonal expansion of rodent hepatocytes in soft agar in response to peroxisome proliferators and EGF displays the same species differences as other pleiotropic responses to these compounds and is likely therefore to be relevant to the process of hepatocarcinogenesis.

Animals↗

Role of thyroid hormones in hepatic effects of peroxisome proliferators.

Peroxisome proliferators are endocrine disrupting chemicals that cause liver tumors in rodents but not humans. Although the receptor that mediates key hepatic effects, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-alpha), and its endogenous ligands have been identified, the mechanism whereby these commonly used chemicals cause liver tumors in rodents has yet to be elucidated. Species differences in PPAR-alpha and DNA response elements may explain some of the variability in response upon exposure to peroxisome proliferators. The possibility that thyroid-modulating effects of peroxisome proliferators may contribute to the hepatic effects of peroxisome proliferators has yet to be fully explored. When the potent peroxisome proliferator, WY-14,643, was given to hypothyroid rats, there was a blunting of the hepatomegaly and hepatocyte proliferative responses seen in thyroid-intact animals. Acyl-CoA oxidase activity was unaltered by changes in thyroid hormone status. In addition, preliminary evidence indicates that peroxisome proliferators increased hepatic thyroid receptor (TRalpha1) expression, but TRalpha1 levels in liver tumors were similar to those in unexposed animals. Significant differences between humans and rodents with respect to thyroid hormone physiology and metabolism, in conjunction with the results of these studies, may be indicative of yet another mechanism to explain differential sensitivity to hepatic effects of peroxisome proliferators.

Animals↗

Toxicity of peroxisome proliferators.

Peroxisome proliferators are not a chemical class of compounds. They do not have a similar chemical structure but all induce characteristic effects in the liver of treated rats or mice. They produce within a few days a striking dose-dependent hepatomegaly accompanied by a characteristic proliferation of the peroxisomal and microsomal compartment as assessed morphologically and biochemically. Such effects are not observed in other species including human. In addition, life-long feeding of the susceptible laboratory animals results in the formation of liver tumor. The effects induced in subchronic studies can be reproduced and investigated in cultured hepatocytes, the target cells. The species specificity is observed with all peroxisome proliferators, and by large the effects observed in subchronic studies are reversible. The hepatocarcinogenesis by peroxisome proliferators is not fully understood, because these compounds are not directly genotoxic, but the understanding of their tumor promotor potential has some implications for the toxicological testing and risk assessment.

Animals↗

Role of MAP kinase signalling pathways in the mode of action of peroxisome proliferators.

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are a class of non-genotoxic chemicals that cause rodent liver enlargement and hepatocarcinogenesis. In primary rat hepatocytes, PPs cause cell proliferation, suppression of apoptosis and peroxisome proliferation. We have investigated the role of different families of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases in the mode of action of PPs. Addition of 50 microM nafenopin to primary rat hepatocyte cultures caused weak activation of extracellular signal regulated kinases and p38 MAP kinase. However, incubation of primary hepatocytes with the p38 MAP kinase inhibitor SB203580 or the MAP kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor PD098059 prevented the induction of DNA synthesis and the suppression of transforming growth factor beta(1)-induced apoptosis by the PP nafenopin. In contrast, in the presence of these MAP kinase inhibitors, nafenopin still induced palmitoyl CoA oxidation, a measure of peroxisome proliferation. We have shown previously that PPs such as nafenopin require tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) to exert their effects on cellular proliferation and apoptosis. Here we show that treatment of primary rat hepatocyte cultures with nafenopin causes an increase in bioactive TNF-alpha and that this process requires p38 MAP kinase activity.

Animals↗

Pmp27 promotes peroxisomal proliferation.

Peroxisomes perform many essential functions in eukaryotic cells. The weight of evidence indicates that these organelles divide by budding from preexisting peroxisomes. This process is not understood at the molecular level. Peroxisomal proliferation can be induced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by oleate. This growth substrate is metabolized by peroxisomal enzymes. We have identified a protein, Pmp27, that promotes peroxisomal proliferation. This protein, previously termed Pmp24, was purified from peroxisomal membranes, and the corresponding gene, PMP27, was isolated and sequenced. Pmp27 shares sequence similarity with the Pmp30 family in Candida boidinii. Pmp27 is a hydrophobic peroxisomal membrane protein but it can be extracted by high pH, suggesting that it does not fully span the bilayer. Its expression is regulated by oleate. The function of Pmp27 was probed by observing the phenotype of strains in which the protein was eliminated by gene disruption or overproduced by expression from a multicopy plasmid. The strain containing the disruption (3B) was able to grow on all carbon sources tested, including oleate, although growth on oleate, glycerol, and acetate was slower than wild type. Strain 3B contained peroxisomes with all of the enzymes of beta-oxidation. However, in addition to the presence of a few modestly sized peroxisomes seen in a typical thin section of a cell growing on oleate-containing medium, cells of strain 3B also contained one or two very large peroxisomes. In contrast, cells in a strain in which Pmp27 was overexpressed contained an increased number of normal-sized peroxisomes. We suggest that Pmp27 promotes peroxisomal proliferation by participating in peroxisomal elongation or fission.

Acetates↗

Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) suppresses apoptosis and induces DNA synthesis in rodent hepatocytes: a mediator of the hepatocarcinogenicity of peroxisome proliferators?

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are a class of non-genotoxic rodent hepatocarcinogens that cause increased hepatocyte DNA synthesis, peroxisome proliferation and liver enlargement. We have demonstrated previously that PPs suppress both spontaneous rat hepatocyte apoptosis and that induced by the physiological negative regulator of liver growth, transforming growth factor beta (TGF beta1). Evidence suggests that the suppression of apoptosis by PPs is mediated via activation of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-alpha (PPAR alpha), a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. Here, we investigate the effects of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) on cultured rat or mouse hepatocytes to determine whether TNF alpha influences hepatocyte growth in a manner analogous to that seen with PPs. Rat recombinant TNF alpha was found to stimulate DNA synthesis and suppress apoptosis in isolated rat hepatocyte monolayers (P < or = 0.01). These effects were seen in the range of 500-5000 U/ml with a maximum effect at 5000 U/ml. Similarly, mouse recombinant TNF alpha was able to stimulate DNA synthesis in mouse hepatocyte monolayers (P < or = 0.01) with a maximal effect at 1000 U/ml. Suppression of mouse hepatocyte apoptosis by TNF alpha was not detected, possibly because of the low levels of apoptosis under control conditions. However, when the levels of mouse hepatocyte apoptosis were augmented using TGF beta1, TNF alpha caused a significant suppression (P < or = 0.01). The neutralization of TNF alpha using anti-TNF alpha antibodies abrogated significantly (P < or = 0.01) the suppression of apoptosis by the PP, nafenopin. These data that suggest TNF alpha may mediate, at least in part, the growth perturbation, liver enlargement and hepatocarcinogenesis seen in response to the PP class of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens.

Animals↗

Induction of the major integral membrane protein of mouse liver peroxisomes by peroxisome proliferators.

Peroxisome proliferators are known to increase the volume of the peroxisomal compartment in rodent liver. We have examined the induction of the major integral membrane protein of mouse liver peroxisomes (PMP68) by a number of these agents, and compared this with their effect on the peroxisomal bifunctional protein (PBP), an enzyme of the beta-oxidation pathway which is located in the peroxisome matrix. Dietary clofibrate, di-2-(ethylhexyl)phthalate and Wy-14,643, three structurally unrelated proliferators, all increased the mRNA and protein content of PMP68 approx. 2-fold, whereas PBP was induced 8-13-fold. The kinetics and sequence of induction of PMP68 and PBP following a single dose of Wy-14,643 were compared and shown to be similar, and the effects were reversible. Another proliferator, BM 15766, caused maximal induction of PMP68 but only a low induction of PBP; further PBP induction was achieved by the administration of BM 15766 in combination with Wy-14,643. Similarly, BM 15766 and Wy-14,643 increased transcription of the PMP68 gene in vitro, whereas PBP gene transcription was increased by Wy-14,643 but not by BM 15766. Thus peroxisome proliferators enhance the expression of the genes for both the membrane protein PMP68 and the matrix protein PBP, but the regulation of this expression appears to be mediated by different mechanisms.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Comparison of the effects of various peroxisome proliferators on peroxisomal enzyme activities, DNA synthesis, and apoptosis in rat and human hepatocyte cultures.

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are a class of rodent nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens that cause hepatocyte peroxisome proliferation, increased DNA synthesis, and decreased spontaneous apoptosis. We examined the effects of various PPs such as the hypolipidemic agents clofibric acid (CLO), bezafibrate (BEZA), ciprofibrate (CIPRO), and nafenopin (NAFE) and the plasticizer di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) on the various parameters in vitro in rat and human hepatocyte cultures. In rat hepatocyte cultures, after 72 h of treatment with the various PPs at 100-500 microM, a compound-dependent increase in acyl CoA oxidase (ACO) and carnitine acetyl transferase (CAT) activities, markers of peroxisome proliferation, was observed with the following potencies: CIPRO = NAFE > BEZA > CLO > DEHP. A minor (120-150%), but significant, no concentration-dependent increase in DNA synthesis and a marked, no compound-dependent and, with the exception of NAFE, no concentration-dependent 60-80% decrease in spontaneous apoptosis was observed with all tested compounds (50-250 microM) after 48 h of treatment. Inhibition of spontaneous apoptosis in PP-treated versus control rat hepatocyte cultures was also observed morphologically. Furthermore, PPs inhibited transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta)-induced apoptosis but not tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha)/alpha Amanitine (alphaAma)-induced apoptosis in rat hepatocyte cultures. In human hepatocyte cultures, the various PPs at 50-500 microM did not affect peroxisomal enzyme activities, DNA synthesis, or spontaneous and induced (TGFbeta or TNFalpha/alphaAma) apoptosis. The compound-dependent peroxisome proliferation but no compound-dependent disruption of the mitogenic/apoptotic balance elicited by PPs in primary rat hepatocyte cultures supports the hypothesis that oxidative stress is directly linked to the hepatocarcinogenic potential of a given PP in rodents and that disruption of the mitogenic/apoptotic balance contributes to the development of PP-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. In addition, the absence of effects of all PPs on both peroxisome proliferation-associated parameters and mitogenic/apoptotic balance supports the hypothesis that human liver cells are refractory to PP-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.

Acyl-CoA Oxidase↗

Opposing mechanisms of NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase regulation by peroxisome proliferators.

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) regulate a battery of rodent P450 genes, including CYP2B, CYP2C, and CYP4A family members. We hypothesized that other components of the P450-metabolizing system are altered by exposure to PPs, including NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (P450R), an often rate-limiting component in P450-dependent reactions. In this study, we determined whether exposure to structurally diverse PPs alters the expression of P450R mRNA and protein. Increases in P450R mRNA levels were observed in male and female F-344 rat livers and in male rat kidneys after chronic exposure of the animals to PPs. Paradoxically, under the same treatment conditions in male rats, liver P450R protein levels decreased after exposure to the PPs Wy-14,643 ([4-chloro-6-(2,3-xylidino)pyrimidynylthio]acetic acid) (WY) or gemfibrozil (GEM). The down-regulation of the P450R protein was sex- and tissue-specific in that exposure to PPs led to increases in P450R protein in female rat livers [di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) only] and male rat kidneys (WY, GEM, DBP). In male wild-type SV129 mice, P450R mRNA levels increased in livers after exposure to WY and diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and in male kidneys after exposure to DEHP. Induction of mRNA by PPs was not observed in the liver or kidneys of mice, which lack a functional peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha), the central mediator of the effects of PPs in the rodent liver. In wild-type male mice, P450R protein was decreased in liver after WY and DEHP treatment and in kidneys after WY treatment. The down-regulation of the P450R protein was not observed in PPAR alpha-null mice. These studies demonstrate the complex regulation of P450R expression by PPs at two different levels, both of which are dependent upon PPAR alpha: up-regulation of transcript levels in liver and kidneys and down-regulation of protein levels in male rat and mouse liver by a novel posttranscriptional mechanism.

Animals↗

Central role of PPARalpha in the mechanism of action of hepatocarcinogenic peroxisome proliferators.

Peroxisome proliferators (PP) are a large class of structurally dissimilar chemicals. These chemicals have diverse effects in rodents and humans, including regulation of lipid metabolism, growth promotion, and induction of hepatocarcinogenesis. Most, if not all, effects of PP are mediated by three members of the nuclear receptor superfamily called PP-activated receptors (PPAR). In this review, we discuss the evidence that PPARalpha, the predominant PPAR in the, liver is involved in the growth promoting and hepatocarcinogenic effects of PP.

Acyl-CoA Oxidase↗

Phosphorylation of 13 kDa nuclear protein in hepatocarcinomas induced by peroxisome proliferators.

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are nongenotoxic compounds causing the emergence of hepatocellular carcinoma in rodents, but the mechanisms of the hepatocarcinogenesis have been unclear. The authors examined the changes in phosphorylation of nuclear proteins after treatment with (4-chloro-6-[2,3-xylidino]-2-pyrimidinylthio) acetic acid (Wy-14,643). Wy-14,643 (0.1% w/w in diet) was given orally to male F-344 rats for up to 80 wk. In the hepatocarcinomas induced by Wy-14,643, phosphorylation of 13 kDa nuclear protein (NP 13), which was resistant to alkaline treatment, was significantly increased. NP 13 phosphorylation gradually increased, dependent on treatment period. Furthermore, in the hepatocarcinomas induced by other PP, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, increase in NP13-phosphorylation was also observed. Therefore, NP 13-phosphorylation may relate to development of preneoplastic or neoplastic lesions induced by PPs.

Animals↗

Regulation of apoptosis by peroxisome proliferators.

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) constitute a large and chemically diverse family of non-genotoxic rodent hepatocarcinogens that activate the PP-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha). In order to investigate the hypothesis that PPs elicit their carcinogenic effects through the suppression of apoptosis, we established an in vitro assay for apoptosis using both primary rat hepatocytes and the FaO rat hepatoma cell line. Apoptosis was induced by transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFbeta1), the physiological negative regulator of liver growth. In this system, PPs could suppress both spontaneous and TGFbeta1-induced apoptosis. In order to understand the mechanisms of this regulation of apoptosis, we conducted microarray analysis followed by pathway-specific gene clustering in TGFbeta1-treated cells. After treatment, 76 genes were up-regulated and 185 were down-regulated more than 1.5-fold. Cluster analysis of up-regulated genes revealed three clusters, A-C. Cluster A (4h) was associated with 12% apoptosis and consisted of genes mainly of the cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix such as troponin and the proteoglycan SDC4. In cluster B (8h; 25% apoptosis), there were many pro- and anti-apoptotic genes such as XIAP, BAK1 and BAD, whereas at 16h (40% apoptosis) the regulated genes were mainly those of the cellular stress pathways such as the genes implicated in the activation of the transcription factor NFkappab. Genes found down-regulated in response to TGFbeta1 were mainly those associated with oxidative stress and several genes implicated in glutathione production and maintenance. Thus, TGFbeta1 may induce apoptosis via a down regulation of oxidant defence leading to the generation of reactive oxygen species. The ability of PPs to impact on these apoptosis pathways remains to be determined. To approach this question, we have developed a technique using laser capture microdissection of livers treated with the PP, clofibric acid coupled with gene expression array analysis. Results show that some of the key steps of the LCM process had an impact on the gene profiles generated. However, this did not preclude accurate determination of a PP-specific molecular signature. Thus, the choice of appropriate controls will ensure that meaningful gene expression analyses can be performed on tissue microdissected from the foci generated in clofibric acid treated livers. These data will allow the identification of specific genes that are regulated by PPs leading to changes in apoptosis and ultimately to tumours.

Animals↗

Studies of early hepatocellular proliferation and peroxisomal proliferation in Sprague-Dawley rats treated with tumorigenic doses of clofibrate.

Clofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator, is hepatocarcinogenic in rats in a dose-dependent fashion. While there is a relationship between peroxisome proliferation and rodent liver carcinogenesis, recent evidence also suggests an association between the tumorigenicity of peroxisome proliferators and sustained cell proliferation. To investigate the role of early cell proliferation in clofibrate-induced carcinogenesis and the predictive potential of this endpoint, in a 3-month study, rats were fed clofibrate doses equivalent to those used in the chronic bioassay, and cell proliferation was determined after 1 week and 3 months, using a 1-week continuous bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-labeling technique. Adult Sprague-Dawley rats were fed clofibrate at 1500, 4500, or 9000 ppm. Six rats/sex/group were killed after 1 or 13 weeks of treatment. Osmotic minipumps containing BrdU were implanted into rats 7 days prior to necropsy to determine the cumulative 7-day hepatocyte labeling index immunohistochemically. A dose-related increase in hepatocyte labeling index was seen after 1 week of treatment. However, at 13 weeks, sustained increases in hepatocyte proliferation were not seen; but a dose-related decrease in the hepatocyte labeling index was observed. Liver stereology at 13 weeks demonstrated a dose-related increase in liver weight and volume, but a decrease in hepatocyte nuclei per unit volume, a minimal increase or no change in the total number of hepatocyte nuclei per liver, and an absolute decline in the total number of BrdU-labeled hepatocyte nuclei per liver. These data suggest that in rats, clofibrate may influence hepatocarcinogenicity by decreases in normal hepatocyte proliferation over time and this effect may influence the pathogenesis of tumors at time points beyond 13 weeks of treatment.

Administration, Oral↗