Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Peritoneal Lavage”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of experimental blunt and penetrating hepatobiliary trauma by sequential peritoneal lavage.

Peritoneal lavage, when used in the standard way to detect hemoperitoneum, gives no information regarding site or nature of injury. We think that it would be useful for the surgeon to be more able to characterize intraabdominal injuries preoperatively, and that this may be possible by extending the scope and duration of the technique of peritoneal lavage. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the use of sequential peritoneal lavage with extended chemical analysis to precisely define the nature and extent of hepatobiliary trauma in an animal model. Thirty-six dogs were divided randomly among one control and four experimental groups in which sham laparotomy, blunt thoracoabdominal trauma, direct laceration of the liver, liver laceration plus bowel perforation, and gallbladder perforation were carried out. Sequential peritoneal lavage was performed over a six-hour experimental period with simultaneous serum and lavage samples analyzed for red and white blood cells, bile, and enzyme activity (GOT, GPT, and alkaline phosphatase) at four test intervals up to six hours post injury. Our results demonstrate that enzyme activity is easily detectable in lavage effluent after blunt hepatic injury but not after penetrating trauma, and seems to correlate with the extent of hepatocellular disruption. Lavage white cell counts in excess of those anticipated for hemorrhage alone are present only in association with an inflammatory stimulus other than blood or bile. A lavage-to-serum-bilirubin ratio of one or more can be expected after gallbladder or extrahepatic biliary perforation. This information may be valuable in the emergency assessment of the trauma patient.

Alanine Transaminase↗

The value of continuous 72-hour peritoneal lavage for peritonitis.

Studies were performed in 120 rabbits to determine whether 72-hour peritoneal lavage is beneficial or harmful in the treatment of peritonitis. Results showed that against a high concentration fecal inoculum (90 percent mortality), peritoneal lavage containing gentamicin and clindamycin reduced mortality to 10 to 20 percent (p less than 0.05). Parenteral antibiotics alone and lavage not containing antibiotics did not decrease mortality. By contrast, against a low fecal inoculum (30 percent mortality), peritoneal lavage containing gentamicin and clindamycin did not alter mortality. However, lavage not containing antibiotics increased mortality to 70 to 80 percent (p less than 0.05). These data demonstrate that continuous peritoneal lavage may be helpful in the treatment of peritonitis provided the lavage solution contains antibiotics and may be harmful if it does not contain antibiotics.

Animals↗

The effect of peritoneal lavage on peritoneal cellular defense mechanisms.

To assess the effect of peritoneal lavage on peritoneal cellular defense mechanisms, peritoneal fluid total cell counts, cell types, phagocytic activity and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNL) chemotaxis before and 4 hours after saline lavage was studied on 70 rats. Lavage with 10 ml saline decreased the peritoneal total cell counts of rats from 10.6 x 10(6) to 6.6 x 10(6) (p < 0.005). Among the peritoneal cells, the fraction of PMNL increased whereas the macrophages, lymphocytes and mast cells decreased (p < 0.005). The phagocytic activity of peritoneal phagocytic cells did not change significantly by peritoneal lavage. However, after lavage, PMNL instead of macrophages were the prominent phagocytic cells. Chemotactic index of peritoneal PMNL also did not change with saline lavage. It is concluded that although the phagocytic and chemotactic activity of peritoneal fluid cells are not affected by peritoneal lavage, cellular defense of the peritoneum may be compromised by altering the total cell counts and their composition.

Animals↗

[Therapy of diffuse suppurative peritonitis with continuous peritoneal lavage].

Peritonitis is a severe illness with a high mortality rate and different treatment modalities. Over a time period of 12 years 510 patients with peritonitis treated with continuous peritoneal lavage (CPL) were retrospectively analyzed. 315 of 510 patients with a mean age of 57.4 and a mean APACHE-II-Score of 10.2 on admission had a diffuse four quadrant peritonitis. 195 had a local and diffuse peritonitis due to perforation of the appendix. 232 of 315 patients with diffuse peritonitis (73.7%) had a secondary peritonitis, mostly due to organ perforation. The most frequent comorbidities were congestive heart failure (36.8%), pulmonary diseases (26%), diabetes mellitus (18.7%), chronic renal failure (16.8%), chronic liver diseases (9.5%) and a history of alcohol abuse (12.4%). On admission 18.7% had pulmonary insufficiency, 18.4% renal failure, 14.3% congestive heart failure and 13.3% hepatic insufficiency. 14% had one organ-, 6.7% two organ-, 2.5% three organ- and 5% four organ failure. The mean duration of lavage was 5.1 days with a fluid amount of 8-24 l/day. 81.3% of all patients could be treated successfully. 46 patients were reoperated due to persistent peritonitis. The mortality rate of the primarily treated patients was 15.6% compared to 37.0% of patients who had to be reoperated. The mortality rate of all patients was 18.7%. The prognosis of the clinical outcome was significantly influenced by preexisting organ failure and by the duration of the peritonitis on admission. Our results on CPL for diffuse peritonitis are in accordance with results from other treatment modalities; a direct comparison was not possible due to the different patient groups.

APACHE↗

How to perform a diagnostic peritoneal lavage.

Peritoneal lavage can be a very helpful investigation in the initial management of trauma patients. The technique demands some basic surgical skills but has been shown to be relatively safe and accurate when performed by appropriately trained junior doctors.

Abdominal Injuries↗

A comparison of open peritoneal lavage with modified closed peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma.

A randomized prospective study compared open peritoneal lavage using a peritoneal dialysis catheter with modified closed lavage using either the Lazarus-Nelson or Cook lavage catheter. The time required to perform the lavage, technical difficulties, complications, and accuracy were assessed in 63 adult victims of blunt abdominal trauma. The average time to perform lavage was 21.1 minutes for open lavage, 14.7 minutes for Lazarus-Nelson closed lavage, and 9.8 minutes for Cook closed lavage. The closed technique using the Cook catheter was significantly faster than open lavage. Technical difficulties were significantly less frequent with Cook catheter closed lavage than with Lazarus-Nelson catheter closed lavage. The overall complication rate was 1.8%, and the overall accuracy was 98.1%, without apparent difference among techniques. It is concluded that, when no contraindications to closed lavage exist, and when time is of importance, closed lavage with the Cook catheter is the preferred technique.

Abdominal Injuries↗

[Intermittent peritoneal lavage following generalized peritonitis in the neonatal period and infancy].

Between 1981 and 1985, 15 neonates and young infants, who suffered from severe putrid or faecal peritonitis due to perforation of the gastrointestinal tract, were treated by intermittent postoperative peritoneal lavage. During the operation 2 to 4 drains were inserted into the peritoneal cavity. Immediately after operation peritoneal lavage was started with 20 ml/kg body weight Ringer or peritoneal dialysis solution. Inflow of the solution was done during a 20 minutes period. The solution then remained in the peritoneal cavity for another 20 min., before the 20 min. outflow was started (tidal-like rhythm). We did not use antibiotics or antiseptics in addition to the saline fluid to prevent damage to the tissue and adhesions of the bowel. Serum electrolytes, blood urea and body temperature can be changed by variation of the solution. After the operation the patients must remain in the intensive care unit. Accurate and detailed documentation of the balance of the inflow and outflow is very important. Five of the fifteen treated infants died due to additional malformations and complications following sepsis. All of them were premature with necrotising enterocolitis. Our experience with intermittent peritoneal lavage in selected patients suggest to use it in the management of infants with severe peritonitis due to perforation of the intestine.

Drainage↗

[Peritoneal lavage in standardized peritonitis models].

The peritoneal lavage in peritonitis can be studied in a standardized manner only in animal models, because peritonitis is too variable and dependent on too many patient related factors. In this article answers are given to questions on the influence of different lavage substances on survival, local and systemic concentrations of bacteria, endotoxin, and TNF as well as on mesothelial adherence of bacteria. These data refer to results from acute models of infection published in the literature. Furthermore, we show from our own chronic peritonitis model the influence of the peritoneal lavage on abscess formation and translocation. After inoculation of a Bacteroides fragilis suspension, a chronic abscess forming peritonitis was induced. At day 3/7/14 intraabdominal abscesses were found in 2/4/6 of 8/5/6 animals in an untreated, in 1/3/5 of 5/5/5 animals in a saline lavaged, and in 5/0/2 of 5/5/5 animals in a Taurolidin lavaged group, respectively. Both, the intraabdominal and the systemic bacterial dissemination were more effectively inhibited by the Taurolidin lavage than by the saline lavage.

Animals↗

Antibiotic peritoneal lavage in severe peritonitis. A preliminary assessment.

A method of intra- and postoperative antibiotic peritoneal lavage, using 0.015% gentamicin in dialysis solution, has been assessed for the treatment of life-threatening peritonitis. It is believed to be the first time that the use of gentamicin for this purpose has been recorded, and the first time that antibiotic peritoneal lavage has been used for the treatment of a series of patients with peritonitis of gynaecological or obstetrical origin. At Baragwanath Hosital, gynaecological patients with life-threatening purulent peritonitis arising from septic abortions, tubal sepsis (ruptured pyosalpinx) or postoperative causes, were studied. Thirty-eight such patients undergoing standard operative treatment had a mortality of 47.4%, which is in accordance with world figures for serious peritonitis. In 38 patients, after the addition of antibiotic peritoneal lavage, mortality was halved to 2397%, with minimal morbidity. The procedure used has been fully described, and is recommended for wider trial in patients with life-threatening peritonitis or peritoneal soiling.

Abortion, Septic↗

Mechanically assisted intraoperative peritoneal lavage for generalized peritonitis as a result of perforation of the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract.

BACKGROUND: The efficiency of intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) and peritoneal drainage in patients with generalized peritonitis remains controversial. The benefit of large volume IOPL, using a newly designed device, and of peritoneal drainage were evaluated in 101 patients with generalized peritonitis. STUDY DESIGN: Patients were divided into two groups, one treated by mechanically assisted IOPL (group 1), and the other treated by manual IOPL (group 2). They were further divided into two groups, one undergoing drainage (DR group) and the other undergoing no drainage (ND group). Based on data in the progress notes, patients in these groups were compared with each other with respect to disease process, volume of IOPL fluid, incidence of infectious complications, and other prognostic factors. RESULTS: In group 1, the incidence of infectious complications was significantly lower than in group 2 (10.8 versus 62.9 percent, p < 0.01). Patients who underwent operative treatment 12 hours or more after onset of peritonitis had a lower incidence of infection following high volume IOPL (greater than or equal to 30 L) compared with those patients who underwent low volume IOPL. The incidence of infectious complications was significantly higher in the DR group (32.8 versus 12.9 percent). CONCLUSIONS: A large volume of saline (greater than or equal to 30 L) was needed for IOPL. The new device for IOPL proved to be very successful and efficient. When IOPL was successful, it seemed that peritoneal drainage did not provide any additional benefits to the treatment of generalized peritonitis.

Adolescent↗

Peritoneal lavage in appendicular peritonitis.

Peritoneal lavage resulted in a significant reduction in the duration of hospital stay in a retrospective series of 189 children with peritonitis secondary to perforation of the appendix. Antibiotic peritoneal lavage also resulted in a significant reduction in the number of children with septic and adhesive complications compared with antiseptic lavage and no lavage, mainly as a result of fewer wound infections. The overall incidence of residual intraperitoneal infection was low, and although differences in this respect were not significant, none of the children treated with antibiotic peritoneal lavage required reoperation for intraperitoneal sepsis.

Appendicitis↗

Postoperative peritoneal lavage in generalised peritonitis. A prospective analysis.

Fifty patients with generalised peritonitis were studied in the period between November 1984 and May 1986, 20 with postoperative peritoneal lavage and 30 with only conventional treatment. The study revealed that lavage could not reduce mortality. There was a large number of reperforation and anastomotic leak associated with it. Among patients who survived, lavage did however aid in rendering patients afebrile and in the return of the bowel sound early. Hospital stay was also reduced. We agree with earlier suggestions that the use of peritoneal lavage with its labour, intensiveness and potential complications is restricted to gross peritoneal contamination and its use in lesser degree of peritonitis is questionable.

Humans↗

Continual postoperative antibiotic peritoneal lavage in diffuse peritonitis complicating cesarean section.

Nine women treated surgically for diffuse peritonitis complicating cesarean section underwent continual postoperative antibiotic peritoneal lavage as an adjunct to surgery. In all the patients the indication for surgery was failure to respond to standard medical therapy. Seven patients treated with hysterectomy recovered without evidence of continuing peritonitis or intraabdominal abscess formation. One of two patients in whom uterine conservation was attempted required an emergency hysterectomy three days later. In this series, continual postoperative antibiotic peritoneal lavage appeared to be an effective adjunctive treatment in the prevention of continuing peritonitis and abscess formation provided that hysterectomy was performed at the initial operation.

Adult↗