Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Peripheral nerve block”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

The analgesic efficacy of intrathecal morphine compared to peripheral regional analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Following elective total hip arthroplasty, pain continues to be a significant problem. Intrathecal morphine or peripheral regional analgesia, that is local infiltration analgesia or peripheral nerve block, are common analgesic modalities, but it is still not known which is superior. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: The following electronic databases were searched from inception to 24 March 2026: CENTRAL; Ovid Embase; Ovid MEDLINE; Scopus; and Web of Science. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared intrathecal morphine to peripheral regional analgesia in patients scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty under general or spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS: Eight trials and 471 patients were included. The peripheral regional analgesia was peripheral nerve block in six trials and local infiltration analgesia in two trials. No difference was demonstrated between intrathecal morphine and peripheral regional analgesia in regard to the first coprimary outcome, the pain score at rest at 24 h. The quality of evidence was moderate. Intrathecal morphine was found to be superior to peripheral regional analgesia with respect to the second coprimary outcome, the cumulative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h. Mean difference (95% CI) was 11.38 mg (4.31-18.45; P  = 0.002, I2  = 81%). The quality of evidence was low. Intrathecal morphine was revealed to be superior to peripheral regional analgesia at 8-12 h for the pain score at rest, 1.24 (0.60-1.88); P  = 0.0001, I2  = 68%; pain score on movement, 1.15 (0.12-2.17), P  = 0.03, I2  = 65%; but the rate of in hospital pruritus was reduced with peripheral regional analgesia, 0.31 (0.17-0.58), P  = 0.0002, I2  = 0%. No differences in functional status were shown. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference between intrathecal morphine and peripheral regional analgesia in regard to pain score at rest at 24 h. Intrathecal morphine may lead to a favourable effect on some but not all analgesic indices compared to peripheral regional analgesia in elective total hip arthroplasty. The quality of evidence for these positive effects was low. Intrathecal morphine reduced the systemic opioid consumption, but is not in itself an opioid free strategy. This notion is supported by the increased incidence of in hospital pruritus with intrathecal morphine. The quality of evidence for this was high. In view of the quality of evidence, high quality randomised controlled trials are required to substantiate these results.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Morbidity and mortality from local anesthetics: localized and systemic toxicity.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Local anesthetics remain vital to modern medicine, yet their narrow therapeutic window continues to result in complications. This review synthesizes recent literature to define the current landscape of local anesthetic-associated adverse events. RECENT FINDINGS: Perioperative mortality attributable to local anesthetics persists despite sustained safety initiatives and professional society recommendations. Pharmacovigilance and case data identify lidocaine (oropharyngeal, topical, and via local infiltration) as the predominant contributor to adverse outcomes, including death. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity remains an issue, with a recent shift in epidemiology: an increasing proportion of toxic events originates from surgeon- and proceduralist-administered analgesia. Anesthesiologist-controlled methods also cause toxicity via catheter-based delivery and nerve blocks in highly vascular regions. Localized toxicity in the form of high neuraxial contributes to morbidity, with recent reviews reinforcing known risk factors; whereas localized neurotoxicity appears less troublesome when managed appropriately. SUMMARY: The cumulative evidence identifies shifts in the patterns of systemic and localized toxicities. Bupivacaine-based peripheral nerve blocks no longer represent the principal cause of complications because of the advent of ultrasound guidance and lipid emulsion therapy. In contrast, high neuraxial techniques persist as a cause of morbidity, accompanied by intravenous/oropharyngeal lidocaine, proceduralist-administered local infiltration analgesia, and catheter-based delivery.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

A one‑year snapshot of pediatric regional anesthesia at a French Tertiary University Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia (RA) is a major component of multimodal perioperative analgesia in children. Despite proven benefits, pediatric RA practice shows marked inter-institutional and international variability, with global practice patterns remaining largely underreported. This study aimed to characterize current RA practices in a pediatric anesthesia department of a French tertiary university hospital. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data over one year included all children aged 0-18 years receiving at least one RA procedure. The data analyzed comprised demographics, surgical characteristics, RA techniques, guidance methods, and pharmacologic agents. Each RA procedure was considered an independent event, and patients were stratified into five age groups. RESULTS: Over the study period, 907 patients (6.0 [1.0; 12.0] years) underwent 1073 RA procedures: 894 peripheral blocks (83%) and 179 neuraxial blocks (17%). Peripheral blocks predominated in children >6 months (90%), while 59% of neuraxial RA were in infants <6 months. RA was conducted under general anesthesia in 90% of cases; awake spinal anesthesia in small infants comprised most neuraxial procedures. Ultrasound guidance was used in 98% of peripheral blocks, and pre-puncture scanning preceded 22% of neuraxial procedures. Clonidine was used as an adjuvant in >60% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: This single-center cohort reports one year of pediatric RA practice, characterized by high RA implementation rates. While ultrasound guidance was standard for peripheral blocks, pre-puncture scanning remains infrequently used for neuraxial techniques, highlighting a potential margin for improvement based on current practice. Results highlight selective neuraxial strategies in vulnerable infants and routine adjuvant use to optimize postoperative analgesia. Findings confirm RA feasibility in daily pediatric anesthesia and support multicenter studies evaluating inter-institutional variability and outcomes impact.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Nucleolin promotes neuropathic pain by increasing chromatin accessibility at the Ccl2 promoter in primary sensory neurons.

Nerve injury-induced transcriptional alterations in primary sensory neurons of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) constitute a key molecular basis for the development of neuropathic pain. Nucleolin (NCL), a highly conserved multifunctional nucleolar protein, regulates gene transcription. Here, we identify that NCL is expressed exclusively in the nuclei of DRG neurons. Peripheral nerve injury time-dependently upregulates Ncl mRNA and NCL protein levels in injured DRG neurons. Blocking this upregulation through DRG microinjection of the adeno-associated virus 9 (AAV9) expressing an shRNA targeting Ncl attenuates nerve injury-induced increases of C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) mRNA and its protein in injured DRG and alleviates the development and maintenance of mechanical, heat and cold hypersensitivities. Conversely, mimicking DRG NCL upregulation through DRG microinjection of AAV9 carrying the full-length Ncl coding sequence increases Ccl2 mRNA and CCL2 protein levels in microinjected DRGs and produces neuropathic pain-like symptoms in the absence of nerve injury. Mechanistically, peripheral nerve injury increases NCL occupancy at the Ccl2 promoter and enhances chromatin accessibility at this locus, resulting in elevated CCL2 expression in injured DRG neurons, which is reversed by NCL knockdown. Given that Ncl mRNA is co-expressed with Ccl2 mRNA in individual DRG neurons, our findings suggest that NCL upregulation in the DRG contributes to neuropathic pain likely by increasing chromatin accessibility at the Ccl2 promoter in primary sensory neurons.

Animals↗