SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
We have treated nine patients with persistent pericardial effusions using the peritoneal and pericardial window technique, over the past four years, without surgical mortality and with effective results; reoperation was not necessary for reaccumulation of effusion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aforementioned minimally invasive technique allows the surgeon to create a large pericardial window with minimal morbidity. Adequate long term drainage is provided and sufficient specimen for pathologic examination is obtained.
A technique for pericardioscopy at the time of subxiphoid pericardial window was evaluated in 17 patients undergoing surgery for clinically suspected malignant pericardial effusion. Best results were obtained using a rigid mediastinoscope for inspection of the posterior and lateral pericardial surfaces. No complications ensued, although many patients experienced cardiac arrythmias which always resolved with removal of the scope. Pericardioscopy revealed cancer transgressing the pericardium near the pulmonary veins in one patient, and this would have been missed without pericardioscopy. Pericardioscopy confirmed palpable metastatic deposits on the inferior pericardial surface in two other patients. In 14 patients, pericardioscopy did not reveal malignancy, although four of these patients had both positive fluid cytologic findings and malignant infiltration of the pericardial biopsy. In one patient a palpable but not visible nodule was proved to be an extrinsic hepatic metastasis. Pericardioscopy is a safe intervention chiefly applicable in patients with central tumors and pericardial effusion in whom subxiphoid pericardial window is not clearly diagnostic at the time of surgery.
Abstract The classic subxiphoid pericardial window technique and the newer, minimally invasive percutaneous fluoroscopy-controlled method of surgical treatment of pericardial effusions and/or tamponade are reviewed and compared based on 12 years of surgical experience. Since 1988, 114 patients underwent surgery for treatment of pericardial effusion and/or tamponade. The classic subxiphoid approach was used on 66 patients, and since 1993, the percutaneous tube pericardiostomy method was employed on 48 patients. In choosing a method for pericardial decompression, disease etiology and patient characteristics must be considered as well as the experience of the surgeon.
A technique to create a pericardial window is discussed. By creating a communication between the pericardial and peritoneal cavities, adequate drainage is obtained without the need for external draining systems. The technique is simple, easy to learn, and without serious complications.
The clinical symptoms of cardiac tamponade associated with malignancy are reviewed, and the importance of these symptoms in relationship to treatment decisions are discussed. The clinical findings of tamponade and the echocardiographic findings have been correlated. The approach to treatment of cardiac tamponade has been summarized. The various surgical techniques, including pericardial window formation, subxyphoid drainage, and thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracoscopy, are discussed and the relative benefits of the various procedures have been presented. Results of the less invasive percutaneous balloon pericardiostomy procedure have also been reviewed, and updates of recent small series have been included. Medical management of malignant pericardial effusion with small-bore tube drainage followed by sclerosis has been reviewed, and the results of recent series reporting the effectiveness of various sclerosing agents, including tetracycline, doxycycline, and bleomycin, have been compared.
Pericardial effusion can be treated effectively by the technique of subxiphoid pericardial window. We present a case in which the Cooper retractor designed for transcervical thymectomy facilitated this operation. When available, the Cooper retractor can be useful in selected patients.
Patients with effusive pericardial disease are often in poor general condition. In this case a well tolerated relatively safe therapy ist of mainly importance. We elaborate a technique of endoscopic pericardial window procedure. In this way it is possible to combine a minimally invasive proceeding with sufficient diagnosis and therapy.
PURPOSE: To describe the technique and our experience in percutaneous creation of a pericardial window in patients with recurrent pericardial effusion. METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients (9 men, 2 women; mean age 61 years, range 37-79 years) with recurrent pericardial effusion were treated from December 1994 to October 2000. Malignant effusion was the cause of cardiac tamponade in nine patients. Puncture of the pericardial space was performed under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance. Once a guidewire was safely positioned in the pericardial cavity and the wall of the pericardium was identified, the pericardial keyhole was dilated with an 18 mm balloon catheter. A temporary (1-3 day) 8 Fr pigtail catheter was inserted in order to stabilize the tract and aspirate the fluid. RESULTS: The aim of creating a pericardial window was achieved in all 11 patients. There were three recurrences (27%) of pericardial effusion and three early deaths (27%) due to progression of the underlying disease, which occurred within 30 days following the procedure. Follow-up ranged from 6 days to 382 days, mean 147 days. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous creation of a pericardial window can be a safe therapeutic alternative for patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion, particularly if this has a malignant etiology.
Delayed-onset pericardial effusion following coronary artery bypass grafts can give rise to significant morbidity in its presentation and in its management by traditional surgical techniques. A video-assisted thoracoscopic technique to create a pericardial window, with the advantage of a minimally invasive approach combined with excellent visualization in such a patient is described.
Pericardial interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of pericardial disease has been evolving since the 17th century. The controversy over opened or closed procedures, the optimal guidance modality, and techniques for the creation of pericardial windows continues to be debated. This report describes two patients who received the endoscopic approach to creating a pericardial window.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pericardial window creation by percutaneous balloon dilation in children with recurrent, symptomatic, nonmalignant pericardial effusion, 6 boys and 4 girls, age 5-12 yr, underwent the procedure using the subxiphoid approach. The procedure was successful in 9 patients. There was one case with rupture of the balloon and entrapment of its distal part within the pericardium. During follow-up (mean 14.6 mo) there was reaccumulation of fluid only in the patient in whom rupture of the balloon had occurred. No other complications were noted. Thus, percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy appears to be a safe and effective technique for the creation of a pericardial window in children with nonmalignant pericardial effusions, and may be used as an alternative to surgical window creation.
Videosurgery is a relatively non-invasive method of draining the pericardium by the creation of a pleuropericardial window. It provides an excellent view of the thoracic cavity and allows selection of pericardial and pleural, pulmonary or mediastinal biopsy sites. The authors report their preliminary results with this technique. Between May 1994 and May 1995, 22 patients with pericardial effusions were operated by videosurgery at the Pitié Hospital. None of the patients had clinical signs of tamponade. The technique consists in introducing, through 2 or 3 thoracic incisions of 15 mm, trocarts allowing passage of an endoscopic camera and different surgical instruments. Access to the thoracic cavity enabled assessment of the pleura, evacuation of pleural effusions (n = 8) and biopsy of pleural nodules (n = 2). One pulmonary biopsy was performed. Opening the pericardium enabled evacuation of pericardial effusions averaging 622 ml. Pericardial biopsies showed appearances suggesting tuberculosis (n = 2), lupic vasculitis (n = 1) and post-radiation pericarditis (n = 1). In other cases, a histologic diagnosis of non-specific pericarditis was made. A biopsy of a pleural nodule showed undifferentiated carcinoma in one case. A pulmonary biopsy revealed the presence of relatively undifferentiated carcinoma. There were no complications related to the technique. There was one recurrence of pericardial effusion at one month in a patient with carcinoma of the lung who had previously had subxiphoid drainage. There were no cases of secondary pericardial constriction. Therefore, videosurgery is a relatively non-invasive and effective technique of pericardial drainage and biopsy. When there is no emergency, it is probably the method of choice in the treatment and diagnosis of pericardial effusions.
BACKGROUND: Video-assisted thoracoscopy with the creation of a pericardial window is a noninvasive method of pericardial drainage. It also allows an excellent view of both the pleural cavity and pericardium and the precise selection of biopsy sites. We review our 3-year experience with this technique. METHODS: Between January 2001 and February 2004, 18 patients (10 men, 8 women; mean age 57 years) with echocardiographically diagnosed pericardial effusion underwent video-assisted thoracoscopy at our center. Pericardial windows were created under general anesthesia and single-lung ventilation using 2 to 3 trocars. Mean operating time was 46 minutes. A right thoracic approach was used in 16 patients and a left thoracic approach in 2. RESULTS: Microbiology and virology cultures of the pericardial fluid were negative. Histologic findings were compatible with tuberculosis in 2 cases and granulocytic sarcoma, infiltrating breast carcinoma, and infiltrating nonsmall cell carcinoma in 1 case each. In the remaining patients, the histologic diagnosis was chronic or subacute nonspecific pericarditis. Talc pleurodesis was performed in 3 patients for concomitant malignant pleural effusion. In 4 patients, the pericardial effusion occurred secondary to cardiac surgery; 3 were receiving anticoagulants after valve replacement, and 1 had a heart transplant. There were no complications of the thoracoscopy technique. CONCLUSIONS: Video-assisted thoracoscopic fenestration is an effective technique for pericardial drainage and biopsy. Apart from its diagnostic value, it allows the physician to fashion a pleuropericardial window for effective drainage while avoiding the complications of classic surgical procedures. Concomitant pleural and pulmonary disorders may be managed simultaneously.
Creation of a transabdominal transdiaphragmatic pericardial window for life-threatening recurrent pericardial effusion has proved to be a safe minimally invasive technique. By inducing adequate pericardial sac decompression while avoiding single-lung ventilation and thoracic drainage in severely ill patients, it provides anatomopathologic diagnosis and can direct further therapeutic measures. The transabdominal approach improves postoperative recovery dramatically by limiting postoperative pain and prevents sometimes invalidating intercostal neuralgia. Transabdominal pericardial sac fenestration should be part of the armamentarium used by every minimally invasive surgeon.
From August 1986 to February 2000, three patients were given a pericardial-peritoneal window using a subxiphoidal approach, for pericardial effusion associated with chronic exudative pericarditis. Complete drainage without recurrence was achieved in two patients with a large pericardial-peritoneal window (4 cm diameter) and effusion recurred in another with a small pericardial-peritoneal window (3cm diameter). No complications were encountered. The pericardial-peritoneal window, approached subxiphoidally, is a simple, safe, and effective procedure and applicable in most patients with non-infectious benign pericardial effusion. We herein describe our techniques, clinical characteristics, and the results for three patients undergoing this treatment.
A simple technique to protect the internal mammary artery pedicle from injury in reoperative sternotomies is described. It consists of a pericardial window created by two pericardial flaps with displacement of the mammary pedicle away from the midline.