Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Patient Freedom of Choice Laws”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

[Free choice of doctors - an international comparison].

The focus of this international comparison concerning the issue of free choice among primary care physicians and specialists is to learn from experiences in other countries. Two different types of health care systems are analysed: state-administered health systems such as in Finland and Great Britain or competition-based systems such as in Switzerland and the USA. In the countries outlined mentioned and other OECD nations (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development) not described in this study, several restrictions of free choice among physicians can be observed. Restrictions are to be found when changing the general practitioner as well as in first contact to specialists. Both limitations do not seem to have a significant effect on the level of satisfaction of the population with health care in general. From an international perspective free choice of doctors seems to be an exception in health systems.

Cross-Cultural Comparison↗
PubMed2002

[Risks, chances and perspectives of restricting the free choice of doctors by patients].

Population surveys regarding free access to primary care physicians and medical specialists focus on selected aspects of public opinion. They are helpful but not sufficient in answering the relevant question: 'What are appropriate and efficient ways of access to the health care system?'. More important than survey results would be options for practical decisions by the patients themselves, based on a system offering different possibilities of choice. Competent piloting by 'gatekeepers' would need a problem- oriented and patient-centred medical education for primary-care physicians, starting during medical education and training and continuing throughout the professional medical careers. It should focus on three additional issues: New, alternative and unbiased ways of access to medical care should be developed, tried and evaluated to ensure beneficial use of the full potential of our health care system.

Forecasting↗
PubMed2002

The relationship of restrictions on state hospitalization and suicides among emergency psychiatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the relationship between mandated decreases in transfers to a state hospital from a large urban psychiatric emergency facility and the occurrence of suicide in the catchment area served. METHODS: During 1996, new admission criteria that emphasized psychiatric diagnosis and potential benefit from hospitalization and that restricted the admission of recidivistic patients and of those with a primary diagnosis of a substance use disorder were phased in. Data on the number of patients seen in a psychiatric emergency service and the number transferred to the state hospital were obtained for the period 1994-1998. Data on all completed suicides in the county served by the hospital were also obtained. RESULTS: During 1994 and 1995, a total of 9,308 patients were transferred to the state hospital. In 1997 and 1998, a total of 4,072 patients were transferred. The number of patients seen in the emergency service remained constant throughout the study period. No change was noted in the absolute number or the rate of suicide in the county after the new admission criteria were implemented. A total of 164 suicides were recorded in 1994-1995 (12 per 100,000 population per year), compared with 152 in 1997-1998 (ten per 100,000 population per year). CONCLUSIONS: Transfers to the state hospital were reduced by 56 percent, with no change in the suicide rate. This finding suggests that the availability of inpatient psychiatric hospitalization may not have a direct effect on the suicide rate.

Emergency Service, Hospital↗
PubMed2002

Health plan responses to managed care regulation.

Little effort has been made to understand operational responses of health plans to the cascade of regulation imposed on them in the past decade. Using data from the Community Tracking Study, we cast some light on this area and illustrate how regulatory initiatives have produced both intended and unintended consequences. The findings both confirm speculation about regulatory effects and reveal some surprising and troubling developments.

Government Regulation↗
PubMed2003

Finance issue brief: direct access: year end report-2003.

Consumer demand for a less restrictive referral system has urged legislators, as well as the managed care industry and those in the medical field, to seek the best solution to the problem. The point of service (POS) plan was an early attempt by managed care plans to provide more freedom for enrollees. But POS plans are not always available or cost effective. Several of the larger managed care organizations, in an effort to improve enrollee and provider satisfaction, have eliminated or streamlined their referral processes. The American Medical Association has recommended that primary care and other medical specialty organizations collaborate in developing guidelines for specialty referrals, urging health plans to allow direct access in network without financial penalty as long as the access conforms with the established guidelines. In the meantime, legislators have responded to constituents by enacting measures that mandate direct access for specific types of care or standing referrals for ongoing treatment.

Gatekeeping↗
PubMed2003

Finance issue brief: freedom of choice: year end report-2003.

Should managed care plans have the ability to limit an individual's "freedom of choice" when it comes to selecting a provider? As part of the anti-managed care movement of the early 1990s, 22 states enacted freedom of choice laws; the majority apply only to pharmacies.

Delivery of Health Care↗
PubMed2002

Finance issue brief: freedom of choice: year end report-2002.

Should managed care plans have the ability to limit an individual's "freedom of choice" when it comes to selecting a provider? As part of the anti-managed care movement of the early 1990s, 22 states enacted freedom of choice laws; the majority apply only to pharmacies.

Forecasting↗
PubMed2002

[Free choice of doctors in Germany in retrospect].

Due to discussions on the cost and quality of health care and a new legislation on the German statutory sickness insurance system in 1999, the free choice of doctors has recently become topical. To assess its legitimation for the German health care system, its history and the groups of interest involved should be taken into consideration. Before the period of industrialization no homogeneous pattern of the medical profession existed. In case of illness individuals who lived within reach and were known for their competence in disease matters were approached. However, industrialization destroyed existing social networks, and establishment of new structures of health care in rural as well as metropolitan areas became necessary. The government approached this challenge by structuring medical education, passing regulations on the settlement of doctors and promoting the foundation of statutory sickness funds. The Health Insurance Law of 1883 established a mandatory insurance system for a broad array of industries. As it was the sickness funds' responsibility to provide sufficient resources for medical care, a sick member was tied to the physician under contract with his insurance. After a rapid increase in practising physicians at the end of the 19(th) century, doctors' organisations were eager to gain access to the new market segment of insurance members by calling for the free choice of physicians. The Leipzig association (Hartmannbund) was founded in 1900 to organize strikes of doctors in order to get their goals accepted. After 30 years of conflicts an appeasement was achieved by a presidential emergency law in 1931. It transferred the responsibility for the provision of sufficient health care resources from the sickness funds to the newly created body of the Association of Sickness Fund Physicians (Kassenärztliche Vereinigung) and determined the patients' free choice among licensed sickness fund physicians.

Germany↗