Patient education handout #60. Patient's library. Whole-body CT scans.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A patient education handout is a potentially powerful tool for communicating information to patients. Patients will derive the greatest benefit from what they can easily read and understand. This article describes the use of computerized readability formulas in writing patient education handouts. Suggestions are offered for writing such handouts are illustrated.
Printed health educational materials, such as patient information handouts, booklets, pamphlets, and information sheets are among the most common and extensively used teaching tools (Rankin & Stallings, 1996). In this article, the author reports (1) the readability of patient information handouts developed by the nursing division and (2) the effect on the patient-teaching task force members of instruction on the readability of patient information handouts at a 79-bed community hospital in Southern Ontario.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Millions of dollars are spent annually on the production and distribution of patient education materials; however, there are no studies describing their actual use by physicians. Using qualitative data from a large comparative case study, our analysis evaluates how patient education materials are organized and used in family practices. METHODS: Eighteen purposefully selected family medicine practices were directly observed for 4 to 12 weeks each. A total of 57 providers were shadowed by a research nurse, and detailed field notes on 1600 patient encounters were recorded. A 3-member analysis team reviewed the qualitative data and identified emergent patterns. RESULTS: Clinics' use of patient education materials fell mostly into 2 distinct patterns. "Stockpilers" were providers who relied on the clinic staff to develop and organize a common library of patient education handouts. Providers with a "personal stash" collected much smaller numbers of materials that they personally maintained. Providers in the latter group had a known repertoire of a limited amount of educational material and used it more often than providers with access to a greater variety and number of handouts. In all practices, providers distributed most handouts; staff and self-selection by patients played a minor role. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that provider involvement and familiarity with patient education materials are key to their use in clinical practice. Clinicians use written patient education materials most efficiently by personally selecting and maintaining a small number of handouts that address topics most relevant to their practice.
The demand for patient education, both from patients themselves and from accreditation agencies for health and managed care organizations, is becoming more insistent. This article outlines the components of a system that maintains a library of computer-based patient education handouts that can be quickly integrated into a physician's practice.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of an alternative prenatal care program for low-risk patients. STUDY DESIGN: Five hundred forty-nine low-risk pregnant women were allocated to the study and control groups. The study group received, on average, eight visits, all of them with one of nine study providers. Each study visit had specific objectives and accompanying targeted patient education handouts. The control group received the usual prenatal care (on average, 13 visits) with different providers, according to the customary schedule. RESULTS: There were no significant pregnancy outcome differences between the groups. The study vs. control group differed significantly (P < .0001) in patient satisfaction regarding the number of prenatal visits. There was a higher level of satisfaction in the study group concerning continuity of care (P < .0001). The alternative prenatal care program reduced the number of prenatal visits by 27% and was not associated with any change in maternal or perinatal outcomes. Patient satisfaction parameters were either maintained or improved with alternative prenatal care. CONCLUSION: An alternative prenatal care program for low-risk patients reduced resource utilization without adversely affecting prenatal care process variables, pregnancy outcome or patient satisfaction.
BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, the immunization rate among preschool children has decreased, especially in the lower socioeconomic population. During this period, reports of outbreaks of immunizable diseases, especially pertussis and measles, have correspondingly increased. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of a brief patient education encounter with new mothers on pediatric immunization rates. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-eight mothers and infants were assigned to an intervention or control group. On the first day postpartum, the mothers in the intervention group participated in a 10- to 15-minute discussion on the importance of immunizations and were given a patient education handout. A reminder letter was mailed to the intervention group at 2 months postpartum. The control group received no special intervention. Infants were followed for their 2- and 4-month immunizations for diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus and oral polio vaccine (DPT/OPV). At 1 year of age, the infants' immunization records were assessed for the completion of their first three DPT/OPV immunizations. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference, by chi-square analysis, in the immunization rates of the control and intervention groups at 2, 4, or 12 months of age. At 1 year of age, 29 of 122 (24%) of the control group had received all three DPT/OPV immunizations, compared with 33 (28%) of 116 infants in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Concordant with similar studies, the immunization rate among infants of parents of lower socioeconomic status (26%) is low. An educational intervention presented to mothers in the postpartum period did not improve the rate of immunization by the age of 12 months. There are undoubtedly several reasons for this failure. Other means to improve immunization rates of infants should be developed and tested.
OBJECTIVES: To describe clinicians' behavior regarding firearm safety counseling practices, develop a model to predict current counseling behavior, and identify resources that might positively influence willingness to counsel according to medical guidelines. DESIGN: Four hundred sixty-five primary care Los Angeles County, California, pediatricians, family physicians, and pediatric nurse practitioners who serve families with children aged 5 years and younger received mailed questionnaires; 325 (70%) responded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinician self-reported behavior. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 80% stated that they should counsel on firearm safety; only 38% do so. Of those clinicians who currently counsel, only 20% counsel more than 10% of their patient families. Firearm safety counseling behavior is positively associated with a clinician being 49 years or younger (odds ratio [OR]=2.19, P=.02); a perception that counseling is beneficial (OR=2.62, P=.02); and household handgun ownership (OR=2.47, P=.02). Clinician households that report gun ownership counsel differently than those clinicians who report not possessing a household gun. There are no significant differences in the rates of counseling across specialties and crime area types. Forty-one percent of clinicians report that patient education handouts would increase their likelihood of counseling. CONCLUSIONS: In Los Angeles County gaps exist between clinicians' views of the benefits of counseling families with young children regarding firearm safety and their actual behavior. Guidelines and handouts are available from major medical organizations. Research should focus on how to get practitioners to use available materials, enabling them to better adhere to guidelines.
This paper analyzes the profile of the Brazilian output in the field of multiple sclerosis from 1981 to 2004. The search was conducted through the MEDLINE and LILACS databases, selecting papers in which the term "multiple sclerosis" was defined as the main topic and "Brazil" or "Brasil" as others. The data were analyzed regarding the themes, the state in Brazil and institution where the papers were produced, the journals where the papers were published, journal's impact factor, and language. The search disclosed 141 documents (91 from MEDLINE and LILACS, and 50 from LILACS only) published in 44 different journals (23 of them MEDLINE-indexed). A total of 111 documents were produced by 17 public universities, 29 by 3 private medical schools and 1 by a non-governmental organization. There were 65 original contributions, 37 case reports, 20 reviews, 6 PhD dissertations, 5 guidelines, 2 validation studies, 2 clinical trials, 2 chapters in textbooks, 1 Master of Science thesis, and 1 patient education handout. The journal impact factor ranged from 0.0217 to 6.039 (median 3.03). Of 91 papers from MEDLINE, 65 were published by Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. More than 90% of the papers were written in Portuguese. São Paulo was the most productive state in the country, followed by Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais and Paraná. Eighty-two percent of the Brazilian output came from the Southeastern region.
Many studies have been conducted about dietary interventions aimed at preventing cancer. The American Cancer Society has published guidelines on diet, nutrition and cancer prevention, which are updated periodically as new evidence emerges, and other groups, too, have issued statements or guidelines about nutritional strategies to prevent cancer. Much less is known, however, about optimal nutrition for cancer survivors. This report looks at the different phases of cancer survivorship, from active treatment to advanced disease, and presents existing evidence from which informed decisions can be made regarding dietary choices. Popular complementary and alternative methods related to dietary intervention are reviewed. Nutrition information is also provided according to common cancer sites. As this is an area that requires survivors and health care providers to communicate effectively, a special section on "frequently asked questions" is provided for use as a patient education handout.
End-of-life care is slowly being recognized as a dimension of primary care. Although terminal care programs have been established largely in response to the needs of cancer and AIDS patients, few clinical guidelines exist for end-of-life care in other diagnostic categories. Hospice philosophy and the palliative care literature provide the grounds for designing primary care approaches for a variety of noncancer, terminally ill patients. A growing need for hospice/palliative care exists for end-stage Alzheimer's patients. This article describes end-stage Alzheimer's disease and proposes ways a primary care provider may participate in the terminal care process. A patient education handout discussing end-stage Alzheimer's disease issues and providing family resources is presented.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.