Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Palate, Hard”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Results of randomized controlled trial of soft palate first versus hard palate first repair in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes for primary repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate, operating on the soft palate first versus the hard palate first. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The Regional Cleft Service of West Nepal. PATIENTS: Forty-seven consecutive patients with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate, of whom 37 were assessed 4 to 6 years after completing primary surgical repair. INTERVENTIONS: Primary repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate by two differing sequences: (1) soft palate repair, with hard palate and lip repair 3 months later; and (2) lip and hard palate repair, followed by the soft palate repair 3 months later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis of dental study models, weight gain, and speech recordings. RESULTS: Four to 7 years after completing the cleft closure, there was no significant difference in facial growth between the two types of repair sequencing. Completing posterior repair first had no effect on anterior alveolar gap width. It narrowed the hard palate gap by reducing the intercanine distance. Anterior repair dramatically closed the anterior alveolar gap, and narrowed the intercanine distance. Comparing anterior alveolar gap width with age at first presentation demonstrated that there was no spontaneous narrowing of the cleft in older children. Completing posterior closure first had a weight gain advantage over anterior closure first. Improved oropharyngeal closure, and thus swallowing, is the likely explanation. CONCLUSION: Changing the sequencing of cleft closure has no demonstrable difference in facial growth at 4 to 7 years after completion of the primary surgery.

Asian People↗
PubMed1988

Articulation proficiency and error pattern of cleft palate children with delayed hard palate closure.

Prior to 1982, children with cleft palate received delayed hard palate closure at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. In this treatment, soft palate is usually repaired with Widmaier palatoplasty at about 18 months with surgery; hard palate is not closed until the age of 6 or 7. Our previous study indicated that the articulation skill of the cleft palate children before delayed hard palate closure is generally far inferior to the non-cleft children of the same age. Further investigation was carried out to look into the articulation proficiency and error patterns of the cleft palate children undergoing delayed hard palate closure. Data of 47 children (32 boys, 15 girls) were analyzed. Articulation proficiency was compared in four phoneme categories: nasals, plosives, fricatives and affricates. The results indicated that affricates are most difficult for Chinese cleft palate children to pronounce. At age 5, just before the hard palate closure, none of the phonemes is produced correctly except nasals.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1990

[Speech outcome after early or delayed hard palate closure].

Delayed hard palate closure (after age 6-7) was widely used for palatal repair in cleft palate children from 1976 to 1982. Since 1982, the approach has been revised into early complete closure of the soft and hard palate (before age 2). The articulation skills of 60 children with cleft lip and palate (age 3-5:11) who underwent early complete palate closure were compared with 47 children of similar age with soft palate closure only. The results indicated that the early complete closure group had more children with adequate articulation skills than the delayed hard palate closure group. Detailed analysis of the articulation patterns in each group revealed that the articulation substitution patterns made by the early complete closure group followed the trends of developmental articulation patterns, i.e. unaspirated, stopping and fronting phonological features. On the contrary, the articulation substitution patterns made by the delayed hard palate closure group were more related to structural deficits, i.e. compensatory articulation. Age 3-5 is a critical period for articulation maturation. We advocate that the complete palatal closure should be achieved before age 2 in order to equip cleft palate children with an equally normal oral structures to enhance speech/language development in a normal learning process during this critical period.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1992

Eyelid reconstruction with hard palate mucosa grafts.

Hard palate mucosa grafts are an excellent replacement for tarsus and conjunctiva in eyelid reconstruction. Twenty-five eyelids from 18 patients underwent eyelid reconstruction using hard palate mucosa grafts. Patients were treated for a variety of disorders including postblepharoplasty lower eyelid retraction, cicatricial entropion, eyelid retraction secondary to thyroid eye disease, and lagophthalmos following surgery for paralytic ptosis. Surgical results were evaluated, grafts were measured for postoperative shrinkage, and donor site healing was recorded. Several patients had hard palate biopsy specimens evaluated. One of these patients also had a graft biopsied after it had been in place for 3 months. A review of hard palate anatomy and histology and a discussion of surgical technique are presented.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of babbling and speech at pre-speech level, 3, and 5 years of age in children with cleft lip and palate treated with delayed hard palate closure.

Babbling and speech in 21 children with cleft palate were compared at pre-speech level, 3, and 5 years of age. The aims were to study if misarticulations in pre-school speech appear to be articulatorily related to the sound productions in pre-speech, whether the feeding technique influenced the prevalence of anterior articulation, and if there was a relationship between speech and the size of the residual cleft at 3 and 5 years of age. All the children had the soft palate closed, whereas the cleft in the hard palate was left open to be closed later on. Perceptual judgement of speech revealed a high prevalence of hypernasality, nasal escape and retracted oral articulation of dental or alveolar plosives. The latter was correlated with the size of the residual cleft area. There was a tendency towards a relationship between absence of anterior sound productions in babbling and retracted oral articulation in speech. The feeding technique, however, appeared not to have had any influence on articulatory place.

Articulation Disorders↗
PubMed1998

Speech outcome after cleft palate surgery with the Göteborg regimen including delayed hard palate closure.

The regimen for treatment of children with cleft lip and palate in Göteborg, Sweden, until 1996 included early soft palate repair at 6-8 months of age and delayed closure of the hard palate at about 8 years of age to improve maxillary growth. The aims of this report were to describe the treatment concept and to present speech data of 59 children treated by this method. The speech of 38 children with unilateral and 21 with bilateral cleft lip and palate was evaluated perceptually from standardised tape recordings of repeated sentences and spontaneous speech at five ages from 3 to 16 years of age. All patients were not evaluated at each age level. The results showed a low prevalence of hypernasality after hard palate closure and pharyngeal flap surgery in only five children (8%), indicating a primary velopharyngeal insufficiency in less than 10% of the children. Only three children with bilateral clefts had glottal articulation when at pre-school age and no child with a unilateral cleft did. These results were interpreted as an indication of velopharyngeal competence (VPC) in most of the children. In addition, the speech problem found in these children consisted of retracted oral articulation of alveo-dental pressure plosives, which is almost always an indicator of VPC. However, we do consider that retracted oral articulation is a problem and to improve our results further we have decided to modify the technique for soft palate closure slightly and place the vomer flap further anteriorly to encourage narrowing of the cleft in the hard palate, and to close the hard palate at 3 years of age.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

[Comparative study of the palatal rugae and shape of the hard palatal in Japanese and Indian children].

The materials for study were serial upper jaw plaster casts of 58 Japanese (29 boys and 29 girls) aged 3 to 7 years, and 93 Indians (46 boys and 47 girls) aged 5 to 8 years. I observed and measured the palatal rugae, the papilla incisiva and the shape of the hard palate using the method of Yamazaki, following Lysell's and Hauser's. The differences according to population (1-5), palatal findings (6) and sex (7) are summarized as follows. 1. The number of primary rugae of Japanese children were more than those of Indian children, but the number of transverse palatal rugae were the same. 2. There were differences between Japanese and Indian children in the primary rugae shapes, the posterior limit of the rugae zone, the number and position of the secondary rugae and fragmentary rugae. 3. The papilla incisiva of the Japanese children were a little larger than those of the Indians. Generally the papilla incisiva of the two populations were pear-shaped, but the Indians showed more variability. 4. The palatal raphe of the Japanese were wider than those of the Indians. The number of children with no palatal raphe branch was large for Indian children, but small for Japanese. 5. The frontal view of the hard palate of Japanese children was broad and that of Indian children was narrower than the Japanese. The palatal shape of the two populations was almost trapezoid. The occlusal view of the two populations was broad and U-shaped. 6. There were many transverse palatal rugae in the two populations at the left side. The posterior limit of the ruga zone of the left side was shifted further back than the right side. 7. There were no significant differences between sexes for most of the above points.

Child↗
PubMed1997

Distraction osteogenesis for lengthening of the hard palate: Part II. Histological study of the hard and soft palate after distraction.

To correct velopharyngeal incompetence, a new treatment concept was proposed in Distraction Osteogenesis for Lengthening of the Hard Palate: Part I (using lengthening of the hard and soft palate by distraction osteogenesis). Cephalometry and computed tomography showed successful elongation of the posterior hard palate with gradual calcification. Here the sequential use of fluorochrome markers (oxytetracycline, xylenol orange, DCAF [2,4-bis-N-N'-dicarboxymethyl aminomethyl fluorescein], and alizarin complexone) during the distraction and retention period is reported together with the histologic investigations using light and laser scan microscopy without prior demineralization. The experimental gap showed de novo osteogenesis in all dogs. The new bone was always in continuity with the original anterior and posterior palatal bone margins. It either bridged the experimental gap fully or left a small central zone of fibrous tissue, in which eventual ossification occurred. Several distinct zones could be distinguished: A small central zone was found with parallel strains of collagen fibers, oriented longitudinally in the direction of the distraction. Next to this zone a layer of undifferentiated mesenchymal precursor cells was seen in direct contact to newly formed bone. The next zone was coarse woven bone, showing a transition to mature lamellar bone through remodeling. No evidence of endochondral bone formation was found, i.e., all dogs showed exclusively intramembranous bone formation. The soft tissues showed no signs of alteration: in particular, there was no necrosis or scar formation. The soft tissues were not thinned but appeared to have followed the longitudinal displacement. In conclusion, gradual distraction osteogenesis of the hard palate could be a possible method for lengthening the palate to treat velopharyngeal incompetence.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Speech development in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with different delays in closure of the hard palate after early velar repair: a longitudinal perspective.

We wanted to find out if different timing of delayed repair of the hard palate in a two-stage procedure had an impact on the speech of 26 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). The soft palate was closed at the age of 7 months and the hard palate between 38 and 89 months of age. Speech audio recordings at the age of 3 years (baseline, before any repair of the hard palate) and at the ages of 5, 7, and 10 years (the latter obtained at least one year after closure) were analysed. We used standardised speech assessments at routine follow-up and assessment by one external listener. The prevalence of speech errors caused by the cleft was similar to those described in previous reports from our centre in which hard palate repair was delayed. Unexpectedly, the results showed no difference in speech production related to timing of hard palate repair, except for nasal air leakage at the age of 7 years.

Age Factors↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A new method for strengthening palatal closure defects of the hard palate.

Closure of minor defects in the hard palate can be done with local flaps. There is often a risk of perforation of the reconstructed area. In the case reported this complication was obvious due to a large, thin, flap-covered area. In strengthening the reconstruction fascia lata and Surgicel was used. The postoperative result was excellent and the rehabilitation of the patient was without complications.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed2006

Maxillary dental arch and occlusion in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with different delays in closure of the hard palate after early velar repair.

We wanted to find out if growth of the maxilla in 26 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) was adversely affected by having the residual cleft of the hard palate repaired earlier than had been done previously in a 2-stage palatal closure protocol. The ages at repair of the hard palate of the present patients ranged from 38 to 89 months. Dental casts from ages about 3 years (before any repair of the hard palate), 5, 7, and 10 years of age were analysed. The results indicated that earlier repair of the cleft in the hard palate did not influence maxillary growth differently from the later repair.

Child↗
PubMed1990

Cleft lip and palate patients prior to delayed closure of the hard palate: evaluation of maxillary morphology and the effect of early stimulation on pre-school speech.

Speech and maxillary development were analysed in two groups of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate; both groups had early jaw orthopaedic treatment and a surgical regimen that included two-stage lip surgery (mean ages of 2 and 19 months) and soft palate repair (8 months). Closure of the hard palate was postponed until the children were 8 to 10 years of age. The first group comprised 10 consecutive patients who were analysed at 5 and 7 years of age, and the second group seven patients who were studied at the age of 5. Both groups were thus investigated before the repair of the cleft in the hard palate. In addition to surgical and jaw orthopaedic treatment, the second group of patients received early stimulation of lip and tongue tip movements. Our results indicated that hypernasality was less a problem than was retracted palatal or velar articulation of dental consonants. These deviations tended to be reduced, however, after early stimulation. There seemed to be no clear association between the size of the residual cleft in the hard palate and the extent of speech development. The average size of the residual cleft in our patients was comparatively small, and decreased further during follow up. We conclude that preschool children with unilateral cleft lip and palate may develop good speech, in spite of the residual cleft, if they use an intraoral plate and are given extra lip and tongue tip stimulation, together with early speech therapy if necessary.

Child↗
PubMed2002

A comparison of three methods of repairing the hard palate.

OBJECTIVE: To compare growth, speech, and nasal symmetry outcomes of three methods of hard palate repair. PATIENTS: Consecutive available records of children born with unilateral bony complete cleft lip and palate over the period 1972 to 1992. INTERVENTIONS: Identical management of lip, nose, alveolus, and soft palate. Hard palate repair by Cuthbert Veau (CV) from 1972 to 1981, von Langenbeck (vL) from 1982 to 1989, or medial Langenbeck (ML) from 1989 to 1991. OUTCOME MEASURES: For growth: GOSLON yardstick or 5-year model index. For speech: articulation test. Nasal anemometry. For nasal symmetry: Coghlan computer-based assessment. All these measures were developed during the period of data collection but not for this project. RESULTS: There was a strong trend toward more favorable anteroposterior maxillary growth with the change from CV to vL to ML techniques. This fell short of statistical significance because of the small sample size. There was a significant reduction in cleft-related articulation faults (p =.01) considered to be related to improved arch form. In the absence of improved rates of velopharyngeal insufficiency or nasal symmetry, increased surgical experience was discounted as a significant contribution to improved growth and articulation outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced periosteal undermining and residual exposed palatal shelf from CV to vL to ML improved incisor relationships and articulation.

Child↗
PubMed1987

Facial morphology and occlusion at the stage of early mixed dentition in cleft lip and palate patients treated with delayed closure of the hard palate.

Cephalometric radiographs and dental study casts were analyzed in a group of 23 seven-year-old cleft lip and palate patients, 16 with unilateral and 7 with bilateral cleft. The patients' primary surgical procedures had been completed except for closure of the cleft in the hard palate. For comparison, similar records from another group of patients, 18 with unilateral and 8 with bilateral cleft lip and palate, were studied. In these cases the cleft of the hard palate had been repaired in infancy, using a vomer flap procedure. The results indicated that midfacial growth and dental occlusion of the unilateral cleft sample was significantly better in patients whose closure of the hard palatal cleft had been delayed to the stage of mixed dentition than where repair had been performed with a vomer flap in infancy. No differences were found, however, between similar subgroups with bilateral cleft lip and palate.

Cephalometry↗
PubMed2006

Analysis of dental arch relationships in Swedish unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects: 20-year longitudinal consecutive series treated with delayed hard palate closure.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dental arch relationships for a consecutive series from Goteborg, Sweden, who had delayed hard palate closure. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden. PATIENTS: The dental study models of 104 consecutive unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects. The study cohort was born between 1979 and 1994. Longitudinal records were available at ages 5 (n = 94), 10 (n = 97), 16 (n = 59), and 19 years (n = 46). Five assessors rated models according to the GOSLON Yardstick on two separate occasions each. INTERVENTIONS: These patients had been operated upon according to the Goteborg protocol of delayed hard palate closure (at age 8 years). RESULTS: 85% of subjects were rated in groups 1 and 2 (excellent or very good outcome), 12% were rated in group 3 (satisfactory), and 3% were assigned to group 4 (poor). No patients presented in Group 5 (very poor). Weighted kappa statistics for double determination of Yardstick allocation for five assessors demonstrated values between .65 and .90 for interrater agreement (good/very good) and between .70 and .90 for intrarater agreement (very good). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed hard palate closure as practiced in Goteborg since 1979 has produced the best GOSLON Yardstick ratings in a consecutive series of patients ever recorded worldwide, since the Yardstick was first used in 1983. However, it is noteworthy that a new protocol has been introduced in Goteborg since 1994, in which hard palate closure is done at 3 years due to concerns regarding speech.

Adolescent↗