Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PROMETHAZINE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Horseradish peroxidase-catalyzed sulfoxidation of promethazine and properties of promethazine sulfoxide.

Promethazine sulfoxide was obtained with a quantitative yield in a horse radish peroxidase-catalyzed reaction of promethazine and hydrogen peroxide and was also prepared by direct chemical synthesis. The enzymatic sulfoxidation of promethazine was studied in vitro as a function of pH, promethazine, and hydrogen peroxide concentration. Promethazine sulfoxide inhibits with an apparent K(i) of 59.7 microM at pH 5.5 the enzymatic reaction, followed spectrophotometrically, polarographically, potentiometrically, and luminometrically. The reaction was also inhibited by ascorbic acid (K(i) 26.8 microM) and glutathione (K(i) 41.8 microM). The spectrophotometric techniques employed, together with ESR spectrometry, allowed the identification of at least three radical species formed in the course of the reaction. Promethazine sulfoxide is devoid of the antioxidant effect exhibited by promethazine on rat brain synaptosomes. The sulfoxide also lacks photosensitizing action, while retaining the neuroleptic effect of the parent compound.

Animals↗

Irreversible binding with biological macromolecules and effects in bacterial mutagenicity tests of the radical cation of promethazine and photoactivated promethazine. Comparison with chlorpromazine.

The irreversible binding of the radical cation of promethazine (PMZ+.) to DNA and protein in vitro and bacterial macromolecules in situ has been studied. Binding experiments were performed with synthesized [35S] promethazine. The results are compared to those with the chlorpromazine radical cation (CPZ+.). Secondary reaction products which result from fission of the alkylamino side chain are involved in the macromolecular binding of PMZ+. Compared to CPZ+. the covalent DNA binding of PMZ+. is significantly less. A larger amount of PMZ+. binds to single-stranded DNA than to double-stranded DNA. The extent of binding to proteins and RNA is of the same order as that of CPZ+. Bacterial mutagenicity tests show that the low genotoxicity of PMZ+. is related to the low DNA binding. The bacterial cytotoxicity is possibly related to the covalent protein binding. Similar results have been obtained with photoactivated promethazine (PMZ) and chlorpromazine (CPZ). The role of radical cations in the photosensitization and metabolic activation of phenothiazine drugs is discussed.

Animals↗

Influence of promethazine on immune reactions. I. Characterization of promethazine effects on natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

Promethazine has been shown to possess definite immunosuppressive activity in clinical and experimental organ transplantation. However, there are few data concerning the mechanism of its influence on immune reactions. In the present studies promethazine was shown to inhibit natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro. Combined analysis of 51Cr-release and single-cell assays revealed that this agent affects some processes involved in delivering the 'lethal hit' but not the binding of target cells nor the recycling capacity of effector cells. The possible mechanism of promethazine action at the cellular level is discussed.

Cells, Cultured↗

NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Promethazine Hydrochloride (CAS No. 58-33-3) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Gavage Studies).

Promethazine hydrochloride is a drug used for the management of allergic conditions, motion sickness and nausea, and as a sedative to (treat psychiatric disorders. This drug was nominated for testing by the Food and Drug Administration because of its widespread use in human medicine and because of lack of data on its potential carcinogenicity. Oral administration is the most common route of human exposure. Toxicology and carcinogenicity studies were conducted by administering promethazine hydrochloride (>99% pure) in distilled water by gavage to groups of male and female F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice for 16 days, 13 weeks, or 2 years. Genetic toxicology studies were conducted in Salmonella typhimurium, in cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells, and in Drosophila melanogaster. 16-DAY STUDY IN RATS: Groups of five male and five female rats received 0, 18.5, 55.5, 166.5, 500, or 1,500 mg promethazine hydrochloride/kg body weight once daily, 5 days per week for a total of 12 doses in a 16-day period. All rats receiving 1,500 mg/kg, four males and four females receiving 500 mg/kg, and one male and one female receiving 166.5 mg/kg died during the study. No deaths occurred in the remaining dose groups. Final mean body weights of rats receiving 166.5 mg/kg were significantly lower (12% to 25%) than those of the controls. Clinical findings included decreased activity, ocular discharge, and labored breathing in males and females receiving 166.5, 500, and 1,500 mg/kg as well as tremors in females receiving 166.5 and 500 mg/kg. There were dose-related increases in the absolute and relative liver weights of rats. Focal suppurative inflammation occurred in the nose of some male and female rats receiving 55 or 166.5 mg/kg and in the trachea of some male and female rats receiving 166.5 mg/kg. 16-DAY STUDY IN MICE: Groups of five male and five female mice received 0, 18.8, 37.5, 75, 150, or 300 mg promethazine hydrochloride/kg body weight once daily, 5 days per week for a total of 12 doses in a 16-day period. Two females receiving 75 mg/kg, one male and one female receiving 150 mg/kg, and four females receiving 300 mg/kg died during the study. No deaths occurred in the remaining dose groups. Final mean body weights of mice receiving promethazine hydrochloride were similar to those of the controls. However, in male and female controls, the final mean body weights were 11% to 12% lower than the initial mean body weights. Clinical findings occurred as early as the first day of the study and included decreased activity in male and female mice receiving 150 and 300 mg/kg. Tremors occurred in one male and five females in the 300 mg/kg group on day 1 and in one male in the 150 mg/kg group and five males and one female in the 300 mg/kg group on day 2. Absolute and relative liver weights of male mice receiving 75, 150, or 300 mg/kg were significantly greater than those of the controls. No chemical related lesions were present in male or female mice. 13-WEEK STUDY IN RATS: Groups of 10 male and 10 female rats received 0, 3.7, 11.1, 33.3, 100, or 300 mg promethazine hydrochloride/kg body weight once daily, 5 days per week for 13 weeks. One female receiving 100 mg/kg and six males and nine females receiving 300 mg/kg died during the study. No deaths occurred in the remaining dose groups. Final mean body weights of male rats receiving 100 or 300 mg/kg were significantly lower (19% to 22%) than those of the controls. Mean body weight gain of females receiving 100 mg/kg was significantly lower (14%) than that of the controls. Clinical findings in rats included hunched posture and labored breathing. Absolute and relative liver weights of males receiving 11.1, 33.3, 100, or 300 mg/kg and females receiving 33.3 or 100 mg/kg were significantly greater than those of the controls. Focal suppurative inflammation of the nose and trachea occurred with an increased incidence in rats receiving 100 and 300 mg/kg. A dose-related increased incidence of vacuolar degeneration of the nasal olfactory epithelium occurred in male and female rats that received 11.1, 33.3, or urred in male and female rats that received 11.1, 33.3, or 100 mg/kg. 13-WEEK STUDY IN MICE: Groups of 10 male and 10 female mice received 0, 5, 15, 45, 135, or 405 mg promethazine hydrochloride/kg body weight once daily, 5 days per week for 13 weeks. One control female, one female receiving 5 mg/kg, two females receiving 45 mg/kg, four females receiving 135 mg/kg, and all mice receiving 405 mg/kg died during the study. No deaths occurred in the remaining dose group. Final mean body weights of mice receiving 135 mg/kg were significantly lower (8% to 9%) than those of the controls. Clinical findings of toxicity included labored breathing and decreased activity in one 135 mg/kg female. Absolute and relative liver weights increased in a dose-related trend in both sexes. No chemical-related lesions were observed in mice. 2-YEAR STUDY IN RATS: Based on mortality and body weight differences observed at higher levels, doses of promethazine hydrochloride selected for the 2-year study in rats were 0, 8.3, 16.6, and 33.3 mg/kg. Groups of 60 male or 60 female rats were administered promethazine hydrochloride in deionized water by gavage once daily, 5 days per week for up to 103 weeks. Up to ten male and ten female rats per dose group were evaluated at 15 months. Survival, Body Weights, and Clinical Findings: There was a significant dose-related decrease in survival of rats. The survival rates in the 16.6 and 33.3 mg/kg male groups and in the 33.3 mg/kg female group were significantly lower than those of the controls. The final mean body weight of male rats receiving 33.3 mg/kg promethazine hydrochloride was 10% lower than that of the controls. Final mean body weights of female rats in the 16.6 and 33.3 mg/kg groups were 9% and 11% lower than that of the controls, respectively. No chemical-related clinical findings were noted in any dose group. Significant increases in the absolute and relative liver weights of mid- and high-dose female rats and the relative liver weights of mid- and high-dose male rats were observed at the 15-month interim evaluation. There were no biologically significant differences in the hematology or clinical chemistry parameters measured at 15 months. Pathology Findings: No neoplasms that could be attributed to promethazine hydrochloride administration were found in male or female rats. Several neoplasms occurred with a significantly decreased incidence in rats receiving promethazine hydrochloride. These included adrenal medullary pheochromocytoma (benign or malignant) and pituitary gland adenoma in the 33.3 mg/kg males and uterine stromal polyp in the 33.3 mg/kg females. The decreased incidences of adrenal medullary pheochromocytoma were chemical related. The decreased incidences of pituitary gland adenoma and uterine stromal polyp may have been related to chemical administration. Diffuse fatty change of the liver of male rats increased with dose and was attributed to chemical administration. 2-YEAR STUDY IN MICE: Based on mortality and body weight differences observed at higher levels, the doses of promethazine hydrochloride selected for the 2-year study were 0, 11.25, 22.5, and 45 mg/kg for male mice and 0, 3.75, 7.5, and 15 mg/kg for female mice. Groups of 60 male or 60 female mice were administered promethazine hydrochloride in deionized water by gavage once daily, 5 days per week for up to 103 weeks. Up to 10 male and 10 female mice per dose group were evaluated at 15 months. Survival, Body Weights, and Clinical Findings: Survival of mice receiving promethazine hydrochloride was similar to that of the controls. Mean body weights of mice were within 7% of those of the controls throughout the study. There were no chemical-related clinical findings in male or female mice. There were no differences in hematology or clinical chemistry parameters measured at 15 months that were attributed to the administration of promethazine hydrochloride. Pathology Findings: There were no neoplasms or nonneoplastic lesions that were attributed to the administration of promethazine hydrochloride. GENETIC TOXICOLOGY: Promethazine hydrochloride did not induce gene mutations in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97, TA98, TA100, TA1535, or TA1537, or a significant increase in chromosomal aberrations in cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells; both of these tests were conducted with and without exogenous metabolic activation (S9). A small dose-related increase in sister chromatid exchanges was observed in cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence of S9; this response was considered to be equivocal. No increase in sister chromatid exchanges was observed in the absence of S9. Promethazine hydrochloride did not induce sex-linked recessive lethal mutations in germ cells of male Drosophila melanogaster administered the chemical by feeding or injection. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of these 2-year gavage studies, there was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of promethazine hydrochloride in male or female F344/N rats receiving 8.3, 16.6, or 33.3 mg/kg. There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of promethazine hydrochloride in male B6C3F1 mice receiving 11.25, 22.5, or 45 mg/kg. There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of promethazine hydrochloride in female B6C3F1 mice receiving 3.75, 7.5, or 15 mg/kg. The decrease in the incidences of adrenal medullary pheochromocytoma in male rats was considered to be related to promethazine hydrochloride administration. The decrease in the incidences of pituitary gland adenoma in male rats and uterine stromal polyp in female rats may have been related to promethazine administration. Synonyms: Phenothiazine,10-(2-(dimethylamino)propyl)-,monochlorohydrate; 10H-phenothiazine-10-ethanamine;10-(2-dimethylamino-2-methylethyl)phenothiazine hydrochloride; N-(2 -dimethylamino-2 -methyl)ethylphenothiazine hydrochloride Trade names: Diprazi; Kinetosin; Phenergan; Phenergan hydrochloride; Promine; Pipolfen; Plletia; Prorex; Promantine; Pyrethia; Romergan hydrochlonde

Journal Article↗

Magnesium sulfate and promethazine do not interact to cause hypotension in gravid ewes.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether magnesium sulfate and promethazine interact to cause hypotension in gravid ewes. Fifteen experiments were performed in five chronically instrumented animals between 125 and 130 days of timed gestation (term = 145 days). In one group of experiments each animal received magnesium sulfate (4 gm intravenous bolus followed by 4 gm/hr intravenous infusion) then promethazine (50 mg intravenously). In a second group each animal received magnesium sulfate then saline solution as a control. In a third group each animal received saline solution then promethazine. Infusion of magnesium sulfate increased the mean (+/- SEM) serum magnesium concentration to 5.7 +/- 0.6 and 6.6 +/- 0.6 mg/dl in the magnesium sulfate-promethazine and magnesium sulfate-saline solution groups, respectively. Magnesium sulfate slightly decreased maternal mean arterial pressure (p less than 0.05) and increased cardiac output (p less than 0.05) in both the magnesium sulfate-promethazine and magnesium sulfate-saline solution groups. Otherwise there were no significant changes in maternal mean arterial pressure or cardiac output in any group. Promethazine increased maternal heart rate (p = 0.0001) in both the magnesium sulfate-promethazine and saline solution-promethazine groups. Magnesium sulfate increased uterine blood flow (p less than 0.01) in both the magnesium sulfate-promethazine and magnesium sulfate-saline solution groups, but promethazine blunted the increase in uterine blood flow associated with magnesium sulfate. Similarly, magnesium sulfate decreased uterine vascular resistance (p less than 0.01) in both the magnesium sulfate-promethazine and magnesium sulfate-saline solution groups, but promethazine eliminated the decrease in uterine vascular resistance associated with magnesium sulfate. Maternal and fetal arterial blood gas and acid-base values did not change in any group, except that there was a small, near-significant decrease (p = 0.06) in fetal pH 10 minutes after promethazine was given in the magnesium sulfate-promethazine group. We conclude that magnesium sulfate and promethazine did not interact to cause maternal hypotension in normovolemic gravid ewes. However, promethazine increased maternal heart rate and blunted the increase in uterine blood flow associated with magnesium sulfate.

Animals↗

Promethazine adverse events after implementation of a medication shortage interchange.

BACKGROUND: Prochlorperazine and droperidol were commonly used antiemetics at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian Hospital until a shortage of prochlorperazine occurred and a black box warning was added to droperidol prescribing information. Subsequently, promethazine was selected as the approved intravenous antiemetic for therapeutic interchange in December 2001. Promethazine use and adverse drug events (ADEs) were investigated following review of a serious ADE that identified promethazine use as a probable contributing factor. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate ADEs associated with promethazine and characterize high-risk patients. METHODS: An ADE database analysis identified promethazine ADEs reported from 2000 to 2003. Promethazine utilization and ADEs were compared with those of other antiemetics during the pre- and post-interchange periods. RESULTS: Promethazine utilization increased significantly during the post-interchange period compared with all other antiemetics (p < 0.001). Promethazine ADEs increased from one event during the pre-interchange period to 13 events during the post-interchange period. Causality assessment using the Naranjo algorithm ranged from possible to probable. The promethazine ADE rate per 10 000 doses was significantly higher than the combined ADE rate for all other antiemetics (p < 0.001; incident rate ratio [IRR] 4.32). Elderly patients (aged > or =65 y) experienced more promethazine ADEs than younger patients (p = 0.005; IRR 4.68). Concurrent use of opioids and/or sedating drugs contributed to promethazine ADEs in 11 of 14 (78.6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric status is a significant risk factor for promethazine ADEs. Concomitant use of sedating drugs may further increase the risk for ADEs. Therapeutic interchange programs should be monitored for both ADEs and utilization.

Adult↗

Endogenous opioids, mu-opiate receptors and chloroquine-induced pruritus: a double-blind comparison of naltrexone and promethazine in patients with malaria fever who have an established history of generalized chloroquine-induced itching.

AIMS: Chloroquine induces a severe generalized pruritus, in predisposed Black African patients, during treatment of malaria fever, and also in some Caucasian patients treated for rheumatological diseases. We have previously shown that chloroquine may release endogenous opioids and/or interact with micro-opiate receptors in rats, and that both histamine and malaria parasite blood density, contribute to the itching severity in malaria fever in humans. The aim of our present study was to assess and compare the antipruritic efficacy of the micro-opiate receptor antagonist, naltrexone, and the antihistamine, promethazine, in chloroquine treated patients with malaria fever. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, parallel group comparison of the chloroquine-induced pruritus intensity and time profile in patients with parasitologically proven malaria fever, who were pretreated with a single dose of either naltrexone 50 mg or promethazine 25 mg orally (six patients each). All patients had an established history of severe pruritus following chloroquine treatment of malaria fever. A self-assessed itching severity score was undertaken at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after initial chloroquine dosing, and the areas under the pruritus-intensity time curve AUCP0-72 h was determined in each patient and correlated to the malaria parasite density in blood. RESULTS: Both naltrexone and promethazine subjectively reduced itching severity compared with prior historical experience. One patient on naltrexone and two on promethazine never experienced any itching. There was no statistically significant treatment effect, but a significant time effect (P = 0.001, F = 4.77 d.f. 5) by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. The AUCP for naltrexone was 82 +/- 25 units/h, and 57 +/- 34 units/h for promethazine [95% confidence interval for the difference being -73 to 123]. However, the malaria parasite density in the naltrexone group (740 +/- 178 microl(-1)) tended to be higher than in the promethazine group 314 +/- 69 microl(-1) (P = 0.056, 95% confidence interval for the difference being -15 to 866 microl(-1)). Correction of the AUCP for malaria parasite density (parasite pruritogenic index, AUCP. units/h/parasites/microl blood) tended to be lower with naltrexone 9.1 +/- 2.6 than with promethazine 12.2 +/- 7.0 There was a highly significant and positive correlation between the malaria parasite density and the AUCP0-72 h, on naltrexone (r2 = 0.78, P = 0.040) and promethazine (r2 = 0.93, P = 0.008). However, comparison of regressions revealed that the slope of the regression was significantly steeper with promethazine 0.48 than naltrexone 0.12 (P = 0.006, t = 4.2), with the intercepts showing a trend to a difference (P = 0.086). CONCLUSION: Naltrexone exerted an antipruritic action, at least to a similar extent to promethazine in patients with chloroquine-induced itching in malaria fever. However, the relationship between parasite density and resultant pruritus was significantly different between naltrexone and promethazine. Thus, micro-opiate receptors/and or endogenous opioids may contribute to chloroquine itching in malaria fever, in humans, in accord with animal experimental findings. Malaria parasite density in blood is a strong determinant of itching severity in patients predisposed to chloroquine-induced pruritus.

Administration, Oral↗

Promethazine affects autonomic cardiovascular mechanisms minimally.

Promethazine hydrochloride, Phenergan, is a phenothiazine derivative with antihistaminic (H1), sedative, antiemetic, anticholinergic, and antimotion sickness properties. These properties have made promethazine a candidate for use in environments such as microgravity, which provoke emesis and motion sickness. Recently, we evaluated carotid baroreceptor-cardiac reflex responses during two Space Shuttle missions 18 to 20 hr after the 50 mg intramuscular administration of promethazine. Because the effects of promethazine on autonomic cardiovascular mechanisms in general and baroreflex function in particular were not known, we were unable to exclude a possible influence of promethazine on our results. Our purpose was to determine the ground-based effects of promethazine on autonomic cardiovascular control. Because of promethazine's antihistaminic and anticholinergic properties, we expected that a 50-mg intramuscular injection of promethazine would affect sympathetically and vagally mediated cardiovascular mechanisms. Eight healthy young subjects, five men and three women, were studied at rest in recumbency. All reported drowsiness as a result of the promethazine injection; most also reported nervous excitation, dry mouth, and fatigue. Three subjects had significant reactions: two reported excessive anxiety and one reported dizziness. Measurements were performed immediately prior to injection and 3.1 +/- 0.1 and 19.5 +/- 0.4 hr postinjection. We found no significant effect of promethazine on resting mean R-R interval, arterial pressure, R-R interval power spectra, carotid baroreflex function, and venous plasma catecholamine levels.

Adult↗

Interaction of carbamazepine and promethazine in rabbits.

The interaction of carbamazepine and promethazine in rabbits has been investigated. The influence of this interaction on the processes of biotransformation in the liver was revealed. The drugs were administered as single oral doses (100 mg of each drug) as well as simultaneously with an interval of 15 min. The sequence of administration of the drugs was varied. The influence of promethazine on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine is expressed by: (a) strong suppression of carbamazepine's level in plasma and appearance of multiple peaks of carbamazepine; (b) suppression of biotransformation of carbamazepine into carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide at the initial stages and its increase in the intermediate stages. These data are explained by the active capture of carbamazepine by liver at its primary transferal through the liver and sufficient presystem elimination of carbamazepine in the presence of promethazine. The character of kinetic curves of promethazine varies substantially under the influence of carbamazepine. However, this change is not as strong as in case of carbamazepine. The concentration of promethazine in plasma varies slightly and multiple peaks are not observed. The rate of terminal elimination of promethazine varies and abrupt prolonged segments of elimination appear at the initial and terminal stages of the process in return. These data perhaps indicate the induction of biotransformation of promethazine in the presence of carbamazepine-an inductor of microsomal liver enzymes. The changes of kinetics of promethazine and carbamazepine by simultaneous administration as compared with their administration separately, as well as a comparative consideration of pharmacokinetics of promethazine and carbamazepine by simultaneous administration show the existence of competition in the elimination between these drugs and the periodic saturation of liver for their biotransformation.

Animals↗

In vitro and in vivo reversal of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum with promethazine.

The effect of combining promethazine with chloroquine was examined against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro in the Aotus-P. falciparum model and in bioassays from volunteers given promethazine. The combination of chloroquine plus promethazine (1 x 10(-6) M) reversed chloroquine resistance in standard P. falciparum clones and patient parasite isolates from Nigeria. The combination reduced the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) for chloroquine against resistant parasites by 32-92%. Coadministration of promethazine with chloroquine also demonstrated a dose-dependent effect in Aotus monkeys infected with chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum. Monkeys were given a chloroquine dose (20 mg/kg of body weight for seven days), which normally has no effect on parasitemia, plus 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg of promethazine/kg of body weight. In one monkey, parasitemia was suppressed at the lowest promethazine dose, but re-treatment with 20 mg/kg resulted in clearance of parasitemia. Initial treatment with chloroquine and 20 or 40 mg/kg of promethazine cleared parasitemia in some animals followed by recrudescence. Re-treatment at higher doses cured one monkey and resulted in initial clearance and delayed recrudescence 28 or 63 days after treatment in two monkeys. Recrudescent parasitemia in the two monkeys was low (10 parasites/microl of blood) and subsequently cleared without re-treatment. An in vitro bioassay model was developed to examine the effects of clinically achievable doses of promethazine on parasites susceptibilities in vitro. Plasma samples taken at hourly intervals from patients given a single oral dose of 25 mg of promethazine decreased the IC50 values for chloroquine by 20-58% with the most significant reductions occurring in plasma obtained from volunteers 3-4 hr after ingestion. Plasma obtained from two volunteers 6 hr after ingestion of the drug demonstrated no effect on chloroquine susceptibility, suggesting that study of the pharmacokinetic disposition and potential interaction is warranted to optimize the dose regimen in patients for antimalarial efficacy. Historic use of this drug combination for treatment or prevention of chloroquine-associated pruritus or as an antiemetic suggest that the combination is safe and effective when used at standard dosages. The results from this study demonstrate that promethazine is a potent modulator of chloroquine resistance. Clinical evaluation of therapeutic regimens is required to validate clinical efficacy of this promising combination for treatment of uncomplicated chloroquine-resistant malaria.

Adult↗

Autogenic-feedback training exercise is superior to promethazine for control of motion sickness symptoms.

Motion sickness symptoms affect approximately 50% of the crew during space travel and are commonly treated with intramuscular injections of promethazine. The purpose of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of three treatments for motion sickness: intramuscular injections (i.m.) of promethazine, a physiological training method (autogenic-feedback training exercise [AFTE]), and a no-treatment control. An earlier study tested the effects of promethazine on cognitive and psychomotor performance and motion sickness tolerance in a rotating chair. For the present paper, motion sickness tolerance, symptom reports, and physiological responses of these subjects were compared to matched subjects selected from an existing database who received either AFTE or no treatment. Three groups of 11 men, between the ages of 33 and 40 years, were matched on the number of rotations tolerated during their initial rotating-chair motion sickness test. The motion sickness test procedures and the 7-day interval between tests were the same for all subjects. The drug group was tested under four treatment conditions: baseline (no injections), a 25 mg dose of promethazine, a 50 mg dose of promethazine, and a placebo of sterile saline. AFTE subjects were given four 30-minute AFTE sessions before their second, third, and fourth motion sickness tests (6 hours total). The no-treatment control subjects were only given the four rotating-chair tests. Motion sickness tolerance was significantly increased after 4 hours of AFTE when compared to either 25 mg (p < 0.00003) or 50 mg (p < 0.00001) of promethazine. The control and promethazine groups did not differ. AFTE subjects reported fewer or no symptoms at higher rotational velocities than subjects in the control or promethazine groups. The primary physiological effect of promethazine was an inhibition of skin conductance level. The AFTE group showed significantly less heart rate and skin conductance variability during motion sickness tests administered after training.

Adult↗

Pulmonary and systemic vascular response to promethazine in conscious lambs.

Promethazine is an antihistamine commonly used for sedation in clinical pediatric medicine. We studied the cardiovascular effects of promethazine in normoxic, conscious, chronically instrumented neonatal lambs. Eight lambs received 1.3 mg/kg of promethazine intravenously (i.v.) while at rest. In all lambs, promethazine led to elevations of pulmonary vascular resistance, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, mean transpulmonary pressure, mean left atrial pressure, and the ratio of pulmonary-to-systemic vascular resistance. In addition, five (63%) of the lambs demonstrated an increase in mean systemic arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance to promethazine. A subgroup of three lambs, which tended to be younger, failed to demonstrate the systemic vascular response to promethazine. Promethazine given i.v. has important cardiovascular effects. We hypothesize that promethazine used for sedation before cardiac catheterization in children may alter subsequent hemodynamic observations.

Animals↗

Study of the stability of promethazine enantiomers by liquid chromatography using a vancomycin-bonded chiral stationary phase.

Three chiral stationary phases based on macrocyclic antibiotics (teicoplanin, vancomycin and ristocetin A) have been tested for chiral separations of promethazine. The vancomycin phase permits the best, baseline enantioseparation of promethazine, with a mobile phase of a 80:20 (v/v) mixture of methanol with a 1% aqueous triethylamine acetate buffer of pH 4.1 and with the analysis time not exceeding 15 min. The limits of detection amount to 27.5 and 31.0 ng/ml for the earlier and later eluting enantiomers, respectively. This separation system, that also permits a sufficient resolution between the promethazine enantiomers and their degradation products, has further been used for the monitoring of the effects of light, temperature and the promethazine concentration in solution on the stability of methanolic promethazine solutions over a period of 19 days. It has been found that the stability of more concentrated solutions is primarily affected by the temperature, whereas the effects of the temperature and light are comparable with more dilute solutions. After 19 days, a solution of 0.5 mg/ml promethazine stored in darkness at a low temperature still contained 84.0% of the original amount of the enantiomers; this value was 89.6% for a solution with the ten times lower promethazine concentration. If the solutions were stored in darkness but at laboratory temperature, the respective values decreased to 38.1 and 62.6% and for the solutions exposed to light at laboratory temperature they decreased even more to 36.7 and 52.6% of the initial promethazine amount.

Calibration↗

Pharmacokinetics of promethazine and its sulphoxide metabolite after intravenous and oral administration to man.

Blood concentrations of promethazine and promethazine sulphoxide have been measured following oral and intravenous administration of promethazine to seven healthy male volunteers. Promethazine disposition is characterised by a large volume of distribution (1970 1) and a high blood clearance (1.141 min-1). Less than 1% of the dose is excreted unchanged in the urine, therefore total body clearance is essentially metabolic clearance. In accord with this high clearance the oral availability of promethazine is only 25%. The absorption of promethazine from the gastrointestinal tract exceeds 80% in most subjects. Minimal metabolism by the gastrointestinal mucosa is implicated. Promethazine sulphoxide pharmacokinetics are consistent with a pronounced first pass effect. Although the area under the curve for this metabolite is not route dependent, there is a marked alteration in the shape of the metabolite curve when oral and intravenous data are compared. Evidence is presented to support the hypothesis that S-oxidation of promethazine is predominantly an hepatic event. The conclusions of previous investigators with regard to the role of the gut mucosa in S-oxidation of phenothiazines is critically assessed.

Administration, Oral↗

Effect of promethazine on lumbar vertebral bone mass in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVES: Work in mice suggests that the age-related loss of bone mineral noted in that species is caused by an intrinsic defect in a haematopoietic cell population which results directly or indirectly in increased bone resorption. This age-related loss of bone mineral is prevented or reversed by well-tolerated doses of promethazine HCL. The present study was undertaken to determine if promethazine would retard or reverse bone loss in postmenopausal women. DESIGN: Postmenopausal women whose spine (L2 to L4) bone mineral content (BMC) was two standard deviations below young normal values were assigned randomly to receive calcium or promethazine and calcium daily. Subjects who had been taking oral oestrogen for more than 4 years also were assigned randomly but independently to the calcium or promethazine groups. SETTING: All subjects were seen in the out-patient clinic of the Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles. SUBJECTS: Healthy, ambulatory postmenopausal females were recruited by word of mouth and by advertisement from the local community. Fifty-four subjects completed the first 6 months of the study and 43 completed 30 months. INTERVENTIONS: The subjects were assigned randomly to receive 1000 mg calcium daily or promethazine 50 mg and calcium 1000 mg daily throughout the period of the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bone mineral content of the lumbar vertebrae (L2 to L4) was determined by dual photon densitometry every 6 months. Dorsolumbar spine X-rays were obtained yearly and at the completion of the study to detect new compression fractures. RESULTS: In the groups not taking oestrogen, BMC decreased at the rate of 1.53% year-1 in the group given only calcium; in contrast, BMC increased at 3.22% year-1 in the group given promethazine and calcium (P < 0.001). Among the women taking oestrogen, increases in mean BMC were noted in both groups, but those taking promethazine and calcium had a greater rate of increase than observed in the group taking only calcium (5.62% vs. 1.97% per year-1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that promethazine can induce a modest increase in vertebral BMC in postmenopausal women who are not taking oestrogen and greater increases in those who are.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗