TaqI and PvuII restriction fragment length polymorphisms at the porcine plasminogen activator, urokinase, locus (PLAU).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify and validate robust prognostic biomarkers for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with a specific focus on the high-risk HPV-negative subtype. METHODS: Integrated bioinformatics analysis was performed on transcriptomic data from four GEO datasets (n = 418 samples). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed for the most dysregulated genes. Key modules were analyzed via survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression. The top candidate genes were validated at the protein level using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in an independent cohort of 304 OPSCC patients. RESULTS: A 33-gene module related to extracellular matrix organization showed significant prognostic association. It stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups with markedly different overall survival (HR = 2.71, p < 0.001). From this module, SPP1 and PLAU were identified as independent prognostic factors through multi-step screening. Both genes were significantly overexpressed in tumors (approximately 20-fold and 10-fold, respectively, p < 0.001), with high expression strongly correlated with advanced tumor stage (p < 0.01) and, notably, the HPV-negative subtype (p < 0.001). In survival analysis, high expression of either SPP1 or PLAU was associated with poorer overall survival (SPP1: p < 0.001; PLAU: p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (p < 0.001). IHC validation confirmed high protein expression in 69.7% (SPP1) and 54.8% (PLAU) of cancer tissues. A prognostic nomogram integrating the SPP1/PLAU signature with clinical variables was constructed with strong predictive accuracy (C-index = 0.75). CONCLUSION: The SPP1/PLAU dual-gene signature is a robust and independent prognostic biomarker for OPSCC, with particular clinical utility for stratifying high-risk HPV-negative patients.
Loci homologous to those on human chromosome 10 (HSA10) map to five mouse chromosomes, MMU2, MMU7, MMU10, MMU14, and MMU19. In cattle, one unassigned syntenic group (U26) was previously defined by the HSA10/MMU19 isoenzyme marker glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1 (GOT1). To evaluate the syntenic arrangement of other HSA10 loci in cattle, seven genes were physically mapped by segregation analysis in a bovine x hamster hybrid somatic cell panel. The genes mapped include: vimentin (VIM) on HSA10 and MMU2; interleukin 2 receptor (IL2R) on HSA10 and MMU?; ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) on HSA10 and MMU7; hexokinase 1 (HK1) on HSA10 and MMU10; retinol-binding protein 3 (RBP3) on HSA10 and MMU14; plasminogen activator, urokinase type (PLAU) on HSA10 and MMU14; and alpha-2-adrenergic receptor (ADRA2) on HSA10 and MMU19. VIM and IL2R mapped to U11; ADRA2 and OAT mapped to U26; and RBP3, PLAU, and HK1 mapped to U28.
This study examined the mechanisms underlying the comorbidity between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), while identifying potential therapeutic targets. Common differentially expressed genes (C-DEGs) between T2DM and ASCVD were extracted from the GSE78721 and GSE12288 datasets. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction, hub gene identification, and Drug-Gene Interaction Database (DGIdb) analysis were conducted. The association between hub C-DEGs and immune-infiltrating cells was analyzed using the CIBERSORT method. Expression levels of hub C-DEGs were quantified through qRT-PCR and Western blot analyses. A total of 32 C-DEGs were identified, comprising 20 upregulated and 12 downregulated genes. C-DEGs were predominantly enriched in key pathways, including viral myocarditis, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and dilated cardiomyopathy. PPI analysis revealed 29 nodes and 39 edges, leading to the identification of eight hub C-DEGs (HSP90B1, PLAU, SLPI, TOP3A, NCF4, PRF1, TUBA1C, and CS) across both datasets. Furthermore, hub C-DEGs (TOP3A, SLPI, NCF4, PRF1, and PLAU) demonstrated significant correlations with immune-infiltrating cell levels. Drugs specifically targeting these hub C-DEGs present promising candidates for the treatment of T2DM and ASCVD. Additionally, the expression of hub C-DEGs at both mRNA and protein levels was validated in patients with T2DM and ASCVD. An integrated bioinformatics analysis facilitated the screening of candidate therapeutic targets, mechanisms, and drugs for T2DM and ASCVD, offering new insights into molecular therapies for these conditions.
Genetic alterations of multiple loci that serve as markers for the induction and progression of disease have been identified in several adenocarcinomas, but not in adenocarcinoma of the prostate. To determine if similar genetic alterations occur in prostate carcinoma and could serve as markers for the extent of clinical disease, we have examined 23 predominantly moderately-differentiated, localized prostate carcinomas and one prostatic dysplasia for changes in the structure and copy number of ten selected genes. These genes include 1) those important to androgen metabolism in the prostate, the androgen receptor and steroid 5 alpha reductase genes; 2) those that map to the 10q (PLAU) and 7q (MET) chromosomal regions found deleted in some prostate carcinomas, and 3) proto-oncogenes (ERBB2, INT2, and MYC) and tumor suppressor gene loci (RB1, TP53 and D17S5) found altered in adenocarcinomas of the breast, colon and lung. Gene alterations were detected in one specimen, a lymph node metastasis from a poorly differentiated tumor. This specimen exhibited loss of heterozygosity for two loci putatively active in tumor suppression, TP53 and D17S5, on the short arm of chromosome 17. This study indicates that gross genetic alterations were not evident and could not be used as markers of tumor development in well- or moderately-differentiated, localized lesions, but that loss of the 17p region may be a useful marker for advanced carcinomas in the prostate.
BACKGROUND: HMGA1 is a chromatin-associated oncogenic factor implicated in tumor progression, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), stemness, and metastasis. However, its pan-cancer expression and prognostic patterns, epigenetic activation, and relationship with malignant-cell stemness/plasticity and tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) remain incompletely defined. This study aimed to systematically characterize HMGA1 across cancers and clarify its clinical and biological relevance in PAAD. METHODS: Pan-cancer transcriptomic, clinical, genetic, methylation, immune, and stemness data were integrated from multiple public databases. PAAD single-cell RNA sequencing data were analyzed to localize HMGA1 expression, infer malignant-cell pseudotime, calculate a stemness module score, and assess ligand-receptor communication using CellChat. Public HMGA1-knockdown RNA sequencing data were reanalyzed to evaluate transcriptional remodeling. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-PAAD expression and methylation data were used to assess TME-remodeling, immune-suppression, stemness/plasticity, cytokine/chemokine, checkpoint, and promoter-methylation features. HMGA1 expression and function were further examined using immunohistochemistry (IHC), quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, wound-healing assays, and Transwell migration and invasion assays. RESULTS: HMGA1 was upregulated in most tumor types, and high expression was associated with unfavorable survival in multiple cancers, including PAAD. In PAAD, HMGA1 was enriched in malignant epithelial cells and positively correlated with pseudotime (Spearman's rho =0.594), while the stemness module score increased along pseudotime (rho =0.748). HMGA1-high malignant cells showed markedly stronger CellChat-inferred outgoing communication, predominantly involving extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor, adhesion-related, and selected immunomodulatory ligand-receptor axes. HMGA1 knockdown was associated with broad remodeling of EMT, TGF-β, Hedgehog, IL6/JAK/STAT3, KRAS, and cancer stem cell/stemness-related programs rather than uniform suppression of these programs. HMGA1 promoter methylation was inversely correlated with HMGA1 expression (rho =-0.633) and the TME-remodeling score (rho =-0.347). HMGA1 was associated with selected mediators, including PPIA, PLAU, ANXA1, LGALS9, TGFB1, CD276, and CD47, but not with a generalized checkpoint-high phenotype. Functionally, HMGA1 knockdown significantly reduced pancreatic cancer (PC) cell migration and invasion. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support an association-based model in which promoter hypomethylation-associated HMGA1 activation is linked to malignant epithelial stemness/plasticity, ECM/adhesion-dominant TME remodeling, selected immunomodulatory programs, and aggressive PAAD phenotypes. Further mechanistic and clinical validation is required before HMGA1 can be used for therapeutic stratification or immunotherapy-response prediction.