Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PAIN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

The effects of failure feedback and pain-related fear on pain report, pain tolerance, and pain avoidance in chronic low back pain patients.

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of non-pain-related failure experiences and pain-related fear on pain report, pain tolerance and pain avoidance in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Moreover, the mediating and moderating role of negative affectivity (trait-NA) in the relationship between failure experiences and pain was examined. Seventy-six patients were divided into high and low pain-related fear groups and within each group they were randomly assigned to the failure or success feedback condition. In the first part of the study patients completed a 'social empathy test' and experimenter 1 subsequently delivered false failure or success feedback. A second experimenter, who was blind for the condition, subsequently administered two lifting tasks in order to obtain measures of pain report, tolerance and avoidance. Failure feedback did have an effect on pain avoidance but unexpectedly, and not as hypothesized, pain avoidance was reduced instead of enhanced. With regard to pain report and pain tolerance similar patterns were found, but these were not statistically significant. The effect of failure feedback on pain avoidance was moderated by trait-NA. Only in the subgroup of patients who scored low on trait-NA did failure feedback decrease pain avoidance. State-NA did not mediate the effects of feedback. In line with previous findings, pain-related fear resulted in lower pain tolerance. Moreover, this study was the first to show that pain-related fear predicted higher pain report in CLBP patients. Pain-related fear did not predict pain avoidance when pre-lifting pain and gender were controlled for. Finally, pre-lifting pain turned out to be the strongest predictor with regard to all pain measures. The role of pain-related fear and unexpected findings with regard to feedback are discussed as well as some clinical implications.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2000

Painful pricks and prickle pains: is there a relation between children's ratings of venipuncture pain and parental assessments of usual reaction to other pains?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine whether parental assessment of a child's usual behavioral reaction to common painful events predicts the child's ratings of needle pain intensity from routine venipuncture. DESIGN: Children aged 3 to 12 years (n = 88) used the Faces Pain Scale to rate how much venipuncture hurt and also indicated whether the pain was more, less, or the same as expected. The child's parent (mother) used the same scale to predict how much the needle would hurt the child as well as to rate the child's pain as observed at the time of venipuncture. Parents also estimated their child's usual reaction to six common painful events. An independent observer used a behavioral checklist to rate the child's pain response at the time of venipuncture as well as to assign a global pain rating on the Faces Pain Scale. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Faces Pain Scale and a behavioral checklist (scoring facial, vocal, motor, and verbal reactions) were used in this study. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Those children who reported venipuncture as hurting more than expected also gave the highest mean needle pain ratings and tended to have their pain underpredicted by their parents before venipuncture. For these children, parental estimates of reactions to other painful events proved to be a useful predictor of self-reported needle pain. Parent and child ratings of pain agreed more closely for those parents who indicated having relied on what their child "did" rather than "said." Additionally, and consistent with previous studies, independent observation of children's facial responses was the most useful indicator of needle pain severity. Preparation of children for venipuncture may be enhanced by asking a parent beforehand how the child usually responds to everyday pain. Specifically, reaction to other sharp time-limited pains (e.g., finger pinch, stepping on a prickle) may provide a useful guide to identifying which children will report experiencing greater pain than expected from venipuncture.

Child↗
PubMed1985

The McGill Pain Questionnaire in the assessment of phasic and tonic experimental pain: behavioral evaluation of the 'pain inhibiting pain' effect.

The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), supplemented with a German version, was administered to 10 healthy subjects to evaluate two laboratory pain models. Ischemia pain was induced as a tonic pain model and electrical intracutaneous stimuli were applied as a model of phasic pain. In addition, both pain models were employed simultaneously in order to evaluate their mutual influence. Tonic pain was rated higher than phasic pain on the affective, evaluative and miscellaneous MPQ subscales. Furthermore, the sensory descriptor choices for the two pain models were dissimilar, although the number of words chosen as well as the intensity represented by these words were of equal magnitude. These findings indicate that the sensory quality of the pain models is different and that the aversive component is much greater for the tonic pain than for the phasic pain. When applied simultaneously, tonic pain was able to inhibit phasic pain perception. This modulation could be demonstrated on visual analog scales of intensity (-44%) and aversiveness (-49%), on a 10-point category scale (-27%), and on the MPQ scores present pain intensity (PPI) (-29%), number of words chosen (NWC) (-25%) and pain rating intensity (PRI) (-28%). Differences were significant on the 5% level for the visual analog scales, the category scale and PPI. Evaluation of the MPQ subscales revealed that mainly the affective dimension of phasic pain was reduced under concurrent tonic pain. It is concluded that the MPQ is as well-suited to characterize differential analgesic effects as it is to differentiate properties of pain models.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability.

There is growing evidence for the idea that in back pain patients, pain-related fear (fear of pain/physical activity/(re)injury) may be more disabling than pain itself. A number of questionnaires have been developed to quantify pain-related fears, including the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), and the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS). A total of 104 patients, presenting to a rehabilitation center or a comprehensive pain clinic with chronic low back pain were studied in three independent studies aimed at (1) replicating that pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself (2) investigating the association between pain-related fear and poor behavioral performance and (3) investigating whether pain-related fear measures are better predictors of disability and behavioral performance than measures of general negative affect or general negative pain beliefs (e.g. pain catastrophizing). All three studies showed similar results. Highest correlations were found among the pain-related fear measures and measures of self-reported disability and behavioral performance. Even when controlling for sociodemographics, multiple regression analyses revealed that the subscales of the FABQ and the TSK were superior in predicting self-reported disability and poor behavioral performance. The PASS appeared more strongly associated with pain catastrophizing and negative affect, and was less predictive of pain disability and behavioral performance. Implications for chronic back pain assessment, prevention and treatment are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Prevalence of pain combinations and overall pain: a study of headache, stomach pain and back pain among school-children.

The prevalence of pain combinations among school children is addressed in view of earlier findings of high pain prevalence in this population. The study considers the prevalence of combinations of three common pains headache, stomach pain and back pain-in a random national sample of 2173 Icelandic 11-12 and 15-16 year-old school children. According to the results from this study there is a 78.2% prevalence of monthly pain. One or more instances of weekly pain is experienced by 40.4% of the children, and 15.6% experience two or three pains weekly. Relevance of gender is greater when dealing with combinations of monthly than weekly pain. Combinations of weekly pains are more gender related than single weekly pains. Girls have significantly more frequent overall pain than boys. The distribution of pain combinations varies by age but not overall pain. The study yields important information about the extent of the overall problem of pain among school children and indicates the need to further study the correlates of different pain combinations in this age group.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1996

Relationship of subjective disability with pain intensity, pain duration, pain location, and work-related factors in nonoperated patients with chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: A cross-sectional study on patients with chronic low back pain to compare relationships between subjective disability and pain intensity, pain duration, pain location, and work-related factors. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: One hundred and seven outpatients with low back pain, with or without radiation to the legs, of at least 3 months' duration, were administered a comprehensive back patient questionnaire. The questionnaire included the Pain Disability Index (PDI) for the assessment of overall perceived disability and assessments of pain intensity, duration, and location and two pretested short-form work questionnaires. None of the patients had undergone a back operation. SETTING: Tertiary care center. RESULTS: There was evidence of significant interrelationships between the PDI and pain intensity (low back pain, r = 0.53, p < 0.001; leg pain, r = 0.32, p < 0.01; and buttock pain, r = 0.36, p < 0.01), pain location (significantly higher scores with distal pain radiation), and work-related factors (a work load sum score of r = 0.31, p < 0.01; significantly higher scores in patients on sick leave). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that subjective disability in patients with chronic low back pain overlaps with both pain and work-related factors. The observations support the multidimensionality of low back disability.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Imaging the pain of low back pain: functional magnetic resonance imaging in combination with monitoring subjective pain perception allows the study of clinical pain states.

Most brain imaging studies of pain are done using a two-state subtraction design (state-related design). More recently event-related functional magnetic reasonance imaging (fMRI) has also been used for studying pain. Both designs severely limit the application of the technology to clinical pain states. Recently we demonstrated that monitoring time fluctuations of perceived pain could be used with fMRI to identify brain regions involved in conscious, subjective perception of pain. Here we extend the methodology to demonstrate that the same approach can be used to study clinical pain states. Subjects are equipped with a finger-spanning device to continuously rate and log their perceived pain during fMRI data collection. These ratings are convolved with a canonical hemodynamic response function to generate predictor waveforms with which related brain activity can be identified. Chronic low back pain patients and a normal volunteer were used. In one series of fMRI scans the patient simply lies in the scanner and indicates spontaneous fluctuations of the subjective pain. In other fMRI scans, a straight-leg raising procedure is performed to exacerbate the back pain. In the normal volunteer, fMRI scans were done during painful and non-painful straight-leg raisings. The results indicate the feasibility of differentiating between different pain states. We argue that the approach can be generalized to identify brain circuitry underlying diverse clinical pain conditions.

Brain Mapping↗
PubMed2003

The Zero Acceptance of Pain (ZAP) Quality Improvement Project: evaluation of pain severity, pain interference, global quality of life, and pain-related costs.

The Zero Acceptance of Pain (ZAP) Quality Improvement Project was a multi-site effort to improve the lives of outpatients with cancer pain by enhancing the clinical practice of pain assessment and management. Independent samples of patients completed self-report measures of severity of pain, pain interference, global quality of life, pain treatment satisfaction, general medical treatment satisfaction, pain attitudes, and pain-related medical costs before and after the implementation of ZAP. Results suggested that ZAP decreased the severity of recent pain, decreased interference of pain on daily functioning, and improved satisfaction with pain treatment and attitudes about addiction to opioid medication. Direct medical costs consisting of pain-related hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and physician office visits were greatly reduced. In summary, the findings of this study support the idea that clinic-based efforts to improve the practice of pain management are effective in improving the lives of cancer patients who are experiencing pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Nurse-led pain management program: effect on self-efficacy, pain intensity, pain-related disability, and depressive symptoms in chronic pain patients.

Nurses routinely use a variety of nonpharmacologic and patient education interventions designed to reduce pain and promote independence. Research on group programs that combine these nursing strategies in a systematic approach provides evidence that chronic pain patients can realize an enhanced confidence in their ability to manage pain (improved self-efficacy) in addition to reductions in pain, emotional distress, and disability. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of participating in a nurse-led cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) pain management program on self-efficacy, pain intensity, pain-related disability, and depressive symptoms among patients with chronic pain. Pre- and postprogram data from 154 participants were examined to identify changes in pain intensity, self-efficacy, disability, and depressive symptoms. Mean differences, effect sizes, and 95% confidence intervals were computed for the study variables and paired t-tests were done to determine if changes were significant. Z-scores were then calculated. Pearson product moment correlations were examined to test the association between changes in self-efficacy and changes in the other variables of interest. Patients in this study reported significant improvements in all scores postprogram. Self-efficacy, pain-intensity, pain-related disability, and symptoms of depression can be changed through participation in a nurse-led outpatient CBT program. In concert with results from other research on CBT pain programs this study provides further evidence that reduction in suffering and improved sense of well-being is possible even for people who have experienced pain for many years.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

[Quality control in the therapy of chronic pain. Results obtained by a task force of the German Section of the International Association for the Study of Pain on psychological assessment of chronic pain. XI. Assessment and multiaxial classification of pain].

This paper reviews instruments in German language for the psychological assessment and classification of pain. Usually chronic pain syndromes are classified within the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Instead of the psychiatric chapter of the ICD, it is possible to use the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). The proposed classification system of the International Association of the Study of Pain (IASP) is based on a multiaxial solution. The numerous ways to classify chronic pain include many problems and limits, especially in the case of an interdisciplinary assessment. They provide no specific system for classifying pain syndromes. They are impractical to handle and restrict classifying pain as either somatogenic or psychogenic. It is not possible to describe both sides in one diagnosis without loss of information. As a result of this situation, a task force of the German Chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain developed a Multiaxial Classification of Pain (Multiaxiale Schmerzklassifikation; MASK) as an advanced system of pain assessment and an alternative to the common classification systems. MASK embraces a somatic (MASK-S) and a psychological (MASK-P) part. Both parts constitute an 'interdisciplinary diagnosis'. MASK-S enables classifying a pain syndrome using hierarchical levels, with progredient specific degrees of differentiation. In addition there are 6 axes to describe pain syndromes qualitatively and quantitatively (e.g. localization, quality). The psychosocial part (MASK-P) embraces 5 main levels (1. behavioral, 2. emotional, 3. cognitive, 4. stress-related, 5. habitual personal factors) and 2 additional levels (6. functional coherence, 7. ICD/DSM-diagnosis additional). The MASK-P part of the diagnosis is composed of graduation on these levels. Differential axis of the pain syndromes are described phenomenologically and specifically. MASK provides the possibility of establishing an integrative, interdisciplinary diagnosis.

English Abstract↗
PubMedDate not supplied

American pain society pain questionnaire and other pain measures in the assessment of osteoarthritis pain: a pooled analysis of three celecoxib pivotal studies.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of the American Pain Society (APS) questionnaire in the assessment of osteoarthritis (OA) pain and to determine the onset of action of celecoxib in the treatment of acute flare pain in patients with OA of the knee or hip. Pooled data from three pivotal, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials of patients with OA who exhibited a flare of disease activity after withdrawal of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or analgesic therapy were evaluated. Patients completed the APS Pain Measure Questionnaire, which evaluates pain intensity and quality of life, at baseline and daily for the first 7 days of therapy. In addition, patients underwent a range of standard OA assessments to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of celecoxib up to 12 weeks. Three thousand two hundred fifty-eight patients were enrolled in the three studies, of whom 2041 completed the APS questionnaire (1010 received celecoxib, 513 received naproxen, and 518 received placebo). Within the first 24 hours, celecoxib at a dose of 200 or 400 mg/d significantly reduced the amount of acute pain experienced compared with placebo for four of the five measures, and statistical significance for the remaining parameter, "pain in the last 24 hours," was achieved on day 2. Celecoxib at a dose of 200 to 400 mg/d provided similar efficacy to naproxen at a dose of 1000 mg/d. The pain relief observed with celecoxib was maintained for the APS evaluation period. Long-term efficacy assessments showed the efficacy of 200 mg/d of celecoxib to be continuous and maintained for at least the 12 weeks of the study and that it was equivalent to 400 mg/d of celecoxib and 1000 mg/d of naproxen. This study demonstrates that the APS questionnaire is a useful measure of pain and therapeutic response in OA. Celecoxib furthermore seems to be an effective acute and chronic analgesic in OA.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

[Quality assurance in therapy of chronic pain. Results obtained by a task force of the German Section of the Association for the Study of Pain on psychological assessment of chronic pain. IX. Multidimensional instruments for the assessment of aspects relating to pain and recommendations on standard procedures for diagnosis].

Four multidimensional inventories used as instruments for the assessment of pain are examined: "Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Schmerzverarbeitung' [Questionnaire for Assessment of Level of Coping with Pain], "Kieler Schmerzverarbeitungs-Inventar' [Kiel Inventory of Coping with Pain], "Fragebogen zur Schmerzregulation' [Questionnaire on Pain Regulation], and the German version of the "Multidimensional Pain Inventory'. None of these questionnaires assesses all domains that are important in chronic pain. The recommended standardized assessment routine for pain centres includes the use of a diary, the rating of actual, average and maximum pain intensity, the application of the PDI, a measure of disability, and the FESV, which records cognitive processing and coping. As measures of general psychological dysfunction the ADS for the assessment of depression and the B-L, a symptom checklist, are suggested as instruments suitable for routine use in diagnosis and evaluation.

English Abstract↗
PubMed2003

[Clinical characteristics of children with chronic pain in a pediatric pain unit: oncologic pain versus non-oncologic pain].

BACKGROUND: Despite undoubted scientific advances in the field of chronic pain in children, there is no evidence of clinical application of this knowledge. OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of a pediatric pain unit (PPU) specifically dedicated to the treatment of chronic pain in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed an analytic, observational, retrospective, cohort study of the clinical features of the first 42 patients treated for chronic pain in the PPU during a two-year period. The patients were assigned to two groups: an oncologic group and a non-oncologic group. ANOVA was used to analyze quantitative variables and the Chi-square test was used to analyze qualitative variables. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two groups in the demographic variables studied (age and sex). Concerning the type of treatment used, no significant differences were found in effectiveness or compliance. However, treatment duration was significantly longer in the non-oncologic group than in the oncologic group (74.2 days vs 37.5 days, p(0.008). The duration of non-oncologic chronic pain before attending the PPU (mean: 557 days) influenced the effectiveness (r 5 0.781; p 5 0.0001) and duration of treatment (r 5 0.61; p 5 0.0051). However, the duration of previous chronic oncologic pain was significantly shorter (mean: 34 days) and showed no influence on treatment effectiveness or duration. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric population presents chronic pain syndromes that can be appropriately treated in a PPU with conventional, easy to manage analgesics. We recommend the establishment of pediatric pain units similar to those for adults, using a multidisciplinary approach to mitigate children's suffering.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

[Quality assurance in chronic pain therapy. Results obtained by a task force of the German Chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain on psychological Assessment of chronic Pain. Psychological instruments for the assessment of pediatric pain].

The present paper is one in a series of publications reviewing German instruments for the psychological assessment of pain. Part X deals with pain measurement of acute and chronic pain in infants and children. German assessment instruments of pediatric pain together with frequently used instruments of American origin are examined and described. The survey contains self-report and behavioral pain measures. Multidimensional pain interviews for both children and parents, diaries and rating scales, as well as observation measures especially for infants, are examined. Since the selection of pain-assessment instruments is dependent on the age and cognitive level of the children, for each instrument a minimum age limit is given. In cases in which quantitative indices of reliability, validity and objectivity are still needed, the evaluation is based on qualitative quotations.

English Abstract↗
PubMed1993

Self-control expectancy and postsurgical pain: relationships to previous pain, behavior in past pain, familial pain tolerance models, and personality.

The importance of self-control expectancy on postsurgical pain was studied in 126 patients enrolled in a particular clinical setting. The contribution of previous pain experiences, past behaviors, vicarious experiences, and personality traits to self-control expectancy reported by patients was also investigated. To collect this information, a specific questionnaire and a semistructured interview were given before surgery. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) personality tests were also administered. Postsurgical pain was assessed by measuring intensity (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), latency (hr), and duration (days). Results show that expected emotional coping response is crucially related to the whole pain experience (intensity, latency, and duration). Self-control expectancy is associated with mastery behaviors in previous pains, vicarious experiences, and personality traits. These findings suggest that the knowledge of patients' beliefs about their ability to acquire and maintain control over impending pain is useful in predicting and managing postsurgical pain.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1986

Pain behavior and pain coping strategies in low back pain and myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome patients.

Pain behavior and pain coping strategies were systematically measured in a group of 32 chronic low back pain (LBP) and 32 myofascial pain dysfunction (MPD) syndrome patients. Both groups reported high levels of psychological distress on the SCL-90R. The LBP patients were significantly less active, took more narcotic and sedative-hypnotic medications, and showed higher levels of motor pain behavior (guarding, rubbing, and bracing) than the MPD patients. The LBP patients used attention diversion, and praying or hoping as pain coping skills to a much greater extent than the MPD patients. The relationship of these findings to prior research is described, and future research needs in this area are identified.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1999

An international survey of cancer pain characteristics and syndromes. IASP Task Force on Cancer Pain. International Association for the Study of Pain.

The optimal assessment of cancer pain includes a detailed description of pain characteristics and classification by both syndrome and likely mechanisms. In the clinical setting, the interpretation of this information is aided by knowledge of the available clinical experiences on these aspects of the pain. Unfortunately, existing data are limited. There have been few large surveys of cancer pain characteristics and syndromes, and comparative data from patients in different parts of the world are entirely lacking. To better define the characteristics of cancer pain syndromes the Task Force on Cancer Pain of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) conducted a prospective, cross-sectional, international, multicenter survey of pain specialists and their patients. From a total of 100 clinicians who described themselves as cancer pain practitioners in the IASP membership directory, 51 agreed to participate in the survey and a total of 58 provided data. These clinicians resided in 24 countries and evaluated a total of 1095 patients with severe cancer pain mostly requiring opioid medication, using a combination of patient-rated and observer-rated measures. The patient-rated scales comprised a pain intensity measure chosen from the brief pain inventory. The observer-rated information included demographic and tumor-related data, and responses on checklists of pain syndromes and pathophysiologies. Patients were heterogeneous in terms of demographics and tumor-related information. More than 76% had a Kamofsky performance status score < or = 70. Almost one-quarter of the patients experienced two or more pains. A large majority of the patients (92.5%) had one or more pains caused directly by the cancer; 20.8% of patients had one or more pains caused by cancer therapies. The average (SD) duration of pain was 5.9 (10.5) months. Approximately two-thirds of patients (66.7%) reported that the worst pain intensity during the day prior to the survey was > or = 7 on a 10-point numeric scale. The factors that were univariately associated with higher pain intensity included the presence of breakthrough pain, somatic pain or neuropathic pain, age younger than 60 years, and lower performance status score. A multivariate model suggested that the presence of breakthrough pain, somatic pain, and lower performance status were the most important predictors of intense pain. Pains that were inferred by the treating clinician to be nociceptive and due to somatic injury occurred in 71.6% of the patients. Pains labeled nociceptive visceral were noted in 34.7% and pains inferred to have neuropathic mechanisms occurred in 39.7%. In a broad classification, the major pain syndromes comprised bone or joint lesions (41.7% of patients), visceral lesions (28.1%), soft tissue infiltration (28.3%), and peripheral nerve injuries (27.8%). Twenty-two types of pain syndromes were most prevalent. Large differences in the diagnosis of breakthrough pain by clinicians of different countries suggest that this phenomenon is either defined or recognized differently across countries. These data confirm, in segment of the cancer population experiencing severe pain, in different parts of the world, that cancer pain characteristics, syndromes and pathophysiologies are very heterogeneous. Predictors of worsening pain can be identified. The data provide a useful context for the interpretation of pain-related information acquired in both clinical and research settings. They suggest the need for future studies and the potential usefulness of a written checklist for cancer pain syndromes and pathophysiologies.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗
PubMed2001

Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain.

Research among persons with cancer pain suggests that the association between pain intensity and pain interference is non-linear. That is, pain begins to have a serious impact on functioning when it reaches a certain threshold level (about 5 on 0--10 scales). Often, a second pain threshold can be identified which, once reached, shows an even greater proportional negative impact on functioning. This finding supports the potential clinical utility of classifying pain as mild, moderate, and severe based on the impact of pain on quality of life, and research among persons with cancer pain supports specific cutoffs (mild: 1--4, moderate: 5--6, severe: 7--10, see Pain 61 (1995) 277) for this classification. The current study sought to replicate the non-linear association between pain and pain interference in a non-cancer pain sample, determine whether the cutoffs that have been identified as optimal for cancer patients are also optimal for persons with pain associated with amputation, and determine whether the optimal cutoffs replicate across pain types (in this case, phantom limb, back, and general pain) within a single sample. Two-hundred and five persons with acquired amputation and phantom limb pain, back pain, or both, rated their average pain intensity and degree of pain interference for each type of pain. The results support a non-linear association between pain intensity and pain interference. However, the optimal cutoffs for classifying mild, moderate and severe pain in the present sample replicated the findings for persons with cancer pain only for back pain -- different optimal cutoffs were found for phantom limb and general pain. Moreover, the degree of pain interference appeared to vary as a function of pain type. The same level of back pain interfered more significantly with daily function than phantom limb pain did after pain levels reached five or more (on a 0--10 scale). These findings have implications for understanding the meaning of pain intensity levels, as well as for the assessment of pain intensity in persons with amputation-related pain.

Adult↗