Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ovarian Cancer”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1987

Second malignancies following testicular cancer, ovarian cancer and Hodgkin's disease: an international collaborative study among cancer registries.

Eleven population-based cancer registries tabulated second cancers among 133,411 patients diagnosed with testicular cancer, ovarian cancer or Hodgkin's disease between 1945 and 1984. Overall, 3,157 second cancers were observed, as compared with 2,420 expected at least one year after the first cancer. Survivors of testicular and ovarian cancer experienced 30% and 20% more cancers respectively than the general population comparison group, and patients previously diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease had an 80% excess of cancer. No information was available either on treatment for the first cancer, or other risk factors. However, temporal patterns in the risk of specific second cancers were analysed, with particular reference to the possible role of therapy for the first cancer. Leukaemia of the acute or non-lymphatic type, which has been previously linked to alkylating agent therapy, occurred in excess following all 3 first cancers, as did non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (overall relative risks of 6.1 and 1.8 respectively, with considerably higher relative risks following Hodgkin's disease). Other cancers for which important and plausibly therapy-induced excesses occurred were lung cancer following Hodgkin's disease (relative risk 1.9), breast cancer following Hodgkin's disease (relative risk 1.4) and bladder cancer following ovarian cancer and Hodgkin's disease (relative risks 1.7 and 2.2 in women, respectively). Rarer sites at which striking excesses occurred were the salivary gland, thyroid, bone and connective tissue. There were smaller, but clear excesses for cancers of the rectum and colon following ovarian cancer and testicular cancer, skin cancer following Hodgkin's disease, and kidney cancer following ovarian cancer. Overdiagnosis, misclassification of metastases and confounding by other risk factors were all considered as explanations of observed excesses. Nonetheless, it appeared that there are clear excess risks for cancers other than acute leukaemia which must be ascribed to therapy for the first cancer, especially in view of the possible under-reporting in registry material. Case-control studies are under way to provide information on the role of specific aspects of therapy.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2003

Association between BRCA1 mutations and ratio of female to male births in offspring of families with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, or both.

CONTEXT: Defects in X-chromosome inactivation distort sex ratio in mice. The BRCA1 gene is also involved in X-chromosome inactivation, suggesting the possibility that some sex-ratio distortion may be associated with BRCA1-related human cancer syndromes. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether BRCA1 mutations are associated with distortion of the sex ratio of births in families with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, or both. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of germline mutations in participants from Spain who had been screened for BRCA between 1998 and 2002. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-eight families with at least 3 breast cancer cases or ovarian cancer cases, or both types of cancer in 2 generations (germline mutations: BRCA1, n = 17; BRCA2, n = 15; and BRCA unrelated, n = 36). An average of 4 relatives per family were tested for the corresponding BRCA mutation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Male and female births registered in breast and/or ovarian pedigrees tested for the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. RESULTS: Of BRCA1-related breast and/or ovarian cancer pedigrees, there was a 2-fold excess of female births (218 female vs 109 male births). Of BRCA2-related or BRCA-unrelated breast and/or ovarian cancer pedigrees, there was not an excess of female births (175 female/150 male and 344 female/315 male, respectively). Of 327 BRCA1 births, 218 (67%) were female births compared with 54% among BRCA2 pedigrees (175/327; P<.001) and 52% among BRCA-unrelated pedigrees (344/659; P<.001). Female births increased in the offspring of BRCA1 carriers compared with BRCA2 carriers (67% vs 52%; P =.004). CONCLUSION: In these families with breast and/or ovarian cancer, mutations in BRCA1 but not BRCA2 were associated with a sex ratio skewed against male births.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2003

Expression of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites and their relationship between genetic susceptibility in breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Fragile sites are nonrandomly located gaps and/or breaks and their expres-sion can be induced by specific culture conditions. There are many reports in the literature that indicate that these sites can act as factors that predispose to specific chromosome aberrations and other complex rearrangement in the chromosome and their association with cancers. In the present study, the expression of the fragile sites induced by aphidicolin was evaluated on prometaphase chromosomes from peripheral blood lymphocytes of 55 patients with breast cancer patients belonging to different stages of the cancer, 25 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, and 13 with non-small-cell lung cancer, 100 of their first-degree clinically healthy female relatives, and 100 normal age-matched healthy persons without a familial history of cancer. The frequency of expression of the fragile sites in cancer patients and their first-degree relatives was found to be statistically significant (P<0.05) than those of the controls. In different stages of breast cancer patients, 6q26 is the best-defined fragile site whereas 13q13 is confined to stage II and stage III patients only. The chromosomal aberration rate/cell in breast cancer patients was found to be 0.29+/-0.13, in epithelial ovarian cancer patients 0.38+/-0.14, and in non-small-cell lung cancer 0.29+/-0.11 as compared to 0.07+/-0.03 in controls, and was found to be statistically significant. Therefore, our results indicate that these fragile sites may be the unstable sites in the genome and, hence, can be used as suitable and reliable markers for genetic predisposition to breast cancer, epithelial ovarian cancer, and in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Aphidicolin↗
PubMed2006

[2005 monitoring report: use of positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose in the management of patients with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and uterine cancer].

CONTEXT: The validity of the recommendations is based on their actualisation as well as on the quality of the initial elaboration process. Therefore the "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) from the National French federation of comprehensive cancer centres (FNCLCC) has set up a literature monitoring process. OBJECTIVES: To identify new data, which are likely to modify existing recommendations, evaluate their impact and inform potential users on their validity. METHODS: The monitoring process is based on 3 main steps lead in collaboration with experts: collect data, select and classify information and analyse information. Analysis of information consists of comparing the conclusions of new data with the conclusions of the initial report and then to identify the recommendations that need to be updated. RESULTS: This article presents the 2005 monitoring report concerning "the use of positron emission tomography with FDG in the management of breast cancer, ovarian cancer and uterin cancer". Following the monitoring process,all the existing recommendations (initial report from 2003) are still valid. However three modifications have been proposed by the working group: 1) increased level of evidence concerning the use of PET-scan for suspicion of local or metastatic recurrence (option, level of evidence: A); 2) a new option for the use of PET-scan for revealed cervix cancer recurrence, especially for the therapeutic decision strategy (level of evidence: B2); and 3) new formulation (less strict) of the recommendation concerning the use of PET-scan in the management of endometrial cancer.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

Microsatellite instability and hMSH2 gene mutation in a triple cancer (colon cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer) patient in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) kindred.

A patient who had triple cancer (colon cancer, endometrial cancer, and ovarian cancer) in HNPCC kindred is reported. Her family history revealed the occurrence of colon cancer in her paternal aunt and in two cousins, fulfilling the minimum HNPCC criteria. Microsatellite instability analysis revealed replication error (RER)+ in all cancer lesions at 2 microsatellite loci (D1S191, BAT 40). SSCP analysis suggested germline mutation in exon 2 of the hMSH2 gene. This case showed the importance of complete family-history investigations to identify HNPCC patients. In the near future, definitive diagnosis of HNPCC will be possible on the basis of DNA studies.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Lumpectomy and breast radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with a family history of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, or both.

This article presents an outcomes review of breast cancer patients identified from the cancer registries of four area hospitals. These patients had family histories of breast cancer, ovarian carcinoma, or both and were treated with conservative surgery and radiation to the involved breast. Patients were as follows: group 1, one first-degree relative ( n = 165, one synchronous bilateral breast cancer); group 2, > or =2 first-degree relatives ( n = 21); group 3, one second-degree relative ( n = 20); and group 4, > or =2 second-degree relatives ( n = 18). The total of patients and breast cancer events was 224 and 225, respectively. Group 5 was a subgroup of 53 patients with a substantial risk (>10%) of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. After a median follow-up of 3.9 years, 5 patients had local failure (2%), and 5 developed a contralateral breast cancer (2%). There were no significant differences in local failure rates between groups (p = 1.0): group 1, 5 of 166 (3%); group 2, 0 of 21 (0%); group 3, 0 of 20 (0%); and group 4, 0 of 18 (0%). Local failure for group 5 was 2% (1 of 53). Four of 143 patients (3%) with a minimum 3 years of follow-up (median, 5.6 years) had local failure, and 5 (4%) developed a contralateral breast cancer. A univariate analysis was statistically significant for differentiation only (well, 0 of 67; moderately, 1 of 57 [1.8%]; poor, 3 of 26 [11.5%], p = 0.008). Overall survival for groups 1-4 did not differ significantly. Although follow-up has been relatively short, we have not found that breast cancer patients with various degrees of family histories of breast/ovarian carcinoma have had a detrimental outcome when treated with conservative therapy.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1997

Prevalence and contribution of BRCA1 mutations in breast cancer and ovarian cancer: results from three U.S. population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer.

We investigate the familial risks of cancers of the breast and ovary, using data pooled from three population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer that were conducted in the United States. We base estimates of the frequency of mutations of BRCA1 (and possibly other genes) on the reported occurrence of breast cancer and ovarian cancer in the mothers and sisters of 922 women with incident ovarian cancer (cases) and in 922 women with no history of ovarian cancer (controls). Segregation analysis and goodness-of-fit testing of genetic models suggest that rare mutations (frequency .0014; 95% confidence interval .0002-.011) account for all the observed aggregation of breast cancer and ovarian cancer in these families. The estimated risk of breast cancer by age 80 years is 73.5% in mutation carriers and 6.8% in noncarriers. The corresponding estimates for ovarian cancer are 27.8% in carriers and 1.8% in noncarriers. For cancer risk in carriers, these estimates are lower than those obtained from families selected for high cancer prevalence. The estimated proportion of all U.S. cancer diagnoses, by age 80 years, that are due to germ-line BRCA1 mutations is 3.0% for breast cancer and 4.4% for ovarian cancer. Aggregation of breast cancer and ovarian cancer was less evident in the families of 169 cases with borderline ovarian cancers than in the families of cases with invasive cancers. Familial aggregation did not differ by the ethnicity of the probands, although the number of non-White and Hispanic cases (N = 99) was sparse.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Oral contraceptives and the risk of hereditary ovarian cancer. Hereditary Ovarian Cancer Clinical Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Women with mutations in either the BRCA1 or the BRCA2 gene have a high lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Oral contraceptives protect against ovarian cancer in general, but it is not known whether they also protect against hereditary forms of ovarian cancer. METHODS: We enrolled 207 women with hereditary ovarian cancer and 161 of their sisters as controls in a case-control study. All the patients carried a pathogenic mutation in either BRCA1 (179 women) or BRCA2 (28 women). The control women were enrolled regardless of whether or not they had either mutation. Lifetime histories of oral-contraceptive use were obtained by interview or by written questionnaire and were compared between patients and control women, after adjustment for year of birth and parity. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio for ovarian cancer associated with any past use of oral contraceptives was 0.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 0.8). The risk decreased with increasing duration of use (P for trend, <0.001); use for six or more years was associated with a 60 percent reduction in risk. Oral-contraceptive use protected against ovarian cancer both for carriers of the BRCA1 mutation (odds ratio, 0.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 0.9) and for carriers of the BRCA2 mutation (odds ratio, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Oral-contraceptive use may reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with pathogenic mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists Group.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian carcinoma is the seventh most common cancer of women in the world and is responsible for the greatest number of deaths from gynaecological malignancy in Europe and North America. Although many studies have explored the use of chemotherapy in this disease, most individual trials have been too small to show clear benefit of one type of chemotherapy over another. OBJECTIVES: The type and intensity of chemotherapy used routinely for women with advanced ovarian cancer has varied because of uncertainty about the effectiveness of the different regimens. The objective of this review was to compare single drugs versus combinations of drugs, platinum versus non-platinum, and carboplatin versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: Search strategy: We searched MEDLINE, and CancerLit bibliographic databases and the National Cancer Institute and the UK Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research registers of trials. We also handsearched the proceedings of meetings and contacted experts in the field and drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of: (1) single non-platinum versus non-platinum combination chemotherapy (2) single non-platinum versus platinum combination chemotherapy (3) non-platinum regimen versus the same regimen plus cisplatin (4) single platinum versus platinum combination chemotherapy (5) cisplatin versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Individual patient data were obtained from the trial investigators, checked by the reviewers and finally verified by the trial investigator. MAIN RESULTS: Main results: 49 trials involving 8763 women were included. The data were combined to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for survival on an intention-to-treat basis. For single non-platinum versus platinum combination chemotherapy the overall HR for survival was 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.05 in favour of platinum-based combination chemotherapy. For non-platinum regimens compared with the same regimen plus cisplatin the survival HR was 0.88, 95% CI 0.79- 0.98 in favour of the addition of platinum to drug regimens. Single platinum compared with platinum combination therapy gave a HR of 0.91, 95% CI 0.79-1.05 in favour of combination chemotherapy. Cisplatin versus carboplatin gave a HR of 1.02, 95% CI 0.93-1.12. Sub-group analyses for age, stage, grade, histology, resection, bulk of residual tumour and performance status were undertaken for cisplatin versus carboplatin only. No difference in effect was found. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence, although not conclusive, suggests that platinum-based chemotherapy is better than non-platinum therapy. There is some evidence that combination therapy improves survival compared with platinum alone. No difference in effect has been shown between cisplatin and carboplatin.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2000

Pharmacoeconomic considerations in treating ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death in women with gynaecological cancers. The most common type of ovarian cancer is epithelial ovarian cancer. Referred to as the 'silent' killer, this disease is difficult to detect because of the lack of specific symptoms. The majority of women who have ovarian cancer are diagnosed in the advanced stages. While the exact cause of ovarian cancer remains elusive, it is believed that the events relating to incessant ovulatory function play a major role in the development of this disease. Long term prognosis of women with ovarian cancer remains grim. Although ovarian cancer is highly responsive to chemotherapy, most women will develop persistent or recurrent disease after primary treatment. The standard front-line treatment is paclitaxel in combination with a platinum-based agent; however, toxicities associated with paclitaxel must be weighed against the clinical benefit. The economic issues associated with the treatment of ovarian cancer involve costs of chemotherapy agents and management of supportive care. Patient preferences and quality-of-life issues are also of major importance because of the short survival benefit for most patients. Therefore, quality of life must be maximised alongside efforts to prolong survival. More research is necessary to determine what trade-offs (e.g. adverse effects of treatment) patients are willing to make for modest gains in survival.

Female↗
PubMed2000

Survival in epithelial ovarian cancer patients with prior breast cancer.

Ovarian cancer patients who carry germ-line BRCA1 mutations may have improved survival compared with ovarian cancer patients without these mutations. To evaluate this hypothesis, the authors compared survival in ovarian cancer patients who had a history of prior breast cancer with that of patients without such a history. Specifically, they used data from the population-based US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program to assess time to death from ovarian cancer among ovarian cancer patients with and without a prior breast cancer. All 25,637 White women diagnosed with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer in SEER registries between 1973 and 1995 were included. Of these, 824 women had had a prior breast cancer diagnosis. The ovarian cancer death rate among women with prior breast cancer was significantly lower than that of women with ovarian cancer only, adjusted for age and stage at ovarian cancer diagnosis. The survival advantage was most pronounced among older women and among those whose ovarian cancers were more advanced at the time of diagnosis. These results lend indirect support to prior findings of improved ovarian cancer survival in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Familial ovarian cancer].

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal disease in gynecological malignancy. Approximately 5-10% of cases are thought to have a hereditary basis, and family history is the strongest risk factor for the development of the disease. Familial ovarian cancer occurs as a part of three clinically distinct syndromes, site specific ovarian cancer families, breast ovarian cancer families, and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome II) families. The breast ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are reported to account for around 50% of familial ovarian cancer families. In this paper, we describe the contribution of ovarian cancer susceptibility genes to familial ovarian cancer, and clinical features of ovarian cancer patients with germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2.

BRCA2 Protein↗
PubMed2006

Expression profiling identifies altered expression of genes that contribute to the inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta signaling in ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer is resistant to the antiproliferative effects of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta); however, the mechanism of this resistance remains unclear. We used oligonucleotide arrays to profile 37 undissected, 68 microdissected advanced-stage, and 14 microdissected early-stage papillary serous cancers to identify signaling pathways involved in ovarian cancer. A total of seven genes involved in TGF-beta signaling were identified that had altered expression >1.5-fold (P < 0.001) in the ovarian cancer specimens compared with normal ovarian surface epithelium. The expression of these genes was coordinately altered: genes that inhibit TGF-beta signaling (DACH1, BMP7, and EVI1) were up-regulated in advanced-stage ovarian cancers and, conversely, genes that enhance TGF-beta signaling (PCAF, TFE3, TGFBRII, and SMAD4) were down-regulated compared with the normal samples. The microarray data for DACH1 and EVI1 were validated using quantitative real-time PCR on 22 microdissected ovarian cancer specimens. The EVI1 gene locus was amplified in 43% of the tumors, and there was a significant correlation (P = 0.029) between gene copy number and EVI1 gene expression. No amplification at the DACH1 locus was found in any of the samples. DACH1 and EVI1 inhibited TGF-beta signaling in immortalized normal ovarian epithelial cells, and a dominant-negative DACH1, DACH1-Delta DS, partially restored signaling in an ovarian cancer cell line resistant to TGF-beta. These results suggest that altered expression of these genes is responsible for disrupted TGF-beta signaling in ovarian cancer and they may be useful as new and novel therapeutic targets for ovarian cancer.

Female↗