Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Orthodontic Space Closure”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Congenitally missing mandibular second premolar: treatment outcome with orthodontic space closure.

Orthodontic treatment for patients with congenitally missing mandibular second premolars can be challenging. Treatment options include keeping the deciduous second molar, extracting the molars and allowing the space to close spontaneously, autotransplantation, prosthetic replacement, and orthodontic space closure. Space closure with orthodontic appliances is demonstrated in this case report.

Anodontia↗
PubMed2000

The congenitally missing upper lateral incisor. A retrospective study of orthodontic space closure versus restorative treatment.

Orthodontic treatment for patients with uni- or bilateral congenitally missing lateral incisors is a challenge to effective treatment planning. The two major alternatives, orthodontic space closure or space opening for prosthetic replacements, can both compromise aesthetics, periodontal health, and function. The aim of this retrospective study was to examine treated patients who had congenitally missing lateral incisors and to compare their opinion of the aesthetic result with the dentists' opinions of occlusal function and periodontal health. In this sample, 50 patients were identified. Thirty had been treated with orthodontic space closure, and 20 by space opening and a prosthesis (porcelain bonded to gold and resin bonded bridges). The patient's opinion of the aesthetic result was evaluated using the Eastman Esthetic Index questionnaire and during a structured interview. The functional status, dental contact patterns, periodontal condition, and quality of the prosthetic replacement was evaluated. In general, subjects treated with orthodontic space closure were more satisfied with the appearance of their teeth than those who had a prosthesis. No significant differences in the prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) were found. However, patients with prosthetic replacements had impaired periodontal health with accumulation of plaque and gingivitis. The conclusion of this study is that orthodontic space closure produces results that are well accepted by patients, does not impair temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function, and encourages periodontal health in comparison with prosthetic replacements.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

A randomized clinical trial to compare three methods of orthodontic space closure.

AIM: To compare the rates of orthodontic space closure for: Active ligatures, polyurethane powerchain (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, RMO Europe, Parc d'Innovation, Rue Geiler de Kaysersberg, 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, Strasbourg, France) and nickel titanium springs. SAMPLE: Patients entering the space closure phase of fixed orthodontic treatment attending six orthodontic providers. Twelve patients received active ligatures (48 quadrants), 10 patients received powerchain (40 quadrants) and 11 patients, nickel-titanium springs (44 quadrants). METHOD: Patients were randomly allocated for treatment with active ligatures, powerchain or nickel titanium springs. Upper and lower study models were collected at the start of space closure (T(o)) and 4 months later (T(1)). We recorded whether the patient wore Class II or Class III elastics. Space present in all four quadrants was measured, by a calibrated examiner, using Vernier callipers at T(o) and T(1.) The rate of space closure, in millimetres per month (4 weeks) and a 4-monthly rate, was then calculated. Examiner reliability was assessed at least 2 weeks later. RESULTS: Mean rates of space closure were 0.35 mm/month for active ligatures, 0.58 mm/month for powerchain, and 0.81 mm/month for NiTi springs. No statistically significant differences were found between any methods with the exception of NiTi springs showing more rapid space closure than active ligatures (P < 0.05). There was no effect of inter-arch elastics on rate of space closure. CONCLUSIONS: NiTi springs gave the most rapid rate of space closure and may be considered the treatment of choice. However, powerchain provides a cheaper treatment option that is as effective. The use of inter-arch elastics does not appear to influence rate of space closure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Outcome of orthodontic space closure with a missing maxillary central incisor.

Orthodontic space closure is one of the treatment alternatives when a maxillary central incisor is missing. Because no systematic analysis of such treatment results is available, a sample of 20 consecutively treated patients was examined in a follow-up study. All patients had received orthodontic treatment with the objective of closing the space for the missing central incisor. Biologic features and the clinical appearance of the recontoured lateral incisor (test tooth) replacing the missing tooth were compared with the neighboring intact central incisor, which served as control tooth. The patients' opinions regarding the treatment and the result were recorded in a questionnaire. The position of the examined teeth and the appearance of the surrounding soft tissues were similar in the test and control teeth. However, in some patients (25%), certain aspects of the recontoured incisor crown (such as the width at the gingival margin) mismatched the appearance of the controls. A somewhat increased mobility and probing pocket depth on the mesial aspect was recorded for some test teeth. No obvious detrimental effects were observed on the radiographs. Most patients expressed satisfaction with the treatment result. It is concluded that orthodontic mesialization of the lateral incisor to replace a missing central incisor is a valid treatment modality, if the indications for such treatment are present and careful attention to detail in orthodontic and restorative treatment is exercised.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Indications for compensatory extractions in orthodontic space closure in the frontal segments.

This follow-up study presents patients who underwent orthodontic space closure in the maxilla after traumatic loss of frontal teeth or aplasia of a lateral incisor. Comparison covers findings obtained from casts and cephalograms in 24 patients with or without compensatory extraction. The findings indicate that acceptable results regarding axial tooth positioning and profile can be obtained without compensatory extraction. Prerequisites are distal occlusion of the first molars by one premolar width and continuous monitoring for regular overbite and uncrowded lower incisors. If orthodontic space closure can be achieved only by compensatory extraction, the indication for this space closure procedure calls for even more critical judgement.

Bicuspid↗
PubMed2002

Orthodontic space closure without counterbalancing extractions in patients with bilateral aplasia of the lower second premolars.

BACKGROUND: Orthodontic space closure in situations with bilateral aplastic lower second premolars without maxillary extractions is a rarely practiced treatment method. Due to the high risk of severe side effects, preference is currently given to the maintenance of deciduous second molars and subsequent prosthodontic solutions. As a combination of Class I push and Class II pull mechanics seemed likely to reduce secondary effects by transferring the anchorage site from the reactive lower anterior teeth to the more resistant upper arch, a clinical study was carried out in order to investigate effects and secondary effects of the mechanics. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Casts, panoramic radiographs and lateral headfilms of 13 consecutively treated, non-selected adolescents (seven boys, six girls, mean age at start of treatment 13 years 4 months) were evaluated. In six patients a Jasper Jumper trade mark was inserted in addition for a mean period of 6 months. RESULTS: The treatment outcome after a mean period of 3 years and 1 month showed in almost all cases the desired Class III molar occlusion of one cusp width (+/- 1/4 cw) with overbite and overjet within the normal range. Analyses of static and dynamic occlusion revealed anterior/canine protected articulation and a satisfactory number of centric contact points. A significant space gain (p </= 0.01) distal to the lower second molars (right side: 4.9 mm, left side: 5,3 mm) confirmed a relevant movement of the lower molars to mesial and an increased probability of being able to save the lower third molars as a natural substitute for the aplastic second premolars. Mean reductions in incisor inclination were low (0.5 degrees ) in the upper and moderate (4.3 degrees ) in the lower arch. CONCLUSION: Bearing in mind that supporting anchorage measures may be needed to compensate for unfavorable cofactors, the investigated treatment method can be recommended for those patients giving preference to a prosthetic-free dentition and to avoiding surgical interventions.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

[The significance of gingival invagination in orthodontic space closure. A clinico-radiological study].

23 extraction sites from group I (14 patients, average age 25 years, two months) which exhibited gingival invagination during orthodontic space closure with fixed appliances were compared with an equal number of extraction sites without gingival invaginations from group II patients (13 patients, average age 22 years, three months). Clinical analysis criteria were: interdental distance, treatment period, depth of gingival invagination, plaque index, gingival index, and probing depth. The marginal bone level at the teeth and the interdental bone height were measured by radiographs. Comparisons of the group I information with the information from group II obtained by applying the same analysis criteria revealed that, given proper oral hygiene, the presence of gingival invaginations (mean depth 2.7 +/- 1.1 mm) has no influence on the hygienic state and, the level of gingival inflammation in the invagination area. However, a marginal bone loss at the teeth mesial and distal to the extraction sites, a reduction of the interdental crestal bone height, and an extended time frame for orthodontic space closure must be expected.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Guided bone regeneration of a pronounced gingivo-alveolar cleft due to orthodontic space closure.

BACKGROUND: Gingival invagination is a relatively common occurrence following orthodontic closure of extraction sites. The present paper reports a combined periodontal and orthodontic treatment in a patient with a severe gingivo-alveolar cleft due to orthodontic closure of maxillary central incisor extraction space. METHODS: A definite interdental gingival cleft, extending 8 mm into the alveolar bone, required the correction of the gingival deformity as a first step, followed by guided bone regeneration (GBR). The GBR approach included the emptying of the incisive foramen to approximately 5 mm in depth followed by the insertion of bioabsorbable hydroxyapatite and covering with a bioabsorbable barrier membrane. Six months afterward, the orthodontic therapy was resumed. RESULTS: Radiographs and clinical examination 4 years after the completion of therapy indicates functionally and aesthetically satisfactory and stable results. CONCLUSION: The present paper illustrates an additional application for the guided bone regeneration technique.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Orthodontic space closure of the edentulous maxillary first molar area in adults.

The purpose of this study was to examine the dental and periodontal changes associated with orthodontic space closure of edentulous maxillary first molar areas in adults. The sample consisted of 20 quadrants from 18 patients. The pretreatment and posttreatment records included study casts, lateral cephalometric radiographs, and periapical or panoramic radiographs. Space closure averaged 5.3 mm. Eleven quadrants showed complete space closure, and nine quadrants averaged 1.0 mm of remaining space. Vertical bone loss averaged 1.2 mm mesial to and distal to the second molar and 0.6 mm distal to the second premolar. Although 60% of the quadrants showed less than or equal to 1.5 mm of bone loss, the maximal bone loss reached 4.0 mm mesial to, and 5.0 mm distal to, the second molar. Although space closure should be considered a potential solution in the absence of the first permanent molar, alveolar bone loss and space opening can be common sequelae to this procedure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Orthodontic space closure in combination with membrane supported healing of extraction sockets (MHE) a pilot study.

AIM: In periodontology and implantology the guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique represents a well established and successful method for augmentation of alveolar bone. The aim of the present study was to evaluate what advantages, if any, are offered for orthodontic space closure by membrane supported healing of extraction sockets (MHE) (criteria: rate of movement, incidence of gingival clefts, atrophy of the alveolar bone). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Within the scope of orthodontic therapy with a complete fixed appliance, three girls aged 11-14 years with indication for extraction of the first premolars were unilaterally augmented with an e-PTFE membrane (Gore-Tex((R)), W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) immediately after premolar extraction. The study was performed in the split-mouth technique. An atraumatic extraction without digital compression was performed on the control side. The membranes were fixed with a Frios((R)) fixation set (Friadent, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and removed after 6 to 8 weeks. 1 week after membrane removal, space closure was started simultaneously with passive rectangular segmented archwires using Sentalloy((R)) closed coil springs (GAC International, Inc., Gräfelfing, Germany) at a constant force of 200 cN. The transversal and vertical dimensions of the alveolar bone the rate of space closure were determined clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: Complications were not observed in any patient. The MHE-treated alveolar region showed pronounced stability of the transversal dimension. Space closure was performed in all cases without gingival clefts being induced. The control side showed distinct atrophy as well as gingival clefts. No differences were recorded in the rate of space closure. CONCLUSION: The MHE technique seems to be a suitable means of creating favorable periodontal conditions for tooth movement, especially in cases of alveolar bone loss after extraction or trauma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Orthodontic space closure without contralateral extraction through mesial movement of lower molars in patients with aplastic lower second premolars.

METHOD AND PATIENTS: A method is presented that allows unilateral space closure in patients with aplastic lower second premolars. Based on a straight-wire appliance, space closure was achieved with a combination of "push mechanics" using the second molar as an anchorage unit and Class II "pull mechanics", thus avoiding the application of any distalizing force on the lower incisors. The results from 13 consecutively treated subjects (five boys, eight girls, mean age 12 years and 6 months) were analyzed. RESULTS: Complete bodily space closure was achieved in all 13 cases within a mean treatment time of 2 years and 7 months. The desired Angle Class III molar relationship of one premolar width (+/- 1/4 premolar width) on the aplastic side was successful in eleven patients, an additional 4.7 mm of space being created for the third molar on the aplastic side compared with the contralateral side (p < or = 0.01). However, adverse effects could be kept to a minimum, with no method-dependent side effects being recorded with regard to canine and molar relationships on the contralateral side, or to overbite, overjet, or upper and lower incisor inclination. The mean lower midline shift of 0.8 mm was in accordance with the mean distal canine relationship of 1/3 premolar width on the aplastic side. CONCLUSION: These results confirm that orthodontic space closure in cases of unilateral aplastic lower second premolars can be performed successfully with the presented treatment method without the need for additional premolar extractions, prosthodontic treatment or implants. Furthermore, the prognosis for the lower wisdom tooth on the aplastic side is improved.

Bicuspid↗
PubMed1996

Optimal orthodontic space closure in adult patients.

The basic mechanical principles of various approaches to space closure to achieve treatment goals were presented. Practical methods for closing space were outlined with particular attention to controlling deleterious side effects. Special requirements for space closure in adult patients were addressed with specific recommendations for this category of tooth movement.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

A clinical investigation of force delivery systems for orthodontic space closure.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the force retention, and rates of space closure achieved by elastomeric chain and nickel titanium coil springs. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Eastman Dental Hospital, London and Queen Mary's University Hospital, Roehampton, 1998-2000. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two orthodontic patients, wearing the pre-adjusted edgewise appliance undergoing space closure in opposing quadrants, using sliding mechanics on 0.019 x 0.025-inch posted stainless steel archwires. Medium-spaced elastomeric chain [Durachain, OrthoCare (UK) Ltd., Bradford, UK] and 9-mm nickel titanium coil springs [OrthoCare (UK) Ltd.] were placed in opposing quadrants for 15 patients. Elastomeric chain only was used in a further seven patients. The initial forces on placement and residual forces at the subsequent visit were measured with a dial push-pull gauge [Orthocare (UK) Ltd]. Study models of eight patients were taken before and after space closure, from which measurements were made to establish mean space closure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The forces were measured in grammes and space closure in millimetres. RESULTS: Fifty-nine per cent (31/53) of the elastomeric sample maintained at least 50 per cent of the initial force over a time period of 1-15 weeks. No sample lost all its force, and the mean loss was 47 per cent (range: 0-76 per cent). Nickel titanium coil springs lost force rapidly over 6 weeks, following that force levels plateaued. Forty-six per cent (12/26) maintained at least 50 per cent of their initial force over a time period of 1-22 weeks, and mean force loss was 48 per cent (range: 12-68 per cent). The rate of mean weekly space closure for elastomeric chain was 0.21 mm and for nickel titanium coil springs 0.26 mm. There was no relationship between the initial force applied and rate of space closure. None of the sample failed during the study period giving a 100 per cent response rate. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical use, the force retention of elastomeric chain was better than previously concluded. High initial forces resulted in high force decay. Nickel titanium coil springs and elastomeric chain closed spaces at a similar rate.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

[Problems in orthodontic space closure after loss of first permanent molars].

Space closure after loss of first permanent molars represents a difficult treatment task. To arrive at a reasonable treatment result a great variety of factors has to be evaluated in each individual case. These are among others: patient's age, topography of toothless alveolar bone, specific periodontal conditions and general orthodontic problems. In case of several unfavourable prognosticated factors alternative treatment methods should be taken into consideration.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1981

Orthodontic space closure.

We have attempted in this chapter to familiarize the clinician with the management of spaces in the dentition. Understanding the etiology of the spaces will not only aid in the formulation of a proper treatment plan but also help in predicting the stability of the treatment results. A carefully designed mechanics plan will enable the clinician to optimize his treatment efforts. Although it would be almost impossible to include all conceivable space problems, application of the basic principles described above should facilitate the management of most of the problems encountered in practice.

Diastema↗