Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Orlistat”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Weight loss, weight maintenance, and improved cardiovascular risk factors after 2 years treatment with orlistat for obesity. European Orlistat Obesity Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of orlistat, a new lipase inhibitor, on long-term weight loss, to determine the extent to which orlistat treatment minimizes weight regain in a second year of treatment, and to assess the effects of orlistat on obesity-related risk factors. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: This was a 2-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Obese patients (body mass index 28 to 43 kg/m2) were randomized to placebo or orlistat (60 or 120 mg) three times a day, combined with a hypocaloric diet during the first year and a weight maintenance diet in the second year of treatment to prevent weight regain. Changes in body weight, lipid profile, glycemic control, blood pressure, quality of life, safety, and tolerability were measured. RESULTS: Orlistat-treated patients lost significantly more weight (p<0.001) than placebo-treated patients after Year 1 (6.6%, 8.6%, and 9.7% for the placebo, and orlistat 60 mg and 120 mg groups, respectively). During the second year, orlistat therapy produced less weight regain than placebo (p = 0.005 for orlistat 60 mg; p<0.001 for orlistat 120 mg). Several obesity-related risk factors improved significantly more with orlistat treatment than with placebo. Orlistat was generally well tolerated and only 6% of orlistat-treated patients withdrew because of adverse events. Orlistat leads to predictable gastrointestinal effects related to its mode of action, which were generally mild, transient, and self-limiting and usually occurred early during treatment. DISCUSSION: Orlistat administered for 2 years promotes weight loss and minimizes weight regain. Additionally, orlistat therapy improves lipid profile, blood pressure, and quality of life.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Randomised placebo-controlled trial of orlistat for weight loss and prevention of weight regain in obese patients. European Multicentre Orlistat Study Group.

BACKGROUND: We undertook a randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, in promoting weight loss and preventing weight regain in obese patients over a 2-year period. METHODS: 743 patients (body-mass index 28-47 kg/m2), recruited at 15 European centres, entered a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period on a slightly hypocaloric diet (600 kcal/day deficit). 688 patients who completed the lead-in were assigned double-blind treatment with orlistat 120 mg (three times a day) or placebo for 1 year in conjunction with the hypocaloric diet. In a second 52-week double-blind period patients were reassigned orlistat or placebo with a weight maintenance (eucaloric) diet. FINDINGS: From the start of lead-in to the end of year 1, the orlistat group lost, on average, more bodyweight than the placebo group (10.2% [10.3 kg] vs 6.1% [6.1 kg]; LSM difference 3.9 kg [p<0.001] from randomisation to the end of year 1). During year 2, patients who continued with orlistat regained, on average, half as much weight as those patients switched to placebo (p<0.001). Patients switched from placebo to orlistat lost an additional 0.9 kg during year 2, compared with a mean regain of 2.5 kg in patients who continued on placebo (p<0.001). Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, LDL/high-density lipoprotein ratio, and concentrations of glucose and insulin decreased more in the orlistat group than in the placebo group. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the orlistat group. Other adverse symptoms occurred at a similar frequency during both treatments. INTERPRETATION: Orlistat taken with an appropriate diet promotes clinically significant weight loss and reduces weight regain in obese patients over a 2-year period. The use of orlistat beyond 2 years needs careful monitoring with respect to efficacy and adverse events.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Efficacy and tolerability of orlistat in the treatment of obesity: a 6-month dose-ranging study. Orlistat Dose-Ranging Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the weight-reducing efficacy of orlistat, a novel gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, and to define the optimal dosage regimen and establish the tolerability of the drug when used for a 6-month treatment period. METHODS: The study was a multicentre randomised, double-blind, parallel group in design and involved 676 obese male and female subjects aged at least 18 years with a body mass index between 28 and 43 kg x m(-2) Following a 5-week placebo run-in period, subjects were randomised to receive orlistat 30 mg, 60 mg, 120 mg, 240 mg or matching placebo three times a day (tid) for 24 weeks during meals. Patients were maintained on a mildly hypocaloric diet throughout the study period. The primary efficacy parameter was body weight change over time. RESULTS: Orlistat resulted in a significantly greater mean loss of body weight than observed in the placebo group. In absolute terms, mean weight loss was greatest in the 120 mg group (9.8%). More orlistat- than placebo-treated patients lost > 10% of initial body weight (37% of the 120 mg group vs 19% of the placebo group). Orlistat was well tolerated. Predictably, in view of its known pharmacological effects, more orlistat-treated patients experienced gastrointestinal events. Mean levels of vitamins A, D and E, and beta-carotene remained within the clinical reference ranges in all treatment groups and rarely required supplementation. After 24 weeks, plasma concentrations of orlistat were either non-measurable or detected at the assay's limit of quantitation. CONCLUSION: Orlistat treatment results in a dose-dependent reduction in body weight in obese subjects and is well tolerated. Orlistat 120 mg tid represents the optimal dosage regimen.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The interaction of the lipase inhibitor orlistat with ethanol in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to investigate the possible interference of ethanol on the orlistat effect on inhibition of dietary fat absorption and the possible interference of orlistat on the pharmacokinetics of ethanol. Secondary objectives were to assess the tolerability during concomitant dosing of orlistat and ethanol and to determine the ethanol effect on plasma levels of orlistat. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, randomized study performed in 30 (three parallel groups of ten subjects each) healthy normal weight male subjects between the ages of 20 and 30 years. A 5-day run-in period to accustom subjects to a standardized diet of 2500 kcal/day (30% fat) and to establish baseline fecal fat excretion was followed by a 6-day treatment period. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (A = orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. and ethanol placebo, B = orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. and 40 g ethanol qd on days -1 and 6, and 40 g bid on days 1-5, and C = orlistat placebo tid and 40 g ethanol qd on days -1 and 6, and 40 g b.i.d. on days 1 5). Serial blood samples were collected for determination of ethanol serum concentrations at specified times over 5 h after each dose of ethanol on days -1 and 6, and for determination of orlistat plasma concentrations on days 1, 3, 5, and 6. Feces were collected quantitatively on days -5 through 8 for analysis of fecal fat. RESULTS: The means of baseline-corrected fecal fat excretion values were comparable: 23.7 g for group A (orlistat) and 22.7 g for group B (orlistat and ethanol). No significant difference was found regarding ethanol pharmacokinetic parameters between treatments with orlistat and placebo. No apparent differences existed between the number of plasma samples with measurable orlistat concentrations in groups A and B. CONCLUSION: Concomitant ingestion of social amounts of ethanol did not alter the inhibitory effect of orlistat on dietary fat absorption during short-term treatment (6 days) with orlistat. Short-term treatment with orlistat had no significant influence on ethanol pharmacokinetics.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

One-year treatment of obesity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study of orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of orlistat (Xenical) in producing and maintaining weight loss over a 12-month period. DESIGN: Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with either orlistat 120 mg or placebo three times daily, in conjunction with a low-energy diet, for 12 months. SETTING: Five centres in the UK. SUBJECTS: 228 obese adult patients with body mass index between 30 and 43 kg/m2 and mean weight 97 kg (range 74-144 kg). INTERVENTIONS: All patients were prescribed a low-energy diet, providing 30% of energy from fat, designed to produce an individually tailored energy deficit of approximately 600 kcal/day, for a run-in period of 4 weeks and then 12 months, plus orlistat 120 mg or placebo three times daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in body weight (the primary efficacy parameter), waist circumference and adverse events were reviewed regularly, together with serum lipids, insulin, glucose and plasma levels of fat-soluble vitamins and beta carotene. RESULTS: Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, after 1 y of treatment patients receiving orlistat had lost an average of 8.5% of their initial body weight compared with 5.4% for placebo-treated patients; 35% of the orlistat group lost at least 5% of body weight compared with 21% of the placebo group (P < 0.05), and 28% and 17%, respectively (P = 0.04) lost at least 10% of body weight. Orlistat-treated patients showed significant decreases (P < 0.05) in serum levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and in the low density lipoprotein: high density lipoprotein ratio in comparison with placebo. Both groups had similar adverse-event profiles, except for gastrointestinal events, which were 26% more frequent in the orlistat group but were mostly mild and transient. To maintain normal plasma levels of fat-soluble vitamins, supplements of vitamins A, D and E were given to 1.8%, 8.0% and 3.6%, respectively, of orlistat-treated patients, compared with 0.9% of placebo-treated patients for each vitamin type. After 1 y, the decrease in vitamin E and beta carotene was significantly greater in orlistat-treated patients compared with those receiving placebo (P < 0.001). No significant change was found in the mean vitamin E:total cholesterol ratio in either group after 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Orlistat, in conjunction with a low-energy diet, produced greater and more frequent significant weight loss than placebo during 1 y of treatment. One-third of orlistat-treated patients achieved clinically relevant weight loss (> or = 5% initial body weight). There was also an improvement in relevant serum lipid parameters. Fat-soluble vitamin supplements may be required during chronic therapy. Orlistat was well tolerated and offers a promising new approach to the long-term management of obesity.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Weight control and risk factor reduction in obese subjects treated for 2 years with orlistat: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor that reduces dietary fat absorption by approximately 30%, may promote weight loss and reduce cardiovascular risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that orlistat combined with dietary intervention is more effective than placebo plus diet for weight loss and maintenance over 2 years. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted from October 1992 to October 1995. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Obese adults (body mass index [weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters], 30-43 kg/m2) evaluated at 18 US research centers. INTERVENTION: Subjects received placebo plus a controlled-energy diet during a 4-week lead-in. On study day 1, the diet was continued and subjects were randomized to receive placebo 3 times a day or orlistat, 120 mg 3 times a day, for 52 weeks. After 52 weeks, subjects began a weight-maintenance diet, and the placebo group (n = 133) continued to receive placebo and orlistat-treated subjects were rerandomized to receive placebo 3 times a day (n = 138), orlistat, 60 mg (n = 152) or 120 mg (n = 153) 3 times a day, for an additional 52 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Body weight change and changes in blood pressure and serum lipid, glucose, and insulin levels. RESULTS: A total of 1187 subjects entered the protocol, and 892 were randomly assigned on day 1 to double-blind treatment. For intent-to-treat analysis, 223 placebo-treated subjects and 657 orlistat-treated subjects were evaluated. During the first year orlistat-treated subjects lost more weight (mean +/- SEM, 8.76+/-0.37 kg) than placebo-treated subjects (5.81+/-0.67 kg) (P<.001). Subjects treated with orlistat, 120 mg 3 times a day, during year 1 and year 2 regained less weight during year 2 (3.2+/-0.45 kg; 35.2% regain) than those who received orlistat, 60 mg (4.26+/-0.57 kg; 51.3% regain), or placebo (5.63+/-0.42 kg; 63.4% regain) in year 2 (P<.001). Treatment with orlistat, 120 mg 3 times a day, was associated with improvements in fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and insulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Two-year treatment with orlistat plus diet significantly promotes weight loss, lessens weight regain, and improves some obesity-related disease risk factors.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Orlistat: a review of its use in the management of obesity.

UNLABELLED: Orlistat is a novel non-systemic treatment for obesity. The drug inhibits lipases in the gastrointestinal tract, preventing the absorption of approximately 30% of dietary fat. Pharmacodynamic and dose-finding studies have established that a 120 mg dose of orlistat 3 times daily (with each main meal) is optimal. Controlled studies have established that orlistat 120 mg 3 times daily for 1 year, in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet, enables weight reduction of 7.9 to 10.2% in obese non-diabetic individuals. In 1 study the reduction was 6.2% in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Orlistat 120 mg 3 times daily was significantly more effective than placebo (also given in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet) in these studies. The drug was also significantly more effective than placebo in 2-year randomised double-blind studies involving >2000 patients. During the second year of treatment, when patients were switched from a hypocaloric diet to a eucaloric diet, orlistat recipients regained significantly less weight than placebo recipients. Orlistat appears to improve lipid profiles in non-diabetic obese patients, reducing levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol. In a study of patients with obesity associated with type 2 diabetes, patients treated with orlistat lost more weight and had improved serum lipid profiles compared with placebo recipients. In addition, orlistat-treated patients achieved significant improvements in glycaemic control, enabling dosages of antidiabetic drugs to be reduced. Long term (1 to 2 years) tolerability data from 2038 patients in placebo-controlled trials revealed that the drug was generally well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse events were related to decreased fat absorption and included oily faecal spotting, flatus with discharge, faecal urgency and oily stool. Systemic adverse events attributable to orlistat were negligible. CONCLUSION: Orlistat in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet has been shown to induce clinically significant weight loss in keeping with current guidelines for the management of obesity. This, together with its acceptable tolerability profile and lack of systemic adverse events, make it an attractive option in the treatment of obesity. The drug may have a positive effect on obesity-associated cardiovascular risk factors and type 2 diabetes.

Anti-Obesity Agents↗
PubMed1997

A one-year trial to assess the value of orlistat in the management of obesity.

OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the methodology of a multicentre study designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of orlistat 120 mg tid as therapy for inducing weight loss in excess of that achieved with a moderately calorie-restricted diet alone. The results from a single centre are presented to illustrate the nature of the response. DESIGN: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled multicentre study. A four-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period preceded a 52 week double-blind treatment period during which patients received either orlistat or placebo three times a day. At the start of the run-in period, all patients were placed on a diet containing approximately 30% of calories as fat and designed to cause an energy deficit of approximately 600 kcal/d. SUBJECTS: Patients of either sex, more than 18 y of age, with a body mass index (BMI) between 30 and 43 kg/m2 were eligible for enrolment. MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy assessments included: measurements of body weight; anthropometry; quality of life; blood pressure; serum lipids; fasting serum glucose and insulin. Safety assessments included: adverse events; vital signs; ECG; renal and gallbladder ultrasound; haematology; serum biochemistry. OUTCOME: In the single centre there was a reduction in body weight of 5.5 +/- 4.5 (s.d.) kg (5.7% reduction) in the placebo group and 8.6 +/- 5.4kg in the orlistat-treated group (8.4% reduction) by six months. Thereafter, the placebo group tended to relapse whereas the orlistat group maintained their loss (2.6% vs 8.4% reduction from initial value at 52 weeks). Total and LDL cholesterol fell by 0.05 mmol/l (1.6%) and 0.14 mmol/l (4.2%), respectively, in orlistat treated patients. The drop-out rate was 48% in the placebo group and 39% in the orlistat group. Intestinal symptoms related to orlistat were significantly increased compared to placebo but were well tolerated. Fat soluble vitamin levels remained within the normal range in the treatment group; the reduction seen in alpha-tocopherol levels in patients receiving orlistat was normalized by the decrease in plasma cholesterol concentrations. Beta-carotene and vitamin D concentrations also decreased in orlistat-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary analysis suggests that orlistat, when used with a health-promoting low-fat and moderately energy-restricted diet, confers advantages in the long-term management of obesity.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Orlistat in the long-term treatment of obesity in primary care settings.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and tolerability within primary care settings of orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, for the treatment of obesity. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS: A group of 796 obese patients (body mass index, 30-44 kg/m2), treated with placebo 3 times a day (TID), 60 mg of orlistat TID, or 120 mg of orlistat TID, in conjunction with a reduced-energy diet for the first year and a weight-maintenance diet during the second year. SETTING: Seventeen primary care centers in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in body weight and obesity-related disease risk factors. RESULTS: Patients treated with orlistat lost significantly more weight (7.08 +/- 0.54 and 7.94 +/- 0.57 kg for the 60-mg and 120-mg orlistat groups, respectively) than those treated with placebo (4.14 +/- 0.56 kg) in year 1 (P<.001) and sustained more of this weight loss during year 2 (P<.001). More patients treated with orlistat lost 5% or more of their initial weight in year 1 (48.8% and 50.5% of patients in the 60-mg and 120-mg groups, respectively) compared with placebo (30.7%; P<.001), and approximately 34% of patients in the orlistat groups sustained weight loss of 5% or greater over 2 years compared with 24% in the placebo group (P<.001). Orlistat produced greater improvements than placebo in serum lipid levels and blood pressure and was well tolerated, although treatment resulted in a higher incidence of gastrointestinal events. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term study indicates that orlistat is an effective adjunct to dietary intervention in the treatment of obesity in primary care settings.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

The effect of the gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, orlistat, on serum lipids and lipoproteins in patients with primary hyperlipidaemia.

The effect of orlistat, a nonabsorbed inhibitor of gastric and pancreatic lipases, was examined in patients with primary hyperlipidaemia (serum cholesterol > or = 6.2 mmol.l-1 and triglycerides < or = 5.0 mmol.l-1) not responsive to dietary change alone. In a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study, 103 men and 70 women received 30, 90, 180, or 360 mg or orlistat or placebo for 8 weeks. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were reduced by 4% and 5% with 30 mg orlistat, by 7% and 8% with 90 mg orlistat, by 7% and 7% with 180 mg orlistat and by 11% and 10% with 360 mg orlistat compared to placebo. High density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly decreased in the 360 mg orlistat group. Triglyceride levels significantly increased in the placebo group but not in the drug groups. Body weight decreased by 1.2 kg with 360 mg orlistat, despite a weight maintenance diet. Decreases in vitamin E and D levels occurred, although both vitamins remained within the normal range. Adverse effects from the gastrointestinal tract were frequent, but led to discontinuation of therapy in only seven patients. Orlistat is a new therapeutic drug for the treatment of hyperlipidaemia that may be particularly useful among overweight patients. Its potential place in therapy will await long-term studies. Vitamin supplementation should be considered during treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[What is the evidence with regard to the effectiveness of orlistat?].

BACKGROUND: Obesity is worldwide one of today's most important medical and public health problems. Orlistat (Xenical) is a relatively new drug in the pharmacological treatment of obesity which partially blocks fat absorption. The following article analyses the available evidence of orlistat's effectiveness in the treatment of obese patients. METHODS: Three randomised controlled trials investigating the effect of orlistat in the treatment of obesity were identified by systematic Medline search. The internal and external validity of these studies was assessed using systematic criteria. RESULTS: All three studies consistently demonstrate a treatment benefit of orlistat compared to placebo. Patients treated with orlistat lost an average of 3.4 kg more than patients taking placebo while on a hypocaloric diet. Simultaneously, control of cardiovascular risk factors improved independently of the observed weight loss. Up to 40% of all patients experienced gastrointestinal side effects which were generally well tolerated. The studies prove that treatment with orlistat can result in a moderate weight reduction. However, the results of the studies cannot be easily generalised to obese patients in a primary care setting, due to limitations concerning the studies' internal and external validity. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these studies orlistat is an efficient pharmacological treatment for obesity in patients adhering to a hypocaloric diet. Studies demonstrating orlistat's effectiveness in a primary care setting are so far lacking. From a public health perspective there is a need for a randomised controlled trial showing not only orlistat's effectiveness on surrogate markers in a primary care setting but, ideally, a reduction in obesity-related mortality and morbidity.

Anti-Obesity Agents↗
PubMed1995

Review of limited systemic absorption of orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, in healthy human volunteers.

Orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, acts locally in the gastrointestinal tract. Systemic absorption is not required for its efficacy, but knowledge of the extent of its systemic absorption is important for its safe use in obese patients, the intended target population. Pharmacokinetic screening was carried out by monitoring plasma concentrations of unchanged orlistat in 25 phase 1 studies (including two mass balance studies) in normal and obese healthy volunteers. The results of these studies indicate an extremely low degree of systemic absorption for orlistat when administered with a hypocaloric, well-balanced diet with 20% to 30% of calories derived from fat (50-80 gm). To further characterize the pharmacokinetics and excretion pathways of orlistat, two mass balance studies using 14C-labeled orlistat were conducted. After oral dosing of radiolabeled orlistat with a fatty meal (28-30 gm fat), almost the entire dose was recovered from fecal samples; little was found in plasma and urine. It is concluded that systemic absorption of orlistat is negligible; at a clinically efficacious dose level, orlistat is unlikely to produce systemic lipase inhibition.

Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic↗
PubMed1996

Influence of orlistat on the regulation of gallbladder contraction in man: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study.

Orlistat (tetrahydrolipstatin) is a potent inhibitor of gastric and pancreatic lipase activity causing a diminution of free fatty acids in the intestinal lumen. The release of cholecystokinin (CCK) critically depends on the presence of free fatty acids in the small intestine. Postprandial CCK release and gallbladder contraction might be decreased by orlistat, potentially resulting in an increased risk of gallstone formation. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, six-way crossover study, six healthy volunteers ingested in a randomized order three isocaloric test meals (250 ml) of identical osmolality with either orlistat (200 mg) or placebo: (a) a pure-fat meal (25 g triglycerides), (b) a mixed meal containing fat (8 g; 29% of caloric content), protein (10 g; 17%), and dextrose (32 g; 54%), and (c) a fat-free meal containing albumin (25 g; 46%) and dextrose (32 g; 54%). Gallbladder volumes were determined by ultrasonography, and plasma CCK, pancreatic polypeptide and gastrin levels by RIA. Gall-bladder contraction (AUC, % x 90 min; difference of means +/- 95% CI) in subjects receiving orlistat or placebo did not significantly differ after intake of the pure-fat meal (443+/-1174), the mixed meal (313+/-1170), or the fat-free-meal (-760+/-1180). The release of CCK (AUC; pM x 90 min; difference of means +/- 95% CI) was not different between orlistat and placebo after ingestion of the pure-fat meal (-18+/-64), the mixed meal (-45+/-62), and the fat-free meal (27+/-63). Likewise, the release of pancreatic polypeptide and gastrin was similar after intake of the meals with either orlistat or placebo. A single dose of orlistat did not reduce gallbladder motility after ingestion of meals with differing fat contents. The safety of long-term treatment with orlistat with respect to gallstone formation remains to be determined.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, for weight maintenance after conventional dieting: a 1-y study.

BACKGROUND: Long-term maintenance of weight loss remains a therapeutic challenge in obesity treatment. OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to test the hypothesis that orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, is significantly more effective than a placebo in preventing weight regain. DESIGN: Obese subjects who lost > or = 8% of their initial body weight during a 6-mo lead-in of a prescribed hypoenergetic diet (4180-kJ/d deficit) with no adjunctive pharmacotherapy were randomly assigned to receive placebo, 30 mg orlistat, 60 mg orlistat, or 120 mg orlistat 3 times daily for 1 y in combination with a maintenance diet to help prevent weight regain. Of 1313 recruited subjects [body mass index (in kg/m2): 28-43], 729 subjects lost > or =8% of their initial body weight during the 6-mo weight-loss lead-in period and were enrolled in the double-blind phase. RESULTS: After 1 y, subjects treated with 120 mg orlistat 3 times daily regained less weight than did placebo-treated subjects (32.8 +/- 4.5% compared with 58.7 +/- 5.8% regain of lost weight; P < 0.001). Moreover, more subjects in the 120-mg orlistat group than in the placebo group regained < or = 25% of lost weight (47.5% of subjects compared with 29.9%). In addition, orlistat treatment (120 mg 3 times daily) was associated with significantly greater reductions in total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations than was placebo (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of orlistat during periods of attempted weight maintenance minimizes weight readjustment and facilitates long-term improvement in obesity-related disease risk factors.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Treatment with orlistat reduces cardiovascular risk in obese patients.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of orlistat, as an adjunct to dietary modification, in weight reduction and modification of cardiovascular risk factors in obese patients after 1 year of treatment DESIGN: A total of 3132 obese patients (body mass index 28-43 kg/m2) were evaluated in an analysis of pooled data from five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of orlistat in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet. All studies included a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period during which patients followed a mildly hypocaloric diet, after which they were randomized to double-blind treatment with orlistat 120 mg three times a day (tid) or placebo for 1 year. RESULTS: After 1 year, orlistat 120 mg tid produced significantly more weight loss than placebo (9.2% vs 5.8%; P< 0.001). Furthermore, a greater proportion of orlistat-treated patients lost >5% or >10% of their initial body weight compared to placebo (69.6% vs 51.9%; P< 0.001 and 42.1% vs 22.7%; P< 0.001, respectively). Improvements in cardiovascular risk factors were observed during a 4-week placebo lead-in period. However, following randomization, orlistat-treated patients had significantly greater improvements than placebo-treated patients in several lipid parameters including total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B. In addition, orlistat had a beneficial effect on oral glucose tolerance tests status, waist circumference and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Orlistat was well tolerated and had a similar safety profile to placebo.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Role of orlistat in the treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes. A 1-year randomized double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is an important risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes is associated with improved glycemic control and reduced cardiovascular disease risk factors, but weight loss is notably difficult to achieve and sustain with caloric restriction and exercise. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of treatment with orlistat, a pancreatic lipase inhibitor, on weight loss, glycemic control, and serum lipid levels in obese patients with type 2 diabetes on sulfonylurea medications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a multicenter 57-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, 120 mg orlistat or placebo was administered orally three times a day with a mildly hypocaloric diet to 391 obese men and women with type 2 diabetes who were aged > 18 years, had a BMI of 28-40 kg/m2, and were clinically stable on oral sulfonylureas. Changes in body weight, glycemic control, lipid levels, and drug tolerability were measured. RESULTS: After 1 year of treatment, the orlistat group lost 6.2 +/- 0.45% (mean +/- SEM) of initial body weight vs. 4.3 +/- 0.49% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Twice as many patients receiving orlistat (49 vs. 23%) lost > or = 5% of initial body weight (P < 0.001). Orlistat treatment plus diet compared with placebo plus diet was associated with significant improvement in glycemic control, as reflected in decreases in HbA1c (P < 0.001) and fasting plasma glucose (P < 0.001) and in dosage reductions of oral sulfonylurea medication (P < 0.01). Orlistat therapy also resulted in significantly greater improvements than placebo in several lipid parameters, namely, greater reductions in total cholesterol, (P < 0.001), LDL cholesterol (P < 0.001), triglycerides (P < 0.05), apolipoprotein B (P < 0.001), and the LDL-to-HDL cholesterol ratio (P < 0.001). Mild to moderate and transient gastrointestinal events were reported with orlistat therapy, although their association with study withdrawal was low. Fat-soluble vitamin levels generally remained within the reference range, and vitamin supplementation was required in only a few patients. CONCLUSIONS: Orlistat is an effective treatment modality in obese patients with type 2 diabetes with respect to clinically meaningful weight loss and maintenance of weight loss, improved glycemic control, and improved lipid profile.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Effects of weight loss with orlistat on glucose tolerance and progression to type 2 diabetes in obese adults.

BACKGROUND: Orlistat is a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor that reduces dietary fat absorption by approximately 30%, promotes weight loss, and may reduce the risk of developing impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes in obese subjects. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that orlistat combined with dietary intervention improves glucose tolerance status and prevents worsening of diabetes status more effectively than placebo. METHODS: We pooled data from 675 obese (body mass index, 30-43 kg/m2) adults at 39 US and European research centers in 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trials. Subjects received placebo plus a low-energy diet during a 4-week lead-in period. On study day 1, the diet was continued, and subjects were randomized to receive placebo 3 times a day (n=316) or treatment with orlistat, 120 mg 3 times a day (n=359), for 104 weeks. A standard 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test was performed on day 1 and at the end of treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The categorical assessment of glucose tolerance status (normal, impaired, diabetic) and changes in status from randomization to end of treatment were the primary efficacy measures. The secondary measures were fasting and postchallenge glucose and insulin levels. RESULTS: The mean length of follow-up was 582 days. Subjects who were treated with orlistat lost more weight (mean +/- SEM, 6.72 +/- 0.41 kg from initial weight) than subjects who received placebo (3.79+/-0.38 kg; P<.001). A smaller percentage of subjects with impaired glucose tolerance at baseline progressed to diabetic status in the orlistat (3.0%) vs placebo (7.6%) group. Conversely, among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance at baseline, glucose levels normalized in more subjects after orlistat treatment (71.6%) vs placebo (49.1%; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of orlistat to a conventional weight loss regimen significantly improved oral glucose tolerance and diminished the rate of progression to the development of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Effect of orlistat on blood cyclosporin concentration in an obese heart transplant patient.

OBJECTIVE: We detected markedly decreased cyclosporin blood levels in a heart-transplanted patient after the gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor orlistat was accidentally added to the treatment program to control for his obesity. Therefore, we determined cyclosporin plasma concentration time kinetics with and without orlistat reexposition in this patient. METHODS: Plasma concentration time kinetics of whole blood cyclosporin levels in an obese heart-transplant patient were measured using a standard monoclonal fluorescence polarisation immunoassay. Results were obtained in hourly intervals up to 12 h without and with co-therapy of 3 x 120 mg orlistat (Xenical, Roche Ltd., Switzerland). The orlistat re-exposition was started the day before taking blood samples. RESULTS: Cyclosporin trough levels (98 ng/ml vs 52 ng/ml), maximum concentrations (532 ng/ml vs 74 ng/ml) and the area under the blood drug concentration-time curve (2832 ng h ml-1 vs 700 ng h ml-1) were greatly reduced with orlistat. CONCLUSIONS: Orlistat markedly decreased blood cyclosporin concentrations, possibly due to an interference with its absorption in the small intestine. To avoid potential dangerous under-immunosuppression, orlistat should not be used in patients taking cyclosporin.

Anti-Obesity Agents↗