Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Oregon Health Decisions”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1985

Oregon Health Decisions. An experiment with informed community consent.

Oregon Health Decisions is a citizen-based project intended to develop statewide awareness of severe bioethical dilemmas. The project has set in motion civic means for addressing and resolving problems in Oregon's health provision system associated with personal autonomy, equity of access, prevention of illness, and humane cost containment. The process of civic involvement with consequent results is described together with the implications for future health policy in Oregon and elsewhere.

Advisory Committees↗
PubMed1991

Priority setting: lessons from Oregon.

The state of Oregon has developed a unique method to set priorities for health services. The method is based on a cost-utility formula but also incorporates public attitudes and values. Using an explicit process, the Oregon Health Services Commission has completed the ranking of 714 condition-treatment pairs. The background, methods, and criticisms of the Oregon approach highlight key questions for managers and physicians in other health services when they allocate limited resources.

Community Participation↗
PubMed1992

An overview of allocation and rationing: implications for geriatrics.

Geriatricians are faced with increasing pressure from insurers and the public to control costs. At the same time, subspecialist colleagues, patients, and the courts often demand ever more costly high-technology interventions. This conflict will only intensify given the sustained increase in the percentage of GNP spent on medical care. A number of prominent biomedical ethicists and others have explored rationing of medical care services as one response to these concerns. This is the second in a series of articles in the Journal in response to the Oregon Health Decisions Initiative and is designed to provide (1) a brief ethical perspective on rationing and allocation; (2) an analysis of our present, largely implicit, approach to rationing and allocation; and (3) some suggestions that might move the United States closer to a more coherent and reasonable means of allocating and rationing health care.

Aged↗
PubMed1986

Health policy on the town meeting agenda.

American Health Decisions, a movement that started in Oregon, has spread to several other states. Through the media and widespread public discussion, the projects aim to increase public awareness about the individual and societal dimensions of ethical choices in health care.

Advisory Committees↗
PubMed1993

Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience.

How do we decide who should receive the benefits that medical science has to offer? One approach to this decision process, that used by the state of Oregon, is described: who and what are covered, and how health care is financed and delivered, are considered. Oregon's priorities were set on the basis of broad consensus. The objective of health care reform, it was agreed, is to improve, maintain, or restore health--not universal coverage, access to health care, or cost containment. A Health Services Commission was created to consider clinical effectiveness and, through public involvement, to attempt to integrate social values into the priority list. Oregon's legislature can use the list to develop an overall health policy which recognises that health can be maintained only if investments in several related areas are balanced.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Management. Setting priorities in health: the Oregon experiment (Part 1).

Increasing emphasis on obtaining consumer opinion in relation to needs assessment and decision making has led to interest in this country about the Oregon experiment in the US. Despite controversies over the efficacy of such approaches, it seems likely that future emphasis will be placed on devising systematic means of gathering information about societal preferences for care. In two articles, Ann Bowling reviews the evidence from America and relates it to the ongoing changes in the British health service. Part 1 introduces the ideas behind the Oregon experiment and examines similar initiatives in the UK.

Community Health Services↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Management. Setting priorities in health: the Oregon experiment (Part 2).

Increasing emphasis on obtaining consumer opinion in relation to needs assessment and decision making has led to interest in this country about the Oregon experiment in the US. In spite of controversies over the efficacy of such approaches, it seems likely that future emphasis will be placed on devising systematic means of gathering information about societal preferences for care. In two articles, Ann Bowling reviews the evidence from America and relates it to the ongoing changes in the British health service. Part 2 examines the methods, results and controversies generated by the Oregon experiment.

Community Health Services↗
PubMed1994

Publicity and pricelessness: grassroots decisionmaking and justice in rationing.

The "grassroots turn" in bioethical discussions about justice in allocation of health care resources has attracted a great deal of support; in the absence of a convincing theory of justice in rationing, democratic decisionmaking concerning priority setting emerges with a kind of inevitability. Yet there remain suspicions about this approach--most importantly, worries about the socially corrosive impact of explicit, public decisionmaking that in effect sets a price on the lives of persons. These worries have been quieted, particularly by the work of Leonard Fleck, but not altogether stilled. I explore more sympathetically the ideals to which concerns about public rationing somewhat dimly respond, and suggest constraints on priority setting discussions which might accommodate those ideals rather better.

Community Participation↗