Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ophthalmologists”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Is ophthalmology a pain-free career? A systematic review and meta-analysis of musculoskeletal pain among ophthalmologists.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the pooled prevalence, anatomical distribution, and occupational impact of work-related musculoskeletal (MSK) pain among ophthalmologists, and to identify modifiable ergonomic risk factors. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published data. The protocol was preregistered (PROSPERO CRD42023422368) and reported in accordance with PRISMA. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were 6691 ophthalmologists from 21 studies. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed) were searched for peer-reviewed quantitative studies reporting MSK pain prevalence in ophthalmologists. Pooled estimates with 95% CI were calculated using random-effects models; heterogeneity was quantified using I². MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of overall and site-specific MSK pain; effects on workload and productivity; prevalence of treatment or mitigation strategies. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of any MSK pain was 70% (95% CI: 65%-75%; I² = 92%); neck (41%; 95% CI: 35%-47%; I² = 95%), lower back (36%; 95% CI: 32%-39%; I² = 87%), and shoulder pain (28%; 95% CI: 22%-35%; I² = 91%) were most common. Pain led to workload modification in up to 44% and contributed to reduced clinical volume, sick leave, or contemplation of early retirement. Forty-six percent (95% CI: 22%-71%) pursued no treatment; 39% (95% CI: 30%-49%) used medical therapy; and 29% (95% CI: 20%-41%) sought physiotherapy. Heterogeneity was high across studies, reflecting differing case definitions and self-reported measures. CONCLUSIONS: MSK pain affects most ophthalmologists, particularly in the cervical and lumbar regions and frequently alters practice patterns. These findings underscore the need for early ergonomic training, structured micro-breaks, and workspace redesign. Prospective intervention trials are required to establish causality and quantify benefit.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Biological mechanisms of atropine in myopia control (Review).

Myopia is now recognized as a progressive, potentially sight‑threatening disease rather than just a refractive error, with its prevalence rising rapidly worldwide due to its high occurrence, major vision losses and huge public health cost. The World Health Organization estimates that 2.6 billion individuals in the world were myopic in 2020 this figure is projected to increase to 3.364 billion by 2030. Although myopia may be better controlled in its early stages, it may not be completely reversed at this time. Of all of the methods for controlling myopia, atropine, a muscarinic receptor antagonist, remains an effective pharmacological option for slowing myopia progression in children. However, the mechanisms of action of atropine remain to be fully elucidated. This review provided a systematic review for myopia epidemiology, pathogenesis, the effects and side effects, as well as up‑to‑date possible mechanisms, in the hope of facilitating that researchers in this field elucidate its underlying mechanisms so that clinical ophthalmologists may be able to better control this disease.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Corneal Epithelial Alterations Associated With Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor Therapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

IMPORTANCE: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are standard therapy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative breast cancer. By blocking the G1/S cell-cycle transition, these agents may impair renewal of the corneal epithelium. No controlled study has systematically evaluated corneal epithelial changes in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapy is associated with cornealepithelial alterations independent of aromatase inhibitor exposure and tear film dysfunction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective comparative cross-sectional study at a tertiary ophthalmology center. A total of 132 women were enrolled: 45 receiving a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus an aromatase inhibitor (CDKAI group), 44 receiving aromatase inhibitor monotherapy (AI group), and 43 age-matched postmenopausal controls without systemic oncologic therapy. EXPOSURES: CDK4/6 inhibitor (ribociclib, palbociclib, or abemaciclib) combined with an aromatase inhibitor; aromatase inhibitor alone; or no systemic oncologic therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence and severity of punctate epitheliopathy and vortex keratopathy, assessed by a masked ophthalmologist. Secondary outcomes included Schirmer I test, tear film break-up time, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). RESULTS: PE was present in 44.4% of eyes in the CDKAI group vs 4.7% in the AI group and 2.3% in controls (&#x3c7;&#xb2; = 34.31; P < .001). All moderate (13.3%) and severe/complicated (8.9%) PE cases occurred exclusively in the CDKAI group. Vortex keratopathy was observed in 13.3% of CDKAI patients and in none of the other groups (P = .025). Schirmer values, tear film break-up time, and OSDI scores did not differ among groups (all P > .05). Within the CDKAI group, PE was not associated with treatment duration (P = .963) or tear film parameters. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this comparative study, CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapy was associated with significantly higher prevalence and severity of PE and vortex keratopathy, independent of aromatase inhibitor exposure and in the absence of measurable tear film dysfunction. These findings suggest a direct cytostatic effect on the corneal epithelium. Symptom scores were low, although OSDI interpretation was limited by incomplete responses. Proactive corneal surface evaluation with fluorescein staining may be warranted during CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment.

Humans↗