SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Olanzapine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Preoperative Olanzapine and Quality of Recovery after Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postdischarge nausea and vomiting negatively impact recovery after surgery. Preoperative administration of 10 mg olanzapine decreases postdischarge nausea and vomiting but increases sedation. No data are available on the impact of olanzapine on global quality of recovery. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in female patients 18 to 50 yr old undergoing ambulatory surgery during general anesthesia. Participants received 5 mg oral olanzapine or placebo in addition to antiemetic prophylaxis with dexamethasone and ondansetron. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) on postoperative day (POD) 1. Secondary outcomes included QoR-40 on POD 2, postdischarge nausea (any and severe) through POD 2, and postanesthesia care unit length of stay. QoR-40 analyses used mixed-effects models adjusted for baseline preoperative QoR-40 scores. The group differences and corresponding 95% CI are reported. RESULTS: A total of 384 participants received olanzapine (n = 191) or placebo (n = 193). Compared with placebo, olanzapine was associated with higher QoR-40 scores on POD 1 (difference, 9.0 points; 95% CI, 6.1 to 11.8; P < 0.001). The POD 2 difference was 4.8 points (95% CI, 2.0 to 7.6; nominal P = 0.001), and this secondary outcome remained significant after false discovery rate correction. Olanzapine was associated with lower odds of any nausea (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.66) and severe nausea (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.48) on POD 1. On POD 2, olanzapine was associated with lower odds of any nausea (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.76), but not severe nausea (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.40). Postanesthesia care unit length of stay did not differ between groups. The significance of these prespecified secondary outcomes was unchanged after false discovery rate correction. CONCLUSIONS: When combined with dexamethasone and ondansetron, a single preoperative dose of 5 mg olanzapine improved global quality of recovery after discharge from ambulatory surgery.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of adjunctive memantine on executive function and global cognition in bipolar disorder (BD): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment contributes substantially to disability in bipolar disorder (BD), but effective pharmacologic options remain limited. This trial evaluated whether adjunctive memantine improves global cognition and executive function in BD. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, patients with bipolar I disorder (B1D) receiving lithium and olanzapine were assigned to memantine or placebo. Memantine was titrated to 20 mg/day over 6 weeks. Cognitive outcomes were assessed at baseline, week 6, and week 18. Global cognition was measured with the Neurocognitive Assessment Battery (NuCog), and executive function with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations and Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc tests. RESULTS: Sixty-three participants were randomized (memantine, n = 31; placebo, n = 32), and all completed follow-up. Groups were comparable at baseline for demographic and clinical variables and for most cognitive measures. Both groups improved over time (P < 0.001), but improvement was greater with memantine for global cognition at week 6 (MD = 9.32; 95% CI, 4.84-13.81; P < 0.001) and week 18 (MD = 12.69; 95% CI, 8.67-16.71; P < 0.001). FAB total scores favored memantine at week 18 (MD = 2.68; 95% CI, 1.76-3.61; P < 0.001), but not at week 6. Domain analyses showed significant benefits for NuCog attention, visuoconstructional ability, memory, and executive function, and for several FAB subscales by week 18. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive memantine improved global cognition and, over longer follow-up, executive function in BD. These findings support NMDA receptor modulation as a potential strategy for cognitive dysfunction in BD.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy, acceptability, and related outcomes of pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar mania: a systematic review and dose-related network meta-analysis across different age groups.

BACKGROUND: Acute bipolar mania carries negative social and economic consequences. We investigated the comparative efficacy/response/acceptability of pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar mania, considering dose effects across different age groups. METHODS: We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological interventions with one another or placebo in acute bipolar mania patients, indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus (from inception through 2025.12.24). Co-primary outcomes were change in manic symptoms/response/and acceptability. Tolerability/remission and rate of adverse events were secondary outcomes. Confidence-In-Network-Meta-Analysis was likewise appraised. RESULTS: 113 RCTs, encompassing 49 distinct treatment combinations, included 20,666 participants. Sensitivity analysis retaining only low-risk-of-bias studies and excluding outliers for possible effect modifiers indicated that risperidone 3 mg/day(SMD = -7.57;95%C.I. = -8.25;-5.85); tamoxifen 160 mg/day(SMD = -1.73;95%C.I. = -2.32;-1.13); rivastigmine 3 mg/day(SMD = -1.13;95%C.I. = -1.06;-0.58); haloperidol 30 mg/day(SMD = -0.96;95%C.I. = -1.25;-0.75); valproate 750 mg/day(SMD = -0.76;95%C.I. = -1.48;-0.58); tamoxifen 40 mg/day(SMD = -0.75;95%C.I. = -1.41;-0.59); celecoxib 400 mg/day(SMD = -0.74;95%C.I. = -1.20;-0.38); paliperidone extended-release 12 mg/day(SMD = -0.62; 95%C.I. = -0.91;-0.32); olanzapine 15 mg/day(SMD = -0.59;95%C.I. = -0.60;-0.38); olanzapine 20 mg/day(SMD = -0.52;95%C.I. = -0.66;-0.38); risperidone 4 mg/day(SMD = -0.53;95%C.I. = -0.76;-0.29); allopurinol 600 mg/day(SMD = -0.54;95%C.I. = -0.67;-0.22); cariprazine 12 mg/day(SMD = -0.49;95%C.I. = -0.66;-0.33); risperidone 4.2 mg/day(SMD = -0.46;95%C.I. = -0.75;-0.17); lithium 1500 mg/day(SMD = -0.42;95%C.I. = -0.57;-0.28); ziprasidone 160 mg/day(SMD = -0.49;95%C.I. = -0.68;-0.31); asenapine 20 mg/day(SMD = -0.38;95%C.I. = -0.53;-0.22); haloperidol 8 mg/day(SMD = -0.34;95%C.I. = -0.63;-0.05); aripiprazole 15 mg/day(SMD = -0.33;95%C.I. = -0.61;-0.06) outperformed placebo. Ziprasidone 160 mg/day, celecoxib 200 mg/day, asenapine 20 mg/day, and asenapine 10 mg/day proved more efficacious than placebo in children. No statistically significant differences were reported between treatments and placebo for response/remission/acceptability/tolerability, and manic/hypomanic switch. A meta-regression of efficacy effect sizes against the adapted AMSTAR-Plus content scores showed that larger SMDs were associated with lower AMSTAR scores, indicating lower study quality, warranting further caution for such large efficacy estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with previous NMAs and current guidelines, expanding the current knowledge base while concurrently appraising different drugs, doses, and age groups.

Humans↗