Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Obstetric Surgical Procedures”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[Fistulas in gynecologic and obstetric surgical procedures].

INTRODUCTION: The study pointed to the significance and most frequent causes of development of fistula following gynecologic and obstetric surgical procedures. PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OF FISTULAS: Some possibilities of prevention, i.e. the necessity of correct administration of surgical procedures have been described. The authors pointed to the imperative of knowing the structure of vesicovaginal region and administration of adequate surgical technique. They described surgical procedures in most frequent gynecologic operations in prevention of ureteral injuries. They have presented 25-year result of operative treatment of these patients and treatment of postoperative fistulas at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Novi Sad. In regard to the number of gynecologic operations in that period (23067), the incidence of fistulas was not high (43). CONCLUSION: During the last years, the incidence is constantly decreasing, due to application of appropriate surgical techniques, careful manipulation, and administration of up-to-date surgical materials.

Cesarean Section↗
PubMed1993

Frequency of glove perforations and subsequent blood contact in association with selected obstetric surgical procedures.

OBJECTIVE: One purpose of this prospective investigation was to assess the frequency of glove perforations and subsequent blood contact associated with selected obstetric procedures. The second purpose was to assess the relative risk of perforation among different members of the surgical team and determine if time of day or urgency of the procedure affected the frequency of perforation. STUDY DESIGN: Over a 3-month period, obstetric personnel were asked to double glove for all surgical procedures. After surgery, they placed their gloves in plastic bags and noted the type of procedure, time of day, and position on the surgical team. They also indicated whether they were aware of a glove tear and, if so, whether blood or fluid was on their hands. Gloves were tested for injury by two methods: by inflating them with air and subsequently immersing them in water to detect air bubbles and by directly filling them with water to observe for leaks. RESULTS: A total of 540 glove sets (2160 individual gloves) were examined; 407 sets were from cesarean deliveries, 65 from puerperal tubal ligations, and 68 from vaginal deliveries. Sixty-seven of the sets (12.4%, 95% confidence interval 9.6% to 15.2%) had at least one hole; the total number of holes was 78. Sixty-six holes were in the outer glove only, and 7 were in the inner glove only. In five sets (0.9%, 95% confidence interval 0.5% to 1.3%) there were matching holes in the outer and inner gloves. In two of these cases (0.4%, 95% confidence interval 0.1% to 0.7%) the surgeons noted blood on their hands at the conclusion of the procedure. The difference in frequency of injury in outer versus inner gloves was highly significant (p < 0.005). Forty-six of the 78 holes (59%) were on the thumb or first two fingers of the nondominant hand. Only 2 (3%) of the glove tears were recognized by the surgeon. There was no difference in frequency of glove tears when cesarean sections were classified as urgent versus nonurgent. There also was no difference in frequency of glove tears in procedures performed at night compared with those during the daytime. Surgical nurses had 36% of all glove injuries and were more likely than physicians or medical students to sustain perforations (p < 0.005). Primary surgeons and first assistants were more likely than second assistants to sustain glove injuries (p < 0.05). For primary surgeons and first assistants, level of training did not significantly affect the frequency of glove perforations. CONCLUSIONS: Glove perforations occur in approximately 12% of obstetric surgical procedures. Surgical nurses are at greatest risk for perforation. Double gloving reduces the likelihood of penetrating injury to the inner glove and subsequent risk of blood contact.

Blood↗
PubMed2004

Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the glove perforation rate, efficacy of double gloving, effect of duration of surgery, expertise of surgeon and operative urgency on the glove perforation rate in obstetrical and gynecologic operations. METHODS: From February to September 2002, double glove protocol was made necessary for all major obstetrical and gynecologic procedures. The operating surgeon, first and second assistant were included in the study. Gloves damage was noted (overt by inspection, occult by hydroinsufflation technique). RESULTS: Of the 156 procedures included in study, 32 procedures were performed (all emergency operations) single-gloved because surgeons found double gloving clumsy (56%), made it difficult to tie knots due to lack of dexterity (24%), or were too tight (20%). One thousand one hundred and twenty single gloves were examined after each procedure by hydroinsufflation. The overall perforation rate was 13.6% (single versus double outer gloves, 13.8% versus l3.2%, P > 0.05). Matching perforations were found in six cases (4.6%). Thus, the protection offered by double gloves was 95.4% even if the outer gloves were perforated. Four inner gloves had preexisting perforations. Sixty unused gloves checked similarly revealed a perforation rate of 1.6%. Emergency cases had higher perforation rate compared to elective surgeries (16.6% versus 10.8%, P < 0.00 1). Surgeries lasting for more than 40 min had a higher perforation rate compared to those finished in less than or equal to 40 min (18.6% versus 7.6%, P < 0.001). The middle finger of the left hand was the most commonly involved. The surgeon, first assistant and second assistant were involved in 73.6, 23.3 and 3.2% cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Double gloving offers considerable protection against exposure to contaminants in the blood and body fluids of the patient and should be made routine, especially in developing countries where HIV, hepatitis B and C are widely prevalent. Double gloving should be made mandatory in emergency procedures, which have a higher perforation rate due to operative urgency, and gloves should be changed in operations lasting for more than 40 min to ensure integrity of barrier.

Equipment Failure↗
PubMed2003

A study of the incidence and recognition of surgical glove perforation during obstetric and gynecological procedures.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of surgical glove perforation among obstetric and gynecological surgical procedures, and to evaluate surgeons' perceptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in which nursing personnel examined the gloves used in obstetric and gynecological procedures, immediately after the surgery, in order to detect perforations. RESULTS: Surgical glove perforation occurred in 20.8% of 817 obstetrics procedures and 24.4% of 131 gynecology procedures. The observed difference between groups was not statistically significant (p=0.35). Obstetricians perceived the occurrence of perforation in 30.6% of the events, and gynecologists in 37.5%. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.44).

Brazil↗
PubMed1991

Urological injuries during obstetric and gynaecological surgical procedures.

Urological injuries during obstetric and gynaecological operations carried out between Jan. '88 to Dec. '88, at a hospital involved in resident teaching programmes were analysed retrospectively. Each case was reviewed for predisposing factors, location and type of injury, time and method of recognition and management. Fifteen injuries were documented in 892 gynaecological procedures and 296 obstetric procedures. Twelve injuries occurred during gynaecological operations whereas 3 occurred during obstetric operations. Thirteen were bladder injuries and two were ureteric injuries. Infiltrating carcinoma of cervix, pelvic adhesions, adhesions because of previous operations and distorted anatomy, were the important risk factors.

Female↗
PubMed2002

U.S. trends in obstetric procedures, 1990-2000.

BACKGROUND: During the 1980s the rate of obstetric procedures performed during delivery rose precipitously. This study follows the use of obstetric procedures through the 1990s to explore whether the patterns witnessed in the previous decade continued through the next. METHODS: Data on total obstetric procedures and eight specific procedures (cesarean section, medical and surgical induction of labor, other artificial rupture of membranes, episiotomy, repair of current obstetric laceration, vacuum extraction, forceps delivery) were obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Survey, a nationally representative survey of discharges from short-stay non-Federal hospitals. Approximately 32,000 records for women with deliveries were included in the survey each year. RESULTS: The total rate of all obstetric procedures did not change significantly from 1990 through 2000. However, as during the 1980s, rates increased for induction of labor, vacuum extraction, and repair of current obstetric laceration. Rates decreased for forceps delivery and episiotomy, also continuing 1980s trends. After a long period of increase, the rate of cesarean section declined from 1988 to 1995 but increased again from 1995 to 2000. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike the 1980s, the overall rate of obstetric procedures did not increase from 1990 to 2000, but the mix of obstetric procedures performed continued to change during this period.

Cesarean Section↗
PubMed1988

Multidisciplinary program for promoting single prophylactic doses of cefazolin in obstetrical and gynecological surgical procedures.

A multidisciplinary cost-containment program for promoting the use of single prophylactic doses of cefazolin for obstetrical and gynecological surgical procedures is described. Following a one-month review of patient charts to identify the antimicrobial regimens used most frequently for prophylaxis in obstetrical and gynecological surgical procedures, the department of pharmacy services, with the cooperation of the pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committee and the departments of obstetrics and gynecology and infectious diseases, implemented an educational program to promote the use of single doses of cefazolin for surgical prophylaxis. The program included inservice education and distribution of letters of support and a therapeutics newsletter. Drug stocking patterns in the operating and delivery rooms were changed to make cefazolin more accessible, and the P&T committee formally restricted the use of prophylactic antimicrobial agents in obstetrical and gynecological surgical procedures to single doses of cefazolin unless a consulting infectious-disease physician recommended otherwise. Compliance with the program increased as each step was implemented; data collected 16 months after the program was initiated demonstrated a compliance rate of 78.8%. Based on comparison of data collected before initiation and six months after initiation of the program, an actual cost savings of +7,125 was realized, which extrapolates to +14,250 annually. No apparent adverse effects on patient care were noted. The multidisciplinary approach to promoting the use of single doses of cefazolin was effective.

Cefazolin↗
PubMed2002

Rates of postoperative complications among human immunodeficiency virus-infected women who have undergone obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures.

Clinical observations indicate that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive women experience more postoperative problems than do HIV-negative women. To obtain a better estimate of the individual risk of postoperative morbidity among HIV-infected women, and to determine which procedures pose the greatest risk, we performed a retrospective case-control study in which we assessed the outcomes after 235 obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures. For purposes of comparison, an HIV-negative control patient was matched for each of the 235 surgical procedures performed, on the basis of the type of procedure and patient age. We found a significantly greater number of postoperative complications among the HIV-positive women. Higher complication rates occurred after abdominal surgery (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; P=.001) and curettage (OR, 7.7; P=.06). Among HIV-infected women, the risk of complications was associated with immune status. Antiretroviral therapy and standard perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis did not decrease the risk of complications. Indications for performing abdominal surgery and curettage on HIV-infected women should be carefully weighed against the potential risk of postoperative complications.

Adult↗