Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 1”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Dissociation of steroid receptor coactivator 1 and nuclear receptor corepressor recruitment to the human glucocorticoid receptor by modification of the ligand-receptor interface: the role of tyrosine 735.

Within the human glucocorticoid receptor (GR) steroid binding pocket, tyrosine 735 makes hydrophobic contact with the steroid D ring. Substitution of tyrosine735 selectively impairs glucocorticoid transactivation but not transrepression. We now show, using both mammalian two-hybrid and glutathione-S-transferase pull downs, that such substitutions reduce interaction with steroid receptor coactivator 1, both basally and in response to agonist binding. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen we identified one of the three nuclear receptor interacting domains (NCoR-N1) of nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR) as interacting with the GR C terminus in an RU486-specific manner. This was confirmed in mammalian two-hybrid experiments, and so we used the NCoR-N1 peptide to probe the GR C-terminal conformation. Substitution of Tyr735phe, Tyr735val, and Tyr735 ser, which impaired steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC1) interaction, enhanced NCoR-N1 recruitment, basally and after RU486. RU486 did not direct SRC1 recruitment to any of the GR constructs, and dexamethasone did not allow NCoR-N1 recruitment. Using a glutathione-S-transferase pull-down approach, the NCoR-N1 peptide was found to bind the full-length GR constitutively, and no further induction was seen with RU486, but it was reduced by dexamethasone. As both SRC1 and NCoR are predicted to recognize a common hydrophobic cleft in the GR, it seems that changes favorable to one interaction are detrimental to the other, thus identifying a molecular switch.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Transcriptional intermediary factor 1alpha mediates physical interaction and functional synergy between the coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 and glucocorticoid receptor-interacting protein 1 nuclear receptor coactivators.

In previous studies transcriptional intermediary factor 1alpha (TIF1alpha) was identified as a direct binding partner and potential transcriptional coactivator for nuclear receptors (NRs) but its overexpression inhibited, rather than enhanced, transcriptional activation by NRs. Here we show that TIF1alpha bound to and enhanced the function of the C-terminal activation domain (AD) of coactivator associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) and the N-terminal AD of glucocorticoid receptor-interacting protein 1 (GRIP1). Furthermore, although TIF1alpha had little or no NR coactivator activity by itself, it cooperated synergistically with GRIP1 and CARM1 to enhance NR-mediated transcription. Inhibition of endogenous TIF1alpha expression reduced transcriptional activation by the GRIP1 N-terminal domain but not by the CARM1 C-terminal domain, suggesting that TIF1alpha may be more important for mediating the activity of the former than the latter. Reduction of endogenous TIF1alpha levels also compromised the androgen-dependent induction of an endogenous target gene of the androgen receptor. Finally, TIF1alpha formed a ternary complex with the GRIP1 N-terminal and CARM1 C-terminal domains. Thus, we conclude that TIF1alpha cooperates with NR coactivators GRIP1 and CARM1 by forming a stable ternary complex with them and enhancing the AD function of one or both of them.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

AF-2 activity and recruitment of steroid receptor coactivator 1 to the estrogen receptor depend on a lysine residue conserved in nuclear receptors.

Hormone-dependent transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors depends on the presence of a conserved C-terminal amphipathic alpha-helix (helix 12) in the ligand-binding domain. Here we show that a lysine residue, which is conserved in most nuclear receptors in the predicted helix 3, is also required for estrogen-dependent transactivation. The replacement of lysine 366 with alanine appreciably reduced activation function 2 (AF-2) activity without affecting steroid- or DNA-binding activity in the mouse estrogen receptor. The mutation dramatically reduced the ability of the receptor to bind steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1) but had no effect on receptor-interacting protein 140 (RIP-140) binding, indicating that while their sites of interaction overlap, they are not entirely consistent and in keeping with the proposal that the recruitment of coactivators, such as SRC-1, is required for AF-2 activity. Although the function of RIP-140 remains to be established, RIP-140 appears to be capable of recruiting the basal transcription machinery, since overexpression of the protein markedly increased the transcriptional activity of the mutant receptor. Since the lysine residue is conserved, we propose that it is required, together with residues in helix 12, to form the surface by which members of the nuclear receptor family interact with coactivators.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed1998

A regulatory role for RIP140 in nuclear receptor activation.

Transcriptional regulation of gene expression by nuclear receptors requires negatively and positively acting cofactors. Recent models for receptor activation propose that certain receptors in the absence of ligands can recruit corepressors while ligand binding results in conformational changes leading to the recruitment of coactivators. Previous work has established a coactivator role for the SRC-1 family members as well as an involvement of the coactivators CBP/p300 in nuclear receptor signaling. However, in addition to coactivators, ligand-activated nuclear receptors bind a number of different proteins that possibly serve other functions. Using peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPAR alpha) as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screening, we have isolated nuclear factor RIP140 whose function in receptor activation is unclear. We now report a detailed characterization of RIP140 action with a focus on the retinoid X receptor (RXR) heterodimeric receptors PPAR and thyroid hormone receptor (TR). We show that putative PPAR ligands enhance the interaction of RIP140 with the rat PPAR subtypes alpha and gamma in solution but not with PPAR/RXR heterodimers on DNA. However, RIP140 forms ternary complexes in the presence of RXR ligands. Similar experiments with TR support the high affinity of RIP140 to the RXR subunit and also suggest that either partner in the TR/RXR heterodimer can independently respond to ligand. Coactivation experiments in yeast and mammalian cells confirm the coactivator role for SRC-1, but not for RIP140. We provide important evidence that the in vitro binding of RIP140 and SRC-1 to nuclear receptors is competitive. Since RIP140 generally down-regulates receptor activity in mammalian cells and specifically down-regulates coactivation mediated by SRC-1, we propose a model in which RIP140 indirectly regulates nuclear receptor AF-2 activity by competition for coactivators such as SRC-1.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2004

Estrogen response element-dependent regulation of transcriptional activation of estrogen receptors alpha and beta by coactivators and corepressors.

One mechanism by which ligand-activated estrogen receptors alpha and beta (ERalpha and ERbeta) stimulate gene transcription is through direct ER interaction with specific DNA sequences, estrogen response elements (EREs). ERE-bound ER recruits coactivators that stimulate gene transcription. Binding of ER to natural and synthetic EREs with different nucleotide sequences alters ER binding affinity, conformation, and transcriptional activity, indicating that the ERE sequence is an allosteric effector of ER action. Here we tested the hypothesis that alterations in ER conformation induced by binding to different ERE sequences modulates ER interaction with coactivators and corepressors. CHO-K1 cells transfected with ERalpha or ERbeta show ERE sequence-dependent differences in the functional interaction of ERalpha and ERbeta with coactivators steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1), SRC-2 (glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP1)), SRC-3 amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) and ACTR, cyclic AMP binding protein (CBP), and steroid receptor RNA activator (SRA), corepressors nuclear receptor co-repressor (NCoR) and silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT), and secondary coactivators coactivator associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) and protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1). We note both ligand-independent as well estradiol- and 4-hydroxytamoxifen-dependent differences in ER-coregulator activity. In vitro ER-ERE binding assays using receptor interaction domains of these coregulators failed to recapitulate the cell-based results, substantiating the importance of the full-length proteins in regulating ER activity. These data demonstrated that the ERE sequence impacts estradiol-and 4-hydroxytamoxifen-occupied ERalpha and ERbeta interaction with coregulators as measured by transcriptional activity in mammalian cells.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1999

The AF1 and AF2 domains of the androgen receptor interact with distinct regions of SRC1.

The androgen receptor is unusual among nuclear receptors in that most, if not all, of its activity is mediated via the constitutive activation function in the N terminus. Here we demonstrate that p160 coactivators such as SRC1 (steroid receptor coactivator 1) interact directly with the N terminus in a ligand-independent manner via a conserved glutamine-rich region between residues 1053 and 1123. Although SRC1 is capable of interacting with the ligand-binding domain by means of LXXLL motifs, this interaction is not essential since an SRC1 mutant with no functional LXXLL motifs retains its ability to potentiate androgen receptor activity. In contrast, mutants lacking the glutamine-rich region are inactive, indicating that this region is both necessary and sufficient for recruitment of SRC1 to the androgen receptor. This recruitment is in direct contrast to the recruitment of SRC1 to the estrogen receptor, which requires interaction with the ligand-binding domain.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed1999

Constitutive activation of transcription and binding of coactivator by estrogen-related receptors 1 and 2.

In this report, we demonstrate that, in contrast to most previously characterized nuclear receptors, hERR1 and hERR2 (human estrogen receptor-related protein 1 and -2) are constitutive activators of the classic estrogen response element (ERE) as well as the palindromic thyroid hormone response element (TRE(pal)) but not the glucocorticoid response element (GRE). This intrinsically activated state of hERR1 and hERR2 resides in the ligand-binding domains of the two genes and is transferable to a heterologous receptor. In addition, we show that members of the p160 family of nuclear receptor coactivators, ACTR (activator of thyroid and retinoic acid receptors), GRIP1 (glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1), and SRC-1 (steroid receptor coactivator 1), potentiate the transcriptional activity by hERR1 and hERR2 in mammalian cells, and that both orphan receptors bind the coactivators in a ligand-independent manner. Together, these results suggest that hERR1 and hERR2 activate gene transcription through a mechanism different from most of the previously characterized steroid hormone receptors.

Acetyltransferases↗
PubMed2000

p300 mediates functional synergism between AF-1 and AF-2 of estrogen receptor alpha and beta by interacting directly with the N-terminal A/B domains.

Estrogen receptor (ER) alpha and beta mediate estrogen actions in target cells through transcriptional control of target gene expression. For 17beta-estradiol-induced transactivation, the N-terminal A/B domain (AF-1) and the C-terminal E/F domain (AF-2) of ERs are required. Ligand binding is considered to induce functional synergism between AF-1 and AF-2, but the molecular mechanism remains unknown. To clarify this synergism, we studied the role of reported AF-2 coactivators, p300/CREB binding protein, steroid receptor coactivator-1/transcriptional intermediary factor-2 (SRC-1/TIF2) family proteins and thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein-220/(vitamin D3 receptor-interacting protein- 205-(TRAP220/DRIP205) on the AF-1 activity in terms of synergism with the AF-2 function. We found that neither any of the SRC-1/TIF2 family coactivators nor TRAP220/DRIP205 is potent, whereas p300 potentiates the AF-1 function of both human ERalpha and human ERbeta. Direct interactions of p300 with the A/B domains of ERalpha and ERbeta were observed in an in vitro glutathione S-transferase pull-down assay in accordance with the interactions in yeast and mammalian two-hybrid assays. Furthermore, mutations in the p300 binding sites (56-72 amino acids in ERalpha and 62-72 amino acids in ERbeta) in the A/B domains caused a reduction in ligand-induced transactivation functions of both ERalpha and ERbeta. Thus, these findings indicate that ligand-induced functional synergism between AF-1 and AF-2 is mediated through p300 by its direct binding to the A/B regions of ERalpha and ERbeta.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Regulation of ligand-induced heterodimerization and coactivator interaction by the activation function-2 domain of the vitamin D receptor.

Twenty-epi analogs of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25D3) are 100-1000 times more potent transcriptionally than the natural hormone. To determine whether this enhanced activity is mediated through modulation of the dimerization process or through interaction with coactivators, we performed quantitative protein-protein interaction assays with in vitro translated vitamin D receptor (ivtVDR) and fusion proteins containing glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and either the ligand-binding domain of retinoid X receptor (RXRalpha), or the nuclear receptor-interacting domain of the steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1), or the glucocorticoid receptor-interacting protein 1 (GRIP-1). We found that heterodimerization of the ligand-binding domains of RXRalpha and VDR was primarily deltanoid dependent as was the interaction of VDR with the SRC-1 or with GRIP-1. The ED50 for induction of heterodimerization was 2 nM for 1,25D3 and 0.05 nM for 20-epi-1,25D3. However, the ED50 for induction of VDR interaction with SRC-1 was similar for both 1,25D3 and the 20-epi analog (ED50 = 0.7-1.0 nM) as was the ED50 for ligand-mediated interaction of VDR with GRIP-1 (ED50 = 0.1-0.3 nM). Mutations in heptad 9 diminished both 1,25D3 and the 20-epi analog-mediated dimerization, without changing binding of these ligands to VDR. Mutations in VDR's activation function 2 (AF-2) domain/helix 12 residues diminished the ability of 1,25D3 to induce heterodimerization and interaction with SRC-1. These mutations did not change the ability of 20-epi-1,25D3 to induce dimerization but did diminish its ability to induce interaction with SRC-1. We hypothesize that both the hormone and the analog stabilize receptor conformations that expose VDR's functional interfaces. The mechanisms by which the two ligands expose these functional interfaces differ with respect to participation of the AF-2 domain.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

A mechanism for androgen receptor-mediated prostate cancer recurrence after androgen deprivation therapy.

The development and growth of prostate cancer depends on the androgen receptor and its high-affinity binding of dihydrotestosterone, which derives from testosterone. Most prostate tumors regress after therapy to prevent testosterone production by the testes, but the tumors eventually recur and cause death. A critical question is whether the androgen receptor mediates recurrent tumor growth after androgen deprivation therapy. Here we report that a majority of recurrent prostate cancers express high levels of the androgen receptor and two nuclear receptor coactivators, transcriptional intermediary factor 2 and steroid receptor coactivator 1. Overexpression of these coactivators increases androgen receptor transactivation at physiological concentrations of adrenal androgen. Furthermore, we provide a molecular basis for this activation and suggest a general mechanism for recurrent prostate cancer growth.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Titration by estrogen receptor activation function-2 of targets that are downstream from coactivators.

Cross-interference (squelching) among nuclear receptors has been proposed to reflect the titration of coactivators that bind the receptors in a hormone-dependent manner. We have tested whether the coactivators are the only target titrated during squelching of one receptor by another, or whether proteins needed for coactivator function are titrated as well. That the coactivators are indeed one target of squelching is apparent. The isolated ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor (ER-LBD) squelches transcriptional activation by the thyroid hormone receptor (TR) only when the LBD is bound to ligands that promote coactivator interactions and only when regions of the LBD that promote coactivator interactions are undisturbed. Furthermore, the ER-LBD and the TR compete in vitro for the related p160 coactivators, SRC1a and GRIP1 (glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1), or the putative corepressor, RIP140. Finally TR action becomes more potent when coactivator levels are raised. Nonetheless, supplying excess SRC1a or GRIP1 does not abolish squelching by the ER. In fact, squelching becomes even more severe when coactivators are abundant. Supplying combinations of coactivators from the p160 class and the CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300 class makes squelching most severe. Elevated RIP140 inhibits TR action, but also protects the residual TR action from squelching by the ER-LBD. We conclude that ER-LBD squelches TR both by titrating p160-CBP coactivators and additionally by cooperating with the coactivators to titrate a second factor. The second factor would be needed by the TR for coactivator-mediated transcriptional stimulation.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2005

Differential recruitment of p160 coactivators by glucocorticoid receptor between Schwann cells and astrocytes.

In the nervous system, glucocorticoids can exert beneficial or noxious effects, depending on their concentration and the duration of hormonal stimulation. They exert their effects on neuronal and glial cells by means of their cognate receptor, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), which recruits the p160 coactivator family members SRC-1 (steroid receptor coactivator 1), SRC-2, and SRC-3 after hormone binding. In this study, we investigated the molecular pathways used by the GR in cultured glial cells of the central and the peripheral nervous systems, astrocytes and Schwann cells (MSC80 cells), respectively. We performed functional studies based on transient transfection of a minimal glucocorticoid-sensitive reporter gene into the glial cells to test the influence of overexpression or selective inhibition by short interfering RNA of the three p160 coactivator family members on GR transactivation. We demonstrate that, depending on the glial cell type, GR differentially recruits p160 family members: in Schwann cells, GR recruited SRC-1a, SRC-1e, or SRC-3, whereas in astrocytes, SRC-1e and SRC-2, and to a lesser extent SRC-3, were active toward GR signaling. The C-terminal nuclear receptor-interacting domain of SRC-1a participates in its exclusion from the GR transcriptional complex in astrocytes. Immunolocalization experiments revealed a cell-specific intracellular distribution of the p160s, which was dependent on the duration of the hormonal induction. For example, within astrocytes, SRC-1 and SRC-2 were mainly nuclear, whereas SRC-3 unexpectedly localized to the lumen of the Golgi apparatus. In contrast, in Schwann cells, SRC-1 showed a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling depending on hormonal stimulation, whereas SRC-2 remained strictly nuclear and SRC-3 remained predominantly cytoplasmic. Altogether, these results highlight the cell specificity and the time dependence of p160s recruitment by the activated GR in glial cells, revealing the complexity of GR-p160 assembly in the nervous system.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed1999

New screening methods for chemicals with hormonal activities using interaction of nuclear hormone receptor with coactivator.

The endocrine system exerts important functions in a multitude of physiological processes including embryogenesis, differentiation, and homeostasis. Xenobiotics may modify natural endocrine function and so affect human health and wildlife. It is necessary, therefore, to understand the degree to which xenobiotics can disrupt endocrine systems. The key targets of endocrine disruptors are nuclear hormone receptors, which bind to steroid hormones and regulate their gene transcription. We have developed relevant assay systems based on the ligand-dependent interaction between nuclear hormone receptor and coactivator. The coactivators used in this study contained CBP, p300, RIP140, SRC1, TIF1, and TIF2. By two hybrid assay in yeast, the interactions of estrogen receptor with RIP140, SRC1, TIF1, and TIF2 were detected and they were completely dependent on the presence of estrogen. Specificity of this assay was assessed by determining the effect of steroids, known estrogen receptor agonists, and phytoestrogens. The pattern of response to chemicals were consistent with estrogenic activity measured by other assay systems, indicating that this assay system is reliable for measuring estrogenic activity. In addition, we carried out in vitro binding studies: GST pull-down assay and surface plasmon resonance analysis. The estrogen receptor also bound to coactivator in response to chemicals depending on their estrogenic activity in vitro. These data demonstrate that the measurement of interaction between steroid hormone receptor and coactivator serves as a useful tool for identifying chemicals that interact with steroid receptors.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed1997

A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors.

The binding of lipophilic hormones, retinoids and vitamins to members of the nuclear-receptor superfamily modifies the DNA-binding and transcriptional properties of these receptors, resulting in the activation or repression of target genes. Ligand binding induces conformational changes in nuclear receptors and promotes their association with a diverse group of nuclear proteins, including SRC-1/p160, TIF-2/GRIP-1 and CBP/p300 which function as co-activators of transcription, and RIP-140, TIF-1 and TRIP-1/SUG-1 whose functions are unclear. Here we report that a short sequence motif LXXLL (where L is leucine and X is any amino acid) present in RIP-140, SRC-1 and CBP is necessary and sufficient to mediate the binding of these proteins to liganded nuclear receptors. We show that the ability of SRC-1 to bind the oestrogen receptor and enhance its transcriptional activity is dependent upon the integrity of the LXXLL motifs and on key hydrophobic residues in a conserved helix (helix 12) of the oestrogen receptor that are required for its ligand-induced activation function. We propose that the LXXLL motif is a signature sequence that facilitates the interaction of different proteins with nuclear receptors, and is thus a defining feature of a new family of nuclear proteins.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2000

Expression of estrogen receptor coactivators in the rat uterus.

Nuclear receptor coactivators associate in a ligand-dependent manner with estrogen receptors (ER) and other nuclear receptors, and they enhance ligand-dependent transcriptional activation. This study examined basal coactivator expression in rat uterus to investigate if expression of these genes is regulated by estradiol-17 beta or tamoxifen. Ovariectomized mature and immature rats were injected with estradiol-17 beta, tamoxifen, or vehicle (i.e., sesame oil) alone. Uteri were collected and analyzed for changes in coactivator mRNA expression using Northern blot and in situ hybridization analyses. Constitutive uterine mRNA expression of switch protein for antagonist (SPA), SRC-1, GRIP1, RAC3, RIP140, and p300 mRNAs was observed in control uteri, and treatment with ER ligands did not alter coactivator mRNA levels. The data suggest that expression of these coactivator genes is not sensitive to estradiol or tamoxifen in the rat uterus. No cell type-specific pattern of expression was apparent in uterine sections from mature and immature rats; however, silver grains were more abundant in luminal and glandular epithelial cells compared with the stroma and myometrium, indicating that coactivator mRNA levels vary among the uterine compartments. Thus, to our knowledge, we show for the first time that there is constitutive expression of several uterine nuclear receptor coactivators in a physiological setting that remains insensitive to estrogenic regulation. Furthermore, we speculate that higher constitutive levels of coactivator expression in glandular and luminal epithelial cells may be associated with increased hormonal responsiveness by these uterine compartments.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed1999

Regulation of estrogen receptor activation of the prolactin enhancer/promoter by antagonistic activation function-2-interacting proteins.

Transcriptional responses to estrogens are controlled by the cell- and gene-specific interactions of the nuclear estrogen receptor (ER) with cofactors and other transcription factors. The pituitary-specific PRL enhancer/promoter is regulated by estrogens only when it is bound by both ER and the pituitary-specific transcription factor, Pit-1. Cooperative ER/Pit-1 activation of the dormant PRL enhancer/promoter in pituitary progenitor cells requires the estrogen-dependent activation function-2 (AF-2) of ER, but is inhibited by one AF-2-interacting cofactor, RIP140. Here, the complex actions of RIP140 and other AF-2-interacting proteins at the PRL enhancer/promoter were shown to operate via ER itself. RIP140 inhibition of ER/Pit-1 activation in the absence of AF-1 and RIP140 inhibition of both ER alpha and ER beta cooperative activation with Pit-1 suggested a conserved ER site for RIP140 action, possibly AF-2. Coexpression of other AF-2-interacting proteins, including the p160 factors, steroid receptor coactivator-1a (SRC-1a) and glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein-1 (GRIP1), had negligible effects on ER alpha/Pit-1 cooperative activation, but partially relieved RIP140 inhibition. Relief of RIP140 inhibition required the AF-2-binding, LXXLL motifs in SRC-1a and GRIP1. An ER AF-2 mutant that selectively blocked ER interaction with p160s, but not RIP140, still cooperated with Pit-1 and was inhibited by RIP140, but was not relieved by SRC-1a or GRIP1 expression. Thus, SRC-1a and GRIP1 binding to AF-2 counteracted the inhibition of ER/Pit-1 activation by another AF-2-interacting protein, RIP140. Complex, sometimes antagonistic, actions of different classes of AF-2-interacting proteins may play an important role in the cell- and gene-specific estrogen regulation of PRL and other genes.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2000

Synergistic, p160 coactivator-dependent enhancement of estrogen receptor function by CARM1 and p300.

Members of the p160 coactivator family (steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP1), and activator of thyroid and retinoic acid receptors (ACTR)) mediate transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors. After being recruited to the promoter by nuclear receptors, the p160 coactivator transmits the activating signal via two C-terminal activation domains, AD1 and AD2. AD1 is a binding site for the related coactivators cAMP-response element binding protein binding protein (CBP) and p300, whereas AD2 binds to another coactivator, coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1), a protein-arginine methyltransferase. The current study explored the cooperative functional and mechanistic relationships among GRIP1, CARM1, and p300 in transient transfection assays, where they enhanced the ability of the estrogen receptor (ER) to activate transcription of a reporter gene. The coactivator functions of p300 and CARM1 depended on the co-expression of GRIP1. Simultaneous co-expression of all three coactivators caused a synergistic enhancement of ER function. Deletion of the AD1 domain of GRIP1 abolished the ability of p300 to potentiate ER activity but had no effect on CARM1-mediated stimulation. In contrast, when the AD2 domain of GRIP1 was deleted, p300 still stimulated ER function through the mutant GRIP1, but CARM1 failed to do so. Thus, both binding of p300 to AD1 and binding of CARM1 to AD2 are required for their respective coactivator functions and for their synergy. Furthermore, CARM1 and p300 function independently through different activating domains of GRIP1, and their synergy suggests that they enhance transcription by different, complementary mechanisms.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2000

Coactivator and corepressor gene expression in rat cerebellum during postnatal development and the effect of altered thyroid status.

Thyroid hormone (TH) plays an important role in the postnatal development of the rodent cerebellum, particularly within the first 2 weeks of postnatal life. This action is exerted through the regulation of specific genes during development and is mediated by coactivator and corepressor proteins that determine transcriptional repression or activation, respectively. Thus, we hypothesized that the effect of TH on rodent cerebellar development could be influenced by the relative amounts of coactivator and corepressor proteins in vivo. These ratios might be modulated in an age-specific manner and/or by hormones to generate the "critical period" of TH action. To examine this hypothesis, we cloned rat complementary DNA fragments corresponding to coactivators (SRC1, TIF2 and TRAM1) and corepressors (N-CoR and SMRT), and studied the ontogenic changes in their corresponding messenger RNAs in rat cerebellum of normal and hypothyroid rats during postnatal development, using a RNase protection assay. We found an increased expression of SRC1 and TIF2, as well as of N-CoR, during rat cerebellar development but no change in the expression of SMRT and TRAM1 genes. However, thyroid hormone status did not affect the expression of coactivator and corepressor genes in the cerebellum. These results indicate that coactivator and corepressor messenger RNAs exhibit differential expression through cerebellar development but are not regulated by TH during this period.

Aging↗