Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Nerve Transfer”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus avulsion injury: comparing spinal accessory nerve transfer with intercostal nerve transfer.

This study was performed to compare the clinical outcome of 2 types of commonly used nerve transfers, the spinal accessory nerve transfer and the intercostal nerve transfer. This study was a prospective randomized parallel trial involving 205 patients presenting between 1989 and 1994. All patients were males ranging in age from 16 to 43 years. All patients underwent surgery within 6 months of injury. Spinal accessory nerve transfer was performed in 130 patients; better results were obtained in terms of less operative time, fewer blood transfusions, fewer immediate complications, and better motor function (very good and good power in 83% of patients). Intercostal nerve transfer was performed in 75 patients; better results were observed in terms of earlier electromyographic evidence of motor reinnervation, improvement in protective sensation, and reduction of pain. However, very good and good motor recovery was observed in only 64% of patients. There was no significant difference with regard to tidal volume, vital capacity, and the FEV1 to FEV ratio before and after surgery in either group. Smoking adversely affected the rate of recovery. Spinal accessory nerve transfer should be used when motor function of the elbow flexors is the major concern. Intercostal nerve transfer should be performed in patients who need both motor and sensory reconstruction and in those who have chronic pain syndrome after brachial plexus injury.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Brachial plexus avulsion injury repairs with nerve transfers and nerve grafts directly implanted into the spinal cord yield partial recovery of shoulder and elbow movements.

OBJECTIVE: Complete avulsion of the brachial plexus is a devastating injury that primarily affects young adults. The current treatment is based on nerve transfers, which yield very limited recovery. In this study, brachial plexus injuries were repaired with nerve transfers and nerve grafts directly implanted into the spinal cord. METHODS: Eight patients with complete brachial plexus avulsion injuries were surgically treated. Roots or target nerves of the brachial plexus were repaired with peripheral nerve grafts directly implanted into the spinal cord and with extraplexal nerve transfers. RESULTS: Muscle reinnervation was observed for six patients who received spinal implants. Among those patients, one recovered M4 muscle power. Reinnervation was observed only in proximal upper limb muscles. CONCLUSION: Muscle reinnervation through nerve grafts directly implanted into the spinal cord was demonstrated. It seems that the combination of intra- and extradural neurotizations improves the proximal muscle function results. However, the extent of this improvement is limited and, in our opinion, does not justify the use of spinal implants.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Intercostal nerve transfer to lumbar nerve roots. Part II: Neuropathologic findings in the animal model.

These are the neuropathologic findings in dogs 8-11 months after a unilateral intercostal nerve transfer and anastomosis to a lumbar nerve root were performed. This is a follow-up study of a procedure that was initially carried out in the adult and infant human cadaver and subsequently in an animal model by Malik and Buhr, as reported in this issue of Spine. At the time of sacrifice, the animals in this study had lost the limp that they had postoperatively. The results demonstrate the viability of the intercostal nerve transfer and its anastomosis to the lumbar motor root. There was supplied by a lumbar nerve root that had been operated upon, but the basis of this was not definitely established.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Comparative experimental study on treatment outcome of nerve transfer, using selective C7 nerve root vs. phrenic nerve.

The treatment outcome of nerve transfer using the C7 nerve root or phrenic nerve was compared in a rat experiment. One hundred and twenty SD rats were divided into two groups, one undergoing phrenic nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve, and the other partial ipsilateral C7 (anteriolateral fascicles of the anterior division) to the musculocutaneous nerve. Neurotization outcomes of the two groups were evaluated by comparing the electrophysiologic, histologic, and myophysiologic changes of the biceps muscle. No significant differences were found between parameters from the phrenic nerve transfer group and those from the ipsilateral C7 nerve transfer group. This indicates that the treatment outcome of selective ipsilateral C7 transfer is comparable to that of phrenic nerve transfer. It is the surgery of choice in treating brachial plexus upper-trunk avulsion accompanied by phrenic nerve injury.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Shoulder muscle reconstruction in the upper type of the brachial plexus injury by partial radial nerve transfer to the axillary nerve.

Brachial plexus palsy with upper segment C5 and C6 root avulsion can be effectively treated using a part of the radial nerve transferred to the axillary nerve. Shoulder stability and abduction was obtained with good deltoid muscle contraction. When combined with spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve, the overall functional result was enhanced. Elbow flexion can be reconstructed by partial median nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve. There were no neurologic deficits after nerve surgery.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1995

Restoration of shoulder abduction by nerve transfer in avulsed brachial plexus injury: evaluation of 99 patients with various nerve transfers.

During the 5-year period between 1987 and 1991, 99 patients with total root or upper root (C5, C6, or C7) injuries were treated by nerve transfer to obtain shoulder abduction. More than eight different combinations of coaptation between donor nerves (intercostal nerves, phrenic nerve, spinal accessory nerve, ipsilateral C7, or cervical motor nerves) and recipient nerves (suprascapular nerve, axillary nerve, and upper trunk or C5) were applied. All patients had at least 2 years of follow-up. Different results were obtained in each category. Simultaneous neurotization of the suprascapular and axillary nerves with the phrenic and spinal accessory nerves obtained much better and more reliable shoulder abduction. Neurotization of the C5 spinal nerve by multiple nerve transfers was another good option that yielded good shoulder abduction in a single patient. If the phrenic nerve was traumatized, neurotization of the suprascapular nerve solely with the spinal accessory nerve was still capable of achieving an acceptable range of shoulder abduction.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Intercostal nerve transfer of the musculocutaneous nerve in avulsed brachial plexus injuries: evaluation of 66 patients.

Intercostal nerve transfer is a well-established and effective technique for irreparable avulsed brachial plexus injuries. Between 1987 and 1989, 66 patients with brachial plexus injuries were treated by means of intercostal nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve, with or without nerve grafts to obtain elbow flexion. The results were evaluated. Five clinical signs--(1) induction of chest pain by squeezing of biceps, (2) proximal biceps contraction, (3) distal biceps contraction, (4) active elbow flexion against gravity, and (5) active elbow flexion against weight--were identified and used as a guide for functional recovery. The overall success rate with motor function of grade 4 or more was 67%. The motor results were better in 1989 (81%) because of greater familiarity with the anatomy and improved surgical technique. The important factors in obtaining a good result are (1) early exploration (less than 5 months after trauma), (2) use of three intercostal nerves, (3) mixed nerve-to-mixed nerve coaptation, (4) nerve repair without grafts and under no tension, and (5) shoulder stability.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Results of nerve transfers to the musculocutaneous and axillary nerves.

OBJECTIVE: Nerve transfers in cases of brachial plexus traction injuries with avulsion of spinal nerve roots or irreparable proximal lesions of spinal nerves have been attempted using a variety of donor nerves. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of nerve transfers to the musculocutaneous and axillary nerves, using collateral branches of the brachial plexus, upper intercostal nerves, or the accessory nerve. METHODS: This study included 62 patients with brachial plexus traction injuries who were surgically treated using various nerve transfer techniques. The follow-up periods were at least 3 years. Analysis of motor recovery was performed according to the type of donor nerve, the age of the patient, and the timing of surgery. RESULTS: The rates of recovery for the musculocutaneous and axillary nerves were 50% and 63.2% with intercostal nerve transfers, 65% and 75% with accessory nerve transfers, and 90.4% and 86.9% with nerve transfers of collateral branches, respectively. Despite the obviously better outcomes with the latter technique, a significant difference was found only in comparison with intercostal nerve transfers for the musculocutaneous nerve (P = 0.007). With respect to the quality of recovery, we found a significant difference between the latter type and the other two types of nerve transfers only for the musculocutaneous nerve (P = 0.027 for intercostal nerve transfers and P = 0.05 for accessory nerve transfers). There was no significant difference in results obtained using the thoracodorsal and medial pectoral nerves as donors. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that nerve transfer of collateral branches when possible, such as in cases involving upper brachial plexus palsy, may be the method of choice, yielding better results.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed2000

Nerve transfer to the median nerve using parts of the ulnar and radial nerves in the rabbit--effects on motor recovery of the median nerve and donor nerve morbidity.

In this study, motor re-innervation of the median nerve by transfer of one-third, one-half, and two-thirds of either the agonistic ulnar nerve or the antagonistic radial nerve was investigated in both extremities of 20 rabbits. Recipient median nerve: Muscle contraction force of the flexor digitorum sublimus muscle after a one-third and a one-half of the ulnar nerve transfer achieved an average of 75 and 97% muscle power respectively as compared to conventional end-to-end neurorrhaphy. Muscle contraction force after one-third or one-half of the radial nerve transfer was significantly lower (36%). Donor nerves: Extensor carpi radialis muscle or flexor carpi ulnaris muscle contraction force 6 months postoperatively demonstrated a significant decrease after a one-half ulnar nerve and a two-thirds ulnar or radial nerve transfer, but not after a one-third transfer of either radial or ulnar nerves. Histologically, the number of axons in the re-innervated median nerve and both donor nerves distal to the coaptation site seemed to follow variable patterns. It was concluded that in the rabbit use of one-third of the agonistic ulnar nerve for re-innervation of the median nerve results in useful motor recovery with negligible donor site morbidity. Clinically, this technique may offer an alternative option for proximal nerve injuries or for free functioning muscle transplantations.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Nerve transfer to deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps, part II: a report of 7 cases.

PURPOSE: This study reports the results of nerve transfer to the deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps. METHODS: Seven patients with an average age of 25 years with loss of shoulder abduction secondary to upper brachial plexus injuries had nerve transfer using the nerve to the long head of the triceps to the anterior branch(es) of the axillary nerve through the posterior approach. The spinal accessory nerve was used simultaneously for nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve. The follow-up period ranged from 18 to 28 months (average, 20 mo). RESULTS: All patients recovered deltoid power against resistance (M4) at the last follow-up evaluation. Useful functional recovery was achieved in all 7 patients; 5 had excellent recoveries and 2 had good results. The average shoulder abduction was 124 degrees. No notable weakness of elbow extension was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This method is a reliable and effective procedure for deltoid reconstruction in brachial plexus injury (upper-arm type) and should be combined with spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve to obtain good shoulder abduction.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Restoration of motor function of the deep fibular (peroneal) nerve by direct nerve transfer of branches from the tibial nerve: an anatomical study.

Traction injuries of the common fibular (peroneal) nerve frequently result in significant morbidity due to tibialis anterior muscle paralysis and the associated loss of ankle dorsiflexion. Because current treatment options are often unsuccessful or unsatisfactory, other treatment approaches need to be explored. In this investigation, the anatomical feasibility of an alternative option, consisting of nerve transfer of motor branches from the tibial nerve to the deep fibular nerve, was studied. In ten cadaveric limbs, the branching pattern, length, and diameter of motor branches of the tibial nerve in the proximal leg were characterized; nerve transfer of each of these motor branches was then simulated to the proximal deep fibular nerve. A consistent, reproducible pattern of tibial nerve innervation was seen with minor variability. Branches to the flexor hallucis longus and flexor digitorum longus muscles were determined to be adequate, based on their branch point, branch pattern, and length, for direct nerve transfer in all specimens. Other branches, including those to the tibialis posterior, popliteus, gastrocnemius, and soleus muscles were not consistently adequate for direct nerve transfer for injuries extending to the bifurcation of the common fibular nerve or distal to it. For neuromas of the common fibular nerve that do not extend as far distally, branches to the soleus and lateral head of the gastrocnemius may be adequate for direct transfer if the intramuscular portions of these nerves are dissected. This study confirms the anatomical feasibility of direct nerve transfer using nerves to toe-flexor muscles as a treatment option to restore ankle dorsiflexion in cases of common fibular nerve injury.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Nerve transfers. New options for reconstruction following nerve injury.

Surgical reconstruction of proximal level nerve repair or long nerve grafts have provided less than optimal results, presenting the opportunity for investigation of alternate reconstructive techniques. Good motor function following an injury to a motor nerve requires a maximal number of motor axons reaching the motor end plate within a critical time period. Nerve transfers eliminate the need for a nerve graft by allowing a direct end to end nerve repair without tension. This article reviews surgical options using nerve transfers for patients with upper and lower extremity nerve injuries.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Reconstruction of high ulnar nerve lesions by distal double median to ulnar nerve transfer.

Ulnar nerve lesions around the elbow often carry an unfavorable prognosis due to insufficient sensory and intrinsic muscle recovery. We present a series of 7 cases in which restoration of ulnar innervated intrinsic muscles of the hand and of skin sensibility was achieved. This was accomplished by a distal connection of the anterior interosseous nerve and the superficial sensory palmar branch of the median nerve to the motor and sensory components of the ulnar nerve at Guyon's canal. The length of the follow-up period ranged from 1 to 3.5 years. Results were graded by the Highet-Zachary scale. Good motor and sensory recovery was obtained in 6 cases; only return of protective sensation occurred in the remaining case.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Distal anterior interosseous nerve transfer to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve for reconstruction of high ulnar nerve injuries.

Proximal ulnar nerve injuries can result in loss of intrinsic muscle function of the hand, and distal nerve transfers provide nerve coaptation close to the target muscle. This retrospective chart review evaluated patient outcome following a distal nerve transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve. There were eight patient charts reviewed, three women, and five men. The mean patient age was 38 years (standard deviation: 22 years). The mean time from injury to surgery was 3 months (standard deviation: 3 months), and mean postoperative follow-up time was 18 months (standard deviation: 11 months). All patients had reinnervation of the ulnar nerve intrinsic hand muscles with improved postoperative lateral pinch and grip strength. One patient had a secondary tendon transfer. No functional deficit in performing tasks in pronation was reported. The distal nerve transfer of the AIN to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve provides good reinnervation of the ulnar-nerve-innervated intrinsic muscles of the hand.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Nerve transfer for treatment of brachial plexus injury: comparison study between the transfer of partial median and ulnar nerves and that of phrenic and spinal accessary nerves.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of using partial median and ulnar nerves for treatment of C(5-6) or C(5-7) avulsion of the brachial plexus with that of using phrenic and spinal accessary nerves. METHODS: The patients were divided into 2 groups randomly according to different surgical procedures. Twelve cases were involved in the first group. The phrenic nerve was transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve or through a sural nerve graft, and the spinal accessary nerve was to the suprascapular nerve. Eleven cases were classified into the second group. A part of the fascicles of median nerve was transferred to be coapted with the motor fascicle of musculocutaneous nerve and a part of fascicles of ulnar nerve was transferred to the axillary nerve. The cases were followed up from 1 to 3 years and the clinical outcome was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 2 cases (16.6%) who got the recovery of M4 strength of biceps muscle in the first group but 7 cases (63.6%) in the second group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.025). However, it was not statistically different in the recovery of shoulder function between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Partial median and ulnar nerve transfer, phrenic and spinal accessary nerve transfer were all effective for the reconstruction of elbow or shoulder function in brachial plexus injury, but the neurotization using a part of median nerve could obtain more powerful biceps muscle strength than that of phrenic nerve transfer procedure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Restoration of elbow flexion by performing contralateral lateral thoracic and thoracodorsal nerve transfers after experimental musculocutaneous nerve transection.

OBJECT: The immediate transfer of the right lateral thoracic nerve (LTN) and the thoracodorsal nerve (TDN) to the transected left musculocutaneous nerve (MCN), leading to nerve cross-neurotization, was performed in cats to evaluate reinnervation of the biceps brachii muscle (BBM). METHODS: Surgery to produce cross-neurotization of the MCN was performed in 12 cats (treatment group). Transection of the MCN was performed without attempts at neurotization in three cats (control group). Reinnervation of the BBM was assessed by performing electromyography (EMG) 6 months (14 cats) and 26 months (one cat) postsurgery. True Blue retrograde axonal tracing studies, tensile force measurements (muscle extensometry), and histopathological analyses were performed. All cats in the treatment group recovered voluntary contraction of the BBM and regained elbow flexion. Electromyography revealed no abnormal spontaneous activity in the BBM. Muscle evoked potentials were recorded in that muscle after right C-8 ventral branch stimulation. The muscle contraction strength in the left BBM varied from 108 to 557 g. The BBMs regained their normal appearances. The region of the MCN distal to the anastomosis displayed a normal histological appearance. Fluorescence was detected in the ventral horn of the spinal cord in the right C-8 and T-1 segments. In contrast, in all cats in the control group there was atrophy of the BBM, no EMG signal, and no clinical sign of recovery. There was no contraction of the BBM, no labeled neuron in the spinal cord, and the MCN displayed major degenerative changes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that the LTN and TDN can be used to neurotize injured contralateral brachial plexus nerves and obtain successful reinnervation in cats.

Animals↗