Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Nelfinavir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

A generalized seizure following initiation of nelfinavir in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, suspected due to interaction between nelfinavir and phenytoin.

Nelfinavir, one of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) specific protease inhibitors(PIs), is widely used for the treatment of HIV infection. Nelfinavir, which is metabolized with the cytochrome p450 isoforms, elevate the phenytoin level theoretically because nelfinavir acts as an inhibitor of phenytoin metabolism through the enzyme. However, we encountered a case of seizure recurrence caused by a lowered phenytoin level after initiation of nelfinavir. We should be aware of the change in the phenytoin level in concomitant use of nelfinavir.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Correlation between human immunodeficiency virus genotypic resistance and virologic response in patients receiving nelfinavir monotherapy or nelfinavir with lamivudine and zidovudine.

The relationship between detectable human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) genotypic resistance and virologic response was compared in patients receiving nelfinavir as monotherapy (16 weeks) or in combination with lamuvidine and zidovudine (48 weeks). Two patient groups were defined on the basis of the presence or absence of substitutions associated with nelfinavir, a protease (PR) inhibitor, and/or a reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor. HIV RNA levels <50 copies/mL were achieved in 17 (85%) of 20 combination-therapy patients without genotypic resistance (PR-RT(-)) versus only 1 (17%) of 6 patients with genotypic resistance (PR-RT(+)). PR-RT(-) patients exhibited greater and more durable virus suppression compared with PR-RT(+) patients. All 6 PR-RT(+) patients had virus with M184V (lamuvidine resistance); 3 isolates also contained D30N (nelfinavir resistance). M184V preceded D30N in all determinable instances. In this study, suppression of HIV replication to <50 copies/mL was associated with durable response and reduced incidence of resistance. Results also indicate that combination regimens can fail despite the absence of detectable genotypic PR resistance.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1998

Nelfinavir. A review of its therapeutic efficacy in HIV infection.

UNLABELLED: Nelfinavir is a selective inhibitor of HIV protease, the enzyme responsible for post-translational processing of HIV propeptides. In the presence of the drug, immature, noninfectious virus particles are produced. Nelfinavir in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors profoundly suppresses viral replication. Plasma HIV RNA levels (viral loan) rapidly fall below the limit of detection (LOD; usually 400 or 500 copies/ml in the majority of patients. When used in combination with NRTIs, nelfinavir 1250mg twice daily produced similar results to 3-times-daily nelfinavir at a range of total daily dosages. In an ongoing study > 70% of adults receiving a nelfinavir based combination regimen had plasma HIV RNA levels below the LOD (< 400 copies/ml) after 84 weeks. In addition, 73% of paediatric patients receiving nelfinavir plus at least 1 new NRTI had viral loads below the LOD (< 400 copies/ml) after 34 weeks. Furthermore, CD4+ cell counts generally increased in conjunction with reductions in viral load. Combination therapy with nelfinavir and saquinavir results in higher saquinavir plasma concentrations, make twice-daily administration of saquinavir feasible and may delay the emergence of resistant viral strains. A unique mutation at codon 30 (D30N) of the protease gene confers resistance to nelfinavir, but HIV with D30N mutation remains fully susceptible to indinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir in vitro. Nonetheless, in clinical use, significant cross-resistance is seen with all currently available protease inhibitors. Diarrhoea is the most frequently reported adverse event in patients receiving nelfinavir-based combination therapy and has been reported in up to 32% of nelfinavir recipients in randomised trials. Diarrhoea is generally of mild to moderate severity and does not result in weight loss. Rash, nausea, headache and asthenia were each reported in < or = 5% of patients. Approximately 5% of patients enrolled in an expanded access programme in the US discontinued nelfinavir because of adverse events. Nelfinavir is metabolised by the cytochrome P450 system. Several clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions between nelfinavir and other drugs (i.e. ketoconazole, rifabutin, rifabutin, rifampicin), including other protease inhibitors (i.e. indinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir) have been documented. As with other available protease inhibitors, hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidaemia and abnormal fat distribution have been reported, albeit infrequently, in association with nelfinavir. CONCLUSION: Nelfinavir-based combination regimens are well tolerated and produce profound and prolonged suppression of HIV replication in adult and paediatric patients. Hence, nelfinavir is suitable for inclusion in antiretroviral regimens for initial therapy for HIV infection and, alternatively, in regimens for patients unable to tolerate other protease inhibitors.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Characterization of the selectivity and mechanism of human cytochrome P450 inhibition by the human immunodeficiency virus-protease inhibitor nelfinavir mesylate.

In vitro studies with human liver microsomes and P450 probe substrates were performed to characterize selectivity and mechanism of cytochrome P450 inhibition by nelfinavir mesylate. At therapeutic concentrations (steady-state plasma concentrations approximately 4 microM), nelfinavir was found to be a competitive inhibitor of only testosterone 6beta-hydroxylase (CYP3A4) with a Ki concentration of 4. 8 microM. At supratherapeutic concentrations, nelfinavir competitively inhibited dextromethorphan O-demethylase (CYP2D6), S-mephenytoin 4-hydroxylase (CYP2C19), and phenacetin O-deethylase (CYP1A2) with Ki concentrations of 68, 126, and 190 microM, respectively. Nelfinavir did not appreciably inhibit tolbutamide 4-hydroxylase (CYP2C9), paclitaxel 6alpha-hydroxylase (CYP2C8), or chlorzoxaxone 6beta-hydroxylase (CYP2E1) activities. The inhibitory potency of nelfinavir toward CYP3A4 suggested the possibility of in vivo inhibition of this isoform, whereas in vivo inhibition of other P450s was considered unlikely. In a one-sequence crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers, nelfinavir inhibited the elimination of the CYP3A substrate terfenadine and the carboxylate metabolite of terfenadine. The 24-hr urinary recoveries of 6beta-hydroxycortisol were reduced by an average of 27% during nelfinavir treatment, consistent with CYP3A inhibition by nelfinavir. Inhibition of CYP3A4 by nelfinavir in vitro was NADPH-dependent requiring the catalytic formation of a metabolite or a metabolic intermediate. The catechol metabolite of nelfinavir (M3) was considered unlikely to be responsible for inhibition as the addition of catechol O-methyl transferase, S-adenosyl methionine, and ascorbic acid to the preincubation mixture did not protect against the loss of testosterone 6beta-hydroxylase activity. Also, the addition of M3 to human liver microsomes did not inhibit CYP3A4. Although incubations with nelfinavir showed a time- and concentration-dependent loss of CYP3A4 activity, the partial or complete recovery of enzyme activity upon dialysis indicated that inhibition was reversible. Microsomal incubations with nelfinavir and NADPH did not result in a loss of spectral P450 content compared with the NADPH control. Glutathione, N-acetylcysteine, and catalase did not attenuate CYP3A4 inhibition by nelfinavir. Collectively, these results suggest that the probable mechanism for CYP3A4 inhibition by nelfinavir is a transient metabolic intermediate or stable metabolite that coordinates tightly but reversibly to the heme moiety of the P450.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Clinical pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir combined with efavirenz and stavudine during rescue treatment of heavily pretreated HIV-infected patients.

Nelfinavir is a novel protease inhibitor that exhibits good inhibitory activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and is currently used in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors for the management of HIV infection. In this study we analysed the pharmacokinetic profile of nelfinavir after multiple oral doses in 18 HIV-infected patients during a combination regimen of nelfinavir plus efavirenz and stavudine. Patients who received the study drug for >/=4 weeks were considered for pharmacokinetic evaluation. Blood samples were obtained at the following times: 0 (before nelfinavir administration), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 h after administration. Nelfinavir plasma concentrations were analysed by a specific and validated HPLC assay with ultraviolet detection. Nelfinavir concentration-time data were analysed by compartmental and non-compartmental techniques and the pharmacokinetic parameters of nelfinavir were determined according to a one-compartment model. We found a high variability between individuals in nelfinavir plasma concentrations. The mean average drug plasma concentration was 2.22 +/- 1.25 mg/L and the mean AUC during the dosing interval was 17.7 +/- 10.0 mg*h/L. The mean nelfinavir trough plasma concentration was 1.58 +/- 1.0 mg/L. A good relationship was found between AUC(0-8h) and the plasma concentrations measured at 6 h, and the trough plasma concentrations made total body exposure for nelfinavir less predictable. Alternatively, a 2 h abbreviated AUC provides a good estimate of the full AUC(0-8h). Comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained in our patients with those reported for patients receiving nelfinavir monotherapy or nelfinavir combined with nucleoside analogues, one observes substantial overlap with nelfinavir concentrations achieved without efavirenz.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Nelfinavir: an update on its use in HIV infection.

UNLABELLED: Nelfinavir is one of several currently available protease inhibitors used to limit viral replication and improve immune function in HIV-infected individuals. It is administered in combination with other antiretroviral agents. Nelfinavir has been evaluated as first-line therapy with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in treatment-naive patients, or as an additional antiretroviral agent in protease inhibitor-naive patients already receiving NRTIs. These studies have shown good efficacy in terms of HIV viral load reduction and increased CD4+ cell counts. When used in combination with NRTIs, nelfinavir 1250 mg twice daily produced similar results to 750 mg 3 times daily. The more convenient twice-daily dosage schedule, which is now approved in the US, may be beneficial in improving patient adherence to therapy. Nelfinavir has also been used successfully in combination with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors, with or without NRTIs. Resistance to nelfinavir has been observed in vitro and in clinical isolates from patients experiencing insufficient or waning viral suppression during treatment. Nelfinavir primarily selects for the D30N mutation, which is not seen with other protease inhibitors, and alone does not cause resistance to other protease inhibitors in vitro. Several studies have shown that patients who experience virological failure while receiving nelfinavir can respond to salvage therapy with other protease inhibitors. Diarrhoea is the most frequent adverse event in patients receiving nelfinavir-based combination therapy, but was generally mild and resulted in minimal discontinuation of therapy in clinical trials. Diarrhoea can usually be controlled with drugs that slow gastrointestinal motility. Metabolic disturbances associated with protease inhibitor use (hypercholesterolaemia, hyperglycaemia and lipodystrophy) have also been reported with nelfinavir. Nelfinavir is associated with a number of clinically significant drug interactions and coadministration of some drugs (e.g. astemizole, cisapride, triazolam) is contraindicated. Coadministration of nelfinavir with other protease inhibitors generally resulted in favourable pharmacokinetic interactions (usually increased area under the concentration-time curve for both drugs). CONCLUSION: Nelfinavir, in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors, is effective in limiting HIV replication and increasing CD4+ cell counts in HIV-infected adults and children. The convenience of its dosage administration, the low incidence of adverse events, and the potential for salvage therapies indicate that nelfinavir (as part of combined antiretroviral therapy regimens) should be considered as a first-line option in protease inhibitor-naive patients and in those unable to tolerate other protease inhibitors.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Failure to detect nelfinavir in the cerebrospinal fluid of HIV-1--infected patients with and without AIDS dementia complex.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the penetration of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor, nelfinavir, into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). DESIGN: Nelfinavir, a commonly used HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI), is highly effective for reducing plasma viral load. It is deployed clinically in combination with other antiretroviral agents, including nucleoside and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs and NNRTIs). Despite its potency based on plasma HIV-1 RNA results, its effectiveness in reducing HIV-1 RNA levels (i.e., viral load) in the central nervous system (CNS) is less certain. We sampled the CSF as a surrogate for brain because this fluid also is separated from the blood by a barrier to free diffusion, the blood-CSF barrier (BCB), which shares properties with the blood-brain barrier (BBB). These studies of nelfinavir CSF pharmacokinetics exploited the multiple CSF samples derived from individual study subjects who were enrolled in studies the primary objective of which was to compare viral kinetics in CSF and blood in response to antiviral therapy. METHODS: Six study subjects, four with and two without AIDS dementia complex, underwent multiple lumbar punctures (LP). Intervals of CSF sampling after drug dosing were varied (from 0.48 hours to 10.3 hours after nelfinavir administration) to quantitate nelfinavir concentrations throughout the steady-state dosing interval. In four study subjects, CSF sampling was accompanied by assessment of nelfinavir levels in plasma before and after LP, whereas in the other two subjects, a single plasma sample was obtained before or after the LP. In total, 25 CSF samples were analyzed. Nelfinavir concentrations in CSF and plasma were determined using an high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with a limit of quantitation of 25 and 50 ng/ml, respectively. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations before and after LP averaged 2420+/-1365 ng/ml and 2528+/-1132 ng/ml, respectively. Nelfinavir was not detected in any of the CSF samples and levels >25 ng/ml were not present in the CSF. Thus, standard therapy with nelfinavir does not result in CSF drug concentrations at or exceeding the IC95 level for most HIV-1 isolates. However, study subjects with high CSF viral loads experienced a marked reduction in the context of the combination-drug regimen including nelfinavir with two subjects showing a comparable CSF response with that in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Nelfinavir does not appreciably penetrate into the CSF. The clinical importance of this observation is not certain, in that in four study subjects who initiated nelfinavir in combination with other antiretroviral therapy, a comparable degree of viral suppression was obtained in both the CSF and the blood when sampled 4 weeks or later after initiating therapy.

AIDS Dementia Complex↗
PubMed1999

Nelfinavir mesylate: a protease inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, and dosage guidelines of nelfinavir mesylate. DATA SOURCE: A MEDLINE search restricted to English-language literature from January 1966 to February 1998 and an extensive review of journals was conducted to prepare this article. MeSH headings included protease inhibitors, nelfinavir mesylate, and AG1343. Abstracts presented at meetings and data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were also reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: The data on efficacy, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, and drug interactions were obtained from in vitro studies, as well as open-label and controlled trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nelfinavir inhibits HIV protease enzyme resulting in formation of immature and noninfectious virions. In combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nelfinavir is effective in reducing the viral load below the quantifiable limit (< 500 copies/mL) and increasing the mean CD4+ cell count. This antiviral effect is sustained at least over 21 months. The bioavailability of nelfinavir ranges from 20% to 80%, and it increases when nelfinavir is administered with food. Following multiple dosing of nelfinavir 750 mg three times daily, maximum concentration at steady-state was 3-4 micrograms/mL and minimum concentration was 1-3 micrograms/mL. The elimination half-life for nelfinavir ranges from three to five hours. Nelfinavir is primarily metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes and excreted in the feces. Current dosing recommendations are 750 mg three times daily for adults and adolescents and 20-30 mg/kg/dose three times daily for children aged 2-13 years. Studies of twice-daily regimens in adults are being conducted and are promising. Use of nelfinavir as salvage therapy is also being studied. Some of the commonly reported adverse events of nelfinavir are diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited published data, the FDA has approved nelfinavir in combination therapy for the treatment of HIV infection. The choice of antiretroviral (ARV) regimens should be made based on the risk of disease progression as indicated by HIV RNA concentrations and CD4+ cell counts, patients' previous ARV experiences and responses, concomitant drug therapy, compliance history, underlying disease states, and adverse reaction history.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

The safety profile and antiviral activity of the combination of stavudine, didanosine, and nelfinavir in patients with HIV infection.

We assessed the safety profile, tolerability, and antiviral effect of 12 weeks of triple combination therapy with stavudine (d4T), didanosine (ddI), and nelfinavir in patients who had not previously received therapy with d4T, ddI, or a protease inhibitor. We also assessed the effect of the buffered tablet formulation of ddI on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir. The study had a single-arm, open-label design and enrolled patients aged > or =18 years who had HIV infection and > or =10,000 plasma HIV RNA copies/mL. Patients received the full recommended doses of oral d4T, ddI, and nelfinavir. Efficacy was assessed in terms of change from baseline in plasma HIV RNA and CD4+ cell counts, as well as in terms of the proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA levels <400 copies/mL. The first 10 patients enrolled in the study were included in a substudy to determine the effects of the buffered tablet formulation of ddI on the pharmacokinetic profile of nelfinavir. A dose of ddI was given 1 hour before nelfinavir, after which the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of nelfinavir were determined. A total of 22 patients entered the trial, of whom 1 (5%) had AIDS, 12 (55%) had symptomatic HIV infection, and 9 (41%) were asymptomatic. The median baseline CD4+ cell count was 315 cells/microL (range, 70-709 cells/microL), and the median plasma viral load was 4.8 log10 copies/mL (range, 4.0-5.6 log10 copies/mL). ddI had no clinically significant effects on the plasma pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir. At the end of 12 weeks of treatment, the mean (+/- SE) decrease in plasma viral load was 1.36+/-0.24 log10 copies/mL, and 8 of 16 patients (50%) achieved plasma HIV RNA levels <400 copies/mL; the mean (+/- SE) increase in CD4+ cell count was 111.4+/-31.7 cells/microL. Patients who were judged to be compliant with antiretroviral therapy (ie, who missed <7 days of all 3 study drugs during 12 weeks of treatment) experienced mean decreases in viral load exceeding 2.0 log10 copies/mL, and 6 of 7 patients achieved HIV RNA levels <400 copies/mL after 12 weeks of therapy. Although 95% of patients reported an adverse event of grade 1 or higher, only 1 patient experienced a grade 3 or 4 adverse event (maculopapular rash) related to nelfinavir. As reflected in the Cmax, Tmax, and AUC, administration of ddI 1 hour before nelfinavir did not influence the pharmacokinetic profile of the protease inhibitor. Triple drug therapy with d4T, ddI, and nelfinavir was well tolerated and associated with few clinically significant toxicities. This treatment resulted in substantial reductions in viral load and improvements in CD4+ cell count over 12 weeks.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

A study of the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin and nelfinavir when coadministered in healthy volunteers.

A two-way, open-label, crossover study in 12 subjects was undertaken to study the potential for azithromycin to alter the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and/or its active metabolite, M8. A secondary objective was to characterize any potential interaction that nelfinavir may have with azithromycin. During one dosing arm, subjects received a single 1200 mg oral dose of azithromycin. During the other, subjects received 11 days of nelfinavir 750 mg q8h with a single 1200 mg oral dose of azithromycin given concurrently with the Day 9 morning nelfinavir dose. Serum samples were collected after each azithromycin dose for 168 hours and after the Day 8 and 9 morning nelfinavir doses for 8 hours to characterize azithromycin, nelfinavir, and M8 pharmacokinetic parameters during both control and test periods. Both dosing regimens were well tolerated, with only mild to moderate GI side effects being the most frequently reported. Azithromycin was found to cause a statistically, though not clinically, significant decrease in nelfinavir and M8 exposures. In contrast, nelfinavir caused azithromycin Cmax and exposure (AUC) values to increase by > 100%. Inhibition of p-glycoprotein by nelfinavir may be responsible for this significant interaction. This increase in azithromycin exposure has the potential to increase clinical antibacterial efficacy without significantly increasing gastrointestinal side effects, though the impact on other systemic sites needs to be studied.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A randomized, comparative study of lamivudine plus stavudine, with indinavir or nelfinavir, in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare adherence and clinical outcome with two modalities of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care centre in Spain. PATIENTS: A total of 112 non-naive HIV-infected patients, recruited from March 1998 through August 1998, were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Triple drug therapy with stavudine and lamivudine, plus indinavir or nelfinavir. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adherence, side-effects, and immunological, virological, and clinical efficacy of treatment were assessed at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 9 months, 32% of patients in the indinavir group versus 50% of those in the nelfinavir group showed adequate adherence in all clinical appointments (P= 0.0559). Adherence was superior in the nelfinavir group in every visit. After 6 months of treatment 48% of subjects in the indinavir group and 70% of those in the nelfinavir group exhibited adequate adherence (P= 0.0311). After 9 months 35% of patients in the indinavir group and 59% of those in the nelfinavir group showed adequate adherence (P= 0.0291). Side-effects provoked discontinuation of treatment in 34% of patients in the indinavir group and 12% of patients in the nelfinavir group (P= 0.0073). Immunological and virological efficacy were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to a HAART regimen with stavudine plus lamivudine plus nelfinavir was superior to a regimen with stavudine plus lamivudine plus indinavir. Side-effects provoked more discontinuation of treatment in the indinavir group than in the nelfinavir group.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Virological efficacy and plasma drug concentrations of nelfinavir plus saquinavir as salvage therapy in HIV-infected patients refractory to standard triple therapy.

Therapeutic options are limited for patients refractory to triple therapy with two reverse transcriptase inhibitors and one protease inhibitor. Preliminary results showing favorable effects of protease inhibitor combination therapy with nelfinavir and saquinavir due to inhibition of metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP450) prompted us to study this combination. - Thirteen patients with incomplete suppression of plasma HIV-RNA were enrolled and treatment was started with nelfinavir 750 mg tid and saquinavir 400 mg bid. Saquinavir-dosage was escalated in weekly intervals to 400 mg tid and 600 mg tid, respectively. All doses were given with food, and plasma levels of saquinavir and nelfinavir were assessed 4 hours post-dosing after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 weeks. Treatment was considered virologically efficacious if HIV-viral load was reduced by at least 0.5 log10 from baseline. - Double protease inhibitor-treatment with nelfinavir and saquinavir was virologically efficacious in 5/13 (39%) patients after 4 weeks but only in 4/13 (31%) patients after 8 and 1/13 (8%) after 16 and 24 weeks, respectively. No statistical difference in plasma concentrations was observed when saquinavir was administered in increasing doses of 400 mg bid, 400 mg tid or 600 mg tid in combination with nelfinavir. 5/13 (39%) patients developed diarrhea (>4/d), no other serious side-effects were observed. By eight weeks, the mean CD4 count for all patients was significantly higher when compared to baseline. - In patients refractory to standard triple therapy the combination of nelfinavir and saquinavir showed significant elevation of CD4-count, but only short term virological efficacy in a minority of patients. Plasma concentrations of saquinavir could not be increased by weekly dose escalation of the drug from 400 mg bid to 600 mg tid. Saquinavir drug concentrations of 600 mg saquinavir tid and nelfinavir showed rather non-significant lower values when compared to historical controls treated with a double-dose 1200 mg saquinavir tid regimen alone. We conclude that in these patients the combination of nelfinavir plus saquinavir has no advantage in terms of increasing bioavailibility of saquinavir or virological efficacy. During short observation time a beneficial effect on CD4-count was observed.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiretroviral activity of the potent, specific human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor nelfinavir: results of a phase I/II trial and extended follow-up in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus.

The safety, antiretroviral activity, and pharmacokinetic profile of nelfinavir, a potent and specific inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease, were assessed in a small open-label phase I/II dose-ranging study in protease inhibitor-naive HIV-positive men. A total of 22 patients with baseline plasma HIV RNA > or = 20,000 copies/mL and CD4+ counts between 200 and 500 cells/mm3 were enrolled in the study. Of the 22 patients, 20 were evaluated for activity; 10 patients assigned to 771 mg/day base equivalent (300 mg three times daily) and 10 patients assigned to 1,026 mg/day base equivalent (600 mg twice daily) given monotherapy. A capsule formulation of nelfinavir was used. The initial study period was 28 days; patients showing a virologic response of 1 log10 reduction were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase and addition of nucleoside analogues. A maximally tolerated dose of nelfinavir was not established. A dose-response relationship was observed for four (40%) patients in the 771-mg group and six (60%) patients in the 1,026-mg group experiencing a reduction from baseline in plasma HIV RNA of at lest 1 log during the 28-day study. Of these patients, five sustained the reduction in plasma HIV RNA beyond day 28 (2 patients receiving 771 mg/day and 3 patients receiving 1,026 mg/day). Median increases from baseline in CD4+ counts at day 28 were 216 cell/mm3 and 86 cell/mm3 in the 771-mg and 1,026-mg groups, respectively. After oral administration, median nelfinavir plasma concentrations on day 28 reached a maximum at 1 hour (2,966 ng/mL) in the 771-mg group and at 3 hours (3,157 ng/mL) in the 1,026-mg group. Data for 22 patients were included in the safety analysis; 12 patients (55%) reported at least one grade 2 or worse (moderate, severe, or very severe) adverse event. The most common grade 2 or worse adverse event was diarrhea, reported by two patients (20%) receiving 771 mg/day and seven patients (70%) receiving 1,026 mg/day; followed by nausea, flatulence, asthenia, and headache (each reported in 1 patient [10%] in the 771-mg group) and dizziness (reported in 1 patient [10%] receiving 1,026 mg/day). In the small subgroup (n = 6) who continued taking nelfinavir for longer periods (between 8 and 15 months), virologic responses were sustained in the majority of patients with good tolerability. Nelfinavir is an active HIV-protease inhibitor with favorable pharmacokinetics, good tolerability, and sustained antiviral effects. Results of this early phase I/II dose-ranging study provided data for the safety and antiretroviral activity of nelfinavir and led to the selection of higher doses for phase II/III trials to further optimize virologic and immunologic responses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Combination nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor(s) plus nevirapine, nelfinavir, or ritonavir in stable antiretroviral therapy-experienced HIV-infected children: week 24 results of a randomized controlled trial--PACTG 377. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 377 Study Team.

One hundred eighty-one antiretroviral-experienced, protease inhibitor-naive, clinically stable HIV-infected children between 4 months and 17 years of age were randomly assigned to receive one of four combination regimens to evaluate the change in plasma HIV RNA, safety, and tolerance when changing antiretroviral therapy to a protease inhibitor-containing combination regimen. All four regimens contained stavudine; in addition children received nevirapine plus ritonavir, lamivudine plus nelfinavir, nevirapine plus nelfinavir, or lamivudine plus nevirapine plus nelfinavir. Twelve additional children chose to receive stavudine plus lamivudine plus nelfinavir, with nelfinavir given bid, rather than tid as for the main regimens. Overall, 51% (89/176; 95% CI 43-58%) of the children on the randomized portion of the study had an HIV RNA response (< or =400 copies/ml) on at least two of the three HIV RNA determinations taken at Weeks 8, 12, and 16. At Week 24 the proportion of children with an HIV RNA response still on initial therapy was 47% (83/176; 95% CI 40-55%) and ranged from 41 to 61% for the four randomized treatment arms. Rash was frequently seen (27%) on the treatment arms containing nevirapine. At Week 24 64% (7/11, 95% CI 31-89%) of the children on the bid nelfinavir combination regimen were still on initial therapy with an HIV RNA response as compared with 46% (23/50; 95% CI 32-61%) on the corresponding tid nelfinavir combination regimen. A change in antiretroviral therapy to a protease inhibitor-containing regimen was associated with a virological response rate of approximately 50% for this patient population.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1997

Activities of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitor nelfinavir mesylate in combination with reverse transcriptase and protease inhibitors against acute HIV-1 infection in vitro.

Nelfinavir mesylate (formerly AG1343) is a potent and selective, nonpeptidic inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease that was discovered by protein structure-based design methodologies. We evaluated the antiviral and cytotoxic effects of two-drug combinations of nelfinavir with the clinically approved antiretroviral therapeutics zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), dideoxycytidine (ddC; zalcitabine), stavudine (d4T), didanosine (ddI), indinavir, saquinavir, and ritonavir and a three-drug combination of nelfinavir with ZDV and 3TC against an acute HIV-1 strain RF infection of CEM-SS cells in vitro. Quantitative assessment of drug interaction was evaluated by a universal response surface approach (W. R. Greco, G. Bravo, and J. C. Parsons, Pharm. Rev. 47:331-385, 1995) and by the method of M. N. Prichard and C. Shipman (Antiviral Res. 14:181-206, 1990). Both analytical methods yielded similar results and showed that the two-drug combinations of nelfinavir with the reverse transcriptase inhibitors ZDV, 3TC, ddI, d4T, and ddC and the three-drug combination with ZDV and 3TC resulted in additive to statistically significant synergistic interactions. In a similar manner, the combination of nelfinavir with the three protease inhibitors resulted in additive (ritonavir and saquinavir) to slightly antagonistic (indinavir) interactions. In all combinations, minimal cellular cytotoxicity was observed with any drug alone and in combination. These results suggest that administration of combinations of the appropriate doses of nelfinavir with other currently approved antiretroviral therapeutic agents in vivo may result in enhanced antiviral activity with no associated increase in cellular cytotoxicity.

Cell Survival↗
PubMed1997

Nelfinavir.

Nelfinavir is a protease inhibitor which shows good inhibitory activity against HIV-1. The pattern of HIV-1 resistance to nelfinavir is different from that seen with other protease inhibitors. In healthy male volunteers, administration of single 400 and 800mg doses of nelfinavir with food resulted in area under the plasma concentration-time curve values that were 27 to 50% higher than those achieved in fasted volunteers who received the same doses of the drug. Reductions in plasma HIV RNA to below detectable levels (detection limit 500 copies/ml) were achieved in some patients (number not reported) after 28 days' treatment with nelfinavir 500, 600 or 750 mg twice daily, or 500, 750 or 1000 mg 3 times daily. Combination therapy with nelfinavir and stavudine produced greater reductions in plasma HIV RNA levels that stavudine monotherapy in patients who had not previously received stavudine treatment; mean increases in CD4+ cell counts were also greater in the combination treatment group than in monotherapy recipients. Plasma HIV RNA decreased to below detectable levels in 11 of 12 patients with early onset HIV infection who received a triple regimen of nelfinavir, zidovudine and lamivudine for 16 weeks.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2000

Simultaneous HPLC assay for quantification of indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir in human plasma.

BACKGROUND: HIV protease inhibitors are recommended as part of combination antiretroviral therapy. Dual protease inhibitor therapy is also being used clinically. Consequently, a simultaneous assay for indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir was developed. METHODS: Indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir were extracted from plasma (250 microL) with methyl-t-butyl ether at basic pH after addition of an internal standard (A-86093). The compounds were separated on a Keystone BetaBasic C4 column (250 x 3 mm i.d.) at 40 degrees C with a mobile phase of acetonitrile-50 mmol/L ammonium formate buffer, pH 4.1 (52:48, by volume) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and the internal standard (A-86093) were detected at 218 nm, and saquinavir was detected at 235 nm. The method was validated by analysis of five triplicate analyses of calibrators along with quality-control samples at three different concentrations prepared in human plasma. RESULTS: The extraction recovery was 87-92%. Within-run accuracy for quality-control samples was 6-8%, with CVs of 2-8%. Limits of quantification were 40-50 microg/L for indinavir, nelfinavir, and ritonavir, and 20 microg/L for saquinavir. Cross-validation with a liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy method for saquinavir and nelfinavir was conducted with patient samples. Regression analysis revealed a good correlation (r(2) >0.94) between methods. Larger variations at concentrations >4000 microg/L were observed with nelfinavir. Interference with drugs commonly used in AIDS patients was not observed. Pharmacokinetic profiles for two patients on dual protease therapy were determined. CONCLUSIONS: A reliable and rugged simultaneous HPLC assay for four HIV protease inhibitors was developed. The assay method is convenient for clinical laboratories involved in therapeutic drug monitoring for HIV protease inhibitors. The assay has enough sensitivity to conduct pharmacokinetic studies in patients taking more than one HIV protease inhibitor along with other antiretroviral medications.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed1997

High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of nelfinavir, a novel HIV-1 protease inhibitor, in human plasma.

Nelfinavir mesylate, a potent and orally bioavailable inhibitor of HIV-1 protease (Ki=2 nM), has undergone Phase III clinical evaluation in a large population of HIV-positive patients. A high-performance liquid chromatography analytical method was developed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of the free base, nelfinavir, in these human subjects. The method involved the extraction of nelfinavir and an internal standard, 6,7-dimethyl-2,3-di-(2-pyridyl)quinoxaline, from 250 microl of human plasma with a mixture of ethyl acetate-acetonitrile (90:10, v/v). The analysis was via ultraviolet detection at 220 nm using a reversed-phase C18 analytical column and a mobile phase consisting of 25 mM monobasic sodium phosphate buffer (adjusted to pH 3.4 with phosphoric acid)-acetonitrile (58:42, v/v) that resolved the drug and internal standard peaks from non-specific substances in human plasma. The method was validated under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) conditions for specificity, inter- and intra-assay precision and accuracy, absolute recovery and stability. The mean recovery ranged from 92.4 to 83.0% for nelfinavir and was 95.7% for the internal standard. The method was linear over a concentration range of 0.0300 microg/ml to 10 microg/ml, with a minimum quantifiable level of 0.0500 microg/ml for nelfinavir.

Anti-HIV Agents↗