Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Nafarelin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Nafarelin controlled release injectable: theoretical clinical plasma profiles from multiple dosing and from mixtures of microspheres containing 2 per cent, 4 per cent and 7 per cent nafarelin.

Nafarelin controlled release injectable (CRI) releases a decapeptide drug for target one month therapy. Nafarelin, a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonistic analogue, is microencapsulated in biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres and given by intramuscular injection. Clinical data from a human single dose Phase I clinical study are modelled to develop theoretical multiple dose profiles and theoretical single dose profiles from mixtures of two or three formulations. Single dose injections of nafarelin CRI microspheres (4 mg nafarelin) containing 2, 4, or 7 per cent nafarelin all achieve useful plasma drug levels throughout the target 30 day interval. Therapeutic suppression of testosterone levels was observed in all subjects participating in the phase I clinical study. Highest plasma nafarelin levels are achieved in the 0-10 and 20-35 day post-injection intervals. Theoretical multiple dosing profiles generated from the single dose clinical results show significant oscillations in plasma nafarelin levels depending on the particular dosing interval selected. Thirty or forty day dosing intervals yield significant variability in plasma nafarelin levels at steady state; 15 day dosing intervals show less variability. Therapeutic testosterone suppression was observed in the single dose study, so the nafarelin dose per injection can be reduced in multiple dosing therapies. Theoretical plasma nafarelin profiles from certain mixtures of 2 and 4 per cent nafarelin microspheres or 2 and 7 per cent nafarelin microspheres indicate that a 60 day product could be achieved. In general, all three formulations yield their lowest plasma drug levels during the 10-20 day post-injection interval. Therefore any mixture of these formulations will likewise exhibit low plasma drug levels during this interval.

Computer Simulation↗

Nafarelin vs. leuprolide acetate depot for endometriosis. Changes in bone mineral density and vasomotor symptoms. Nafarelin Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare intranasal nafarelin and intramuscular leuprolide acetate (LA) depot in the management of endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-placebo, double-blind study was conducted on subjects who had symptoms and signs of endometriosis and bone mineral density (BMD) within the age-appropriate normal range. For 6 months, 99 subjects received nafarelin, 200 micrograms twice daily, and placebo injections once monthly; 93 subjects received LA depot injections, 3.75 mg once monthly, and placebo nasal spray, twice daily. Subjects were followed throughout treatment and for six months after treatment. The main outcome measures were changes in endometriosis symptoms and signs, BMD measurements, subject-reported and objectively measured hot flushes and circulating estradiol concentrations. RESULTS: Nafarelin was as effective as LA depot in alleviating symptoms and signs of endometriosis. LA depot recipients lost significantly more BMD, had more days with subjective hot flushes and more objectively measured hot flushes than did nafarelin recipients. In the nafarelin group, estradiol levels were consistently higher than in the leuprolide depot group, with significant differences by month 3 of dosing. CONCLUSION: Nafarelin and LA depot were equally effective despite higher estradiol levels in nafarelin recipients. Nafarelin-treated subjects lost less BMD, had fewer days with hot flushes and had fewer objectively measured hot flushes.

Adult↗

Nafarelin for endometriosis: a large-scale, danazol-controlled trial of efficacy and safety, with 1-year follow-up. The Nafarelin European Endometriosis Trial Group (NEET).

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of nafarelin and danazol for endometriosis. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy. SETTING: Multiple European institutions. PATIENTS: In total, 307 patients with laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis received nafarelin (n = 206) or danazol (n = 101); 263 (171 nafarelin, 92 danazol) were analyzed for efficacy. INTERVENTIONS: Intranasal nafarelin 200 micrograms two times a day or oral danazol 200 mg three times a day were administered for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy assessments were based on preadmission and end-of-treatment laparoscopic scores and subjective symptom scores at admission, end of treatment, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Safety was evaluated by adverse events and clinical laboratory tests. RESULTS: In each group, endometriosis growth and symptoms significantly improved during treatment (P less than 0.001). After treatment, symptoms returned in each group, but severity was less than at admission at all time points (P less than or equal to 0.016). Mean body weight increased in the danazol-treated group (P less than 0.001), serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase increased in both groups (P less than 0.001 for both) but significantly more in danazol users (P less than 0.002), and more nafarelin recipients had hot flushes (P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nafarelin and danazol were equally effective in reducing endometriosis growth and symptoms during treatment and in preventing the return of symptoms during 12-month follow-up.

Administration, Intranasal↗

A double-blind randomized study of the treatment of endometriosis with nafarelin or nafarelin plus norethisterone.

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of nafarelin 200 micrograms (Group A), nafarelin 400 micrograms (Group B) and the combination of nafarelin 200 micrograms and norethisterone 1.2 mg (Group C) daily, in treating symptoms of endometriosis, American Fertility Society score and adverse events during 6 months of treatment. A prospective, randomized, double-blind parallel group study was performed in two centers and 49 women with endometriosis diagnosed laparoscopically were included. The patients were seen monthly for physical examination and records were taken for bleeding pattern, symptom score and adverse events. A control laparoscopy was performed at the end of 6 months of treatment. All patients were followed 6 months after treatment. At 3 and 6 months the pelvic examination total score had decreased significantly in all three groups. The total endometriosis score was significantly reduced in Groups B and C. After 2 months the total symptom score showed a significant decrease in Groups B and C. The frequency of hot flushes during the first month of treatment was lowest in Group C, but during the rest of treatment there were no differences between the groups. Best bleeding control was obtained in Group C. We conclude that nafarelin 200 micrograms daily has as good an effect on endometriosis symptoms as nafarelin 400 micrograms daily, and the addition of norethisterone 1.2 mg results in fewer hot flushes and better bleeding control.

Adult↗

Treatment with nafarelin for endometriosis in young women. Efficacy, safety and lipid metabolism. Niigata Nafarelin Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety and effect on lipid metabolism of treatment with nafarelin acetate for clinical endometriosis symptoms in young women. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted on subjects who were 19-29 years of age with clinical symptoms and signs of endometriosis demonstrated by laparoscopy, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography or pelvic examination. For 24 weeks, 34 women received intranasal nafarel, 200 mg twice daily. The main outcome measures were changes in signs and symptoms, lumbar bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and serum parameters of lipid metabolism. RESULTS: Symptoms and signs of endometriosis decreased significantly during treatment and at the first posttreatment menses. CA-125 level decreased significantly, from 84.0 +/- 20.2 U/mL at baseline to 13.4 +/- 1.9 at the 24th week (P = .0014). The mean high density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, apoprotein A-I and A-II, lipoprotein (a) and remnant lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly increased, and cholesterol ester transfer protein activity slightly increased, by the 24th week but fell to baseline values by the first posttreatment menses. Despite a low mean serum estradiol level (20 pg/mL) at the end of treatment, the reported incidence of hot flushes was low (24%), and only one woman withdrew because of hypoestrogenic symptoms. CONCLUSION: Twenty-four-week nafarelin treatment for clinical endometriosis symptoms in women < or = 29 years was safe and effective.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

A randomized, parallel, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of nafarelin versus danazol in the treatment of endometriosis in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nafarelin, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue, versus danazol in the treatment of women with endometriosis in Taiwan. METHODS: Fifty-nine women with laparoscopically and pathologically confirmed endometriosis were randomized to receive nafarelin or danazol for 180 days. Efficacy was assessed from mean changes in laparoscopy score (LS) and total symptom severity score (TSSS). Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters, including hematology, hepatic function, blood pressure, and lipid levels, were monitored for safety evaluations. RESULTS: All demographic and baseline factors, except body weight, were comparable between the 2 treatment groups. Both nafarelin and danazol satisfactorily resolved pelvic tenderness, induration, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. No significant differences were noted in efficacy endpoints between nafarelin and danazol regarding LS and TSSS at 90 and 180 days of treatment. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups regarding the overall incidence of AEs, except for laboratory-related AEs. However, nafarelin tended to have less impact than danazol on aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase, and nafarelin was better tolerated than danazol regarding changes in lipid profiles. Both treatments had little or no effect on hematologic parameters. CONCLUSION: Nafarelin and danazol demonstrated similar clinical efficacy, but nafarelin was associated with fewer laboratory changes and a stable lipid profile, relative to danazol. Moreover, intranasally administered nafarelin is noninvasive, and may be a more comfortable and safer alternative to slow-release injectable GnRH agonists. Based on this study, we suggest that nafarelin, like other GnRH analogues, may be a treatment of choice for Taiwanese women with endometriosis. However, direct comparative studies of nafarelin with slow-release injectable GnRH agonists are now required.

Adult↗

A prospective randomized comparison of routine buserelin acetate and a decreasing dosage of nafarelin acetate with a low-dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a draw-back nafarelin acetate protocol with routine buserelin acetate administration for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Mie University School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan. PATIENT(S): One hundred sixty-nine women treated with IVF and 183 women treated with ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): Nafarelin acetate and buserelin acetate in ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF and ICSI were administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The concentrations of estradiol (E(2)), FSH, LH, gonadotropin dosages; the number of oocytes retrieved, oocytes fertilized, and embryos; and pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): A prospective study was conducted with 44 cycles for 34 couples with nafarelin acetate (group 1) and 47 cycles for 40 couples with buserelin acetate (group 2) with a long IVF protocol; 68 cycles for 46 couples with nafarelin acetate (group 3) and 56 cycles for 39 couples with buserelin acetate (group 4) with a short IVF protocol; 39 cycles for 32 couples with nafarelin acetate (group 5) and 50 cycles for 30 couples with buserelin acetate (group 6) with a long ICSI protocol; and 87 cycles for 60 couples with nafarelin acetate (group 7) and 81 cycles for 61 couples with buserelin acetate (group 8) with a short ICSI protocol. Patients were randomized to receive either full-dose nafarelin acetate (200 microg b.i.d.) treatment for 7 days followed by half-dose nafarelin acetate (200 microg daily) or buserelin acetate (300 microg t.i.d.). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline concentrations of E(2) and FSH, concentrations of E(2), P4, FSH, LH on hCG administration, gonadotropin dosage, the number of oocytes retrieved and embryos transferred, or pregnancy rates between groups 1 and 2, groups 3 and 4, groups 5 and 6, and groups 7 and 8. CONCLUSION(S): Full-dose nafarelin acetate treatment for 7 days followed by half-dose nafarelin acetate ("draw-back" protocol) is an effective new protocol for IVF and ICSI.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist analog (nafarelin): a useful diagnostic agent for the distinction of constitutional growth delay from hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

To determine the usefulness of a GnRH agonist analog as a diagnostic test to distinguish between constitutional delay of growth (CGD) in boys with Tanner stage I of sexual development and patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH), we evaluated six boys (mean age 15 yr 4 m) and five HH patients (mean age 20 yr 4 m). In addition, 20 normal healthy men aged 21 yr to 50 yr received either nafarelin or GnRH followed two weeks later by the other test in order to compare the efficacy of each of these tests and to evaluate the optimal sampling times for the nafarelin test. All subjects were healthy, and had not received hormonal replacement for at least 2 months prior to enrollment in the study. Each man had four baseline blood samples before and at timed intervals following the administration of either GnRH or nafarelin. Each of the patients had blood withdrawn every 15 min during 12 h overnight followed by a single s.c. injection of nafarelin (1 microgram(s)/kg up to 100 microgram(s)), except two HH patients who did not have an overnight study. Blood samples were obtained at timed intervals for 24 h. LH, FSH, T and E2 were measured by RIA. Baseline concentrations of plasma LH, FSH and T were similar before the administration of either GnRH or nafarelin in the group of normal men. Peak stimulation of plasma LH, FSH and T released by nafarelin was significantly higher, and it took a longer time to reach the peak maximum, than after GnRH (p < 0.001). Mean nocturnal LH was 5.5 +/- 0.9 IU/I for the CGD group, and 2.7 +/- 0.7 IU/I for HH (p < 0.02). Mean nocturnal FSH was 5.1 +/- 1.0 and 2.5 +/- 0.2 IU/I whereas mean nocturnal T concentrations were 4.2 +/- 0.8 and 0.7 +/- 0.2 nmol/I (CGD vs HH, respectively, p < 0.02). Peak LH responses to nafarelin were 36.9 +/- 8.9 IU/I for the CGD group, and 7.0 +/- 2.0 IU/I for the HH group (p < 0.001). Peak FSH released by nafarelin was 14.2 +/- 2.4 IU/I for the CGD group and 4.8 +/- 2.0 IU/I for the HH group (p < 0.02). Peak T was reached 24 h following nafarelin injection and was 5.7 +/- 1.7 nmol/I for the CGD group and 0.3 +/- 0.2 nmol/I for the HH group (p < 0.001). The results obtained indicate that in early stages of puberty (before detectable changes of sexual maturation) the nafarelin test, with measurements of LH, FSH and T in blood or in urine, is superior to and more practical than overnight hormonal estimates to clearly distinguish CGD from HH.

Adult↗

Nafarelin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and clinical potential in sex hormone-related conditions.

Nafarelin, a synthetic agonist of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) [luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH); gonadorelin] appears likely to join the other GnRH analogues currently used in a range of conditions reliant on gonadotrophins or sex hormones. With repeated administration, the pituitary becomes desensitised, and gonadotrophin release, and therefore sex hormone synthesis, are inhibited. Nafarelin has proved to be comparable to danazol in the management of women with endometriosis, with fewer potentially harmful adverse effects. Nafarelin has also been used effectively in in vitro fertilisation programmes, and in hirsute women and those with uterine leiomyoma, particularly to induce preoperative fibroid shrinkage. The drug shrinks hypertrophic tissue in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, although treatment would need to be maintained indefinitely and therefore should probably be reserved for those unsuitable for prostatectomy. Preliminary data suggest that nafarelin is equivalent to diethylstilbestrol (stilboestrol) in terms of disease-free survival in men with prostate cancer. As a reliable method of contraception, nafarelin gives unpredictable results in men and the promising results in women may be offset by hypoestrogenic side effects. Nafarelin may join other GnRH agonists which are now routinely used in the management of children with central or combined precocious puberty. Nafarelin is readily and rapidly absorbed following intranasal delivery, and is protected to some extent from enzymatic degradation. The resultant relatively long elimination half-life allows once- or twice-daily administration. Estrogen depletion accounts for the most common side effects associated with nafarelin, including hot flushes and vaginal dryness, which are mild and tolerable in most patients. Reversible resorption of trabecular bone can occur during nafarelin therapy, perhaps necessitating cyclical treatment to enable bone mass to recover. Nafarelin, therefore, looks likely to find a role in the treatment of women with endometriosis, and results achieved in other conditions dependent on the pituitary-gonadal axis are promising.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

A prospective randomized single-blind comparative trial of nafarelin acetate with buserelin in long-protocol gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue controlled in-vitro fertilization cycles.

The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to control ovulation induction cycles for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has been shown to increase the pregnancy rate and live birth rate compared with non-analogue cycles. Different formulations of GnRH agonist are available with different routes and frequencies of administration. In this prospective study, the efficacy and safety of intranasal nafarelin and buserelin as adjunctive therapy during IVF were assessed. A total of 240 female patients were recruited to the study and in the first phase patients were randomized to receive either intranasal nafarelin 200 micrograms twice daily or buserelin 200 micrograms five times daily. In the second phase, patients received either nafarelin 400 micrograms twice daily or buserelin 200 micrograms five times daily. Nafarelin 400 micrograms and buserelin 200 micrograms both produced clinical pregnancy rates of 31% per recruit and 39% per embryo transfer. The rates for nafarelin 200 micrograms were 23 and 37% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rates, by either drug or dosage. The time taken for pituitary down-regulation to be achieved was significantly longer on nafarelin 200 micrograms than on either nafarelin 400 micrograms or buserelin. The total number of days stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin required to reach criteria for human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration was significantly longer on buserelin than on either dose of nafarelin. Median serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of HCG administration were significantly higher on either dose of nafarelin than on buserelin.

Administration, Intranasal↗

Dose-dependent inhibition of pituitary-ovarian function during administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonistic analog (nafarelin).

To determine if treatment with the GnRH agonistic analog nafarelin could reliably block ovulation while only partially disrupting ovarian estrogen production, three degrees of pituitary-ovarian inhibition were investigated. Thirty-two women with ovulatory menstrual cycles were given 125 micrograms (group (Gp) I), 250 micrograms (Gp II), or 1000 micrograms (Gp III) nafarelin daily by intranasal spray. Twenty-seven women completed 6 months of treatment. Basal serum FSH concentrations decreased (P less than 0.01) in all groups. Suppression of serum LH was dose dependent and significant (P less than 0.01) only in Gps II and III. Pituitary desensitization to nafarelin developed in all groups. Peak LH responses to nafarelin decreased by about 70% (Gps I and II) and 95% (Gp III). Basal serum estradiol levels after 1 month of treatment were approximately 70 pg/ml (Gp I) and 25 pg/ml (Gps II and III). Serum estradiol levels increased acutely in Gps I and II, but not in Gp III, in response to each dose of nafarelin. Thus, average daily estradiol levels in Gp II were higher than those in Gp III. Serum testosterone and androstenedione levels decreased slightly (P less than 0.05; Gp II) or by 50% (P less than 0.01; Gp III) during treatment. The effects of nafarelin on ovulatory function also were dose-dependent. In Gp I there were four ovulations (progesterone, greater than 4 ng/ml) and seven instances of luteinization (progesterone, 2-4 ng/ml) during 73 months of nafarelin administration. In contrast, there were no ovulations during 58 and 44 months in Gps II and III, respectively. After discontinuance of nafarelin, ovulatory menstrual function returned rapidly in all women. In summary, inhibition of pituitary-ovarian function by daily intranasal nafarelin administration is dose dependent. Gonadotroph sensitivity to 125 micrograms is variable, and there is inconsistent inhibition of ovulation. Daily doses of 250 or 1000 micrograms analog reliably inhibit ovulation, but are associated with either moderate (Gp II) or marked (Gp III) reduction of ovarian estradiol secretion. The effects of these reduced levels of circulating estradiol on bone are not known. Further investigation, with dosage adjusted according to individual patient sensitivity, may lead to the development of a clinically acceptable contraceptive which consistently inhibits ovulation while maintaining serum estradiol levels sufficient to prevent osteoporosis.

Administration, Intranasal↗

The rapid ovarian secretory response to pituitary stimulation by the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist nafarelin in sexual precocity.

We evaluated a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) as a potential single stimulus to both pituitary and ovarian secretion in 13 girls with true precocious puberty. We compared the GnRH agonist [6-D-(2-naphthyl)alanine]GnRH acetate (nafarelin, Syntex) administered as a single sc injection of 0.2 microgram/kg to GnRH infused iv in a dose of 2 micrograms/kg X h for 3 h and assessed the response of plasma steroid intermediates in estradiol (E2) biosynthesis. Although serum LH and FSH levels increased to similar peaks 3 h after commencing GnRH and nafarelin testing, they rose faster (P less than 0.01 at 1 h) and remained elevated longer (P less than 0.05 at 24 h) after nafarelin administration. At the third hour of testing with either agent, LH and FSH rose 8.8- and 3.4-fold, respectively (P less than 0.001 vs. baseline), whereas the rise in E2 was inconsistent and averaged only one third (P less than 0.02). However, plasma E2 increased later after nafarelin, but not after GnRH, rising from a baseline level of 30 +/- 6 (+/- SEM) to 115 +/- 13 pg/ml at 24 h (P less than 0.001). The least E2 response to nafarelin at this time was 150%. This rise is probably an underestimate of the maximum E2 rise, since a 6-fold response to nafarelin was found at 12 h in patients sampled then. Measurement of steroid intermediates from progesterone and 17 alpha-hydroxypregnenolone to E2 indicated that the response to nafarelin was typical of normal ovarian follicular secretion. That is, plasma levels of the intermediates in E2 biosynthesis rose less than 2-fold, and only the elevations in androstenedione, from 58 +/- 10 to 78 +/- 16 ng/dl (P less than 0.05), and estrone, from 14 +/- 3 to 38 +/- 7 pg/ml (P less than 0.02), at 24 h were significant. The greater effectiveness of nafarelin than GnRH in stimulating E2 secretion appears to be related to the more prolonged gonadotropin response. The magnitude, consistency, specificity, and rapidity of the gonadotropin and E2 responses to nafarelin indicate that this is a promising agent for rapidly testing pituitary and ovarian function simultaneously.

Child↗

Disposition of nafarelin acetate, a potent agonist of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, in rats and rhesus monkeys.

Nafarelin acetate, [6-(3-(2-naphthyl)-D-Ala)]-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), is a synthetic LHRH agonist. In the suppression of estrus in female rats, nafarelin acetate was about 200 times as potent as LHRH. We have studied the distribution and excretion of radiolabeled nafarelin acetate administered iv to rats and rhesus monkeys and have also compared the pharmacokinetics of nafarelin acetate to LHRH in these two species. Distribution of a single 100-micrograms dose [14C]nafarelin acetate into tissues in male rats was rapid and of the 13 tissues assayed, highest concentrations of radioactivity were observed in the kidneys, liver, and intestines. The urine to feces ratio of nafarelin-associated 14C was 4:1 in rhesus monkeys and 1:3 in rats. Nafarelin acetate and LHRH given iv to female rhesus monkeys in approximately equimolar doses (6.5 nmol/kg) had terminal plasma t1/2 values of 120 min and 33 min, and systemic clearance values of 2.7 ml/min/kg and 31.4 ml/min/kg, respectively. In female rats, the plasma t1/2 was 33.6 min for nafarelin acetate and 6.7 min for LHRH, and the systemic clearance values for nafarelin acetate and LHRH were 12.0 ml/min/kg and 57.6 ml/min/kg, respectively, after approximately equimolar doses.

Animals↗

Comparison between nafarelin acetate and D-Trp6-LHRH for temporary pituitary suppression in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients: a prospective crossover study.

PURPOSE: Nafarelin acetate is a new gonadotropin releasing (GnRH) agonist analogue with unique potency, intranasal administration, and convenient storage. Hence, nafarelin was considered as an alternative for temporary pituitary suppression in patients undergoing ovulation induction in IVF. A crossover treatment in a prospective study was performed including 40 women with bilateral obstructed tubes and normal ovarian function, treated in 80 ovulation induction cycles using the long protocol. Twenty patients used nafarelin acetate 600 micrograms/daily in their first cycle and received D-Trp6-LHRH, 0.5 mg/daily, in their following cycle. The other 20 women used decapeptyl in their cycle and received nafarelin in the second. RESULTS: Estradiol suppression was achieved by both D-Trp6-LHRH and nafarelin at equal time intervals. The average total number of ampoules (P = 0.0005) and the length of administration of hMG required for ovarian stimulation (P = 0.0002) and the time interval between GnRHa initiation to oocyte retrieval (P = 0.04) was significantly lower in nafarelin cycles. The number and the distribution between large and small follicles as well as the average number of oocytes retrieved did not differ between the two GnRH analogues. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that nafarelin acetate is comparable to D-Trp6-LHRH for temporary pituitary suppression used for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF patients. However, using nafarelin ovarian stimulation was achieved with few ampoules of hMG, administered for a shorter period of time, thus with a lesser cost.

Adult↗

A randomized double blind placebo controlled trial of the effects on bone metabolism of the combination of nafarelin acetate and norethisterone.

OBJECTIVE: We observed the effects on bone metabolism of the addition of different doses of oral norethisterone during treatment with the GnRH agonist nafarelin (Synarel, Syntex). PATIENTS: Ninety-four women with a subjective complaint of heavy menstrual blood loss or objective evidence of endometriosis received intra-nasal nafarelin 400 micrograms daily for 6 months and also received, in a randomized, double blind manner, either 0.7 mg (n = 24), 1.4 mg (n = 23) or 2.45 mg (n = 23) of oral norethisterone or placebo (n = 24) daily. Follow-up was continued for a further 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (33%) left the study prematurely and three patients were non-compliant with the study drug. By 6 months significant increases in urinary calcium/creatinine ratio were seen, compared to baseline, in the nafareline and placebo (P = 0.001, n = 14), 0.7 mg (P = 0.04, n = 13) and 1.4 mg norethisterone groups (P = 0.009, n = 17) but not in the nafarelin or 2.45 mg norethisterone groups (P = 0.72, n = 16). Densitometry of the spine, however, showed decreases at 6 months in all groups: 6.14% (P = 0.0004, n = 11), 5.46% n = 0.0006, n = 13), 3.93% (P = 0.008, n = 14) and 4.04% (P = 0.004, n = 16) for the groups receiving nafarelin and placebo, nafarelin and norethisterone 0.7, 1.4 and 2.45 mg respectively. Six months after stopping nafarelin, with or without norethisterone, bone mass was not different from baseline. CONCLUSION: The concomitant daily use of up to 2.45 mg of norethisterone does not eliminate the bone demineralization seen during GnRH agonist therapy with nafarelin in premenopausal women.

Administration, Oral↗

Clinical use of nafarelin in the treatment of leiomyomas. A review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy and safety of nafarelin in the treatment of leiomyomas. STUDY DESIGN: A literature review of published clinical trials was conducted. Six studies, including a total of 602 patients with leiomyomas, were reviewed. Patients received intranasal nafarelin, 50-400 micrograms twice daily for three to six months. Vaginal bleeding patterns, leiomyoma and uterine size, surgical conditions and adverse effects were assessed. RESULTS: Nafarelin consistently suppressed estrogen production, reduced leiomyoma and uterine size, and controlled menorrhagia. The significant reduction in uterine bleeding and amenorrhea resulting from administration of nafarelin was associated with a rise in mean hemoglobin concentrations. In addition, nafarelin improved hematologic parameters in women with and without anemia. Nafarelin was well tolerated, although hot flushes were the most commonly reported adverse events. Measured bone mineral density decreased significantly during treatment, although by six to nine months post-treatment, it increased to values not significantly different from baseline. The adverse effects of nafarelin were generally reversible after treatment withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Nafarelin treatment of women with symptomatic leiomyomas effectively decreases uterine bleeding; improves hematologic parameters; manages symptoms of menometrorrhagia, dysmenorrhea and pelvic discomfort; reduces uterine and myoma size; and is well tolerated. Reduction in bone mineral density occurs, but levels return to, or near, baseline levels within six months after treatment.

Abdominal Pain↗

Decrease in symptoms, blood loss and uterine size with nafarelin acetate before abdominal hysterectomy: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nafarelin before hysterectomy in a prospective placebo-controlled trial, we randomized 188 pre-menopausal women with uterine fibroids (n = 111), menometrorrhagia (n = 58) or pelvic pain (n = 19) to receive either nafarelin (200 micrograms twice daily as a nasal spray) or a placebo for 3 months before abdominal hysterectomy. The data analysis could be performed in 166 women, of whom 107 received nafarelin and 59 a placebo. Nafarelin led to a rise in blood haemoglobin (5.5 g/l) and to a decrease in uterine volume (23.7%). This, however, gave no objective benefit during surgery (similar operative durations and blood losses). The uteri from patients treated with nafarelin (255.5 +/- 12.6 g, mean +/- SD) were significantly lighter (P = 0.029) than those from patients treated with a placebo (346.2 +/- 35.7 g). Histological examination of the fibroids or uteri revealed changes typical for hypo-oestrogenism, but no specific histological pattern could be established. The endometrium was proliferative in 56% and showed mild hyperplastic features in 10% of patients given nafarelin, whereas the respective figures for the placebo group were 41 and 0%. Hot flushes were the most common side-effects, being reported by 61% in the nafarelin group and 35% in the placebo group. Nafarelin can be useful as a pre-surgical adjunct in a patient scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy if there is a need to raise the haemoglobin concentration or to reduce the size of the uterus.

Adult↗

Bioavailability of nafarelin in healthy volunteers.

The bioavailability of a single dose of intranasal nafarelin was evaluated in 15 healthy female volunteers. Each subject received a 400 micrograms intranasal and a 25 micrograms intravenous dose of nafarelin separated by at least 7 days. Blood samples were obtained frequently after each dose for determination of nafarelin plasma levels. After intravenous administration, time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 2 minutes, and maximum serum concentration (Cmax) was 8.2 +/- 2.09 (SD) ng/ml. For intranasal nafarelin, mean Tmax was 18.4 +/- 7.9 minutes (range, 5 to 40 minutes), and Cmax was 2.04 +/- 1.29 ng/ml (range, 0.49 to 5.7 ng/ml). Systemic bioavailability of nafarelin ranged from 1.15% to 5.62% and averaged 2.82% +/- 1.23%. Nafarelin's bioavailability is adequate to achieve the desired therapeutic effect because of its inherent high biologic potency and its pharmacokinetic properties. Nafarelin is readily absorbed by the nasal mucosa, and therapeutic blood levels are rapidly achieved and maintained for a prolonged period of time.

Administration, Intranasal↗