Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “NEWBORN SCREENING”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2025

The acceptability of blood spot screening and genome sequencing in newborn screening: a systematic review examining evidence and frameworks.

BACKGROUND: Population-wide newborn blood spot screening programmes are a successful public health intervention used to detect whether the baby is at risk of certain rare conditions, with the aim of earlier diagnosis and provision of optimal care and treatment. Evaluating candidate conditions to include in newborn blood spot and genetic sequencing raises questions regarding acceptability to parents/carers. METHODS: In the context of the possible expansion of the newborn blood spot screening programme in the United Kingdom, this review aimed to systematically review research on the acceptability to parents of newborn blood spot screening and genetic sequencing. A protocol was developed prior to commencing the review and was registered on the PROSPERO database. A team of researchers carried out the review, with checking at all stages carried out by at least two individuals. We included research published after 2013 with participants who were pregnant or a recent parent of a newborn and were resident in a high-income country. We included quantitative and qualitative studies that investigated the acceptability to parents/carers of newborn blood spot screening or genetic sequencing. Quantitative studies were narratively synthesised, and theories/frameworks identified and evaluated. Qualitative studies were analysed for recurring themes, and a meta-synthesis was carried out to compare and contrast these two types of data. We quality appraised included articles using tools appropriate for their study design. RESULTS: Searches were carried out in September to November 2023 and screening identified 25 relevant research articles. Just over half were from North America, with four existing reviews and nine qualitative studies. Domains of acceptability described in the literature were: support for screening; level of anxiety, information and knowledge; consent; views of the procedure; and support after screening. The research indicated consensus support for blood spot screening, and for expanding to some other conditions, although some parental anxiety was reported. Parents/carers mostly perceived that they had received sufficient information, but the timing of this could be improved. While parents indicated interest in genomic screening, studies highlighted the need for clearer consent procedures and greater support for parents following genomic screening than for blood spot screening. Only three included studies reported using any kind of theoretical framework. DISCUSSION: Most parents/carers found newborn blood spot screening programmes to be acceptable and favoured their large-scale implementation. A minority of parents/carers expressed concerns regarding the acceptability of processes underpinning newborn blood spot screening, such as consent, the timing of receiving information and support available after testing. More research is needed regarding the acceptability of newborn genomic sequencing screening programmes, which are less established compared with newborn blood spot screening programmes. LIMITATIONS: The over-representation of studies conducted in the United States has implications for the applicability of findings to other countries where testing is not typically mandatory and health systems differ considerably. Most studies were of cross-sectional design and there was limited representation of people from lower incomes and non-white ethnicity. While the inclusion of studies only in populations of future or very recent parents provided coherence to the findings, unclear reporting of participants may have resulted in under- or overinclusion of some studies. FUNDING: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR159927.

ACCEPTABILITY↗
PubMed2025

Newborn screening for common genetic variants associated with permanent hearing loss: Implementation in Ontario and review of the first 3 years.

PURPOSE: Early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) programs using audiometric screening techniques alone have a limited ability to detect noncongenital childhood permanent hearing loss (PHL). In 2019, Ontario launched universal newborn screening (NBS) for PHL risk factors, including congenital cytomegalovirus and 22 common variants in GJB2 and SLC26A4. Here, we describe our experience in screening for genetic risk factors. METHODS: Ontario newborns who participated in universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) were offered risk factor screening using dried blood spots (DBS) collected for conventional newborn screening. The screening was conducted using a custom MassArray assay, and positive results were confirmed by Sanger sequencing or polymerase chain reaction. Diagnostic audiological assessments were performed for all screen-positive infants. RESULTS: Of the 412,424 infants screened, 93 had 2 variants in GJB2 or SLC26A4. Of these, 72 had confirmed PHL, 20 had normal hearing, and 1 declined follow-up. Thirteen infants with PHL (1 in 31,724; 11.8% of screen positives) were not identified through audiometric testing as they passed (3) or missed (10) the screening. Importantly, among infants who ultimately received cochlear implants, the detection of genetic etiology through NBS led to an accelerated time to diagnosis, assessment, and intervention. CONCLUSION: Genetic screening has strengthened UNHS and care for infants with or at risk of PHL in Ontario. This study is a step toward the broader inclusion of genomic testing in NBS.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs.

PURPOSE: Over 30 international studies are exploring newborn sequencing (NBSeq) to expand the range of genetic disorders included in newborn screening. Substantial variability in gene selection across programs exists, highlighting the need for a systematic approach to prioritize genes. METHODS: We assembled a data set comprising 25 characteristics about each of the 4390 genes included in 27 NBSeq programs. We used regression analysis to identify several predictors of inclusion and developed a machine learning model to rank genes for public health consideration. RESULTS: Among 27 NBSeq programs, the number of genes analyzed ranged from 134 to 4299, with only 74 (1.7%) genes included by over 80% of programs. The most significant associations with gene inclusion across programs were presence on the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (inclusion increase of 74.7%, CI: 71.0%-78.4%), robust evidence on the natural history (29.5%, CI: 24.6%-34.4%), and treatment efficacy (17.0%, CI: 12.3%-21.7%) of the associated genetic disease. A boosted trees machine learning model using 13 predictors achieved high accuracy in predicting gene inclusion across programs (area under the curve = 0.915, R2 = 84%). CONCLUSION: The machine learning model developed here provides a ranked list of genes that can adapt to emerging evidence and regional needs, enabling more consistent and informed gene selection in NBSeq initiatives.

Humans↗
PubMed2024

Estimating the sensitivity of genomic newborn screening for treatable inherited metabolic disorders.

PURPOSE: Over 30 research groups and companies are exploring newborn screening using genomic sequencing (NBSeq), but the sensitivity of this approach is not well understood. METHODS: We identified individuals with treatable inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs) and ascertained the proportion whose DNA analysis revealed explanatory deleterious variants (EDVs). We examined variables associated with EDV detection and estimated the sensitivity of DNA-first NBSeq. We further predicted the annual rate of true-positive and false-negative NBSeq results in the United States for several conditions on the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel. RESULTS: We identified 635 individuals with 80 unique IMDs. In univariate analyses, Black race (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.89, P = .02) and public insurance (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.91, P = .02) were less likely to be associated with finding EDVs. Had all individuals been screened with NBSeq, the sensitivity would have been 80.3%. We estimated that between 0 and 649.9 cases of Recommended Uniform Screening Panel IMDs would be missed annually by NBSeq in the United States. CONCLUSION: The overall sensitivity of NBSeq for treatable IMDs is estimated at 80.3%. That sensitivity will likely be lower for Black infants and those who are on public insurance.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Genetic Newborn Screening for Retinoblastoma: A Belgian Initiative Baby Detect.

Baby Detect Project, started in September 2022, aimed to create a newborn screening test using targeted next-generation sequencing for all early-onset, treatable, and serious conditions. The elaborated gene panel covers 405 genes, associated with 165 genetic conditions, and includes RB1, linked to retinoblastoma, the only oncological disease tested for. Germline RB1 mutations concern around 50% of all retinoblastoma cases and 100% of the most severe, bilateral cases. Ninety percent of them occur de novo, which delays the diagnosis by about a year with subsequent loss of vision and sometimes the eye itself. Detecting children with germline RB1 mutation at birth would greatly improve functional and anatomic outcomes, limiting invasive treatments and general anesthesias through early childhood. We discuss herein the novel approach of population screening, the rationale for newborn testing for RB1 mutations, the incidence of expected cases, the reliability of the test and its costs. The next step is to move to a nation-scale population; this initiative marks a landmark in retinoblastoma patients' care.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Assessment of the variant prioritization strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study.

PURPOSE: Genomic sequencing offers the opportunity to screen for hundreds of rare genetic conditions. To minimize potential negative impact on families and clinical services, it is crucial to reduce false-positive results while prioritizing clinical utility. We present an automated variant prioritization approach in the Generation Study, a research study investigating genomic sequencing in 100,000 newborns in England. Prioritized variants will subsequently undergo manual review by a registered clinical scientist and a specialist clinician before being reported back to parents. METHODS: We assessed specificity of our automated variant prioritization approach in 34,410 samples not enriched for rare diseases and sensitivity in 546 samples from patients with diagnostic variants in genes relevant to newborn screening. We used coverage and copy-number variants callability metrics to evaluate variant detection. RESULTS: We estimated that 3% to 5% of samples will have prioritized variants that require manual review and that <1% of cases will have reportable variants requiring further confirmation of the condition. Sensitivity in genes included in the Generation Study was estimated to be approximately 80%. Gene-level specificity results led to changes in variant prioritization rules and conditions that are included. CONCLUSION: Gene-specific assessment of variant prioritization is crucial to establish analytical validity prior to inclusion in genomic newborn screening.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Next-generation newborn screening: feasibility of combined genetic and biochemical testing for 95 treatable inherited metabolic disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is gaining attention in newborn screening (NBS) for its ability to detect treatable genetic disorders, especially those without a biochemical footprint. However, NGS-NBS requires interpreting variants without phenotype information or family trio analysis. Biochemical tests, preferably in dried blood spots (DBS), are therefore useful to confirm the pathogenicity of variants identified by NGS-NBS and increase its specificity and sensitivity. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the potential of combined genetic-biochemical testing for 95 treatable Inherited Metabolic Disorders (IMD) considered eligible for NGS-NBS (100 genes) previously identified by our research group. METHODS: We reviewed the Collaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR) and carried out systematic literature reviews in PubMed and Embase to identify biochemical tests for 95 IMD. Biochemical tests conducted on DBS were differentiated from tests that require referral. RESULTS: We identified DBS-biochemical tests for 72 of the 95 IMD (77/100 genes). DBS-based biochemical tests for 55 IMD (60 genes) are already implemented in NBS. For the other 23 IMD, biochemical tests in non-DBS specimens are reported, although some are less sensitive when measured at neonatal age in presymptomatic infants. CONCLUSION: We present a comprehensive overview of current biochemical tests for 95 IMD. These tests can be used to confirm inconclusive NGS-NBS results, and combined genetic-biochemical testing is expected to improve both the negative and positive predictive values of NBS programs.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Sex-Specific Diagnostic Inequality in Fabry Disease: Lessons Learned from Analysis of Newborn Screening and Cascade Testing in Tennessee from 2017 to 2024.

INTRODUCTION: Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disease caused by alpha-galactosidase A (aGAL) deficiency. Newborn screening (NBS) programs for FD have been implemented in several US states; however, its effectiveness in identifying affected females remains uncertain. We hypothesized that sex-specific inequality of NBS-based detection of FD results in different diagnostic pathways for males and females with FD. METHODS: We compared diagnostic approaches for males and females with FD using Tennessee NBS results and Vanderbilt Lysosomal Storage Disorders Database (VLSDD). Sex-specific detection differences were assessed using Fisher's exact test (&#x3b1; = 0.05). RESULTS: Tennessee NBS identified 25 males but no females with FD from 2017 to 2024. In VLSDD, among 81 individuals with FD, sex distribution was nearly equal (42 males, 39 females). Among males, 26/42 (62%) were diagnosed via NBS, 7/42 (17%) through known family history, and 9/42 (21%) based on clinical symptoms. All 16 males diagnosed through non-NBS were born before its implementation. In contrast, none of the 39 females were diagnosed through NBS (p value <0.05). Of these, 13/39 (33%) were diagnosed through cascade testing following their sons' detection by NBS, with a median age at diagnosis of 28 years (25th-75th percentile: 24.5-34.0). Of the remaining 26 females, 12/26 (46%) were diagnosed after a family member was diagnosed through clinical symptoms and 14/26 (54%) were diagnosed through clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: NBS effectively identifies affected males but fails to detect females with FD, though it can indirectly facilitate diagnosis of older female relatives.

Humans↗
PubMed1978

Newborn screening for maple syrup urine disease (branched-chain ketoaciduria).

Routine newborn screening for maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) has been conducted since 1964, and more than 9 1/2 million newborns throughout the world have been tested with use of a bacterial inhibition assay (BIA) for leucine on dried filter paper blood specimens. Forty-three confirmed cases of the "classical" and the "intermediate" variant forms have been detected. The frequency of MSUD, based on these data, is approximately one in 224,000 newborns. The sensitivity and the specificity of the leucine BIA are demonstrated. There are several problems in routine screening for MSUD, including the fact that the "intermittent" variant form will be missed. A brief summary of the clinical course of the 13 cases detected by our collaborative laboratories is presented.

Bacillus subtilis↗
PubMed2025

Reduction of false-positive results with biochemical second-tier testing for newborn screening of Pompe disease.

PURPOSE: To review the performance and outcomes of a second-tier newborn screening test for Pompe disease. METHODS: We followed our previously published screening approach that reduces false-positive results by incorporating creatine and creatinine levels and postanalytic tools in a second-tier test. RESULTS: We reviewed 1879 blood samples from neonates born in 11 states. Second-tier testing effectively reduced false-positive results, compared with first-tier enzyme testing alone. Only a small number of screen-positive cases (n = 7) were confirmed to have infantile-onset Pompe disease. No false-negative cases of infantile-onset Pompe disease were identified in this cohort, and 6 cases of possible late-onset Pompe disease were not detected with this approach. CONCLUSION: This tiered screening strategy discriminated well between true- and false-positive results and improved the positive predictive value. However, it did not reliably differentiate between infantile- and late-onset Pompe disease.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Sex-Based Disparities in Fabry Disease Cause Challenges in Newborn Screening.

INTRODUCTION: Fabry disease (FD) is a multi-systemic, X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by decreased &#x3b1;-galactosidase activity. Early diagnosis enables timely treatment, but enzyme-based newborn screening (NBS) may not detect affected females. We hypothesized that enzyme-based NBS limitations contribute to sex-based diagnostic disparities in FD and investigated these differences. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analyses used data from the Fabry Registry (FR: 2001-2023) and Tennessee NBS (2017-2024). Sex differences in diagnosis via NBS, biochemical phenotype, symptom onset, and treatment initiation were analyzed using Wilcoxon and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Among 8,657 FR individuals, 73 (67 males, 6 females) were identified via NBS. FR data show that affected females had significantly higher residual &#x3b1;-galactosidase activity than affected males (leukocyte median: 45.9% vs. 3.9%, plasma median: 32.5% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.0001 for both). FR females had delayed symptom onset (18.1 vs. 11.1 years), later diagnosis (35.5 vs. 30.8 years), and lower treatment rates (51.1% vs. 80.8%) compared to males (all %, p < 0.0001). Tennessee NBS detected 25 males but no females. CONCLUSION: Females with FD have delays in symptom onset, diagnosis, and treatment compared to males. Furthermore, higher residual enzyme activity causes current enzyme-based NBS to miss most females. Incorporating sex-specific cutoffs and/or molecular sequencing into NBS could improve early detection and reduce sex-based disparities.

Humans↗
PubMed1979

Sickle cell trait/hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin trait. Misdiagnosis as sickle cell anemia by newborn screening.

A black female infant, reported as a result of mandatory newborn screening to have sickle cell anemia, was found at 8 months of age to have instead the entirely benign disorder sickle cell trait/hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin trait. The finding of hemoglobin S without Hb A does not suffice for the diagnosis of homozygous Hb S. Screening programs that diagnose sickle cell aneimia without first demonstrating sickle hemoglobin in both parents will consistently misdiagnose several more benign hemoglobin states as sickle cell anemia.

Anemia, Sickle Cell↗
PubMed2026

The costs of genomic newborn screening in England: A micro-costing analysis from the Generation Study.

PURPOSE: This study estimates the total cost per newborn of delivering genomic newborn screening (gNBS) within the Genomics England-led Generation Study. METHODS: A time-driven activity-based costing approach was used to estimate gNBS costs from recruitment to confirmatory testing. Resource use data were obtained through document review, semi-structured interviews with study staff, and direct observation across six English National Health Service Trusts. Inputs were categorized as labor, consumables, or equipment, with unit costs sourced from published pay scales, catalogs, or literature. Equipment costs were annualized at a discount rate of 3.5%. All costs were estimated in 2025 Great British Pounds (&#xa3;) from the healthcare providers perspective, including overheads and data storage. A one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted, varying key cost parameters (&#xb1;20%) and testing alternative delivery scenarios. RESULTS: gNBS costs &#xa3;1208 per newborn, with sequencing comprising 58% of the total costs, mainly consumables. The cost was reduced by 20% to &#xa3;963 when excluding research-specific recruitment and consent activities to reflect the delivery of gNBS as part of routine clinical care. CONCLUSION: This study provides an estimate of gNBS costs, highlighting sequencing as the main cost driver. Combined with evidence on outcomes and health care utilization, these findings will inform future cost-effectiveness analyses, supporting policy decisions regarding national implementation in England.

Neonatal Screening↗
PubMed2026

Compound muscle action potential amplitudes in newborn screen positive spinal muscular atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes as biomarkers of disease severity in newborn screening (NBS)-positive infants with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 21 infants identified through SMA NBS (11 with 2 SMN2 copies and 10 with 3 SMN2 copies). Baseline and serial right median, ulnar, and fibular motor nerve CMAP amplitudes (millivolts, mV) were obtained during the study. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND). RESULTS: At baseline, infants with 2 SMN2 copies demonstrated significantly lower median, ulnar, and fibular CMAP amplitudes compared with infants with 3 SMN2 copies (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05). In contrast, baseline CHOP-INTEND scores did not differ significantly between the two groups. Prior to genetic confirmation, a right median CMAP amplitude&#xa0;&#x2265;3.2&#xa0;mV predicted&#xa0;&#x2265;3 SMN2 copies. Following treatment, right median and fibular CMAP amplitudes demonstrated significant improvement over time, including in analyses accounting for SMN2 copies number. CONCLUSION: CMAP amplitudes obtained from multiple upper- and lower-extremity motor nerves provided objective electrophysiological measures that distinguished infants with two versus three SMN2 copies, despite similar baseline CHOP-INTEND scores. Furthermore, CMAP abnormalities were detectable in some cases before confirmatory genetic testing results became available. Serial CMAP measurements demonstrated significant longitudinal changes following treatment, whereas functional assessments approached ceiling values, supporting the potential value of electrophysiological monitoring in the era of disease-modifying therapies. SIGNIFICANCE: CMAP assessment is a useful adjunct in the evaluation of infants identified through SMA NBS.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Newborn Screening: Equity for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Families in the Context of Emerging Genomics.

Australia's newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) program is offered to every newborn. It screens for 34 rare conditions with the potential for hundreds more to be added using genomics. Despite NBS being available in Australia since the 1960s, there is a lack of evidence regarding the participation and experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in NBS. As Australia considers a future where genomics might be used in NBS, there is a critical window of opportunity to understand and prioritise the perspectives, hopes and fears of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples regarding the utility of genomics in NBS.

Humans↗