Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “NAAT”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Extragenital testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia in health department clinics in Virginia, 2018-2023.

BACKGROUND: Extragenital testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea infections is now routine in many settings. We assessed temporal and demographic trends in extragenital testing and positivity in public health department clinics in Virginia. METHODS: We analyzed urogenital and extragenital chlamydia/gonorrhea laboratory results for clients aged 15 years or older who attended 116 health department clinics from 2018 to 2023. Test volume and positivity was stratified by anatomic site, year, sex, and age. RESULTS: There were 181,471 client visits with valid test results. The proportion of visits with any extragenital testing increased from 19% to 46% during this time. Male clients were twice as likely as females to receive pharyngeal testing (46% vs. 22%) and five times as likely to be tested rectally (15% vs. 3%). Rectal specimen positivity surpassed urogenital positivity for chlamydia (females and males) and gonorrhea (males only). Overall, one-quarter of clients diagnosed with gonorrhea infections were identified exclusively through extragenital testing, as were 9% of clients with positive chlamydia tests. These proportions increased over time and were greater for younger clients and for males relative to females. Two-thirds of extragenital infections would have been missed by urogenital testing alone, including 40% and 49% of females and 86% and 73% of males with extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea infections respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of clients who received extragenital chlamydia/gonorrhea testing increased over time, extragenital test positivity was high, and it identified infections that would have been missed otherwise. The impact on sexually transmitted infection sequelae and transmission remains unclear.

NAAT

Molecular Diagnostics for WHO Priority Bacterial Pathogens: A Bibliometric Mapping of Diagnostic Platforms, Resistance Markers, and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Trends.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) constrains effective treatment and carries implications for infection control, surveillance, and public health. The World Health Organization (WHO) priority bacterial pathogen framework has intensified the need for diagnostic innovation by redefining research priorities around organisms combining high disease burden with complex resistance profiles. Molecular diagnostics have accordingly moved beyond culture-based workflows, integrating rapid pathogen identification, resistance-marker detection, genomic surveillance, and clinical decision support. The present study conducted a bibliometric mapping of the literature on WHO priority pathogens. Rather than addressing resistance at a general level or a single pathogen or technology, it integrates priority pathogens, molecular platforms, and resistance markers within a single framework, tracing their joint thematic and temporal evolution along an explicit pathogen-platform-marker axis. Scopus-indexed articles and reviews (2000-2025) were retrieved, yielding 1746 publications after screening adapted from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Analyses used Bibliometrix/Biblioshiny, R, and VOSviewer. The literature expanded markedly after 2018, led by China and the United States. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Enterococcus faecium, and the Enterobacterales-carbapenemase axis constituted the principal thematic cores, whereas conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) and whole-genome sequencing were the dominant platforms. Overall, the field has evolved from pathogen detection into an AMR-centered translational domain encompassing resistance prediction, genomic epidemiology, surveillance, and clinical decision support. Diagnostic development, stewardship, and surveillance depend on hybrid workflows coupling rapid marker-targeted assays with genome-based characterization, delivering actionable resistance within clinically meaningful timeframes, and extending coverage to underrepresented pathogens and platforms.

Humans