Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Multi-gene panel testing”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Genomic Landscape of 6597 Hong Kong HBOC Patients: Implications for Beyond-BRCA Multi-Gene Panel Testing and Cancer Surveillance.

Breast cancer remains highly prevalent, where the lifetime risk before age 75 is one in 13. However, known genetic factors were only identified in 14.7% of cases in our Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry. Our current local policy for genetic testing does not cover the detection of beyond BRCA1/2. Here we highlight the clinical value of extending testing to beyond BRCA susceptibility genes for improved prevention, diagnosis, and management. We recruited 6597 hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) patients from our registry based on family history and clinical criteria. Germline mutations were identified by multi-gene sequencing analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical-pathological characteristics of BRCA and beyond BRCA carriers were compared and the real-world management and surveillance services adopted in Hong Kong were highlighted. In this multi-gene hereditary cancer cohort, germline mutations were identified in 10.9% of cases for BRCA1/2 and 3.5% for beyond BRCA susceptibility genes. These beyond BRCA mutations constitute a considerable proportion of actionable hereditary risk. Notably, PALB2 emerged as the most prevalent non-BRCA gene, followed by TP53, ATM, and BARD1. New cancers or recurrences were detected during their surveillance; the overall pick up rates were 8.3% (PALB2), 29.4% (TP53), 33.3% (PTEN) and 5.6% (BARD1). This study provides the first comprehensive characterization of the beyond BRCA germline landscape in a Hong Kong hereditary cancer cohort and highlights the current need for implementing multi-gene sequencing analysis and surveillance services for HBOC patients, establishing the predominant non-BRCA drivers and providing a robust empirical basis for expanding public genetic screening frameworks.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Cancer spectrum in Mexican patients with the CHEK2 p.(Leu236Pro) variant: a retrospective study.

This study aimed to characterize, for the first time, the cancer spectrum associated with the most frequent pathogenic CHEK2 variant-NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.707T > C p.(Leu236Pro)-in Mexican individuals. Although this variant is frequently detected through multi-gene panel testing, limited data on its associated cancer risks complicates genetic counseling and surveillance strategies. We retrospectively analyzed 5,759 patients who underwent multi-gene panel testing between August 2015 and August 2024 due to suspected hereditary cancer syndromes. Among them, 58 CHEK2 p.(Leu236Pro) carriers with confirmed cancer diagnoses were identified. Geographical clustering was observed, with 81% of patients originating from central Mexico, suggesting a possible founder effect. Ten distinct clinical indications for genetic testing were identified, with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome being the most common (74.1%). The mean age at first diagnosis among carriers was 43.8 ± 12 years, and 61.1% of them reported a family history of cancer in first- or second-degree relatives. A second or third primary cancer occurred in 20.7% of cases. Tumors were identified in 12 anatomical sites. Breast cancer predominated (67.6%, including one male case), followed by ovarian (8.1%), prostate (6.7%), gastric (4.1%), thyroid (2.7%), and endometrial (2.7%) cancers. Lymphoma, lung, sacrococcygeal bone, colorectal, and non-melanoma skin cancers each occurred in a single patient. Significant risk association was identified only for breast, ovarian, and gastric cancers. These results highlight the need for personalized surveillance, especially for breast cancer. Incorporating CHEK2 p.(Leu236Pro) into clinical decision-making tools may enhance risk assessment in the Mexican population, but larger studies are needed to refine risk estimates and to clarify the possible founder effect.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

A novel insertion/deletion in APC promotor 1B is associated with both gastric and colon polyposis.

Pathogenic variants in the APC gene are classically associated with autosomal dominant familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), characterized by tens-to-thousands of colonic adenomatous polyps and a high-penetrance predisposition to colorectal cancer. More recently, specific PVs in the YY1 binding motif of APC promoter 1B have been associated with autosomal dominant gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS), characterized by tens-to-thousands of fundic gland polyps and a predisposition to gastric cancer but which are only rarely associated with features consistent with FAP. Although management guidelines currently treat FAP and GAPPS as mutually exclusive conditions, the extent of phenotypic overlap is not well-characterized. Here, we present a multi-clinic and -laboratory collaboration reporting a previously undescribed APC promoter 1B insertion/deletion likely pathogenic variant in a family with mixed GAPPS and FAP phenotype. The family proband is a female of unspecified white ancestry. She was diagnosed with GAPPS at age 30 and, after developing gastric cancer at age 39, underwent curative gastrectomy. She is now 61 with a cumulative history of between 50 and 100 colon adenomas and recently completed subtotal colectomy. Her multi-gene panel testing in 2022 demonstrated a likely pathogenic insertion/deletion (indel) within the APC promoter 1B YY1 binding motif (APC c.-192_-191delATinsTAGCAAGGG). Review of a four-generation pedigree revealed the ages of gastric cancer presentation in the family ranged from 39-60's, with advanced gastric polyposis and prophylactic gastrectomy as early as ages 11 and 13 in the proband's daughter and nephew, respectively. Six of 10 (60%) family members known or presumed to carry the APC likely pathogenic variant underwent colectomy or hemicolectomy due to colon polyposis. The youngest known carrier in the family is a 12-year-old female, and the oldest living carrier is the proband's brother, age 66. A novel APC indel causes concomitant GAPPS and FAP presentations in this previously unreported large kindred. Mixed gastric and colon phenotypes have been rarely described in GAPPS families and the ages of presentation of gastric polyposis are strikingly young in the current family with prophylactic gastrectomies completed as early as age 11 and 13. These ages are significantly younger than the 15 years of age at which national guidelines currently recommend initiation of EGD for screening in GAPPS. Although the mechanism for this combined GAPPS-FAP phenotype is unclear, patients in this family and those with similar APC promoter 1B variants should be offered both gastric and colon cancer risk management.

Adult↗
PubMed2026

Hereditary cancer: Germline testing practices across ERN GENTURIS member countries.

Germline genetic testing practices for hereditary cancer vary across the European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS) member countries. We surveyed experts in genetic testing from 20 EU member countries and Norway to assess multi-gene panel usage, availability of genome-wide sequencing, first-tier testing approaches, implementation of polygenic risk scores, and the roles of non-genetic healthcare professionals. National experts and members of the ERN GENTURIS completed a structured questionnaire covering founder germline pathogenic variants (gPV) testing, panel testing for common genetic tumour risk syndromes, use of whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing, polygenic risk score implementation, use of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour samples, laboratory accreditation, and the clinical roles of physicians, genetic counselors and nurses. Significant inter-country heterogeneity was observed. Most countries rely on next-generation sequencing (NGS) multi-gene panels. Founder gPV testing is first-line in a few high-prevalence populations (e.g., BRCA1/2 founders). All 21 countries offer NGS panel tests for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and ≥19 countries do so for colorectal and prostate cancers. However, NGS panel size and gene composition exhibit substantial variability. WES is available in 12 countries on a routine basis. Most countries implemented genetic testing on stored tumour tissue from deceased patients. In all countries, clinical geneticists can order germline genetic tests, and in 9 countries, any physician can do so. These findings show differences in accessibility to germline genetic testing of hereditary cancer in Europe. We propose EU-wide guidance via pathways, standards of care, and sharing of best practices to further optimize access to hereditary cancer genetic molecular diagnostics.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Characterizing trends in clinical genetic testing: A single-center analysis of EHR data from 1.8 million patients over two decades.

A lack of structural data in electronic health records (EHRs) makes assessing the impact of genetic testing on clinical practice challenging. We extracted clinical genetic tests from the EHRs of more than 1.8 million patients seen at Vanderbilt University Medical Center from 2002 to 2022. With these data, we quantified the use of clinical genetic testing in healthcare and described how testing patterns and results changed over time. We assessed trends in types of genetic tests, tracked usage across medical specialties, and introduced a new measure, the genetically attributable fraction (GAF), to quantify the proportion of observed phenotypes attributable to a genetic diagnosis over time. We identified 104,392 tests and 19,032 molecularly confirmed diagnoses. The proportion of patients with genetic testing in their EHRs increased from 1.0% in 2002 to 6.1% in 2022, and testing became more comprehensive with the growing use of multi-gene panels. The number of unique diseases diagnosed with genetic testing increased from 51 in 2002 to 509 in 2022, and there was a rise in the number of variants of uncertain significance. The phenome-wide GAF for 6,505,620 diagnoses made in 2022 was 0.46%, and the GAF was greater than 5% for 74 phenotypes, including pancreatic insufficiency (67%), chorea (64%), atrial septal defect (24%), microcephaly (17%), paraganglioma (17%), and ovarian cancer (6.8%). Our study provides a comprehensive quantification of the increasing role of genetic testing at a major academic medical institution and demonstrates its growing utility in explaining the observed medical phenome.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Identification of candidate variants in plasma associated with early versus late disease progression under anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies, have significantly improved outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). However, substantial heterogeneity exists in clinical benefit, with some patients exhibiting early progression (EP) and others late progression (LP). To date, no biomarkers of EP versus LP disease have been implemented in clinical practice. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis represents a minimally invasive strategy for identifying such biomarkers. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated the performance of the TruSight Oncology 500 ctDNA (TSO500 ctDNA) panel and explored its feasibility to identify candidate variants associated with early and late disease progression under anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: Baseline ctDNA from eight mNSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab was extracted and sequenced using the TSO500 ctDNA assay, a 523-gene targeted next-generation sequencing panel. Patients were classified according to their response as LP or EP. Variant calling was performed using the DRAGEN Bio-IT platform, and variants were annotated and clinically interpreted using the Clinical Genomics Workspace (CGW; PierianDx) according to Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP)/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Performance of ctDNA variants was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and multi-gene models were assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation with penalized logistic regression. RESULTS: All patients harbored detectable variants, including SNVs (100%), MNVs (87.5%), deletions (75%), and insertions (62.5%). Tier I variants were identified in 37.5% of patients, while all cases showed tier II and multiple tier III alterations. TP53 variants were associated with poorer outcomes under anti-PD-1 therapy. Individual gene alterations in TP53, ERBB3, SMC1A or LATS1 showed moderate discriminatory performance between LP and EP patients; however, combination of mutated genes improved apparent discrimination. Notably, specific two-gene combinations (SMC1A + LATS1 or ERBB3 + LATS1) showed the highest discriminatory performance between LP and EP patients in this exploratory cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility and analytical performance of the TSO500 ctDNA panel and provides hypothesis-generating evidence that plasma gene variants may be useful to evaluate early versus late disease progression in patients with mNSCLC receiving immunotherapy.

TruSight Oncology 500↗
PubMed2017

Reanalysis of BRCA1/2 negative high risk ovarian cancer patients reveals novel germline risk loci and insights into missing heritability.

While up to 25% of ovarian cancer (OVCA) cases are thought to be due to inherited factors, the majority of genetic risk remains unexplained. To address this gap, we sought to identify previously undescribed OVCA risk variants through the whole exome sequencing (WES) and candidate gene analysis of 48 women with ovarian cancer and selected for high risk of genetic inheritance, yet negative for any known pathogenic variants in either BRCA1 or BRCA2. In silico SNP analysis was employed to identify suspect variants followed by validation using Sanger DNA sequencing. We identified five pathogenic variants in our sample, four of which are in two genes featured on current multi-gene panels; (RAD51D, ATM). In addition, we found a pathogenic FANCM variant (R1931*) which has been recently implicated in familial breast cancer risk. Numerous rare and predicted to be damaging variants of unknown significance were detected in genes on current commercial testing panels, most prominently in ATM (n = 6) and PALB2 (n = 5). The BRCA2 variant p.K3326*, resulting in a 93 amino acid truncation, was overrepresented in our sample (odds ratio = 4.95, p = 0.01) and coexisted in the germline of these women with other deleterious variants, suggesting a possible role as a modifier of genetic penetrance. Furthermore, we detected loss of function variants in non-panel genes involved in OVCA relevant pathways; DNA repair and cell cycle control, including CHEK1, TP53I3, REC8, HMMR, RAD52, RAD1, POLK, POLQ, and MCM4. In summary, our study implicates novel risk loci as well as highlights the clinical utility for retesting BRCA1/2 negative OVCA patients by genomic sequencing and analysis of genes in relevant pathways.

Adult↗