Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Moxifloxacin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

[National multicenter study of the in vitro activity of moxifloxacin against respiratory tract pathogens. Spanish Study Group on Moxifloxacin].

The activity of moxifloxacin, a novel 8-methoxyquinolone, was evaluated against 1,218 respiratory pathogens isolated in nine Spanish hospitals and was compared with ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, erythromycin and clarithromycin. Moxifloxacin exhibited an excellent in vitro activity against most tested isolates with MIC90 values of 0.25 mg/l for Streptococcus pneumoniae and viridans group streptococci; 0.12 mg/l for Streptococcus pyogenes; 0.25 mg/l for Streptococcus agalactiae; 0.06 and 4 mg/l for methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus, respectively; 0.06 mg/l for Haemophilus influenzae and 0.12 mg/l for Moraxella catarrhalis. Moxifloxacin susceptibility rates were not affected by penicillin resistance in S. pneumoniae and S. viridans, by the betalactamase production in H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis or by macrolide resistance. Moxifloxacin was twice as active as sparfloxacin and four to sixteen times more active than ciprofloxacin against Gram-positive isolates. Sparfloxacin and ciprofloxacin were slightly more active than moxifloxacin when tested against H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis isolates. The microbiological data obtained confirm that moxifloxacin is a promising antimicrobial agent for treating respiratory tract infections.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2005

In vitro and in vivo potency of moxifloxacin and moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5%, a new topical fluoroquinolone.

Fluoroquinolones are a class of synthetic antibacterial agents that were approved for ocular therapy in 1991 and have become popular therapy for the treatment and prevention of various ocular infections. These agents are synthetic, broad-spectrum, rapidly bactericidal, and have good penetration into ocular tissues. Their main mechanism of action is the inhibition of bacterial enzymes needed for bacterial DNA synthesis. However, antibiotic resistance occurred swiftly to the earlier fluoroquinolones and better fluoroquinolones were needed. The fourth-generation fluoroquinolones, such as moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin, have enhanced activity against gram-positive bacteria while retaining potent activity against most gram-negative bacteria. These fourth-generation fluoroquinolones have improved penetration into the anterior chamber and have also demonstrated increased in vivo efficacy in several animal models of ocular infections. In addition, topical ophthalmic antibiotic products can deliver antibiotic concentrations directly to the eye that are thousands of times higher than their MICs. This article reviews published data describing the in vitro potency of moxifloxacin and its in vivo activity for treating and preventing experimental ocular infections.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2001

The efficacy and safety of two oral moxifloxacin regimens compared to oral clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

An international multi-centre, randomized, prospective, double-blind study compared oral moxifloxacin (200 mg or 400 mg once daily for 10 days) with oral clarithromycin (500 mg, twice daily for 10 days) in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The clinical success rate in the evaluable population at the primary efficacy assessment, 3-5 days after the end of study treatment, was 93.9% in patients treated with 200 mg moxifloxacin; 94.4%, with 400 mg moxifloxacin; and 94.3%, with clarithromycin. Clinical success rates were maintained at follow-up, 21-28 days after the end of treatment: 90.7% (200 mg moxifloxacin), 92.8% (400 mg moxifloxacin) and 92.2% (clarithromycin). The 95% confidence intervals indicated that all three treatment regimens were equally effective in treating CAP. At follow-up, the 400 mg moxifloxacin dose had a slightly higher observed cure rate than the 200 mg moxifloxacin dose, but this was not statistically significant. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (42%), Haemophilus influenzae (19%), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (10%), Moraxella catarrhalis (6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5%) and Staphylococcus aureus (4%). The bacteriological success rate (eradication and presumed eradication) was 72.5% (29/40) for 200 mg moxifloxacin, 78.7% (37/47) for 400 mg moxifloxacin and 70.7% (29/41) for clarithromycin. The adverse event profile was comparable between the three treatment groups. Most adverse events, possibly or probably related to the study drug, were generally mild or moderate in severity and mostly related to the digestive system: diarrhoea, nausea and abdominal pain in 200 mg moxifloxacin patients; diarrhoea, liver function abnormalities and nausea in 400 mg moxifloxacin patients and liver function abnormalities, diarrhoea, nausea and taste perversion in clarithromycin patients. Study drugs were discontinued because of adverse events in 7/229 (3%) patients treated with 200 mg moxifloxacin, 11/224 (5%) with moxifloxacin 400 mg and 11/222 (5%) with clarithromycin. In all assessments, moxifloxacin was at least as effective clinically, and as well tolerated as clarithromycin in the treatment of CAP. Bacteriological success rates in moxifloxacin-treated patients were greater than those of clarithromycin. Moxifloxacin, given once daily, is free of many drug-drug interactions and requires no dosage adjustments in most renal hepatic deficient patients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Experimental pneumococcal pleural empyema model: the effect of moxifloxacin.

OBJECTIVES: Pleural empyema is a serious complication of pneumonia, the optimal therapy of which is still unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of moxifloxacin in this condition. METHODS: Pleural empyema was induced in rabbits by intrapleural administration of Pasteurella multocida (10(5-6) cfu) or turpentine (0.3 mL) followed 3 h later by instillation of Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 49619) (10(6) cfu) into the pleural cavity. The MICs of moxifloxacin for S. pneumoniae and P. multocida were 0.4 and 0.05 mg/L, respectively. Starting 30 h following S. pneumoniae challenge intramuscular moxifloxacin 12.5 and 25 mg/kg was administered x 4 (every 12 h). Pleural empyema fluid samples were obtained for bacterial count at 12 h intervals following the first three moxifloxacin administrations. Moxifloxacin levels in pleural empyema and serum samples were obtained at 0, 30, 60, 120, 240, 360 and 480 min and 12 h after the 4th dose and determined by bioassay. RESULTS: In control animals, S. pneumoniae (and P. multocida) persisted in the pleural empyema. S. pneumoniae also persisted in the pleural empyema fluid when moxifloxacin was administered at 12.5 mg/kg (x4 administrations). Mean serum and pleural empyema peak moxifloxacin levels (following the 25 mg/kg dose) were 7.6 (+/-3.2) and 4.8 (+/-2.5) mg/L, respectively. Pleural empyema peak moxifloxacin concentration lagged 1 h after serum moxifloxacin. Serum and pleural empyema half-lives were approximately 1.5 and approximately 6 h, respectively. Serum AUC(1-12) was 29.4 (+/-6.8) mg.h/L and serum area under the inhibitory concentration curve (AUIC) was 73.5 mg.h/L. Pleural empyema AUC(1-12) was 34.3 (+/-11.7) mg/L and pleural empyema AUIC was 85.8 mg.h/L. S. pneumoniae was eradicated from pleural empyema following a single dose of moxifloxacin 25 mg/kg in 52% of the animals and in 96% following four doses. Moxifloxacin was also effective in eradication of P. multocida. The rate of pleural empyema sterilization was related to moxifloxacin serum AUIC (r = 0.82) as well as serum peak moxifloxacin level (r = 0.84), but not to pleural empyema AUIC (r = 0.19) or pleural empyema peak levels. The results were similar for both methods of induction of pleural empyema. CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin appears to penetrate well into experimental pleural empyema and effectively sterilize it from S. pneumoniae. Sterilization of S. pneumoniae is related to serum AUIC rather than to moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics in pleural empyema.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Moxifloxacin (BAY12-8039), a new 8-methoxyquinolone, is active in a mouse model of tuberculosis.

Moxifloxacin (BAY12-8039) is a new 8-methoxyquinolone shown to be active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro. We tested moxifloxacin for activity in mice against M. tuberculosis CSU93, a highly virulent, recently isolated clinical strain. The MIC of moxifloxacin for the CSU93 strain was 0.25 microg/ml. The serum moxifloxacin concentration after oral administration in mice peaked within 0.25 h, reaching 7.8 microg/ml with doses of 100 mg/kg of body weight; the maximum concentration and the analysis of the area under the concentration-time curve revealed dose dependency. When mice were infected with a sublethal inoculum of mycobacteria and then treated with moxifloxacin at 100 mg/kg per day for 8 weeks, the log10 CFU counts in the organs of treated mice were significantly lower than those for the control group (0.6 +/- 0.2 versus 5.6 +/- 0. 3 in the lungs and 1.5 +/- 0.7 versus 4.9 +/- 0.5 in the spleens, respectively; P < 0.001 in both organs). The effectiveness of moxifloxacin monotherapy was comparable to that seen in mice receiving isoniazid alone. Combination therapy with moxifloxacin plus isoniazid was superior to that with moxifloxacin or with isoniazid alone in reducing bacillary counts in the organs studied. Using a sensitive broth-passage subculture method, we demonstrated that 8 weeks of treatment with moxifloxacin (100 mg/kg per day) or with moxifloxacin plus isoniazid (100 mg/kg and 25 mg/kg, respectively, per day) sterilized the lungs in seven of eight and in eight of eight mice, respectively. Among surviving bacilli isolated from animals infected with a high-titer inoculum and treated for 7 weeks with low-dose moxifloxacin (20 mg/kg per day), breakthrough resistance to moxifloxacin was not observed. These results indicate that moxifloxacin is highly effective in reducing M. tuberculosis infection in mice and has activity comparable to that of isoniazid. Combination therapy with moxifloxacin and isoniazid was highly effective, suggesting that moxifloxacin may be useful in multiple-drug regimens for human tuberculosis.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Moxifloxacin and glucose homeostasis: a pooled-analysis of the evidence from clinical and postmarketing studies.

BACKGROUND: Recently, clinical data has emerged suggesting that the fluoroquinolone, gatifloxacin, can affect glucose homeostosis through an unknown mechanism. In order to explore the potential effects of moxifloxacin on glucose metabolism in humans, a pooled analysis of phase II/III clinical trials and postmarketing studies was performed and compared with results from an investigation in laboratory animals. METHODS: A pooled analysis of 30 (26 controlled, 4 uncontrolled) oral and two intravenous/oral prospective, controlled phase II/III moxifloxacin studies was performed to evaluate the frequency of hyper- and hypoglycaemic episodes and glucose-related adverse events and adverse reactions (i.e. those considered to be drug related) versus comparator antimicrobials (penicillins, cephalosporins, macrolides, doxycycline, fluoroquinolones). Similar evaluations were conducted on data pooled from five postmarketing surveillance studies. In addition, potential effects of supratherapeutic doses of moxifloxacin on blood glucose and plasma insulin levels in fed and fasted rats were assessed in comparison with those of gatifloxacin, levofloxacin and glibenclamide (glyburide). RESULTS: The phase II/III database was comprised of 14,731 patients (8474 moxifloxacin, 6257 comparator antimicrobial). There were no drug-related hypoglycaemic adverse events reported for moxifloxacin in either the oral or intravenous/oral database. Two drug-related hypoglycaemic adverse events were reported in the oral comparator group, both following administration of levofloxacin and both of mild severity; one drug-related hypoglycaemic adverse event was reported in the intravenous/oral comparator group after trovafloxacin administration. Drug-related hyperglycaemic adverse events were reported in seven (<0.1%) moxifloxacin and 1 (<0.1%) comparator-treated patients in the oral study database, none of these cases were considered serious and six of the seven moxifloxacin cases were graded as mild and required no countermeasures. There were no cases of drug-related hyperglycaemic events in any patient enrolled in the intravenous/oral studies. Coadministration of oral antidiabetic drugs with moxifloxacin or comparator antimicrobials did not change the rate of blood glucose increases or decreases in diabetic patients. Data from five moxifloxacin postmarketing studies (46 130 subjects) reported no episodes of hypoglycaemia and two non-drug-related hyperglycaemic episodes. Data from animal studies revealed that supratherapeutic doses of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin did not affect blood glucose or plasma insulin levels in both fed and fasted rats, whereas gatifloxacin decreased both blood glucose and plasma insulin in a dose-dependent manner in fed rats only. The reference compound glibenclamide increased insulin and decreased glucose levels as expected. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperglycaemic or hypoglycaemic adverse reactions were reported rarely in studies with oral or sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin, and incidence was comparable in moxifloxacin and comparator groups. Changes in glucose metabolism were also similar in diabetic patients treated with moxifloxacin compared with those patients without diabetes mellitus. This comprehensive analysis of the datapool for moxifloxacin phase II/III clinical trials and postmarketing studies suggests that moxifloxacin administration has no clinically relevant effect on blood glucose homeostasis.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Safety profile of oral and intravenous moxifloxacin: cumulative data from clinical trials and postmarketing studies.

BACKGROUND: The established safety profile of the fluoroquinolones has been disrupted in the past decade by the detection of low-frequency but potentially serious adverse events that have led to the license suspension, voluntary withdrawal, or restricted use of specific members of the class. Moxifloxacin is a broad-spectrum, advanced-generation fluoroquinolone that has potent activity against respiratory tract infections in adults in both oral and IV formulations. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article was to provide an overview of the cumulative safety data on both oral and IV moxifloxacin, including data from the most recent clinical trials and postmarketing studies. METHODS: Data from clinical trials of moxifloxacin were captured from an electronic database maintained by the manufacturer. Safety data for oral moxifloxacin were obtained from 30 Phase II/III comparator studies (n = 7,368 moxifloxacin, n = 5,687 comparators), 1 Phase IV study (n = 18,374), and 4 postmarketing observational studies (n = 27,756). Safety data for IV moxifloxacin were obtained from 2 Phase III comparator studies (n = 550 maxifloxacin, n = 579 comparators). In addition, pharmacokinetic data were reviewed. RESULTS: In Phase II/III comparator studies, gastrointestinal complaints were the most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with both formulations of moxifloxacin, with nausea occurring in 7.1% and 3.1% of patients receiving oral and IV moxifloxacin, respectively, and diarrhea occurring in 5.2% and 6.2% of patients. Discontinuation rates due to ADRs with oral and IV moxifloxacin were 2.7% and 6.0%, and mortality rates were 0.3% and 4.0%. Similar rates of withdrawal and mortality were observed in the comparator groups. There was no evidence that moxifloxacin caused disturbances in glucose metabolism in patients with or without diabetes mellitus, and there was no evidence of an increased risk for cardiovascular adverse events. Pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that dose adjustment of moxifloxacin does not appear to be necessary in elderly patients, those with renal dysfunction, or those with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. The pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin have not been studied in patients with severe hepatic insufficiency. Moxifloxacin does not interact with a number of commonly prescribed drugs, although its absorption is decreased by concomitant administration of iron and cationic antacids. CONCLUSIONS: Based on evidence from >7000 patients in clinical trials and >46,000 patients in postmarketing studies, moxifloxacin is generally well tolerated. Its lack of significant drug interactions in target groups makes it an option in diabetic patients or the elderly, as well as in those with renal impairment.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Retrospective analysis of the safety profile of oral moxifloxacin in elderly patients enrolled in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: As aging is associated with physiological changes, including renal and hepatic insufficiency, and a higher risk of drug interactions, special attention needs to be directed towards the safety of medications in the elderly. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the safety of oral moxifloxacin in elderly patients who were enrolled in clinical trials and to compare these results to those of other commonly used antibacterials. METHODS: Safety data from 27 prospective, randomised, comparative phase II/III trials of oral moxifloxacin included in the Bayer clinical trial database were pooled and analysed by age group (<65 years of age, 65-74 years of age, > or = 75 years of age) and by treatment group (moxifloxacin vs comparator). The primary endpoints included rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (all adverse events regardless of causality), drug-related adverse events, drug-related serious adverse events, deaths and premature discontinuations because of a treatment-emergent adverse event. A treatment by age group interaction test was used to determine if the comparison between moxifloxacin and the comparator group in the incidence rates of any treatment-emergent or drug-related adverse events were affected by increasing age. RESULTS: Of the 12 231 patients who had valid safety data, 6270 had been treated with oral moxifloxacin and 5961 with a comparator antibacterial. The most frequently used comparators were cefuroxime and clarithromycin. Most patients (n = 9671) were <65 years of age (4939 moxifloxacin, 4732 comparator); 1636 patients were 65-74 years of age (842 moxifloxacin, 794 comparator); and 924 patients were > or = 75 years of age (489 moxifloxacin, 435 comparator). The treatment by age group interaction test revealed that the comparison of drug-related adverse event rates between the moxifloxacin and comparator group were not affected by increasing age (p = 0.43). Rates of premature termination between the moxifloxacin and comparator treatment groups also did not increase with age (p = 0.552). No arrhythmias related to corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation were reported following oral moxifloxacin or comparator treatment in this large group of young and elderly patients. Overall, the number of deaths was similar between the treatment groups (17 moxifloxacin, 19 comparator). CONCLUSIONS: Drug-related adverse event rates associated with oral moxifloxacin or the comparator therapy used in these studies did not significantly increase with advancing age. This pooled analysis suggests that oral moxifloxacin can be safely used in elderly patients with characteristics consistent with those enrolled into the clinical trials.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Effects of enteral feeding on the oral bioavailability of moxifloxacin in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Moxifloxacin is a new generation fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent used worldwide. In clinical practice in intensive care units, moxifloxacin may be frequently administered through a nasogastric feeding tube. In the absence of an oral liquid formulation and since the multivalent cations contained in enteral feeds may potentially impair absorption of moxifloxacin administered via this route, we studied the effect of concomitant enteral feeding on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of moxifloxacin administered as a crushed tablet through the nasogastric tube. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled, nonblinded, three-way crossover study. Twelve young healthy volunteers (nine females and three males) aged 20-42 years were included in the study. Each participant received three separate treatment regimens in a randomised fashion: an intact moxifloxacin 400 mg tablet (regimen A, reference treatment), a crushed moxifloxacin 400 mg tablet as a suspension through a nasogastric tube with water (regimen B) and a crushed moxifloxacin 400 mg tablet as a suspension through a nasogastric tube with enteral feeding (regimen C). A washout period of 1-week followed each treatment. Concentrations of moxifloxacin in serum were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. Additionally, the primary parameters indicative for changes in absorption (area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity [AUC(infinity)] and peak serum concentration [C(max)]), were tested for bioequivalence, assuming log-normally distributed data using ANOVA. RESULTS: All moxifloxacin treatment regimens were well tolerated. The AUC(infinity) was slightly, but not statistically significantly, decreased in treatments with regimens B and C. AUC(infinity) (geometric means 39.6 [regimen A] vs 36.1 [regimen B] vs 36.1 mg.h/L [regimen C] and point estimates 91% for B : A and C : A) indicated bioequivalence of the treatments. Bioequivalence criteria of AUC(infinity) and C(max) were met upon retrospective statistical analysis. Likewise C(max) after moxifloxacin administration through nasogastric tube with water (regimen B) and with tube feed (regimen C) were slightly decreased (geometric means 3.20 [regimen A] vs 3.05 [regimen B] vs 2.83 mg/L [regimen C]; point estimates 88% for B : A, and 95% for C : A). They were within the range seen in other studies conducted with oral administration of the drug. No statistically significant differences were observed in time to reach C(max) (t(max); median 1.75 [regimen A] vs 1.00 [regimen B] vs 1.75 hours [regimen C]). Thus, the rate of absorption of moxifloxacin was not affected by administration through a nasogastric tube. This route of ingestion seems to be associated with a slight loss of bioavailability independent of the carrier medium used (water vs enteral feed); no clinically relevant interaction with the multivalent cations contained in the enteral feed was observed, indicating that moxifloxacin and enteral nutrition can be administered concomitantly. CONCLUSION: There was no clinically relevant effect of enteral feeding on the pharmacokinetics of oral moxifloxacin in healthy volunteers. This result has to be evaluated in patients, particularly those from the intensive care unit, who are characterised by severe infectious and/or concomitant diseases that might influence absorption of moxifloxacin.

Absorption↗
PubMed2000

Short-course moxifloxacin therapy for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The Bronchitis Study Group.

Chronic bronchitis is common among adults and infectious exacerbations contribute considerably to morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin to clarithromycin for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB) using a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial. Between November 21, 1996 and April 7, 1998, 936 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) were enrolled at 56 centers across the United States of which 491 (52%) had ABECB (i.e. pretherapy pathogen). Patients were randomized to either oral moxifloxacin 400 mg administer once daily, for either 5 or 10 days, or clarithromycin 500 mg bid for 10 days. For the purpose of study blinding, the patients taking moxifloxacin received placebo to maintain uniform dosing. The main outcome measures were bacteriological response at the end of therapy (post-therapy days 0-6) and follow-up (7-17 days post-therapy) visits, as well as overall clinical response, clinical response at the end of therapy and clinical response at follow-up. Two patient populations were analyzed: efficacy-valid (i.e., those with a pretherapy pathogen) and intent-to-treat (i.e., all subjects that took drug). In 420 efficacy valid patients with a pretherapy organism, overall clinical resolution was 89% for 5 days moxifloxacin vs. 91% for 10 day moxifloxacin vs. 91% for 10 day clarithromycin. Bacteriological eradication rates at the end of therapy were 94% and 95% for 5-day moxifloxacin and 10-day moxifloxacin, respectively, and 91% for the clarithromycin group. Eradication rates at follow-up were 89% and 91% for 5-day moxifloxacin and 10-day moxifloxacin respectively, and 85% for the clarithromycin group. Among 926 intent-to-treat patients (312 5-day moxifloxacin, 302 10-day moxifloxacin and 312 clarithromycin), drug-related events were reported for 26%, 30% and 35%, respectively. Moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily, as a 5 or 10 day regimen, was found to be clinically and bacteriologically equivalent to 10 day clarithromycin for the treatment of ABECB. Given its favorable safety and tolerability profile, moxifloxacin administered once daily for 5 days may be as effective and a more convenient treatment than a standard course of clarithromycin for patients with ABECB.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Frequencies and mechanisms of resistance to moxifloxacin in nosocomial isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the in vitro activity of moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin against 226 nosocomial isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii from 44 hospitals in the UK. METHODS: MICs of ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin were determined by Etest. PCR analysis was used to detect chromosomal mutations in the gyrA and parC genes. Isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin and susceptible to moxifloxacin were examined for the ability to generate spontaneous moxifloxacin-resistant isolates. RESULTS: Of 226 isolates, 49.1% were resistant to ciprofloxacin and 39.4% were moxifloxacin-resistant according to BSAC criteria. Approximately 20% of isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin remained susceptible to moxifloxacin. A GyrA mutation at Ser-83 was found in all ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates. Single mutations in both the gyrA and parC genes at codons Ser-83 and Ser-80, respectively, were found in ciprofloxacin- and moxifloxacin-resistant isolates. Isolates that were ciprofloxacin-resistant but moxifloxacin-susceptible generated spontaneous moxifloxacin-resistant mutants when grown on medium containing up to 8x their initial MIC. However, these mutants were not stable and none displayed high-level moxifloxacin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin retained in vitro activity against some ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical A. baumannii isolates. Mutations in both gyrA and parC were necessary for resistance to moxifloxacin in most isolates of A. baumannii.

Acinetobacter Infections↗
PubMed1998

Evaluation of moxifloxacin, a new 8-methoxyquinolone, for treatment of meningitis caused by a penicillin-resistant pneumococcus in rabbits.

Moxifloxacin is a new 8-methoxyquinolone with high activity against gram-positive bacteria, including penicillin-resistant pneumococci. In an experimental meningitis model, we studied the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in infected and uninfected rabbits and evaluated the antibiotic efficacies of moxifloxacin, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin against a penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strain (penicillin, ceftriaxone, vancomycin, and moxifloxacin MICs were 1, 0.5, 0.5, and 0.125 microgram/ml, respectively). Moxifloxacin entered cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) readily, with peak values within 15 to 30 min after bolus intravenous infusion and with a mean percent penetration into normal and purulent CSF of approximately 50 and 80%, respectively. The bactericidal effect of moxifloxacin was concentration dependent, and regrowth was seen only when the concentration of moxifloxacin in CSF was below the minimal bactericidal concentration. All antibiotic-treated groups (moxifloxacin given in two doses of 40 mg/kg of body weight, moxifloxacin in two 20-mg/kg doses, ceftriaxone in one 125-mg/kg dose, and vancomycin in two 20-mg/kg doses) had significantly higher reductions in CSF bacterial concentration than the untreated group (P < 0.05). Moxifloxacin was as effective as vancomycin and ceftriaxone in reducing bacterial counts at all time points tested (3, 5, 10, and 24 h). Moreover, moxifloxacin given in two 40-mg/kg doses resulted in a significantly higher reduction in CSF bacterial concentration (in log10 CFU per milliliter) than vancomycin within 3 h after the start of antibiotic treatment (3.49 [2.94 to 4.78] versus 2.50 [0.30 to 3.05]; P < 0.05). These results indicate that moxifloxacin could be useful in the treatment of meningitis, including penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Evaluation of the influence of antacids and H2 antagonists on the absorption of moxifloxacin after oral administration of a 400mg dose to healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of concomitant administration of the antacid Maalox 70 or the histamine H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine on the bioavailability of moxifloxacin. DESIGN: These were nonblinded, randomised, crossover studies performed in healthy volunteers. PARTICIPANTS: 24 healthy males aged 22 to 39 years (study 1; n = 12) and 24 to 43 years (study 2; n = 12) were included in these studies. METHODS: In study 1, 12 participants received ranitidine 150mg twice daily during a 3-day pretreatment phase and 1 tablet of ranitidine together with a single 400mg dose of moxifloxacin on the profile day. In study 2, 12 participants received a single 400mg dose of moxifloxacin alone (treatment A), simultaneously with Maalox 70 10ml (treatment B), or with Maalox 70 10ml given 4 hours before (treatment C) or 2 hours after (treatment D) the fluoroquinolone. In treatments B, C and D, administration of the antacid (10ml, 1 hour after each meal) was continued for 2 days. Plasma and urine samples were obtained for determination of the pharmacokinetic parameters of moxifloxacin. RESULTS: Coadministration of moxifloxacin with ranitidine showed lack of interaction for area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinfinity) [35.5 versus 34.3 mg/L x h with versus without ranitidine; relative bioavailability 103%, 90% confidence interval (CI) 97.7 to 109.3%] and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) [2.98 versus 2.76 mg/L with versus without ranitidine; ratio 107.9%, 90% CI 90.5 to 128.6%]. When moxifloxacin was given simultaneously with Maalox 70, AUCinfinity ( 14.7 mg/L x h) and Cmax (1.00 mg/L) were reduced by approximately 60%. When the antacid was given 4 hours before or 2 hours after the fluoroquinolone, AUCinfinity values (28.0 and 26.7 versus 34.3 mg/L x h) were moderately reduced (by <27%), terminal elimination half-life values declined by approximately 24% (9.4 and 9.3 versus 12.3 hours) compared with moxifloxacin alone and Cmax values were almost unchanged (2.55 and 2.38 versus 2.57 mg/L). The mean bioavailabilities corrected for the elimination rate constants (lambdaz) were 101% (antacid given 4 hours before moxifloxacin) and 98% (antacid given 2 hours after moxifloxacin), indicating that Maalox 70 may interfere with the gastrointestinal recirculation of moxifloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: The bioavailability of moxifloxacin is not affected by concurrent administration of ranitidine. Absorption of moxifloxacin is impaired by concomitant administration of aluminium- and magnesium-containing antacids and administration of these agents should be staggered. An interval of 2 hours before or 4 hours after taking the antacid ensures that the effect of the interaction is not clinically relevant.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Effect of a single oral dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg and 800 mg) on ventricular repolarization in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Moxifloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone. In vitro studies have suggested that it could prolong ventricular repolarization. The main objective of this study was to measure the actual effect of single oral doses of moxifloxacin on QT interval duration in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Nine men and 9 women participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Each participant received single oral doses (400 mg and 800 mg) of moxifloxacin or placebo. At the time of expected moxifloxacin maximum concentration, several electrocardiographic recordings were obtained at rest and during the course of a submaximal exercise test. QT interval and the corresponding RR interval value were measured within a wide range of RR intervals in each subject. RESULTS: ANOVA showed that both moxifloxacin doses increased mean QT intervals compared with placebo. The mean QT interval duration at RR = 1000 ms was 379 +/- 24 ms during placebo, 394 +/- 33 ms during moxifloxacin 400 mg (P < .05), and 396 +/- 28 ms during moxifloxacin 800 mg (P < .05). Moxifloxacin-induced QT interval prolongation remained significant at all tested heart rates. The increase in QT interval duration relative to placebo remained between 2.3% +/- 2.8% and 4.5% + 3.8% across the range of RR intervals tested. CONCLUSION: Moxifloxacin prolongs QT interval duration. The amplitude of this effect is small, and the risk of moxifloxacin-induced torsades de pointes is expected to be minimal when the drug is administered at the recommended dose of 400 mg/d. However, moxifloxacin should not be used in patients with predisposing factors of torsades de pointes such as electrolyte disturbances and bradycardia or during coadministration of proarrhythmic drugs.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Evaluation of the clinical microbiology profile of moxifloxacin.

Moxifloxacin is a new broad-spectrum antibacterial agent for treatment of respiratory tract infection of pathogens, including the major pathogens isolated in respiratory tract infections. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of moxifloxacin are: excellent bioavailability, long half-life, and superior tissue penetration. Consequently, the 90% minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC(90)) values exhibited by moxifloxacin are generally lower than the concentrations of moxifloxacin found in circulation and in pulmonary tissues after a standard 400-mg dose given for up to 30 h. The relationship between moxifloxacin MIC(90) values and clinical response was investigated. The results of 13 clinical trials, performed in 30 countries between 1997 and 1998 and comprising 2618 patients treated with moxifloxacin or a comparator drug, were reviewed. Overall, 94% clinical success and 95% bacterial eradication was observed with moxifloxacin. These results were equivalent or superior to results seen with the comparator drugs. Clinical response rates and bacterial eradication rates with moxifloxacin were not significantly affected by bacterial resistance to other antibiotics (i.e., penicillin, clarithromycin, or amoxicillin). The majority (89%-97%) of the different bacterial strains with MICs for moxifloxacin < or =2 mg/L were successfully eradicated. In conclusion, moxifloxacin has potent in vivo bactericidal activity, and pathogen sensitivity to moxifloxacin is in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration and European suggested breakpoint values.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2000

Moxifloxacin: a review of its clinical potential in the management of community-acquired respiratory tract infections.

UNLABELLED: Moxifloxacin is an extended-spectrum fluoroquinolone which has improved coverage against gram-positive cocci and atypical pathogens compared with older fluoroquinolone agents, while retaining good activity against gram-negative bacteria. The antibacterial spectrum of moxifloxacin includes all major upper and lower respiratory tract pathogens; it is one of the most active fluoroquinolones against pneumococci, including penicillin- and macrolide-resistant strains. In in vitro studies, emergence of bacterial resistance was less common with moxifloxacin than with some other fluoroquinolones, but this requires confirmation in large-scale clinical studies. As with other fluoroquinolones, moxifloxacin achieves good penetration into respiratory tissues and fluids. It shows a low potential for drug interactions and dosage adjustment is not required for patients of advanced age or those with renal or mild hepatic impairment. The efficacy of oral moxifloxacin has been demonstrated in large, well-designed clinical trials in patients with community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or acute sinusitis. Moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily achieved bacteriological and clinical success rates of approximately 90% or higher. It was as effective as, or more effective than, comparators including clarithromycin, cefuroxime axetil and high dose amoxicillin in these trials. The most commonly reported adverse events in patients receiving moxifloxacin are gastrointestinal disturbances. Moxifloxacin is also associated with QTc prolongation in some patients; there are, as yet, no data concerning the possible clinical sequelae of this effect in high-risk patients. Moxifloxacin has a low propensity for causing phototoxic reactions relative to other fluoroquinolones, and animal data suggest that it has a low potential for causing excitatory CNS and hepatotoxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: As an extended-spectrum fluoroquinolone, moxifloxacin offers the benefits of excellent activity against pneumococci, once daily administration and a low propensity for drug interactions. Although studies are needed regarding its tolerability in at-risk patients with QT interval prolongation, available data suggest that moxifloxacin is likely to become a first-line therapy option for the treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections, particularly in areas where drug-resistant S. pneumoniae or H. influenzae are common.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2006

Mechanism of hERG K+ channel blockade by the fluoroquinolone antibiotic moxifloxacin.

The fluoroquinolone antibiotic moxifloxacin has been associated with the acquired long QT syndrome and is used as a positive control in the evaluation of the QT-interval prolonging potential of new drugs. In common with other QT-prolonging agents, moxifloxacin is known to inhibit the hERG potassium K+ channel, but at present there is little mechanistic information available on this action. This study was conducted in order to characterise the inhibition of hERG current (I(hERG)) by moxifloxacin, and to determine the role in drug binding of the S6 aromatic amino-acid residues Tyr652 and Phe656. hERG currents were studied using whole-cell patch clamp (at room temperature and at 35-37 degrees C) in an HEK293 cell line stably expressing hERG channels. Moxifloxacin reversibly inhibited currents in a dose-dependent manner. We investigated the effects of different voltage commands to elicit hERG currents on moxifloxacin potency. Using a 'step-ramp' protocol, the IC50 was 65 microM at room temperature and 29 microM at 35 degrees C. When a ventricular action potential waveform was used to elicit currents, the IC50 was 114 microM. Block of hERG by moxifloxacin was found to be voltage-dependent, occurred rapidly and was independent of stimulation frequency. Mutagenesis of the S6 helix residue Phe656 to Ala failed to eliminate or reduce the moxifloxacin-mediated block whereas mutation of Tyr652 to Ala reduced moxifloxacin block by approximately 66%. Our data demonstrate that moxifloxacin blocks the hERG channel with a preference for the activated channel state. The Tyr652 but not Phe656 S6 residue is involved in moxifloxacin block of hERG, concordant with an interaction in the channel inner cavity.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2002

Mono, dual and triple moxifloxacin-based therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND: Moxifloxacin is a broad spectrum fluoroquinolone with single daily administration, currently used, above all, for respiratory tract infections. AIM: To compare the efficacy of different 1-week moxifloxacin-based Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. METHODS: One hundred and twenty H. pylori-positive subjects were randomized to receive moxifloxacin (400 mg/day), moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) and lansoprazole (30 mg/day) or moxifloxacin (400 mg/day), lansoprazole (30 mg/day) and clarithromycin (500 mg b.d.). H. pylori status was reassessed 6 weeks after the end of therapy, and both intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen of the 120 patients completed the study. H. pylori eradication was achieved in 22.5% of patients treated with moxifloxacin, in 33.3% of subjects treated with moxifloxacin and lansoprazole and in 90% of patients treated with moxifloxacin, clarithromycin and lansoprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Mono and dual moxifloxacin-based therapies are not acceptable for H. pylori eradication; conversely, moxifloxacin-based triple therapy may be considered as a new, effective, first-line therapy option.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗