Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Mouth Breathing”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1991

[Orthodontic consequences of mouth-breathing].

Mouth breathing habits are frequently associated with orthodontic problems. In the nasal area, the lack of ventilation leads to an underdevelopment of the maxilla: lateral and sometimes anterior cross bites appear. In the buccal area, the want of maintaining the mouth opened induces a new postural position of the mandible which alters the pattern of growth of the mandible ("long face"). The functional context of the buccal praxis is also altered: low or protruded tongue, deviant swallowing, troubles of speech.... The treatment of this pathological context needs a pluridisciplinary approach where the otorhinolaryngologist, the dentist, the orthodontist and the speech pathologist have to play an important role. In the orthodontic fields, we have to carry out an orthopedic treatment (rapid maxillary expansion, facial masks,...) to normalize the growth of the maxilla before the orthodontic treatment.

Child↗
PubMed1989

Lack of correlation between mouth-breathing and bite force.

The correlation between mouth-breathing and bite force was studied in 81 children, 7 to 16 years old. Mouth-breathing was diagnosed on the basis of the subject history, the rhinomanometrically determined nasal airflow and the size of the airway measured on the profile cephalogram. The maximum bite force was measured at the first molars. In addition, the facial morphology was analysed on profile cephalograms. Both mouth-breathing and bite force were associated with the facial morphology but there was no association between mouth-breathing and bite force. It was concluded that the long-face morphology characteristic of mouth-breathing children is not due to weak masticatory muscles.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Skeletal and occlusal characteristics in mouth-breathing pre-school children.

This study verified the influence of chronic mouth breathing on dentofacial growth and developmental in pre-school children. The study evaluated 73 children, both sexes, ranging from 3 to 6 years of age. After the otorhinolaryngological breathing diagnosis, 44 mouth-breathing children and 29 nasal-breathing children were compared according to facial and occlusal characteristics. The skeletal pattern measurements SN.GoGn, BaN.PtGn, PP.PM, Ar-Go, S-Go indicated a tendency to mouth-breathing children presenting a dolicofacial pattern. According to occlusal characteristics, only the intermolar distance showed a significant correlation with a narrow maxillary arch in mouth-breathing subjects. Based on the results of this study, mouth-breathing can influence craniofacial and occlusal development early in childhood.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2005

Enhancement of indomethacin-induced gastric damage by mouth breathing in rabbits.

Previous studies have reported that mouth breathing is associated with respiratory acidosis. Regarding to the reports that renal elimination of weak acids such as indomethacin is pH dependent, this study was carried out to evaluate the role of mouth breathing on plasma level of indomethacin and indomethacin-induced gastric damage in rabbits. Mouth breathing was induced by surgical ligation of nostrils under general anesthesia. One day after the operation, arterial blood samples were collected for acid-base balance analysis and indomethacin was administered intraperitoneally in a single dose of 40mg/kg. The animals were killed 4h after indomethacin administration and blood samples were collected for spectrofluorometric determination of indomethacin in plasma. The results showed that indomethacin induces more severe gastric damage in nose obstructed rabbits compared with sham and unoperated (UNOP) animals. Acid-base analysis revealed a respiratory acidosis in nose obstructed rabbits and indomethacin level of plasma was significantly higher in nose obstructed animals in comparison with control rabbits. The study shows that mouth breathing can increase the potentiation of indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal damage that may be due to higher level of indomethacin in plasma of nose obstructed animals.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2006

Electromyographic activity evaluation and comparison of the orbicularis oris (lower fascicle) and mentalis muscles in predominantly nose- or mouth-breathing subjects.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the orbicularis oris--lower fascicle (LOO) muscle and the mentalis muscle (MT)--in predominantly nose-breathing (PNB) and mouth-breathing (PMB) subjects. METHODS: Thirty-four subjects, 22 PNB and 12 PMB, with Class II Division 1 malocclusions were evaluated in 2001 (T1) and again in 2004 (T2), 2 years 5 months later. The age ranges of the sample were 11 years to 14 years 11 months at T1, and 13 years 4 months to 16 years 6 months at T2. EMG activity was recorded with bipolar surface electrodes at rest and during 12 movements; data were processed and normalized by the EMG highest value. The Student t test and the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test were used to compare the mean values and the variables between the observation times. RESULTS: Greater EMG activity of the MT was observed in the PMB group at rest and swallowing at T1 and T2. At T2, increased EMG activity of the LOO at blowing and pronunciation of the phoneme \b\ was observed as well as a greater increment of EMG activity of this muscle at blowing, pronunciation of the phoneme \m\, and chewing in the PMB group. In addition, greater EMG activity of the MT at chewing in the PMB group was observed at T2. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that mouth breathing influences EMG activity of the LOO and MT muscles.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Cephalometric assessment of the mandibular growth pattern in mouth-breathing children.

OBJECTIVE: At the present time, it is generally accepted that chronic mouth breathing influences craniofacial growth and development. The objective of this study was to determine the position of the jaw, its growth direction and morphology, and the facial proportions of children with two different etiological factors of mouth breathing, at different age groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups of mouth breathing children were analyzed by cephalometry. Two groups, ages ranging from 3 to 6 and 7 to 10 years, with respiratory obstruction due to isolated adenoid hypertrophy (AH), and two groups, ages ranging from 3 to 6 and 7 to 10 years, due to adenotonsillar hypertrophy (ATH). RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between mouth breathing children caused either by AH or by ATH in any of the age groups. Only the linear Ar-Go measurement was significantly larger in children with ATH with 7 years or more. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the influence of mouth breathing on mandibular growth is poorly related to the etiological factors analyzed. The single difference observed was the lower posterior facial height in children of 7 years of age or more, which was higher in those with ATH than in those with AH.

Adenoids↗
PubMed1989

Otitis media with effusion and habitual mouth breathing in Dutch preschool children.

Habitual mouth breathing (HMB) is defined as the habit of in- and exhaling (part of) the air through the mouth, when an individual is at rest and the nose is sufficiently free. It is postulated that HMB is a risk factor for otitis media with effusion (OME) in preschool children. The results are presented of a prospective cohort study on 253 3-year-old children, free from OME, with a follow-up period of 3 months, to determine the role of HMB in the etiology of OME. The risk ratio for OME of habitual mouth breathers, compared to nose breathers, was found to be 2.4 (95% confidence interval (C.I.): 0.99-5.70). Moreover, there is a clear and significant linear trend in the proportion of OME in 3 breathing categories: nose breathing, intermediate and mouth breathing. This relation remains after correction for confounding. It is concluded that HMB is a risk factor for OME. It is estimated that about 20% of the incidence of OME is caused by HMB. The high incidence of OME means that HMB carries a great deal of impact. Suggestions are made for the prevention and treatment of HMB.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1989

Effect of respiratory rate, respiratory depth, and open versus closed mouth breathing on sublingual temperature.

The effect of open mouth breathing, tachypnea, and hyperpnea, either alone or in combination, on sublingual and tympanic membrane temperature in healthy adults was investigated. Seventy-eight subjects maintained randomly assigned breathing patterns for 15 minutes. Temperatures were monitored immediately prior to and for 5 minutes following the breathing protocol. The only statistically significant finding (p less than .01) was a lower sublingual temperature with open mouth breathing. No significant changes in tympanic membrane temperature were seen.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prevalence and factors related to mouth breathing in school children at the Santo Amaro project-Recife, 2005.

AIM: To determine the prevalence of mouth breathing children at the santo amaro project/ esef/ upe, and study their main facial and behavior alterations. STUDY DESIGN: transversal study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: there were 150 children in the sample, with ages ranging from 8 to 10 years. Data was collected by means of a questionnaire and clinical examinations. As for their breathing assessment, two tests were carried out: test 1- breath steam against a mirror; and test 2 -water remains in the mouth with lips closed for 3 minutes. RESULTS: mouth breathing prevalence was of 53.3%. There was no significant difference between gender, age and type of breathing. Facial alterations were:incomplete lip closure ( 58.8%X5,7%), fallen eyes ( 40.0%X1.4%), High palate ( 38.8%X2.9%), Anterior open bite ( 60.0% Versus 30.0%), Hypotonic lips ( 3.8%X0.0%), Circles under the eyes (97.5% Versus 77.1%). CONCLUSION: high mouth breathing prevalence without significant statistical difference between genders,age and type of mouth breathing. There was no association between behavior characteristics and type of breathing. There were significant differences between physical traits and breathing pattern.

Brazil↗
PubMed1984

Effect of an intranasally administered corticosteroid (budesonide) on nasal obstruction, mouth breathing, and asthma.

The effect of intranasally administered corticosteroid (budesonide) on nasal symptoms, mode of respiration (nasal versus mouth breathing), and asthma was investigated in 37 asthmatic children who were mouth breathers because of chronic nasal obstruction. After a 2-wk run-in period, the children were allocated randomly to 4 wk of intranasal therapy with either budesonide (400 micrograms/day) or placebo spray. A double-blind, parallel design was used. Diaries for peak expiratory flow, asthma, and rhinitis symptom scores and degree of mouth breathing were recorded at home. Nasal eosinophilia, nasal airway resistance at a flow of 0.2 L/s (NAR0.2), and lung function at rest and after exercise challenge were assessed at the clinic immediately before and at end of the 4-wk treatment. Budesonide, when compared with placebo, significantly decreased nasal obstruction (p less than 0.05), secretion (p less than 0.01), and eosinophilia (p less than 0.02), as well as NAR0.2 (p less than 0.05) and mouth breathing (p less than 0.01). The improvement in nasal obstruction correlated closely to the changes in mouth breathing (r = 0.80, n = 17, p less than 0.001). Furthermore, intranasally administered budesonide resulted in less exercise-induced asthma (EIA) (p less than 0.02) and decreased cough and asthma severity significantly. Pulmonary mechanics were only marginally improved. The present study showed that intranasally administered budesonide is effective in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. An attenuation of EIA and a tendency to less asthma after budesonide therapy suggest a decrease in bronchial reactivity, but the results gave no clear evidence of an association between nasal airway function and asthma.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed2006

Oral hygiene practices, periodontal conditions, dentition status and self-reported bad mouth breath among young mothers, Tanzania.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the oral hygiene practices, periodontal conditions, dentition status and self-reported bad mouth breath (S-BMB) among young mothers. STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. A total of 302 postpartum mothers, aged 14-44 years, were interviewed on oral hygiene practices and S-BMB using structured questionnaire. Oral hygiene, dentition and periodontal status were assessed using the Community Periodontal Index probe and gingival recessions (GR) using Williams Periodontal probe. RESULTS: Tooth brushing practice was 99%; tongue brushing (95%), plastic toothbrush users (96%), chewing stick (1%), wooden toothpicks (76%), dental floss (<1%); and toothpaste (93%). The prevalence of plaque and gingival bleeding on probing was 100%, gum bleeding during tooth brushing (33%), calculus (99%), probing periodontal pocket depth (PPD) 4-5 mm (27%), PPD 6+ mm (3%), GR 1+ mm (27%) and tooth decay (55%). The prevalence of S-BMB was 14%; the S-BMB had higher mean number of sites with plaque compared to the no S-BMB group (P=0.04). Factors associated with S-BMB were gum bleeding on tooth brushing (OR=2.4) and PPD 6+ mm (OR=5.4). CONCLUSION: Self-reported bad mouth breath is a cause of concern among young mothers, and associated significant factors were gum bleeding on tooth brushing and deep periodontal pockets of 6+ mm. Further research involving clinical diagnosis of bad mouth breath and intervention through oral health promotion and periodontal therapy are recommended. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides baseline information on oral health status and the complaint on bad mouth breath which necessitates in the future need for objective assessment, diagnosis and management of bad mouth breath for enhanced social and professional interaction without embarrassment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Relative acute toxicities of hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, and hydrogen bromide in nose- and pseudo-mouth-breathing rats.

Hydrogen fluoride (HF), hydrogen bromide (HBr), and hydrogen chloride (HCl) gases can be generated during the pyrolysis of a variety of materials and they may be encountered in numerous industrial settings. Although injury to the respiratory tract has been characterized following the inhalation of halide gases via the nasal route, essentially no experimental information is currently available about their injurious effects when they are inhaled during mouth breathing. In this study, we simulated mouth breathing by using a pseudo-mouth-breathing (MB) rat model in order to: (1) characterize the profiles and magnitudes of respiratory tract injury that result from the acute inhalation of relatively high mass concentrations of the above halides when the upper airway is bypassed, and (2) assess the relative toxicities of HF, HBr, and HCl when inhaled by way of either the nasal or the oral pathways. Tracheal tubes connected to mouthpieces were inserted into temporarily anesthetized rats, i.e., mouth breathers. Awake rats were placed into whole body flow plethysmographs for pulmonary ventilation studies while they were exposed either to air or to 1300 ppm of HF, HBr, or HCl for 30 min. Similarly pretreated rats were also exposed but without the mouthpiece, i.e., nose breathers (NB). The animals were euthanized 24 hr after exposure for histopathologic analyses of their upper and lower respiratory tracts and for lung gravimetric measurements. Tissue injury following NB exposure to the halides was confined to the nasal region, e.g., epithelial and submucosal necrosis, accumulations of inflammatory cells, exudates, and the extravasation of erythrocytes. MB exposure caused higher mortality rates and major tissue disruption in the trachea, including epithelial, submucosal, glandular, and cartilage necrosis, and accumulations of inflammatory cells and exudates. More peripheral lung damage was manifested by lung gravimetric increases and histopathologic changes primarily in the larger conducting airways. The results of this study demonstrate that the injurious response profiles to HF, HBr, and HCl markedly differ as a function of the route by which they are inhaled. Furthermore, examinations of the magnitudes of injury caused by exposure to the halides during nose or mouth breathing in conjunction with animal ventilatory data obtained during exposure to the halides suggest that HF, HBr, and HCl are quantitatively similar in their toxic effects in the respiratory tract.

Acids↗
PubMed2002

Electromyographic analysis of trapezius and sternocleidomastoideus muscles during nasal and oral inspiration in nasal- and mouth-breathing children.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate sternocleidomastoideus (SCM) and trapezius (superior fibers) muscle activity patterns in mouth-breathing children, and to compare them with nasal-breathing children. Forty-six children, of both sexes, ranging from 8 to 12 years old, were evaluated through electromyography. The selected children were divided into two groups; Group I, was made up of 26 mouth-breathing children and Group II of 20 nasal-breathing children. Electromyographic recordings were obtained through surface electrodes in the SCM and trapezius muscles, bilaterally, during oral and nasal inspiration. Root-mean-square (RMS) data expressed in microvolts (microV), were analyzed using the Kruskall-Wallis statistical test. From the results obtained, we concluded that there was a significant difference in the muscle activity between the groups, with higher activity during nasal inspiration in the mouth-breathing group. During oral inspiration, there was no significant difference between groups. Within the groups, only the mouth-breathing group showed higher activity during nasal inspiration.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2004

Prevalence of oral malodor and the relationship with habitual mouth breathing in children.

The prevalence of oral malodor and association of habitual mouth breathing with oral malodor were investigated in children residing in rural areas. One hundred and nineteen children participated in this study. A sulfide monitor and organoleptic method were used to evaluate oral malodor. About 8% of children had a sulfide level in mouth air above the socially acceptable limit (75 ppb). Habitual mouth breathing was a factor contributing to oral malodor. Oral malodor was not significantly correlated with plaque index, history of caries or frequency of toothbrushing.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1989

A comparison between anamnestic, rhinomanometric and radiological methods of diagnosing mouth-breathing.

Three methods of evaluating the mode of breathing were applied in 119 children aged 7-15 years who were to start orthodontic treatment for various malocclusions. The three methods were: the history, rhinomanometric recording of the nasal airflow and determination of the size of the airway on profile and frontal cephalograms. The variables describing the mode of breathing were correlated with the facial morphology and the natural position of the head and the cervical spine as recorded with profile cephalometry. There were no correlations between the results of the evaluation of the mode of breathing obtained with the three methods. Nor were there any correlations between these and the position of the head or the cervical spine. A history of mouth-breathing, the rhinomanometrically determined airflow through the nose and the size of the airway on the profile cephalogram were, however, correlated with the long face morphology characteristic of mouth-breathing. A diagnosis of mouth-breathing should be based on different supplementary methods, the history and the size of the airway on the profile cephalogram being at least as valuable as the rhinomanometric recordina.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Nasal admixture during mouth breathing in awake normal subjects.

We tested the flow-impeding properties of the nasopharynx in 27 healthy subjects with normal nasal resistance (mean +/- SD: 2.45 +/- 1.92 cmH20.l-1 X s). While the subjects inspired and expired deliberately through a rubber mouth-piece, a tight-fitting nose-mask was supplied with 100% O2 from a filled 30-1 rubber bag. Recording instantaneous FEO2 at the mouth was a sensitive indicator of whether nasal flow was present during the preceding inspiration. On a theoretical basis, we are describing a method of calculating the mean percentage of nasal admixture during inspiration. Fluctuations in FEO2 in relation to time revealed varying nasal flow in some individuals. The mean nasal admixture differed considerably between all subjects (mean +/- SD: 20.9 +/- 16.5%; range: 1-70%), showing no correlation to nasal resistance. Five of 27 subjects with a history of habitual mouth breathing had a significantly lower nasal admixture (2.5 +/- 1.7% vs 25.1 +/- 15.4%; p less than 0.005), with no statistical difference in nasal resistance. Present data indicate that upper airway patency is variable in normals during voluntary mouth breathing. We suggest that habitual mouth breathing with absence of nasal obstruction may be associated with velopharyngeal narrowing.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

[Role of the nose in inspiration in mouth breathing: quantitative determination by analysis of expiratory gases].

It is widely accepted that increased nasal resistance plays a major role in habitual mouth breathing. We investigated oronasal air flow distribution during voluntary mouth breathing in subjects without nasal obstruction. To determine whether nasal air flow contributes to total inspiratory flow, we administered 100% O2 by a nasal mask while the lips were kept apart by a mouth piece. Expired O2 concentrations measured at the mouth were a sensitive indicator of nasal admixture during inspiration. Theoretical considerations predict that mixed expired pO2 from two consecutive steady state periods should allow calculation of nasal admixture. Measurements made on 22 healthy volunteers revealed a very variable degree of nasal contribution to inspiratory air flow (mean +/- SD, 25 +/- 15%, range 3-70%). There was no correlation between this proportion and anthropometric data, smoking habits, nasal resistance, or presence of rhinitis. We suggest that changes in the position of the soft palate, tongue, and/or pharyngeal wall associated with respiration are mainly responsible for the within and between subject variation observed in this study. This explanation is consistent with recent experimental findings on the pharyngeal dilating muscles.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

[Efficacy of nasal O2 administration during mouth breathing].

27 subjects with healthy lungs received during conscious mouth breathing of room air simultaneously also nasally applied O2. The mean O2 concentration of the expiratory air at the mouth was a measure for the effective inspiratory oxygen concentration. Application through a nasal mask at 4 l/min O2 flow proved only slightly superior to the airtight nose frame (25.2 vs 23.6 per cent by volume O2), whereas the highest concentration was achieved by mask and reservoir (35.3 vol.%; 2P less than 0.001). The five habitual mouth breathers of the subject group did not show any O2 uptake through the nose in any of the experiments, the mean nasal share of the inspiration being calculated at 2.5% against 25% for the other subjects (2P less than 0.001). The interindividual differences proved independent of nose resistance and are ascribed to changing active positioning of the soft palate. This mechanism must be taken into consideration when assessing the arterial blood gases in oronasal respiration.

Adult↗