Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Monitoring, Immunologic”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Immunological monitoring as a guide to the management of transplant recipients.

Immunological monitoring assays are of current value in the management of transplant recipients. These assays allow the pre-transplant quantitation of both donor-recipient histocompatibility and recipient "responder status." In addition, these assays allow the individualization of immunosuppression, permitting a more uniform and effective immunosuppression in the difficult early post-transplant period. Individualized modulation of recipient immune reactivity avoids the documented pitfalls of conventional stereotyped suppression and permits better abrogation of acute rejection responses and lesser rates of serious infections consequent to excessive immune suppression. Immunological monitoring of long-surviving recipients permits early detection of immune reactivity which often culminates in clinical chronic rejection, as well as permits the quantitation of immune facilitory mechanisms (reduced capability to generate anti-donor cytotoxic T cells and/or cellular suppressor mechanisms) that indicate an immune milieu conductive to long-term graft survival. The primary limitations to the more widespread use of immunological monitoring assays at present are the need for more consensual validations of the utility of these assays in different laboratories, more standardization and better controls of techniques, and improvement in the technology of the assays to permit rapid, reproducible, and accurate results with a lesser expenditure of laboratory time and money and greater economy in demands for recipient blood and donor tissue. Finally, immunological monitoring assays are notable for the great promise they offer in terms of immunobiological probes to dissect mechanisms of rejection, mechanisms of graft facilitation, mechanisms of action of immunosuppressive agents, and mechanisms by which empirical technology of recipient pre-treatment may condition the host to better acceptance of an incompatible graft.

Animals↗

Immunologic monitoring in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by progressive defects in humoral- and cell-mediated immunity. These defects are manifested as a propensity to develop infections with encapsulated bacteria, and less frequently, with gram-negative enterics. In addition, reactivation of viruses such as herpesvirus is not uncommon. Treatment of the disease further exacerbates immunosuppression by depleting immune effectors and broadening the spectrum of potentially offending pathogens. Risk of infection can potentially be reduced by administration of intravenous immunoglobulin and use of prophylactic antibiotics for individuals who are at high risk. Current work focuses on development of cellular and cytokine therapy to facilitate immune reconstitution in patients with CLL, thereby reducing morbidity and mortality and potentially improving survival.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Immunological monitoring in cyclosporine-treated patients.

The immunosuppressive action of cyclosporine (CsA) in vivo is thought to primarily involve its inhibitory effect on lymphokine production by T lymphocytes. Most efforts to assess immunosuppression in CsA-treated patients have concentrated on measuring some aspect of activated T cell function. These have included monitoring of lymphocyte subsets and the appearance of activated T cell markers, assaying the production of lymphokines and the direct measurement of lymphokines in serum and urine, and most recently measurement of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (SIL2R). Using a new microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) in a preliminary study of 12 CsA-treated renal transplant recipients, we found significant increases in serum SIL2R levels in patients with rejection and we conclude that MEIA may have some use in the monitoring of CsA-treated patients.

Cyclosporins↗

Current status of immunological monitoring in the renal allograft recipient.

With the appropriate combined use of different immune monitoring techniques, it is possible to derive sensitive diagnostic parameters for the transplant surgeon. However, the core biopsy or cytological examination of the graft continues to represent the gold standard for evaluating the specificity and sensitivity of these methods. With the development of newer monoclonal antibodies and a better understanding of the impact of immune processes on the behavior of various activation linked, T cell associated surface antigens, one may be able to secure further valuable information, with enhanced diagnostic and prognostic accuracy.

ABO Blood-Group System↗

Immunological monitoring during therapeutic vaccination as a prerequisite for the design of new effective therapies: induction of a vaccine-specific CD4+ T-cell proliferative response in chronic hepatitis B carriers.

We characterized the anti-viral T-cell response in 22 chronically infected patients, who participated in a European multi-center randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind study therapeutic vaccination trial with pre-S1, pre-S2 and S antigenic components of the hepatitis B virus (HBV). It induced a significant HBsAg-specific T-cell proliferation and the production of Th2-cytokines (i.e. IL-5). A specific induction of Th1-lymphokines was not detectable although this has been demonstrated in this study in response to the nucleocapsid protein (HBcAg). Further analysis indicated that this approach does not activate HBV-specific CD8+ T-lymphocytes as detected by ELISPOT-assay. Our results might explain why a specific therapeutic vaccine, although safe and well-tolerated is not always able to break tolerance leading to the clearance of the hepatitis B virus.

Adult↗

Comparative evaluation of 'TaqMan' RT-PCR and RT-PCR ELISA for immunological monitoring of renal transplant recipients.

By sequentially monitoring cytokine gene expression (using RT-PCR ELISA technology) in peripheral blood cells of renal transplant recipients in the early post-operatively period we have shown that expression patterns correlate with clinical events, namely acute allograft rejection. This strategy may have the potential of predicting acute rejection prior to clinical detection. Unfortunately, the technique used was time consuming and only semi-quantitative and, therefore, not suitable for clinical application. In this study, we have sought to confirm the results of the early work using a real time quantitative RT-PCR technique ('TaqMan'), which may be applicable in the clinical laboratory. 'TaqMan' primers and probes were designed for Interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-10 using Primer Express software. Cytokine gene expression for both cytokines was re-measured in stored cDNA samples from 27 non-rejectors and 14 patients experiencing an episode of biopsy proven acute rejection. Compared to pre-transplant levels, IL-4 gene expression fell significantly on post-operative days 2 and 7 before returning to baseline values by day 14 in the non-rejectors. In the rejectors, the initial significant fall was again seen, but with an earlier return to pre-transplant levels at the time of rejection diagnosis. This was followed by a further significant fall in levels 48 h after the initiation of anti-rejection therapy. These different patterns for rejectors and non-rejectors were seen using both techniques. For IL-10, gene expression increased significantly following transplantation throughout the study period when compared to baseline values. This pattern was seen using both techniques. In the rejectors, there were different patterns seen depending on the technique used. When using RT-PCR ELISA, the initial rise was again seen followed by a return to baseline values at the time of rejection diagnosis followed by a further significant rise in gene expression after the start of anti-rejection treatment. The pattern resembled those of the non-rejectors when expression was measured using 'TaqMan'. This study has confirmed that sequential monitoring of cytokine gene expression, measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, detects significant changes that correlate with clinical events in renal transplant recipients, including acute rejection, although not all changes detected with RT-PCR ELISA were confirmed. Therefore, real time quantitative RT-PCR technology may be useful in monitoring the immunological status of these patients in the early post-operative period.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay↗

Immunologic monitoring of cancer vaccine therapy: results of a workshop sponsored by the Society for Biological Therapy.

The Society for Biological Therapy held a Workshop last fall devoted to immune monitoring for cancer immunotherapy trials. Participants included members of the academic and pharmaceutical communities as well as the National Cancer Institute and the Food and Drug Administration. Discussion focused on the relative merits and appropriate use of various immune monitoring tools. Six breakout groups dealt with assays of T-cell function, serologic and proliferation assays to assess B cell and T helper cell activity, and enzyme-linked immunospot assay, tetramer, cytokine flow cytometry, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays of T-cell immunity. General conclusions included: (1) future vaccine studies should be designed to determine whether T-cell dysfunction (tumor-specific and nonspecific) correlated with clinical outcome; (2) tetramer-based assays yield quantitative but not functional data (3) enzyme-linked immunospot assays have the lowest limit of detection (4) cytokine flow cytometry have a higher limit of detection than enzyme-linked immunospot assay, but offer the advantages of speed and the ability to identify subsets of reactive cells; (5) antibody tests are simple and accurate and should be incorporated to a greater extent in monitoring plans; (6) proliferation assays are imprecise and should not be emphasized in future studies; (7) the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay is a promising research approach that is not ready for widespread application; and (8)there is a critical need to validate these assays as surrogates for vaccine potency and clinical effect. Current data and opinion support the use of a functional assay like the enzyme-linked immunospot assay or cytokine flow cytometry in combination with a quantitative assay like tetramers for immune monitoring. At present, assays appear to be most useful as measures of vaccine potency. Careful immune monitoring in association with larger scale clinical trials ultimately may enable the correlation of monitoring results with clinical benefit.

Animals↗

Immunologic monitoring of transplant rejection: correlation of in vitro assays with morphologic changes on transplant biopsy.

The assays of lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity (LMC), antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) were correlated with histopathologic criteria of refection in 35 transplant biopsies. A positive LMC was seen with 6/8 biopsies showing moderate to severe cellular rejection and in 8/17 with mild cellular rejection. Positive ADCC and/or CDC assays were associated with 14/14 biopsies containing rejection vasculitis. These results suggest that selected in vitro assays may be useful in monitoring the immunologic events occurring in the rejecting allograft.

Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity↗