Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Milnacipran”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Effect of pindolol and milnacipran versus milnacipran and placebo on plasma prolactin and adrenocorticotrophic hormone in depressed subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence that pindolol accelerates the action of antidepressants has been contradictory, and it is not clear why. The present study analyses the relationship between plasma prolactin (PRL) and ACTH levels and changes in relation to a milnacipran and pindolol combination versus milnacipran plus placebo. METHOD: Eighty depressed patients agreed to take part in a double-blind randomized trial of milnacipran plus pindolol or placebo. Fifty-eight of them agreed to also take measures of ACTH and PRL levels. ACTH and PRL plasma levels were estimated on days 0 and 42 of the 6-week study. Age, gender and time of blood collection were recorded for each individual. The Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) was used to measure the response to treatment. The patients were grouped into those with higher versus lower basal ACTH levels using the median of the sample (25 ng/l). RESULTS: There were statistical differences in MADRS scores between the treatment groups on day 42. There were correlations between PRL levels on days 0 and 42; age and PRL levels on day 0; time of the PRL sample and the PRL levels on day 0 and day 42; ACTH and PRL levels on day 42. Regression analysis of the 58 patients showed that on day 0, PRL levels were dependent on the ACTH plasma levels on day 0, the time of the collection of the blood sample and the age. On day 42, the PRL levels were dependent on the ACTH levels and the time of the blood collection but not on the age. Patients with lower baseline ACTH levels on day 0 displayed a better clinical outcome when taking the combination of milnacipran and pindolol as shown in the differences in MADRS on day 42. The same group of patients showed lower PRL levels on day 42. CONCLUSIONS: ACTH plasma levels at baseline or screening may help to predict the response to antidepressant treatment.

Adrenergic Agents↗
PubMed2000

Milnacipran efficacy in the prevention of recurrent depression: a 12-month placebo-controlled study. Milnacipran recurrence prevention study group.

To compare the efficacy and assess the tolerability of milnacipran 50mg p.o. b.i.d. to placebo in the prevention of recurrence in depressed patients who had responded an acute treatment and had remained in remission during a 4-month continuation phase. Remission criteria were: a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) (21-item) < or = 8, improvement or disappearance of the initial symptoms, and an assessment of 'very much improved' or 'much improved' on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Subscale: Global Improvement. Recurrence was defined by a major depressive episode according to DSM-III-R criteria and a minimum score of 18 on the HDRS, with the need to treat the recurrence. The primary analysis was the rate of recurrence as a function of time in the intent-to-treat population. Groups were compared using the Cox model. Absolute recurrence rates were 16.3% (17/104) in milnacipran-treated patients and 23.6% (26/110) in placebo-treated patients, with a significant difference in the reduction of recurrence as a function of time (Kaplan Meier Survival Analysis analysis, P < 0.05). There was no difference in tolerability between groups. This study demonstrates that milnacipran is effective with good tolerability in preventing recurrence in major depressive disorder over 1 year in patients with recurrent depression who responded to acute treatment with milnacipran and continued their response for 18 weeks.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Long-term efficacy and safety of milnacipran compared to clomipramine in patients with major depression.

Milnacipran is a new antidepressive drug, a combined noradrenaline/serotonin (NA/5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, which has been suggested to be as effective as and better tolerated than tricyclic antidepressants. Since long-term studies are lacking, we compared the efficacy, safety and tolerability of milnacipran and clomipramine in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study setting during 26 weeks of treatment in patients with major depression. A total of 107 patients were treated with either milnacipran (n=52) or clomipramine (n=55). Due to active treatment of duration less than 12 days in four patients and protocol deviation in one patient, in total 47 milnacipran-treated patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. Nine patients in the clomipramine group continued on active treatment for less than 12 days. Thus 46 clomipramine-treated patients were finally included in the efficacy analysis. After 1 week of dose escalation, there was a fixed dosage regimen of either milnacipran (200 mg daily) or clomipramine (150 mg daily) during weeks 2 to 10, followed by flexible dosing of milnacipran (100, 150 or 200 mg daily) or clomipramine (75, 100 or 150 mg daily) during weeks 11 to 26. A total of 53 patients (49%) completed the 26-week study period; 21% (11/52) of the patients in the milnacipran group and 38% (21/55) of the patients in the clomipramine group discontinued their medication prematurely due to adverse events, whereas 19% (10/52) of those on milnacipran and 7% (4/55) of those on clomipramine treatment withdrew due to either lack of efficacy or clinical deterioration. The mean change (+/-SD) in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score between the baseline and the last rating ranged from 23.7+/-3.1 to 12.0+/-9.5 in the milnacipran-treated patients and from 23.1+/-3.5 to 8.0+/-8.5 in the clomipramine-treated patients, revealing a significant difference in favour of clomipramine. In total 58% of the milnacipran-treated patients vs. 72% of the clomipramine-treated patients showed a > or = 50% reduction in their baseline HAMD scores and 45% vs. 63% had an HAMD score of < or = 7 at the last rating, respectively. Moreover, the time to the onset of the antidepressant action (defined as > or = 50% reduction of the baseline HAMD score) showed a significant difference in favour of clomipramine. In addition, clomipramine was significantly more efficacious in patients with a baseline HAMD score of > or = 24 as evidenced by the analysis of the HAMD score at week 6 and at the last rating. The Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale did not show significant differences between the treatment groups. The safety analysis did not reveal any differences of clinical significance in cardiovascular variables between the study drugs. Dry mouth was significantly less frequently reported by the milnacipran-treated patients during the early and later phases (weeks 6 to 26) of the study, while insomnia was more common in the milnacipran group during weeks 1 to 6. In conclusion, milnacipran appeared to be less effective than clomipramine in the long-term treatment of depression. The side-effects of the drugs differed to a certain extent, and milnacipran tended to be somewhat better tolerated than clomipramine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Efficacy and tolerability of milnacipran: an overview.

The relative benefits and risks of milnacipran, a novel antidepressant which selectively inhibits the reuptake of serotonin and noradrenaline, have been evaluated in comparative trials against tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). A total of 2462 patients with major depressive disorders have been investigated. At the optimal dose (50 mg twice a day), the efficacy of milnacipran was equivalent to that of the TCAs, with response rates of approximately 65% in both cases. Milnacipran was consistently effective against all of the principal elements of depression (anxiety, cognitive function, sleep and psychomotor retardation), and did not produce sedation or the emergence of suicidal thoughts. The Clinical Global Impression (CGI-3) score, a measure of the overall therapeutic impact of a treatment, was significantly higher with milnacipran than with TCAs (1.98 versus 1.84, p < 0.05). TCAs were associated with a higher frequency of adverse events than milnacipran, particularly with respect to anticholinergic-like effects; dysuria was the only adverse event occurring twice as frequently with milnacipran than with TCAs. Compared with TCAs, milnacipran was also associated with a lower incidence of cardiovascular adverse events. No haematological abnormalities occurred during treatment with milnacipran, and the incidence of abnormal liver function tests tended to be lower with milnacipran than with TCAs. In comparisons with SSRIs, milnacipran produced significantly higher response rates. The CGI-3 scores were significantly higher in milnacipran-treated patients (2.64 versus 2.32, p < 0.05). The adverse event profiles of the two treatments were similar, as was the incidence of abnormal liver function tests. These studies suggest that milnacipran offers clinical advantages over TCAs in terms of tolerability, and over SSRIs in terms of efficacy. In particular, the lack of cardiovascular adverse events appears to offer advantages in cases of deliberate overdose. To date, 15 such overdoses have occurred; none was fatal and each had a favourable outcome. The reproducible pharmacokinetic characteristics of milnacipran present further advantages over both groups of agents, due to lack of drug accumulation and a low risk of drug interactions.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗
PubMed1998

Milnacipran. A review of its use in depression.

UNLABELLED: Milnacipran is a cyclopropane derivative which acts by inhibiting noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake at presynaptic sites; no postsynaptic receptor activity has been demonstrated. It is most commonly administered at a dosage of 50 mg twice daily for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Improvement usually occurs within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, but some patients do respond sooner. Most studies which evaluated milnacipran were of short (4 to 8 weeks) duration and results were not published in full with rigorous peer review. Nonetheless, the drug is significantly more effective than placebo for the treatment of in- or outpatients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder. Limited data suggest that it may prevent relapse and be effective for long term use, although this requires confirmation. Milnacipran 200 mg/day is generally not significantly different from amitriptyline 150 mg/day in terms of onset and efficacy. However, when doses are titrated (not a requirement for milnacipran), milnacipran 50 or 100 mg/day has a slower onset than the tricyclic antidepressant. At a dosage of 100 mg/day for 4 to 12 weeks, milnacipran generally has similar efficacy to imipramine and clomipramine 150 mg/day, although milnacipran 50 to 150 mg/day had a faster onset of activity than imipramine 50 to 150 mg/day in Japanese patients. In a 6-month trial, milnacipran was less effective than clomipramine. Milnacipran 50 or 100 mg twice daily was as effective as fluoxetine 20 mg once daily or fluvoxamine 100 mg twice daily in 4- to 12-week studies. At a dosage of 50 then 100 mg daily it was also as effective as mianserin 30 then 60 mg daily in a 4-week study. However, when administered once daily (in the evening), milnacipran 100 mg/day was not as effective as fluoxetine 20 mg/day after 6 weeks. The drug is generally well tolerated, producing no more adverse events (including anticholinergic events) than placebo, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or mianserin and fewer adverse events than tricyclic antidepressants in clinical trials. However, dysuria has been reported in 7% of male patients receiving milnacipran. CONCLUSIONS: Data from predominantly short term trials suggest that milnacipran generally has similar efficacy to tricyclic antidepressants and SSRIs. Although further published data are required to confirm its efficacy, good tolerability profile and pharmacokinetic profile which suggests a low potential for drug interactions, milnacipran should be considered a promising agent for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Milnacipran, a new specific serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor.

Milnacipran is a new antidepressant which inhibits equipotently the reuptake of serotonin and noradrenaline both in vitro and in vivo with no effect on dopamine reuptake. Microdialysis studies have shown increased extracellular levels of both serotonin and noradrenaline after acute administration. Milnacipran is devoid of interactions at any known neurotransmitter receptor. In particular, and unlike tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), it has no activity at noradrenergic, muscarinic or histaminergic receptors. Contrary to TCAs, chronic administration of milnacipran does not modify beta-adrenoceptor binding or second messenger function. Milnacipran is active on various animal models of depression such as the forced swimming test in the mouse, learned helplessness in the rat and the olfactory bulbectomized rat model. Milnacipran has a high bioavailability, low plasma protein binding, and is largely eliminated in the urine as the parent drug or as a glucuronide. These features suggest that interactions with other drugs given concurrently are unlikely. Studies in patients with liver dysfunction and in the elderly suggest that dose adjustment is not necessary. In patients with renal impairment, decreased elimination of milnacipran is correlated to the degree of renal impairment allowing an easy dosage adjustment. An intermediate half-life of approximately 8 h is compatible with twice-daily administration. Clinical studies comparing milnacipran, placebo and other antidepressants provide evidence of its efficacy in moderate to severe depression in both hospitalized and outpatient settings. Meta-analyses of the original data of controlled trials comparing milnacipran with imipramine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) show that milnacipran provides antidepressant efficacy similar to that of TCAs and significantly superior to that of SSRIs. An analysis of a database of over 3300 patients shows that both the general and cardiovascular tolerability of milnacipran are superior to those of TCAs with notably less cholinergic side effects. The tolerance of milnacipran was comparable to that of SSRIs with a higher incidence of dysuria with milnacipran but a higher frequency of nausea and anxiety with the SSRIs. Milnacipran represents an interesting new therapeutic option in depression, being as well tolerated as the SSRIs but offering clinical efficacy similar to the TCAs.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1998

Effect of acute, short- and long-term milnacipran administration on rat locus coeruleus noradrenergic and dorsal raphe serotonergic neurons.

The effect of milnacipran on the firing activity of dorsal raphe serotonin (5-HT) neurons and locus coeruleus norepineprine (NE) neurons was assessed using extracellular unitary recording in chloral hydrate anesthetized rats. A 2-day treatment with milnacipran (20 or 60 mg/kg/day, s.c.) markedly decreased the firing rate of NE neurons, and it remained reduced after a 7- or a 14-day treatment. Although the suppressant effect of the alpha2-adrenergic agonist clonidine on the firing rate of NE neurons was markedly reduced following long-term milnacipran (60 mg/kg/day x 14 days, s.c.), that of NE remained unchanged. The firing rate of 5-HT neurons was reduced following a 2-day treatment with milnacipran (20 mg/kg/day, s.c.), but there was a partial recovery after a 7-day treatment (20 mg/kg/day, s.c.) and a complete one after a 14-day treatment (20, 40 or 60 mg/kg/day, s.c.). The suppressant effect of 5-HT and of the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT (8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin) on the firing rate of 5-HT neurons was also unaltered after milnacipran (60 mg/kg/day x 14 days, s.c.). The latter milnacipran treatment did not affect the uptake of [3H]5-HT but it inhibited that of [3H]NE by 30% in hippocampal slices. The NE system was thus investigated in an attempt to explain the effects of milnacipran on the firing activity of 5-HT neurons. Acute injection of milnacipran suppressed the firing activity of 5-HT neurons (with an ED50 of 5.7+/-1.5 mg/kg, i.v.), but not in NE-denervated rats. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of clonidine on 5-HT neuron firing activity was markedly reduced by the long-term milnacipran treatment, whereas the inhibition of electrically evoked release of [3H]NE as well as that of [3H]5-HT produced by the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist UK 14.304 from preloaded mesencephalic slices containing the dorsal raphe was unaltered. The latter results indicate that the alpha2-adrenergic autoreceptor and heteroreceptor were unaffected in the raphe area by milnacipran. In conclusion, milnacipran had profound effects on the function of 5-HT and NE neurons, and the mechanism by which 5-HT neurons regained their normal firing during milnacipran treatment appeared to implicate the NE system.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗
PubMed1996

Milnacipran and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in major depression.

In drug development the move from tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) involved not only the loss of the direct receptor interactions responsible for the adverse side effects of TCAs, but also the ability to inhibit the reuptake of noradrenaline. Selectivity for the single neurotransmitter, serotonin, may explain why SSRIs tend to be less efficacious than the TCAs, especially in more serious forms of depression. The advent of selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) has tended to confirm the idea that an action on both monoamine systems is important for maximal antidepressant efficacy. This paper reviews clinical trials comparing the new SNRI milnacipran with the SSRIs fluoxetine and fluvoxamine. A meta-analysis of the principal trials shows greater response rates (the proportion of patients with a decrease in symptom scores of 50% or more) with milnacipran (50 mg twice a day) than with fluoxetine (20 mg once a day), or fluvoxamine (100 mg twice a day) (milnacipran: 64%; SSRIs: 50%). Remission rates (the proportion of patients with Hamilton Depression Rating Scores of 7 or below) were also higher with milnacipran than with SSRIs (39 versus 28%). In one study, in which 100 mg milnacipran was given once a day in the evening, the higher response rate obtained with fluoxetine appears to be largely attributable to an inappropriate milnacipran dosage regimen. Data from a pharmacovigilance database including all patients participating in clinical trials with milnacipran (n = 5732) showed that, compared with the SSRIs, milnacipran produced fewer gastrointestinal side effects, such as nausea, and less anxiety. Milnacipran was, however, associated with a higher incidence of headache, dry mouth and dysuria. The results of these studies suggest that milnacipran is superior in efficacy to SSRIs and is equally well tolerated. Milnacipran, therefore, appears to offer a therapeutic advantage over the SSRIs.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗
PubMed2004

Acute effect of milnacipran on the relationship between the locus coeruleus noradrenergic and dorsal raphe serotonergic neuronal transmitters.

The present studies sought to investigate the effect of milnacipran called the serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) on the interaction of central locus coeruleus noradrenergic and dorsal raphe nucleus serotonergic functional activity by utilizing in vivo microdialysis. A single administration of milnacipran (60 mg/kg, s.c.) markedly decreased the levels of NA and its metabolite, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxymandelic acid (HMMA), in the locus coeruleus and the levels of, a metabolite of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (5-HIAA) in the dorsal raphe nucleus. Combined administration of yohimbine (2 mg/kg, s.c.),?alpha(2)-adrenoceptor?antagonist, at 2 h after milnacipran (60 mg/kg, s.c.) led to a significant increase in NA levels in the locus coeruleus, although yohimbine alone had no effect on these levels. Under similar experimental condition, 5-HIAA levels in the dorsal raphe nucleus remained unchanged. NAN-190 (1 mg/kg, s.c.), 5-HT(1A) receptor partial agonist, alone markedly decreased the levels of 5-HIAA in the dorsal raphe nucleus, although this level was not affected by WAY100635, the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist. WAY100635 recovered the milnacipran-induced decrease of 5-HIAA levels in the dorsal raphe nucleus to control levels. On the other hand, NAN-190 did not affect the milnacipran-induced decrease of 5-HIAA levels. Behavioral signs (locomotion and rearing) were markedly observed following milnacipran alone or combined administration of milnacipran and yohimbine. However, the behavioral signs after coadministration of milnacipran and WAY100635 or NAN-190 were relatively poor. These results may suggest that an increase of NA in the locus coeruleus with the treatment of yohimbine after milnacipran results from negative feedback following the blockade of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors achieved with yohimbine, and that WAY100635 but not NAN-190 recovered milnacipran-induced decrease of 5-HIAA in the dorsal raphe nucleus to control levels by preventing the activation for the presynaptic 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗
PubMed2006

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction when switching from fluoxetine to milnacipran.

The lack of a therapeutic effect or unsupportable side-effects can lead to substitution of one antidepressant by another. The present study investigated potential modifications to the pharmacokinetic profile of milnacipran at steady-state when it is substituted for fluoxetine without any washout period. The open-label, multiple dose, three-period study was carried out in 12 evaluable healthy volunteers. A reference period (period 1) comprising a 3.5-day treatment with milnacipran at 50 mg b.i.d. was followed, after a 5-10-day washout, by 3 weeks of administration of 20 mg fluoxetine once daily (period 2), immediately followed by a further 3.5 days of administration of milnacipran at 50 mg b.i.d. (period 3). Blood samples collected at each period were analysed for milnacipran, N-dealkyl milnacipran, fluoxetine and norfluoxetine. Potential drug-drug interactions were evaluated by comparing milnacipran pharmacokinetic parameters between periods 1 and 3. A steady-state of fluoxetine and its metabolite was effectively reached by the end of the 3-week period. A steady-state of milnacipran was reached on day 2 of both periods 1 and 3. Trough concentrations of milnacipran were 66 and 65 ng/ml before and after the fluoxetine administration period, respectively. Cmax values were 226 and 248 ng/ml. When comparing the kinetic parameters of milnacipran before and after fluoxetine treatment, all the 90% confidence intervals were in the 20% range. No significant difference in the adverse events of milnacipran was observed before or after fluoxetine administration.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Controlled comparison of two doses of milnacipran (F 2207) and amitriptyline in major depressive inpatients.

A multicenter study compared the antidepressant efficacy and the tolerance of two doses of milnacipran (50 mg and 100 mg/day) and amitriptyline (150 mg/day) in three parallel groups of 45 major depressive inpatients defined by Research Diagnostic Criteria. After a wash-out period of 4-7 days on placebo with lorazepam and/or nitrazepam if necessary, patients were randomly assigned to a daily dose of milnacipran 50 mg, milnacipran 100 mg or amitriptyline 150 mg reached on the 5th day and then stable over a 4-week period, with weekly assessments by means of the Montgomery and Asberg depression scale, the Hamilton depression scale, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) and the Target Emergent Signs and Symptoms. Results showed significant superiority of both milnacipran 100 mg/day and amitriptyline over milnacipran 50 mg/day at the end of the treatment period. However, amitriptyline induced a nonsignificant trend toward more rapid improvement after 2 weeks of treatment, mainly based on items related to insomnia, supporting more sedative properties of amitriptyline as compared to milnacipran. Anticholinergic side-effects were significantly lower with milnacipran than with amitriptyline, explaining why milnacipran 100 mg exhibited at the end of the treatment period, a nonsignificantly better efficacy index on the CGI. Moreover, in contrast to milnacipran, amitriptyline was responsible for a significant decrease in blood pressure and a significant weight gain.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Autoradiographic characterization of binding sites for [3H]milnacipran, a new antidepressant drug, and their relationship to the serotonin transporter in rat brain.

Milnacipran is a new antidepressant drug and an equipotent inhibitor of the uptake of serotonin and noradrenaline. Quantitative autoradiography and radioligand binding studies were used to characterize recognition sites of [3H]milnacipran in rat brain. [3H]Milnacipran demonstrated saturable, reversible and nanomolar affinity binding. The binding was Na(+)-dependent, potently displaced by serotonin uptake inhibitors in all structures and moderately or weakly displaced by catecholamine uptake inhibitors (order of potency: paroxetine > fluoxetine > mazindol > desipramine > nomifensine > maprotiline). High density of recognition sites were found in structures dense in serotonergic innervation (raphe, basal ganglia, colliculi, cortex). The autoradiographic pattern of [3H]milnacipran recognition sites resembled that of [3H]paroxetine, but their distribution did not correlate well in some structures. Selective lesioning of serotonergic neurons by intracerebral injection of 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine caused a large decrease of [3H]milnacipran binding in various regions (septum, caudate, hippocampus, thalamus, ventral and dorsal hypothalamus), but in other structures, the [3H]milnacipran binding was partially affected (putamen) or even unchanged (amygdala, lateral hypothalamus). In contrast, lesion of noradrenergic neurons by intraperitoneal administration of [N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine] did not affect the binding of [3H]milnacipran in any region. These results show that [3H]milnacipran mainly binds to the serotonin transporter and does not recognize the catecholamine transporters under the conditions used. In addition, [3H]milnacipran might also bind to other sites, serotonin transporter localized on non-serotonergic neurons or serotonergic neurons insensitive to 5,7-DHT neurotoxicity.

5,7-Dihydroxytryptamine↗
PubMed1990

Pooling two controlled comparisons of milnacipran (F2207) and amitriptyline in endogenous inpatients. A new approach in dose ranging studies.

Milnacipran is a new potential antidepressant selected for its equipotent inhibition of noradrenaline and serotonin uptake and its lack of effect at any postsynaptic receptor. We recently compared milnacipran 100 and 50 mg/d and amitriptyline 150 mg/d in three parallel randomized groups of major depressive inpatients and found a statistically significant superiority of milnacipran 100 mg/d and amitriptyline over milnacipran 50 mg/d after 4 weeks of treatment. Later on we found similar improvement with milnacipran 200 mg and amitriptyline 150 mg but better tolerance with milnacipran. In order to compare the therapeutic activity of the three doses of milnacipran (50 mg/d, 100 mg/d, and 200 mg/d) we used the responses to amitriptyline as a reference against which to compare the 3 doses of the new drug using analysis of variance on the adjusted data. This approach reveals milnacipran 200 mg is more effective than milnacipran 50 and 100 mg and is the only dose which shows efficacy at least equivalent to that of amitriptyline 150 mg. The dose/efficacy relationship was linear.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed2005

Lack of interaction of milnacipran with the cytochrome p450 isoenzymes frequently involved in the metabolism of antidepressants.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of milnacipran in extensive metabolisers (EMs) and poor metabolisers (PMs) of sparteine and mephenytoin, and to assess the influence of multiple administrations of milnacipran on the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes through its own metabolism and through various probes, namely CYP2D6 (sparteine/dextromethorphan), CYP2C19 (mephenytoin), CYP1A2 (caffeine) and CYP3A4 (endogenous 6-beta-hydroxy-cortisol excretion). METHODS: Twenty-five healthy subjects, 12 EMs for both sparteine/dextromethorphan and mephenytoin, nine EMs for mephenytoin and PMs for sparteine/dextromethorphan (PM(2D6)) and four PMs for mephenytoin and EMs for sparteine/dextromethorphan (PM(2C19)) were administered milnacipran as a single 50 mg capsule on day 1 followed by a 50 mg capsule twice daily for 7 days. The pharmacokinetics of milnacipran and its oxidative metabolites were assessed after the first dose (day 1) and after multiple administration (day 8), and were compared for differences between CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 PMs and EMs. Metabolic tests were performed before (day -2), during (days 1 and 8) and after (day 20) milnacipran administration. RESULTS: Milnacipran steady state was rapidly achieved. Metabolism was limited: approximately 50% unchanged drug, 30% as glucuronide and 20% as oxidative metabolite (mainly F2800 the N-dealkyl metabolite). Milnacipran administration to PM2D6 and PM2C19 subjects did not increase parent drug exposure or decrease metabolite exposure. Milnacipran oxidative metabolism is not mediated through CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 polymorphic pathways nor does it significantly interact with CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 activities. CONCLUSION: Limited reciprocal pharmacokinetic interaction between milnacipran and CYP isoenzymes would confer flexibility in the therapeutic use of the drug when combined with antidepressants. Drug-drug interaction risk would be low, even if the combined treatments were likely to inhibit CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 isoenzyme activities.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Clinical tolerance of a new antidepressant -- milnacipran].

Milnacipran is a new antidepressant which has been developed for its selective inhibition of both serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake with a good safety and tolerability profile. The efficacy and tolerance profile of this antidepressant have been compared with those of tricyclic and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants (SSRIs) in open-label and placebo-controlled trials. But no data in clinical practice are available. The authors studied the tolerability of milnacipran (100 to 200 mg/d) in 28 depressed inpatients receiving usual comedications during a mean period of 33 days (3 to 107 days). The incidence of adverse events was determined with the help of the Pharmacovigilance Center of the Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (Besançon, France). Among the 28 patients, milnacipran was well tolerated by 18 of them. Side-effects were noted in 10 patients, but they led to withdrawal of the antidepressant in only 2 cases, where dyspnea, palpitations, pollakiuria in a case and headache, nausea, dysuria in the other case occurred. The most frequent adverse event observed was hypotension (n = 6), but in each case it occurred just after the addition of sedative phenothiazines (n = 5) or of a comedication with phenothiazines and valpromide (n = 1). So this side-effect could not be attributed to milnacipran alone. Treatments with heptaminol or theodrenaline and cafedrine were useful. An increase of the cardiac frequency seemed to occur with milnacipran (p < 0.06). It was observed in the 5 inpatients for whom this cardiovascular parameter was recorded before and during the milnacipran treatment. In 5 other patients, the cardiac frequency seemed to decrease when milnacipran was stopped for lack of good efficacy or adverse events. Gastrointestinal disturbances were scarce isolated (nausea n = 1), but necessitated a treatment with metopimazine. The milnacipran prescription (100 mg/d) after an other antidepressant treatment had been done without a withdrawal period and without problem, even when the previous antidepressant was a SSRIs with a long half-life and CYP450 inhibitory properties. The authors concluded to the good tolerability of milnacipran in usual clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Effect of prolonged exposure to milnacipran on norepinephrine transporter in cultured bovine adrenal medullary cells.

The antidepressants milnacipran and paroxetine are used clinically worldwide. In the present study, we report here the effects of treatment with milnacipran and paroxetine on the functional activity, binding sites, and mRNA of the norepinephrine (NE) transporter (NET) in cultured bovine adrenal medullary cells. In acute treatment with antidepressants for 20 min, both milnacipran and paroxetine competitively inhibited NET function in cultured adrenal medullary cells. Prolonged treatment of adrenal medullary cells with milnacipran produced time (48-96h)- and concentration (35-355 nM)-dependent increases in [3H]NE uptake and [3H]DMI binding without any increase in NET mRNA. At a high concentration (800 nM, 72 h), paroxetine suppressed [3H]NE uptake. To examine whether milnacipran-induced [3H]NE uptake is mediated by newly synthesized mRNAs or proteins, we used actinomycin D, an inhibitor of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and cycloheximide, an inhibitor of ribosomal protein synthesis. Cycloheximide (1 micorM, 72 h) abolished the effect of milnacipran on [3H]NE uptake, while the stimulatory effect of milnacipran was observed in actinomycin D-treated cells. The present findings suggest that prolonged exposure to milnacipran up-regulates the NET function, probably through a post-transcriptional process of NET or other proteins.

Adrenal Medulla↗
PubMed2005

Subchronic milnacipran treatment increases basal extracellular noradrenaline concentrations in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats.

In this study, we investigated the acute effects of milnacipran, a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, following subchronic treatment with milnacipran (30 mg/kg periorally for 7 days) on extracellular noradrenaline, dopamine and serotonin concentrations in the medial prefrontal cortex. Subchronic administration of milnacipran produced significantly higher basal levels of extracellular noradrenaline. Acute milnacipran administration following subchronic milnacipran treatment for 7 days produced a greater increase in extracellular noradrenaline than a single dose of milnacipran alone. The present results suggest that subchronic milnacipran treatment enhances noradrenergic neural transmission beyond that achieved with acute administration of milnacipran alone, but has no effect on serotonergic or dopaminergic neural transmission.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

A comparative study of milnacipran and paroxetine in outpatients with major depression.

BACKGROUND: Milnacipran is a dual-action antidepressant which inhibits both serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake with no affinity for any neurotransmitter receptor studied. METHODS: A 6-week double-blind multicentre study compared milnacipran (100 mg/day) with paroxetine (20 mg/day) in 300 outpatients with major depression. Efficacy was evaluated using HAMD17, MADRS and CGI for severity of illness and global improvement. Data were analysed on an intention to treat, last observation carried forward, basis. RESULTS: Milnacipran and paroxetine were both effective and well tolerated with no significant difference in their effects. After treatment discontinuation, milnacipran was associated with significantly less emergent symptoms. Responders, at endpoint, to milnacipran had significantly greater levels of psychomotor retardation at baseline than non-responders. LIMITATIONS: The study did not include a placebo group so that it is impossible to determine absolute levels of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Both milnacipran and paroxetine were effective and well tolerated by outpatients with major depression treated for 6 weeks. After treatment discontinuation milnacipran was associated with less emergent symptoms. Psychomotor retardation at baseline may be a predictive factor of a favourable response to milnacipran.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗