Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Microcosting”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Improved financial management of the radiology department with a microcosting system.

The basic unit of service in radiology is the examination or procedure and its associated costs such as film, medical and surgical supplies, personnel, equipment depreciation, and overhead. The appropriate allocation of all operating costs to the specific examination types is the purpose of the microcosting system. Microcosting programs use data from hospital expense and payroll systems and data from a radiology information management system. These data are loaded into a computer spread sheet program for the microcosting computations. The results from using this system include better understanding of costs, accurate budget projections, confidence in negotiating discounts, and improved efficiency and reduced costs.

Accounting

The origins of hospital microcosting.

This paper begins with a definition of microcosting, including the specification of design criteria and a general model framework. The necessity for micro- as opposed to macro-costing is discussed. Examples of microcosting systems are provided. Relative value scale and case-mix alternatives to microcosting are presented.

Cost Allocation

A microcosting and cost consequence analysis from a randomized controlled trial comparing genome sequencing with exome sequencing for genetic diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Diagnosing rare diseases is costly. The objectives were to microcost exome (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) trios and estimate the incremental costs of GS per additional diagnosis from an institutional payer perspective. METHODS: Trios (proband plus biological parents) that are referred for sequencing were randomly assigned to ES or GS. Laboratory workflow and sequencing were microcosted. Total and category cost per trio were estimated probabilistically. Effectiveness was expressed as diagnostic yield (rates of diagnostic or partially diagnostic variants detected). Incremental costs and effectiveness were calculated. RESULTS: The mean total cost per trio was CAD 2888.79 (95% CI 2567.72, 3492.72) for ES (n = 329) and 4364.02 (95% CI 3984.94, 5013.67) for GS (n = 324). Reagents accounted for 34% and 61% of total costs for ES and GS, respectively. The incremental cost of GS was 1475.23. The diagnostic yield was 35.9% for ES and 32.7% for GS with a difference of 0.032 (95% CI: -0.041, 0.104, P value .397). CONCLUSION: GS demonstrated higher costs and a similar diagnostic yield to ES but was limited by technical capabilities at the time of the study. The study provides comprehensive costs for the economic evaluation comparing alternative diagnostic pathways and impetus for further evaluating variants uniquely detectable by GS.

Humans

Microcost analysis of inpatient dispensing and administration of oral solids.

The labor cost of dispensing, administering, and monitoring unit dose oral solid dosage forms (UDs) in a large teaching hospital was determined by microcost analysis. The costs associated with UDs dispensed by the midnight central pharmacy and by a satellite pharmacy were evaluated by use of both work-sampling and time-and-motion studies. Pharmacy personnel activities were classified as direct, auxiliary, or nonproductive. A nursing productivity index was used to determine the nursing time consumed in the administration and monitoring of UDs. The pharmacy labor cost was lowest ($0.14 each) for UDs dispensed from the central pharmacy in the 24-hour medication cart. For each UD that was not dispensed in the 24-hour cart, the labor cost was $0.25 for the central pharmacy and $1.37 for the satellite pharmacy. It took nurses 223.8 sec to administer and monitor a scheduled UD, for a cost of $0.82. The total nursing time spent per nonscheduled UD for administration and monitoring was 574.2 sec; the cost was $2.11. Microcost analysis can be used to isolate the costs of dispensing oral solids in an inpatient setting.

Chicago

Microcosting method for small-volume injectables.

The costs of preparing different small-volume injectables (SVIs) in a centralized i.v. admixture pharmacy in a 650-bed teaching hospital were calculated using a microcosting method. The types of SVIs produced and methods of preparation were identified. Time-and-motion and work-sampling studies were performed to determine the amount of pharmacist and technician time spent in SVI production, auxiliary activities, and nonproductive activities. The costs of material and equipment used were calculated, and waste-cost factors based on percentages of wasted SVIs were determined. To determine the final cost per unit prepared, the calculated costs were added and multiplied by the appropriate waste factors. On the average, it took 5.57 minutes of total personnel time to prepare an SVI. It took an average of 192.4 seconds and 16.6 seconds for the technicians and pharmacists, respectively, to reconstitute a vial of powder and prepare an SVI in a minibag. Bulk prepacked items and admixtures prepared from vials of powder for reconstitution and stored in minibags were, respectively, the least and most expensive SVIs. By using microcosting methods to determine the cost of preparing SVIs, this institution discovered that the cost figures were much higher than it had anticipated. These data can be used to improve productivity and cost efficiency and to compare the costs of in-house and commercially available preparations.

Costs and Cost Analysis

Microcost analysis of the prescription dispensing process in an outpatient hospital pharmacy.

The costs involved in dispensing a prescription in an outpatient pharmacy at a 450-bed teaching hospital were studied. Work sampling was used to determine pharmacist and technician time involved in dispensing a prescription, and other direct and indirect costs involved in dispensing a prescription were isolated. The cost per prescription was calculated as the total of personnel costs for dispensing plus other costs, excluding the cost of the drug. Average of 2.68 and 3.37 minutes of pharmacist and technician time, respectively, were directly involved in dispensing each prescription. The standard auxiliary times per prescription were calculated to be 1.17 minutes and 4.66 minutes for the two groups, respectively. Total pharmacy personnel time consumed in dispensing a prescription was 13.33 minutes. Total calculated personnel cost included in dispensing a prescription was +3.14. Adding to this figure other direct and indirect costs resulted in a total cost of +5.42 for dispensing a prescription. Although the time and cost figures identified are unique to this outpatient pharmacy, other institutions can use these microcosting techniques to provide data that can be useful in the negotiation of contracts for the provision of pharmaceutical services to ambulatory patients.

Costs and Cost Analysis

The cost and cost trajectory of genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis for Indigenous children with suspected rare diseases.

PURPOSE: Indigenous peoples are underrepresented in reference genome libraries. Consequently, rare disease diagnosis may require bespoke bioinformatics analyses of genome sequences. Establishing diagnostic cost is crucial to support policy development for equitable diagnosis of rare diseases. We estimated the cost and cost trajectory of diagnostic genome sequencing and bioinformatics for Indigenous participants with suspected rare diseases. METHODS: We conducted a microcosting study of Indigenous children and their families receiving genome sequencing through Canada's Silent Genomes Project. Invoice data informed the costs of genome sequencing. We conducted a time-and-motion study for bioinformatics analyses, including labor, computing, and data storage costs. RESULTS: With standard bioinformatics, costs ranged from C$3645 (SD: 455) for singletons to C$7402 (SD: 566) for trios. With advanced, bespoke bioinformatics, costs ranged from C$5344 (SD: 634) for singletons to C$9760 (SD: 822) for trios. Genome sequencing was a primary cost driver; however, sequencing costs decreased by 61% over 4 years. Bioinformatics costs ranged from 21.3% to 58.3% of the total costs. The time required for bioinformatics ranged from 71 hours to 215 hours for standard and advanced analyses, respectively. CONCLUSION: Genome sequencing costs decreased over time. Bioinformatics is a significant cost driver, particularly for bespoke analyses arising from nonrepresentative reference libraries.

Humans

Linking women leaving jail to medications for opioid use disorder: Costs to implement pre-release telehealth and peer navigation services.

AIMS: Telehealth and peer navigation are feasible strategies for connecting women in the criminal-legal system with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), yet implementation costs are not well understood. This study conducted a microcosting analysis of two interventions for women leaving jail in Kentucky: pre-release, PreTreatment Telehealth with a MOUD provider (TH-Only) and PreTreatment Telehealth combined with peer navigation (TH+PN) through the Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN). METHODS: From the provider perspective, we estimated total start-up costs, total intervention costs, and average cost per participant. Women participating in the clinical trial were randomly assigned to TH-Only (n=299) or TH+PN (n=301). Start-up costs were incurred primarily in 2019 - 2020; intervention costs represent expenses in 2021 - 2023. Cost data were collected from study and agency financial records and interviews with research staff and analyzed using Microsoft Excel (version 16.90.2). RESULTS: Start-up costs were $36,320, comprising planning, meetings, travel, and supplies. The total cost of TH-Only was $60,767, representing 259 telehealth sessions with an average duration of 47 minutes. Total cost of TH+PN was $472,148 based on 270 telehealth sessions (48 minutes), 268 peer navigation (PN) sessions (30 minutes), and 12 weeks of PN support post-release per participant. Average cost per TH-Only participant was $235 and per TH+PN participant was $1,760. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth may be a relatively low-cost approach for jails lacking on-site MOUD services. Although more costly, combining telehealth with PN may add value by supporting service continuity and facilitating linkage to treatment during the jail to community transition.

Humans

Principles and methods of managerial cost-accounting systems.

An introduction to cost-accounting systems for pharmacy managers is provided; terms are defined and examples of specific applications are given. Cost-accounting systems determine, record, and report the resources consumed in providing services. An effective cost-accounting system must provide the information needed for both internal and external reports. In accounting terms, cost is the value given up to secure an asset. In determining how volumes of activity affect costs, fixed costs and variable costs are calculated; applications include pricing strategies, cost determinations, and break-even analysis. Also discussed are the concepts of direct and indirect costs, opportunity costs, and incremental and sunk costs. For most pharmacy department services, process costing, an accounting of intermediate outputs and homogeneous units, is used; in determining the full cost of providing a product or service (e.g., patient stay), job-order costing is used. Development of work-performance standards is necessary for monitoring productivity and determining product costs. In allocating pharmacy department costs, a ratio of costs to charges can be used; this method is convenient, but microcosting (specific identification of the costs of products) is more accurate. Pharmacy managers can use cost-accounting systems to evaluate the pharmacy's strategies, policies, and services and to improve budgets and reports.

Accounting