Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

Prognostic modeling of overall survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer: an inflammation-based tool validated in PANTHEIA-SEOM cohort.

PURPOSE: To develop and internally validate the PANTHEIA-SIRI prognostic model, which integrates log-transformed systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) with clinical predictors, to estimate overall survival (OS) in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) treated with first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: We used data from the multicenter PANTHEIA-SEOM registry. OS was defined from chemotherapy start. The model was fitted as a Weibull accelerated failure time model in the survival-analysis population with multiple imputation. Predictors were log-transformed baseline SIRI, modeled with restricted cubic splines, ECOG, tumor burden, chemotherapy regimen, and anorexia-cachexia syndrome. Internal validation used a separate, non-overlapping cohort from the same registry; the centers contributing to each cohort are listed in a supplementary annex. TRIPOD was followed. Discrimination was assessed with Harrell´s C-index and calibration with IPCW Brier scores and IPA. RESULTS: The derivation cohort comprised 672 patients with SIRI data (593 analyzed for survival) across 22 Spanish hospitals (2015-2025); 80.1% had died after a median OS of 9.9 months. The imputation-pooled derivation C-index was 0.654 (95% CI, 0.627-0.681); optimism-corrected, 0.629. Internal validation used 62 separate patients from the same registry; 96.8% had died after a median OS of 9.2 months. The validation C-index was 0.603 (95% CI, 0.518-0.687). Calibration was adequate at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The PANTHEIA-SIRI model provides individualized OS estimates in mPDAC with routine clinical predictors. Its open-access calculator ( https://pantheia-siri.shinyapps.io/calc/ ) may support prognostic communication, treatment-intensity selection, and supportive-care planning. Routine clinical implementation will require further validation in larger, fully independent cohorts.

Cachexia

NFATc1 drives Orai3 transcription and proteolysis by harnessing epigenome differences in the MARCH8 promoter.

Several autonomous mechanisms regulate protein expression, such as transcription, translation, post-translational modifications, and epigenetic changes. Rarely, these processes are controlled by the same molecular player with overlapping roles. Here, we reveal that transcription factor NFATc1 regulates both transcription and degradation of the Ca2+ channel Orai3 in a context-dependent manner. We demonstrate that NFATc1 drives Orai3 transcription in non-metastatic pancreatic cancer cells. In invasive and metastatic pancreatic cancer cells, NFATc1 induces Orai3 lysosomal degradation by transcriptionally enhancing MARCH8 E3-ubiquitin ligase. We show that MARCH8 physically interacts with Orai3 intracellular loop eventually resulting in its ubiquitination at the N-terminal. Mechanistically, the dichotomy in the regulation of Orai3 expression emerges from the differences in MARCH8 epigenetic landscape. We uncover that MARCH8 promoter is hyper-methylated in non-metastatic cells. Importantly, we demonstrate that MARCH8 restricts pancreatic cancer metastasis by targeting Orai3 degradation, thereby highlighting the pathophysiological importance of this signaling module. Taken together, we report a unique and clinically relevant scenario wherein the same transcription factor both enhances and curtails the expression of a target protein in cancer.

Humans

Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: Targeting KRAS and Beyond.

For the past decades, chemotherapy constituted the therapeutic foundation in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Despite significant advances in the molecular understanding, translation into tangible patient benefit has remained modest. Until recently, mutant KRAS, the dominant oncogenic driver, was considered undruggable, and only a small subgroup of patients potentially benefited from targeted therapies. With the emergence of KRAS inhibitors, most patients with pancreatic cancer in theory qualify for targeted therapeutics. Final results from the RASolute 302 trial showed clinically meaningful activity of RAS inhibition in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and paved the way for approval. Ongoing preclinical and coclinical studies have documented both intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance to KRAS inhibition. Given the cellular plasticity seen in pancreatic cancer, the identification and anticipation of resistance mechanisms will be critical to exploit emerging therapeutic vulnerabilities through novel combination strategies. In view of the increasing number of trials and the growing body of evidence for targeted therapies, pancreatic cancer is entering a transitional phase in which precision oncology strategies must be redefined beyond rare molecular subgroups. In this review, we will briefly revisit targeted therapeutic approaches in pancreatic cancer to then discuss the clinical implications of genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity in KRAS-mutant and KRAS wild-type disease. We will outline how our expanding biological insights into pancreatic cancer could inform combination and sequential therapeutic approaches.

Humans

UNC5B regulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through a SRC-ZEB1 signaling axis to facilitate pancreatic cancer metastasis.

Metastatic dissemination is the principal cause of death in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet the molecular determinants that enable this process remain poorly understood. Here, we identify the axon guidance receptor UNC5B as a central regulator of PDAC metastasis. Using both genetically engineered KPCU and orthotopic mouse models, we demonstrate that loss of UNC5B completely abolishes metastatic spread, reduces tumor proliferative capacity, increases intratumoral necrosis, confining tumors to the pancreas with no invasion into adjacent tissues or lymph nodes and preserving epithelial morphology. Mechanistically, UNC5B drives epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and invasion through activation of the SRC-ZEB1 axis. Notably, UNC5B specifically engages ZEB1 to drive EMT, without altering other canonical EMT transcription factors such as SNAIL or TWIST1. Pharmacological degradation of exogenous UNC5B using a targeted protein degrader (degron) modulated EMT and invasive behavior in PDAC cells. Acute depletion of UNC5B resulted in a marked reduction in EMT scores, accompanied by decreased ZEB1 and SRC levels. Together, these findings identify UNC5B as a central molecular hub governing metastatic competence in PDAC by promoting EMT and invasion.

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

Systemic treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

IMPORTANCE: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic diagnosis with historically poor prognosis. It is the tenth most prevalent cancer in the US & UK. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 10%. Despite increasing understanding of its molecular biology, systemic treatment options for advanced disease remain limited, and survival outcomes have improved only modestly over the past decade. OBSERVATIONS: This narrative review traces the evolution of systemic therapy for advanced PDAC from gemcitabine monotherapy through the landmark FOLFIRINOX (PRODIGE trial) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (MPACT trial) combination regimens, which remain the standard of care. Second-line options including liposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV (NAPOLI-1) and maintenance olaparib for germline BRCA1/2-mutated disease (POLO) are also reviewed. Emerging data on sequential treatment strategies (SEQUENCE trial), biomarker-driven treatment selection (PRIMUS-001, PASS-01), and precision medicine approaches targeting actionable molecular subgroups, including dMMR/MSI-H, NTRK fusions, and homologous recombination deficiency are discussed. Real-world evidence comparing FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel is critically appraised, including the challenges of patient selection, tolerance, and applicability outside clinical trial settings. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Despite incremental progress, the treatment landscape of advanced PDAC remains challenging. Molecular stratification and biomarker-driven precision oncology represent the most promising path forward. This review serves as a clinical reference for physicians managing advanced pancreatic cancer, highlighting current evidence, evidence limitations, and future research priorities including prospective biomarker-driven trials and improved access to genomic testing.

Biomarkers

A cell-state axis underlying colonization in carcinomas with implications for metastasis risk prediction and interception.

Metastasis to the liver drives mortality in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet mechanisms of colonization remain unclear. Using genomic barcoding, we developed a clonal competition model under immune surveillance, isolating murine PDAC subclones with high or low liver-colonization potential. Combined transcriptome and chromatin-accessibility analyses revealed a distinct "metastatic-potential axis," separate from the normal-to-PDAC and classical-basal axes. We established "MetScore" as a biomarker of this axis. MetScore distinguishes metastases from primary PDAC tumors in patients, predicts outcomes beyond classical-basal classifications, and generalizes across carcinoma subtypes, suggesting conserved colonization mechanisms. High-MetScore PDAC cells preferentially occupy immune cell-enriched niches, suggesting they remodel the metastatic microenvironment. Functional screening identified c-Fos as a positive mediator of colonization and a candidate anti-metastatic target. Collectively, we identify a cell-state axis underpinning PDAC liver colonization, introduce MetScore as a broadly applicable biomarker, and nominate actionable targets for peri-operative therapeutic intervention.

Animals

Chinese expert consensus on precision testing and molecular diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (2025).

This consensus by the CSCO Pancreatic Cancer Expert Committee establishes evidence-based guidelines for molecular testing in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. It details recommendations for biomarkers (e.g., KRAS, BRCA, MSI), liquid biopsy, and precision imaging to direct targeted therapies and immunotherapy, aiming to standardize diagnosis and optimize individualized patient care. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common pathological type of primary pancreatic malignancy, accounting for ~95% of cases and generally referred to as pancreatic cancer [1]. Its prognosis is extremely poor and its incidence continues to rise [2]. According to the most recent global cancer statistics, the incidence of pancreatic cancer ranks 12th among all cancers, and its mortality ranks 6th, making it one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide [3]. Approximately 57% of patients have metastatic disease at diagnosis and require systemic therapy, for which chemotherapy remains the standard first-line option [1]. However, the overall response rate to currently available systemic regimens is low, and the 5-year survival rate for patients with metastatic disease remains below 5% [3]. Although most pancreatic cancers harbor canonical driver mutations, they exhibit marked heterogeneity at the molecular level. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and integrative genomic analyses have identified molecular subtypes of PDAC with potential clinical relevance [4-9]. With the increasing implementation of precision oncology, the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer give a level 1 recommendation to perform genetic and other molecular testing on tissue or cytologic specimens as part of the pathological diagnostic work-up, in order to guide individualized treatment, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy [10]. To further promote the use of genetic and molecular testing in the precision treatment of pancreatic cancer, the CSCO Pancreatic Cancer Expert Committee convened a multidisciplinary panel to develop the present Chinese Expert Consensus on Precision Testing and Molecular Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer (2025), aiming to provide clinicians with an authoritative reference for precision diagnostics and treatment decision-making.

Humans

GSTT1 promotes stemness and FGFR inhibitor sensitivity in pancreatic cancer through regulation of CD133 (PROM1).

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is among the deadliest malignancies, driven by metastatic progression and profound cellular heterogeneity. We previously identified glutathione S-transferase theta 1 (GSTT1) as a regulator of a slow-cycling, highly metastatic tumor cell population, suggesting that GSTT1High cells may possess stem-like properties. Here, we define the functional and molecular features of this subpopulation in metastatic PDA. Using a mCherry-tagged Gstt1 reporter system in metastatic murine PDAC cells, we enriched for Gstt1High cells and observed increased tumor sphere formation, accompanied by upregulation of stemness-associated genes including PROM1 (CD133) and activation of Wnt and FGF signaling pathways. In human PDA models, CD133HighGSTT1High cells exhibited enhanced tumor sphere initiation and expansion compared to other populations, defining a maximal stem-like state. Notably, sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors was observed only under tumor sphere conditions, highlighting a context-dependent therapeutic vulnerability. Mechanistically, FGFR3 expression correlated with GSTT1 and CD133 levels, and FGF signaling was required to sustain this state. GSTT1 knockdown reduced CD133 protein levels, impaired tumor sphere formation, and altered sensitivity to FGFR inhibition. These findings were largely recapitulated in patient-derived PDA organoids, where GSTT1 and PROM1 co-expression predicted increased tumor sphere formation and enhanced response to the multi-kinase inhibitor Nintedanib. Together, these results identify a GSTT1HighCD133High stem-like subpopulation in metastatic PDA and identify an FGFR-dependent signaling axis that sustains this state, representing a potential therapeutic vulnerability.

AC133 Antigen

From Diagnosis, Therapy Decision-Making to Genetic Risk Assessment: The Impact of ctDNA Testing on Comprehensive Cancer Management-A Case Report.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing is a minimally invasive alternative to tissue biopsy and is ideal for inaccessible tumors or limited samples. It captures tumor heterogeneity over time and different anatomic locations, unlike the static snapshot provided by a biopsy. In this report, we describe a 68-year-old female with an initial diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (a pancreas head mass with multiple bilateral lung nodules). Mutation profiling of the pancreatic mass biopsy using a comprehensive cancer next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel was unsuccessful due to insufficient tissue. Consequently, ctDNA testing using a pan-cancer NGS panel was performed, and an EGFR p.L858R variant at 2.15% was identified. Interestingly, this activating variant is highly specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which raised the possibility of a synchronous tumor unrelated to the pancreatic mass. Immunohistochemistry showed the EGFR variant in station 7 lymph nodes but not in pancreatic biopsy tissue, supporting the inference that the variant originated from the lung mass. Droplet digital PCR on the limited pancreatic biopsy identified a KRAS p.Q61 variant, which was absent by ctDNA testing, suggesting a pancreatic primary with low ctDNA levels. In addition to diagnosing a primary lung cancer, ctDNA testing guided treatment decisions. With a primary EGFR p.L858R-mutant NSCLC, osimertinib was administered, resulting in a partial response within 10 months. In addition, given the synchronous primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma, germline testing was performed, revealing a CDKN2A p.I49T variant consistent with melanoma-pancreatic cancer syndrome, prompting comprehensive cancer surveillance and familial testing. This case illustrates how ctDNA testing enabled a comprehensive evaluation by clarifying the diagnosis, identifying actionable biomarkers, and facilitating genetic risk assessment, ultimately having a significant impact on the patient's clinical management.

Humans

CD40 transcriptomic expression patterns across malignancies: implications for clinical trials of CD40 agonists.

BACKGROUND: CD40 is a T-cell co-stimulatory receptor targeted by next-generation immunotherapies. We conducted a pan-cancer transcriptome analysis of CD40, its ligand, and related immune markers to evaluate co-expression patterns and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed transcriptome data for CD40, its ligand, and other common checkpoints and co-stimulators (PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA-4, LAG-3, ICOS, CD27, CD28, OX40, and GITR). RNA expression was classified as high (75-100th percentile), moderate (25-74th), or low (0-24th) against a reference population of 735 previously tested solid tumors. RESULTS: Of 514 patients, 114 (22%) showed high, 247 (48%) moderate, and 153 (30%) low CD40 RNA expression. High CD40 expression was most frequent in liver and bile duct (42%), pancreatic (42%), and ovarian (40%) cancers. Both high CD40 and low-moderate CD40 ligand expression-potentially conducive to CD40 agonist therapy-was most frequent in ovarian (33%) and pancreatic (24%) cancer. In both UCSD (N = 514) and TCGA (N = 10,953) cohorts, high CD40 expression significantly correlated with high CD28 and GITR. High CD40 RNA levels were not prognostic for overall survival (OS) from metastatic disease (P = 0.2) (n = 272 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-naïve patients). High CD40 expression correlated with longer OS from immunotherapy initiation (n = 217 ICI-treated patients; P = 0.04, univariable analysis), but not multivariable analysis, suggesting it may not be an independent predictive biomarker. CONCLUSION: High CD40 expression correlated with liver and bile duct, pancreatic, and ovarian cancers, as well as with CD28 and GITR transcripts. Immune marker co-expression in individual patients merits further exploration for the development of CD40-based and other immunotherapy interventions.

Humans

Biomarker Analysis from Patients with Metastatic PDAC Treated with TGFβ Antibody NIS793 plus Abraxane + Gemcitabine versus Abraxane + Gemcitabine Alone in a Phase II, Open-Label, Randomized Study.

PURPOSE: Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) plays a dual role in cancer, acting as a tumor suppressor early in the disease but promoting progression and immune evasion when dysregulated. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), TGFβ-driven desmoplasia fosters chemoresistance and immunosuppression, limiting therapeutic efficacy. NIS793, a fully human mAb targeting TGFβ, demonstrated antifibrotic and immunomodulatory activity in preclinical models and early-phase trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized, open-label, phase II study in treatment-naïve patients with metastatic PDAC (mPDAC) to evaluate NIS793 ± spartalizumab (anti-PD-1) combined with nab-paclitaxel (or Abraxane)/gemcitabine (ABRA/GEM) versus ABRA/GEM alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), safety, pharmacokinetics, and biomarker analyses. Exploratory assessments included paired tumor RNA sequencing, cell-free DNA profiling, and plasma proteomics. RESULTS: NIS793 demonstrated target engagement and suppression of TGFβ signaling, confirmed by transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Stromal remodeling was evident, with significant downregulation of cancer-associated fibroblast markers (Acta2, Fap) and collagen-related signatures. Despite proof of mechanism, clinical efficacy was not observed: Median PFS and OS were comparable or numerically worse in the NIS793 arm versus control (HR for OS in NIS793 + ABRA/GEM vs. ABRA/GEM: 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-2.07). The safety profile was manageable, with no unexpected toxicities. Biomarker data revealed increased expression of neutrophil-related genes after treatment, suggesting potential induction of tumor-promoting inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: NIS793 effectively inhibited TGFβ signaling and led to stromal remodeling but failed to improve outcomes in mPDAC. These findings highlight the complexity of TGFβ biology and caution against its blockade in combination with chemotherapy for PDAC. Future strategies should consider context-dependent effects of TGFβ inhibition.

Humans

Prostate Cancer, Genetic Susceptibility, and Risk of Chronic Non-Urological Complications.

BACKGROUND: Chronic nonurological complications are common among prostate cancer (PCa) survivors; however, their spectrum, magnitude, and genetic contribution remain poorly characterized. METHODS: We evaluated 15 commonly reported nonurological complications and tested their associations with exposure to PCa and disease-specific polygenic risk scores (PRS) in the UK Biobank (UKB; N&#x2009;=&#x2009;219,133). Analyses were conducted using cause-specific Cox proportional-hazards models within a full-cohort framework with time-updated PCa status, delayed entry at study recruitment, and age as the underlying time scale. RESULTS: After recruitment, incident PCa was diagnosed in 13,780 men, of which 1,656 (12.02%) had metastatic PCa (mPCa). Risks for seven complications were higher among men with PCa, adjusting for genetic background (all p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05), including osteoporosis, venous thromboembolism, depression, and four primary cancers (bladder, kidney, colorectal, and pancreatic). Risks were consistently stronger among men exposed to mPCa than non-mPCa; for example, the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval) for osteoporosis was 1.88 (1.63-2.18) for any PCa, 4.67 (3.11-7.01) for mPCa, and 1.75 (1.50-2.04) for non-mPCa. Elevated risks for three additional complications (coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) were observed only among men with mPCa. The risks for these ten complications were further increased among men with higher disease-specific PRS; for example, the HR for osteoperosis in mPCa patients in the top PRS quartile was 13.57 (8.24-22.34) compared with men without PCa (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). CONCLUSION: PCa diagnosis and inherited genetic susceptibility jointly contribute to increased risks of multiple chronic non-urological complications among survivors.

Humans

UGT1A1 genotype testing for irinotecan: A guideline developed by the UK Centre of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation in Pharmacogenomics (CERSI-PGx).

Irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is available as both non-pegylated and pegylated formulations. The non-pegylated formulation is licensed for use in advanced colorectal cancer either in combination with other agents or as monotherapy. However, it is also used off-label across a range of gastrointestinal malignancies and in rare malignancies such as glioblastoma and sarcomas. The pegylated formulation is licensed for use as combination therapy in adult patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Irinotecan is hydrolysed to its active metabolite, SN-38, which is predominantly inactivated by the enzyme uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A1. UGT1A1 is encoded by the gene UGT1A1, which is polymorphically expressed, with allele frequencies varying across populations. Poor metabolizers carry two variants that reduce UGT1A1 enzyme expression or activity, leading to increased risk of irinotecan toxicity. Any patient who is about to be prescribed irinotecan for an epithelial malignancy should have pharmacogenetic testing, to identify clinically relevant UGT1A1 variants, where testing is available. Irinotecan dose should be reduced by 30% at Cycle 1 treatment in poor metabolizers for all indications, with doses titrated thereafter based on tolerability and neutrophil counts. The lack of evidence precludes us from making any recommendation for rare malignancies such as sarcomas. Our guideline is consistent with other international pharmacogenetics prescribing guidelines. This guideline is grounded in the latest evidence but cannot account for all individual factors relevant to patient care. Therefore, prescribers must conduct a thorough assessment of each patient's risk-benefit profile, ensuring that therapy is optimized to maximize benefits while minimizing potential harms.

Humans

Pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 and endocrine cancers: an up-to-date review through history, current insights and future perspectives.

Pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 (PTTG1), discovered in 1997 by Pei and Melmed, takes part in cellular replication, cell cycle control, DNA repair mechanisms, organogenesis, metabolism regulation, cellular transformation, and senescence. Its biological actions include protein-protein interactions, modulation of gene transcription, and other than intracellular and autocrine mechanisms, even paracrine activities. For the reasons mentioned above, PTTG1 stands out as a multifaceted regulator of cancer biology; it is involved in genomic and chromosomal instability, local invasiveness, neo-lymphangiogenesis, and metastatic spreading. In solid neoplasms, endocrine neoplasms, although deemed rare, have experienced a significant increase in diagnostic incidence in recent years. Endocrine cancers are still a major challenge in healthcare and research since several questions remain unanswered, even though researchers have made considerable efforts to uncover their causes. Twenty-seven years have passed since PTTG1's discovery, and several works have been published. However, only the tip of the iceberg has been unveiled. Herein, we review current knowledge of PTTG1's action in endocrine cancers, such as pituitary, thyroid, testicular, adrenal, pancreatic, and ovarian.

Humans

Lynch Syndrome

CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS: Lynch syndrome is characterized by an increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) and cancers of the endometrium, ovary, stomach, small bowel, urinary tract, biliary tract, prostate, brain (usually glioblastoma), skin (sebaceous adenomas, sebaceous epithelioma, sebaceous carcinomas, and keratoacanthomas), and pancreas. Cancer risks and age of onset vary depending on the associated gene. Several other cancer types have been reported to occur in individuals with Lynch syndrome (e.g., sarcomas, adrenocortical carcinoma). However, the data are not sufficient to demonstrate that the risk of developing these cancers is increased in individuals with Lynch syndrome. DIAGNOSIS/TESTING: The diagnosis of Lynch syndrome is established in a proband with a germline heterozygous pathogenic variant in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 or a 3' EPCAM deletion identified by molecular genetic testing, or, rarely, constitutional inactivation of the MLH1 promotor due to methylation identified by DNA methylation analysis. MANAGEMENT: Treatment of manifestations: Polypectomy at the time of colonoscopy; referral to advanced endoscopist for lesions requiring advanced resection techniques; surgical resection of polyps when needed; individualized surgical management for colon cancer based on tumor location, stage, Lynch syndrome-associated gene, age, comorbidity, bowel function, anticipated quality of life, and risk of metachronous CRC; mismatch repair (MMR) testing, microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, and multidisciplinary evaluation for rectal cancer prior to treatment; consider immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic or unresectable MMR-deficient or MSI-high tumors; other tumors are managed as in the general population. Prevention of primary manifestations: Risk-reducing hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy can be considered after childbearing is completed. Prophylactic colectomy prior to the development of colon cancer is generally not recommended for individuals known to have Lynch syndrome because screening colonoscopy with polypectomy is an effective preventive measure. Aspirin therapy has been shown to decrease the risk for CRC in individuals with Lynch syndrome. Surveillance: Colonoscopy with removal of precancerous polyps with frequency and initial screening based on gene involved and family history; annual education for females regarding the symptoms of endometrial and ovarian cancers; consider transvaginal ultrasound examination and endometrial biopsy every one to two years beginning at age 30 to 35 years; consider upper endoscopy examination particularly for individuals with a family history of gastric cancer and those of Asian ancestry with frequency and initial screening based on gene involved and family history; biopsies should be evaluated for H pylori infections so that appropriate treatment can be given as needed; consider capsule endoscopy and small bowel enterography for distal small bowel cancers in symptomatic persons; consider urinalysis with urine cytology annually beginning between ages 30 and 35 years; consider pancreatic cancer screening in individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer; follow population screening guidelines and maintain awareness for signs and symptoms of other cancers. Agents/circumstances to avoid: Obesity, physical inactivity, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and type 2 diabetes may increase CRC risk in individuals with Lynch syndrome. Evaluation of relatives at risk: Molecular genetic testing for the familial Lynch syndrome-related pathogenic variant is recommended for all first-degree relatives (parents, sibs, and offspring) of an affected individual in order to identify as early as possible those who would benefit from surveillance, risk-reducing interventions, and other preventive measures. Testing for constitutional MLH1 hypermethylation is recommended for all first-degree relatives of individuals with Lynch syndrome caused by constitutional MLH1 methylation. GENETIC COUNSELING: Lynch syndrome caused by a heterozygous germline Lynch syndrome-related pathogenic variant (i.e., a pathogenic variant in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 or a 3' EPCAM deletion) is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Individuals with Lynch syndrome caused by constitutional inactivation of MLH1 by methylation typically represent simplex cases, although affected individuals from a few families have been reported with inherited MLH1 promoter methylation. The majority of individuals with a heterozygous germline Lynch syndrome-related pathogenic variant inherited the pathogenic variant from a parent who may or may not have had cancer. Each child of an individual with Lynch syndrome has a 50% chance of inheriting the Lynch syndrome-related pathogenic variant and the related cancer risks. If the reproductive partner of an individual with Lynch syndrome has a germline heterozygous pathogenic variant in the same Lynch syndrome-related gene, offspring are at risk of inheriting biallelic pathogenic variants and having constitutional mismatch repair deficiency. Once a germline Lynch syndrome-related pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, predictive testing for at-risk asymptomatic family members and prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC)