Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Mesylates”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Imatinib mesylate-sensitive blast crisis immediately after discontinuation of imatinib mesylate therapy in chronic myelogenous leukemia: report of two cases.

Although imatinib mesylate has shown encouraging activity in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), disease progression during therapy has been observed, manifested by clonal expansion of imatinib mesylate-resistant leukemia cells. On the other hand, myelosuppression related to treatment of imatinib mesylate is often managed with temporary interruption of treatment or dose reduction. We here report two CML patients who had imatinib mesylate-sensitive blast crisis (BC) immediately after discontinuation of imatinib mesylate therapy. The patients discontinued therapy because of neutropenia. Although there was no evidence of blastic phase during therapy, BC occurred 2 weeks after the withdrawal of treatment in both cases. Interestingly, additional chromosomal abnormalities were detected following the withdrawal of imatinib mesylate and disappeared by re-introduction of this agent. The same doses of imatinib mesylate was still effective and remission was sustained with imatinib mesylate alone again. Our report suggests the possibility that withdrawal of imatinib mesylate may lead to proliferation of blast clones even in patients showing good responses to imatinib mesylate without signs of disease progression.

Aged↗

Residues of genotoxic alkyl mesylates in mesylate salt drug substances: real or imaginary problems?

Mesylate esters of short-chain (n = 1-3) alcohols are reactive, direct-acting, genotoxic and possibly carcinogenic alkylating agents. Their chemical and biological properties appear to correlate well with Swain-Scott s constants; for example, high S(N)1 character (low s value) is associated with enhanced carcinogenic potential, but also a rapid hydrolysis rate. Concerns over the possible formation of such esters during the preparation of mesylate salt drug substances, by addition of methane sulfonic acid (MSA) to the free base dissolved in an alcoholic solvent, have led regulatory agencies to require applicants to demonstrate that the synthetic method employed does not lead to the presence of detectable levels of alkyl mesylates. Mechanistic considerations, relating mainly to the extremely low nucleophilicity of the mesylate anion, and experimental data, both indicate that alkyl mesylates should not be formed (except from MSA impurities) during mesylate salt synthesis. Mechanistic arguments also predict that residues of alkyl halides (possibly formed in the preparation of amine hydrochlorides or hydrobromides) could represent a similar or greater potential hazard than alkyl mesylates. The perceived risk of alkyl mesylate formation seems to rely on mistaken assumptions and so the concerns appear unjustified. Further reassurance could be achieved however by applying a variety of strategies during synthesis, including pH control, and use of high-purity MSA or of a non-hydroxylic reaction solvent.

Alkylating Agents↗

Synergistic interactions between imatinib mesylate and the novel phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 inhibitor OSU-03012 in overcoming imatinib mesylate resistance.

Resistance to the Ableson protein tyrosine (Abl) kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate has become a critical issue for patients in advanced phases of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Imatinib-resistant tumor cells develop, in part, as a result of point mutations within the Abl kinase domain. As protein kinase B (Akt) plays a pivotal role in Abl oncogene-mediated cell survival, we hypothesize that concurrent inhibition of Akt will sensitize resistant cells to the residual apoptotic activity of imatinib mesylate, thereby overcoming the resistance. Here, we examined the effect of OSU-03012, a celecoxib-derived phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (PDK-1) inhibitor, on imatinib mesylate-induced apoptosis in 2 clinically relevant breakpoint cluster region (Bcr)-Abl mutant cell lines, Ba/F3p210(E255K) and Ba/F3p210(T315I). The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of imatinib mesylate to inhibit the proliferation of Ba/F3p210(E255K) and Ba/F3p210(T315I) were 14 +/- 4 and 30 +/- 2 microM, respectively. There was no cross-resistance to OSU-03012 in these mutant cells with an IC50 of 5 microM irrespective of mutations. Nevertheless, in the presence of OSU-03012 the susceptibility of these mutant cells to imatinib-induced apoptosis was significantly enhanced. This synergistic action was, at least in part, mediated through the concerted effect on phospho-Akt. Together these data provide a novel therapeutic strategy to overcome imatinib mesylate resistance, especially with the Abl mutant T315I.

3-Phosphoinositide-Dependent Protein Kinases↗

Cotreatment with vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) enhances activity of dasatinib (BMS-354825) against imatinib mesylate-sensitive or imatinib mesylate-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.

PURPOSE: We determined the effects of vorinostat [suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA)] and/or dasatinib, a dual Abl/Src kinase (tyrosine kinase) inhibitor, on the cultured human (K562 and LAMA-84) or primary chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cells, as well as on the murine pro-B BaF3 cells with ectopic expression of the unmutated and kinase domain-mutant forms of Bcr-Abl. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Following exposure to dasatinib and/or vorinostat, apoptosis, loss of clonogenic survival, as well as the activity and levels of Bcr-Abl and its downstream signaling proteins were determined. RESULTS: Treatment with dasatinib attenuated the levels of autophosphorylated Bcr-Abl, p-CrkL, phospho-signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (p-STAT5), p-c-Src, and p-Lyn; inhibited the activity of Lyn and c-Src; and induced apoptosis of the cultured CML cells. Combined treatment of cultured human CML and BaF3 cells with vorinostat and dasatinib induced more apoptosis than either agent alone, as well as synergistically induced loss of clonogenic survival, which was associated with greater depletion of Bcr-Abl, p-CrkL, and p-STAT5 levels. Cotreatment with dasatinib and vorinostat also attenuated the levels of Bcr-AblE255K and Bcr-AblT315I and induced apoptosis of BaF3 cells with ectopic expression of the mutant forms of Bcr-Abl. Finally, cotreatment of the primary CML cells with vorinostat and dasatinib induced more loss of cell viability and depleted Bcr-Abl or Bcr-AblT315I, p-STAT5, and p-CrkL levels than either agent alone. CONCLUSIONS: As shown here, the preclinical in vitro activity of vorinostat and dasatinib against cultured and primary CML cells supports the in vivo testing of the combination in imatinib mesylate-sensitive and imatinib mesylate-resistant CML cells.

Animals↗

Preparation of methyl 2,3-di-O-mesyl-4,6-thioanhydro-alpha-D-galactopyranoside and methyl 2-O-mesyl-4,6-thioanhydro-alpha-D-gulopyranoside.

Two 2-oxa-7-thiabicyclo[4.2.0]octane derivatives, 4 and 10, with the D-galacto and D-gulo configuration, respectively, were obtained from methyl alpha-D-glucopyranoside. The thietane cyclization involved a thio-Mitsunobu reaction resulting in a 6-thioacetate, which underwent selective base-catalyzed intramolecular nucleophilic substitution at a C-4 mesylate. The structures of 4 and 10 were elucidated by X-ray diffraction analysis.

Acetates↗

Modern diagnostics in chronic myeloproliferative diseases (CMPDs).

According to the new WHO classification a group of chronic myeloproliferative diseases (CMPDs) were defined: chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL), chronic eosinophilic leukemia and hypereosinophilic syndrome (CEL/HES), polycythemia vera (PV), chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis (with extramedullary hematopoiesis, CIMF), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and so called CMPD/unclassifiable. As clinical features and laboratory findings differ widely between these diseases several diagnostic approaches are mandatory at diagnosis for classification and are needed also for follow up studies, especially for the measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD). We here outline the laboratory set up at diagnosis and during follow up in CMPDs with specific focus on the respective therapeutical consequences. Only by using a comprehensive diagnostic panel including cytomorphology, cytogenetics, and molecular genetic methods establishing the correct diagnosis, optimizing treatment as well as evaluating treatment response is possible in CMPDs today.

Blood Cell Count↗

Imatinib mesylate and dermatology part 2: a review of the cutaneous side effects of imatinib mesylate.

Cutaneous reactions to imatinib are common and occur in 9.5% to 69% of patients depending on the series reported. Maculopapular eruptions, erythematous eruptions, edema, and periorbital edema are the most common adverse events observed. Imatinib can also induce severe skin eruptions and generalized skin eruptions. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens Johnson syndrome has been linked to the use of imatinib. Imatinib has caused acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Purpuric vasculitis and mycosis fungoides-like reactions has occurred after imatinib use. Rarer side effects include: hypopigmentation, lichenoid reactions, pityriasiform eruptions, pityriasis rosea, psoriasis, reactivation or induction of porphyria cutanea tarda, neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis, Sweet's syndrome, erythema nodosum, EBV-positive cutaneous B-cell lymphoproliferative disease, possible induction of squamous cell, hyaline cell syringomas, follicular mucinosis, pseudolymphoma-type drug eruptions, and malpighian epitheliomas. Most cutaneous eruptions caused by imatinib do not necessitate discontinuance of imatinib and are usually self limited, despite continued treatment. Administration of oral or topical corticosteroids can ameliorate some of imatinib's cutaneous side effects.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting with single intravenous doses of dolasetron mesylate: a multicenter trial. Dolasetron Mesylate PONV Treatment Study Group.

UNLABELLED: This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of four intravenous (I.V.) doses of dolasetron, an investigational 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) after outpatient surgery under general anesthesia. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial compared the antiemetic efficacy of 12.5, 25, 50, or 100 mg I.V. dolasetron with placebo over 24 h using complete response (no emetic episodes and no rescue medication), time to first emetic episode or rescue medication, and patient nausea and satisfaction with antiemetic therapy as rated by visual analog scale (VAS). Of 1557 patients enrolled, 620 patients were eligible for treatment. Complete response rates for all dolasetron doses--12.5 mg (35%), 25 mg (28%), 50 mg (29%), and 100 mg (29%)--were significantly more effective than placebo (11%, P < 0.05). There was a significant gender interaction for complete response (P < 0.01). Of the patients in the 25-mg and 100-mg dose groups, 12% and 13%, respectively, experienced no nausea (VAS score < 5 mm) versus 5% in the placebo group (P < 0.05). There were no clinically relevant changes in vital signs or laboratory values and no trends with dose for adverse events. Dolasetron is effective for treating PONV and has an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. The 12.5-mg dose was as effective as larger doses for complete response. IMPLICATIONS: Nausea and vomiting are common problems for postsurgical patients. In this study of 620 patients undergoing surgery, a 12.5-mg dose of intravenous dolasetron, a new serotonin-receptor blocker, was significantly more effective than placebo in treating established postoperative nausea and vomiting. Dolasetron 12.5 mg was as safe as placebo.

Adult↗

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Drug Approval Summary: conversion of imatinib mesylate (STI571; Gleevec) tablets from accelerated approval to full approval.

UNLABELLED: Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Novartis Pharmaceuticals East Manruer, NJ) received accelerated approval on May 10, 2001 for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in (a) chronic phase after failure of IFN-alpha therapy, (b) accelerated phase, and (c) blast crisis. The accelerated approval was accompanied by a postmarketing commitment by Novartis Pharmaceuticals to continue patient follow-up to determine duration of treatment response and survival. The present review, based on a safety and efficacy report submitted on December 20, 2002, summarizes data applicable to the conversion of these three CML indications to full approval status. RESULTS: Chronic phase CML: Five hundred thirty-two chronic phase CML patients who had not benefited from prior IFN therapy were treated at a starting imatinib mesylate dose of 400 mg p.o. qd; dose escalation to 800 mg p.o. qd was allowed. Patients had received a median of 14 months of IFN therapy at doses > or =25 million IU/wk and were all in late chronic phase, with a median time from diagnosis of 32 months. Median duration of imatinib mesylate treatment was 29 months, with 81% of patients treated for > or =24 months (maximum 31.5 months). Initial favorable treatment responses were sustained. An estimated 87.8% of patients who had a major cytogenetic response maintained their response 2 years after their initial response. After 2 years of treatment, an estimated 85.4% of patients were free of progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis, and the estimated overall survival was 90.8% (95% confidence interval, 88.3-93.2). Accelerated phase CML: Patients enrolled totaled 293: 235 with CML accelerated phase, 48 with relapsed/refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia, 2 with relapsed/refractory acute myelocytic leukemia, and 8 with relapsed/refractory CML in lymphoid blast crisis. Patients received imatinib mesylate 400 or 600 mg p.o. qd. Dose escalation was permitted, to a maximum of 800 mg/d, taken as 400 mg bid. Efficacy results were improved in patients receiving imatinib mesylate 600 mg qd versus patients receiving 400 mg qd. The median duration of hematologic response was 29 versus 17 months and the estimated 24-month maintained hematologic response rate was 61% versus 42%. The median survival of patients treated with imatinib mesylate 600 mg qd was not reached versus 20.9 months for patients receiving 400 mg qd. Estimated 24-month survival rate was 66% versus 46%. The median survival in the advanced leukemia population (acute lymphocytic leukemia, acute myelocytic leukemia, and lymphoid blast crisis) was only 5 months, and only two patients are still on treatment. Blast crisis CML: A total of 260 patients were recruited. The imatinib mesylate dose was initially 400 mg qd (37 patients) but was subsequently increased to 600 mg qd (223 patients). Patients receiving imatinib mesylate 600 mg qd had a higher hematologic response rate than did patients receiving 400 mg (33% versus 16%). Major cytogenetic responses occurred in 15% of the 260 study patients. The overall median survival was 6.9 months: 7.1 months for patients treated with imatinib mesylate 600 mg and 4.7 months for patients receiving imatinib mesylate 400 mg. Estimated 12-month survival rate for all study patients was 32.1% and estimated 24-month survival rate was 18.3%. SAFETY: Imatinib mesylate was generally well tolerated, but relatively frequent reports of common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were encountered. The most frequently reported adverse events included gastrointestinal disturbances, edema, rash, and musculoskeletal complaints. These rarely led to discontinuation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm those of the interim analysis and suggest that imatinib mesylate represents an effective therapeutic agent for the treatment of patients with CML in chronic phase after failure of IFN-alpha therapy, in blast crisis, and in accelerated phase.

Adolescent↗

Imatinib mesylate treatment in two patients with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To report 2 clinical cases of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) refractory to standard therapy and the variable responses to imatinib mesylate, and to review previously reported cases of imatinib mesylate use in the treatment of hypereosinophilia. case summaries: Two male patients were diagnosed with idiopathic HES complicated with organ involvement. Both were treated with imatinib mesylate after failing to respond to or being unable to tolerate standard therapy. In one patient, treatment with imatinib mesylate 100 mg/day produced resolution of symptoms and peripheral blood cell counts within 6 days. The patient has successfully maintained normal blood cell counts and has been without symptoms for more than one year after starting imatinib mesylate. The other patient failed to respond to imatinib mesylate even at the maximum dose (up to 400 mg/day). DISCUSSION: Imatinib mesylate was considered an appropriate alternative for standard therapy of HES based on the evidence that other treatments used for chronic myelogenous leukemia have also been successful in treating HES. Three small studies have supported this hypothesis. However, not all patients with HES respond to imatinib mesylate therapy. The cases presented here illustrate the marked difference. CONCLUSIONS: Imatinib mesylate has shown some promise in the treatment of HES. However, until the etiology of idiopathic hypereosinophilia and the role of imatinib mesylate in the resolution of this disease are determined, it will continue to be difficult to predict the responsiveness of a patient to imatinib mesylate therapy.

Adult↗

Genetic changes in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients during imatinib mesylate treatment.

PURPOSE: Imatinib mesylate showed a sustained objective response in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) since its introduction in 2001. Here we reported genetic changes during imatinib mesylate treatment especially when the patient had partial response or stationary disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and June 2005, 44 advanced GIST patients were treated with imatinib mesylate. Among them, five patients (11.9%) (four with partial response and one with stationary disease) received surgical treatment during imatinib mesylate treatment. We compared the genetic status of each tumor in the five patients before and after imatinib mesylate treatment. RESULTS: Symptomatic gallbladder stone with or without cholecystitis (two patients), lower GI bleeding (one patient), upper GI bleeding (one patient), and enterocutaneous fistula (one patient) comprised the indications for operation. Before imatinib mesylate treatment, four of the five patients displayed deletion mutation and one patient displayed point mutation in exon 11. After treatment, one patient developed second novel missense mutation in exon 17 with acquired resistance since he was administered with only half dose of imatinib mesylate. The other four patients taking the same dose of imatinib mesylate exhibited identical mutation to the previous lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Necrosis of large and bulky tumors after imatinib mesylate therapy might be the reason of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and enterocutaneous fistula requiring surgical intervention. Imatinib mesylate could induce acquired resistance during treatment and second novel mutation might be the reason.

Adult↗

Acute renal failure secondary to imatinib mesylate treatment in prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of acute renal failure associated with the administration of imatinib mesylate. CASE SUMMARY: A 64-year-old man diagnosed with prostate cancer was enrolled in a Phase I trial of imatinib mesylate plus taxotere on a protocol that required a run-in period of imatinib mesylate alone. During therapy with imatinib mesylate, the patient developed acute renal failure, requiring hemodialysis. A renal biopsy revealed tubular vacuolization. Renal failure resolved with cessation of imatinib mesylate. DISCUSSION: Imatinib mesylate is a protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, the receptor tyrosine kinases for platelet-derived growth factor, and stem cell factor c-kit. Prostate cancer has been identified as a target for therapy with imatinib mesylate. This patient had no other confounding factors for the cause of the renal failure. An objective causality assessment determined that imatinib mesylate was the probable cause of the acute renal failure. The presence of a primary glomerular disease was excluded by biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Imatinib mesylate-induced acute renal failure has now been linked to toxic effects on renal tubular cells in 3 cases. Renal function should be closely monitored during imatinib mesylate therapy.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

Spotlight on imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukemia.

UNLABELLED: Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Glivec) is an orally administered competitive inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase created by the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In patients with newly diagnosed and previously untreated (apart from hydroxyurea and/or anagrelide) CML in the chronic phase, imatinib mesylate 400 mg/day, compared with interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) plus cytarabine, resulted in higher hematologic response (HR) and cytogenetic response (CR) rates and fewer patients progressing to the accelerated phase or blast crisis in a large comparative trial. Preliminary results indicate that, compared with IFNalpha plus cytarabine, imatinib mesylate treatment was associated with similar total costs, but resulted in a higher health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Imatinib mesylate was also effective in patients with chronic-phase CML refractory to or intolerant of treatment with IFNalpha (as 400 mg/day) and in those with blast-crisis or accelerated-phase CML (600 mg/day). In the latter groups, HR and CR rates were lower than those in patients with chronic-phase CML. Imatinib mesylate-associated adverse events were common in clinical trials, but were mostly mild to moderate in severity. The most frequently reported adverse events were superficial edema, nausea, muscle cramps, diarrhea, vomiting, and skin rash. Myelosuppression (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia) was also reported, especially in patients with advanced disease. In patients with previously untreated chronic-phase CML, serious adverse events (both hematologic and nonhematologic) were less common with imatinib mesylate than with IFNalpha plus cytarabine treatment. CONCLUSION: Imatinib mesylate is a valuable therapy for patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic-phase CML. It is better tolerated and produces higher HR, CR and freedom from progressive disease rates than conventional therapy with IFNalpha plus cytarabine. Preliminary results indicate that, compared with IFNalpha plus cytarabine, imatinib mesylate treatment was associated with similar total costs, but resulted in a higher HR-QOL. Imatinib mesylate is also effective in patients with accelerated-phase and blast-crisis CML, and patients with chronic-phase CML who have failed IFNalpha therapy. Given its efficacy and generally manageable adverse event profile, imatinib mesylate offers an important early treatment option for patients with CML.

Administration, Oral↗

Imatinib mesylate reduces production of extracellular matrix and prevents development of experimental dermal fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: Imatinib mesylate is a clinically well-tolerated small molecule inhibitor that exerts selective, dual inhibition of the transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) pathways. This study was undertaken to test the potential use of imatinib mesylate as an antifibrotic drug for the treatment of dermal fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: The expression of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins in SSc and normal dermal fibroblasts was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and Sircol collagen assay. Proliferation capacity was assessed with the MTT assay. Cell viability was analyzed by mitochondrial membrane potential and by annexin V/propidium iodide staining. Bleomycin-induced experimental dermal fibrosis was used to assess the antifibrotic effects of imatinib mesylate in vivo. RESULTS: Imatinib mesylate efficiently reduced basal synthesis of COL1A1, COL1A2, and fibronectin 1 messenger RNA in SSc and normal dermal fibroblasts, in a dose-dependent manner. The induction of ECM proteins after stimulation with TGFbeta and PDGF was also strongly and dose-dependently inhibited by imatinib mesylate. These results were confirmed at the protein level. Imatinib mesylate did not alter proliferation or induce apoptosis and necrosis in dermal fibroblasts. Consistent with the in vitro findings, imatinib mesylate reduced dermal thickness, the number of myofibroblasts, and synthesis of ECM proteins in experimental dermal fibrosis, without evidence of toxic side effects. CONCLUSION: These data show that imatinib mesylate at biologically relevant concentrations has potent antifibrotic effects in vitro and in vivo, without toxic side effects. Considering its favorable pharmacokinetics and clinical experience with its use in other diseases, imatinib mesylate is a promising candidate for the treatment of fibrotic diseases such as SSc.

Aged↗

c-KIT-expressing Ewing tumour cells are insensitive to imatinib mesylate (STI571).

PURPOSE: In order to determine whether Ewing tumour patients may be potential candidates for imatinib mesylate therapy, we analysed the expression of the currently known imatinib mesylate-sensitive tyrosine kinases and tested sensitivity to imatinib mesylate in a panel of eight Ewing tumour cell lines in vitro. METHODS: Expression of the different tyrosine kinases was assessed by flow cytometry and RT-PCR. Sensitivity to imatinib mesylate was analysed using a standard MTT proliferation assay. RESULTS: Flow cytometric and RT-PCR analyses in a panel of eight Ewing tumour cell lines demonstrated expression of several imatinib mesylate-sensitive tyrosine kinases, including c-KIT, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, c-ABL and c-ARG. However, in the MTT proliferation assay, all eight Ewing tumour cell lines were found to be resistant to imatinib mesylate at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 10 micro M. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the expression of imatinib mesylate-sensitive tyrosine kinases, Ewing tumour cells proved resistant to imatinib mesylate in vitro. This observation has implications for the selection of patients for experimental therapy with imatinib mesylate.

Antineoplastic Agents↗