Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Mesna”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Liquid chromatographic analysis of mesna and dimesna in plasma and urine of patients treated with mesna.

We describe in this report an expedient and accurate liquid chromatographic method for measurement of mesna and dimesna in plasma and urine. The separation of mesna and the internal standard (p-aminobenzoic acid, IS) was achieved on a 10-microns, 8 mm (i.d.) x 10-cm C18-Resolve cartridge in conjunction with radial compression system. An aqueous solution of sodium citrate (0.1 M), tetrabutyl ammonium phosphate (0.001 M), and triethylamine (1:10,000, vol/vol), adjusted to pH 5 with 85% phosphoric acid was used at a flow rate of 2 ml/min as a mobile phase. The compounds were detected in the effluent electrochemically at +450 mV. After an appropriate amount of IS was added, the plasma sample (100 microliters or fraction thereof) was deproteinized with an equal volume of 0.0825 M sulfuric acid containing sodium hexametaphosphate (1.25% wt/vol), whereas urine was diluted 1:50 with water and mixed 1:1 with an aqueous solution of sodium hexametaphosphate (1.25% wt/vol). Dimesna was reduced back to mesna with sodium borohydride before analysis of the total mesna. The peak height ratio (drug/IS) varied linearly with the concentration, and the correlation coefficient was > 0.992 for both mesna and dimesna. The intrarun precision at different concentrations of mesna was equally good and the coefficient of variation was consistently < 4.5%. No interference from endogenous substances or any concomitantly used drug was observed. This assay is currently being used for measurement of mesna and dimesna in plasma of bone marrow recipients who receive high doses of cyclophosphamide.

Bone Marrow Transplantation↗
PubMed1997

Urinary excretion of ifosfamide, 4-hydroxyifosfamide, 3- and 2-dechloroethylifosfamide, mesna, and dimesna in patients on fractionated intravenous ifosfamide and concomitant mesna therapy.

The oxazaphosphorine antineoplastic ifosfamide (IF) is metabolized by two different initial pathways: ring oxidation ("activation"), forming 4-OH-IF ("activated IF"), and side-chain oxidation with liberation of chloroacetaldehyde (CAA), forming the inactive metabolites 3-dechloroethylifosfamide or 2-dechloroethylifosfamide (3-DCE-IF, 2-DCE-IF). 4-OH-IF and 4-OH-IF-derived acrolein are thought to be responsible for IF-induced urotoxicity (hemorrhagic cystitis), whereas CAA may be involved in IF-associated nephrotoxicity (renal tubular damage). The thiol compound 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate sodium (mesna) has proved to inactivate sufficiently the urotoxic metabolites of oxazaphosphorine cytostatics and is therefore routinely given to patients receiving IF chemotherapy. The cumulative urinary excretion of IF, 4-OH-IF, 3-DCE-IF, 2-DCE-IF, mesna, and its disulfide dimesna was studied in 11 patients with bronchogenic carcinoma receiving IF on a 5-day divided-dose schedule (1.5 g/m2 daily) with concomitant application of mesna (0.3 g/m2 at 0,4, and 8 h after IF infusion). On day 1 the mean cumulative 24-h urinary recoveries (percentage of the IF dose) recorded for IF, 4-OH-IF, 3-DCE-IF, and 2-DCE-IF were 13.9%, 0.52%, 4.8%, and 1.5%, respectively. On day 5 the corresponding values were 12.2%, 0.74%, 9.9%, and 3.6%, respectively. This time-dependent increase in urinary excretion of IF metabolites, which is caused by rapid autoinduction of hepatic oxidative metabolism, may result in a higher probability for the development of urotoxic and nephrotoxic side effects during prolonged IF application. The mean 24-h urinary recoveries (percentage of the daily mesna dose) recorded for mesna/dimesna on day 1 (day 5) were 23.8%/45.2% (21.2%/39.8%), respectively. The mean molar excess of urinary reduced ("free") mesna over 4-OH-IF ranged from 11 to 72 on day 1 and from 6 to 40 on day 5. This indicates that although urinary excretion of 4-OH-IF rises with repeated IF application, mesna in standard doses should sufficiently inactivate the urotoxic IF metabolites.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

In vitro/in vivo effects of Mesna on the genotoxicity and toxicity of cyclophosphamide--a study aimed at clarifying the mechanism of Mesna's anticarcinogenic activity.

Cyclophosphamide is an effective antitumor agent with considerable side effects such as urotoxicity and carcinogenicity. These negative attributes may be caused by toxic and genotoxic metabolites, respectively. Mesna (sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate) decreases the urotoxicity by scavenging the toxic metabolite acrolein. The present study was aimed at elucidating whether a similar scavenging of genotoxic alkylating intermediates could be found, which might cause the reduction in carcinogenicity. In vitro studies on the genotoxic and toxic properties of cyclophosphamide and its major metabolites to bacteria were therefore performed in the presence of Mesna. Mesna did not reduce the mutagenicity of any of the tested metabolites. Mesna clearly inhibited the toxic properties of acrolein. After in vivo application of Mesna and cyclophosphamide to rats, however, a lower yield of mutagens in the excreted urine was observed than after application of cyclophosphamide only.

Acrolein↗
PubMed1989

Ifosfamide and mesna in the treatment of malignant disease mesna as urothelial protector.

One hundred and forty-six patients with advanced malignant disease were treated with 6 different dosage schedules of ifosfamide (IFX). Mesna was used as urothelial protector. With mesna, urothelial toxicity was moderate, and single doses of up to 7 g/m2 could be administered without intolerable urotoxicity. Leukopenia was the dose-limiting factor in this study. Unexpected pulmonary edema occurred in 3 patients. Therapeutic results were disappointing. A malignancy identified in this study that warrants further investigation with IFX and mesna, is malignant mesothelioma.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Similar bioavailability of single-dose oral and intravenous mesna in the blood and urine of healthy human subjects.

Although mesna has been used for more than a decade to reduce the incidence of hemorrhagic cystitis induced by ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide, the disposition of i.v. and oral mesna has not been adequately described. To obtain accurate bioavailability data for the design of mesna regimens, we developed procedures to preserve and measure mesna and dimesna in the blood and urine and studied 25 volunteer subjects who received single doses of i.v. mesna and four different formulations of oral mesna in a five-way randomized crossover study. The dose-adjusted area under the blood concentration-time curve showed no difference in bioavailability for i.v. and oral mesna; however, the maximum mesna concentration after oral doses was 16% of that estimated for i.v. doses. The short initial half-life of i.v. mesna indicated that mesna was rapidly cleared; however, the blood concentrations of mesna uniformly exceeded those of dimesna after oral as well as i.v. doses, which suggested that reduced mesna and oxidized mesna disulfide are in equilibrium. The ratio of mesna:dimesna was higher in protein-free plasma than it was in the urine, which suggested that most urinary mesna is produced by glomerular filtration of mesna rather than by renal tubular reduction of dimesna. The sum of mesna and dimesna excretion after the i.v. doses (73% of the dose) and the four oral formulations (68-73%) showed no difference in urinary bioavailability, consistent with the blood data. However, the urinary bioavailability of the therapeutically active free-thiol mesna was greater after i.v. doses (40% of the dose) than it was after oral doses (31-33%). The ratio of oral:i.v. mesna excretion ranged from 0.52-1.23 (mean, 0.82) among the 24 subjects. Urinary mesna concentrations exceeded 50 microM in all subjects for up to 12 h after oral doses as compared to 4 h after i.v. doses. About 90% of this mesna was excreted by hour 2 after i.v. doses and by hour 9 after oral doses. The mean maximum concentration of mesna in blood and excretion into urine were both 2.6 h after dosing. The oral formulations thus showed sustained urinary excretion, and their urinary bioavailability approached that of i.v. mesna.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1987

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulphonate (mesna) in normal subjects.

The pharmacokinetics of mesna (sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulphonate) and its inactive disulphide, dimesna, were investigated using high performance liquid chromatography in six normal subjects following intravenous and oral administration of 800 mg mesna. The mean maximum mesna concentration after i.v. administration was 111 (s.d. +/- 28.3) nmol ml-1 and the mean maximum dimesna concentration was 183 (s.d. +/- 41.6) nmol ml-1. Following oral mesna dosing the mean peak mesna concentration was 19.6 (s.d. +/- 10.2) nmol ml-1 but mesna was only found in the plasma of five of the six subjects. The mean peak dimesna concentration was 22.5 (s.d. +/- 12.4) nmol ml-1. Following i.v. mesna administration, the mean half-life of mesna was 21.8 (s.d. +/- 3.1) min and total body clearance 1.23 (s.d. +/- 0.31) l kg-1 h-1. The mean half-life of dimesna was 1.17 (s.d. +/- 0.32) h. It was not possible to determine their half-lives after oral mesna administration. The mean mesna concentration in the 0-4 h urine collection was 9.6 (s.d. +/- 10.7; range 1.4-28.7) nmol ml-1 following i.v. mesna injection. After oral mesna the highest mesna concentration occurred in either the 0-4 or 4-8 h urine collections. The mean peak mesna concentration was 2.5 (s.d. +/- 1.7) mumol ml-1 (c.f. estimated uroprotective concentration of 1.7 mumol ml-1). The mean 4 h urinary clearance of the uroprotective species mesna was 0.413 (s.d. +/- 0.136) l kg-1 h-1. After both i.v. and oral mesna the urinary excretion of mesna is predominantly during the first 4 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Reduction of dimesna to mesna by the isolated perfused rat liver.

Mesna is administered with ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide to reduce the incidence of hemorrhagic cystitis. In the present model of mesna metabolism and disposition, mesna is rapidly and irreversibly oxidized to dimesna in the plasma, passes unchanged through the liver, and is then reduced by the kidney and excreted. Our detection of a high ratio of mesna to dimesna in the plasma of clinical samples led us to reinvestigate the hepatic metabolism of mesna and dimesna. We perfused isolated rat livers from female Sprague Dawley rats with protein-free buffered solution containing dimesna at concentrations observed during therapy. In single-pass perfusions, each liver was perfused with up to three dimesna concentrations during consecutive 20-min periods. Recirculating perfusions were used to study single supratherapeutic concentrations of dimesna or mesna. Mesna and dimesna concentrations were measured by specific chromatographic procedures. Dimesna reduction, adjusted by the effluent flow rate and liver weight (0.4-58.5 nmol/min/g liver), correlated closely by linear regression (r = 0.98; n = 36) to the perfused dimesna concentration (4.2-249 microM), indicating a clearance of 0.20 ml/min/g liver. The concentration of dimesna that entered the liver closely matched the summed concentration of mesna and dimesna emerging in the effluent perfusate (single-pass experiments: slope, 0.98; intercept, -0.30; r = 1.00; n = 31). Only trace amounts of unidentified thiols were detected in the bile during recirculation of perfusates with 1 mM mesna or 250 microM dimesna. The effluent mesna concentration correlated inversely with the flow rate, which was consistent with a low extraction ratio in the perfusion model. These data suggested that the dimesna reduction rate was limited by hepatic uptake. Dimesna reduction was decreased by agents that deplete glutathione. Pretreatment of rats with up to 100 mg/kg ifosfamide did not impair hepatic dimesna reduction. In control experiments, dimesna was not reduced during recirculation through the apparatus without a liver. Mesna was oxidized to dimesna during oxygenation of the perfusate in the reservoir, but mesna injected directly into the perfusate just before entry into the liver passed unchanged into the effluent. Extrapolation of the dimesna clearance data from the perfusion model to humans suggests that hepatic dimesna reduction may counterbalance the rapid oxidation of mesna in plasma. The proposed equilibrium is consistent with clinical observations and suggests a new model for mesna metabolism and disposition.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Oral bioavailability of mesna tablets.

To test the feasibility of uroprotection with sodium 2-mercaptoethane-sulfonate (mesna) in tablet form the bioavailability of mesna tablets was determined in healthy volunteers by HPLC. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of free mesna was significantly lower following oral (110 mumol.l-1 x h-1; 95% CI 98-122) than following i.v. administration of 1.2 g of mesna (201 mumol.l-1 x h-1; 95% CI 158-244). The AUC for total mesna, i.e. dimesna and mixed disulfides, however, were comparable in the two groups, with 628 (539-717) and 772 (713-831) mumol.l-1 x h-1, respectively. The mean residence time was significantly longer following oral mesna, at 79 (76-83) min vs 239 (229-250) min. Following oral mesna 51.1% (46.2-56.0%) of the administered dose was recovered in the urine in 24 h, compared with 60.6 (53.6-67.6)% in 4 h following i.v. mesna, and the average concentration of mesna in the urine exceeded 3 mmol.l-1 for 8 h. The data indicate that mesna in tablet form has an adequate bioavailability for uroprotection and therefore may be preferable to liquid mesna, which has an unpleasant taste. Oral mesna has a longer mean residence time than i.v. mesna, which means that uroprotection can be achieved with longer dosing intervals.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Use of mesna to prevent ifosfamide-induced urotoxicity.

The purpose of this study was to make evidence-based recommendations regarding the mode, dosage and schedule of delivery of concomitant mesna (sodium-2-mercaptoethanesulfonate) to protect against ifosfamide-induced uroepithelial toxicity. A critical review of the literature from 1966 to 1996 was undertaken on mesna administration via the intravenous, oral, or combined modality routes. Outcome measures of urinary symptoms and macrohematuria were emphasized, since these endpoints of urotoxicity are most clinically relevant. The quality of evidence obtained from published clinical research was evaluated based on guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations are now made according to the strength of available evidence on the proper usage of mesna as a protective agent against ifosfamide-induced urotoxicity. There is good evidence that the use of mesna significantly reduces urinary symptoms of dysuria and frequency, as well as the incidences of macrohematuria and microhematuria, when administered concurrently with any dosage of ifosfamide regardless of tumor site. Mesna, given intravenously or orally, is superior to standard prophylaxis with vigorous hydration and alkalinization of urine. A commonly used schedule of intravenous mesna involves a dose equal to 60% of the total ifosfamide dose, divided into three aliquots and administered at 0 h, 4 h and 8 h after ifosfamide. Combined oral and intravenous mesna delivered in some tested schedules is equivalent to intravenous mesna alone, but the optimal schedule and dosage of combined formulation have not yet been established. There is fair indirect but no direct evidence that oral mesna alone is equivalent to intravenous mesna or combined modality use. Further research issues, such as patient compliance with oral mesna and other routes of mesna delivery, are discussed. Ongoing study in the appropriate use of mesna is needed to maximize its value as a uroprotective agent in the clinical setting.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗
PubMed2001

Blood thiols following amifostine and mesna infusions, a pediatric oncology group study.

The Pediatric Oncology Group study for metastatic Ewing's sarcoma used amifostine and mesna with the alkylating agents. To determine the fate of combined drug thiols, we measured thiol levels in plasma, red blood cells (RBC), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of four patients. We also conducted analogous measurements on two patients who received mesna alone and a volunteer's blood following in vitro treatment. Thiols were labeled with monobromobimane, separated on high-pressure liquid chromatography, and detected by fluorescence. Incubation of a volunteer's blood with mesna, WR-1065, or both revealed that cellular uptake of total reducible drug was approximately 10% of plasma level for mesna but approximately 60% for WR-1065. Cellular drugs were mainly the thiol form, whereas half of the plasma drugs were disulfides. Combined incubation with both thiols did not change the extent or form of uptake. WR-1065 and mesna prevented glutathione depletion by 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide. Results from patients were similar. WR-1065 and mesna appeared in the cells by the end of the drug infusions, although WR-1065 uptake was more efficient than mesna. The concentration-time profiles of mesna in RBC paralleled those in plasma. Amifostine administration during mesna infusion caused transient increase in mesna levels. Both agents increased blood cysteine and decreased total reducible cysteine. Mesna alone and mesna plus amifostine prevented cellular glutathione depletion. In conclusion, mesna is imported by RBC and PBMC, but less efficiently than WR-1065. When present at equal levels, these thiols do not influence each other's uptake. Adequate dosing of either drug is necessary for protecting the cells from toxic effects of alkylating agents.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Pharmacokinetics of an intravenous-oral versus intravenous-mesna regimen in lung cancer patients receiving ifosfamide.

PURPOSE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of the approved I.V. (intravenous) mesna regimen and an investigational I.V.-oral regimen that could be used in outpatients who receive ifosfamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The I.V. regimen consisted of three I.V. mesna doses given at 0, 4, and 8 hours after ifosfamide administration. The investigational regimen included an I.V. mesna dose given concurrently with ifosfamide, followed 2 and 8 hours later by oral administration of mesna tablets. I.V. and oral mesna doses equaled 20% and 40%, respectively, of the ifosfamide dose. The study subjects were 12 lung cancer patients who received ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2 daily for 5 days. The patients were randomized to receive either the I.V.-oral or I.V. mesna regimen on day 1, followed by crossover to the other regimen on days 2 through 5 of ifosfamide treatment. The urinary profiles of mesna and dimesna excretion were determined on days 1, 2, and 5; pharmacokinetic parameters for blood samples were determined only on day 5. RESULTS: During the first 12 hours after ifosfamide administration, the amount of mesna excreted and the profile of urinary mesna excretion was similar for both regimens; however, the I.V.-oral regimen showed less fluctuation in the excretion rate and higher trough values. During hours 12 to 24, about eightfold more mesna was excreted by patients given the I.V.-oral than the I.V. regimen. CONCLUSION: These pharmacokinetic data show that the I.V.-oral regimen should be at least as uroprotective as the I.V. mesna regimen. Patients may also benefit from the I.V.-oral regimen because of the higher trough values during hours 0 through 12 and the sustained urinary mesna excretion during hours 12 through 24.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Quantification of BNP7787 (dimesna) and its metabolite mesna in human plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection.

A sensitive and accurate assay was developed and validated to determine BNP7787 (dimesna), a new protector against cisplatin-induced toxicities, and its metabolite mesna in plasma and urine of patients. Both analytes were measured as mesna in deproteinized plasma or in urine diluted with mobile phase using high-performance liquid chromatography with an electrochemical detector provided with a wall-jet gold electrode. The assays for BNP7787 and mesna in deproteinized plasma were linear over the range of 1.6-500 microM and 0.63-320 microM, respectively. In plasma, the mean recovery of BNP7787 over the whole concentration range was 100.6% and of mesna 94.6%. The lower limits of quantitation (LLQs) of BNP7787 and mesna in deproteinized plasma were 1.6 microM and 0.63 microM, respectively. For both compounds the within- and between-day accuracy and precision of the assay was better than 12%. The assays for BNP7787 and mesna in urine were linear over the range of 0.8-1200 microM and 0.63-250 microM, respectively. In urine, the mean recovery of BNP7787 over the whole concentration range was 94.1% and of mesna 93.1%. The LLQ of BNP7787 in urine was 0.8 microM and of mesna 1.6 microM. The within- and between-day accuracy and precision of the assay for BNP7787 and mesna was lower than 15%. The stability of mesna in urine increased with an increasing concentration of mesna, lower temperature and addition of EDTA (1 g/l) and hydrochloric acid (0.2 M). BNP7787 in urine was stable for at least 24 h at temperatures in the range of -20 degrees C up to 37 degrees C and independent of the concentration. The developed assays are currently applied for samples of patients with solid tumors participating in a phase I trial of BNP7787 in combination with cisplatin.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The kinetics and mechanisms of the reaction of Mesna with cisplatin, oxiplatin and carboplatin.

BACKGROUND: Mesna is a sulfohydrate administered as a supportive drug in conjunction with oxazaphosphorines to prevent bladder toxicity from metabolites. When oxazaphosphorines are given simultaneously with platinum drugs, Mesna binds with platinum drugs as well. Previously we showed in cell culture, that Mesna reduces the efficacy of some platinum drugs. Here we elucidate the chemical reaction mechanism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cisplatin, Carboplatin and a novel platinum agent Oxiplatin were incubated with Mesna and the rate of disappearance of Mesna was measured, using an oxidation/reduction reaction between MTT and Mesna. RESULTS: All three platinum agents reacted with Mesna, but the chemical details differed largely. The molar ratios were 3:1, 2:1, and 1:1 for the reactions of Mesna with Oxiplatin, Cisplatin, and Carboplatin, respectively. The speed of the reaction followed a similar pattern, being fastest for Oxiplatin and slowest for Carboplatin. CONCLUSION: When considering the pharmacokinetics of Mesna and these platinum compounds and their reactivity, it appears unlikely that the reaction of Mesna with Carboplatin will become clinically relevant, while Cisplatin, might react with Mesna in patient serum.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Mesna: a novel renoprotective antioxidant in ischaemic acute renal failure.

BACKGROUND: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a key role in renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury. After establishing the in vitro anti-oxidative potential of mesna, a sulfhydryl-containing compound, its effect on kidney function and morphology in a rat model of ischaemic acute renal failure (ARF) was examined. METHODS: Mesna (180 mg/kg) was administered at different time points relative to ischaemia and/or reperfusion onset. Kidney function was assessed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and fractional sodium excretion (FE(Na)) before a 45-min period of unilateral renal artery clamping and following 90 min of reperfusion. Mesna was administered by bolus, 30 min before the induction of ischaemia, 5 min before ischaemia, 5 min before reperfusion, and 5 min after the onset of reperfusion. RESULTS: Mesna improved function of the ischaemic kidney at each administration. When mesna was administered 5 min before the onset of reperfusion, GFR reached 90-100% of its pre ischaemic value and FE(Na) was improved by 75%. The beneficial effect of mesna was also demonstrated by light and electron microscopy. Kidneys treated with mesna 5 min before reperfusion resembled ischaemic non-reperfused kidneys and showed subtle morphological and ultrastructural changes compared with ischaemic-reperfused kidneys. Mesna had no haemodynamic effect on renal blood flow and did not induce any osmotic diuresis. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that mesna acts as an antioxidant. Its antioxidant potential together with optimal protection achieved when administered 5 min before reperfusion, supports the conclusion that mesna scavenges ROS generated at the onset of reperfusion, thus diminishing reperfusion injury and organ damage.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1989

Mesna excretion and ifosfamide nephrotoxicity in children.

To characterize the excretion of 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate sodium (mesna) administered by intermittent infusion, urinary concentrations of mesna and its corresponding inactive disulfide were measured during 50 courses of ifosfamide (1.6 g/m2 for 5 days) and mesna (400 mg/m2 at 0.25, 4, and 6 h after each ifosfamide dose) administered i.v. to 19 patients. Some patients had previously received nephrotoxic therapy that might influence the excretion of mesna and its associated uroprotective effects. The median urinary free thiol concentration increased to 3 mM by 1 h after mesna infusion, declining to background levels by 4 h. The rate of mesna excretion correlated with the creatinine clearance rate in a subset of six patients. The proportion of mesna recovered in urine within 4 h after infusion was lower (P less than 0.05) in children who had evidence of preexisting renal tubular damage. Ifosfamide-induced tubular proteinuria was associated with lower urinary mesna recovery. Low urinary mesna concentrations indicated potentially subtherapeutic renal tubular levels. However, ifosfamide nephrotoxicity was subclinical and is not necessarily linked to differences in mesna excretion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Pharmacokinetics of mesna and dimesna after simultaneous intravenous bolus and infusion administration in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

This study was undertaken to examine the pharmacokinetics of mesna and its dimer form, dimesna, in the plasma and urine of patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation who received 130 mg/kg of mesna divided intravenously into a 30-mg/kg bolus dose followed immediately by 100 mg/kg infused over 12 hours for uroprotection. The relationship between and urinary excretion of mesna and dimesna also was examined by comparing the data obtained in patients who developed hemorrhagic cystitis versus those who did not. Blood and urine samples were collected at different time intervals after administration, and the plasma or urine was analyzed by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Dimesna was analyzed in these samples after reduction back to mesna with sodium borohydride. The concentration-time data of mesna exhibited the characteristics of the two-compartment model well, and the mean +/-SD values of the distributive phase half-life (t1/2 alpha), postdistributive phase half-life (t1/2 beta), volume of distribution of the central compartment (Vdc), volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss), volume of distribution during the postdistributive phase (Vd beta), total clearance (Cl), and mean residence time (MRT) observed were 0.12 +/- 0.15 hours, 2.12 +/- 1.61 hours, 0.324 +/- 0.336 L/kg, 1.09 +/- 1.18 L/kg, 2.09 +/- 3.0 L/kg, 0.755 +/- 0.507 L/hr.kg, and 6.77 +/- 0.72 hours, respectively. The mean +/-SD values of t1/2 and MRT of dimesna were 1.29 +/- 0.6 hours and 6.68 +/- 1.05 hours, respectively, and the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of mesna to that of dimesna was 1.21 +/- 0.57. The fractions of dose excreted in urine in the form of mesna and dimesna in 20 hours (fu) were 0.361 +/- 0.15 and 0.482 +/- 0.25, and the renal clearance (ClR) values were 0.244 +/- 0.201 L/hr.kg and 0.157 +/- 0.156 L/hr.kg, respectively. The urinary excretion of mesna in these patients was higher than that required for uroprotection for the whole duration of infusion, and there was no significant difference in the pharmacokinetics of mesna between patients who developed hemorrhagic cystitis and those who did not. This was not the case with dimesna, in which patients with hemorrhagic cystitis excreted in urine less than 50% of the amount of dimesna excreted by those without hemorrhagic cystitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Combined intravenous and oral mesna in outpatients treated with ifosfamide.

PURPOSE: To prevent hemorrhagic cystitis, mesna is typically injected intravenously (i.v.) at the time of an ifosfamide dose and 4 and 8 h later. To simplify outpatient ifosfamide therapy, we gave the second and third mesna doses orally. METHODS: The mesna doses (400 or 600 mg/m2) were 40% (w/w) of each ifosfamide dose (1.0 or 1.5 g/m2), which was given daily for 5 days. We evaluated urinary mesna excretion and plasma concentrations in ten patients from the beginning of mesna infusion until the time of the second oral dose. The first oral dose was administered at hour 2 in the last six patients to allow time for absorption of mesna. RESULTS: The rate and amount of mesna excretion was less variable over time and among patients after oral than after i.v. administration. No macrohematuria was observed in these ten patients nor in an additional 50 patients given oral mesna at hours 2 and 8 during at least two cycles of ifosfamide therapy. CONCLUSION: These pharmacokinetic and clinical efficacy data support the use of a combined regimen of i.v. and oral mesna to simplify outpatient ifosfamide administration.

Administration, Oral↗