Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Management Audit”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Use of a content analysis procedure for the development of a Falls Management Audit Tool.

The Falls Management Audit Tool (FMAT) was developed to assess the documentation of the falls management process in nursing homes. The multistep content analysis procedure was used to guide tool development and obtain reliability and validity of the FMAT. Established fall guidelines and national experts were used for item development. Trained gerontological nurse practitioners conducted chart audits in nursing home residents with a fall history. Adequate content validity (content validity index > .88) and interrater and intrarater reliability were established (kappas > .78) in the final version of the 57-item FMAT and pilot testing demonstrated feasibility. This study provided evidence that the FMAT is a reliable and valid tool, which can be used to assess the documentation of the falls management process and for measuring the effect of research or quality improvement interventions.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed1992

[Determination of prevalence and control level of hypertension in the community: Hypertension Management Audit Project--Vicenza].

As a part of the "Hypertension Management Audit Project" a random sample of 4070 subjects was drawn from the population aged 35-64 living in the city of Vicenza, in order to assess the prevalence and the level of control of hypertension in the community. 2854 (70.1%) were screened in the first step of the survey. Two blood pressure (BP) reading, height and weight measurements were performed and a short questionnaire filled in. Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were (mean and 95% confidence interval) 143.7 (142.6-144.7) and 88.3 (87.7-88.8) mmHg in males; 137.8 (136.8-138.8) and 84.9 (84.5-85.5) mmHg in females, respectively. The BP value corresponding to the 95 degrees percentile of the cumulative distribution of BP was 180 mmHg for SBP and 105 mmHg for DBP in males; 173 mmHg for SBP and 100 mmHg for DBP in females. Systo-diastolic hypertension was present in 12.3% of the screened population; isolated diastolic hypertension in 9.1%; isolated systolic hypertension in 5.3%; borderline hypertension in 31.6%; severe hypertension (DBP > or = 115 mmHg) was present in 1.9% of females and in 2.2% of males. Prevalence in males was significantly higher with respect to females in all three categories of defined hypertension, but not in borderline hypertension. The second step of the survey involved 849 subjects (29.7% of the screened population) who completed two re-examinations because at the screening they had: 1) history of high BP; 2) BP > or = 160/95 mmHg; 3) ongoing antihypertensive treatment. At the end of the survey, 772 of these subjects (91%) were confirmed as hypertensives (mean BP of six readings > or = 140/90 mmHg and/or taking antihypertensive drugs). Patients aware of their high BP were 78.8%; aware and treated 51.0%; treated and controlled (BP < 140/90 mmHg) 19.1%. All indices of control were significantly higher in female with respect to male patients. Treated patients were significantly older than untreated patients; treated females had significantly lower BP than treated males, whereas no difference was detected between untreated patients; patients unaware of high BP had the highest BP values if compared to treated and untreated patients. This survey reveals a high prevalence of hypertension in the adult population of the city of Vicenza; quality of control shows a moderate improvement if compared to previous studies carried out in our country.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Management audits.

How can a medical group practice be sure it is working toward its objectives and utilizing its resources to its best advantage? A management audit, when properly conducted and reported, appraises a group's general state of health and effectiveness by examining its activities of planning, organizing, supervision, control systems, information flow, cost controls, and productivity. By detecting potentially destructive problems and opportunities for improvement, a management evaluation system will help medical group administrators operate effectively in a time of rapidly changing conditions.

Group Practice↗
PubMed1992

Impediments to the control of hypertension. Hypertension Management Audit Group.

Despite the great therapeutic advances, the control of hypertension in populations is far below the achievable level, even in populations with highly developed health care. By the end of the 1980's, in selected European centres, 18-34% of cases of hypertension were undetected, and among those previously known, 22-38% were untreated. The cooperative WHO/WHL Hypertension Management Audit Project aimed at assessing some of the impediments to better control of hypertension. The concepts and attitudes of 2,215 physicians were surveyed. In various centres and at various patient ages, 25-45% of physicians would not start drug treatment below 100 mm Hg. When inquiring into the perceived reasons why hypertension had not been detected earlier, among other reasons, physicians tended to incriminate their workload, while patients often felt that there was a lack of interest on the doctor's part to take a blood pressure reading. In general, patient satisfaction seemed suboptimal. Physician's sources of information were varied; neither WHO, nor ISH or WHL seemed to play an important role in informing the physicians.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

How is your materiel management audit program?

This article has provided a view from the auditor's eyes of some key components inherent in a sound materiel management system. Every system, however, has its own unique characteristics, some of which may contain internal control situations that are not addressed herein. Although most will apply, not every comment contained in this article will be practical to all systems. The hospital size, utilization, patient mix, service mix, physical outlay, organizational structure, financial condition, and management philosophy will all have an influence on the role of materiel management. Automation of various materiel management functions can be beneficial by providing informational and control enhancements not feasible in a manual system. However, automation also raises new internal-control concerns that need to be addressed. Strong internal control techniques and compliance with adequate policies and procedures will prepare materiel management for its role in future hospital operations.

Management Audit↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Fever management audit: Australian nurses' antipyretic usage.

Do nurses manage fevers of children hospitalized for a febrile illness ritualistically or rationally? Nurses recorded temperatures more frequently during the first 8 hours in the ward with a mean frequency of 13.36 (SD = 4.76, range 5 to 24) during the first 24 hours following admission. In the majority of cases, there was a strong second hourly pattern of temperature monitoring according to the time of day (e.g., 0600 hr, 0800 hrs, 1000 hr). Seventy-six percent (51) of the children received at least one antipyretic. The mean temperature when antipyretics were administered was 38.34 degrees C (SD = 1.02, range 35.9 degrees C to 40.8 degrees C). The highest antipyretic administration occurred during the daytime, and the highest temperature recording occurred during the nighttime. Antipyretic administration and mean temperatures generally followed a similar pattern, except at 0800 and 1600 hours when antipyretic administration was high and mean temperatures low. This study revealed a need to further investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and decision-making criteria of nurses toward fever management.

Analgesics, Non-Narcotic↗
PubMed1994

What about the health of ancillary staff? A management audit.

Health at Work in the NHS was launched at the same time as Health of the Nations, in July 1992. There is good national and local evidence identifying ancillary staff as a priority for health promotion. Despite the evidence, and a regional drive to make work with ancillary staff a priority, a recent audit made clear that very little has happened. Market testing seems to have excluded ancillary staff health from senior management responsibility. discusses possible reasons and the implications.

Allied Health Personnel↗
PubMed1997

Critical features of an auditable management system for an ISO 9000-compatible occupational health and safety standard.

An International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001: 1994-harmonized occupational health and safety (OHS) management system has been written at the University of Michigan, and reviewed, revised, and accepted under the direction of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSMS) Task Force and the Board of Directors. This system is easily adaptable to the ISO 14001 format and to both OHS and environmental management system applications. As was the case with ISO 9001: 1994, this system is expected to be compatible with current production quality and OHS quality systems and standards, have forward compatibility for new applications, and forward flexibility, with new features added as needed. Since ISO 9001: 1987 and 9001: 1994 have been applied worldwide, the incorporation of harmonized OHS and environmental management system components should be acceptable to business units already performing first-party (self-) auditing, and second-party (contract qualification) auditing. This article explains the basis of this OHS management system, its relationship to ISO 9001 and 14001 standards, the philosophy and methodology of an ISO-harmonized system audit, the relationship of these systems to traditional OHS audit systems, and the authors' vision of the future for application of such systems.

Environmental Health↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A regional pain management audit.

An audit was carried out in the Northern and Yorkshire region to assess postoperative pain management outcomes. Pain scores were measured in the recovery room at 24 hours and at seven days postoperatively, at rest and on movement. A verbal numerical rating score (VNRS) tool was used. Data was also collected on the modalities of pain management. The results show that a large percentage of patients reported unacceptable levels of pain despite changes in practice and the development of acute pain management teams. Epidural infusion was the most effective modality and intramuscular opioid with non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and codeine were shown to be more effective than patient-controlled analgesia. Sites with pain management teams did not provide better pain management for postoperative patients.

Analgesics↗