Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MELPHALAN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Alkylator resistance in human B lymphoid cell lines: (1). Melphalan accumulation, cytotoxicity, interstrand-DNA-crosslinks, cell cycle analysis, and glutathione content in the melphalan-sensitive B-lymphocytic cell line (WIL2) and in the melphalan-resistant B-CLL cell line (WSU-CLL).

Two human B lymphoid cell lines WIL2 (melphalan sensitive. ***IC50:8.57 +/- 1.08 mM) and WSU-CLL (melphalan resistant, ***IC50:223.18 +/- 6.45 mM) were used as models to study alkylator resistance in human lymphoid cells. Melphalan transport studies demonstrated decreased initial melphalan accumulation in WSU-CLL cells as compared to WIL2 cells. Lineweaver-Burk plots of the rate of initial melphalan uptake showed an approximately 3.5-fold decrease of Vmax in WSU-CLL cells as compared to WIL2 cells. Melphalan transport was inhibited by 2-amino-bicyclo[2,2,1] heptane-2-carboxylic acid(BCH) in both cell lines, indicating that the amino acid transport (System L, which is sodium independent and inhibited by BCH) is functional in these two cell lines. Only a minor degree of inhibition of melphalan transport was noted after sodium depletion (System ASC, which is sodium dependent and unaffected by BCH). Interstrand-DNA-cross-link formation showed a highly significant correlation with in-vitro cytotoxicity in both two cell lines. However, the melphalan concentration at which such interstrand DNA cross-linking occurred differed significantly when WIL2 cells and WSU-CLL cells were compared. The kinetics of interstrand-DNA-cross-link formation and removal following treatment with melphalan also differed significantly, with WSU-CLL cells, showing a much more rapid rate of removal of interstand DNA cross-links as compared to WIL2 cells. Cell cycle analysis showed that melphalan treatment resulted in the progressive arrest of the WSU cells in G1 and G2 phases. But WIL2 cells failed to enter G1 or G2 arrest after melphalan treatment, suggesting an increased rate of DNA repair occurring in melphalan-resistant WSU-CLL cells. There was no significant difference between the two cell lines in regard to either glutathione content or glutathione-S transferase activity. These findings indicate that multiple factors are associated with alkylator resistance in lymphoid cells including alteration of uptake, DNA repair and cell cycle progression. However no evidence for alteration in glutathione content and glutathione-S-transferase activity was found.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗
PubMed1990

Alkylation of DNA by melphalan in relation to immunoassay of melphalan-DNA adducts: characterization of mono-alkylated and cross-linked products from reaction of melphalan with dGMP and GMP.

A product expected to result from cross-linking of guanine bases in DNA by melphalan (4-(2-(di-guanin-7-yl))ethylamino-L-phenylalanine) was obtained from hydrolysis of melphalan-treated sodium deoxyguanylate at pH7 and characterized by U.V. and mass spectra. When tested in a competitive immunoassay using an antibody specific for melphalan-alkylated DNA it showed an affinity intermediate between that of melphalan-alkylated DNA and melphalan. From this and other assays it seemed possible that the cross-linked moiety in DNA was recognised by the antibody, but that its conformation differed from that of the free base tested, sufficiently to account for the discrepancy. It seemed possible that cross-linked guanine nucleotides would provide a better model, and these were therefore isolated, characterised and tested. Products derived from cross-linking of guanylic acid moieties through N-7 and N-7, and through N-7 and phosphate, had higher affinity than the cross-linked base, approximately the same as for alkylated native DNA, but less than for alkylated denatured DNA or RNA.

Alkylation↗
PubMed1997

Melphalan dosing regimens for management of recurrent melanoma by isolated limb perfusion: application of a physiological pharmacokinetic model based on melphalan distribution in the isolated perfused rat hindlimb.

The optimal dosing schedule for melphalan therapy of recurrent malignant melanoma in isolated limb perfusions has been examined using a physiological pharmacokinetic model with data from isolated rat hindlimb perfusions (IRHP). The study included a comparison of melphalan distribution in IRHP under hyperthermia and normothermia conditions. Rat hindlimbs were perfused with Krebs-Hen-seleit buffer containing 4.7% bovine serum albumin at 37 or 41.5 degrees C at a flow rate of 4 ml/min. Concentrations of melphalan in perfusate and tissues were determined by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. The concentration of melphalan in perfusate and tissues was linearly related to the input concentration. The rate and amount of melphalan uptake into the different tissues was higher at 41.5 degrees C than at 37 degrees C. A physiological pharmacokinetic model was validated from the tissue and perfusate time course of melphalan after melphalan perfusion. Application of the model involved the amount of melphalan exposure in the muscle, skin and fat in a recirculation system was related to the method of melphalan administration: single bolus > divided bolus > infusion. The peak concentration of melphalan in the perfusate was also related to the method of administration in the same order. Infusing the total dose of melphalan over 20 min during a 60 min perfusion optimized the exposure of tissues to melphalan whilst minimizing the peak perfusate concentration of melphalan. It is suggested that this method of melphalan administration may be preferable to other methods in terms of optimizing the efficacy of melphalan whilst minimizing the limb toxicity associated with its use in isolated limb perfusion.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Randomized multicenter trial of hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with melphalan alone compared with melphalan plus tumor necrosis factor: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0020.

PURPOSE: To determine in a randomized prospective multi-institutional trial whether the addition of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) to a melphalan-based hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) treatment would improve the complete response rate for locally advanced extremity melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced extremity melanoma were randomly assigned to receive melphalan or melphalan plus TNF-alpha during standard HILP. Patient randomization was stratified according to disease/treatment status and regional nodal disease status. RESULTS: The intervention was completed in 124 patients of the 133 enrolled. Grade 4 adverse events were observed in 14 (12%) of 129 patients, with three (4%) of 64 in the melphalan-alone arm and 11 (16%) of 65 in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm (P = .0436). There were two toxicity-related lower extremity amputations in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm, and one disease progression-related upper extremity amputation in the melphalan-alone arm. There was no treatment-related mortality in either arm of the study. One hundred sixteen patients were assessable at 3 months postoperatively. Sixty-four percent of patients (36 of 58) in the melphalan-alone arm and 69% of patients (40 of 58) in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm showed a response to treatment at 3 months, with a complete response rate of 25% (14 of 58 patients) in the melphalan-alone arm and 26% (15 of 58 patients) in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm (P = .435 and P = .890, respectively). CONCLUSION: In locally advanced extremity melanoma treated with HILP, the addition of TNF-alpha to melphalan did not demonstrate a significant enhancement of short-term response rates over melphalan alone by the 3-month follow-up, and TNF-alpha plus melphalan was associated with a higher complication rate.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Hyperthermia-induced enhancement of melphalan activity against a melphalan-resistant human rhabdomyosarcoma xenograft.

The effects of regional hyperthermia (42 degrees C for 70 min) on the antitumor activity of melphalan were examined in athymic mice bearing melphalan-resistant human rhabdomyosarcoma (TE-671 MR) xenografts growing in the right hind limb, and results were compared with similar studies of melphalan-sensitive (TE-671) parent xenografts. Melphalan alone at a dose of 36 mg/m2 (0.5 of the 10% lethal dose) produced growth delays of 4.1 to 10.2 days in TE-671 MR xenografts and 21.8 to 28.7 days in TE-671, respectively. Hyperthermia alone produced growth delays of 0.9 days in TE-671 MR xenografts and 0.8 days in TE-671. Combination therapy with melphalan and hyperthermia produced growth delays of 7.2 to 13.3 days in TE-671 MR xenografts and 34.3 to 42.8 days in TE-671, respectively, representing a mean thermal enhancement ratio of 1.7 in TE-671 MR and 1.5 in TE-671. Measurement of glutathione levels in TE-671 MR xenografts following treatment with melphalan, hyperthermia, or melphalan plus hyperthermia revealed significant reductions in glutathione content with the nadir (60% of control values) seen 6 h following treatment. Glutathione levels in TE-671 xenografts following identical therapy revealed no differences from control values. Hyperthermia plus melphalan did not result in a higher tumor-to-plasma melphalan ratio compared with treatment with melphalan alone in either TE-671 MR or TE-671 xenografts. These studies suggest that heat-induced alterations in tumor glutathione or melphalan levels are not responsible for the increase in melphalan activity produced by hyperthermia. Combination therapy with melphalan plus regional hyperthermia offers promise for treatment of melphalan-resistant neoplasms.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Regional toxicity after isolated limb perfusion with melphalan and tumour necrosis factor- alpha versus toxicity after melphalan alone.

AIMS: To determine whether the addition of high-dose tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) to isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan increases acute regional tissue toxicity compared to ILP with melphalan alone. METHODS: A retrospective, multivariate analysis of toxicity after normothermic (37--38 degrees C) and 'mild' hyperthermic (38--40 degrees C) ILPs for melanoma was undertaken. Normothermic ILP with melphalan was performed in 294 patients (70.8%), 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan in 71 patients (17.1%) and 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan combined with TNF alpha in 50 patients (12.0%). Toxicity was nil or mild (grades I--II according to Wieberdink et al.) in 339 patients (81.7%), and more severe acute regional toxicity (grades III--V) developed in 76 patients (18.3%). A stepwise logistic regression procedure was performed for the multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for more severe toxicity. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan plus TNF alpha significantly increased the incidence of more severe acute regional toxicity compared to normothermic and 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan alone (36% vs 16% and 17%; P=0.0038). However, after ILP using TNF alpha no grade IV (compartment compression syndrome) or grade V (toxicity necessitating amputation) reactions were seen. Significantly more severe toxicity was seen after ILPs performed between 1991 and 1994 compared with earlier ILPs (33%vs 14%P=0.0001). Also, women had a higher risk of more severe toxicity than men (22% vs 7%; P=0.0007). After multivariate analysis, prognostic factors which remained significant were: sex (P=0.0013) and either ILP schedule (P=0.013) or treatment period (P=0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Regional toxicity after 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan and TNF alpha was significantly increased compared to ILP with melphalan alone. This may be caused by increased thermal enhancement of melphalan due to the higher tissue temperatures (39--40 degrees C) at which the melphalan in the TNF alpha-ILPs was administered or by an interaction between high-dose TNF alpha and melphalan.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

High-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the measurement of melphalan and its hydrolysis products in perfusate and plasma and melphalan in tissues from human and rat isolated limb perfusions.

A sensitive, specific and rapid reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay was developed for the quantitation of melphalan and its hydrolysis products in samples from the isolated perfusion of human and rat limbs. Samples of perfusate, plasma and tissue were analysed, following methanol precipitation, using a phenyl column and fluorescence detection. Dansyl-arginine (38 micrograms ml-1) was employed as the internal standard. Good resolution was observed allowing quantitation of melphalan, monohydroxymelphalan (MOH) and dihydroxymelphalan (DOH) in perfusate and plasma were all 100 +/- 10%. The recovery of melphalan in tissue was 93.5%. A linear response was demonstrated for melphalan in the concentration range 1.8 - 56.8 micrograms ml-1, for DOH in the concentration range 0.5 - 30.0 micrograms ml-1 and for MOH in the range 1.4-25.1 micrograms ml-1, in perfusate and plasma. The lower limits of quantitation of melphalan, MOH and DOH in perfusate and plasma were 1.4, 2.4 and 1.2 ng on column, respectively, and 7.2 ng of melphalan on column in tissue. Intra-assay coefficients of variation (C.V.) for melphalan, MOH and DOH, at low and high concentrations were all less than 5% and the inter-assay C.V.s were less than 9%. An ultra-filtration study to determine the protein binding of melphalan and the hydrolysis products showed that the unbound fractions (fu) of melphalan in buffer containing dextran and bovine serum albumin were 0.873 and 0.521, respectively. The assay was used to quantitate melphalan and its hydrolysis products in samples from isolated perfusions in the human limb and rat hindlimb.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed1993

Decreased melphalan accumulation in a human breast cancer cell line selected for resistance to melphalan.

An in vitro model of acquired melphalan resistance was developed by serial incubation of an MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line in increasing concentrations of melphalan. The resulting derivative cell line, Me1R MCF-7, was 30-fold resistant to melphalan. Uptake studies demonstrated decreased initial melphalan accumulation in Me1R MCF-7 cells. Inverse-reciprocal plots of initial melphalan uptake revealed a 4-fold decrease in the apparent Vmax of Me1R MCF-7 compared with WT MCF-7 (516 amol cell-1 min-1 vs 2110 amol cell-1 min-1 respectively) as well as a decrease in the apparent Kt (36 microM vs 70 microM respectively). Two amino acid transporters have previously been identified as melphalan transporters: system L, which is sodium-independent and inhibited by 2-amino-bicyclo[2,2,1]heptane-2-carboxylic acid (BCH), and system ASC which is sodium dependent and unaffected by BCH. At low concentrations of melphalan (3-30 microM), 1mM BCH competition eliminated the differences between the two cell lines, thus implicating an alteration of the system L transporter in the transport defect in the resistant cells. Me1R MCF-7 cells were also evaluated for glutathione-mediated detoxification mechanisms associated with melphalan resistance. There was no difference between Me1R MCF-7 and WT MCF-7 in glutathione content, glutathione-S-transferase activity and expression of pi class glutathione S-transferase RNA. In addition, buthionine sulfoximine did not reverse melphalan resistance in Me1R MCF-7 cells. Therefore, Me1R MCF-7 cells provide an in vitro model of transport-mediated melphalan resistance in human breast cancer cells.

Amino Acid Transport Systems↗
PubMed2004

Melphalan versus melphalan plus busulphan in conditioning to autologous stem cell transplantation for low-risk multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: High-dose chemotherapy conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation generally give similar results in multiple myeloma. We compared two regimens: melphalan versus melphalan plus busulphan. METHODS: In all, 30 untreated patients with stage III low-risk multiple myeloma were studied. After induction with three VAD courses and mobilization with cyclophosphamide 7 g/m(2) and recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) (10 microg/kg b.w./die), they received melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (arm A) or busulphan 16 mg/kg plus melphalan 100 mg/m(2) (arm B) for conditioning for transplantation. All patients received maintenance therapy with Interferon 3 MU x 3/week. RESULTS: Time to engraftment after transplantation was similar in both groups. All patients received rHuG-CSF after reinfusion of peripheral stem cells. No differences emerged in transplant-related infective and noninfective complications. There were no transplant-related deaths. A better response was observed in the melphalan plus busulphan regimen (85 versus 75%, P<0.05). The 5-year overall survival with this regimen was 56 versus 49% with melphalan, and the median survival was 126 months versus 108 months for melphalan (P=0.7). The median progression-free survival was 121 months for melphalan plus busulphan versus 97 months for melphalan (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: These two conditioning regimens showed similar overall response rate and overall survival, though progression-free survival was better with busulphan plus melphalan.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Melphalan availability in hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha+/+ and factor-1alpha-/- tumors is independent of tumor vessel density and correlates with melphalan erythrocyte transport.

Many tumors are impervious to anticancer agents. Resistance due to lack of cytotoxic penetration into the tumor is often overlooked but can play a significant role in undermining therapy. Insufficient and irregular vascularization of tumors is a possible barrier to drug delivery, but there are others, e.g., impaired vessel permeability and poor interstitial transport. We evaluated the importance of tumor vessel density in the availability of melphalan to tumors. A nude mouse tumor model with different vascularization due to a single-gene deletion of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha(+/+) and HIF-1alpha(-/-) embryonic stem cell-derived tumors) was used. The availability of melphalan to HIF-1alpha(+/+) (n = 20) and HIF-1alpha(-/-) (n = 23) tumors was not significantly different (p = 0.12). Furthermore, in the various subgroup analyses accentuating the difference in vessel density, no significant correlation between vessel density and melphalan availability was found. In the second part of the study, melphalan, was demonstrated to be transported in blood in mice with a distribution of 24% in erythrocytes vs. 76% in plasma. A strong correlation (r = 0.93, p < 0.000001) between melphalan concentrations in plasma and erythrocytes was found, indicating an equilibrium between these 2 compartments. Plasma and erythrocyte concentrations of melphalan are correlated with the tumor availability of melphalan (r = 0.66 and 0.64, respectively, both p < 0.001). These data suggest that tumor vessel density is not an important predictor of the tumor availability of small cytotoxic drugs such as melphalan and indicate the importance of erythrocytes in the transport of melphalan.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

A monofunctional derivative of melphalan: preparation, DNA alkylation products, and determination of the specificity of monoclonal antibodies that recognize melphalan-DNA adducts.

Bifunctional alkylating agents, such as those based on nitrogen mustard, form important parts of many anti-cancer chemotherapy protocols and are responsible for increased incidences of secondary tumors in successfully treated patients. These drugs generally form a majority of monofunctional DNA adducts, although the bifunctional adducts appear to be necessary for their powerful cytotoxic and antitumor effects. The relative importance of bifunctional as opposed to monofunctional adducts in the varied biological consequences of drug exposure has not been studied in detail, particularly in relation to the role and specificity of biochemical responses to therapy-related DNA damage. A simple method is described for the preparation of useful quantities of a pure monofunctional derivative of the nitrogen mustard-based drug melphalan. Monohydroxymelphalan was prepared by partial hydrolysis, purified by reversed phase chromatography, and characterized by MS, NMR, and HPLC. Contamination with melphalan was </=0.2%. The heat labile DNA base adducts formed by monohydroxymelphalan were shown to contain undetectable levels of cross-linked species. The ratio of adenine to guanine adducts was 0.62, similar to the equivalent ratio for melphalan. The sequence-dependent pattern of alkylation of purified DNA was indistinguishable from that of melphalan, but required a higher dose to achieve comparable extents of reaction. The specificities of two monoclonal antibodies that recognize melphalan-DNA adducts were investigated using DNA alkylated with [3H]monohydroxymelphalan. Adducts on this DNA showed similar immunoreactivities to adducts formed by melphalan. This shows clearly that neither antibody was specific for cross-linked adducts and that it is therefore possible to quantify adducts formed by both monohydroxymelphalan and melphalan with high sensitivities. The availability of monohydroxymelphalan in addition to melphalan, together with sensitive immunoassays for adducts on extracted DNA and in individual cells, constitutes a useful system for investigating cellular responses to the DNA modifications formed by a clinically relevant drug.

Alkylation↗
PubMed1999

Prospective randomized trial of melphalan and prednisone versus vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone in the treatment of primary systemic amyloidosis.

PURPOSE: Primary systemic amyloidosis is an immunoglobulin deposition disorder in which insoluble light chains cause organ dysfunction and death. The established conventional therapy is treatment with melphalan and prednisone. We investigated whether treatment with multiple alkylating agents improved the response rate or survival time, compared with melphalan and prednisone therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 101 patients with biopsy-proven primary amyloidosis. The patients were randomly assigned to receive melphalan and prednisone (52 patients) or vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (49 patients). Patients were stratified according to the presence of cardiac involvement, time from diagnosis to randomization, serum beta2-microglobulin level, and whether peripheral neuropathy was the major manifestation of the disease. RESULTS: The median duration of survival after randomization was 29 months, with no differences in survival time between the two groups. There were 29 patients who fulfilled the response criteria: 15 in the vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone arm and 14 in the melphalan and prednisone arm. CONCLUSION: Therapy with multiple alkylating agents did not result in a higher response rate or longer survival time, compared with standard melphalan and prednisone treatment in patients with primary systemic amyloidosis.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Phase I study of melphalan alone and melphalan plus whole body hyperthermia in dogs with malignant melanoma.

The maximum tolerated dose of melphalan combined with whole body hyperthermia (WBH) in dogs with spontaneous malignant melanoma was lower than in dogs not receiving WBH by a factor of 1.9 +/- 0.71. Thirty-three dogs were treated monthly with escalating doses of melphalan and followed weekly for toxicity and, when possible, tumour response. Toxicity was manifested as myelosuppression with nadir neutrophil and platelet counts occurring at 7-10 days post-treatment. The TD50 (+/- S.E.), defined by logistic regression analysis, was 0.63 (+/- 0.07) mg/kg and 0.33 (+/- 0.10) mg/kg for melphalan alone and combined with WBH, respectively. Objective tumour response in this limited series occurred in three of fourteen evaluable dogs (three of eleven treated with melphalan alone and none of three treated with WBH plus melphalan). It is concluded that melphalan combined with WBH can be safely administered, although a reduction in dose is necessary. A randomized clinical trial is required to investigate the possibility of achieving therapeutic benefit from combined melphalan and WBH.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

The FA/BRCA pathway is involved in melphalan-induced DNA interstrand cross-link repair and accounts for melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells.

Melphalan, a DNA cross-linker, is one of the most widely used and effective drugs in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). In this report, we demonstrate that enhanced interstrand cross-link (ICL) repair via the Fanconi anemia (FA)/BRCA pathway contributes to acquired drug resistance in melphalan-resistant myeloma cell lines, and disruption of this pathway reverses drug resistance. Using the alkaline comet assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis), we observed that melphalan-resistant cells have reduced ICL formation and enhanced ICL repair compared with melphalan-sensitive cells. Cell-cycle studies demonstrated that enhanced ICL repair released cells from melphalan-induced cell-cycle delay. Using siRNA to knock down FANCF in 8226/LR5 and U266/LR6 drug-resistant cells demonstrated a direct relationship between ICL repair capacity and drug sensitivity. Overexpression of FANCF in 8226/S and U266/S drug-sensitive cells partially reproduced the drug-resistant phenotype. These data show that enhanced DNA repair via the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway is involved in acquired melphalan resistance. Our findings provide for a new target to enhance response to DNA cross-linking agents in cancer treatment.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗
PubMed1986

Therapy of stage III (optimal) epithelial carcinoma of the ovary with melphalan or melphalan plus Corynebacterium parvum (a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study).

A randomized prospective therapy trial in patients with stage III optimal epithelial carcinoma of the ovary was accomplished by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Therapy with melphalan or melphalan plus immuno-adjuvant, Corynebacterium parvum (C. parvum), was utilized as adjuvant treatment following surgical therapy. One hundred eight-five patients were eligible for evaluation with 87 patients in the melphalan group and 98 patients in the melphalan plus C. parvum group. The comparison of the treatment regimens showed no differences with respect to either progression-free interval or survival. However, it should be noted that a 50% 3-year survival was obtained. A group was identified, using four prognostic factors that had 80% survival at 3 years. Maximum size of the residual tumor, as well as performance status, was not prognostically significant. This study demonstrates a lack of efficacy of the addition of C. parvum to melphalan for this patient population.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Modulation of melphalan resistance in glioma cells with a peripheral benzodiazepine receptor ligand-melphalan conjugate.

Peripheral benzodiazepine receptors (PBRs) are located on the outer membrane of mitochondria, and their density is increased in brain tumors. Thus, they may serve as a unique intracellular and selective target for antineoplastic agents. A PBR ligand-melphalan conjugate (PBR-MEL) was synthesized and evaluated for cytotoxicity and affinity for PBRs. PBR-MEL (9) (i.e., 670 amu) was synthesized by coupling of two key intermediates: 4-[bis(2-chloroethyl)-amino]-L-phenylalanine ethyl ester trifluoroacetate (6) and 1-(3'-carboxylpropyl)-7-chloro-1,3- dihydro-5-phenyl-2H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one (8). On the basis of receptor-binding displacement assays in rat brain and glioma cells, 9 had appreciable binding affinity and displaced a prototypical PBR ligand, Ro 5-4864, with IC50 values between 289 and 390 nM. 9 displayed differential cytotoxicity to a variety of rat and human brain tumor cell lines. In some of the cell lines tested including rat and human melphalan-resistant cell lines, 9 demonstrated appreciable cytotoxicity with IC50 values in the micromolar range, lower than that of melphalan alone. The enhanced activity of 9 may reflect increased membrane permeability, increased intracellular retention, or modulation of melphalan's mechanisms of resistance. The combined data support additional studies to determine how 9 may modulate melphalan resistance, its mechanisms of action, and if target selectivity can be achieved in in vivo glioma models.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

A trial of three regimens for primary amyloidosis: colchicine alone, melphalan and prednisone, and melphalan, prednisone, and colchicine.

BACKGROUND: Primary systemic amyloidosis is an uncommon disease characterized by the accumulation in vital organs of a fibrillar protein consisting of monoclonal light chains. METHODS: We treated 220 patients with biopsy-proved amyloidosis. The patients were randomly assigned to receive colchicine (72 patients), melphalan and prednisone (77), or melphalan, prednisone, and colchicine (71). They were stratified according to their chief clinical manifestations: renal disease (105 patients), cardiac involvement (46), peripheral neuropathy (19), or other (50). RESULTS: The median duration of survival after randomization was 8.5 months in the colchicine group, 18 months in the group assigned to melphalan and prednisone, and 17 months in the group assigned to melphalan, prednisone, and colchicine (P<0.001). Among patients who had a reduction in serum or urine monoclonal protein at 12 months, the overall length of survival was 50 months, whereas among those without a reduction at 12 months, the overall length of survival was 36 months (P=0.03). Thirty-four patients (15 percent) survived for five years or longer. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with melphalan and prednisone results in objective responses and prolonged survival as compared with colchicine in patients with primary amyloidosis.

Aged↗
PubMed1983

A randomized comparison of melphalan versus melphalan plus hexamethylmelamine versus adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide in ovarian carcinoma.

A prospective randomized study was conducted in women with suboptimal (greater than or equal to 3 cm residual) Stage III, Stage IV, and recurrent ovarian adenocarcinoma to determine if combination chemotherapy is more effective than melphalan alone in achieving remission and improving survival. Of 233 evaluable patients with measurable disease, there were 64 treated with melphalan alone, of whom 20% achieved a clinical complete response and 17%, a partial response. Of the 97 patients receiving melphalan plus hexamethylmelamine, 28% achieved complete response compared with 32% of 72 patients given Adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide. The partial response rates for the combinations were 24% and 17%, respectively. The effect of these treatments was assessed in an additional 136 evaluable patients without measurable disease by progression-free interval and duration of survival. After statistically adjusting for distribution of cell type and grade, the clinical complete response rate for Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (32%) in measurable cases was significantly higher (P = 0.04) than for melphalan alone. However, this combination did not improve median survival (12.3, 13.5, and 14.2 months, respectively, for M, M + H, and A + C). None of the other parameters showed a statistically significant advantage for combination chemotherapy, but the combinations caused more hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity.

Adenocarcinoma↗